vpFREE2 Forums

Give it up!

#1

I think it is really funny to see two grown men go back and forth, it's
almost a game, I think it gives them something to look forward to!!
Grumpy Old Men

In a message dated 1/11/2006 9:49:31 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
dlvseuss@cox.net writes:

i also think it is entertaining.

···

----- Original Message -----
From: g sang
To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [FREEvpFREE] Give it up!

Gentlemen: How about taking your childish
name-calling, "did to -did not", aimless chatter
someplace else. It has gone nowhere for the last
several months, and there is little hope of the banter
going anywhere productive in the future.

Give it up, guys. It soooo boring.

Geo. S.

--- rgmustain <rgmustain@att.net> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111"
<rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain"
<rgmustain@a...>
> wrote:
> >
> > I knew you'd still deny the truth even when it's
in black and
> white. It's ABSOLUTELY CLEAR in the referenced
compact. This little
> item shows you will lie and deny the facts no
matter what to
protect
> your ego. A famous person once said "It takes a
big man to admit
his
> > mistakes". Well, without a shadow of a doubt,
Rob Singer, you are
> a very LITTLE man.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#2

I think it is really funny to see two grown men go back and forth,

it's almost a game, I think it gives them something to look forward
to!!

Grumpy Old Men

But wait! He's the old man, not me! Only old men move to LV because
they've lost their minds by then. Besides, it's F-U-N! At least for me.
I can't imagine (okay, I can!) what it does to a nerd......

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, vaycaymom@a... wrote:

#3

But wait! He's the old man, not me! Only old men move to LV because
they've lost their minds by then. Besides, it's F-U-N! At least for

me.

I can't imagine (okay, I can!) what it does to a nerd......

I see Robbie quit responding to the thread on Indian gaming. If anyone
doesn't understand what it means let me fill you in. It means Rob has
admitted defeat. However, he will never admit it directly. He just puts
his tail between his legs and starts off on something new. In this case
it's babbling his tried and tired insults as if they had any impact
whatsoever.

I wonder if Rob could ever respond to a message if you removed addict,
denial, geek/nerd, fat and old from his rather limited vocabulary? You
see, these are Robs' self/wife images that he attempts to stamp on
others no matter what the situation.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...> wrote:

#4

I think it is really funny to see two grown men go back and forth,

it's

almost a game, I think it gives them something to look forward to!!
Grumpy Old Men

I'm glad we're so entertaining. Maybe we should start charging
admission. I know Rob could use the bucks so he could say his wife
isn't the only bread winner of the family.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, vaycaymom@a... wrote:

#5

anyone doesn't understand what it means let me fill you in. It means
Rob has admitted defeat. However, he will never admit it directly. He
just puts his tail between his legs and starts off on something new. In
this case it's babbling his tried and tired insults as if they had any
impact whatsoever. I wonder if Rob could ever respond to a message if
you removed addict, denial, geek/nerd, fat and old from his rather
limited vocabulary? You see, these are Robs' self/wife images that he
attempts to stamp on others no matter what the situation.

..........and so said a member of "The Family That Gambles Together
Lives in Shambles Together."

Hmmmm....I wonder though, how geneorus of me to label two lonely old
people with an addiction problem, a 'family'?! You own me one, DENYER!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

I see Robbie quit responding to the thread on Indian gaming. If

#6

Hey, BTW, I just saw where IBM's stock took a little-dicky-like Direct
Hit today because of, well, here's the headline from Yahoo--"• SEC
opens formal investigation of IBM"

Looks like the denyer loses money in more ways than one! Too bad the
wife never had a real job. Crankin' that whip all those years led her
straight to the video poker machines. What a man!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

I'm glad we're so entertaining. Maybe we should start charging
admission. I know Rob could use the bucks so he could say his wife
isn't the only bread winner of the family.

#7

Hey, BTW, I just saw where IBM's stock took a little-dicky-like

Direct

Hit today because of, well, here's the headline from Yahoo--"• SEC
opens formal investigation of IBM"

Wrong again. I unloaded all my IBM stock long ago. Do you ever get
anything right?

Looks like the denyer loses money in more ways than one! Too bad the
wife never had a real job. Crankin' that whip all those years led her
straight to the video poker machines. What a man!

One more post where little Robbie can't come up with a new word.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...> wrote:

#8

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> I see Robbie quit responding to the thread on Indian gaming. If
anyone doesn't understand what it means let me fill you in. It

means

Rob has admitted defeat. However, he will never admit it directly.

He

just puts his tail between his legs and starts off on something

new. In

this case it's babbling his tried and tired insults as if they had

any

impact whatsoever. I wonder if Rob could ever respond to a message

if

you removed addict, denial, geek/nerd, fat and old from his rather
limited vocabulary? You see, these are Robs' self/wife images that

he

attempts to stamp on others no matter what the situation.

Hmmmm....I wonder though, how geneorus of me to label two lonely

old

people with an addiction problem, a 'family'?! You own me one,

DENYER!

Can I call them, or what? One more post with no original content.

Has anyone ever wondered why Rob is so enamored with me and my wife?
Could it be because he wishes he could have the same lifestyle???
Just a possibility.

#9

Here's your answer! You're a posting lunatic on all the forums that you
BEG to be made fun of for your being a self-proclaimed nerd, your make-
belive content, and your obvious addiction to video poker - only you
don't see it. You don't see corn when you don't realize what corn is.
I'm just here to magnify how dumb you are. But your wife....now there's
a good one. I never knew anything about he until you posted how it was
HER that dragged YOU into playing vp, thereby doing what all
pathological liars and gamblers cannot help but do--blame others for
their problems. Thus dicky the denyer. So I figured, if you showed no
respect for her, then why should I? Get the picture, or do I need to
explain it numerically?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

Has anyone ever wondered why Rob is so enamored with me and my wife?

#10

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> Has anyone ever wondered why Rob is so enamored with me and my

wife?

Here's your answer! You're a posting lunatic on all the forums that

you

BEG to be made fun of for your being a self-proclaimed nerd, your

make-

belive content, and your obvious addiction to video poker - only

you

don't see it. You don't see corn when you don't realize what corn

is.

I'm just here to magnify how dumb you are. But your wife....now

there's

a good one. I never knew anything about he until you posted how it

was

HER that dragged YOU into playing vp,

Never said that. As usual you can't get even the smallest little
detail correct.

thereby doing what all
pathological liars and gamblers cannot help but do--blame others

for

their problems. Thus dicky the denyer. So I figured, if you showed

no

respect for her, then why should I? Get the picture, or do I need

to

explain it numerically?

Still no original thoughts? This makes it 3 in a row since I
challenged you to do a single new and creative post. By the way, the
word is spelled D E N I E R. If your going to use it all the time at
least get it right. LMAO.

#11

> Here's your answer! You're a posting lunatic on all the forums

that

you
> BEG to be made fun of for your being a self-proclaimed nerd, your
make-
> belive content, and your obvious addiction to video poker - only
you
> don't see it. You don't see corn when you don't realize what corn
is.
> I'm just here to magnify how dumb you are. But your wife....now
there's
> a good one. I never knew anything about he until you posted how

it was HER that dragged YOU into playing vp,

Never said that. As usual you can't get even the smallest little
detail correct.

Have I mentioned that you are dicky the denyer lately??

> thereby doing what all
> pathological liars and gamblers cannot help but do--blame others
for their problems. Thus dicky the denyer. So I figured, if you

showed no respect for her, then why should I? Get the picture, or do
I need to explain it numerically?

Still no original thoughts?

Don't need any when I'm on-a-roll with the truth. It's like spanking
you with BOTH hands!

This makes it 3 in a row since I

challenged you to do a single new and creative post. By the way,

the word is spelled D E N I E R. If your going to use it all the time
at least get it right. LMAO.

Nope--look back at the first time I labeled you and you'll see it's
spelled correctly. I changed it to correspond to the 'y' in dicky. It
just didn't look as belittling with the 'i'. The limits of your
beating here are making my head shake in bewilderment. And IBM
actually PAID you? But go see Hostel as I've said, and you'll be out
of this world and into another for almost 2 hours.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#12

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> > Here's your answer! You're a posting lunatic on all the forums
that
> you
> > BEG to be made fun of for your being a self-proclaimed nerd,

your

> make-
> > belive content, and your obvious addiction to video poker -

only

> you
> > don't see it. You don't see corn when you don't realize what

corn

> is.
> > I'm just here to magnify how dumb you are. But your wife....now
> there's
> > a good one. I never knew anything about he until you posted how
it was HER that dragged YOU into playing vp,
>
> Never said that. As usual you can't get even the smallest little
> detail correct.

Have I mentioned that you are dicky the denyer lately??

Still babbling after all these years ...

>
> > thereby doing what all
> > pathological liars and gamblers cannot help but do--blame

others

> for their problems. Thus dicky the denyer. So I figured, if you
showed no respect for her, then why should I? Get the picture, or

do

I need to explain it numerically?
>
> Still no original thoughts?

Don't need any when I'm on-a-roll with the truth. It's like

spanking

you with BOTH hands!

I see you're as confused as ever.

This makes it 3 in a row since I
> challenged you to do a single new and creative post. By the way,
the word is spelled D E N I E R. If your going to use it all the

time

at least get it right. LMAO.

Nope--look back at the first time I labeled you and you'll see it's
spelled correctly. I changed it to correspond to the 'y' in dicky.

Sure you did. By the way, most people spell it Dickie. I'm not
surprised that you'd get it wrong as you pretty much get everything
wrong. Especially your progressive system. Did I tell you I tried
another simulation to see just how many could achieve a 88% session
win success rate after 250 sessions? It turns out you've been in the
top 2%. So, what do you do with this luck. You use it to rope others
into using a flawed approach with a 98% chance of doing worse than
you and a 65-85% chance of failure depending on which negative games
they play. More evidence that you are a very little man.

It
just didn't look as belittling with the 'i'.

No, but it makes you look real stupid which is why I let you use it
for this long before correcting you.

#13

> just didn't look as belittling with the 'i'.

No, but it makes you look real stupid which is why I let you use it
for this long before correcting you.

You guys are all but saying it. How about you both
meet at Caeser's, plot 'em on the bar measure up
and declare a winner? It would save a lot of typing.

#14

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "worldbefree22001"
<krajewski.sa@p...> wrote:

> > just didn't look as belittling with the 'i'.
>
> No, but it makes you look real stupid which is why I let you use

it

> for this long before correcting you.
>

You guys are all but saying it. How about you both
meet at Caeser's, plot 'em on the bar measure up
and declare a winner? It would save a lot of typing.

That was supposed to be plop them.

#15

Sure you did. By the way, most people spell it Dickie.

I'm not 'most people' and I'd never sign up to be someone who belongs
to your clan of corn.

I'm not

surprised that you'd get it wrong as you pretty much get everything
wrong. Especially your progressive system. Did I tell you I tried
another simulation to see just how many could achieve a 88% session
win success rate after 250 sessions? It turns out you've been in

the top 2%. So, what do you do with this luck. You use it to rope
others into using a flawed approach with a 98% chance of doing worse
than you and a 65-85% chance of failure depending on which negative
games they play. More evidence that you are a very little man.

You're still scratching the itch that won't go away....
You think you're stupid simulations reflect how I play in any way,
shape or form? You're SO corny. Are you sure the air at Sam's
beautiful Town hasn't affected you more than usual??

> It
> just didn't look as belittling with the 'i'.

No, but it makes you look real stupid which is why I let you use it
for this long before correcting you.

Take a look: dicky the denyer....or dickie the denier. Which seems
more like you? End of story.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#16

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "worldbefree22001"
<krajewski.sa@p...> wrote:

> > just didn't look as belittling with the 'i'.
>
> No, but it makes you look real stupid which is why I let you use it
> for this long before correcting you.
>

You guys are all but saying it. How about you both
meet at Caeser's, plot 'em on the bar measure up
and declare a winner? It would save a lot of typing.

Dicky the denyer doesn't drink. He can't afford both vices.

···
#17

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "worldbefree22001"
<krajewski.sa@p...> wrote:

That was supposed to be plop them.

Good thing you caught that before the denyer did. After getting
thrashed around by the machines daily, he has a raging need to find
something to correct. It helps him make believe he won something.

#18

Not really. The simulations will play much better than you could ever
play. As such, they provide a best result. The reality is real people
will probably do much worse which makes it even more unlikely for
anyone to have success with your system. That's why you are such a
little man.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...> wrote:

You think you're stupid simulations reflect how I play in any way,
shape or form?

#19

I never said that. You can't get anything right, can you? I never drink
WHEN I GAMBLE. Otherwise I will have a drink now and then. And, I am
not a alcoholic like little man Robbie.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...> wrote:

Dicky the denyer doesn't drink. He can't afford both vices.

#20

Plop.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "worldbefree22001"
<krajewski.sa@p...> wrote:

> That was supposed to be plop them.

Good thing you caught that before the denyer did. After getting
thrashed around by the machines daily, he has a raging need to find
something to correct. It helps him make believe he won something.