Rumsfeld FINALLY tells the TRUTH

[three2theroyal]

I'm sure that Rob and the moron won't agree with this but it's kinda
nice to finally see someone in the cabinet tell the truth.

Rumsfeld: No Saddam al-Qaida link
Backing away from his pre-war assertions, US Defence Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld has said he has seen no hard evidence linking former
Iraqi president Saddam Hussein to al-Qaida.
Addressing an audience at the Council on Foreign Relations on
Monday, Rumsfeld moved away from his previous statements that linked
Hussein with the international Islamist organisation.
"I have seen the answer to that question migrate in the intelligence
community over a period of a year in the most amazing way. To my
knowledge, I have not seen any strong, hard evidence that links the
two," he said.
Rumsfeld said there were differences in the intelligence community
as to the nature of the relationship.
The nexus between al-Qaida and the Iraqi government was a key point
in the US effort to persuade the world that Saddam Hussein had to be
dealt with after the 11 September 2001 attacks on the United States.
Previous stance
In September 2002, Rumsfeld said the US had "credible" information
that al-Qaida and Iraq had discussed safe havens and non-aggression
agreements, and that its leaders had sought contacts in Iraq who
could help them acquire weapons of mass destruction.
But in his comments on Monday, Rumsfeld said he had relied on the
CIA for his information in the past and appeared to blame the
intelligence reporting for the way the relationship between al-Qaida
and Saddam was portrayed.
"I just read an intelligence report recently about one person who's
connected to al-Qaida who was in and out of Iraq. And it is the most
tortured description of why he might have had a relationship and why
he might not have had a relationship," he said.
"It may have been something that was not representative of a hard
linkage," he said.

[Dan_Cox]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "three2theroyal"
<three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

I'm sure that Rob and the moron won't agree with this but it's

kinda nice to finally see someone in the cabinet tell the truth.

He disagrees with the President, and he's a lame duck. There's
arguments for both sides. You choose what to believe. I believe the
CIA. You believe John Kerry if you want....or Sec. of Defense Sean
Penn.

Rumsfeld: No Saddam al-Qaida link
Backing away from his pre-war assertions, US Defence Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld has said he has seen no hard evidence linking

former

Iraqi president Saddam Hussein to al-Qaida.
Addressing an audience at the Council on Foreign Relations on
Monday, Rumsfeld moved away from his previous statements that

linked

Hussein with the international Islamist organisation.
"I have seen the answer to that question migrate in the

intelligence

community over a period of a year in the most amazing way. To my
knowledge, I have not seen any strong, hard evidence that links

the

two," he said.
Rumsfeld said there were differences in the intelligence community
as to the nature of the relationship.
The nexus between al-Qaida and the Iraqi government was a key

point

in the US effort to persuade the world that Saddam Hussein had to

be

dealt with after the 11 September 2001 attacks on the United

States.

Previous stance
In September 2002, Rumsfeld said the US had "credible" information
that al-Qaida and Iraq had discussed safe havens and non-

aggression

agreements, and that its leaders had sought contacts in Iraq who
could help them acquire weapons of mass destruction.
But in his comments on Monday, Rumsfeld said he had relied on the
CIA for his information in the past and appeared to blame the
intelligence reporting for the way the relationship between al-

Qaida

and Saddam was portrayed.
"I just read an intelligence report recently about one person

who's

connected to al-Qaida who was in and out of Iraq. And it is the

most

tortured description of why he might have had a relationship and

why

···

he might not have had a relationship," he said.
"It may have been something that was not representative of a hard
linkage," he said.

[three2theroyal]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "three2theroyal"
<three2theroyal@y...> wrote:
>
> I'm sure that Rob and the moron won't agree with this but it's
kinda nice to finally see someone in the cabinet tell the truth.

He disagrees with the President, and he's a lame duck. There's
arguments for both sides. You choose what to believe. I believe

the

CIA. You believe John Kerry if you want....or Sec. of Defense Sean
Penn.

Or, maybe..... Secretary of Defense Don Rumsfeld. The first and only
cabinet member to tell the truth. A fine, compasionate conservative
and a good republican. This will keep my smiling for a long time to
come. Say what you want Robby my boy, your house of cards is falling
down.

>
> Rumsfeld: No Saddam al-Qaida link
> Backing away from his pre-war assertions, US Defence Secretary
> Donald Rumsfeld has said he has seen no hard evidence linking
former
> Iraqi president Saddam Hussein to al-Qaida.
> Addressing an audience at the Council on Foreign Relations on
> Monday, Rumsfeld moved away from his previous statements that
linked
> Hussein with the international Islamist organisation.
> "I have seen the answer to that question migrate in the
intelligence
> community over a period of a year in the most amazing way. To my
> knowledge, I have not seen any strong, hard evidence that links
the
> two," he said.
> Rumsfeld said there were differences in the intelligence

community

> as to the nature of the relationship.
> The nexus between al-Qaida and the Iraqi government was a key
point
> in the US effort to persuade the world that Saddam Hussein had

to

be
> dealt with after the 11 September 2001 attacks on the United
States.
> Previous stance
> In September 2002, Rumsfeld said the US had "credible"

information

> that al-Qaida and Iraq had discussed safe havens and non-
aggression
> agreements, and that its leaders had sought contacts in Iraq who
> could help them acquire weapons of mass destruction.
> But in his comments on Monday, Rumsfeld said he had relied on

the

> CIA for his information in the past and appeared to blame the
> intelligence reporting for the way the relationship between al-
Qaida
> and Saddam was portrayed.
> "I just read an intelligence report recently about one person
who's
> connected to al-Qaida who was in and out of Iraq. And it is the
most
> tortured description of why he might have had a relationship and
why
> he might not have had a relationship," he said.
> "It may have been something that was not representative of a

hard

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

> linkage," he said.

[Dan_Cox]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "three2theroyal"
<three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

> He disagrees with the President, and he's a lame duck. There's
> arguments for both sides. You choose what to believe. I believe
the CIA. You believe John Kerry if you want....or Sec. of Defense

Sean Penn.

Or, maybe..... Secretary of Defense Don Rumsfeld. The first and

only cabinet member to tell the truth. A fine, compasionate
conservative and a good republican. This will keep my smiling for a
long time to come. Say what you want Robby my boy, your house of
cards is falling down.

It's obvious you need SOMETHING that will take away the constant,
never-to-be-expunged pain and humiliation of losing the election to a
real man, so if you can create any solace in Rumsfeld's words--a Sec.
of Def. that's on his way out--then that's exactly what you should
do. In fact, I see a strong analogy between this scenario and that of
an optimal-play paducah. After the expected loss, cash in your points
at the slot club and get the 2 free buffets. Certainly, that's worth
FAR more than the loss, and you can even talk yourself into that
being the case for yet another manufactured feel-good position....And
all the while I walk away with the cash.

[rgmustain]

In fact, I see a strong analogy between this scenario and that of
an optimal-play paducah. After the expected loss, cash in your

points

at the slot club and get the 2 free buffets. Certainly, that's

worth

FAR more than the loss, and you can even talk yourself into that
being the case for yet another manufactured feel-good

position....And

all the while I walk away with the cash.

I'm still waiting for the day when "Rob Singer FINALLY tells the
TRUTH". Not today ... Probably never ...

And, to help burst his little bubble, using advantage play today I
cashed in $10 BB, comped two free dinners and walked away ahead $410
for my 3 hours of play (oh, yeah, I earned more than enough points to
fill up on free gas).

I just love a "manufactured feel-good position" that has me $5382
ahead for the last two months playing .25 VP and having fun doing it.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

[Dan_Cox]

I'm still waiting for the day when "Rob Singer FINALLY tells the
TRUTH". Not today ... Probably never ...

Just one more of those minor issues in the world that affect a
neurotic life.

And, to help burst his little bubble, using advantage play today I
cashed in $10 BB, comped two free dinners and walked away ahead

$410 for my 3 hours of play (oh, yeah, I earned more than enough
points to fill up on free gas).

Oh boy! Isn't that just like a consistent loser to feel uppity and on
top of the world after a win of any kind for a change! The truth is,
you have so many flip-flop stories that no one can tell WHAT you do
with your play. All I can gather is that you play too much, you make
your wife play too much, and that your entire life is consumed by an
addiction to the game. A vacation with no video poker? HA! Those days
are long gone, be honest Dicky. That pathological gambling monkey is
forever on your back, and you've ruined the life of your mate in the
process. Be honest for a change.

I just love a "manufactured feel-good position" that has me $5382
ahead for the last two months playing .25 VP and having fun doing

it.

I'm sure ANYBODY would feel just as good manufacturing that. But I'll
go one step beyondo all that. I believe you right now, and I'll take
this opportunity to ridicule yet another time. $5382? Don't be so
vague. Where's the cents??

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

[three2theroyal]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "three2theroyal"
<three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

> > He disagrees with the President, and he's a lame duck. There's
> > arguments for both sides. You choose what to believe. I

believe

> the CIA. You believe John Kerry if you want....or Sec. of

Defense

Sean Penn.
>
> Or, maybe..... Secretary of Defense Don Rumsfeld. The first and
only cabinet member to tell the truth. A fine, compasionate
conservative and a good republican. This will keep my smiling for

a

long time to come. Say what you want Robby my boy, your house of
cards is falling down.
>
It's obvious you need SOMETHING that will take away the constant,
never-to-be-expunged pain and humiliation of losing the election

to a

real man,

Who was a cheerleader in college, not a player. Just like during
Nam, too chicken-shit to do the job.

so if you can create any solace in Rumsfeld's words--a Sec.

of Def. that's on his way out

On his way out?? You know something from your clandestine government
sources that we don't?

--then that's exactly what you should

do. In fact, I see a strong analogy between this scenario and that

of

an optimal-play paducah.

Because everything in life relates to VP. Focus Robby. Keep on the
subject. FOCUS BITCH!! Is that better? are you back?

After the expected loss, cash in your points

at the slot club and get the 2 free buffets. Certainly, that's

worth

FAR more than the loss, and you can even talk yourself into that
being the case for yet another manufactured feel-good

position....And

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

all the while I walk away with the cash.

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> I'm still waiting for the day when "Rob Singer FINALLY tells the
> TRUTH". Not today ... Probably never ...

Just one more of those minor issues in the world that affect a
neurotic life.

Just as I suspected. Telling the truth is considered a "minor issue"
to the monkey boy.

>
> And, to help burst his little bubble, using advantage play today

I

> cashed in $10 BB, comped two free dinners and walked away ahead
$410 for my 3 hours of play (oh, yeah, I earned more than enough
points to fill up on free gas).

Oh boy! Isn't that just like a consistent loser to feel uppity and

on

top of the world after a win of any kind for a change!

Consistent winner, monkey boy. You don't get over 5K ahead in two
months otherwise.

>
> I just love a "manufactured feel-good position" that has me $5382
> ahead for the last two months playing .25 VP and having fun doing
it.

I'm sure ANYBODY would feel just as good manufacturing that. But

I'll

go one step beyondo all that. I believe you right now, and I'll

take

this opportunity to ridicule yet another time.

I wouldn't expect anything less ...

$5382? Don't be so
vague. Where's the cents??

I round everything.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

[tghysel]

> In fact, I see a strong analogy between this scenario and that of
> an optimal-play paducah. After the expected loss, cash in your
points
> at the slot club and get the 2 free buffets. Certainly, that's
worth
> FAR more than the loss, and you can even talk yourself into that
> being the case for yet another manufactured feel-good
position....And
> all the while I walk away with the cash.

I'm still waiting for the day when "Rob Singer FINALLY tells the
TRUTH". Not today ... Probably never ...

And, to help burst his little bubble, using advantage play today I
cashed in $10 BB, comped two free dinners and walked away ahead

$410

for my 3 hours of play (oh, yeah, I earned more than enough points

to

fill up on free gas).

I just love a "manufactured feel-good position" that has me $5382
ahead for the last two months playing .25 VP and having fun doing

it.

Good for you... I like hearing of anyone being up on VP no matter how
they got there.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

[Dan_Cox]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "three2theroyal"
<three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

> It's obvious you need SOMETHING that will take away the constant,
> never-to-be-expunged pain and humiliation of losing the election
to a real man,

Who was a cheerleader in college, not a player. Just like during
Nam, too chicken-shit to do the job.

The pain will never end, will it. Oh well, I'm happy.

On his way out?? You know something from your clandestine

government sources that we don't?

Call it my educated guess.

--then that's exactly what you should
> do. In fact, I see a strong analogy between this scenario and

that of an optimal-play paducah.

Because everything in life relates to VP. Focus Robby. Keep on the
subject. FOCUS BITCH!! Is that better? are you back?

Many things can be traced back to the video poker approach that
misled optimal-play people worship. You're misled there and you're
misled here. It's very clear.

[Dan_Cox]

> Just one more of those minor issues in the world that affect a
> neurotic life.

Just as I suspected. Telling the truth is considered a "minor

issue" to the monkey boy.

I think this time I'll make you look even more foolish than my
previous message. Everyone, including you, knows the 'minor issues'
referred to your neurosis over you not wanting to believe anything
you don't conjure up. Looks like you've got the same ulcer problem
that 3 royals has.

> Oh boy! Isn't that just like a consistent loser to feel uppity

and on top of the world after a win of any kind for a change!

Consistent winner, monkey boy. You don't get over 5K ahead in two
months otherwise.

HaHa! You blooped again, professor. You said you don't play much.
Chances are you don't get ahead a whopping whole $5k in 2 months
playing the penny and nickel games that you do otherwise.

> I'm sure ANYBODY would feel just as good manufacturing that. But
I'll go one step beyondo all that. I believe you right now, and

I'll take this opportunity to ridicule yet another time.

I wouldn't expect anything less ...

Because you're THAT easy to make fun of here.

> $5382? Don't be so
> vague. Where's the cents??

I round everything.

You don't say! Then why did you just round it to $5k when you should
have rounded it to $10k?? Basic math, professor.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > Just one more of those minor issues in the world that affect a
> > neurotic life.
>
> Just as I suspected. Telling the truth is considered a "minor
issue" to the monkey boy.

I think this time I'll make you look even more foolish than my
previous message. Everyone, including you, knows the 'minor issues'
referred to your neurosis over you not wanting to believe anything
you don't conjure up. Looks like you've got the same ulcer problem
that 3 royals has.
>
> > Oh boy! Isn't that just like a consistent loser to feel uppity
and on top of the world after a win of any kind for a change!
>
> Consistent winner, monkey boy. You don't get over 5K ahead in two
> months otherwise.

HaHa! You blooped again, professor. You said you don't play much.

No I didn't. Your reading comprehension problem has gotten you again.
What I said (when you started ranting about Indian casinos) is I
haven't been in an Indian casino in over two months. You really
should get those bifocals replaced.

Chances are you don't get ahead a whopping whole $5k in 2 months
playing the penny and nickel games that you do otherwise.

I never play penny or nickel and I never said I did.

>
> > I'm sure ANYBODY would feel just as good manufacturing that.

But

> I'll go one step beyondo all that. I believe you right now, and
I'll take this opportunity to ridicule yet another time.
>
> I wouldn't expect anything less ...

Because you're THAT easy to make fun of here.

Too bad it always comes back to bite you in the ass, monkey boy.

>
> > $5382? Don't be so
> > vague. Where's the cents??
>
> I round everything.

You don't say! Then why did you just round it to $5k when you

should

have rounded it to $10k?? Basic math, professor.

I didn't round it to "$5k" or "$10K". You're looking foolish again.
You should quit while you're only WAY behind. It will get worse.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

[Dan_Cox]

> > Just as I suspected. Telling the truth is considered a "minor
> issue" to the monkey boy.
>
> I think this time I'll make you look even more foolish than my
> previous message. Everyone, including you, knows the 'minor

issues' referred to your neurosis over you not wanting to believe
anything you don't conjure up. Looks like you've got the same ulcer
problem that 3 royals has.

> >
> HaHa! You blooped again, professor. You said you don't play much.

No I didn't. Your reading comprehension problem has gotten you

again.

What I said (when you started ranting about Indian casinos) is I
haven't been in an Indian casino in over two months. You really
should get those bifocals replaced.

NO I DIDN'T NO I DIDN'T. Isn't that just like a nerdy schoolboy when
the real guys are picking on them telling them they did something
stupid again. You ALWAYS claim you don't play much, and you know you
do....in fact, twice as much because you made your wife into an
addict too.

> Because you're THAT easy to make fun of here.

Too bad it always comes back to bite you in the ass, monkey boy.

You mean like right now???

> You don't say! Then why did you just round it to $5k when you
should have rounded it to $10k?? Basic math, professor.

I didn't round it to "$5k" or "$10K". You're looking foolish again.
You should quit while you're only WAY behind. It will get worse.

Bozo, you just said it was '$5k' in the last post. Einstein's round
up to the nearest ten-thousand. but not Dick....nope, not when he
gets caught!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > > Just as I suspected. Telling the truth is considered a "minor
> > issue" to the monkey boy.
> >
> > I think this time I'll make you look even more foolish than my
> > previous message. Everyone, including you, knows the 'minor
issues' referred to your neurosis over you not wanting to believe
anything you don't conjure up. Looks like you've got the same ulcer
problem that 3 royals has.
> > >
> > HaHa! You blooped again, professor. You said you don't play

much.

>
> No I didn't. Your reading comprehension problem has gotten you
again.
> What I said (when you started ranting about Indian casinos) is I
> haven't been in an Indian casino in over two months. You really
> should get those bifocals replaced.

NO I DIDN'T NO I DIDN'T. Isn't that just like a nerdy schoolboy

when

the real guys are picking on them telling them they did something
stupid again.

Last I checked "real guys" didn't hide behind assumed names, phony
systems and dual ids. You've never been a real man and are obviously
jealous of those that are. Why else would you keep bringing it up?

You ALWAYS claim you don't play much, and you know you
do....in fact, twice as much because you made your wife into an
addict too.

No I didn't. Must be that reading comprehension problem again. The
only thing I've mentioned is my average session time. You are such an
idiot. It gets me chuckling every time. If the "real" monkey boy has
something intelligent to say spit it out or go back into your tree.

>
> > Because you're THAT easy to make fun of here.
>
> Too bad it always comes back to bite you in the ass, monkey boy.

You mean like right now???

Exactly.

>
> > You don't say! Then why did you just round it to $5k when you
> should have rounded it to $10k?? Basic math, professor.
>
> I didn't round it to "$5k" or "$10K". You're looking foolish

again.

> You should quit while you're only WAY behind. It will get worse.

Bozo, you just said it was '$5k' in the last post. Einstein's round
up to the nearest ten-thousand. but not Dick....nope, not when he
gets caught!!

No, I said OVER $5K when referring to my EXACT figure in the previous
post. Are you completely insane?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

[Dan_Cox]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:

> > No I didn't. Your reading comprehension problem has gotten you
> again. What I said (when you started ranting about Indian

casinos) is I haven't been in an Indian casino in over two months.
You really should get those bifocals replaced.

More "NO I DIDN't, NO I DIDN'T's"!!! What a grybaby!! Your the kind
of loser in high school that we enjoyed slapping around just because
you couldn't take it. The girls loved when you fairies begged us to
stop, and they really didn't want us to stop! Your entire problem is
that you run away from the afct that you are controlled by casinos
at every step of your life. You'll go into a rage about how I'm
changing the subject etc. etc. blah blah blah, but the fact remains
that you go to too many casinos for your own good, and you're just
another supposed 'advantage play' addict on the loose with no aim
whatsoever. MAN, I NEVER THOUGHT IT'D FEEL SO GOOD BEING AWAY FROM
THE BEACHES IN KONA!!

>
> NO I DIDN'T NO I DIDN'T. Isn't that just like a nerdy schoolboy
when the real guys are picking on them telling them they did

something stupid again.

Last I checked "real guys" didn't hide behind assumed names, phony
systems and dual ids. You've never been a real man and are

obviously jealous of those that are. Why else would you keep
bringing it up?

Us REAL GUYS make fun of you nerds because you ask for it. Triple
id's, etc. are all assets that you don't understand in your closed
little boring world.

> > > You don't say! Then why did you just round it to $5k when

you should have rounded it to $10k?? Basic math, professor.

> >
> > I didn't round it to "$5k" or "$10K". You're looking foolish
again. You should quit while you're only WAY behind. It will get

worse.

>
> Bozo, you just said it was '$5k' in the last post. Einstein's

round up to the nearest ten-thousand. but not Dick....nope, not when
he gets caught!!

No, I said OVER $5K when referring to my EXACT figure in the

previous post. Are you completely insane?

You just confirmed the fact that you've been contradicting yourself.
What a stooge!

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
>
> > > No I didn't. Your reading comprehension problem has gotten

you

> > again. What I said (when you started ranting about Indian
casinos) is I haven't been in an Indian casino in over two months.
You really should get those bifocals replaced.

More "NO I DIDN't, NO I DIDN'T's"!!!

Just the facts, monkey boy. If you don't like it then quit making
idiotic assertions about things you know nothing about.

What a grybaby!! Your the kind
of loser in high school that we enjoyed slapping around just

because

you couldn't take it. The girls loved when you fairies begged us to
stop, and they really didn't want us to stop!

Grow up monkey boy, you've been out of high school for over 30 years.
By the way, I think this provides a tremendous insight into Robs'
personality. His BEST years were in HS and it's been down hill ever
since.

Your entire problem is
that you run away from the afct that you are controlled by casinos
at every step of your life. You'll go into a rage about how I'm
changing the subject etc. etc. blah blah blah, but the fact remains
that you go to too many casinos for your own good, and you're just
another supposed 'advantage play' addict on the loose with no aim
whatsoever. MAN, I NEVER THOUGHT IT'D FEEL SO GOOD BEING AWAY FROM
THE BEACHES IN KONA!!

You might as well tell EVERY worker in the world that they go to work
far "too many times for your own good". I'm making money and having
fun doing it. I probably should be spending MORE time gambling since
I make money gambling. I can tell this bugs you when you make idiotic
assertions like this one. Get over it.

> >
> > NO I DIDN'T NO I DIDN'T. Isn't that just like a nerdy schoolboy
> when the real guys are picking on them telling them they did
something stupid again.
>
> Last I checked "real guys" didn't hide behind assumed names,

phony

> systems and dual ids. You've never been a real man and are
obviously jealous of those that are. Why else would you keep
bringing it up?

Us REAL GUYS make fun of you nerds because you ask for it.

I know your mama may call you a real guy. The rest of us know that
you are just a loser trying to relive his HS years.

>
> > > > You don't say! Then why did you just round it to $5k when
you should have rounded it to $10k?? Basic math, professor.
> > >
> > > I didn't round it to "$5k" or "$10K". You're looking foolish
> again. You should quit while you're only WAY behind. It will get
worse.
> >
> > Bozo, you just said it was '$5k' in the last post. Einstein's
round up to the nearest ten-thousand. but not Dick....nope, not

when

he gets caught!!
>
> No, I said OVER $5K when referring to my EXACT figure in the
previous post. Are you completely insane?

You just confirmed the fact that you've been contradicting

yourself.

What a stooge!

Wrong again. Everyone else knows there's a difference between OVER 5K
and 5K. Everyone but you, that is. Of course, we all know you aren't
too quick when it comes to anything with numbers.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

[Dan_Cox]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:

> More "NO I DIDN't, NO I DIDN'T's"!!!

Just the facts, monkey boy. If you don't like it then quit making
idiotic assertions about things you know nothing about.

> What a crybaby!! Your the kind
> of loser in high school that we enjoyed slapping around just
because you couldn't take it. The girls loved when you fairies

begged us to stop, and they really didn't want us to stop!

Grow up monkey boy, you've been out of high school for over 30

years. By the way, I think this provides a tremendous insight into
Robs' personality. His BEST years were in HS and it's been down hill
ever since.

I still wanna know how many times the 'cool guys' made you pull your
pants down in ront of the girls in their gym.

You might as well tell EVERY worker in the world that they go to

work far "too many times for your own good". I'm making money and
having fun doing it. I probably should be spending MORE time
gambling since I make money gambling. I can tell this bugs you when
you make idiotic assertions like this one. Get over it.

More painful excuses, and I'm getting closer to your nerves with it.
Easy to see. You aren't working when you play--all you're doing is
following your habitual pathological gambling path. And no one
believes you're ahead by any means. Not by playing as much as you
do. That's like saying the Queen is ahead by ten bucks at this point
in her life.

> > No, I said OVER $5K when referring to my EXACT figure in the
> previous post. Are you completely insane?
>
> You just confirmed the fact that you've been contradicting
yourself. What a stooge!

Wrong again. Everyone else knows there's a difference between OVER

5K and 5K. Everyone but you, that is. Of course, we all know you
aren't too quick when it comes to anything with numbers.

Get real. Nerds like you NEVER pass up an opportunity to post an
exact figure that's meaningless to the rest of the world.

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
>
> > What a crybaby!! Your the kind
> > of loser in high school that we enjoyed slapping around just
> because you couldn't take it. The girls loved when you fairies
begged us to stop, and they really didn't want us to stop!
>
> Grow up monkey boy, you've been out of high school for over 30
years. By the way, I think this provides a tremendous insight into
Robs' personality. His BEST years were in HS and it's been down

hill

ever since.

I still wanna know how many times the 'cool guys' made you pull

your

pants down in ront of the girls in their gym.

You're not even close, monkey boy. I suspect this line of response is
intended to make me think you were "cool". It's more than obvious
from your replies that you were NEVER "cool" and most likely the
victim of this little stunt (or similar ones). Maybe if you just GOT
OVER IT you could make progress in your life. You really need to see
that shrink ...

>
> You might as well tell EVERY worker in the world that they go to
work far "too many times for your own good". I'm making money and
having fun doing it. I probably should be spending MORE time
gambling since I make money gambling. I can tell this bugs you when
you make idiotic assertions like this one. Get over it.

More painful excuses, and I'm getting closer to your nerves with

it.

Easy to see. You aren't working when you play--all you're doing is
following your habitual pathological gambling path.

Explain the difference between working for money and gambling for
money. Your obvious attempt to make anyones gambling into an
addiction is about as lame as it gets. One more example of your never-
ending stupidity.

And no one
believes you're ahead by any means. Not by playing as much as you
do.

I don't care what you believe, never will. Get over it.

> Wrong again. Everyone else knows there's a difference between

OVER

5K and 5K. Everyone but you, that is. Of course, we all know you
aren't too quick when it comes to anything with numbers.

Get real. Nerds like you NEVER pass up an opportunity to post an
exact figure that's meaningless to the rest of the world.

Getting a little testy, monkey boy? If you don't like numbers then
get out of the gambling business. It's all about numbers and always
will be. With your lack of talent in this area it's no wonder you've
been labeled the biggest loser in the business.

[Dan_Cox]

> I still wanna know how many times the 'cool guys' made you pull
your pants down in ront of the girls in their gym.

You're not even close, monkey boy. I suspect this line of response

is intended to make me think you were "cool".

Not in the slightest. It's intended to depict that you were a loser
in life back then, and there's been no progress since.

It's more than obvious

from your replies that you were NEVER "cool" and most likely the
victim of this little stunt (or similar ones). Maybe if you just

GOT OVER IT you could make progress in your life. You really need to
see that shrink ...

You do get kind of wordy defensively once I hit the mark.....

> Easy to see. You aren't working when you play--all you're doing

is following your habitual pathological gambling path.

Explain the difference between working for money and gambling for
money.

Since you don't play for a living, when you gamble (which is an awful
lot) you're supposed to be doing it for recreation (regardless if
it's taken over your life up there). When you worked for a living
(for Management such as myself) you were paid a salary for your
geekiness.

Your obvious attempt to make anyones gambling into an
addiction is about as lame as it gets. One more example of your

never-ending stupidity.

Doesn't happen like that. Read some more on my site and you won't be
making off-the-wall comments. Those who blab about their play all the
time, those who claim to be promotion-chasing zombies, those who brag
about a simple $5k win when it means nothing to anyone other than
them as they comfort themselves from untold losses.....THOSE are the
people who are the addicts of the video-poker playing world. And
there are many just like you.

> And no one
> believes you're ahead by any means. Not by playing as much as you
> do.

I don't care what you believe, never will. Get over it.

There's that whining defense posture again! If you didn't care you
wouldn't be crying about it when I say it.

Getting a little testy, monkey boy? If you don't like numbers then
get out of the gambling business.

I don't much like numbers, but I know how to handle them as well as
anyone when it doesn't much matter, and better than most when it
does. Actually, it could very well be that I'm the best at numbers
since I win more than anyone in video poker. Kind of takes that self-
made crown off your head...

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > I still wanna know how many times the 'cool guys' made you pull
> your pants down in ront of the girls in their gym.
>
> You're not even close, monkey boy. I suspect this line of

response

is intended to make me think you were "cool".

Not in the slightest. It's intended to depict that you were a loser
in life back then, and there's been no progress since.

It's more than obvious
> from your replies that you were NEVER "cool" and most likely the
> victim of this little stunt (or similar ones). Maybe if you just
GOT OVER IT you could make progress in your life. You really need

to

see that shrink ...

You do get kind of wordy defensively once I hit the mark.....

I'm still waiting for you to "hit the mark" ONE time. So far you've
been shut out which really isn't too much of a surprise. I suspect
I'm much closer to the truth here than you'd like to admit.

>
> > Easy to see. You aren't working when you play--all you're doing
is following your habitual pathological gambling path.
>
> Explain the difference between working for money and gambling for
> money.

Since you don't play for a living, when you gamble (which is an

awful

lot) you're supposed to be doing it for recreation (regardless if
it's taken over your life up there). When you worked for a living
(for Management such as myself) you were paid a salary for your
geekiness.

I already told you I HAVE FUN. What is your definition of recreation?
I know, I know, anything that is NOT gambling. In addition, when I
retired I did not necessarily give up making a few extra bucks. So,
I've done some consulting and did some gambling.. Both have been
successful. To a loser like yourself, I suspect that really grates at
you.

>Your obvious attempt to make anyones gambling into an
> addiction is about as lame as it gets. One more example of your
never-ending stupidity.

Doesn't happen like that. Read some more on my site and you won't

be

making off-the-wall comments.

That's a joke, right? I wouldn't read a single sentence on your site.
You've proven to be an imbicile right here, I don't need to see any
more of your ridiculous babble.

Those who blab about their play all the
time, those who claim to be promotion-chasing zombies, those who

brag

about a simple $5k win

No bragging here. I simply answered your assertion that I always lose.
If you don't want to hear the truth, then quit making absurd, moronic
assumptions about things you know nothing about. Wait, that would be
the end of your VP writing now, wouldn't it?

when it means nothing to anyone other than
them as they comfort themselves from untold losses.....THOSE are

the

people who are the addicts of the video-poker playing world. And
there are many just like you.

I see, the hundreds of successful advantage players really grate on
you also. I'll add this one to your never-ending list of idiotic
unproven assertions.
  

> > And no one
> > believes you're ahead by any means. Not by playing as much as

you

> > do.
>
> I don't care what you believe, never will. Get over it.

There's that whining defense posture again! If you didn't care you
wouldn't be crying about it when I say it.

In a previous paragraph you claim I'm bragging, now you claim I'm
whinning. You can't tell the difference, can you? Probably because
you brag with nothing to back it up and you've been a whining loser
all your life.

>
> Getting a little testy, monkey boy? If you don't like numbers

then

> get out of the gambling business.

I don't much like numbers, but I know how to handle them as well as
anyone when it doesn't much matter, and better than most when it
does.

Another joke???

Actually, it could very well be that I'm the best at numbers
since I win more than anyone in video poker. Kind of takes that

self-

made crown off your head...

Nope. Given your track record of lying I wouldn't believe a single
thing you say about your winnings. But even if you've managed to stay
on the LUCKY side for a while, I don't really care. The only reason I
respond is your idiotic claims that ANYONE can win using your
worthless progression. Have I mentioned that before???

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote: