Once more you constantly babble with no content. No proof your system
is viable for the general public, no names and addresses of your
ficticious mathematitions, just more unproven assertions. How many
posts is this that I've asked you to disprove Reid's paper. You have
provided nothing yet.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> Talk about hearsay. I ask for conclusive evidence. I think you
need
a little marketing 101. Of course they target the "average" player.
> That's the largest demographic. To do anything else would not
make
> marketing sense Mr. MBA.
Here's a flash for you who have no idea how the business world
operates. Promotions target the largest overall profit-generating
centers, and NOT general quantity. That's Marketing 001. High
school
stuff. Where were you....or did they not bother with geeks. This is
not one of your laws of large numbers that you can just plant into
the real world.
If you think the advantage players, probably less than 1% of all
gamblers, is a big target compared to 99%+ of the general public, you
are beyond hope.
>
> And how is that different? How does a bet on Sunday provide and
> advantage over a bet on Saturday?
You're soooo dense. Because players who progress and even those who
don't (except you) AND who have the proper bankroll get ahead a
very
high percentage of sessions, pre-set win/loss stop-play goals mean
Sat.'s win is over with, because it's a whole new game Sun., and
goals usually are met.
This means absolutely nothing. Where does this provide an advantage?
What's the difference from me reaching my goal; cashing out; getting
up and turning around; and sitting down once again to start the NEXT
session on Sat. vs. waiting until Sun. for the NEXT session? The
correct answer is NOTHING. Anything else you say is pure BS.
You don't see that because you've never taken
the time to see that....always playing on and on and on like a
zombie.
No, I can't see it because it's pure and simple nonsense.
I asked you explain HOW it was different. You ramble on and say
nothing concrete. Let me keep it simple for you. If I flip a coin 500
times on Sat. what is the difference if the next flip is still on
Sat. or on Sun. Do the odds change?
>
> Actually, I don't think they believe that at all. They believe
it's
a series of independent events. You mean you don't understand this
and yet you continually state that advantage play doesn't work?
Why don't you finish your statement.... "that in the long-run
equate
to one long-term play session".
Well that IS true, but it's only true because each hand is an
independent event. In some ways it's kind of like a checkbook. You
make additions and subtractions, however, each transaction is
independent. Your balance is the overall result.
>
> Please provide conclusive evidence ANYONE can win more often than
an advantage player at the same denomination?
Please provide conclusive evidence that an advantage player wins
more
often or just plain more than I do!
You're the one pushing the flat earth progressive system. Reid has
shown conclusively that it doesn't work. If you state otherwise then
you need to show proof, or show where his proof is incorrect.
Otherwise you're a liar and a fraud.
> Wrong again. Each session in progression can be viewed as a
single
> event after all the results are totaled. Just like 500 coin flips
can be viewed as one event for statisical purposes. I don't care if
you believe it or not. It's a mathematical fact. Remember all
thoses
> fortune 500 companies. Same math.
There you go again. Greasing up that slide rule and rambling on as
if
playing video poker were the same as taking a math exam.
Nothing like a math exam. However, math DESCRIBES the interactions of
VP perfectly. And, you have shown NOTHING to counter this FACT.
The only
single event in vp is each hand. Period.
Once you accept this then the ONLY possible conclusion is that a
progressive system CANNOT turn a negative game into a positive
expectation. Any other statement is contrary to the basics of math,
you know ASDM (addition, subtraction, multiplication and division).
I actually am out there talking to and training a lot
of people all the time.
And that's really a scary scenario. Why does "the blind leading the
blind" pop into my head.
You're nothing more than an armchair pilot
who has opinions BASED on virtually nothing.
Other than proven scientific FACT.
>
> Now you've moved from calling me "obsessed, playing every day"
> to "you can't play much". The fact is that neither one is true.
The pattern here is that you're obsessed with the game, which leads
me to believe you play far too much for your own good when you hit
the casinos. Yes, it's a human feeling based on common sense, and I
do believe I'm right 100%. (I know if I had said 110% you'd come
out
and focus on the fact that mathematically there's nothing more than
100%.)
And once again you are 100% wrong. My average session time when
playing in LV is around 2 hours. How much did you play in Reno?
> Sure you are. Like your mythical mathematicians that analyzed
your
> system. What a crock! In addition, anyone who wasn't worried
about
> their reputation would not CONTINUALLY need to tell everyone how
> great they THINK they are.
That's because you're on the wannabee side of the tracks.
Don't you wish. I could care less about you. Your continual attempts
to push your fraudulent system (in order to boost your ego which is
clearly your single biggest attribute) is what draws my attention.
>
> > And you have shown nothing in Reid's statements that disprove
what I say.
I repeat the statement. And if I'm a guru
No, you're not a guru (other than in your own mind).
then it's because of people
who write nonsense like you do.
You look like such a fool when you call proven facts nonsense. Back
to your old flat earth position again. I can see you standing on a
platform saying "Gee, the earth sure looks flat to me, all that math
is just nonsense".
···
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote: