Rumsfeld FINALLY tells the TRUTH

[Dan_Cox]

> > > > > Math models and foolish theories only serve to
> > > > > suppress actuals by those incapable of being successful

and angry about it as well. People like you are completely consumed

by jealousy of others who have found success when you cannot.
You losers win a nickel and lose a dime.
> > > >
> > > > Did I mention I was now at 11 RFs in the last two months.

If results were indeed proof, then I have proved beyond any shadow

> of a doubt that advantage play is the ONLY way to go.
> > >
> > > We don't live in a 2-month world, dicky.
> >
> > Of course you do. If you believe your own results are proof of
> > anything then you can ONLY believe in the SHORT term. You're
> > responses are getting more and more idiotic each time.
>
> My world is comprised of almost 7 years and counting.

No, your results are at least 13 years and counting. However, the
thing you love to avoid is the fact that your play on high denoms

is still completely SHORT TERM.

What play is that? Is dollar and $2 considered 'high denoms' to
someone with 'far more than $700k in the bank but you can't get at
it'? And no, my play is 7 years. 6 years were played before I
understood that advantage play was only a geek theory intended only
to make money from sales for a handful of entrepeneurs.

> Your world is
> one in which intermittent gratification is cause for

uncontrollable blabberring about peanuts, because losers enjoy
peanuts from time to time.

You know nothing about my world. Of course, as we've seen in these
discussions you pretty much know nothing about anything. This has
never stopped you from openning your mouth and looking foolish.

You're so easy to read it's almost pathetic. Old, addicted, and
incapable of enjoying anything other than gambling because it's got
you by the croakies. And did I mention angry and jealous of me. Why?
Because life indeed did pass you by.

Now you're calling machines "stupid"? You think machines have some
intellect? I think moron is getting a little too weak to describe
your thinking.

Machines are all too real to addicts like you.

> because you can't put together any
> semblance of a real life any longer. Video poker has ruined

what's left for you, and even your vacations are completely
controlled by an unstoppable urge to gamble. Not easy reading this,
is it Dicky??

It's sooooo easy ... you are such a complete moron ... you think
calling me names has any effect on me? LMAO. I wonder how many

times you've said almost this exact same BS. Now you know why you
only qualify as a wannabee geek.

We know exactly what bothers you Dicky, and why.

> If you keep your treks up to the smokey casinos, you won't be
around for very many more tombstone readings--let alone mine.

Spoken by a TRUE addict that has spent a good part of the last 13
years (or more) in casinos. It's that projected self image coming
through again. It's so obvious.

More Pee Wee. You're such a phony.

   
You continue to deny that statistics is major part of the world?
Well, here's a little education for the wannabee geek. The flow of
electricity, the movement of air around you, the chemical processes
in your body, the very basics of all the known forces are described
using statistical techniques. The SAME techniques used to describe
the overall results of VP. I think that pretty qualifies for how

the world operates and, once again, demonstrates that you are a
complete idiot.

More telltale signs that you will talk yourself into believing
ANYTHING that has an outside chance of justifying your compulsion to
play video poker nearly non-stop.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

[Dan_Cox]

> > > I see it's tough to confront your own inner demons. More
denial.
> >
> > Your projected self image is showing through again. If ever
anyone was in denial it's the monkey boy.
>
> More Pee Wee.

I see I hit a touchy area. However, you will get no pity from this
corner. I've told you more than once you should get professional
help. It's up to you now.

Sounds like you got hit again in the casinos today. One always
wonders where you go in between posts (other than stuffing your
face). I know....and i know why you ought to get that hives medicine
out once again!

> Stats work--only they don't mean anything until after the fact.

ROTFLMAO. Do you actually try to sound idiotic? Everything

electronic

item sitting in front of you is there ONLY because of statistical
techniques applied BEFORE the fact. My God, you say the dumbest
things without even blinking an eye.

That's to geeks. To real people who have the money to buy those
electronic things, we don't care one iota about theory and
probabilities of them working. They only need to work or we get
something else that does. It's called the 'real world', and it was
made for us to live in and you to worry about the 'stats'.

> And if you stopped denying that you are addicted to
> the game, you wouldn't have to keep on saying I'm denying

something in reply simply because you have no intelligent response.
Like Pee Wee. Maybe we can begin calling you 'Pee Wee Dicky'? Imagine

carrying that name when you were younger (HAHA--maybe you DID!).

Could be why you're so bitter these days.

The monkey boy is left saying the same garbage over and over again.
You don't have much creativity, do you? Not surprising from someone
who's life still revolves around his HS years over 30 years in the
past.

I get it. You parrot the Queen, who says she plays 20 hours a week
for FUN only and is not addicted....because she doesn't want her
subjects to stop buying her junk. You've now taken on the semblance
of a fallen hero, only you've nowhere to go.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > > > > > Math models and foolish theories only serve to
> > > > > > suppress actuals by those incapable of being successful
and angry about it as well. People like you are completely consumed
> by jealousy of others who have found success when you cannot.
> You losers win a nickel and lose a dime.
> > > > >
> > > > > Did I mention I was now at 11 RFs in the last two months.
If results were indeed proof, then I have proved beyond any shadow
> > of a doubt that advantage play is the ONLY way to go.
> > > >
> > > > We don't live in a 2-month world, dicky.
> > >
> > > Of course you do. If you believe your own results are proof

of

> > > anything then you can ONLY believe in the SHORT term. You're
> > > responses are getting more and more idiotic each time.
> >
> > My world is comprised of almost 7 years and counting.
>
> No, your results are at least 13 years and counting. However, the
> thing you love to avoid is the fact that your play on high denoms
is still completely SHORT TERM.

What play is that?

The highest denom an individual plays. Doesn't matter what the amount
is.

>
> > Your world is
> > one in which intermittent gratification is cause for
uncontrollable blabberring about peanuts, because losers enjoy
peanuts from time to time.
>
> You know nothing about my world. Of course, as we've seen in

these

> discussions you pretty much know nothing about anything. This has
> never stopped you from openning your mouth and looking foolish.

You're so easy to read it's almost pathetic. Old, addicted, and
incapable of enjoying anything other than gambling because it's got
you by the croakies. And did I mention angry and jealous of me.

You're repeating yourself again, monkey boy. Give it up and go get
some professional help. They can help you get rid of the hate that
runs your life.

Why?
Because life indeed did pass you by.

I really don't like telling you that I've had (and continue to have)
a very good life. It must hurt someone like you that clearly has
missed out for at least 30 years. However, that can stop now. Go get
professional help.

>
> > because you can't put together any
> > semblance of a real life any longer. Video poker has ruined
what's left for you, and even your vacations are completely
controlled by an unstoppable urge to gamble. Not easy reading this,
is it Dicky??
>
> It's sooooo easy ... you are such a complete moron ... you think
> calling me names has any effect on me? LMAO. I wonder how many
times you've said almost this exact same BS. Now you know why you
only qualify as a wannabee geek.

We know exactly what bothers you Dicky, and why.

You know nothing about me and it irritates you to no end. It comes
across in almost all of your posts. However, if you go get that
professional help it won't matter to you anymore.

>
> > If you keep your treks up to the smokey casinos, you won't be
> around for very many more tombstone readings--let alone mine.
>
> Spoken by a TRUE addict that has spent a good part of the last 13
> years (or more) in casinos. It's that projected self image coming
> through again. It's so obvious.

More Pee Wee. You're such a phony.

I realize that it hurts when I accurately describe your life.
However, if you get that help, even you can learn to live a happy and
content life.

>
> You continue to deny that statistics is major part of the world?
> Well, here's a little education for the wannabee geek. The flow

of

> electricity, the movement of air around you, the chemical

processes

> in your body, the very basics of all the known forces are

described

> using statistical techniques. The SAME techniques used to

describe

> the overall results of VP. I think that pretty qualifies for how
the world operates and, once again, demonstrates that you are a
complete idiot.

More telltale signs that you will talk yourself into believing
ANYTHING that has an outside chance of justifying your compulsion

to

play video poker nearly non-stop.

I see, once again, that the facts have left you without anything
concrete to say. You should take this to heart and realize that if
you let go of your ego and seek professional help, you won't put
yourself in an impossible situation as you have in our discussions.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > > > I see it's tough to confront your own inner demons. More
> denial.
> > >
> > > Your projected self image is showing through again. If ever
> anyone was in denial it's the monkey boy.
> >
> > More Pee Wee.
>
> I see I hit a touchy area. However, you will get no pity from

this

> corner. I've told you more than once you should get professional
> help. It's up to you now.

Sounds like you got hit again in the casinos today. One always
wonders where you go in between posts (other than stuffing your
face). I know....and i know why you ought to get that hives

medicine

out once again!

I'm really trying to help you out here. You have nothing to gain in
these discussions as I've already proven your system is a fraud and
you will lie forever to protect your ego. Go get help right away.

>
> > Stats work--only they don't mean anything until after the fact.
>
> ROTFLMAO. Do you actually try to sound idiotic? Everything
electronic
> item sitting in front of you is there ONLY because of statistical
> techniques applied BEFORE the fact. My God, you say the dumbest
> things without even blinking an eye.

That's to geeks. To real people who have the money to buy those
electronic things, we don't care one iota about theory and
probabilities of them working. They only need to work or we get
something else that does. It's called the 'real world', and it was
made for us to live in and you to worry about the 'stats'.

That's wonderful. You now agree that 'stats' work "before the fact",
which is exactly the opposite of what you claimed previously. Don't
you see how you've trapped yourself in lie after lie just to protect
your ego? Go get help.

>
> > And if you stopped denying that you are addicted to
> > the game, you wouldn't have to keep on saying I'm denying
something in reply simply because you have no intelligent response.
Like Pee Wee. Maybe we can begin calling you 'Pee Wee Dicky'?

Imagine

> carrying that name when you were younger (HAHA--maybe you DID!).
Could be why you're so bitter these days.
>
> The monkey boy is left saying the same garbage over and over

again.

> You don't have much creativity, do you? Not surprising from

someone

> who's life still revolves around his HS years over 30 years in

the

> past.

I get it. You parrot the Queen, who says she plays 20 hours a week
for FUN only and is not addicted....because she doesn't want her
subjects to stop buying her junk. You've now taken on the semblance
of a fallen hero, only you've nowhere to go.

I don't "parrot" anyone. I give you the facts straight up. You
continue to deny these facts in order to protect your ego. Let it go.
Get help. Release the hate and learn to be happy.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

[Dan_Cox]

> > > My world is comprised of almost 7 years and counting.
> >
> > No, your results are at least 13 years and counting. However,

the thing you love to avoid is the fact that your play on high denoms

> is still completely SHORT TERM.
>
> What play is that?

The highest denom an individual plays. Doesn't matter what the

amount is.

That shows what a limited understanding of my play strategies you
have and why you contradict yourseld all the time when you make
believe you're an analytical type who goes by a strict yet neurotic
set of standards. The highest denomination I've played is $100, but
that play conprises far less than 1% of my total hands. On average,
I'm a $2 player, and if I were a so-called advantage player and I
didn't use a winning progression in my strategies, then I'd likely be
a $5 player for lack of understanding on how to truly win.

> > > Your world is
> > > one in which intermittent gratification is cause for
> uncontrollable blabberring about peanuts, because losers enjoy
> peanuts from time to time.
> >
> > You know nothing about my world. Of course, as we've seen in
these discussions you pretty much know nothing about anything. This

has never stopped you from openning your mouth and looking foolish.

>
> You're so easy to read it's almost pathetic. Old, addicted, and
> incapable of enjoying anything other than gambling because it's

got you by the croakies. And did I mention angry and jealous of me.

You're repeating yourself again, monkey boy. Give it up and go get
some professional help. They can help you get rid of the hate that
runs your life.

> Why?
> Because life indeed did pass you by.

I really don't like telling you that I've had (and continue to

have) a very good life.

I guess it can be said that what is a flop-of-a-life to one can be a
very good life for another. Now I understand.

I realize that it hurts when I accurately describe your life.
However, if you get that help, even you can learn to live a happy

and content life.

I've written about nearly every aspect of my life and family that I
can in my articles and books for everyone to clearly read and see,
and my publishers have been to my home and verified much of what I've
said. All I do here is reiterrate those facts--to your utmost dismay
I see. You're accuracy, although never clearly stated, seems a bit
off (as usual).

    
> > You continue to deny that statistics is major part of the

world?

> > Well, here's a little education for the wannabee geek. The flow
of
> > electricity, the movement of air around you, the chemical
processes
> > in your body, the very basics of all the known forces are
described
> > using statistical techniques. The SAME techniques used to
describe
> > the overall results of VP. I think that pretty qualifies for

how

> the world operates and, once again, demonstrates that you are a
> complete idiot.
>
> More telltale signs that you will talk yourself into believing
> ANYTHING that has an outside chance of justifying your compulsion
to play video poker nearly non-stop.

I see, once again, that the facts have left you without anything
concrete to say. You should take this to heart and realize that if
you let go of your ego and seek professional help, you won't put
yourself in an impossible situation as you have in our discussions.

I enjoy a strong ego. It's a trait winners have in addition to being
well-liked for it. And I also understand your denial of the
compulsion that controls your life. You don't like to discuss it any
further than ignoring it and saying i haven't anything to say. It's
soooo obvious and you know it. I won't play around with suggesting
you get professional help, because at your age, you're too far gone
and there's nothing that can or will help.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

[Dan_Cox]

> >
> Sounds like you got hit again in the casinos today. One always
> wonders where you go in between posts (other than stuffing your
> face). I know....and I know why you ought to get that hives
medicine out once again!

I'm really trying to help you out here. You have nothing to gain in
these discussions as I've already proven your system is a fraud and
you will lie forever to protect your ego. Go get help right away.

Now there's a leaky response. Might as well say you've run out of
mealy-mouthed words to type. You can still use 'obfuscate' can't you?

> > ROTFLMAO. Do you actually try to sound idiotic? Everything
> electronic
> > item sitting in front of you is there ONLY because of

statistical

> > techniques applied BEFORE the fact. My God, you say the dumbest
> > things without even blinking an eye.
>
> That's to geeks. To real people who have the money to buy those
> electronic things, we don't care one iota about theory and
> probabilities of them working. They only need to work or we get
> something else that does. It's called the 'real world', and it

was made for us to live in and you to worry about the 'stats'.

That's wonderful. You now agree that 'stats' work "before the

fact", which is exactly the opposite of what you claimed previously.
Don't you see how you've trapped yourself in lie after lie just to
protect your ego? Go get help.

You're still making things up I see. Somehow you manufactured that
into saying I believe stats works beforehand...or something obscure
like that. The bottom line with all your nonsense is how to live
life. You worry about all the stats and I couldn't care less. I enjoy
the real world as it really is while you paddle upstream fighting
against a mythical and theoretical world of probabilities. That's
also the difference between a winner and a loser.

> I get it. You parrot the Queen, who says she plays 20 hours a

week for FUN only and is not addicted....because she doesn't want her

> subjects to stop buying her junk. You've now taken on the

semblance of a fallen hero, only you've nowhere to go.

I don't "parrot" anyone. I give you the facts straight up. You
continue to deny these facts in order to protect your ego. Let it

go. Get help. Release the hate and learn to be happy.

You're so taken in by the ramblings of those who came before you that
you don't even realize how stupid you sound when you deny everything
truthful others see about you. Fact: You were extremely jealous of
those who wrote vp programs and soaked the playing public for profits
that you decided to write some stupid, meaningless one eye jacks wild
program just to make believe you're as good as them--regardless of
the fact that you were either too lazy or too dumb to put it on the
market. A failure is a failure, and nowhere can we ever find the
caliber of failures than with geeks.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > > > My world is comprised of almost 7 years and counting.
> > >
> > > No, your results are at least 13 years and counting. However,
the thing you love to avoid is the fact that your play on high

denoms

> > is still completely SHORT TERM.
> >
> > What play is that?
>
> The highest denom an individual plays. Doesn't matter what the
amount is.
>
That shows what a limited understanding of my play strategies

Actually, it shows a good understand of your worthless strategies.
What your repsonse demonstrates is poor reading comprehension.

you
have and why you contradict yourseld all the time when you make
believe you're an analytical type who goes by a strict yet neurotic
set of standards. The highest denomination I've played is $100, but
that play conprises far less than 1% of my total hands. On average,
I'm a $2 player, and if I were a so-called advantage player and I
didn't use a winning progression in my strategies, then I'd likely

be

a $5 player for lack of understanding on how to truly win.

Thank you for VERIFYING my point. Your play at the highest denoms is
still short term and the ONLY reason you are ahead. It should be a
red flag to anyone considering your system that you don't even
understand this obvious point.

> > > > Your world is
> > > > one in which intermittent gratification is cause for
> > uncontrollable blabberring about peanuts, because losers enjoy
> > peanuts from time to time.
> > >
> > > You know nothing about my world. Of course, as we've seen in
> these discussions you pretty much know nothing about anything.

This

has never stopped you from openning your mouth and looking foolish.
> >
> > You're so easy to read it's almost pathetic. Old, addicted, and
> > incapable of enjoying anything other than gambling because it's
got you by the croakies. And did I mention angry and jealous of me.
>
> You're repeating yourself again, monkey boy. Give it up and go

get

> some professional help. They can help you get rid of the hate

that

> runs your life.
>
> > Why?
> > Because life indeed did pass you by.
>
> I really don't like telling you that I've had (and continue to
have) a very good life.

I guess it can be said that what is a flop-of-a-life to one can be

a

very good life for another. Now I understand.

Not likely, now go get that help.

> I realize that it hurts when I accurately describe your life.
> However, if you get that help, even you can learn to live a happy
and content life.

I've written about nearly every aspect of my life and family that I
can in my articles and books for everyone to clearly read and see,

With your tendency to lie and lie I doubt you'll get anyone to
believe what you write is truthful.

and my publishers have been to my home and verified much of what

I've

said.

No one can verify what goes on within someones' home by making a
simple visit. What an idiotic statement. Go get some help.

All I do here is reiterrate those facts--to your utmost dismay
I see. You're accuracy, although never clearly stated, seems a bit
off (as usual).

You know you need help. It's obvious to me and anyone who reads your
angry, hate-filled posts. Now, go get some help.

>
> > > You continue to deny that statistics is major part of the
world?
> > > Well, here's a little education for the wannabee geek. The

flow

> of
> > > electricity, the movement of air around you, the chemical
> processes
> > > in your body, the very basics of all the known forces are
> described
> > > using statistical techniques. The SAME techniques used to
> describe
> > > the overall results of VP. I think that pretty qualifies for
how
> > the world operates and, once again, demonstrates that you are a
> > complete idiot.
> >
> > More telltale signs that you will talk yourself into believing
> > ANYTHING that has an outside chance of justifying your

compulsion

> to play video poker nearly non-stop.
>
> I see, once again, that the facts have left you without anything
> concrete to say. You should take this to heart and realize that

if

> you let go of your ego and seek professional help, you won't put
> yourself in an impossible situation as you have in our

discussions.

I enjoy a strong ego.

The ego is ONLY one of your problems. The hate inside you is the
primarly reason you should seek help.

It's a trait winners have in addition to being
well-liked for it.

I guess it didn't work for you. Unless, you consider everyone calling
you a idiot as evidence that they like you.

And I also understand your denial of the
compulsion that controls your life.

I explained addiction to you in detail and you had nothing to counter
my descriptions but more chest beating.

You don't like to discuss it any
further than ignoring it

I'd be more than happy to discuss addiction with someone who had a
brain instead of significant mental problems.

and saying i haven't anything to say. It's
soooo obvious and you know it. I won't play around with suggesting
you get professional help, because at your age, you're too far gone
and there's nothing that can or will help.

Reread your last post. See the hate pouring out of you? No one is too
far gone to get help. Use some of that big money to talk HONESTLY
with a psychiatrist. It can help you.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

[Dan_Cox]

> > The highest denom an individual plays. Doesn't matter what the
> amount is.
> >
> That shows what a limited understanding of my play strategies

Actually, it shows a good understand of your worthless strategies.
What your repsonse demonstrates is poor reading comprehension.

What you say is akin to making believe you know something when you
don't. You're very good at that and it would be worth something in
the low-life circles of you and your fellow 'advantage' video poker
players, but it kind of doesn't make it with someone like me--who
uncovers and exposes your weakest inner fears time after time.

> you
> have and why you contradict yourseld all the time when you make
> believe you're an analytical type who goes by a strict yet

neurotic

> set of standards. The highest denomination I've played is $100,

but

> that play conprises far less than 1% of my total hands. On

average,

> I'm a $2 player, and if I were a so-called advantage player and I
> didn't use a winning progression in my strategies, then I'd

likely

be
> a $5 player for lack of understanding on how to truly win.

Thank you for VERIFYING my point. Your play at the highest denoms

is still short term and the ONLY reason you are ahead. It should be a

red flag to anyone considering your system that you don't even
understand this obvious point.

Anything I say would verify your negative mind. Every bit of my play
is short-term. Every session is an average of 5 hours or less, and I
may play maybe once every two weeks. Short term is the ONLY way to
play. You ought to know that by now and I suspect you do.

> >
> > I really don't like telling you that I've had (and continue to
> have) a very good life.
>
> I guess it can be said that what is a flop-of-a-life to one can

be a very good life for another. Now I understand.

Let's leave that in there for a higher irritation factor.

> I've written about nearly every aspect of my life and family that

I can in my articles and books for everyone to clearly read and see,

With your tendency to lie and lie I doubt you'll get anyone to
believe what you write is truthful.

How many times have I mentioned that my publisher came with me to my
banks and verified withdrawals and mostly larger deposits as often as
I said I played. And he also went with me on several winning
sessions. You only say I lie because you want it to be that I do. You
can't live with the fact that I've defeated the vp machines in a way
that's off the scale of your stupid theories.

> and my publishers have been to my home and verified much of what
I've said.

No one can verify what goes on within someones' home by making a
simple visit. What an idiotic statement. Go get some help.

Oh. We went from the one here to the one in Hawaii--all on my nickel.
What he saw when in my home was a happy, healthy, energetic family.
Quite a different picture than you're used to, hey?

> I enjoy a strong ego.

The ego is ONLY one of your problems. The hate inside you is the
primarly reason you should seek help.

> It's a trait winners have in addition to being
> well-liked for it.

I guess it didn't work for you. Unless, you consider everyone

calling you a idiot as evidence that they like you.

It also doesn't work for every other advantage player who does not
have extreme and consistent good luck.

> And I also understand your denial of the
> compulsion that controls your life.

I explained addiction to you in detail and you had nothing to

counter my descriptions but more chest beating.

You conveniently 'explained it away' when it came to you. That's
spelled a clear D-E-N-I-A-L.

> You don't like to discuss it any
> further than ignoring it

I'd be more than happy to discuss addiction with someone who had a
brain instead of significant mental problems.

Your problem with me is that I have several legs up on you on
virtually every subject, and the only way you can get involved is to
take a big initial step then start in with the cloud machine. It
ALWAYS happens. And it's also why you look so ignorant and lost.

> and saying i haven't anything to say. It's
> soooo obvious and you know it. I won't play around with

suggesting you get professional help, because at your age, you're too
far gone and there's nothing that can or will help.

Reread your last post. See the hate pouring out of you? No one is

too far gone to get help. Use some of that big money to talk HONESTLY

with a psychiatrist. It can help you.

To you it depicts hate because I'm that far a more intelligent and
sensible mind to you, and that rattles you no end. I call it
superiority, and you translate that into the hate you have for me.
And I love it!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > > The highest denom an individual plays. Doesn't matter what

the

> > amount is.
> > >
> > That shows what a limited understanding of my play strategies
>
> Actually, it shows a good understand of your worthless

strategies.

> What your repsonse demonstrates is poor reading comprehension.

What you say is akin to making believe you know something when you
don't. You're very good at that and it would be worth something in
the low-life circles of you and your fellow 'advantage' video poker
players, but it kind of doesn't make it with someone like me--who
uncovers and exposes your weakest inner fears time after time.

Translation ... I was exactly right. You can always tell when the
monkey boy attitude appears. Robs' ego won't let him say, "yeah,
you're right", so he puffs up his monkey boy chest and spews trash.

>
> > you
> > have and why you contradict yourseld all the time when you make
> > believe you're an analytical type who goes by a strict yet
neurotic
> > set of standards. The highest denomination I've played is $100,
but
> > that play conprises far less than 1% of my total hands. On
average,
> > I'm a $2 player, and if I were a so-called advantage player and

I

> > didn't use a winning progression in my strategies, then I'd
likely
> be
> > a $5 player for lack of understanding on how to truly win.
>
> Thank you for VERIFYING my point. Your play at the highest denoms
is still short term and the ONLY reason you are ahead. It should be

a

> red flag to anyone considering your system that you don't even
> understand this obvious point.

Anything I say would verify your negative mind. Every bit of my

play

is short-term.

13 or even 7 years of play is NOT short term. But, 1-5% of 7 years IS
short term.

Every session is an average of 5 hours or less, and I
may play maybe once every two weeks. Short term is the ONLY way to
play. You ought to know that by now and I suspect you do.

You session times and play amount is meaningless unless addition in
Robs' world works differently than the rest of the universe.

>
> > >
> > > I really don't like telling you that I've had (and continue

to

> > have) a very good life.
> >
> > I guess it can be said that what is a flop-of-a-life to one can
be a very good life for another. Now I understand.
>
Let's leave that in there for a higher irritation factor.

> > I've written about nearly every aspect of my life and family

that

I can in my articles and books for everyone to clearly read and see,
>
> With your tendency to lie and lie I doubt you'll get anyone to
> believe what you write is truthful.

How many times have I mentioned that my publisher came with me to

my

banks and verified withdrawals and mostly larger deposits as often

as

I said I played. And he also went with me on several winning
sessions. You only say I lie because you want it to be that I do.

You

can't live with the fact that I've defeated the vp machines in a

way

that's off the scale of your stupid theories.

I'm sure the same story could be made by a lottery winner. Means
absolutely nothing. Of course, you know that. You keep up this fraud
because you think it makes you look important. It doesn't, monkey
boy. Oh, did you forget that your wonderful publisher has been shown
to publish copyrighted material without permission? A great reference
if I ever saw one ... Birds of a feather?

>
> > and my publishers have been to my home and verified much of

what

> I've said.
>
> No one can verify what goes on within someones' home by making a
> simple visit. What an idiotic statement. Go get some help.

Oh. We went from the one here to the one in Hawaii--all on my

nickel.

What he saw when in my home was a happy, healthy, energetic family.
Quite a different picture than you're used to, hey?

More BS from the BS master. Let's hear it in your publisher words.
Otherwise, it means absolutely nothing coming from a continual liar
and fraud.

>
> > I enjoy a strong ego.
>
> The ego is ONLY one of your problems. The hate inside you is the
> primarly reason you should seek help.
>
> > It's a trait winners have in addition to being
> > well-liked for it.
>
> I guess it didn't work for you. Unless, you consider everyone
calling you a idiot as evidence that they like you.

It also doesn't work for every other advantage player who does not
have extreme and consistent good luck.

Another unproven assertion. If your going to bellow out profuse BS
please do it somewhere else. Otherwise show proof.

>
> > And I also understand your denial of the
> > compulsion that controls your life.
>
> I explained addiction to you in detail and you had nothing to
counter my descriptions but more chest beating.

You conveniently 'explained it away' when it came to you. That's
spelled a clear D-E-N-I-A-L.

You ask me to explain addiction and when I do, you call it denial.
Could it ever be more obvious to even the most casual viewwer that
you dred actually discussing addiction. It would take away one of
your childish name calling avenues.

>
> > You don't like to discuss it any
> > further than ignoring it
>
> I'd be more than happy to discuss addiction with someone who had

a

> brain instead of significant mental problems.

Your problem with me is that I have several legs up on you on
virtually every subject,

You mean like the political discussion where you've been so beaten
into the ground that you are now claiming you didn't read certain
posts? Your legs are up alright. I think everyone can picture it.

and the only way you can get involved is to
take a big initial step then start in with the cloud machine. It
ALWAYS happens. And it's also why you look so ignorant and lost.

I'm not suprised that you think clouds are made by machines. It goes
right up your intellectual alley. However, if you ever want to get
back to facts again, just let me know. By the way, have you called
that doctor yet?

>
> > and saying i haven't anything to say. It's
> > soooo obvious and you know it. I won't play around with
suggesting you get professional help, because at your age, you're

too

far gone and there's nothing that can or will help.
>
> Reread your last post. See the hate pouring out of you? No one is
too far gone to get help. Use some of that big money to talk

HONESTLY

> with a psychiatrist. It can help you.

To you it depicts hate because I'm that far a more intelligent and
sensible mind to you, and that rattles you no end. I call it
superiority, and you translate that into the hate you have for me.
And I love it!!

More monkey boy bravado. It comes out everytime you are lost for
words. I don't need to respond to it because it means nothing to me
and everyone sees it for exactly what it is. FEAR and HATE. Go get
help and you can thank me when your done.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

[pesach_kremen]

I don't know why this thread drags on and on, and on, and on. There is simply no way, and it can be mathematically proven to turn a negative expectation game in to a positive expectation game byany betting method or play method whatsoever. Moving up in denomination until you hit your 4 of a kind may work most of the time, but in the end, you final outcome will be close to the expected value per hand times hte number of hands played. Of course if you hav ebeen unusually lucky along the way, you may have won so much $$$$ that you will never have enough play time remaining to lose it back, but any system that fails to recognize the math of the game is doomed to failure.

As to problem gambling, the figure might be 3% or so, but their is an honest distortion here. Many will not reach the level of problem gambling and will stop short of not paying their bills, but there are many who gamble to the point wher eit does effect their lifestyle. For example, due gambling losses they may not buy the steaks they were planning to buy at the grocery but may buy fish instead (might be healthier in this instance, lol) or they may cancel the decision to buy the new table for their kitchen, etc.

I do think that Rob Singer's idea of having loss limits is wprthy of consideration though, not fromt he point of making a profit as with his system it is mathematically impossible to do so, unless only positive expectation games are played (or less than such with comps putting you in positive territory), and with proper play of course, but it does keep one form losing it all NOW. But the idea of hgoing up, and up and up to win is very dangerour, even if the amount is limited. How many 10K loss days can even Rob Singer absorb? The strategies advanced by Dan Paymar, Bob Dancer, the late Lenny Frome, Jean Scott, Stanford Wong, ect played at levels one is comforteable with have been proven to be profiteable in the long run and do work. They are based on sound mathematical principles.

···

From: "rgmustain" <rgmustain@att.net>
Reply-To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FREEvpFREE] Re: Will monkey boy FINALLY tell the TRUTH
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 15:57:25 -0000

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> >
> > > I'm believing you recently won something or else you wouldn't
be
> so pumped up when normally you are not. Not unlike every other
addict
> > on the planet either. You're in a fine "winning" group. Yes you
> > are.....
> >
> > I see you still don't understand addiction. Do I need to spell it
> out
> > for you again. The best estimates put gambling addiction at no
more
> > than 3%. I can repeat this for you if you'd like. 3%. It is quite
> > interesting that most experts state that avoidance is the only
way
> to lick this addiction. In addition, you state you were once
addicted
> > and yet you still gamble. Puts it all in perspective ...
>
> I've recently seen on the Internet where that figure you toss
around
> is closer to 29%.

Was that something you posted? Probably. If you don't back up your
ridiculous assertions with some evidence then spare us.

> But I don't care about it anyway. 3% or 29%--You're
> in there and you know it.

More projected self-image ... It's so obvious.

> Maybe some day, if you ever choose a method
> of play that's successful,

I did, it's called advantage play. I've won ever since I analyzed the
approach and found it stands on technical merits. No need for anyone
to claim good or bad results. The system not only works, but is the
ONLY approach that will work. All other systems are dependent on LUCK
and nothing else.

[rgmustain]

All this has already been covered. Facts have no effect on Rob. He
will lie forever to protect his fraudulent system, hence, the name of
the thread.

Nice try anyway.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "pesach kremen"
<royalflush2222@h...> wrote:

I don't know why this thread drags on and on, and on, and on.

There is

simply no way, and it can be mathematically proven to turn a

negative

expectation game in to a positive expectation game byany betting

method or

play method whatsoever. Moving up in denomination until you hit

your 4 of a

kind may work most of the time, but in the end, you final outcome

will be

close to the expected value per hand times hte number of hands

played. Of

course if you hav ebeen unusually lucky along the way, you may have

won so

much $$$$ that you will never have enough play time remaining to

lose it

back, but any system that fails to recognize the math of the game

is doomed

to failure.

As to problem gambling, the figure might be 3% or so, but their is

an honest

distortion here. Many will not reach the level of problem gambling

and will

stop short of not paying their bills, but there are many who gamble

to the

point wher eit does effect their lifestyle. For example, due

gambling losses

they may not buy the steaks they were planning to buy at the

grocery but may

buy fish instead (might be healthier in this instance, lol) or they

may

cancel the decision to buy the new table for their kitchen, etc.

I do think that Rob Singer's idea of having loss limits is wprthy

of

consideration though, not fromt he point of making a profit as with

his

system it is mathematically impossible to do so, unless only

positive

expectation games are played (or less than such with comps putting

you in

positive territory), and with proper play of course, but it does

keep one

form losing it all NOW. But the idea of hgoing up, and up and up

to win is

very dangerour, even if the amount is limited. How many 10K loss

days can

even Rob Singer absorb? The strategies advanced by Dan Paymar, Bob

Dancer,

the late Lenny Frome, Jean Scott, Stanford Wong, ect played at

levels one is

comforteable with have been proven to be profiteable in the long

run and do

work. They are based on sound mathematical principles.

>From: "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
>Reply-To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
>To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [FREEvpFREE] Re: Will monkey boy FINALLY tell the TRUTH
>Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 15:57:25 -0000
>
>
> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
>wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm believing you recently won something or else you

wouldn't

>be
> > so pumped up when normally you are not. Not unlike every other
>addict
> > > on the planet either. You're in a fine "winning" group. Yes

you

> > > are.....
> > >
> > > I see you still don't understand addiction. Do I need to

spell it

> > out
> > > for you again. The best estimates put gambling addiction at no
>more
> > > than 3%. I can repeat this for you if you'd like. 3%. It is

quite

> > > interesting that most experts state that avoidance is the only
>way
> > to lick this addiction. In addition, you state you were once
>addicted
> > > and yet you still gamble. Puts it all in perspective ...
> >
> > I've recently seen on the Internet where that figure you toss
>around
> > is closer to 29%.
>
>Was that something you posted? Probably. If you don't back up your
>ridiculous assertions with some evidence then spare us.
>
> > But I don't care about it anyway. 3% or 29%--You're
> > in there and you know it.
>
>More projected self-image ... It's so obvious.
>
> > Maybe some day, if you ever choose a method
> > of play that's successful,
>
>I did, it's called advantage play. I've won ever since I analyzed

the

>approach and found it stands on technical merits. No need for

anyone

>to claim good or bad results. The system not only works, but is the
>ONLY approach that will work. All other systems are dependent on

LUCK

···

>--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
>and nothing else.
>
>
>
>

[Dan_Cox]

> > Actually, it shows a good understand of your worthless
strategies. What your repsonse demonstrates is poor reading

comprehension.

>
> What you say is akin to making believe you know something when

you don't. You're very good at that and it would be worth something
in the low-life circles of you and your fellow 'advantage' video
poker players, but it kind of doesn't make it with someone like me--
who uncovers and exposes your weakest inner fears time after time.

Translation ... I was exactly right. You can always tell when the
monkey boy attitude appears. Robs' ego won't let him say, "yeah,
you're right", so he puffs up his monkey boy chest and spews trash.

A spin on what I just said about you. Have you no ability to
adequately respond to anything any longer? Another bad day at the
machines while others up there were up in the mountains enjoying life
with their families??

I didn't use a winning progression in my strategies, then I'd

> likely
> > be
> > > a $5 player for lack of understanding on how to truly win.
> >
> > Thank you for VERIFYING my point. Your play at the highest

denoms

> is still short term and the ONLY reason you are ahead. It should

be

a
> > red flag to anyone considering your system that you don't even
> > understand this obvious point.
>
> Anything I say would verify your negative mind. Every bit of my
play is short-term.

13 or even 7 years of play is NOT short term. But, 1-5% of 7 years

IS short term.

More anal statistics that make zero sense? What a fool you continue
to show the word you are.

> Every session is an average of 5 hours or less, and I
> may play maybe once every two weeks. Short term is the ONLY way

to play. You ought to know that by now and I suspect you do.

You session times and play amount is meaningless unless addition in
Robs' world works differently than the rest of the universe.

Like I said, you know it's true, but this time YOUR geek ego won't
allow you to capitulate.

> > > I guess it can be said that what is a flop-of-a-life to one

can be a very good life for another. Now I understand.

> >
> Let's leave that in there for a higher irritation factor.
>
> > > I've written about nearly every aspect of my life and family
that
> I can in my articles and books for everyone to clearly read and

see,

> >
> > With your tendency to lie and lie I doubt you'll get anyone to
> > believe what you write is truthful.
>
> How many times have I mentioned that my publisher came with me to
my banks and verified withdrawals and mostly larger deposits as

often as I said I played. And he also went with me on several winning

> sessions. You only say I lie because you want it to be that I do.
You can't live with the fact that I've defeated the vp machines in

a way that's off the scale of your stupid theories.

I'm sure the same story could be made by a lottery winner. Means
absolutely nothing. Of course, you know that. You keep up this

fraud

because you think it makes you look important. It doesn't, monkey
boy. Oh, did you forget that your wonderful publisher has been

shown to publish copyrighted material without permission? A great
reference if I ever saw one ... Birds of a feather?

You keep inserting the dumb theory of lottery winners because you
can't answer the point sensibly. Clouding it with illogic won't
change the fact that it's all so far over your old head that even
Cocoon couldn't help you out. And BTW--show proof about my
publisher....once you figure out which of the three I'm talking
about. You can put your pants back up now.....

> > No one can verify what goes on within someones' home by making

a simple visit. What an idiotic statement. Go get some help.

>
> Oh. We went from the one here to the one in Hawaii--all on my
nickel. What he saw when in my home was a happy, healthy, energetic

family. Quite a different picture than you're used to, hey?

More BS from the BS master. Let's hear it in your publisher words.
Otherwise, it means absolutely nothing coming from a continual liar
and fraud.

You believe nothing that you don't want to even if it's notarized and
in front of you with the Pope blessing it. Such a sour life you are
cursed with.

> It also doesn't work for every other advantage player who does

not have extreme and consistent good luck.

Another unproven assertion. If your going to bellow out profuse BS
please do it somewhere else. Otherwise show proof.

After you show proof who those theoretical 'hundreds of winning
advantage players' are. Bet you can't!

> > > And I also understand your denial of the
> > > compulsion that controls your life.
> >
> > I explained addiction to you in detail and you had nothing to
> counter my descriptions but more chest beating.
>
> You conveniently 'explained it away' when it came to you. That's
> spelled a clear D-E-N-I-A-L.

You ask me to explain addiction and when I do, you call it denial.

That's because you refuse to answer my question without being
nebulous. I asked you to explain YOUR addiction, and you cloud it up
with whatever comes along (albeit slowly) in that aging mind of yours.

Could it ever be more obvious to even the most casual viewwer that
you dred actually discussing addiction. It would take away one of
your childish name calling avenues.

More denial in the form of an attack. If a book on you were in front
of me I couldn't read you any better than I am now.

> Your problem with me is that I have several legs up on you on
> virtually every subject,

You mean like the political discussion where you've been so beaten
into the ground that you are now claiming you didn't read certain
posts? Your legs are up alright. I think everyone can picture it.

More incomplete and self-confidence building statements. Can you EVER
be specific or are you always so very afraid of being made a fool of
over and over by me?

> and the only way you can get involved is to
> take a big initial step then start in with the cloud machine. It
> ALWAYS happens. And it's also why you look so ignorant and lost.

I'm not suprised that you think clouds are made by machines. It

goes right up your intellectual alley. However, if you ever want to
get back to facts again, just let me know. By the way, have you
called that doctor yet?

Now take it easy and don't forget that blood pressure medicine in the
morning. I can see you're feathers are getting more and more ruffled
as you just can't seem to find a handle here. Cloud-making machines
as an issue?

> To you it depicts hate because I'm that far a more intelligent

and sensible mind to you, and that rattles you no end. I call it

> superiority, and you translate that into the hate you have for

me. And I love it!!

More monkey boy bravado. It comes out everytime you are lost for
words. I don't need to respond to it because it means nothing to me
and everyone sees it for exactly what it is. FEAR and HATE. Go get
help and you can thank me when your done.

And I continue to love your discomfort with everything I ridicule you
with. Better double that dose tomorrow.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

[Dan_Cox]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "pesach kremen"
<royalflush2222@h...> wrote:

I don't know why this thread drags on and on, and on, and on.

There is simply no way, and it can be mathematically proven to turn a
negative expectation game in to a positive expectation game byany
betting method or play method whatsoever. Moving up in denomination
until you hit your 4 of a kind may work most of the time, but in the
end, you final outcome will be close to the expected value per hand
times hte number of hands played. Of course if you hav ebeen
unusually lucky along the way, you may have won so much $$$$ that you
will never have enough play time remaining to lose it back, but any
system that fails to recognize the math of the game is doomed to
failure.

I think you get it. My very successful system has nothing to do with
math theories, probabilities, or nonsensical expectations. It all has
to do with plain old common sense, goals, bankroll, determination and
discipline....traits always missing from so-called 'advantage
players' who by their own admission play far more hours than they
should have after hitting a jackpot. Either way, since it is a proven
winner in the casinos, it makes no sense for losers to continue to
play long-term strategy because it does not work.

As to problem gambling, the figure might be 3% or so, but their is

an honest distortion here. Many will not reach the level of problem
gambling and will stop short of not paying their bills, but there are
many who gamble to the point wher eit does effect their lifestyle.
For example, due gambling losses they may not buy the steaks they
were planning to buy at the grocery but may

buy fish instead (might be healthier in this instance, lol) or they

may cancel the decision to buy the new table for their kitchen, etc.

So many video poker players deny they have a problem, and we should
all know that's true. People like Dick will never admit to it even as
he spends the rest of his natural life inside a casino chasing a win
dream that will never come.

I do think that Rob Singer's idea of having loss limits is wprthy

of consideration though, not fromt he point of making a profit as
with his system it is mathematically impossible to do so, unless only
positive expectation games are played (or less than such with comps
putting you in positive territory), and with proper play of course,
but it does keep one form losing it all NOW. But the idea of hgoing
up, and up and up to win is very dangerour, even if the amount is
limited. How many 10K loss days can even Rob Singer absorb? The
strategies advanced by Dan Paymar, Bob Dancer, the late Lenny Frome,
Jean Scott, Stanford Wong, ect played at levels one is comforteable
with have been proven to be profiteable in the long run and do

work. They are based on sound mathematical principles.

It's the same old song and dance: Play positive machines and you can
win; play negatives ones and you will lose. That's the premise I
started with when I developed my winning strategies, and why i've put
together 5 strategies that will consistently make me money almost
whenever I play them. Dicky can't recognize the big wins on
denominations that are not often played, but for some reason he has
no problem recognizing the big losses that may come along. That's
pure blindness at work without using the head.

You say expert strategy DOES work. On paper and throughout infinity,
yes. But not in the casino and not for one moment is any casino
manager afraid of any one player anywhere. If so you'd be reading all
about it from other people besides the horn-tooters like your full-of-
herself Queen, Stanford "has-been" Wong, and others. And where's the
proof you mention other than on some obscure piece of math paper?

>From: "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
>Reply-To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
>To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [FREEvpFREE] Re: Will monkey boy FINALLY tell the TRUTH
>Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 15:57:25 -0000
>
>
> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
>wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm believing you recently won something or else you

wouldn't

>be
> > so pumped up when normally you are not. Not unlike every other
>addict
> > > on the planet either. You're in a fine "winning" group. Yes

you

> > > are.....
> > >
> > > I see you still don't understand addiction. Do I need to

spell it

> > out
> > > for you again. The best estimates put gambling addiction at no
>more
> > > than 3%. I can repeat this for you if you'd like. 3%. It is

quite

> > > interesting that most experts state that avoidance is the only
>way
> > to lick this addiction. In addition, you state you were once
>addicted
> > > and yet you still gamble. Puts it all in perspective ...
> >
> > I've recently seen on the Internet where that figure you toss
>around
> > is closer to 29%.
>
>Was that something you posted? Probably. If you don't back up your
>ridiculous assertions with some evidence then spare us.
>
> > But I don't care about it anyway. 3% or 29%--You're
> > in there and you know it.
>
>More projected self-image ... It's so obvious.
>
> > Maybe some day, if you ever choose a method
> > of play that's successful,
>
>I did, it's called advantage play. I've won ever since I analyzed

the

>approach and found it stands on technical merits. No need for

anyone

>to claim good or bad results. The system not only works, but is the
>ONLY approach that will work. All other systems are dependent on

LUCK

···

>--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
>and nothing else.
>
>
>
>

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > > Actually, it shows a good understand of your worthless
> strategies. What your repsonse demonstrates is poor reading
comprehension.
> >
> > What you say is akin to making believe you know something when
you don't. You're very good at that and it would be worth something
in the low-life circles of you and your fellow 'advantage' video
poker players, but it kind of doesn't make it with someone like me--
who uncovers and exposes your weakest inner fears time after time.
>
> Translation ... I was exactly right. You can always tell when the
> monkey boy attitude appears. Robs' ego won't let him say, "yeah,
> you're right", so he puffs up his monkey boy chest and spews

trash.

>
A spin on what I just said about you. Have you no ability to
adequately respond to anything any longer?

LMAO. Respond to what? Your repetitious, idiotic monkey boy trash
talk? Sorry chump, I will respond only to factual well thought out
responses. Something you know ABSOLUTELY nothing about. Let me know
when you get a brain transplant and we can have a reasonable
conversation.

Another bad day at the
machines while others up there were up in the mountains enjoying

life

with their families??

Up in the mountains? To think, just a couple of months ago the very
same man was denigrating anything but the wonderful life in
Scottsdale. Now that changes and it's the wonderful life in the
mountains. Even your lies make no sense.

PS. I spend pretty much every day with my family. It's interesting
that you have to make a point of mentioning this. I suspect it's
because your family really doesn't want you to spend time with them
so they avoid you whenever possible.

I didn't use a winning progression in my strategies, then I'd
> > likely
> > > be
> > > > a $5 player for lack of understanding on how to truly win.
> > >
> > > Thank you for VERIFYING my point. Your play at the highest
denoms
> > is still short term and the ONLY reason you are ahead. It

should

be
> a
> > > red flag to anyone considering your system that you don't

even

> > > understand this obvious point.
> >
> > Anything I say would verify your negative mind. Every bit of my
> play is short-term.
>
> 13 or even 7 years of play is NOT short term. But, 1-5% of 7

years

IS short term.

More anal statistics that make zero sense? What a fool you continue
to show the word you are.

I realize they don't make any sense to you. You've already proven
beyond any shadow of a doubt that you have no understanding of the
simplest technical topics. All one has to do is look at your idiotic
progressive system that has been proven worthless time and time again.

>
> > Every session is an average of 5 hours or less, and I
> > may play maybe once every two weeks. Short term is the ONLY way
to play. You ought to know that by now and I suspect you do.
>
> You session times and play amount is meaningless unless addition

in

> Robs' world works differently than the rest of the universe.

Like I said, you know it's true, but this time YOUR geek ego won't
allow you to capitulate.

Try this Robbie, 1+1=2. Not 3 or 4 or whatever you normally come up
with. Repeat as necessary. Now, if you keep trying really hard maybe
I can promote you from wannabee geek.

>
> > > > I guess it can be said that what is a flop-of-a-life to one
can be a very good life for another. Now I understand.
> > >
> > Let's leave that in there for a higher irritation factor.
> >
> > > > I've written about nearly every aspect of my life and

family

> that
> > I can in my articles and books for everyone to clearly read and
see,
> > >
> > > With your tendency to lie and lie I doubt you'll get anyone

to

> > > believe what you write is truthful.
> >
> > How many times have I mentioned that my publisher came with me

to

> my banks and verified withdrawals and mostly larger deposits as
often as I said I played. And he also went with me on several

winning

> > sessions. You only say I lie because you want it to be that I

do.

> You can't live with the fact that I've defeated the vp machines

in

a way that's off the scale of your stupid theories.
>
> I'm sure the same story could be made by a lottery winner. Means
> absolutely nothing. Of course, you know that. You keep up this
fraud
> because you think it makes you look important. It doesn't, monkey
> boy. Oh, did you forget that your wonderful publisher has been
shown to publish copyrighted material without permission? A great
reference if I ever saw one ... Birds of a feather?

You keep inserting the dumb theory of lottery winners because you
can't answer the point sensibly.

Other than the point on your head you have yet to make a point. Let
me know when you make your first attempt. Lottery winners are short
term lucky folk, just like you. Once you understand this SIMPLE fact
you can move on to the tougher topics of addition and subtraction.

>
>> > > No one can verify what goes on within someones' home by

making

a simple visit. What an idiotic statement. Go get some help.
> >
> > Oh. We went from the one here to the one in Hawaii--all on my
> nickel. What he saw when in my home was a happy, healthy,

energetic

family. Quite a different picture than you're used to, hey?
>
> More BS from the BS master. Let's hear it in your publisher

words.

> Otherwise, it means absolutely nothing coming from a continual

liar

> and fraud.

You believe nothing that you don't want to even if it's notarized

and

in front of you with the Pope blessing it. Such a sour life you are
cursed with.

No proof? I guess that pretty much means it was all a lie.

PS. You've lied so many times already, nobody would ever believe a
word you say.

>
> > It also doesn't work for every other advantage player who does
not have extreme and consistent good luck.
>
> Another unproven assertion. If your going to bellow out profuse

BS

> please do it somewhere else. Otherwise show proof.

After you show proof who those theoretical 'hundreds of winning
advantage players' are. Bet you can't!

I don't need to. I have MATHEMATICAL proof (which I've provided you
many times in the past). If you want to deny the math works, it's up
to you to prove it. Bet you can't! Oh, just in case your brain has
another fart and you think personal results are proof, they aren't
proof of squat.

>
> > > > And I also understand your denial of the
> > > > compulsion that controls your life.
> > >
> > > I explained addiction to you in detail and you had nothing to
> > counter my descriptions but more chest beating.
> >
> > You conveniently 'explained it away' when it came to you.

That's

> > spelled a clear D-E-N-I-A-L.
>
> You ask me to explain addiction and when I do, you call it denial.

That's because you refuse to answer my question without being
nebulous.

I've answered many of your questions truthfully and you ALWAYS turn
right around and deny them. No reason for me to continue.

I asked you to explain YOUR addiction, and you cloud it up
with whatever comes along (albeit slowly) in that aging mind of

yours.

Why should I ever answer any of your idiotic questions about
addiction. You're a mindless idiot who thinks anyone who plays VP
using advantage play is automatically addicted. You do this because
of your projected self-image. Your own addiction causes you to see it
in everyone else. Well, monkey boy, I'm not addicted. Never have been
and never will be. It's simply not in my makeup. Get used to it.

By the way, I don't smoke, don't drink and don't do drugs. Like I
said, addiction is not in my makeup (except maybe for golfing).

> Could it ever be more obvious to even the most casual viewwer

that

> you dred actually discussing addiction. It would take away one of
> your childish name calling avenues.

More denial in the form of an attack.

Just the facts. Look in the mirror and then go get some professional
help.

If a book on you were in front
of me I couldn't read you any better than I am now.

LMAO. Every time you've made an attempt to "read me" you've been 100%
wrong. On the other hand, you are as obvious as it gets. You can't
get around projecting your own self-image. Why do think I'm always
right in my descriptions of you?

>
> > Your problem with me is that I have several legs up on you on
> > virtually every subject,
>
> You mean like the political discussion where you've been so

beaten

> into the ground that you are now claiming you didn't read certain
> posts? Your legs are up alright. I think everyone can picture it.

More incomplete and self-confidence building statements. Can you

EVER

be specific or are you always so very afraid of being made a fool

of

over and over by me?

I was very specific. Too bad you don't like the image it portrays.

>
> > and the only way you can get involved is to
> > take a big initial step then start in with the cloud machine.

It

> > ALWAYS happens. And it's also why you look so ignorant and lost.
>
> I'm not suprised that you think clouds are made by machines. It
goes right up your intellectual alley. However, if you ever want to
get back to facts again, just let me know. By the way, have you
called that doctor yet?

Now take it easy and don't forget that blood pressure medicine in

the

morning.

110/68, and you said I never provide you any facts ...

>
> > To you it depicts hate because I'm that far a more intelligent
and sensible mind to you, and that rattles you no end. I call it
> > superiority, and you translate that into the hate you have for
me. And I love it!!
>
> More monkey boy bravado. It comes out everytime you are lost for
> words. I don't need to respond to it because it means nothing to

me

> and everyone sees it for exactly what it is. FEAR and HATE. Go

get

> help and you can thank me when your done.

And I continue to love your discomfort with everything I ridicule

you

with. Better double that dose tomorrow.

I'm very comfortable tonight (actually pretty much every night). I
finished almost dead last in a silly slot tournament this weekend.
Fortunately, the gambling gods saw it fit to provide quad aces twice
while playing FPDB between rounds (not to mention the four 3's and
4's). At the banquet afterwards I met some interesting people and had
a really good time. As you can see, you are once more 100% wrong in
everything you say about me or just about anything. How does it feel
to ALWAYS be wrong?

I'll give you a little hint monkey boy. For ridicule to bother
someone, they must respect the person dishing it out. You're so far
from making the list of people I respect it's kind of funny to even
contemplate it. You are a liar, a fraud, a racist, a warmonger and a
REALLY stupid person. Sorry chump, but I see all your ridicule as
projected at yourself (and rightly so might I add). That is why I've
asked you to get help.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

[tghysel]

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:

You guys keep going back and forth like this and people are going to
get the impression you don't like each other...

> >
> > > > Actually, it shows a good understand of your worthless
> > strategies. What your repsonse demonstrates is poor reading
> comprehension.
> > >
> > > What you say is akin to making believe you know something

when

> you don't. You're very good at that and it would be worth

something

> in the low-life circles of you and your fellow 'advantage' video
> poker players, but it kind of doesn't make it with someone like

me--

> who uncovers and exposes your weakest inner fears time after time.
> >
> > Translation ... I was exactly right. You can always tell when

the

> > monkey boy attitude appears. Robs' ego won't let him

say, "yeah,

> > you're right", so he puffs up his monkey boy chest and spews
trash.
> >
> A spin on what I just said about you. Have you no ability to
> adequately respond to anything any longer?

LMAO. Respond to what? Your repetitious, idiotic monkey boy trash
talk? Sorry chump, I will respond only to factual well thought out
responses. Something you know ABSOLUTELY nothing about. Let me know
when you get a brain transplant and we can have a reasonable
conversation.

> Another bad day at the
> machines while others up there were up in the mountains enjoying
life
> with their families??

Up in the mountains? To think, just a couple of months ago the very
same man was denigrating anything but the wonderful life in
Scottsdale. Now that changes and it's the wonderful life in the
mountains. Even your lies make no sense.

PS. I spend pretty much every day with my family. It's interesting
that you have to make a point of mentioning this. I suspect it's
because your family really doesn't want you to spend time with them
so they avoid you whenever possible.

>
> I didn't use a winning progression in my strategies, then I'd
> > > likely
> > > > be
> > > > > a $5 player for lack of understanding on how to truly win.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for VERIFYING my point. Your play at the highest
> denoms
> > > is still short term and the ONLY reason you are ahead. It
should
> be
> > a
> > > > red flag to anyone considering your system that you don't
even
> > > > understand this obvious point.
> > >
> > > Anything I say would verify your negative mind. Every bit of

my

> > play is short-term.
> >
> > 13 or even 7 years of play is NOT short term. But, 1-5% of 7
years
> IS short term.
>
> More anal statistics that make zero sense? What a fool you

continue

> to show the word you are.

I realize they don't make any sense to you. You've already proven
beyond any shadow of a doubt that you have no understanding of the
simplest technical topics. All one has to do is look at your

idiotic

progressive system that has been proven worthless time and time

again.

> >
> > > Every session is an average of 5 hours or less, and I
> > > may play maybe once every two weeks. Short term is the ONLY

way

> to play. You ought to know that by now and I suspect you do.
> >
> > You session times and play amount is meaningless unless

addition

in
> > Robs' world works differently than the rest of the universe.
>
> Like I said, you know it's true, but this time YOUR geek ego

won't

> allow you to capitulate.

Try this Robbie, 1+1=2. Not 3 or 4 or whatever you normally come up
with. Repeat as necessary. Now, if you keep trying really hard

maybe

I can promote you from wannabee geek.

> >
> > > > > I guess it can be said that what is a flop-of-a-life to

one

> can be a very good life for another. Now I understand.
> > > >
> > > Let's leave that in there for a higher irritation factor.
> > >
> > > > > I've written about nearly every aspect of my life and
family
> > that
> > > I can in my articles and books for everyone to clearly read

and

> see,
> > > >
> > > > With your tendency to lie and lie I doubt you'll get anyone
to
> > > > believe what you write is truthful.
> > >
> > > How many times have I mentioned that my publisher came with

me

to
> > my banks and verified withdrawals and mostly larger deposits as
> often as I said I played. And he also went with me on several
winning
> > > sessions. You only say I lie because you want it to be that I
do.
> > You can't live with the fact that I've defeated the vp machines
in
> a way that's off the scale of your stupid theories.
> >
> > I'm sure the same story could be made by a lottery winner.

Means

> > absolutely nothing. Of course, you know that. You keep up this
> fraud
> > because you think it makes you look important. It doesn't,

monkey

> > boy. Oh, did you forget that your wonderful publisher has been
> shown to publish copyrighted material without permission? A great
> reference if I ever saw one ... Birds of a feather?
>
> You keep inserting the dumb theory of lottery winners because you
> can't answer the point sensibly.

Other than the point on your head you have yet to make a point. Let
me know when you make your first attempt. Lottery winners are short
term lucky folk, just like you. Once you understand this SIMPLE

fact

you can move on to the tougher topics of addition and subtraction.

> >
> >> > > No one can verify what goes on within someones' home by
making
> a simple visit. What an idiotic statement. Go get some help.
> > >
> > > Oh. We went from the one here to the one in Hawaii--all on my
> > nickel. What he saw when in my home was a happy, healthy,
energetic
> family. Quite a different picture than you're used to, hey?
> >
> > More BS from the BS master. Let's hear it in your publisher
words.
> > Otherwise, it means absolutely nothing coming from a continual
liar
> > and fraud.
>
> You believe nothing that you don't want to even if it's notarized
and
> in front of you with the Pope blessing it. Such a sour life you

are

> cursed with.

No proof? I guess that pretty much means it was all a lie.

PS. You've lied so many times already, nobody would ever believe a
word you say.

> >
> > > It also doesn't work for every other advantage player who

does

> not have extreme and consistent good luck.
> >
> > Another unproven assertion. If your going to bellow out profuse
BS
> > please do it somewhere else. Otherwise show proof.
>
> After you show proof who those theoretical 'hundreds of winning
> advantage players' are. Bet you can't!

I don't need to. I have MATHEMATICAL proof (which I've provided you
many times in the past). If you want to deny the math works, it's

up

to you to prove it. Bet you can't! Oh, just in case your brain has
another fart and you think personal results are proof, they aren't
proof of squat.

> >
> > > > > And I also understand your denial of the
> > > > > compulsion that controls your life.
> > > >
> > > > I explained addiction to you in detail and you had nothing

to

> > > counter my descriptions but more chest beating.
> > >
> > > You conveniently 'explained it away' when it came to you.
That's
> > > spelled a clear D-E-N-I-A-L.
> >
> > You ask me to explain addiction and when I do, you call it

denial.

>
> That's because you refuse to answer my question without being
> nebulous.

I've answered many of your questions truthfully and you ALWAYS turn
right around and deny them. No reason for me to continue.

> I asked you to explain YOUR addiction, and you cloud it up
> with whatever comes along (albeit slowly) in that aging mind of
yours.

Why should I ever answer any of your idiotic questions about
addiction. You're a mindless idiot who thinks anyone who plays VP
using advantage play is automatically addicted. You do this because
of your projected self-image. Your own addiction causes you to see

it

in everyone else. Well, monkey boy, I'm not addicted. Never have

been

and never will be. It's simply not in my makeup. Get used to it.

By the way, I don't smoke, don't drink and don't do drugs. Like I
said, addiction is not in my makeup (except maybe for golfing).

>
> > Could it ever be more obvious to even the most casual viewwer
that
> > you dred actually discussing addiction. It would take away one

of

> > your childish name calling avenues.
>
> More denial in the form of an attack.

Just the facts. Look in the mirror and then go get some

professional

help.

> If a book on you were in front
> of me I couldn't read you any better than I am now.

LMAO. Every time you've made an attempt to "read me" you've been

100%

wrong. On the other hand, you are as obvious as it gets. You can't
get around projecting your own self-image. Why do think I'm always
right in my descriptions of you?

> >
> > > Your problem with me is that I have several legs up on you on
> > > virtually every subject,
> >
> > You mean like the political discussion where you've been so
beaten
> > into the ground that you are now claiming you didn't read

certain

> > posts? Your legs are up alright. I think everyone can picture

it.

>
> More incomplete and self-confidence building statements. Can you
EVER
> be specific or are you always so very afraid of being made a fool
of
> over and over by me?

I was very specific. Too bad you don't like the image it portrays.

> >
> > > and the only way you can get involved is to
> > > take a big initial step then start in with the cloud machine.
It
> > > ALWAYS happens. And it's also why you look so ignorant and

lost.

> >
> > I'm not suprised that you think clouds are made by machines. It
> goes right up your intellectual alley. However, if you ever want

to

> get back to facts again, just let me know. By the way, have you
> called that doctor yet?
>
> Now take it easy and don't forget that blood pressure medicine in
the
> morning.

110/68, and you said I never provide you any facts ...

> >
> > > To you it depicts hate because I'm that far a more

intelligent

> and sensible mind to you, and that rattles you no end. I call it
> > > superiority, and you translate that into the hate you have

for

> me. And I love it!!
> >
> > More monkey boy bravado. It comes out everytime you are lost

for

> > words. I don't need to respond to it because it means nothing

to

me
> > and everyone sees it for exactly what it is. FEAR and HATE. Go
get
> > help and you can thank me when your done.
>
> And I continue to love your discomfort with everything I ridicule
you
> with. Better double that dose tomorrow.

I'm very comfortable tonight (actually pretty much every night). I
finished almost dead last in a silly slot tournament this weekend.
Fortunately, the gambling gods saw it fit to provide quad aces

twice

while playing FPDB between rounds (not to mention the four 3's and
4's). At the banquet afterwards I met some interesting people and

had

a really good time. As you can see, you are once more 100% wrong in
everything you say about me or just about anything. How does it

feel

to ALWAYS be wrong?

I'll give you a little hint monkey boy. For ridicule to bother
someone, they must respect the person dishing it out. You're so far
from making the list of people I respect it's kind of funny to even
contemplate it. You are a liar, a fraud, a racist, a warmonger and

a

REALLY stupid person. Sorry chump, but I see all your ridicule as
projected at yourself (and rightly so might I add). That is why

I've

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
asked you to get help.

[Dan_Cox]

> Another bad day at the
> machines while others up there were up in the mountains enjoying
life with their families??

Up in the mountains? To think, just a couple of months ago the very
same man was denigrating anything but the wonderful life in
Scottsdale. Now that changes and it's the wonderful life in the
mountains. Even your lies make no sense.

So how's the weather today? Outside the casinos, I mean. And
mountains in winter are mountains in winter. The clearly stated point
that either went whizzing over your head or right thru the geek-hole
in it pertains to the fact that while others know how to enjoy life
doing a variety of things, all you can do is sit at video poker
machines or dream of them when you're away from casinos. It's a
pathetic trait you have and have passed onto your innocent wife that
it warrants ridiculing you more and more....and to my delight!

PS. I spend pretty much every day with my family. It's interesting
that you have to make a point of mentioning this. I suspect it's
because your family really doesn't want you to spend time with them
so they avoid you whenever possible.

Your continuing denial and defensive postures say it all. A loser is
a loser is a loser. Bow to that fact and you'll be able to live with
yourself a bit longer.

  
> More anal statistics that make zero sense? What a fool you

continue to show the word you are.

I realize they don't make any sense to you. You've already proven
beyond any shadow of a doubt that you have no understanding of the
simplest technical topics. All one has to do is look at your

idiotic progressive system that has been proven worthless time and
time again.

> >
> > > Every session is an average of 5 hours or less, and I
> > > may play maybe once every two weeks. Short term is the ONLY

way to play. You ought to know that by now and I suspect you do.

> >
> > You session times and play amount is meaningless unless

addition

in
> > Robs' world works differently than the rest of the universe.
>
> Like I said, you know it's true, but this time YOUR geek ego

won't allow you to capitulate.

Try this Robbie, 1+1=2. Not 3 or 4 or whatever you normally come up
with. Repeat as necessary. Now, if you keep trying really hard

maybe I can promote you from wannabee geek.

You must be the only vp addict alive that adds 1+1 up whenever you
get caught misrepresenting the facts. You do that often. Any
particular problem other than the obvious?

> > I'm sure the same story could be made by a lottery winner.

Means

> > absolutely nothing. Of course, you know that. You keep up this
> fraud
> > because you think it makes you look important. It doesn't,

monkey

> > boy. Oh, did you forget that your wonderful publisher has been
> shown to publish copyrighted material without permission? A great
> reference if I ever saw one ... Birds of a feather?
>
> You keep inserting the dumb theory of lottery winners because you
> can't answer the point sensibly.

Other than the point on your head you have yet to make a point. Let
me know when you make your first attempt. Lottery winners are short
term lucky folk, just like you. Once you understand this SIMPLE

fact you can move on to the tougher topics of addition and
subtraction.

Here's a flash on your lottery winners. Almost every one of them is a
long-term unlucky loser--even the ones who win. The last ticket
holder who won powerball says she's been playing for years and years
and never won anything until then. So your theory's a little
stretched at this point. Even YOU can't make sense of it. Revenge of
the geek.

> > More BS from the BS master. Let's hear it in your publisher
words. Otherwise, it means absolutely nothing coming from a

continual liar and fraud.

>
> You believe nothing that you don't want to even if it's notarized
and in front of you with the Pope blessing it. Such a sour life you

are cursed with.

No proof? I guess that pretty much means it was all a lie.

You're always guessing. I'm certain that comes from your addiction to
playing video poker and guessing wrong continually.

> After you show proof who those theoretical 'hundreds of winning
> advantage players' are. Bet you can't!

I don't need to. I have MATHEMATICAL proof (which I've provided you
many times in the past). If you want to deny the math works, it's

up to you to prove it. Bet you can't! Oh, just in case your brain has

another fart and you think personal results are proof, they aren't
proof of squat.

Historical data is proof, and theory is on paper and means you dream
of being successful because the classroom tells you it can be done.
It can't, your sorry addict life is proof of that, and my enjoyable,
plentiful lifestyle is proof my methods work. Bet you can't deny that!

> > > > > And I also understand your denial of the
> > > > > compulsion that controls your life.
> > > >
> > > > I explained addiction to you in detail and you had nothing

to

> > > counter my descriptions but more chest beating.
> > >
> > > You conveniently 'explained it away' when it came to you.
That's spelled a clear D-E-N-I-A-L.
> >
> > You ask me to explain addiction and when I do, you call it

denial.

>
> That's because you refuse to answer my question without being
> nebulous.

I've answered many of your questions truthfully and you ALWAYS turn
right around and deny them. No reason for me to continue.

More cloudy, incomplete and watered-down answers so as not to have to
be pinpoint accurate. Kind of goes against your geek-creed.

> I asked you to explain YOUR addiction, and you cloud it up
> with whatever comes along (albeit slowly) in that aging mind of
yours.

Why should I ever answer any of your idiotic questions about
addiction. You're a mindless idiot who thinks anyone who plays VP
using advantage play is automatically addicted. You do this because
of your projected self-image. Your own addiction causes you to see

it in everyone else. Well, monkey boy, I'm not addicted. Never have
been and never will be. It's simply not in my makeup. Get used to it.

More denial. And have I said how dumb and telling your defensive
postures make you look? Of course, not to mention wordy. That's what
causes you the rise in blood pressure. What pills you taking for that
disease anyway??

By the way, I don't smoke, don't drink and don't do drugs. Like I
said, addiction is not in my makeup (except maybe for golfing).

Certainly. But you eat too much. Explain that one. Then correlate it
all to your habitual gambling problem.

> > Could it ever be more obvious to even the most casual viewwer
that you dred actually discussing addiction. It would take away one

of your childish name calling avenues.

>
> More denial in the form of an attack.

Just the facts. Look in the mirror and then go get some

professional help.

The fact I just saw said Dicky would never admit he had a gambling
problem because that would mean the most important thing in his life
was a baddy. So pathetic.

> If a book on you were in front
> of me I couldn't read you any better than I am now.

LMAO. Every time you've made an attempt to "read me" you've been

100% wrong. On the other hand, you are as obvious as it gets. You
can't get around projecting your own self-image. Why do think I'm
always right in my descriptions of you?

More denial when I hit the nail on the head. And more Pee Wee because
you couldn't create your own wording here again. That's OK though.
I'm used to setting the pace.

> > > Your problem with me is that I have several legs up on you on
> > > virtually every subject,
> >
> > You mean like the political discussion where you've been so
beaten
> > into the ground that you are now claiming you didn't read

certain

> > posts? Your legs are up alright. I think everyone can picture

it.

>
> More incomplete and self-confidence building statements. Can you
EVER be specific or are you always so very afraid of being made a

fool of over and over by me?

I was very specific. Too bad you don't like the image it portrays.

The one of you being made an old fool of over and over? I'll never
tire of that!

> get back to facts again, just let me know. By the way, have you
> called that doctor yet?
>
> Now take it easy and don't forget that blood pressure medicine in
the morning.

110/68, and you said I never provide you any facts ...

Prove it. Isn't that what geeks require of others? We'll check it
when you get here with the $700k you claim you have but you don't.
HAHAHA!

  
> > > To you it depicts hate because I'm that far a more

intelligent

> and sensible mind to you, and that rattles you no end. I call it
> > > superiority, and you translate that into the hate you have

for

> me. And I love it!!
> >
> > More monkey boy bravado. It comes out everytime you are lost

for

> > words. I don't need to respond to it because it means nothing

to

me
> > and everyone sees it for exactly what it is. FEAR and HATE. Go
get
> > help and you can thank me when your done.
>
> And I continue to love your discomfort with everything I ridicule
you with. Better double that dose tomorrow.

I'm very comfortable tonight (actually pretty much every night). I
finished almost dead last in a silly slot tournament this weekend.
Fortunately, the gambling gods saw it fit to provide quad aces

twice while playing FPDB between rounds (not to mention the four 3's
and 4's). At the banquet afterwards I met some interesting people and
had a really good time. As you can see, you are once more 100% wrong
in everything you say about me or just about anything. How does it
feel to ALWAYS be wrong?

More gambling?? Hohoho! And isn't it just like a losing addict to
come out of his hole to blab whenever some winning hands are hit? I
watched football today with my son and daughter as the Patriots won
again on their way to another Super Bowl title and my wife went
Christmas shopping. No casinos, no machines, no low-life gamblers, no
crappy food at some crowded banquet of playing-fools, and definitely
no stupid slot tournaments. If that's the kind of day that turns you
on, you have waaaaaay more of a problem than I thought.

I'll give you a little hint monkey boy. For ridicule to bother
someone, they must respect the person dishing it out. You're so far
from making the list of people I respect it's kind of funny to even
contemplate it. You are a liar, a fraud, a racist, a warmonger and

a REALLY stupid person. Sorry chump, but I see all your ridicule as

projected at yourself (and rightly so might I add). That is why

I've asked you to get help.

More attacks? Gee, if my ridicule of your addiction gets you a
wedgie, what in the world will my last paragraph do to you?? From
what you explained, a person must respect themself before being able
to respect others. Your penchant for casinos and that kind of sick
life indicates you haven't learned how to respect yourself let alone
others. I'll not get your respect until the day you either learn a
hard lesson that you should have been taught long ago on gambling and
casino compulsions, or on your deathbed as you ask my forgiveness for
your misled opinions about me. And at your 'advanced' age, you might
want to think that thru a bit ASAP.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

[Dan_Cox]

to get the impression you don't like each other...

I like to ridicule Dicky. I like to make him look like the fool his
family knows he is for allowing his life to become totally controlled
by casino visits, I like to make fun of him for weaseling out of bets
with a mealy-mouthing of everything that should make sense, I like
exposing him for never showing proof or facts of anything when he
makes believe he lives his life based on a strict regimen of anal-
izing even the smallest details, and I like to remind him that he
never again will be able to take a normal vacation without including
his sick habit in the plans somewhere along the way. Yes, I like
raising Dicky's blood pressure with a plethora of undeniable truths.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "tghysel" <tghysel@y...> wrote:

You guys keep going back and forth like this and people are going

[rgmustain]

You guys keep going back and forth like this and people are going

to

get the impression you don't like each other...

It's really just a game for me. I actually tried to get Rob to
understand the facts last summer and then I realized it was all a
scam for him. His entire life and perceived fame revolve around the
scam. He's never going to change his tune in spite of absolute proof
to the contrary.

Since then my posts are for entertainment only. My posts are geared
to get specific responses out of Rob. It amazing how often I can get
exactly the response I'm going for. If you go back a month you can
see how I changed the subject of our threads from political back to
VP. It was really quite easy.

You know what's really wierd. Even after posting this admission, Rob
will continue to respond to my posts and I will be able to do the
exact same thing for as long as I want.

Dick

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "tghysel" <tghysel@y...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> > Another bad day at the
> > machines while others up there were up in the mountains

enjoying

> life with their families??
>
> Up in the mountains? To think, just a couple of months ago the

very

> same man was denigrating anything but the wonderful life in
> Scottsdale. Now that changes and it's the wonderful life in the
> mountains. Even your lies make no sense.

So how's the weather today? Outside the casinos, I mean.

Sunny and 70 yesterday. I little warmer in the casino.

And
mountains in winter are mountains in winter. The clearly stated

point

that either went whizzing over your head or right thru the geek-

hole

in it pertains to the fact that while others know how to enjoy life
doing a variety of things, all you can do is sit at video poker
machines or dream of them when you're away from casinos. It's a
pathetic trait you have and have passed onto your innocent wife

that

it warrants ridiculing you more and more....and to my delight!

It so much fun to hear you rag on about me as always when you know
nothing about me. It's a perfect insight into your mind. If only you
knew ...

>
> PS. I spend pretty much every day with my family. It's

interesting

> that you have to make a point of mentioning this. I suspect it's
> because your family really doesn't want you to spend time with

them

> so they avoid you whenever possible.

Your continuing denial and defensive postures say it all. A loser

is

a loser is a loser. Bow to that fact and you'll be able to live

with

yourself a bit longer.

I see that projected self image rising again. Go get help. If not for
yourself, do it for your family. They will thank you in the end.

>
> > More anal statistics that make zero sense? What a fool you
continue to show the word you are.
>
> I realize they don't make any sense to you. You've already proven
> beyond any shadow of a doubt that you have no understanding of

the

> simplest technical topics. All one has to do is look at your
idiotic progressive system that has been proven worthless time and
time again.
>
> > >
> > > > Every session is an average of 5 hours or less, and I
> > > > may play maybe once every two weeks. Short term is the ONLY
way to play. You ought to know that by now and I suspect you do.
> > >
> > > You session times and play amount is meaningless unless
addition
> in
> > > Robs' world works differently than the rest of the universe.
> >
> > Like I said, you know it's true, but this time YOUR geek ego
won't allow you to capitulate.
>
> Try this Robbie, 1+1=2. Not 3 or 4 or whatever you normally come

up

> with. Repeat as necessary. Now, if you keep trying really hard
maybe I can promote you from wannabee geek.

You must be the only vp addict alive that adds 1+1 up whenever you
get caught misrepresenting the facts. You do that often. Any
particular problem other than the obvious?

1+1=2, Robbie, not 1+1=blank. Now, back to drawing board until you
get it right.

>
> > > I'm sure the same story could be made by a lottery winner.
Means
> > > absolutely nothing. Of course, you know that. You keep up

this

> > fraud
> > > because you think it makes you look important. It doesn't,
monkey
> > > boy. Oh, did you forget that your wonderful publisher has

been

> > shown to publish copyrighted material without permission? A

great

> > reference if I ever saw one ... Birds of a feather?
> >
> > You keep inserting the dumb theory of lottery winners because

you

> > can't answer the point sensibly.
>
> Other than the point on your head you have yet to make a point.

Let

> me know when you make your first attempt. Lottery winners are

short

> term lucky folk, just like you. Once you understand this SIMPLE
fact you can move on to the tougher topics of addition and
subtraction.

Here's a flash on your lottery winners. Almost every one of them is

a

long-term unlucky loser--even the ones who win. The last ticket
holder who won powerball says she's been playing for years and

years

and never won anything until then. So your theory's a little
stretched at this point. Even YOU can't make sense of it. Revenge

of

the geek.

So, your position is that winning the lottery is NOT lucky. ROTFLMAO.
Need I say more ...

>
> > > More BS from the BS master. Let's hear it in your publisher
> words. Otherwise, it means absolutely nothing coming from a
continual liar and fraud.
> >
> > You believe nothing that you don't want to even if it's

notarized

> and in front of you with the Pope blessing it. Such a sour life

you

are cursed with.
>
> No proof? I guess that pretty much means it was all a lie.

You're always guessing. I'm certain that comes from your addiction

to

playing video poker and guessing wrong continually.

Let hear the words directly from your publisher or give it up monkey
boy. Your continual lies are boring and tiresome. Or, wait, maybe
your mama is your publisher ...

>
> > After you show proof who those theoretical 'hundreds of winning
> > advantage players' are. Bet you can't!
>
> I don't need to. I have MATHEMATICAL proof (which I've provided

you

> many times in the past). If you want to deny the math works, it's
up to you to prove it. Bet you can't! Oh, just in case your brain

has

> another fart and you think personal results are proof, they

aren't

> proof of squat.

Historical data is proof,

LMAO. If that were the case then a lottery winner would be proof that
everyone will win a lottery. Have I said that before??? Can't you
come up with reasonable argument to support your position without
reverting to this idiotic, worn out BS.

and theory is on paper

Like I've pointed out to you many times ... The same theory is behind
EVERY electronic invention you can think of. Try again, monkey boy.

and means you dream
of being successful because the classroom tells you it can be done.

I AM succesful as are hundreds of other advantage players. I met
another one last night. We've moved beyond dreaming about our HS
proms and make real world decisions that bring in money. I realize
this gets to you since you failed miserably and have only your HS
memories to get you through the day.

It can't, your sorry addict life is proof of that, and my

enjoyable,

plentiful lifestyle is proof my methods work. Bet you can't deny

that!

More BS from the BS master. Go see that shrink. I know he can help.

>
> > > > > > And I also understand your denial of the
> > > > > > compulsion that controls your life.
> > > > >
> > > > > I explained addiction to you in detail and you had

nothing

to
> > > > counter my descriptions but more chest beating.
> > > >
> > > > You conveniently 'explained it away' when it came to you.
> That's spelled a clear D-E-N-I-A-L.
> > >
> > > You ask me to explain addiction and when I do, you call it
denial.
> >
> > That's because you refuse to answer my question without being
> > nebulous.
>
> I've answered many of your questions truthfully and you ALWAYS

turn

> right around and deny them. No reason for me to continue.

More cloudy, incomplete and watered-down answers so as not to have

to

be pinpoint accurate. Kind of goes against your geek-creed.

Come on, Robbie, make up your mind. What about all the times you've
called me a geek? Am I one or not? Can't you take a position and
stick with it? ... A true sign of a scammer.

>
> > I asked you to explain YOUR addiction, and you cloud it up
> > with whatever comes along (albeit slowly) in that aging mind of
> yours.
>
> Why should I ever answer any of your idiotic questions about
> addiction. You're a mindless idiot who thinks anyone who plays VP
> using advantage play is automatically addicted. You do this

because

> of your projected self-image. Your own addiction causes you to

see

it in everyone else. Well, monkey boy, I'm not addicted. Never have
been and never will be. It's simply not in my makeup. Get used to

it.

More denial.

It's too bad that facts bother you. Get used to it.

And have I said how dumb and telling your defensive
postures make you look? Of course, not to mention wordy. That's

what

causes you the rise in blood pressure. What pills you taking for

that

disease anyway??

Talk about wordy? Get over it, monkey boy.

>
> By the way, I don't smoke, don't drink and don't do drugs. Like I
> said, addiction is not in my makeup (except maybe for golfing).

Certainly. But you eat too much. Explain that one.

Hmmmmmm. I'll admit I'm addicted to eating. I do it every day. Maybe
I should see a eating cessation specialist. This is too good. LMAO.

Then correlate it
all to your habitual gambling problem.

Now that's an interesting correlation to make. I eat, I gamble, I
eat, I gamble, I eat, I gamble, ... Maybe I should give up gambling
and lose some weight. Or, better, yet, eat more and win more money
gambling. This is so much fun ...

>
> > > Could it ever be more obvious to even the most casual viewwer
> that you dred actually discussing addiction. It would take away

one

of your childish name calling avenues.
> >
> > More denial in the form of an attack.
>
> Just the facts. Look in the mirror and then go get some
professional help.

The fact I just saw said Dicky would never admit he had a gambling
problem because that would mean the most important thing in his

life

was a baddy. So pathetic.

Give it up, monkey boy. You've lost on the addiction topic (and made
yourself look like a complete idiot). However, I haven't had this
good of laugh in a couple of days (since one of your previous screw-
ups).

>
> > If a book on you were in front
> > of me I couldn't read you any better than I am now.
>
> LMAO. Every time you've made an attempt to "read me" you've been
100% wrong. On the other hand, you are as obvious as it gets. You
can't get around projecting your own self-image. Why do think I'm
always right in my descriptions of you?

More denial when I hit the nail on the head. And more Pee Wee

because

you couldn't create your own wording here again. That's OK though.
I'm used to setting the pace.

OK, turtle boy, keep up this amazing pace, I'm almost awake. Did I
mention that tendency of yours to project your own self image? WELL,
HERE IT IS AGAIN.

>
> > > > Your problem with me is that I have several legs up on you

on

> > > > virtually every subject,
> > >
> > > You mean like the political discussion where you've been so
> beaten
> > > into the ground that you are now claiming you didn't read
certain
> > > posts? Your legs are up alright. I think everyone can picture
it.
> >
> > More incomplete and self-confidence building statements. Can

you

> EVER be specific or are you always so very afraid of being made a
fool of over and over by me?
>
> I was very specific. Too bad you don't like the image it portrays.

The one of you being made an old fool of over and over? I'll never
tire of that!

I assume you're referring to the "image" where you're losing the
political discussion to John. That's right, little mamas' boy, you've
been outclassed there just like you have been here. Now, let's hear
another monkey boy claim that everyone else knows is a feeble losers'
attempt to gain respect. It will never work and deep down inside you
know it. Go get help.

>
> > > > To you it depicts hate because I'm that far a more
intelligent
> > and sensible mind to you, and that rattles you no end. I call

it

> > > > superiority, and you translate that into the hate you have
for
> > me. And I love it!!
> > >
> > > More monkey boy bravado. It comes out everytime you are lost
for
> > > words. I don't need to respond to it because it means nothing
to
> me
> > > and everyone sees it for exactly what it is. FEAR and HATE.

Go

> get
> > > help and you can thank me when your done.
> >
> > And I continue to love your discomfort with everything I

ridicule

> you with. Better double that dose tomorrow.
>
> I'm very comfortable tonight (actually pretty much every night).

I

> finished almost dead last in a silly slot tournament this

weekend.

> Fortunately, the gambling gods saw it fit to provide quad aces
twice while playing FPDB between rounds (not to mention the four

3's

and 4's). At the banquet afterwards I met some interesting people

and

had a really good time. As you can see, you are once more 100%

wrong

in everything you say about me or just about anything. How does it
feel to ALWAYS be wrong?

More gambling?? Hohoho! And isn't it just like a losing addict to
come out of his hole to blab whenever some winning hands are hit? I
watched football today with my son and daughter as the Patriots won
again on their way to another Super Bowl title and my wife went
Christmas shopping. No casinos, no machines, no low-life gamblers,

no

crappy food at some crowded banquet of playing-fools, and

definitely

no stupid slot tournaments. If that's the kind of day that turns

you

on, you have waaaaaay more of a problem than I thought.

Let's see, on one hand Robbie claims he wins big bucks gambling, on
the hand he claims it's stupid to EVER be in a casino winning money
and having a good time. I think just about everyone can see the
hypocrisy in this statement. Your rebuttals are getting more and more
lame every time.

>
> I'll give you a little hint monkey boy. For ridicule to bother
> someone, they must respect the person dishing it out. You're so

far

> from making the list of people I respect it's kind of funny to

even

> contemplate it. You are a liar, a fraud, a racist, a warmonger

and

a REALLY stupid person. Sorry chump, but I see all your ridicule as
> projected at yourself (and rightly so might I add). That is why
I've asked you to get help.

More attacks?

Just the facts. Like I said before, I'm trying to help you here.

Gee, if my ridicule of your addiction gets you a
wedgie, what in the world will my last paragraph do to you?? From
what you explained, a person must respect themself before being

able

to respect others.

Talk about self-image ... This is EXACTLY why you behave the way you
do. Your hate for yourself spews out all the time. That is the reason
you need to get help. You need to accept that you've been a loser all
your life and forgive yourself. Only then can you move on.

Your penchant for casinos and that kind of sick
life indicates you haven't learned how to respect yourself let

alone

others.

This is so obviously wrong and easily rebutted. I've only gambled
more than a couple times a year for the last 6 years. So how did it
affect my "respect" for my first 50 years? Of course, it couldn't
have, which makes your idiotic attempt to make sense look as silly as
all your previous attempts. Give it up. You know nothing about me,
other than I'm way smarter than you, and it bothers you to no end.

I'll not get your respect

Finally, an accuracy ... I bet it doesn't continue.

until the day you either learn a
hard lesson that you should have been taught long ago on gambling

and

casino compulsions, or on your deathbed as you ask my forgiveness

for

your misled opinions about me. And at your 'advanced' age, you

might

want to think that thru a bit ASAP.

I was right. ROTFLMAO. This is beyond funny. This is beyond
hilarious. And to think, Robbie probably had a straight face when he
wrote it. Please, someone, make him stop, my sides are killing me.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

[three2theroyal]

I have started reading more of the other posts on this site. Damn,
Robbie Bob, you can't win any!! Another battle of wits with an
unarmed man. Hahahahaha.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:

>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> >
> > > Another bad day at the
> > > machines while others up there were up in the mountains
enjoying
> > life with their families??
> >
> > Up in the mountains? To think, just a couple of months ago the
very
> > same man was denigrating anything but the wonderful life in
> > Scottsdale. Now that changes and it's the wonderful life in

the

> > mountains. Even your lies make no sense.
>
> So how's the weather today? Outside the casinos, I mean.

Sunny and 70 yesterday. I little warmer in the casino.

> And
> mountains in winter are mountains in winter. The clearly stated
point
> that either went whizzing over your head or right thru the geek-
hole
> in it pertains to the fact that while others know how to enjoy

life

> doing a variety of things, all you can do is sit at video poker
> machines or dream of them when you're away from casinos. It's a
> pathetic trait you have and have passed onto your innocent wife
that
> it warrants ridiculing you more and more....and to my delight!

It so much fun to hear you rag on about me as always when you know
nothing about me. It's a perfect insight into your mind. If only

you

knew ...

> >
> > PS. I spend pretty much every day with my family. It's
interesting
> > that you have to make a point of mentioning this. I suspect

it's

> > because your family really doesn't want you to spend time with
them
> > so they avoid you whenever possible.
>
> Your continuing denial and defensive postures say it all. A

loser

is
> a loser is a loser. Bow to that fact and you'll be able to live
with
> yourself a bit longer.

I see that projected self image rising again. Go get help. If not

for

yourself, do it for your family. They will thank you in the end.

> >
> > > More anal statistics that make zero sense? What a fool you
> continue to show the word you are.
> >
> > I realize they don't make any sense to you. You've already

proven

> > beyond any shadow of a doubt that you have no understanding of
the
> > simplest technical topics. All one has to do is look at your
> idiotic progressive system that has been proven worthless time

and

> time again.
> >
> > > >
> > > > > Every session is an average of 5 hours or less, and I
> > > > > may play maybe once every two weeks. Short term is the

ONLY

> way to play. You ought to know that by now and I suspect you do.
> > > >
> > > > You session times and play amount is meaningless unless
> addition
> > in
> > > > Robs' world works differently than the rest of the

universe.

> > >
> > > Like I said, you know it's true, but this time YOUR geek ego
> won't allow you to capitulate.
> >
> > Try this Robbie, 1+1=2. Not 3 or 4 or whatever you normally

come

up
> > with. Repeat as necessary. Now, if you keep trying really hard
> maybe I can promote you from wannabee geek.
>
> You must be the only vp addict alive that adds 1+1 up whenever

you

> get caught misrepresenting the facts. You do that often. Any
> particular problem other than the obvious?

1+1=2, Robbie, not 1+1=blank. Now, back to drawing board until you
get it right.

> >
> > > > I'm sure the same story could be made by a lottery winner.
> Means
> > > > absolutely nothing. Of course, you know that. You keep up
this
> > > fraud
> > > > because you think it makes you look important. It doesn't,
> monkey
> > > > boy. Oh, did you forget that your wonderful publisher has
been
> > > shown to publish copyrighted material without permission? A
great
> > > reference if I ever saw one ... Birds of a feather?
> > >
> > > You keep inserting the dumb theory of lottery winners

because

you
> > > can't answer the point sensibly.
> >
> > Other than the point on your head you have yet to make a

point.

Let
> > me know when you make your first attempt. Lottery winners are
short
> > term lucky folk, just like you. Once you understand this

SIMPLE

> fact you can move on to the tougher topics of addition and
> subtraction.
>
> Here's a flash on your lottery winners. Almost every one of them

is

a
> long-term unlucky loser--even the ones who win. The last ticket
> holder who won powerball says she's been playing for years and
years
> and never won anything until then. So your theory's a little
> stretched at this point. Even YOU can't make sense of it.

Revenge

of
> the geek.

So, your position is that winning the lottery is NOT lucky.

ROTFLMAO.

Need I say more ...

> >
> > > > More BS from the BS master. Let's hear it in your

publisher

> > words. Otherwise, it means absolutely nothing coming from a
> continual liar and fraud.
> > >
> > > You believe nothing that you don't want to even if it's
notarized
> > and in front of you with the Pope blessing it. Such a sour

life

you
> are cursed with.
> >
> > No proof? I guess that pretty much means it was all a lie.
>
> You're always guessing. I'm certain that comes from your

addiction

to
> playing video poker and guessing wrong continually.

Let hear the words directly from your publisher or give it up

monkey

boy. Your continual lies are boring and tiresome. Or, wait, maybe
your mama is your publisher ...

> >
> > > After you show proof who those theoretical 'hundreds of

winning

> > > advantage players' are. Bet you can't!
> >
> > I don't need to. I have MATHEMATICAL proof (which I've

provided

you
> > many times in the past). If you want to deny the math works,

it's

> up to you to prove it. Bet you can't! Oh, just in case your

brain

has
> > another fart and you think personal results are proof, they
aren't
> > proof of squat.
>
> Historical data is proof,

LMAO. If that were the case then a lottery winner would be proof

that

everyone will win a lottery. Have I said that before??? Can't you
come up with reasonable argument to support your position without
reverting to this idiotic, worn out BS.

> and theory is on paper

Like I've pointed out to you many times ... The same theory is

behind

EVERY electronic invention you can think of. Try again, monkey boy.

> and means you dream
> of being successful because the classroom tells you it can be

done.

I AM succesful as are hundreds of other advantage players. I met
another one last night. We've moved beyond dreaming about our HS
proms and make real world decisions that bring in money. I realize
this gets to you since you failed miserably and have only your HS
memories to get you through the day.

> It can't, your sorry addict life is proof of that, and my
enjoyable,
> plentiful lifestyle is proof my methods work. Bet you can't deny
that!

More BS from the BS master. Go see that shrink. I know he can help.

> >
> > > > > > > And I also understand your denial of the
> > > > > > > compulsion that controls your life.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I explained addiction to you in detail and you had
nothing
> to
> > > > > counter my descriptions but more chest beating.
> > > > >
> > > > > You conveniently 'explained it away' when it came to

you.

> > That's spelled a clear D-E-N-I-A-L.
> > > >
> > > > You ask me to explain addiction and when I do, you call it
> denial.
> > >
> > > That's because you refuse to answer my question without

being

> > > nebulous.
> >
> > I've answered many of your questions truthfully and you ALWAYS
turn
> > right around and deny them. No reason for me to continue.
>
> More cloudy, incomplete and watered-down answers so as not to

have

to
> be pinpoint accurate. Kind of goes against your geek-creed.

Come on, Robbie, make up your mind. What about all the times

you've

called me a geek? Am I one or not? Can't you take a position and
stick with it? ... A true sign of a scammer.

> >
> > > I asked you to explain YOUR addiction, and you cloud it up
> > > with whatever comes along (albeit slowly) in that aging mind

of

> > yours.
> >
> > Why should I ever answer any of your idiotic questions about
> > addiction. You're a mindless idiot who thinks anyone who plays

VP

> > using advantage play is automatically addicted. You do this
because
> > of your projected self-image. Your own addiction causes you to
see
> it in everyone else. Well, monkey boy, I'm not addicted. Never

have

> been and never will be. It's simply not in my makeup. Get used

to

it.
>
> More denial.

It's too bad that facts bother you. Get used to it.

> And have I said how dumb and telling your defensive
> postures make you look? Of course, not to mention wordy. That's
what
> causes you the rise in blood pressure. What pills you taking for
that
> disease anyway??

Talk about wordy? Get over it, monkey boy.

> >
> > By the way, I don't smoke, don't drink and don't do drugs.

Like I

> > said, addiction is not in my makeup (except maybe for golfing).
>
> Certainly. But you eat too much. Explain that one.

Hmmmmmm. I'll admit I'm addicted to eating. I do it every day.

Maybe

I should see a eating cessation specialist. This is too good. LMAO.

> Then correlate it
> all to your habitual gambling problem.

Now that's an interesting correlation to make. I eat, I gamble, I
eat, I gamble, I eat, I gamble, ... Maybe I should give up

gambling

and lose some weight. Or, better, yet, eat more and win more money
gambling. This is so much fun ...

> >
> > > > Could it ever be more obvious to even the most casual

viewwer

> > that you dred actually discussing addiction. It would take

away

one
> of your childish name calling avenues.
> > >
> > > More denial in the form of an attack.
> >
> > Just the facts. Look in the mirror and then go get some
> professional help.
>
> The fact I just saw said Dicky would never admit he had a

gambling

> problem because that would mean the most important thing in his
life
> was a baddy. So pathetic.

Give it up, monkey boy. You've lost on the addiction topic (and

made

yourself look like a complete idiot). However, I haven't had this
good of laugh in a couple of days (since one of your previous

screw-

ups).

> >
> > > If a book on you were in front
> > > of me I couldn't read you any better than I am now.
> >
> > LMAO. Every time you've made an attempt to "read me" you've

been

> 100% wrong. On the other hand, you are as obvious as it gets.

You

> can't get around projecting your own self-image. Why do think

I'm

> always right in my descriptions of you?
>
> More denial when I hit the nail on the head. And more Pee Wee
because
> you couldn't create your own wording here again. That's OK

though.

> I'm used to setting the pace.

OK, turtle boy, keep up this amazing pace, I'm almost awake. Did I
mention that tendency of yours to project your own self image?

WELL,

HERE IT IS AGAIN.

> >
> > > > > Your problem with me is that I have several legs up on

you

on
> > > > > virtually every subject,
> > > >
> > > > You mean like the political discussion where you've been

so

> > beaten
> > > > into the ground that you are now claiming you didn't read
> certain
> > > > posts? Your legs are up alright. I think everyone can

picture

> it.
> > >
> > > More incomplete and self-confidence building statements. Can
you
> > EVER be specific or are you always so very afraid of being

made a

> fool of over and over by me?
> >
> > I was very specific. Too bad you don't like the image it

portrays.

>
> The one of you being made an old fool of over and over? I'll

never

> tire of that!

I assume you're referring to the "image" where you're losing the
political discussion to John. That's right, little mamas' boy,

you've

been outclassed there just like you have been here. Now, let's

hear

another monkey boy claim that everyone else knows is a feeble

losers'

attempt to gain respect. It will never work and deep down inside

you

know it. Go get help.

> >
> > > > > To you it depicts hate because I'm that far a more
> intelligent
> > > and sensible mind to you, and that rattles you no end. I

call

it
> > > > > superiority, and you translate that into the hate you

have

> for
> > > me. And I love it!!
> > > >
> > > > More monkey boy bravado. It comes out everytime you are

lost

> for
> > > > words. I don't need to respond to it because it means

nothing

> to
> > me
> > > > and everyone sees it for exactly what it is. FEAR and

HATE.

Go
> > get
> > > > help and you can thank me when your done.
> > >
> > > And I continue to love your discomfort with everything I
ridicule
> > you with. Better double that dose tomorrow.
> >
> > I'm very comfortable tonight (actually pretty much every

night).

I
> > finished almost dead last in a silly slot tournament this
weekend.
> > Fortunately, the gambling gods saw it fit to provide quad aces
> twice while playing FPDB between rounds (not to mention the four
3's
> and 4's). At the banquet afterwards I met some interesting

people

and
> had a really good time. As you can see, you are once more 100%
wrong
> in everything you say about me or just about anything. How does

it

> feel to ALWAYS be wrong?
>
> More gambling?? Hohoho! And isn't it just like a losing addict

to

> come out of his hole to blab whenever some winning hands are

hit? I

> watched football today with my son and daughter as the Patriots

won

> again on their way to another Super Bowl title and my wife went
> Christmas shopping. No casinos, no machines, no low-life

gamblers,

no
> crappy food at some crowded banquet of playing-fools, and
definitely
> no stupid slot tournaments. If that's the kind of day that turns
you
> on, you have waaaaaay more of a problem than I thought.

Let's see, on one hand Robbie claims he wins big bucks gambling,

on

the hand he claims it's stupid to EVER be in a casino winning

money

and having a good time. I think just about everyone can see the
hypocrisy in this statement. Your rebuttals are getting more and

more

lame every time.

> >
> > I'll give you a little hint monkey boy. For ridicule to bother
> > someone, they must respect the person dishing it out. You're

so

far
> > from making the list of people I respect it's kind of funny to
even
> > contemplate it. You are a liar, a fraud, a racist, a warmonger
and
> a REALLY stupid person. Sorry chump, but I see all your ridicule

as

> > projected at yourself (and rightly so might I add). That is

why

> I've asked you to get help.
>
> More attacks?

Just the facts. Like I said before, I'm trying to help you here.

> Gee, if my ridicule of your addiction gets you a
> wedgie, what in the world will my last paragraph do to you??

From

> what you explained, a person must respect themself before being
able
> to respect others.

Talk about self-image ... This is EXACTLY why you behave the way

you

do. Your hate for yourself spews out all the time. That is the

reason

you need to get help. You need to accept that you've been a loser

all

your life and forgive yourself. Only then can you move on.

> Your penchant for casinos and that kind of sick
> life indicates you haven't learned how to respect yourself let
alone
> others.

This is so obviously wrong and easily rebutted. I've only gambled
more than a couple times a year for the last 6 years. So how did

it

affect my "respect" for my first 50 years? Of course, it couldn't
have, which makes your idiotic attempt to make sense look as silly

as

all your previous attempts. Give it up. You know nothing about me,
other than I'm way smarter than you, and it bothers you to no end.

> I'll not get your respect

Finally, an accuracy ... I bet it doesn't continue.

> until the day you either learn a
> hard lesson that you should have been taught long ago on

gambling

and
> casino compulsions, or on your deathbed as you ask my

forgiveness

for
> your misled opinions about me. And at your 'advanced' age, you
might
> want to think that thru a bit ASAP.

I was right. ROTFLMAO. This is beyond funny. This is beyond
hilarious. And to think, Robbie probably had a straight face when

he

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
wrote it. Please, someone, make him stop, my sides are killing me.