rgmustain <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
>>>Maybe you should learn to read a little better. I've never said
anything like that. I understand that anyone can be lucky. However,
anyone who falls for a system because the system was successful for a
few people is, quite simply, a sucker. Some basic reading on
statistics would do you wonders.
Your tirade made you miss the entire point of what I said. Who
cares how his system of play affects others at this point in time?
What point in time. Maybe you should read your own posts first.
That's not the issue. Take a closer look, read it this time, and
don't get so ruffled over it.
Still reads the same to me.
I never saw any proof that RS is a liar OR a fraud aside from your
ongoing vitriol about how it's not possible for him to win using
negative games.
There's a reading comprehension problem, again. Look more closely and
you will see my point is that IN GENERAL people will lose with his
system. How many times did I state that "I didn't care if he won or
lost"??? I must have made that same statement close to 100 times.
Strange how you ignore the facts just like Rob …
He in fact seems very capable of proving he did win what he said he
did. The point you sped by was that now you have the chance to
actually prove him wrong, unless you either accept the fact that he
won, you don't really have the money you bark that you say you do, or
you're just plain afraid to face him.
Let me say it again. I don't care if RS wins or loses or breaks even.
The point is he promotes a system that will lead others to lose while
denigrating mathematically proven advantage play.
You keep on saying his system has no validity, yet you seem
comfortable being critical from the safety of your computer and will
not walk the walk after you've talked the talk for so long. He says
he wins playing his way; you say he cannot.
Wrong again. Aynone can win with any system. It's called luck.
However, when you use that luck factor to promote yourself and your
system then you are a liar and a fraud. I believe a woman from PA
recently won a second million dollar lottery. If she claimed she
used "a system" and it was the reason she won the lottery then that
would be equivalent to what RS does.
Unless of course you take the chicken little approach when facing
the possibility of a big bet, and give us "it's possible but not
probable". That kind of attitude is for babies.
Of course it's possible. What part of LUCK don't you understand???
Now, if you can show me how his luck is useful to anyone else please
feel free to add something of merit.
I re-read the whole exchange, and you surely did want a bet with
him, only it appears it was YOU who backed down when he was requiring
cash be made available and you just wanted to view Internet sites.
His initial CHALLENGE was that I did NOT have the money. Pure and
simple. I was more than willing to show him that I had the money. At
that point he got cowardly and started to try and CHANGE his initial
challenge. I never backed down, he did as soon as he started making
changes.
If that's the case, I can say I have more than both of you put
together, but you can't prove it so it's totally meaningless.
I could prove it. That's the point. By the way, this is the 21st
century. There's this thing called the internet that lets you sign on
to financial accounts. I was willing to allow RS to sit next to me
while I signed on to show him exactly what I had. All he wanted was
for me to go through the effort to convert my assets in cash and then
he would have backed down anyway.
Maybe in your mind you believe you made a fool of Singer, but when
I was in LV a few weeks ago I picked up a Gaming Today and his
article had a piece about you, and he made a fool of you to the whole
world.
He can write whatever he wants in GT. I could care less. Anyone who
reads his garbage and believes it is a sucker by definition. You
think I care what these suckers think? Get a life.
If I remember correctly, there was a lot about a poster
named "Dick" who was critical as stated above, but the best part was
how this "Dick" claimed not to be addicted to the game, yet he
claimed to have hit 26 royals in a recent 6-month period. Ouch!
Yes, 26 RFs is true. I'm glad to see RS continues to read my posts
with baited breath, since that particular statement was not made in
our discussions. PS. I'm still not addicted. You should go back and
reread my post on addiction if you want to really understand.
However, I'll give you the short form. I'm as addicted to VP as
someone who works for a living and puts in his hours every week.
Now I see why you despise Singer so much. He seems to have your
number and you can't get it back. But here's your chance to step up
and take it back. Cover his bet. How else are you going to save
face?
Come on, Rob, get out from behind your assumed ID and face me again.
The only thing I have against you is claiming that people, in
general, can win long term on negative expectation machines. Many
have proven it can't be done. I've proven that it can't be done, but
you persist in claiming otherwise. Oh, and for the record ONE MORE
TIME. I could care less whether you've personally won or lost.
Dick
···
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Aces High <aces_hii@y...> wrote: