--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
>
> > You act like a bed-wetting child. Talk some sense and stop
making
> > believe everyone should know nonsense that you know. I've told
you, geeks and nerds are of a very different mold than us
successful
> > people.
>
> The monkey boy is a fool and, once more, displays it for eveyone
to
> see. LMAO.
Real clever answer.
Thank you. If you didn't make such a fool out of yourself all the
time it wouldn't be so easy.
Typical geek reply.
> > > In one case the individual showed me a rather large check,
> >
> > WOW! That means a LOT!!
>
> You wanted proof I gave you some proof. If you don't want any
then
> quit asking.
HAHAHAHA!!! How is it that such a paranoid geek requires proof of
everything from others right down to the gnat's ass, yet when it's
his turn he mysteriously lowers that level of proof to "Gee Rob, he
SHOWED me a check"!? More pathetic a bazooka there never was.
The ONLY thing I ever asked proof for is relative to your flat earth
system. I don't care a twit about your personal comments. They're
probably mostly lies and nobody cares.
> >
> > Come on, are you THAT naiive??
>
> No, I understand the facts and the mathematics. I don't have a
> fraudulent system to defend like you do. By the way, not everyone
> WILL win all the time, that I have mentioned more than once. One
of
> your problems is you see ONE example of someone losing as PROOF
that everyone loses. I can't call you naive, you are simply stupid.\
More rambling on about how you have proof that doesn't exist. You'd
be wise to stop here in order to keep the entire foot out of your
mouth. Either submit proof--not conjecture based on theory--or quit
while you're behind.
I've already supplied ABSOLUTE proof. It's in the math. Everything
else is conjecture, including your own claims. You can believe them
or not, I don't care one iota. Nobody cares about your personal
claims either, they want to know what really works. In this case
advantage play has been proven a successful approach through
mathematical analysis.
>
> > People who poll about their success or failure on vpfree are
> > generally a bunch of nickel & quarter-playing wannabees who set
up their fantasies after those the Queen publicly creates out of
thin
> > air about herself, and those who chirp in as successes
experience
> > momentary wins and get big heads over it like you do. You know
> > nothing about any of their consistency, other than to believe
what these gamblers say. You know how much that's worth, don't you?
>
> It's worth a hell of lot more than anything that Robbie (monkey
boy) says. The results of the polls are anonymous. The respondents
have no motivation to lie. You would say anything to protect your
worthless system and your ego. It's so obvious ... everyone can see
through your motivations. Give it up.
You know that losing gamblers do exactly as you do whether in
public
or private:
Yes, I can see that in all your writings. More projected self-image.
They make up a successful world of gambling that they're
involved with in order to create a feeling that they're really
doing
something worth while. It's called DENIAL, Dicky. Whether anonymous
or not. Losing gamblers can in no way admit failure.
Boy, did Robbie ever give a wonderful description of himself in this
post. Give up your ego and accept the truth.
>
> More monkey boy rhetoric without a shred of proof. If you think
> anyone believes this BS you have totally lost it.
>
> > But I lost, and that tells me
> > everything I need to know.
>
> Me too.
Just like a loser to say only that. So how do you feel now that
I've
won $630k since losing $250k???
Maybe you have, maybe not. I don't care. Never have, never will.
>
> > There's no way you're going to convince me
> > that there's anyone out there that is better than I am at doing
> what needs to be done in order to make it a success.
>
> Not only is there "anyone", but there are hundreds out there.
This
> response shows clearly how your ego won't let you see the truth.
HAHAHA again! More of the 'hundreds' myth with zero proof other
than "it has to be that way because I need to justify all the time
I
waste playing".
Actually, more proof than you've ever provided, but nobody cares.
>
> > Another probability theory that looks good to a geek on paper,
but one that never rules the day in gambling.
>
> It always RULEs the day ... the night ... and forever. It's all
in
> the math pure and simple. None of you grousing can change that
FACT.
The fact of what? That there are teams of idiots playing for
progressives for someone else who is so overly addicted to the game
that individual play no longer thrills him? You're clearly clinging
onto your pathological dream in any way possible.
Another example of projected self-image.
>
> > You really believe all that
> > stuff, or are you putting me on??
>
> It has nothing to do with belief. It's FACT. The math doesn't
care
if your playing VP, keno, Texas holdem or any set of random events.
It's the same for all random games. When you deny MATHEMATICAL fact
you are essentially taking a flat-earth position. Everyone else
knows
how stupid your position is on this issue (but you).
blah blah blah with the math again. How boring can you get?
Facts do have a tendency to be boring. Get over it.
When your
wife asks you to pass the salt, do you make her guess how long 'the
math' says it'll take it to get to her?
Nope. It's not an activity that requires analysis. However, your
immensely stupid attempt to create an analogy provides a lot of
insight into exactly how you came up with your flat earth system.
See how stupid your approach
is!
> > > > If they don't apply the proper techniques then they are NOT
> > advantage players. If you want to call them wannabees, that's
OK.
True advantage players understand the need for a strong play.
> >
> > Big deal. Anyone can do that. The proof is in consistent
winning,
> > year-in and year-out.
>
> Nope. That has nothing to do with anything. The proof is in the
math, pure and simple. You can continue to argue that the earth is
flat and your progressive system has merit. Both of them are
equally
false.
So now you have to change the subject again. The proof is ONLY in
consistent winning, and the math has nothing to do with it.
The math has everything to do with it. It is the ONLY thing a player
can use to decide how to approach the game of VP. There will be
winners out there that claim rubbing a rabbits' foot or rubbing the
video monitor is the best approach (about as good as your flat earth
system), but they clearly don't work for everyone. Isolated examples
of winning provide NO evidence that any approach is valid, only the
math can do that. And, of course, the math (through the bell curve)
predicts there will be isolated winners using almost ANY approach you
can think of.
···
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote: