vpFREE2 Forums

Rob Singer and Bob Dancer...not so different?

#41

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> It's also nice to see you admit "I couldn't care less about how
> anyone else does". If you really wanted to help other people as
> you've claimed many times, then you would NEVER make a statement
>like this.

Another predictable disconnect. I ALWAYS want to help other people

do

better & it's what I try to do.

Well, come on, pick one. You just said you don't care and now you say
you do.

However, if they become rich by it I
want nor get no benefit, and if they ruin I don't give them my

money.

That's called R-E-S-P-O-N-S-I-B-L-I-T-Y.

And, has nothing to do with caring.

> Ho hum. In other words, you were lying previously or, at best,
> telling a half-truth.

.....Or more likely, you never understood straight talk.

OK, you were lying. That's what I thought all along.

> It will only make those comtemplating your system think twice

about

>it. And, by the way, that is my ONLY goal in these dicussions.

Your only goal as determined by neurosis. I have a goal too. It's
called The Undeniable Truth!

No it's not. It's called a scam and as any good scamster you try to
hide the scam under seemingly good words and lofty ideals. The
problem, moron, is that everyone now sees you as you really are. A
non-caring, ego maniac promoting a worthless system that has been
PROVEN wrong time and again.

#42

Nothing?

Just about says it all.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...> wrote:

#43

That's ALL you have to counter my perfectly clear and undeniable
argurment? Monkey Boy at his best! Just admit you have no clue
whatsoever and pay Cogno his 2 million.

You're all over the map again, Mr. Wizard! Nothing you say is ever
clear, and you always have another goofy agenda.
  

Since Cogno already straightened you out here I don't have to.
However, if you really have never heard of "snake oil" before, then
you must have been institutionalized for decades.

You goofed again. Snake oil as I know it is something used in China.
If you've ever taken the time out from your geek job or nowadays
video poker ramblings, you'd have found time in your life to explore
what's real.

> I'd say that you're being a statistical geek disqualifies
yourself from ever understanding the human side of life in general.
Thus, you would never, ever be able to comprehend what I said--and
you're reply shows it.
  
No, what my replies shows very clearly is just how ridiculous
you've become. And, what is you response. Zilch, nothing but another
attempt to deflect the debate from the truth about your scam systems.

"Zilch!" another term from yesteryear that the GERMANS don't even use
any more. You're so far away from reality that you probably believe
half the baloney you write down.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#44

Well, come on, pick one. You just said you don't care and now you

say you do.

As I said, a disconnect.

> However, if they become rich by it I
> want nor get no benefit, and if they ruin I don't give them my
money. That's called R-E-S-P-O-N-S-I-B-L-I-T-Y.

And, has nothing to do with caring.

Would you care if some poor fool listened to your nonsense you write
on virtually every vp forum and beyond, about how "playing
mathematically correct is the best way to win"....and then they lost
while trying to follow the bleeder (as most do)?
  

> > It will only make those comtemplating your system think twice
about
> >it. And, by the way, that is my ONLY goal in these dicussions.
>
> Your only goal as determined by neurosis. I have a goal too. It's
> called The Undeniable Truth!

No it's not. It's called a scam and as any good scamster you try to
hide the scam under seemingly good words and lofty ideals. The
problem, moron, is that everyone now sees you as you really are. A
non-caring, ego maniac promoting a worthless system that has been
PROVEN wrong time and again.

You're wandering again. Fact is, today there are more than 5600
members who get my e-newsletter (for free, unlike how your hero
Skippy hughes operates---and I wonder why.......) and the last time
you spewed your baloney at me there were only 4100. My column in GT
continues to lead the paper in popularity. You see, you're a loner on
an island of envy & hate, and the tide keeps coming in.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#45

<<You're all over the map again, Mr. Wizard! Nothing you say is ever clear,
and you always have another goofy agenda.>>

<<You're so far away from reality that you probably believe half the baloney
you write down.>>

Do you ever get the feeling he's talking about himself?

Cogno

#46

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> Since Cogno already straightened you out here I don't have to.
> However, if you really have never heard of "snake oil" before,

then

> you must have been institutionalized for decades.

You goofed again. Snake oil as I know it is something used in

China.

If you've ever taken the time out from your geek job or nowadays
video poker ramblings, you'd have found time in your life to

explore

what's real.

Is that where you came from? Or, maybe, Outer Mongolia.

> > I'd say that you're being a statistical geek disqualifies
>yourself from ever understanding the human side of life in

general.

>Thus, you would never, ever be able to comprehend what I said--and
>you're reply shows it.
  
> No, what my replies shows very clearly is just how ridiculous
>you've become. And, what is you response. Zilch, nothing but

another

>attempt to deflect the debate from the truth about your scam

systems.

"Zilch!" another term from yesteryear that the GERMANS don't even

use

any more.

However, we Americans do. How about nada and zip? They also describe
the mental content of your posts.

You're so far away from reality that you probably believe
half the baloney you write down.

Yes, I still believe that 1-3+6 = 4. Since your system REQUIREs this
statement to be false it's pretty easy to see whose full of baloney.

#47

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> Well, come on, pick one. You just said you don't care and now you
say you do.

As I said, a disconnect.

You either care or you don't. You've now said both.

> > However, if they become rich by it I
> > want nor get no benefit, and if they ruin I don't give them my
> money. That's called R-E-S-P-O-N-S-I-B-L-I-T-Y.
>
> And, has nothing to do with caring.

Would you care if some poor fool listened to your nonsense

First of all it wouldn't be fool, it would be someone who accepts the
facts. There's around 5000 of them over on VPFREE right now and the
list grows all the time. They, along with me, know that YOU are
pretty much the only fool around here.

you write
on virtually every vp forum and beyond, about how "playing
mathematically correct is the best way to win"....and then they

lost

while trying to follow the bleeder (as most do)?

Very unlikely if they listen closely to everything, including
bankroll requirements and always looking for the BEST possible play.
A good share of my play in LV is at 102% expectation. Almost
impossible to lose.

> > > It will only make those comtemplating your system think twice
> about
> > >it. And, by the way, that is my ONLY goal in these dicussions.
> >
> > Your only goal as determined by neurosis. I have a goal too.

It's

> > called The Undeniable Truth!
>
> No it's not. It's called a scam and as any good scamster you try

to

> hide the scam under seemingly good words and lofty ideals. The
> problem, moron, is that everyone now sees you as you really are.

A

> non-caring, ego maniac promoting a worthless system that has been
> PROVEN wrong time and again.

You're wandering again. Fact is, today there are more than 5600
members who get my e-newsletter (for free, unlike how your hero
Skippy hughes operates---and I wonder why.......)

Good for wrapping fish.

and the last time
you spewed your baloney at me there were only 4100. My column in GT
continues to lead the paper in popularity. You see, you're a loner

on

an island of envy & hate, and the tide keeps coming in.

Yes, and magazines like the National Inquirer continue to sell quite
well as well. Unfortunately, there are many, many folks that are
looking for an EASY way to make money without doing the required hard
work. Why do you think there are so many scams perpetrated in this
country every day by your brethern?

#48

Is that where you came from? Or, maybe, Outer Mongolia.

The humiliating fact is, RG, that all you've got to look back on now
is inexperience in the real world, which readily explains why video
poker's taken such a stranglehold onto your life....and why you
reject me as the vp success story that little voice in the back of
your head constantly tells you I am.

> "Zilch!" another term from yesteryear that the GERMANS don't even
use any more.

> You're so far away from reality that you probably believe
> half the baloney you write down.

Yes, I still believe that 1-3+6 = 4. Since your system REQUIREs
this >statement to be false it's pretty easy to see whose full of
baloney.

You and that pathetic formula. Who cares? As if it had anything to do
with video poker. I know it makes you feel good to keep writing it
down, so go ahead and get SOME kind of a self-induced positive out of
all your ramblings.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#49

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> Is that where you came from? Or, maybe, Outer Mongolia.

The humiliating fact is, RG, that all you've got to look back on

now

is inexperience in the real world, which readily explains why video
poker's taken such a stranglehold onto your life....and why you
reject me as the vp success story that little voice in the back of
your head constantly tells you I am.

Another Monkey Boy reply. Stand up, beat your chest and say
absolutely NOTHING, ZILCH, NADA, ZIP.

> > You're so far away from reality that you probably believe
> > half the baloney you write down.

> Yes, I still believe that 1-3+6 = 4. Since your system REQUIREs
>this >statement to be false it's pretty easy to see whose full of
>baloney.

You and that pathetic formula. Who cares?

You do, because you know simple addition is all it takes to PROVE
your system cannot turn a negative expectation game into a positive
one. It gets you right in the heart of your scams every time.

As if it had anything to do
with video poker. I know it makes you feel good to keep writing it
down, so go ahead and get SOME kind of a self-induced positive out

of

all your ramblings.

I just did. But, let me say it again. A negative expectation on hand
1 + a negative expectation on hand 2 + negative expectations on all
the rest of the hands comes out negative. It's Sooooooooo simple. Oh,
and your special plays which make the expectation EVEN MORE negative
can't change the math one bit. It's all just simple addition.

#50

> Would you care if some poor fool listened to your nonsense

First of all it wouldn't be fool, it would be someone who accepts

the

facts. There's around 5000 of them over on VPFREE right now and the
list grows all the time. They, along with me, know that YOU are
pretty much the only fool around here.

You play to the fools all the time who think they'll ever win using
long-term strategy. They're all hopeless losers and you know it. Just
like you. You're always trying to make yourself feel good on every
forum going about 'video poker' (gee, what a great way to play make-
believe) by posting answers to dumb questions when nobody really
cares. It's like you're playing 'house' with these people and your
the Daddy.

Very unlikely if they listen closely to everything, including
bankroll requirements and always looking for the BEST possible

play.

A good share of my play in LV is at 102% expectation. Almost
impossible to lose.

Where's my violin?
   

Yes, and magazines like the National Inquirer continue to sell
quite well as well. Unfortunately, there are many, many folks that
are looking for an EASY way to make money without doing the required
hard work.

Video Poker? Hard 'Work'? HAHA! Are you for real? It's a game, ding-
dong. People like you confuse the masses and even the few who take it
seriously. Theories and more theories on what coulda woulda or
shoulda been. "Become addicted like me" is what you should be saying.
And you should be telling them to read the truth weekly in Gaming
today, because they certainly ain't gettin' it from anywhere else.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#51

> The humiliating fact is, RG, that all you've got to look back on
now is inexperience in the real world, which readily explains why

video poker's taken such a stranglehold onto your life....and why you

> reject me as the vp success story that little voice in the back

of your head constantly tells you I am.

Another Monkey Boy reply. Stand up, beat your chest and say
absolutely NOTHING, ZILCH, NADA, ZIP.

Looks real enough to me....esp. since it bothers you.

You do, because you know simple addition is all it takes to PROVE
your system cannot turn a negative expectation game into a positive
one. It gets you right in the heart of your scams every time.

Where's my violin, and the smallest record player in the world....

I just did. But, let me say it again. A negative expectation on

hand 1 + a negative expectation on hand 2 + negative expectations on
all the rest of the hands comes out negative. It's Sooooooooo simple.
Oh, and your special plays which make the expectation EVEN MORE

negative can't change the math one bit. It's all just simple
addition.

Oh, so those 3 times last summer (twice on $25 DDB & once on $10 DDB)
when I held 22 or 33 out of two pair and ended up with quads with
kickers EACH TIME were what? NEGATIVES?? HAHAHAHAHA! That's how
stupid you are and sound. Imagine what a fool you could be if you
tried! $50,000 and you say that's what----Negative? Oh my God, it
hurts! Now you'll say I was lucky, and now because I got you on that
one you'll be so humiliated that you'll say I'm lying. You a study in
predictability. Well here's a major flash, Einstein: The game is
based on luck! HELLO!!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#52

Is this Ike, or Mike.....

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti" <cognoscienti@g...>
wrote:

<<You're all over the map again, Mr. Wizard! Nothing you say is ever

clear,

and you always have another goofy agenda.>>

<<You're so far away from reality that you probably believe half the

baloney

···

you write down.>>

Do you ever get the feeling he's talking about himself?

Cogno

#53

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> > Would you care if some poor fool listened to your nonsense
>
> First of all it wouldn't be fool, it would be someone who accepts
the
> facts. There's around 5000 of them over on VPFREE right now and

the

> list grows all the time. They, along with me, know that YOU are
> pretty much the only fool around here.

You play to the fools all the time who think they'll ever win using
long-term strategy. They're all hopeless losers and you know it.

Hmm. I've won ... as have the many others I've had the opportunity to
talk with over the last couple of years. So, I guess this makes you a
liar once again.

Just
like you. You're always trying to make yourself feel good on every
forum going about 'video poker' (gee, what a great way to play make-
believe) by posting answers to dumb questions when nobody really
cares. It's like you're playing 'house' with these people and your
the Daddy.

Yep. He's getting very frustrated again. Rob, give it up. Everyone
knows your system is a scam. Proving that you're a moron too isn't
really necessary.

> Very unlikely if they listen closely to everything, including
> bankroll requirements and always looking for the BEST possible
play.
> A good share of my play in LV is at 102% expectation. Almost
> impossible to lose.

Where's my violin?

As if you'd have a clue what to do with one ...

> Yes, and magazines like the National Inquirer continue to sell
>quite well as well. Unfortunately, there are many, many folks that
>are looking for an EASY way to make money without doing the

required

>hard work.

Video Poker? Hard 'Work'? HAHA! Are you for real? It's a game, ding-
dong. People like you confuse the masses and even the few who take

it

seriously. Theories and more theories on what coulda woulda or
shoulda been. "Become addicted like me" is what you should be

saying.

And you should be telling them to read the truth weekly in Gaming
today, because they certainly ain't gettin' it from anywhere else.

It's a game alright. One where money can be made or lost. I choose to
make money.

How many morons does it take to screw in a light bulb (think very
carefully)?

#54

rgmustain wrote:

Another Monkey Boy reply. Stand up, beat your chest and say
absolutely NOTHING, ZILCH, NADA, ZIP.

While I hold you in esteem in many respects, Dick, cheap shots that
are of no substance seem quite beneath you. I can't see anyone being
impressed by such banter other than the most base soul.

Even if expressed entirely tongue-in-cheek, it simply falls flat with
me and deters me from looking for anything remotely insightful in your
post. I don't think this suggests I lack a healthy sense of humor.

- H.

#55

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> > The humiliating fact is, RG, that all you've got to look back

on

> now is inexperience in the real world, which readily explains why
video poker's taken such a stranglehold onto your life....and why

you

> > reject me as the vp success story that little voice in the back
of your head constantly tells you I am.
>
> Another Monkey Boy reply. Stand up, beat your chest and say
> absolutely NOTHING, ZILCH, NADA, ZIP.

Looks real enough to me....esp. since it bothers you.

Good luck. Nothing you could ever say will bother me. I see you for
EXACTLY what you are. A liar and a fraud and quite stupid in fact.

> You do, because you know simple addition is all it takes to PROVE
> your system cannot turn a negative expectation game into a

positive

> one. It gets you right in the heart of your scams every time.

Where's my violin, and the smallest record player in the world....

Still nothing to add? .... That simple addition statement gets you
every time.

> I just did. But, let me say it again. A negative expectation on
hand 1 + a negative expectation on hand 2 + negative expectations

on

all the rest of the hands comes out negative. It's Sooooooooo

simple.

Oh, and your special plays which make the expectation EVEN MORE
>negative can't change the math one bit. It's all just simple
>addition.

Oh, so those 3 times last summer (twice on $25 DDB & once on $10

DDB)

when I held 22 or 33 out of two pair and ended up with quads with
kickers EACH TIME were what? NEGATIVES?? HAHAHAHAHA!

Yep. When you add in ALL the times you got ZILCH. That's what makes
addition sooooooo correct and you soooooo wrong.

That's how
stupid you are and sound. Imagine what a fool you could be if you
tried! $50,000 and you say that's what----Negative? Oh my God, it
hurts! Now you'll say I was lucky, and now because I got you on

that

one you'll be so humiliated that you'll say I'm lying. You a study

in

predictability. Well here's a major flash, Einstein: The game is
based on luck! HELLO!!!

Hello. The game has nothing to do with luck. Some folks will
get "lucky" at times and some others will get "lucky" at other times.
However, OVER TIME it will balance out. None of your lies will ever
change this FACT.

#56

Harry, I agree with you completely. In fact, I used your suggested
approach for the first couple of months I argued with Singer last
year. Unfortunately, Rob simply doesn't "get" well thought out
intelligent replies. He thinks name calling and 3rd grade remarks make
him look smart. So, I decided to go about beating him at his own game.
Amazingly it worked and he stopped posting after a bit. If you look
closely, you will see he dismisses the facts but gets very frustrated
when I use his own techniques against him.

Dick

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Harry Porter" <harry.porter@v...>
wrote:

···

rgmustain wrote:
> Another Monkey Boy reply. Stand up, beat your chest and say
> absolutely NOTHING, ZILCH, NADA, ZIP.

While I hold you in esteem in many respects, Dick, cheap shots that
are of no substance seem quite beneath you. I can't see anyone being
impressed by such banter other than the most base soul.

Even if expressed entirely tongue-in-cheek, it simply falls flat with
me and deters me from looking for anything remotely insightful in your
post. I don't think this suggests I lack a healthy sense of humor.

- H.

#57

Hmm. I've won ... as have the many others I've had the opportunity

to talk with over the last couple of years. So, I guess this makes
you a liar once again.

Some people I believe. You I don't. Anyone who on one hand says they
aren't addicted to vp and limits their play to when "they want to for
entertainment" yet on the other brags of hitting 26 RF's in a 6-month
period (I suspect that was suppose to impress Bob Dancer) is a total
hypocrite....and a big liar. The only reason you posted the RF streak
was that you finally had something to brag about in that life-long
boring life of yours.

Yep. He's getting very frustrated again. Rob, give it up. Everyone
knows your system is a scam. Proving that you're a moron too isn't
really necessary.

Who's your Daddy, Mr. video poker success wannabee?
   

> > A good share of my play in LV is at 102% expectation. Almost
> > impossible to lose.
>
> Where's my violin?

As if you'd have a clue what to do with one ...

OK, big deal. Expectation means what? I'm supposed to lose according
to you because I HAVE no + expectation! You're just another one of
those pathological gamblers running around in LV being roped in by
all the casino promotions--just as they expect you to be. You can't
even play video poker to your terms. Maybe another Dancer class is in
order too? It's like an oil change, isn't it?
    

It's a game alright. One where money can be made or lost. I choose

to make money.

Only problem is, you're satisfied with phantom bucks while I walk out
with the cash you dream about.

How many morons does it take to screw in a light bulb (think very
carefully)?

The question should read "How many 'advantage' video poker players
foes it take?" Answer: As many as the casino manager WANTS it to take.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#58

Good luck. Nothing you could ever say will bother me. I see you for
EXACTLY what you are. A liar and a fraud and quite stupid in fact.

Ha! You've just been called by one of those whom you try to out-post
on vpFREE and WinPoker. Ha! Ouch, that's gotta hurt! I'm used to it,
but poor little Dicky? What an ego-buster!
   

> Oh, so those 3 times last summer (twice on $25 DDB & once on $10
DDB)
> when I held 22 or 33 out of two pair and ended up with quads with
> kickers EACH TIME were what? NEGATIVES?? HAHAHAHAHA!

Yep. When you add in ALL the times you got ZILCH. That's what makes
addition sooooooo correct and you soooooo wrong.

Yup. and since most of my play averages out to be on the $2 machine
and I play far fewer hands than you, you're quite right. Makes lotsa
sense.

Hello. The game has nothing to do with luck. Some folks will
get "lucky" at times and some others will get "lucky" at other

times. However, OVER TIME it will balance out. None of your lies will
ever change this FACT.

It hurts you that I've transcended all that intellectual theory,
doesn't it.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#59

Too late at making an attempt at saving face, Dicky boy........ Now
put the teddy bear away and accept your punishment like a good little
Dicky.....

Harry, I agree with you completely. In fact, I used your suggested
approach for the first couple of months I argued with Singer last
year. Unfortunately, Rob simply doesn't "get" well thought out
intelligent replies. He thinks name calling and 3rd grade remarks

make

him look smart. So, I decided to go about beating him at his own

game.

Amazingly it worked and he stopped posting after a bit. If you look
closely, you will see he dismisses the facts but gets very

frustrated

when I use his own techniques against him.

Dick

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Harry Porter"

<harry.porter@v...>

wrote:
> rgmustain wrote:
> > Another Monkey Boy reply. Stand up, beat your chest and say
> > absolutely NOTHING, ZILCH, NADA, ZIP.
>
>
> While I hold you in esteem in many respects, Dick, cheap shots

that

> are of no substance seem quite beneath you. I can't see anyone

being

> impressed by such banter other than the most base soul.
>
> Even if expressed entirely tongue-in-cheek, it simply falls flat

with

> me and deters me from looking for anything remotely insightful in

your

> post. I don't think this suggests I lack a healthy sense of

humor.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

>
> - H.

#60

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> Hmm. I've won ... as have the many others I've had the

opportunity

to talk with over the last couple of years. So, I guess this makes
you a liar once again.

Some people I believe. You I don't. Anyone who on one hand says

they

aren't addicted to vp and limits their play to when "they want to

for

entertainment" yet on the other brags of hitting 26 RF's in a 6-

month

period (I suspect that was suppose to impress Bob Dancer) is a

total

hypocrite....and a big liar.

I see you still remember my number of RFs last winter. A little envy
there? If you go back even further you will see where I once posted a
5 1/2 month RF drought. It's all part of playing VP.

The only reason you posted the RF streak
was that you finally had something to brag about in that life-long
boring life of yours.

Nope. If I remember right I posted it in a discussion of streaks.
Seems fairly appropriate to me.

> Yep. He's getting very frustrated again. Rob, give it up.

Everyone

> knows your system is a scam. Proving that you're a moron too

isn't

> really necessary.

Who's your Daddy, Mr. video poker success wannabee?

What a reply. ROTFLMAO. You obviously can't help but look like a fool.

> > > A good share of my play in LV is at 102% expectation. Almost
> > > impossible to lose.
> >
> > Where's my violin?
>
> As if you'd have a clue what to do with one ...

OK, big deal. Expectation means what? I'm supposed to lose

according

to you because I HAVE no + expectation! You're just another one of
those pathological gamblers running around in LV being roped in by
all the casino promotions--just as they expect you to be.

Hmmmm. Yep, "roped" into a $2000 drawing win last spring at Tuscany.

You can't
even play video poker to your terms. Maybe another Dancer class is

in

order too? It's like an oil change, isn't it?

I don't need to go to any Dancer classes. I already understand
EXACTLY how VP works. However, you should think about it. You might
learn something for a change.

> It's a game alright. One where money can be made or lost. I

choose

to make money.

Only problem is, you're satisfied with phantom bucks while I walk

out

with the cash you dream about.

More lies. I "walked out" with real money and I have serious doubts
about most of your claims, the claims of a scammer.