vpFREE2 Forums

SIN CITY and OLD BIDDIES

Of all the crap that Jean Scot writes, her latest campaign
against "indecent" Hardrock Casino ads is the most ridiculous. Her
LVA column from a few weeks ago on "sex in the city" apparently
elicited a number of "blue hair" emails in support of the Queen.
Here's a sampling of some of the responses she received that were
published in her latest Frugal Friday ramblings:

I'm not a prude, far from it, but the type of advertising we're
getting these days is just not acceptable. I know in the long run it
will cost the valley. Already a young couple I know, who are talking
about starting a family, have openly stated that they will be leaving
when the first baby comes. Why? Because they don't want to explain to
the kid what that sign on the taxi is all about -- you know, the one
with the almost bare butts.

REX RASTIS RESPONSE- WHY WAIT FOR THE KID TO BE BORN? GET THE LUCK
OUT ASAP. THERE ARE WAY TOO MANY RESIDENTS IN THE VALLEY DRINKING
THE WATER AND DRIVING UP THE COST OF HOUSING. RR WANTS TO MOVE TO
VEGAS WHEN HE RETIRES AND LIKES TO WASH DOWN HIS BOURBON WITH WATER.
RR IS APPALLED THAT THOSE TAXI CABS SHOW ALMOST BARE BUTTS. RR WOULD
PREFER TO SEE THE WHOLE AZZ. WHY COVER ANY OF IT? LAS VEGAS IS SIN
CITY AND THE ECONOMY THRIVES ON SIN, NOT DEPENDS.

Sex is wonderful; sex is great. Obviously sex sells. But I'm always
hoping for just a little bit more imagination. The old Vegas was more
of an illusion.

RR SAYS. WHAT ABOUT THOSE LONG LEGGED GURLS FROM PARIS WHO HAVE BEEN
SHOWING THEIR (+)(+)'s SINCE JEAN WAS TOO YOUNG TO BE A MEMBER OF THE
AARP? LAS VEGAS HAS NEVER BEEN SUBTLE ABOUT ANYTHING.

I would like to add one more negative about the new sex theme going
on in Vegas. I'm usually out early in the morning (around 5:30 am)
and when I stop at the Barbary Coast, I'm absolutely scared for my
life on weekends. And I'm not a small man. At this time, the 21- to
30-year-olds are coming from Drai's and the all-night drinking and
drugging parties that go on there. I swear, one wrong word or funny
look toward some of the people could cause all kinds of trouble. I
believe that, in the future, we will hear of many rooms trashed,
people injured, employees attacked, and numerous other problems
caused by too much alcohol and drugs. It will become a very dangerous
city to live in.

RR SAYS; SINCE YOU ARE SUCH A DO GOODER COULD YOU HELP ME OUT NEXT
WEEKEND? MY DAUGHTER JUST TURNED 21. RR IS GOING TO DROP HER OFF AT
DRAI'S AROUND MIDNIGHT. COULD YOU PICK HER UP AT 5:30AM AND HAUL HER
WILD AZZ OVER TO THE RIO. RASTIS WILL BE AT THE HARDROCK LOOKING FOR
THE CHIC ON THE BACK OF THAT TAXI.

I fully agree that the referenced billboard, and similar material,
are quite offensive. I also agree with the distinction you drew
between the billboards and the Zumanity show. Even so, it appears to
me that the Hard Rock does have a First Amendment right to display
such material. As long as it's merely offensive, as opposed to
fraudulent, I can't see how it fits into any of the recognized
exceptions to the First Amendment. If you do see fit to mention the
issue again, you might want to comment upon exactly why you feel that
such displays should be legally prohibited. Unless everybody's rights
are respected, nobody's are truly secure.

Jean's note: This is not a First Amendment issue. The Nevada Gaming
Commission has the power to judge the actions of the casinos they
regulate and to decide whether anything they do (including moral as
well as legal issues) will be a negative for the reputation of the
Nevada gaming industry. The casinos know this and agree to this as a
condition for getting their valuable gaming licenses.

RR SAYS, LOL. NEGATIVE FOR THE REPUTATION OF NEVADA??? ROTFLOL!
GET A GRIP SISTER! EVEN THE MORMONS KNOW THE ONLY REASON THE
MILLIONS OF TOURISTS COME TO TOWN AND LEAVE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IS
BECAUSE OF THE REPUTATION OF LAS VEGAS AS SIN CITY. TAKE YOUR AZZ ON
OVER TO SALT LAKE CITY AND PEDDLE THAT BULL CHIT. YOU REALLY ARE OUT
OF YOUR FRICKING MIND. QUESTION OF THE DAY? CAN A PERSON HAVE
ALTHIMIERS AND STILL PLAY MISTAKE FREE VIDEO POKER?

Jean's conclusion: I think I'll let Dr. Seuss have the last word on
this subject:
"You have brains in your head. You have feet in your shoes.
You can steer yourself any direction you choose.
You're on your own. And you know what you know.
And you are the one who'll decide where to go."

RR CONCLUSION: ME THINKS MAYOR GOODMAN SHOULD HAVE THE LAST WORD ON
THE SUBJECT:

Mayor Oscar Goodman isn't apologizing for the risqué message of the
city's slogan, "What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas." "Anybody who
wouldn't come to Vegas because they don't like the slogan, I don't
want them here," Goodman is quoted as saying in a Boston Globe
article written by local freelancer Steve Friess. "It's not a place
for little old biddies."

Jean Scott wrote:

"I'm not a prude, far from it, but the type of advertising we're
getting these days is just not acceptable. I know in the long run

it will cost the valley. Already a young couple I know, who are
talking about starting a family, have openly stated that they will be
leaving when the first baby comes".

Now the truth: What's any of this got to do with a weekly 'Frugal
Gambler' column? Now I hope everyone can see why she isn't able to
write for Gaming Today. I'd like to see some...or just ONE...of her
statictics that support the statement "I know in the long run it will
cost the valley". It's just more of that nebulous long-term BS she
uses when she talks about video poker. It's unsupportable,
unproveable, and can easily be masked over enough so that weak
personalities will praise her for her 'knowledge' on the subject. And
if "the type of advertising we're getting these days is just not
acceptable" -- almost everyone with the exceptional wealth she claims
to have accumulated playing video poker, who feels THAT strongly
about anything, would simply pack up and leave. Why not? Could YOU
just walk away from a life-controlling habit?

I think you Jean Scott haters need to look up the word animosity and
then get some therapy.

Jean Scott wrote:
> "I'm not a prude, far from it, but the type of advertising we're
> getting these days is just not acceptable. I know in the long

run

it will cost the valley. Already a young couple I know, who are
talking about starting a family, have openly stated that they will

be

leaving when the first baby comes".

Now the truth: What's any of this got to do with a weekly 'Frugal
Gambler' column? Now I hope everyone can see why she isn't able to
write for Gaming Today. I'd like to see some...or just ONE...of

her

statictics that support the statement "I know in the long run it

will

cost the valley". It's just more of that nebulous long-term BS she
uses when she talks about video poker. It's unsupportable,
unproveable, and can easily be masked over enough so that weak
personalities will praise her for her 'knowledge' on the subject.

And

if "the type of advertising we're getting these days is just not
acceptable" -- almost everyone with the exceptional wealth she

claims

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

to have accumulated playing video poker, who feels THAT strongly
about anything, would simply pack up and leave. Why not? Could YOU
just walk away from a life-controlling habit?

Rastis does not hate Jean Scott, or Gene Scott for that matter. One has to admire their ability to make money from the moron masses. However, Rastis does not think either one of them is the second coming of Jesus Christ and he disagrees with both of them on most matters. In fact both bring joy to Rastis as they offer some of the best entertainment around. Rastis loves to laugh.

···

----- Original Message -----
  From: hansjurgent
  To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 11:36 AM
  Subject: [FREEvpFREE] Re: SIN CITY and OLD BIDDIES

  I think you Jean Scott haters need to look up the word animosity and
  then get some therapy.

  --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
  > Jean Scott wrote:
  > > "I'm not a prude, far from it, but the type of advertising we're
  > > getting these days is just not acceptable. I know in the long
  run
  > it will cost the valley. Already a young couple I know, who are
  > talking about starting a family, have openly stated that they will
  be
  > leaving when the first baby comes".
  >
  > Now the truth: What's any of this got to do with a weekly 'Frugal
  > Gambler' column? Now I hope everyone can see why she isn't able to
  > write for Gaming Today. I'd like to see some...or just ONE...of
  her
  > statictics that support the statement "I know in the long run it
  will
  > cost the valley". It's just more of that nebulous long-term BS she
  > uses when she talks about video poker. It's unsupportable,
  > unproveable, and can easily be masked over enough so that weak
  > personalities will praise her for her 'knowledge' on the subject.
  And
  > if "the type of advertising we're getting these days is just not
  > acceptable" -- almost everyone with the exceptional wealth she
  claims
  > to have accumulated playing video poker, who feels THAT strongly
  > about anything, would simply pack up and leave. Why not? Could YOU
  > just walk away from a life-controlling habit?

  vpFREE Links: http://tinyurl.com/v9qq

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Yahoo! Groups Links

    a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/
      
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    FREEvpFREE-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Rastis hates the sin but loves the sinner. Or is it love the sin but hate the sinner? OH well....

···

----- Original Message -----
  From: deadin7
  To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 8:15 PM
  Subject: [FREEvpFREE] Re: SIN CITY and OLD BIDDIES

  Jean Scott wrote:
  > "I'm not a prude, far from it, but the type of advertising we're
  > getting these days is just not acceptable. I know in the long run
  it will cost the valley. Already a young couple I know, who are
  talking about starting a family, have openly stated that they will be
  leaving when the first baby comes".

  Now the truth: What's any of this got to do with a weekly 'Frugal
  Gambler' column? Now I hope everyone can see why she isn't able to
  write for Gaming Today. I'd like to see some...or just ONE...of her
  statictics that support the statement "I know in the long run it will
  cost the valley". It's just more of that nebulous long-term BS she
  uses when she talks about video poker. It's unsupportable,
  unproveable, and can easily be masked over enough so that weak
  personalities will praise her for her 'knowledge' on the subject. And
  if "the type of advertising we're getting these days is just not
  acceptable" -- almost everyone with the exceptional wealth she claims
  to have accumulated playing video poker, who feels THAT strongly
  about anything, would simply pack up and leave. Why not? Could YOU
  just walk away from a life-controlling habit?

  vpFREE Links: http://tinyurl.com/v9qq

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Yahoo! Groups Links

    a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/
      
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    FREEvpFREE-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

You and your Jean Scott hater friends need to stop alleging that she
has a gambling problem. Gamblers already have a bad reputation in
this world without fellow gamblers calling each other addicts. Your
inuenndos hurt the reputation of educated gamblers everywhere
including yourself.

You're doing a diservice to the video poker hobby. If you had any
dignity you would publicly appologize.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Rasti$ P. Rulz" <vpvegas@c...>
wrote:

Rastis hates the sin but loves the sinner. Or is it love the sin

but hate the sinner? OH well....

  From: deadin7
  To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 8:15 PM
  Subject: [FREEvpFREE] Re: SIN CITY and OLD BIDDIES

  Jean Scott wrote:
  > "I'm not a prude, far from it, but the type of advertising

we're

  > getting these days is just not acceptable. I know in the long

run

  it will cost the valley. Already a young couple I know, who are
  talking about starting a family, have openly stated that they

will be

  leaving when the first baby comes".

  Now the truth: What's any of this got to do with a weekly 'Frugal
  Gambler' column? Now I hope everyone can see why she isn't able

to

  write for Gaming Today. I'd like to see some...or just ONE...of

her

  statictics that support the statement "I know in the long run it

will

  cost the valley". It's just more of that nebulous long-term BS

she

  uses when she talks about video poker. It's unsupportable,
  unproveable, and can easily be masked over enough so that weak
  personalities will praise her for her 'knowledge' on the subject.

And

  if "the type of advertising we're getting these days is just not
  acceptable" -- almost everyone with the exceptional wealth she

claims

  to have accumulated playing video poker, who feels THAT strongly
  about anything, would simply pack up and leave. Why not? Could

YOU

···

  ----- Original Message -----
  just walk away from a life-controlling habit?

  vpFREE Links: http://tinyurl.com/v9qq

--------------------------------------------------------------------

----------

  Yahoo! Groups Links

    a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/
      
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    FREEvpFREE-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of

Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

'Jean Scott' & 'gambling problem' used in the same sentence? Well,
name one other so-called self-proclaimed "frugal" person you've ever
heard of or read about who believes in getting the best & cheapest
deals out of every aspect of life, that bangs away for hours and
hours, day after day, on the $2 & $5 games and the dollar/$2 multi-
plays whether there's a promotion or not. This is a public figure
whom others believe has control over what she does and is as frugal
in her gambling habits as she claims to be in life. They look up to
her as some sort of icon, yet what they see ain't what they get. I'd
say most gamblers already really AREN'T as hooked as she is, and they
tell me they thank their lucky stars every day.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "hansjurgent" <hansjurgent16@h...>
wrote:

You and your Jean Scott hater friends need to stop alleging that

she

has a gambling problem. Gamblers already have a bad reputation in
this world without fellow gamblers calling each other addicts.

Your

inuenndos hurt the reputation of educated gamblers everywhere
including yourself.

You're doing a diservice to the video poker hobby. If you had any
dignity you would publicly appologize.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Rasti$ P. Rulz" <vpvegas@c...>
wrote:
> Rastis hates the sin but loves the sinner. Or is it love the sin
but hate the sinner? OH well....
> From: deadin7
> To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 8:15 PM
> Subject: [FREEvpFREE] Re: SIN CITY and OLD BIDDIES
>
>
> Jean Scott wrote:
> > "I'm not a prude, far from it, but the type of advertising
we're
> > getting these days is just not acceptable. I know in the long
run
> it will cost the valley. Already a young couple I know, who are
> talking about starting a family, have openly stated that they
will be
> leaving when the first baby comes".
>
> Now the truth: What's any of this got to do with a

weekly 'Frugal

> Gambler' column? Now I hope everyone can see why she isn't able
to
> write for Gaming Today. I'd like to see some...or just ONE...of
her
> statictics that support the statement "I know in the long run

it

will
> cost the valley". It's just more of that nebulous long-term BS
she
> uses when she talks about video poker. It's unsupportable,
> unproveable, and can easily be masked over enough so that weak
> personalities will praise her for her 'knowledge' on the

subject.

And
> if "the type of advertising we're getting these days is just

not

> acceptable" -- almost everyone with the exceptional wealth she
claims
> to have accumulated playing video poker, who feels THAT

strongly

···

> ----- Original Message -----
> about anything, would simply pack up and leave. Why not? Could
YOU
> just walk away from a life-controlling habit?
>
>
>
> vpFREE Links: http://tinyurl.com/v9qq
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------

--

----------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> FREEvpFREE-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms

of

Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

So she likes to gamble, don't we all (who are reading this)?

Stop with these addict comments! It just perpetuates the stigma
associated with gambling.

I would think if she was a guru she would be at most casino
promotions.

She is not the "high roller gambler" but the "frugal gambler."

Jealousy is so unbecoming.

'Jean Scott' & 'gambling problem' used in the same sentence? Well,
name one other so-called self-proclaimed "frugal" person you've

ever

heard of or read about who believes in getting the best & cheapest
deals out of every aspect of life, that bangs away for hours and
hours, day after day, on the $2 & $5 games and the dollar/$2 multi-
plays whether there's a promotion or not. This is a public figure
whom others believe has control over what she does and is as frugal
in her gambling habits as she claims to be in life. They look up to
her as some sort of icon, yet what they see ain't what they get.

I'd

say most gamblers already really AREN'T as hooked as she is, and

they

tell me they thank their lucky stars every day.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "hansjurgent"

<hansjurgent16@h...>

wrote:
> You and your Jean Scott hater friends need to stop alleging that
she
> has a gambling problem. Gamblers already have a bad reputation

in

> this world without fellow gamblers calling each other addicts.
Your
> inuenndos hurt the reputation of educated gamblers everywhere
> including yourself.
>
> You're doing a diservice to the video poker hobby. If you had

any

> dignity you would publicly appologize.
>
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Rasti$ P. Rulz"

<vpvegas@c...>

> wrote:
> > Rastis hates the sin but loves the sinner. Or is it love the

sin

> but hate the sinner? OH well....
> > From: deadin7
> > To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 8:15 PM
> > Subject: [FREEvpFREE] Re: SIN CITY and OLD BIDDIES
> >
> >
> > Jean Scott wrote:
> > > "I'm not a prude, far from it, but the type of advertising
> we're
> > > getting these days is just not acceptable. I know in the

long

> run
> > it will cost the valley. Already a young couple I know, who

are

> > talking about starting a family, have openly stated that they
> will be
> > leaving when the first baby comes".
> >
> > Now the truth: What's any of this got to do with a
weekly 'Frugal
> > Gambler' column? Now I hope everyone can see why she isn't

able

> to
> > write for Gaming Today. I'd like to see some...or just

ONE...of

> her
> > statictics that support the statement "I know in the long run
it
> will
> > cost the valley". It's just more of that nebulous long-term

BS

> she
> > uses when she talks about video poker. It's unsupportable,
> > unproveable, and can easily be masked over enough so that

weak

> > personalities will praise her for her 'knowledge' on the
subject.
> And
> > if "the type of advertising we're getting these days is just
not
> > acceptable" -- almost everyone with the exceptional wealth

she

> claims
> > to have accumulated playing video poker, who feels THAT
strongly
> > about anything, would simply pack up and leave. Why not?

Could

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

> > ----- Original Message -----
> YOU
> > just walk away from a life-controlling habit?
> >
> >
> >
> > vpFREE Links: http://tinyurl.com/v9qq
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------

--

--
> ----------
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/
> >
> > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > FREEvpFREE-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!

Terms

of
> Service.
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I don't think you get it. Since when does someone who claims to be so
frugal--and who really has a bunch of lower-level players that
idolize her--blab so often about playing on the machines I
mentioned? "Frugal" gamblers do not play higher than quarters, and
most of them can't even afford THAT. Anyone who buys into her vp show
whenever she toots her horn about all that casino junk and pile of
comps/gift certificates she gets "for free" SHOULD be intelligent
enough to realize that it takes several hundred thousands of dollars
run through the machines every month to keep that nonsense up. And
that spells a-d-d-i-c-t-i-o-n. It also spells "I paid $650 for
my 'free' lunch buffet I got with my points". That is NOT what public
figures should be teaching people.

RS

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "hansjurgent" <hansjurgent16@h...>
wrote:

···

So she likes to gamble, don't we all (who are reading this)?

Stop with these addict comments! It just perpetuates the stigma
associated with gambling.

I would think if she was a guru she would be at most casino
promotions.

She is not the "high roller gambler" but the "frugal gambler."

Jealousy is so unbecoming.

Here's an example of just one of many, many e-mails I receive every
week. And the gurus think they're going to last with the long-
term/optimal-play nonsense? If they think people are so blind as to
not be able to see through their sales pitch/'buy my products first &
foremost' schemes--which is ALL they're really interested in when it
comes to others--read this e-mail several times. I've got a whole
file packed with similar messages, and they keep on coming. That is
why I've chosen the title "The New Era In Video Poker Is Here" for
the third and final book in my Undeniable Truth series. Bob Dancer
can keep on running around the country to gaming locations, where the
only reason he goes is because he gets paid to teach a strategy that
is very profitable to whatever casino hires him to do so--and I see
nothing wrong with the guy trying to earn a living however possible.
But he's a fading star, his popularity is now mainly with the casinos
(i.e., the OTHER side of the fence), and it's clear players want much
more when it comes to the "how-to" aspect of the game. I give them
that.

RS

···

----- Original Message -----
From: Fa
To: rsinger1111@cox.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: Refreshing News

Rob;
you're a savior!!!! You're awsome. Really down to Earth! My wife
thanks you too!!! I've been driving her crazy! I'll do it your way
from now on.
I went to see Bob Dancer at the Borgata in AC. You're right. He and
his wife Shirley had a table set up with all sorts of stuff to sell.
He told the audience he had lost $10,00.00 the night before in LV.
For someone like me who is on fixed income and starting out, VP
didn't sound too cool. That is, until you came along.
Next time when I go back to AC I'm going to take a Post-It note with
me and stick on the machine with this message on it: Remember, Do It
Rob's Way! Thank you, Sir!
George

I think your jealous of her success and her comps. What a bitter
old man you have become.

You can get quite a few comps with low level gambling. I barely
take $500 to Vegas and I get free buffets and free rooms by using
her system and strategy. I used to play slots and lose $100 in a
half hour and now I play video poker and play for hours.

Thanks for contributing to the stigma that gambling is a low life
vice lower than drinking alcohol, smoking or overeating which kills
more people and wastes more taxpayer money than gambling. I
appreciate it.

You've become jealous of a retired school teacher what a sad man you
are.

I don't think you get it. Since when does someone who claims to be

so

frugal--and who really has a bunch of lower-level players that
idolize her--blab so often about playing on the machines I
mentioned? "Frugal" gamblers do not play higher than quarters, and
most of them can't even afford THAT. Anyone who buys into her vp

show

whenever she toots her horn about all that casino junk and pile of
comps/gift certificates she gets "for free" SHOULD be intelligent
enough to realize that it takes several hundred thousands of

dollars

run through the machines every month to keep that nonsense up. And
that spells a-d-d-i-c-t-i-o-n. It also spells "I paid $650 for
my 'free' lunch buffet I got with my points". That is NOT what

public

figures should be teaching people.

RS

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "hansjurgent"

<hansjurgent16@h...>

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

wrote:
> So she likes to gamble, don't we all (who are reading this)?
>
> Stop with these addict comments! It just perpetuates the stigma
> associated with gambling.
>
> I would think if she was a guru she would be at most casino
> promotions.
>
> She is not the "high roller gambler" but the "frugal gambler."
>
> Jealousy is so unbecoming.

You still don't get it. The comps you're talking about and the ones
she blabs about all the time are two different animals. And I
actually do far better than her with a lot less play at all
levels....and I win.

One point you didn't miss, however, is that video poker is a low-
class vice. Look around at any mostly locals casino at all the
regular vp players on your next visit. What do you see? Right--the
MAJORITY are some of the lowest of life's leftovers....people who
consume far too much alcohol, most are chain smokers, and many who
take pbesity to the highest level. Self-respect is NOT is most video
poker player's vocabulary. Your lady hero would just as soon sell her
products to anyone of these pathetic people, while I offer to teach
them a better way at no charge. I help them to think for themselves
while staying away from all the sales pitches thrown at them by
people who seem to have no problem sticking their hands in other
people's pockets.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "hansjurgent" <hansjurgent16@h...>
wrote:

I think your jealous of her success and her comps. What a bitter
old man you have become.

You can get quite a few comps with low level gambling. I barely
take $500 to Vegas and I get free buffets and free rooms by using
her system and strategy. I used to play slots and lose $100 in a
half hour and now I play video poker and play for hours.

Thanks for contributing to the stigma that gambling is a low life
vice lower than drinking alcohol, smoking or overeating which kills
more people and wastes more taxpayer money than gambling. I
appreciate it.

You've become jealous of a retired school teacher what a sad man

you

are.

> I don't think you get it. Since when does someone who claims to

be

so
> frugal--and who really has a bunch of lower-level players that
> idolize her--blab so often about playing on the machines I
> mentioned? "Frugal" gamblers do not play higher than quarters,

and

> most of them can't even afford THAT. Anyone who buys into her vp
show
> whenever she toots her horn about all that casino junk and pile

of

> comps/gift certificates she gets "for free" SHOULD be intelligent
> enough to realize that it takes several hundred thousands of
dollars
> run through the machines every month to keep that nonsense up.

And

> that spells a-d-d-i-c-t-i-o-n. It also spells "I paid $650 for
> my 'free' lunch buffet I got with my points". That is NOT what
public
> figures should be teaching people.
>
> RS
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "hansjurgent"
<hansjurgent16@h...>
> wrote:
> > So she likes to gamble, don't we all (who are reading this)?
> >
> > Stop with these addict comments! It just perpetuates the

stigma

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> > associated with gambling.
> >
> > I would think if she was a guru she would be at most casino
> > promotions.
> >
> > She is not the "high roller gambler" but the "frugal gambler."
> >
> > Jealousy is so unbecoming.

"Judge not unless ye be judged."

You have a lot of bad prejudices. I'll be ignoring you now.

Long Live Jean Scott!

You still don't get it. The comps you're talking about and the

ones

she blabs about all the time are two different animals. And I
actually do far better than her with a lot less play at all
levels....and I win.

One point you didn't miss, however, is that video poker is a low-
class vice. Look around at any mostly locals casino at all the
regular vp players on your next visit. What do you see? Right--the
MAJORITY are some of the lowest of life's leftovers....people who
consume far too much alcohol, most are chain smokers, and many who
take pbesity to the highest level. Self-respect is NOT is most

video

poker player's vocabulary. Your lady hero would just as soon sell

her

products to anyone of these pathetic people, while I offer to

teach

them a better way at no charge. I help them to think for

themselves

while staying away from all the sales pitches thrown at them by
people who seem to have no problem sticking their hands in other
people's pockets.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "hansjurgent"

<hansjurgent16@h...>

wrote:
> I think your jealous of her success and her comps. What a

bitter

> old man you have become.
>
> You can get quite a few comps with low level gambling. I barely
> take $500 to Vegas and I get free buffets and free rooms by

using

> her system and strategy. I used to play slots and lose $100 in

a

> half hour and now I play video poker and play for hours.
>
> Thanks for contributing to the stigma that gambling is a low

life

> vice lower than drinking alcohol, smoking or overeating which

kills

> more people and wastes more taxpayer money than gambling. I
> appreciate it.
>
> You've become jealous of a retired school teacher what a sad man
you
> are.
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...>

wrote:

> > I don't think you get it. Since when does someone who claims

to

be
> so
> > frugal--and who really has a bunch of lower-level players that
> > idolize her--blab so often about playing on the machines I
> > mentioned? "Frugal" gamblers do not play higher than quarters,
and
> > most of them can't even afford THAT. Anyone who buys into her

vp

> show
> > whenever she toots her horn about all that casino junk and

pile

of
> > comps/gift certificates she gets "for free" SHOULD be

intelligent

> > enough to realize that it takes several hundred thousands of
> dollars
> > run through the machines every month to keep that nonsense up.
And
> > that spells a-d-d-i-c-t-i-o-n. It also spells "I paid $650 for
> > my 'free' lunch buffet I got with my points". That is NOT what
> public
> > figures should be teaching people.
> >
> > RS
> >
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "hansjurgent"
> <hansjurgent16@h...>
> > wrote:
> > > So she likes to gamble, don't we all (who are reading this)?
> > >
> > > Stop with these addict comments! It just perpetuates the
stigma
> > > associated with gambling.
> > >
> > > I would think if she was a guru she would be at most casino
> > > promotions.
> > >
> > > She is not the "high roller gambler" but the "frugal

gambler."

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

> > >
> > > Jealousy is so unbecoming.

deadin7 wrote:

You still don't get it. The comps you're talking about and the ones
she blabs about all the time are two different animals. And I
actually do far better than her with a lot less play at all
levels....and I win.

I feel a sneeze coming on. <Uhhh ... uhhhh .... uhhh-Bull Shit.> Excuse me, Rob, ... sorry about that ... you were saying ...?

Bill

deadin7 wrote:

Here's an example of just one of many, many e-mails I receive every
week.

snip

Hey, that's cool. Let me share a letter that is typical of the many that I receive very week, too.

Dear Bill,

You are such a great attorney and did such a great job for us that ... well ... my wife and I would like you to have our first born child. Knowing that this has probably happened to you repeatedly, you might already have a housefull of kids, so if you prefer, we will just name him William, or if a girl, Williamette, after you. Also, I have asked my wife to call me Bill when we are making love; hope you don't mind. Finally, your video poker strategy ROCKS; we have already made a hundred thousand dollars using it ... and that was just on the quarter machines.

With sincere gratitude,

Tom Cruise

Bill, you and this hans fellow are exactly the type of weak
individuals Jean thrives and preys off of. You both build her
confidence up so she feels right about developing that state of
theoretical fantasy which leads to it being "OK" to play far beyond
her means, and you're both incapable of thinking for yourselves. And
I don't think you personally WANT to believe I win so often and so
much because you cannot win yourself--although you just can't shake
that phony long-term/expert-play strategy habit--if you even really
play that way.

God bless you, and thank you for posting the shortest message of your
life!

deadin7 wrote:

> You still don't get it. The comps you're talking about and the

ones

> she blabs about all the time are two different animals. And I
> actually do far better than her with a lot less play at all
> levels....and I win.

I feel a sneeze coming on. <Uhhh ... uhhhh .... uhhh-Bull

Shit.>

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Bill Velek <billvelek@a...> wrote:

Excuse me, Rob, ... sorry about that ... you were saying ...?

Bill

Bill is good people.

Bill, you and this hans fellow are exactly the type of weak
individuals Jean thrives and preys off of. You both build her
confidence up so she feels right about developing that state of
theoretical fantasy which leads to it being "OK" to play far

beyond

her means, and you're both incapable of thinking for yourselves.

And

I don't think you personally WANT to believe I win so often and so
much because you cannot win yourself--although you just can't

shake

that phony long-term/expert-play strategy habit--if you even

really

play that way.

God bless you, and thank you for posting the shortest message of

your

life!

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Bill Velek <billvelek@a...>

wrote:

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

> deadin7 wrote:
>
> > You still don't get it. The comps you're talking about and the
ones
> > she blabs about all the time are two different animals. And I
> > actually do far better than her with a lot less play at all
> > levels....and I win.
>
> I feel a sneeze coming on. <Uhhh ... uhhhh .... uhhh-Bull
Shit.>
> Excuse me, Rob, ... sorry about that ... you were saying ...?
>
> Bill

hansjurgent wrote:

Bill is good people.

Thanks, Hans, but the fact is that most of us are good people, even though we all aren't right all the time. I'm sure there is a good side to Rob, too, even though he is a bit presumptuous (e.g., about how much certain folks gamble and whether they have problems, etc).

> God bless you, ...

Thank you, Rob, and God bless you, too. See what I mean, Hans. Rob is obviously religious.

... and thank you for posting the shortest message of your life!

Actually, I believe my shortest message has been "test". :wink:

Cheers.

Bill Velek

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <ROB> wrote:

The true definition of "Good People": "Those who honesly are as
good in mind, spirit and actions towards others when they get behind
the wheel and drive, as they are with everyone they deal with in any
other everyday business or social environment".

If you guys match that, I salute you. I did not - until I recognized
the fault of my ways around 10 years ago. Likewise, my play results
also drastically turned around when I recognized the faulty and
misleading ways of the gurus teachings in 1996.

hansjurgent wrote:

> Bill is good people.

Thanks, Hans, but the fact is that most of us are good people, even
though we all aren't right all the time. I'm sure there is a good

side

to Rob, too, even though he is a bit presumptuous (e.g., about how

much

certain folks gamble and whether they have problems, etc).

> > God bless you, ...

Thank you, Rob, and God bless you, too. See what I mean, Hans.

Rob is

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Bill Velek <billvelek@a...> wrote:

> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <ROB> wrote:
obviously religious.

> ... and thank you for posting the shortest message of your life!

Actually, I believe my shortest message has been "test". :wink:

Cheers.

Bill Velek

The true definition of "Good People": "Those who honesly are as
good in mind, spirit and actions towards others when they get

behind

the wheel and drive, as they are with everyone they deal with in

any

other everyday business or social environment".

Rob, if this is your definition of "good people" then I think you
need to expand your thinking quite a bit. Some people don't even
drive. I guess by your definition they could never be "good people".

If you guys match that, I salute you. I did not - until I

recognized

the fault of my ways around 10 years ago.

I'm glad you're a more courteous driver now.

Likewise, my play results
also drastically turned around when I recognized the faulty and
misleading ways of the gurus teachings in 1996.

You might as well say airplanes can't fly, the earth is flat, or the
sun revolves around the earth. The gurus didn't create the universe
or the mathematics that describe it, and whatever you say will
_never_ change the _fact_ that it's mathematics that determines VP
results over the long term.

You may not like it that the gurus have provided this information to
the masses, however, they are correct in their mathematical analysis
of VP.

One more thing. I did not originally take the gurus words on faith.
So, in 1998 when I started playing VP I wrote my own computer
programs to analyze VP. Guess what? I came up with the identical
results as described by the gurus.

So, if you have a better system, let's program it into a computer and
compare the results.

Dick

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote: