Hard to imagine that anyone who's been in this country for more than
a couple of years would not know this term. In fact, although this is
the Canadian Indian name for bigfoot, I believe it is known worldwide.
You have heard of bigfoot haven't you? How about Yeti?
I've focused on reality, not the make-believe.
What's a Yeti?
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
whenever possible.
Well then I salute her....with Jack Daniels!
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
She shares your opinion of LV drivers and chooses not to drive
> Hard to imagine that anyone who's been in this country for more
than
a couple of years would not know this term. In fact, although this is
the Canadian Indian name for bigfoot, I believe it is known worldwide.
> You have heard of bigfoot haven't you? How about Yeti?I've focused on reality, not the make-believe.
Focus is one thing ... ignorance is another. You've taken the latter to
new levels.
What's a Yeti?
Also known as the ABOMINABLE SNOWMAN the Yeti is a creature of Tibetan
folklore that resembles bigfoot other than it is completely white to
blend into the snowy regions it is said to inhabit.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:
Well then I salute her....with Jack Daniels!
Spoken like an alcoholic. Since your view of the world is limited to
your own VERY LIMITED experiences it is easy to see that what you say
is what you are.
> I've focused on reality, not the make-believe.
Focus is one thing ... ignorance is another. You've taken the latter
to new levels.
Yeah, I guess knowing about BIGFOOT has helped you succeed enormously!
> What's a Yeti?
Also known as the ABOMINABLE SNOWMAN the Yeti is a creature of
Tibetan folklore that resembles bigfoot other than it is completely
white to blend into the snowy regions it is said to inhabit.
I've been to Tibet twice. No one there has ever mentioned this thing.
Now that you describe it I have heard of it, but I don't think lack of
knowledge of it will cause me to get boils.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> > I've focused on reality, not the make-believe.
> Focus is one thing ... ignorance is another. You've taken the
latter
to new levels.
Yeah, I guess knowing about BIGFOOT has helped you succeed
enormously!
It's all part of the greater action ... called knowledge. Without it
you do little more than take up space.
> > What's a Yeti?
>
> Also known as the ABOMINABLE SNOWMAN the Yeti is a creature of
Tibetan folklore that resembles bigfoot other than it is completely
white to blend into the snowy regions it is said to inhabit.I've been to Tibet twice. No one there has ever mentioned this
thing.
Now that you describe it I have heard of it, but I don't think lack
of
knowledge of it will cause me to get boils.
Nope, but lack of knowledge can get you laughed at constantly. You
are a prime example.
It's all part of the greater action ... called knowledge. Without it
you do little more than take up space.
Knowledge needed to live a respectable and fruitful life is one thing,
but knowledge of trivial matters that have nothing to do with one's
direction is another. Unless, of course, you believe in 'Bigfoot"!
> I've been to Tibet twice. No one there has ever mentioned this
thing. Now that you describe it I have heard of it, but I don't think
lack of knowledge of it will cause me to get boils.
Nope, but lack of knowledge can get you laughed at constantly. You
are a prime example.
Hmmmm.... The same 'ol song from little dicky. You read about it and
you make believe you're both all-knowing and a (snicker chuckle) WORLD
traveler. I go there twice, talk to the people about their traditions,
lifestyles, history and hopes for the future--and not one native brings
up this nonsense about yeti that's got you all excited because it's
a 'relative' of Bigfeet--and the world's laughing at me. I'll take it!!
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
> It's all part of the greater action ... called knowledge. Without
it
you do little more than take up space.
Knowledge needed to live a respectable and fruitful life is one
thing,
but knowledge of trivial matters that have nothing to do with one's
direction is another. Unless, of course, you believe in 'Bigfoot"!
As usual you entirely missed the point. To have real knowledge you will
also pick up many, many "trivial" facts along the way. It is
inescapeable in achieving a well rounded education. These trivial facts
can be thought of as a gauge of ones' overall knowledge. In and of
themselves they mean nothing, however, taken as a whole they are clear
indicators of the overall knowledge of an individual. Just the fact
that you don't understand this shows a fundemental lack of knowledge.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
> Knowledge needed to live a respectable and fruitful life is one
thing,
> but knowledge of trivial matters that have nothing to do with one's
> direction is another. Unless, of course, you believe in 'Bigfoot"!As usual you entirely missed the point. To have real knowledge you
will also pick up many, many "trivial" facts along the way. It is
inescapeable in achieving a well rounded education. These trivial
facts can be thought of as a gauge of ones' overall knowledge. In and
of themselves they mean nothing, however, taken as a whole they are
clear indicators of the overall knowledge of an individual. Just the
fact that you don't understand this shows a fundemental lack of
knowledge.
Typically whenever you offer a wordy explanation to a subject that has
already been explained by the expert among us, you ramble on as if
almost in a squirmy mode.
You stick with the usual 'theories' of reading about Bigfeet and how
it's 'rounded out' your useless knowledge of most subjects here. I'll
keep my memories & understandings of having visited, chatted with, and
lived amongst natives of Tibet. You're so funny.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> > Knowledge needed to live a respectable and fruitful life is one
> thing,
> > but knowledge of trivial matters that have nothing to do with
one's
> > direction is another. Unless, of course, you believe
in 'Bigfoot"!
>
> As usual you entirely missed the point. To have real knowledge
you
will also pick up many, many "trivial" facts along the way. It is
> inescapeable in achieving a well rounded education. These trivial
facts can be thought of as a gauge of ones' overall knowledge. In
and
of themselves they mean nothing, however, taken as a whole they are
clear indicators of the overall knowledge of an individual. Just
the
fact that you don't understand this shows a fundemental lack of
knowledge.Typically whenever you offer a wordy explanation to a subject that
has
already been explained by the expert among us, you ramble on as if
almost in a squirmy mode.You stick with the usual 'theories' of reading about Bigfeet and
how
it's 'rounded out' your useless knowledge of most subjects here.
I'll
keep my memories & understandings of having visited, chatted with,
and
lived amongst natives of Tibet. You're so funny.
What? No rebuttal? Nothing but more babble to respond to my
statement? I guess I hit the proverbial nail squarely on your head.
You're too funny to argue with here. It's almost to the point of why
have you had such a sad life? I know how to make you feel better. I'll
call you Bookworm....a Well-Rounded Bookworm!
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
> You stick with the usual 'theories' of reading about Bigfeet and
how
> it's 'rounded out' your useless knowledge of most subjects here.
I'll
> keep my memories & understandings of having visited, chatted with,
and
> lived amongst natives of Tibet. You're so funny.What? No rebuttal? Nothing but more babble to respond to my
statement? I guess I hit the proverbial nail squarely on your head.
> What? No rebuttal? Nothing but more babble to respond to my
> statement? I guess I hit the proverbial nail squarely on your head.You're too funny to argue with here. It's almost to the point of why
have you had such a sad life? I know how to make you feel better.
I'll
call you Bookworm....a Well-Rounded Bookworm!
Thanks. I'll take that as a compliment. Especially since you're at the
other end of the spectrum. Now tell us how you got that MBA without
learning a single thing? Oh that's right. That claim was just another
one of your endless stream of lies.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
Thanks. I'll take that as a compliment. Especially since you're at
the other end of the spectrum.
We've seen you take anything as a compliment. I guess being called a
bookworm who's life consists of only having read about
people/places/life's experiences is a HUGE compliment for a nerd who
was laughed at in high school, turned into a loner in college, sat
in a room full of geeks at work, and now is a pathological gambler
living in LV because he (nor she) had the sense/discipline not to
get roped into being so weak-kneed to move there. Truly a sad story
for a GA course.
Now tell us how you got that MBA without
learning a single thing? Oh that's right. That claim was just
another one of your endless stream of lies.
From dicky the denier, that's an honor! BTW--My publisher is able to
set up a debate between myself and someone of my choosing, live on a
local LV radio station. You're my first choice. I just LOVE to slap
a nerd when they're down....and I don't stop! You'd have to do it at
the studio face-to-face. My only concern here is that you are always
afraid of me seeing you because you're fat and ugly, but I won't say
anything if you won't! Oh, tell your wife she can get her vp fix at
a nearby PJ's for the time we're in the booth....or doesn't she do
anything without the slave master?? After all, that's why she moved
to LV, right?! HAHAHA! Go for it little dicky!!!
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> Thanks. I'll take that as a compliment. Especially since you're
at
the other end of the spectrum.
We've seen you take anything as a compliment. I guess being called
a
bookworm who's life consists of only having read about
people/places/life's experiences is a HUGE compliment for a nerd
who
was laughed at in high school, turned into a loner in college, sat
in a room full of geeks at work, and now is a pathological gambler
living in LV because he (nor she) had the sense/discipline not to
get roped into being so weak-kneed to move there. Truly a sad story
for a GA course.
The babble-meister is at it again. Maybe some day, probably in the
distant future, you could at least try to say something intelligent.
Now tell us how you got that MBA without
> learning a single thing? Oh that's right. That claim was just
another one of your endless stream of lies.From dicky the denier, that's an honor!
I see you finally got the spelling right.
BTW--My publisher is able to
set up a debate between myself and someone of my choosing, live on
a
local LV radio station. You're my first choice. I just LOVE to slap
a nerd when they're down....and I don't stop! You'd have to do it
at
the studio face-to-face.
Face-to-face on a radio show. What a concept. LMAO.
My only concern here is that you are always
afraid of me seeing you because you're fat and ugly, but I won't
say
anything if you won't! Oh, tell your wife she can get her vp fix at
a nearby PJ's for the time we're in the booth....or doesn't she do
anything without the slave master?? After all, that's why she moved
to LV, right?! HAHAHA! Go for it little dicky!!!
I've heard all your BS already, why would I subject myself to more of
the same lies? What's in it for me??? Besides, I realize that in
that kind of setting it is easy for you to spout off the same old BS
while a factual representation would go over the heads of most
people. Let's face it, most people still believe there's a switch in
the backroom to turn on and off the payouts. On the other hand it
could be fun to see you lying through your teeth in person.
By the way, since you're so jealous of me you can come and watch me
play anytime you want (and find out just how fat and ugly I am). Just
let me know when you're in town and I'll tell you where I'm playing.
Or, we could meet at the bowling lanes, golf course or tennis courts
and see what a REAL nerd like you looks like when trying a skill
sport. I'll be sure to bring my video camera to get some good laughs.
The babble-meister is at it again. Maybe some day, probably in the
distant future, you could at least try to say something intelligent.
Well of course that's what it is to you, little dicky! You don't want
to hear it cause it's true!!
> Now tell us how you got that MBA without
> > learning a single thing? Oh that's right. That claim was just
> another one of your endless stream of lies.
> From dicky the denier, that's an honor!
I see you finally got the spelling right.
It's all for you to identify, little dicky. right in front of your
eyes--and you missed another one!
Face-to-face on a radio show. What a concept. LMAO.
I see you've never been involved with the media--big surprise from
one who's lead such a sheltered - and now controlled - life. They do
it all the time--I've been in 3 of them. 3-0. Care to take on the
champ?
I've heard all your BS already, why would I subject myself to more
of the same lies? What's in it for me???
Here ya go! How about you try to prove I'm a liar in public? Go ahead-
--step up to the plate. See if you can hit me! You're a problem
gambler in life. Why not utilize that vice and go for it??
Besides, I realize that in
that kind of setting it is easy for you to spout off the same old
BS while a factual representation would go over the heads of most
people.
You gotta be wheezing violently while you're typing that. Whine,
wimper, and chicken out. I'll be sure to mention it on my next
appearance. But you won't care....as long as you got your video poker
machines to take ahold of you then all's fine with little and Mrs.
dicky.
Let's face it, most people still believe there's a switch in
the backroom to turn on and off the payouts. On the other hand it
could be fun to see you lying through your teeth in person.
Then why weasel out?? Let's do it!
By the way, since you're so jealous of me you can come and watch me
play anytime you want (and find out just how fat and ugly I am).
Just let me know when you're in town and I'll tell you where I'm
playing.
I'll be more than happy to. I'll be in town the evening of Feb. 9th
until the 12th. Set up the time and place on the 11th anytime.
Or, we could meet at the bowling lanes, golf course or tennis
courts and see what a REAL nerd like you looks like when trying a
skill sport. I'll be sure to bring my video camera to get some good
laughs.
I don't bowl anymore--too many degenerates hanging around those
filthy places. Esp. in LV--they gotta all be video poker local
addicts. Tennis--I play 3 times a week under the lights. Set up a
time and place and we'll make a wager on the outcome. You can even
throw in your wife as your doubles partner against just me. Golf?
HAHAHA! I'm not old enough to play that lazy man's sport yet. But if
you'd like to cut out the nonsensical 'activities, since I jog 3.5
miles a day, how about you pick the course and I can watch you're fat
butt drag from sitting at the machines all the time? I'll even give
you a 1-mile head start! Let's do it!
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> The babble-meister is at it again. Maybe some day, probably in
the
> distant future, you could at least try to say something
intelligent.
Well of course that's what it is to you, little dicky! You don't
want
to hear it cause it's true!!
Your version of the truth would be better called truthiness. You
still know nothing about me that I haven't explicitly told you. You
never backed up your claims to post information about me, which made
that claim just another one of your endless lies.
> Face-to-face on a radio show. What a concept. LMAO.
I see you've never been involved with the media--big surprise from
one who's lead such a sheltered - and now controlled - life. They
do
it all the time--I've been in 3 of them. 3-0. Care to take on the
champ?
Once again your ENTIRELY missed the point. Since no one can see what
is going on it doesn't matter if you're are face-to-face or 1000s of
miles apart. I wish I didn't have explain simple comments to you ALL
of the time.
> I've heard all your BS already, why would I subject myself to
more
of the same lies? What's in it for me???
Here ya go! How about you try to prove I'm a liar in public? Go
ahead-
--step up to the plate. See if you can hit me! You're a problem
gambler in life. Why not utilize that vice and go for it??
No way to prove the unprovable. I can tell you exactly what would
happen right now. You'd go on and on about your unprovable success
and claim that AP doesn't work. I would state the mathematical
principles (which would leave about 90% of the audience behind) and
state the statistical possibilities. Nothing would change.
Besides, I realize that in
> that kind of setting it is easy for you to spout off the same old
BS while a factual representation would go over the heads of most
> people.You gotta be wheezing violently while you're typing that. Whine,
wimper, and chicken out. I'll be sure to mention it on my next
appearance. But you won't care....as long as you got your video
poker
machines to take ahold of you then all's fine with little and Mrs.
dicky.
Nope, just stating the facts. You know those little things you love
to ignore.
Let's face it, most people still believe there's a switch in
> the backroom to turn on and off the payouts. On the other hand it
> could be fun to see you lying through your teeth in person.Then why weasel out?? Let's do it!
Like I said, what's in it for me? I can almost guarantee that it
would be a complete waste of my time.
> By the way, since you're so jealous of me you can come and watch
me
> play anytime you want (and find out just how fat and ugly I am).
Just let me know when you're in town and I'll tell you where I'm
playing.I'll be more than happy to. I'll be in town the evening of Feb. 9th
until the 12th. Set up the time and place on the 11th anytime.
I'll let you know when my plans are in place.
> Or, we could meet at the bowling lanes, golf course or tennis
courts and see what a REAL nerd like you looks like when trying a
skill sport. I'll be sure to bring my video camera to get some good
laughs.I don't bowl anymore--too many degenerates hanging around those
filthy places. Esp. in LV--they gotta all be video poker local
addicts. Tennis--I play 3 times a week under the lights. Set up a
time and place and we'll make a wager on the outcome. You can even
throw in your wife as your doubles partner against just me. Golf?
HAHAHA! I'm not old enough to play that lazy man's sport yet.
Translation: No skills.
But if
you'd like to cut out the nonsensical 'activities, since I jog 3.5
miles a day, how about you pick the course and I can watch you're
fat
butt drag from sitting at the machines all the time? I'll even give
you a 1-mile head start! Let's do it!
Can't jog anymore due to my knee problems (acl). But it would be
interesting to see you play tennis. I haven't played since my knee
surgery in 2002 but I suspect I could still hobble around enough to
take you on.
Your version of the truth would be better called truthiness.
Is that one of the 'cultural words' I missed out on from living
overseas so long?
You
still know nothing about me that I haven't explicitly told you. You
never backed up your claims to post information about me, which
made that claim just another one of your endless lies.
Wrong, and you sure seem to be concerned about it with wording that
is designed to make yourself feel confident.
Once again your ENTIRELY missed the point. Since no one can see
what is going on it doesn't matter if you're are face-to-face or
1000s of miles apart. I wish I didn't have explain simple comments to
you ALL of the time.
What you're really doing is trying to backpeddal here. First you say
it would be interesting to actually "see me lying thru my teeth" and
now this. Why?
No way to prove the unprovable. I can tell you exactly what would
happen right now. You'd go on and on about your unprovable success
and claim that AP doesn't work. I would state the mathematical
principles (which would leave about 90% of the audience behind) and
state the statistical possibilities. Nothing would change.
I see several issues with you here. The most glaring is you think
you're smarter than 90% of the rest. That's typical feel-good
nonsense from the geek population out there. 2nd, I'd offer up a bet
($500,000) to you that I could support my past winning reporting with
indisputable facts--just as you have predictably kept a safe distance
from a few months ago, and I'd offer that if you disputed them for
any reason, I'd pay for an outside arbitrator to decide for us--an
arbitrator that both you and I would agree upon. In the end a
decision based wholly on a combination of undeniable facts and common
sense reasoning would prevail--and would be final. Could you go with
that? You KNOW I'm wrong, a liar, and the math just couldn't POSSIBLY
tell a lie, so why not? Seems you're safe and a half-million
wealthier without having to do a thing but accept.
I'll let you know when my plans are in place.
By the 7th please. I need to charge my camera's batteries to prove it
happened. you don't have a problem putting a short video up on my
site I hope.
Translation: No skills.
Golf = no skills. I bowled for fun and to chase loose women who drink
too much. No need for that any more. My wife won't let me! You see,
she cares about me MORE THAN she does about video poker, and vice-
versa. Oughta try it sometime.
Can't jog anymore due to my knee problems (acl). But it would be
interesting to see you play tennis. I haven't played since my knee
surgery in 2002 but I suspect I could still hobble around enough to
take you on.
I have a foot problem (fracture from 1998 that didn't and won't
totally heal) and every day I jog/walk I do it in sometimes severe
pain. Esp. afterwards. Why can't you pressure your knee?
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> Your version of the truth would be better called truthiness.
Is that one of the 'cultural words' I missed out on from living
overseas so long?
It means a wish for something to be truthful.
You
> still know nothing about me that I haven't explicitly told you.
You
> never backed up your claims to post information about me, which
made that claim just another one of your endless lies.Wrong, and you sure seem to be concerned about it with wording that
is designed to make yourself feel confident.
I am confident. If you knew any little thing about me you'd be
splattering it all over the forum.
>
> Once again your ENTIRELY missed the point. Since no one can see
what is going on it doesn't matter if you're are face-to-face or
1000s of miles apart. I wish I didn't have explain simple comments
to
you ALL of the time.
What you're really doing is trying to backpeddal here. First you
say
it would be interesting to actually "see me lying thru my teeth"
and
now this. Why?
No backpedaling. Both are true. I just don't see enough merit in
seeing you lie to overcome the overall waste of time.
> No way to prove the unprovable. I can tell you exactly what would
> happen right now. You'd go on and on about your unprovable
success
> and claim that AP doesn't work. I would state the mathematical
> principles (which would leave about 90% of the audience behind)
and
> state the statistical possibilities. Nothing would change.
I see several issues with you here. The most glaring is you think
you're smarter than 90% of the rest.
In math I'd say it's closer to 99%. In other areas I might be in the
lower 1%. Even the most well educated people know very little if you
get right down to it.
That's typical feel-good
nonsense from the geek population out there. 2nd, I'd offer up a
bet
($500,000) to you that I could support my past winning reporting
with
indisputable facts--just as you have predictably kept a safe
distance
from a few months ago, and I'd offer that if you disputed them for
any reason, I'd pay for an outside arbitrator to decide for us--an
arbitrator that both you and I would agree upon. In the end a
decision based wholly on a combination of undeniable facts and
common
sense reasoning would prevail--and would be final. Could you go
with
that?
I've already told you that my simulations show that it is possible
for you to have won. In fact, the highest winner using a 6 level
progression for 250 sessions came out to a cool 1.7 Million. The
problem is that you are in the upper 1% of the results. Possible,
yes ... just like winning the lottery and other low odds gambles. My
whole point has always been that your success is meaningless to
anyone who is trying to determine the BEST approach to gambling. My
simulations clearly show that the progression adds nothing to the
expected results, it simply increases the spread of possible results.
You KNOW I'm wrong, a liar, and the math just couldn't POSSIBLY
tell a lie, so why not? Seems you're safe and a half-million
wealthier without having to do a thing but accept.
Correctomunde. The math DOES show your results are possible. It still
doesn't change the fact that you have lied about so many other things
that it's tough keeping a scorecard. It also doesn't change the fact
that your results are meaningless. It is also true that my own
winning results are meaningless for anyone wishing to decide what
approach to use to gamble. No single persons' results have any effect
on what will happen to a new gambler (or an old gambler) in the
future). HOWEVER, if they want to give themselves the BEST chance to
win, then AP is BY FAR the best approach for them to use.
> I'll let you know when my plans are in place.
By the 7th please. I need to charge my camera's batteries to prove
it
happened. you don't have a problem putting a short video up on my
site I hope.
The tennis match? Should be fun.
> Translation: No skills.
Golf = no skills. I bowled for fun and to chase loose women who
drink
too much. No need for that any more. My wife won't let me! You see,
she cares about me MORE THAN she does about video poker, and vice-
versa. Oughta try it sometime.
I bowl for profit and play VP for profit. In neither case am I at all
interested in loose women.
> Can't jog anymore due to my knee problems (acl). But it would be
> interesting to see you play tennis. I haven't played since my
knee
> surgery in 2002 but I suspect I could still hobble around enough
to
> take you on.
I have a foot problem (fracture from 1998 that didn't and won't
totally heal)
My wife had the same thing two years ago. I'm surprised you would
still jog.
and every day I jog/walk I do it in sometimes severe
pain. Esp. afterwards. Why can't you pressure your knee?
I ruptured the acl back in '87 and had a miss diagnosis (they told me
it was a strain). It really didn't effect me too much other than I
had to give up softball and basketball. I could still do the sports
that were important to me. I could jog as well. However, the lack of
support resulted in a torn miniscus that I had operated on in 2002
(they removed 35%). The acl is still non-existent so I have to watch
out for additional wear and tear. As a result I now use a stationary
bike for my cardiovascular exercise and I doubt the knee will ever be
as strong as I'd like.
It means a wish for something to be truthful.
You mean it's YOUR wish for something to be truthful. I just looked
the word up in a new Webster's dictionary on the word, and guess
what? Your make-believe life conjured up yet another fake word
available only on weirdo unofficial websites. Should we be
surprised??
I am confident. If you knew any little thing about me you'd be
splattering it all over the forum.
No, because I don't do illegal things. You would look at it as
slander because the truth about you is not what you want printed in
public. I'm saving it for the right time, the right place, and for
when I can manipulate you into signing up to allow me to release your
sad story. That's why i want you in that booth. An agreement has to
be signed before any discussion.
No backpedaling. Both are true. I just don't see enough merit in
seeing you lie to overcome the overall waste of time.
Backpeddaling. no other weasel wording can get you to change that.
> I see several issues with you here. The most glaring is you think
> you're smarter than 90% of the rest.In math I'd say it's closer to 99%.
Not from what I've seen. You might be good at programming something
to spit out results you programmed it to do, but I'm certain from
what I've seen that even I am miles ahead of your pure math ability.
Remember, you nerds worked for me and jumped at my every demand.
In other areas I might be in the lower 1%. Even the most well
educated people know very little if you get right down to it.
That I don't disagree with, even though I know I am far smarter than
99.9% of the population of this day. A school education alone means
nothing. What makes the difference is in the lives we lead.
I've already told you that my simulations show that it is possible
for you to have won. In fact, the highest winner using a 6 level
progression for 250 sessions came out to a cool 1.7 Million. The
problem is that you are in the upper 1% of the results. Possible,
yes ... just like winning the lottery and other low odds gambles.
My
whole point has always been that your success is meaningless to
anyone who is trying to determine the BEST approach to gambling. My
simulations clearly show that the progression adds nothing to the
expected results, it simply increases the spread of possible
results.
Have you read my latest column that I posted? What you believe is 1%
or 15% or 45% is meaningless. Simulations mean nothing to the real
gambler. Experience and actual history is what does matter. In my
friend's case, he's one of you but he isn't successful after 10
years. He wanted me to put in the article "How long does it take--
7000 years to get even with the math?" But I didn't want to pound
away at advantage players all at once.
> You KNOW I'm wrong, a liar, and the math just couldn't POSSIBLY
> tell a lie, so why not? Seems you're safe and a half-million
> wealthier without having to do a thing but accept.Correctomunde. The math DOES show your results are possible. It
still
doesn't change the fact that you have lied about so many other
things
that it's tough keeping a scorecard. It also doesn't change the
fact
that your results are meaningless. It is also true that my own
winning results are meaningless for anyone wishing to decide what
approach to use to gamble. No single persons' results have any
effect
on what will happen to a new gambler (or an old gambler) in the
future). HOWEVER, if they want to give themselves the BEST chance
to win, then AP is BY FAR the best approach for them to use.
OK, so isn't a 99% probability that I'm full of it worth appearing on
a radio show and taking the bet? You swear by the numbers. It doesn't
get any better than 99%, correct?
The tennis match? Should be fun.
Did I miss something? Are you OK with the short video? Let's get that
settled first. Tennis is fine, but I'll warn you in advance. My
technique isn't very good, but my stamina is Aces. I'd like to play
best of 7. You could win in 4 sets.
I bowl for profit and play VP for profit. In neither case am I at
all interested in loose women.
How do you bowl for profit? You mean people in LV can't even get
involved in a recreational sport without resorting to some form of
gambling? BTW--The BEST part of LV is its loose women.
> I have a foot problem (fracture from 1998 that didn't and won't
> totally heal)
My wife had the same thing two years ago. I'm surprised you would
still jog.
I have incomparable determination, even if it does my foot in. The
problem is I refuse to let my family see a physical weakness because
I've been in such good shape my whole life. You actually know more
than them right now.
> and every day I jog/walk I do it in sometimes severe
> pain. Esp. afterwards. Why can't you pressure your knee?I ruptured the acl back in '87 and had a miss diagnosis (they told
me
it was a strain). It really didn't effect me too much other than I
had to give up softball and basketball. I could still do the sports
that were important to me. I could jog as well. However, the lack
of
support resulted in a torn miniscus that I had operated on in 2002
(they removed 35%). The acl is still non-existent so I have to
watch
out for additional wear and tear. As a result I now use a
stationary
bike for my cardiovascular exercise and I doubt the knee will ever
be as strong as I'd like.
Sounds like a basketball player's woes. And did you know that Jerome
Bettis can't walk until 15-20 minutes AFTER he gets out of bed in the
morning due to his knee problems? I once saw him crawl to the
bathroom on a sports show. He said he does that daily.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> It means a wish for something to be truthful.
You mean it's YOUR wish for something to be truthful. I just looked
the word up in a new Webster's dictionary on the word, and guess
what? Your make-believe life conjured up yet another fake word
available only on weirdo unofficial websites. Should we be
surprised??
The way it works is a word gets used and THEN it makes it into the
dictionary. I thought someone who is smarter than "99.9% of the
population" would understand this commonly known fact. By the way,
google came up with 13100 hits and try this out for size,
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/01/07/word.contest.ap/
> I am confident. If you knew any little thing about me you'd be
> splattering it all over the forum.No, because I don't do illegal things.
There's a lot of non-illegal facts about me that you also haven't
figured out. Keep the lies coming, it's so obvious.
You would look at it as
slander because the truth about you is not what you want printed in
public.
I have ABSOLUTELY nothing to hide. So, post away.
I'm saving it for the right time, the right place, and for
when I can manipulate you into signing up to allow me to release
your
sad story. That's why i want you in that booth. An agreement has to
be signed before any discussion.
The lies just keep on coming. You should be called the "everready"
liar.
> No backpedaling. Both are true. I just don't see enough merit in
> seeing you lie to overcome the overall waste of time.Backpeddaling. no other weasel wording can get you to change that.
No, to backpedal I would have needed to agree in the first place.
you'd think someone who is smarter than "99.9% of the population"
would understand this well known fact.
> > I see several issues with you here. The most glaring is you
think
> > you're smarter than 90% of the rest.
>
> In math I'd say it's closer to 99%.Not from what I've seen. You might be good at programming something
to spit out results you programmed it to do, but I'm certain from
what I've seen that even I am miles ahead of your pure math
ability.
Then why haven't you figured out that 1+1=2? You know the fact that
ones' overall expectation is simply the sum of the individual ones.
Remember, you nerds worked for me and jumped at my every demand.
Keep those lies a coming. I already know that someone who has never
heard of Dilbert never worked in corporate America.
>In other areas I might be in the lower 1%. Even the most well
educated people know very little if you get right down to it.That I don't disagree with, even though I know I am far smarter
than
99.9% of the population of this day. A school education alone means
nothing. What makes the difference is in the lives we lead.
LMAO.
> I've already told you that my simulations show that it is
possible
> for you to have won. In fact, the highest winner using a 6 level
> progression for 250 sessions came out to a cool 1.7 Million. The
> problem is that you are in the upper 1% of the results. Possible,
> yes ... just like winning the lottery and other low odds gambles.
My
> whole point has always been that your success is meaningless to
> anyone who is trying to determine the BEST approach to gambling.
My
> simulations clearly show that the progression adds nothing to the
> expected results, it simply increases the spread of possible
results.Have you read my latest column that I posted? What you believe is
1%
or 15% or 45% is meaningless. Simulations mean nothing to the real
gambler.
LMAO again.
Experience and actual history is what does matter.
Still LMAO. History means squat in determining your next hand.
Experience is useful in determining the best plays and understanding
how to get the most out of casinos.
In my
friend's case, he's one of you but he isn't successful after 10
years. He wanted me to put in the article "How long does it take--
7000 years to get even with the math?" But I didn't want to pound
away at advantage players all at once.
One gambler means nothing. Just like your results. Let's see you
randomly select 100 APers and check their results. It's called
sampling and is used by corporations all the time. It's the only way
to TRULY understand the situation. Of course, you'd never go for this
because it would demonstrate you've been wrong all this time.
Although not completely random the VPfree poll on 2005 results come
pretty close. It shows approximately half the gamblers turned a
profit. Since many of the responders are from outside of LV, where
positive plays are much more rare, the results are pretty much what
would be predicted by the math models and simulations.
> > You KNOW I'm wrong, a liar, and the math just couldn't POSSIBLY
> > tell a lie, so why not? Seems you're safe and a half-million
> > wealthier without having to do a thing but accept.
>
> Correctomunde. The math DOES show your results are possible. It
still
> doesn't change the fact that you have lied about so many other
things
> that it's tough keeping a scorecard. It also doesn't change the
fact
> that your results are meaningless. It is also true that my own
> winning results are meaningless for anyone wishing to decide what
> approach to use to gamble. No single persons' results have any
effect
> on what will happen to a new gambler (or an old gambler) in the
> future). HOWEVER, if they want to give themselves the BEST chance
to win, then AP is BY FAR the best approach for them to use.OK, so isn't a 99% probability that I'm full of it worth appearing
on
a radio show and taking the bet? You swear by the numbers. It
doesn't
get any better than 99%, correct?
No. I'd take a bet on your next 100 sessions. This would be like
betting against a lottery winner that they couldn't win the lottery.
The odds would be even better but it would still be a bad bet.
> The tennis match? Should be fun.
Did I miss something? Are you OK with the short video? Let's get
that
settled first. Tennis is fine, but I'll warn you in advance. My
technique isn't very good, but my stamina is Aces. I'd like to play
best of 7. You could win in 4 sets.
You'd think the fact I haven't played in over 4 years would be
enough, but I used to play 3 hours straight in the summer heat so I
doubt 4 quick 6-0 sets would cause me to sweat very much.
>
> I bowl for profit and play VP for profit. In neither case am I at
all interested in loose women.How do you bowl for profit?
Tournaments.
> > I have a foot problem (fracture from 1998 that didn't and won't
> > totally heal)> My wife had the same thing two years ago. I'm surprised you would
> still jog.I have incomparable determination, even if it does my foot in. The
problem is I refuse to let my family see a physical weakness
because
I've been in such good shape my whole life. You actually know more
than them right now.
Sometimes it better to admit ones' weaknesses. They catch up with you
sooner or later.
> > and every day I jog/walk I do it in sometimes severe
> > pain. Esp. afterwards. Why can't you pressure your knee?
>
> I ruptured the acl back in '87 and had a miss diagnosis (they
told
me
> it was a strain). It really didn't effect me too much other than
I
> had to give up softball and basketball. I could still do the
sports
> that were important to me. I could jog as well. However, the lack
of
> support resulted in a torn miniscus that I had operated on in
2002
> (they removed 35%). The acl is still non-existent so I have to
watch
> out for additional wear and tear. As a result I now use a
stationary
> bike for my cardiovascular exercise and I doubt the knee will
ever
be as strong as I'd like.
Sounds like a basketball player's woes. And did you know that
Jerome
Bettis can't walk until 15-20 minutes AFTER he gets out of bed in
the
morning due to his knee problems? I once saw him crawl to the
bathroom on a sports show. He said he does that daily.
I suspect that's why he plans on retiring after the Super Bowl.