> > I don't need the internet. I attended the first international
> > conference on neural networks (In Boston). Also, if you knew
> anything at all about evolution you'd realize that if there were
any unused brain cells they would exist only for an outdated
function of the brain (just like in every other evolutionary
situation).
>
> I attended Cathay Pacific's First Class flights to & from Hong
Kong for 10 years, and the Harvard Med. Journal is their top read. I
know that in nerdy rooms like the one you were stuck in at IBM the
most popular read was Geeks-R-US. And wanna know how I'm aware you're
> making all that baloney up? You can't remember what you wrote 3
days ago, and you're claiming to remember something from 50 years
ago? HA!
OK. If it's internet verification you want, start here.
http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/tenper.html
Or, you could have used google like I just did and found several
references that backs up my FACTUAL account. So, what did you do
instead? You told ANOTHER lie to try and impress God knows who. You
are pathetic.
Leave it to you to find a quack's alternate opinion to fact stated in
the world's most recognized and respected journal! That stupid piece
is the same as reading Michael Moore's website opinions on why he's
anti-American. This certainly adds credibility to the addage that it
takes a critic to believe a critic. How in the world do you come up
with such stuff?...or rather--why? All you do is show your ignorance
and put it on display.
I don't need proof and I don't care what BS you post here. It's all
obvious lies. Just like the one you told about the medical journal.
You can't keep saying idiotic baloney and actually believe anyone
would think you're educated? In schools or otherwise.
Oh, so you prefer to call it all lies with the utmost conviction, and
as an addicted gambler, you're not willing to "take" $5000 from me
when I 'cannot' provide the proof you 'know' I don't have because
it's all 'BS'. Hmmmm..... Do you know what that makes you look like?
Let me help you--a BIG phoney who writes words for the purpose of
creating comfort where there really is none, and who hasn't the self-
confidence to live out his creation for real.
> But one addition: You must, after seeing my
> info, show yours, and I will do an article comparing the
> education/lifetime experiences of you--a critic--vs. me--a
> professional from the start.
I wonder what goes on that brain of your that thinks for a single
instant that I care what you print.
HAHAHA! Just look at your attention here!! You're such a fool, and
VERY simple to control. All your words of how you "like to set the
record straight" get completely annulled by the continual antics I
catch you performing, as above, time after time.
> Well gee, if I stole it from the plane like you would have if you
> ever flew anywhere, I'd whip it out right now for you. Duh.
No, you never saw it and now you know that facts can't be dismissed
by fools.
Stick with the inference. If you ever flew anywhere - which you
obviously haven't - would YOU copy down all the numbers of articles
read and be able to whip them out when a nerd asked for that stat 10
years later? OK, Ok....I just fell over from laughter!!!!
> Translation---IN CAPITAL LETTERS--You're afraid. Plain & simple.
> Excuse after excuse.
Oh, and bring that journal article with you to the tennis
courts ... as if you'd ever show up ... LMAO.
All you gots to do little dicky is incorporate the date & time right
here. That all you gots to do! I swear. Then you appear on the live
broadcast and I'll follow up that whooping with a 4-set match
spanking of a cripple.
> You show your weakness over and over when you can't answer. And
if you wanted to state a fact instead of a generality you'd have
looked up the number of members on vpFREE and said it. Pretty tough
when you're spoon-fed a taste of your own medicine!!
No fact? I didn't think so, maybe next year.
So where is it? Very surprising that a geek wouldn't be checking
every possible stat to throw out. Oh, I get it! I caught you so
you're feeling better in your introverted little world that exists
behind the computer only, by making up that you don't need to supply
the most important fact of your bumbling statement.
> > > You do nothing but give lip service about winning and
winners. You wouldn't have made the stupid move to be closer to the
machines if you weren't an overall loser chasing the losses.
> >
> > If I ever heard a more ILLOGICAL statement than this I don't no
> where it could have been. Does your mind really work this way or
do you have to turn green first.
>
> Zzzziiinng! Right to the heart of the matter once again!! Gee I'm
> good!!! You always get torn apart by my revealing what you deny
the very most---your reason for moving, i.e., being roped in---to the
> crap city of LV. And the underlying reason why? HA! Pure RGM
misery. And you both cock that pistol every day as you roam
aimlessly from locals dump to locals dump.
By the way, did I mention the 80% appreciation on my investment in
less than two years? "Zzzziiinng!"
Don't be too excited. It's gone up far more than that over here, and
my property in Hawaii's been doing that for years. But it won't
continue in LV, and actually, you'll see it dive soon enough. That's
what happens to addicts you know. They always get stung. As soon as
the imminent terror attack occurs in a STRIP casino (because of
extremely lax security against suicide bombers, etc.), few will visit
the city for a long, long time. Sure, all the local addicts will
continue to get their fixes at the locals dumps because they'll make
believe they're 'safe' there, but their cash cow will quickly
disintegrate almost overnight. You know that 'line of equity' that
almost every Las Vegan has been tapping into to keep on gambling (of
course you do)? As soon as the visitors stop coming, the city will be
one depressed hole, and the economy over there will rot away faster
than Paris Hilton taking her panties off at a lesbian convention.
Zzziiiinng!
> > 2) They figured out it isn't worth the effort for them.
>
> You mean they never had the addiction to do something so utterly
> foolish.
No, I mean what I said.
You mean you NEED what you said to true....again.
>
> > 3) They already have jobs that pays better.
>
> Illogical. Math geeks don't make that much money to begin with.
And with your assertions about the game, it's easy pickins to make a
ton more at the higher levels.
I never said it was easy pickens. I've said all along that the edge
is small and the true APer must do a lot more than practice JOB to
make money. Too bad you couldn't figure this out when you started
or you might not have lost that inheritance.
"AP" is a state of mind, and whenever you write about how it's soooo
hard to be one, you do so to impress yourself. Probably at the same
time your waggin' ya dick in ya hand.
> > 4) Insufficient bankroll.
>
> You mean they put more importance and respect into their family
than they do in their selfish, pathological reasonings for shoving
off to an addict town filled with the highest rates of social
degeneration.
No, I mean what I said.
Ever hear of dicky the denyer?
> >
> > Last but not least there are not all that many folks around
that
> have the math ability.
>
> I'll correct you there. Engineering schools graduate tens of
> thousands every year, and these are the people who design our
> techinical futures. You saying they don't qualify because there's
> geeks like you running around thinking they are in the top 90% of
> intelligence? Maybe that's why you're so confused about
everything else.
Let's see 10,000*25 years out of ~300,000,000. Doesn't sound like
very many to me.
So that's supposed to mean there's more geeky people running around
than these folks. No wonder you're so full of yourself.
But I see you skipped over the salient points where
they can make a lot more money using their educations than gambling.
That's inaccurate. Some can, some can't.
That's exactly what I did. I could still make more money in
technical pursuits than I could ever make gambling if that's what I
wanted to do.
That's because you lose too much, and you don't have the $$$ to play
to the level in your make-believe world.
> I'll help you off that horse before it throws you. When I was on
my
> first job and in Wash. DC, at 26 I had several run-ins with an
agent
> of 19 years service. One day he couldn't take my badgering any
longer
> and I'd had enough of his condescending attitude just because I
> was 'so inexperienced'. He jumped me, and I would've been
clobbered
> unexpectedly had it not been for the fact that he got his belt
loop
> caught on a fire extinguisher and it pulled his pants down to his
> knees as he continued lunging at me. Everyone laughed, I didn't
file
> a complaint, and nothing was proven either way except what a fool
> he'd been. You're something like him. You make believe you can
play
> tennis on a bad knee, I think everyone who's seen and knows me
knows
> I'm in excellent shape, I try to play 3 times a week---and just
so
> you can cloud the issue of meeting with me at the radio station,
you
> keep on about this tennis. I have nothing to gain by beating an
old out-of-shape geek whose pants would fall down if it's not
attached
to his man-girdle. You do the radio stint and I'll make a fool of
you
on
> the courts.
First, the incessant babble and then, just as I predicted, Rob's
starting to back out. I thought you'd wait a little longer before
putting that tail between your legs and heading for the nearest
exit.
You figure and then explain what I have to gain by beating up on a 60-
year-old cripple, and I'll remove the condition that you have to
appear on the radio show with me. Simple as that. You rub my back
I'll rub yours. (One of your 'Americana' cultural expressions!).
Otherwise, you well know what that means. First you head for the
hills (more 'Americana') when it comes time to back your 'lie'
assertions up with having to face the proof--when, as you continually
so bravely toot when there's no risk--that there's NO possible way
you could lose. Now all you have to do is be on the radio show with
me and debate, i.e., back up your assertions that you're such a
STRONG debater, and I'll be on the courts with you afterwards. Of
course, you forgot that I presented the radio opportunity first. I
woder why....... Have I EVER run into such an introverted coward in
my life?
···
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
