vpFREE2 Forums

Second Hand Smoke---More Dangerous Than You Think!

#41

> > Who would be disappointed at winning $25K instead of $100K?
ROTFLMAO.

> Answer: Someone who's win goal that particular day was $2500, and
> because of the Royal (Flamingo in Laughlin) he went home with
$18,000. Immediately. It's called "success without greed". But in

your lingo it's called "losing while addicted".

Still LMAO. I can see why you'd be called a goof ball.

Yup. A goof ball with an extra $18k. That's pretty goofy, no?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

#42

Is that the math they taught you in MBA school? I think everone else
comes up with -$75K. Still LMAO.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:
  
> > > Who would be disappointed at winning $25K instead of $100K?
> ROTFLMAO.

> > Answer: Someone who's win goal that particular day was $2500, and
> > because of the Royal (Flamingo in Laughlin) he went home with
> $18,000. Immediately. It's called "success without greed". But in
your lingo it's called "losing while addicted".

> Still LMAO. I can see why you'd be called a goof ball.

Yup. A goof ball with an extra $18k. That's pretty goofy, no?

#43

>
>
> > > > Who would be disappointed at winning $25K instead of $100K?
> > ROTFLMAO.
>
> > > Answer: Someone who's win goal that particular day was $2500,

and

> > > because of the Royal (Flamingo in Laughlin) he went home with
> > $18,000. Immediately. It's called "success without greed". But

in

> your lingo it's called "losing while addicted".
>
> > Still LMAO. I can see why you'd be called a goof ball.
>
> Yup. A goof ball with an extra $18k. That's pretty goofy, no?

Is that the math they taught you in MBA school? I think everone

else comes up with -$75K. Still LMAO.

Here's what I was taught: Count the money baby. Not the phantom bucks!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@> wrote:
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

#44

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > > Who would be disappointed at winning $25K instead of

$100K?

> > > ROTFLMAO.
> >
> > > > Answer: Someone who's win goal that particular day was

$2500,

and
> > > > because of the Royal (Flamingo in Laughlin) he went home

with

> > > $18,000. Immediately. It's called "success without greed".

But

in
> > your lingo it's called "losing while addicted".
> >
> > > Still LMAO. I can see why you'd be called a goof ball.
> >
> > Yup. A goof ball with an extra $18k. That's pretty goofy, no?
>
> Is that the math they taught you in MBA school? I think everone
else comes up with -$75K. Still LMAO.

Here's what I was taught: Count the money baby. Not the phantom

bucks!

It's not about the money, it's about your statement. You were
not "disappointed" at leaving $75K on the table. Still LMAO.

#45

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > > > Who would be disappointed at winning $25K instead of
$100K?
> > > > ROTFLMAO.
> > >
> > > > > Answer: Someone who's win goal that particular day was
$2500,
> and
> > > > > because of the Royal (Flamingo in Laughlin) he went home
with
> > > > $18,000. Immediately. It's called "success without greed".
But
> in
> > > your lingo it's called "losing while addicted".
> > >
> > > > Still LMAO. I can see why you'd be called a goof ball.
> > >
> > > Yup. A goof ball with an extra $18k. That's pretty goofy, no?
> >
> > Is that the math they taught you in MBA school? I think

everone

> else comes up with -$75K. Still LMAO.
>
> Here's what I was taught: Count the money baby. Not the phantom
bucks!

It's not about the money, it's about your statement. You were
not "disappointed" at leaving $75K on the table. Still LMAO.

Not at all. Addicts of course would be. Degenerate gamblers would
be. That means AP's would be. Not me. That's why I win and you don't.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

#46

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > > > > Who would be disappointed at winning $25K instead of
> $100K?
> > > > > ROTFLMAO.
> > > >
> > > > > > Answer: Someone who's win goal that particular day was
> $2500,
> > and
> > > > > > because of the Royal (Flamingo in Laughlin) he went

home

> with
> > > > > $18,000. Immediately. It's called "success without

greed".

> But
> > in
> > > > your lingo it's called "losing while addicted".
> > > >
> > > > > Still LMAO. I can see why you'd be called a goof ball.
> > > >
> > > > Yup. A goof ball with an extra $18k. That's pretty goofy,

no?

> > >
> > > Is that the math they taught you in MBA school? I think
everone
> > else comes up with -$75K. Still LMAO.
> >
> > Here's what I was taught: Count the money baby. Not the phantom
> bucks!
>
> It's not about the money, it's about your statement. You were
> not "disappointed" at leaving $75K on the table. Still LMAO.

Not at all. Addicts of course would be. Degenerate gamblers would
be. That means AP's would be. Not me. That's why I win and you

don't.

I think we now have some insight into Rob's claims of success.
According to Rob, not taking home an extra $75K is the reason he
wins. Makes you wonder what his losses are.

#47

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > Who would be disappointed at winning $25K instead

of

> > $100K?
> > > > > > ROTFLMAO.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Answer: Someone who's win goal that particular day

was

> > $2500,
> > > and
> > > > > > > because of the Royal (Flamingo in Laughlin) he went
home
> > with
> > > > > > $18,000. Immediately. It's called "success without
greed".
> > But
> > > in
> > > > > your lingo it's called "losing while addicted".
> > > > >
> > > > > > Still LMAO. I can see why you'd be called a goof ball.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yup. A goof ball with an extra $18k. That's pretty goofy,
no?
> > > >
> > > > Is that the math they taught you in MBA school? I think
> everone
> > > else comes up with -$75K. Still LMAO.
> > >
> > > Here's what I was taught: Count the money baby. Not the

phantom

> > bucks!
> >
> > It's not about the money, it's about your statement. You were
> > not "disappointed" at leaving $75K on the table. Still LMAO.
>
> Not at all. Addicts of course would be. Degenerate gamblers would
> be. That means AP's would be. Not me. That's why I win and you
don't.

I think we now have some insight into Rob's claims of success.
According to Rob, not taking home an extra $75K is the reason he
wins. Makes you wonder what his losses are.

Isn't that typical of a losing vp player to worry over how someone
else did! Hmmm....I realize $18k is a lot of money to you, but to me
it's a simple attained session goal. Greed is what caused your hero
Yuri to fail and be humiliated in front of everyone he made believe
the math would see him thru with, and I can see you really have no
idea how much $18k or $75k is for that matter. Make believe they're
phantom bucks and I'm giving them all to you. Now go buy that motor
home you've always wanted but couldn't afford!! NOW!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

#48

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > > > > > > Who would be disappointed at winning $25K instead
of
> > > $100K?
> > > > > > > ROTFLMAO.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Answer: Someone who's win goal that particular day
was
> > > $2500,
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > because of the Royal (Flamingo in Laughlin) he went
> home
> > > with
> > > > > > > $18,000. Immediately. It's called "success without
> greed".
> > > But
> > > > in
> > > > > > your lingo it's called "losing while addicted".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Still LMAO. I can see why you'd be called a goof ball.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yup. A goof ball with an extra $18k. That's pretty

goofy,

> no?
> > > > >
> > > > > Is that the math they taught you in MBA school? I think
> > everone
> > > > else comes up with -$75K. Still LMAO.
> > > >
> > > > Here's what I was taught: Count the money baby. Not the
phantom
> > > bucks!
> > >
> > > It's not about the money, it's about your statement. You were
> > > not "disappointed" at leaving $75K on the table. Still LMAO.
> >
> > Not at all. Addicts of course would be. Degenerate gamblers

would

> > be. That means AP's would be. Not me. That's why I win and you
> don't.
>
> I think we now have some insight into Rob's claims of success.
> According to Rob, not taking home an extra $75K is the reason he
> wins. Makes you wonder what his losses are.

Isn't that typical of a losing vp player to worry over how someone
else did!

I think your getting a little paranoid in addition to your other
obvious psychological disorders. Go get help.

Hmmm....I realize $18k is a lot of money to you, but to me
it's a simple attained session goal. Greed is what caused your hero
Yuri to fail

Other than from you, I've never heard of Yuri. Please explain how
someone I've never heard of could be my hero?

and be humiliated in front of everyone he made believe
the math would see him thru with, and I can see you really have no
idea how much $18k or $75k is for that matter. Make believe they're
phantom bucks and I'm giving them all to you. Now go buy that motor
home you've always wanted but couldn't afford!! NOW!

Looks like the truth him home. A massive babble-attack from the
babblemaster. LMAO.

#49

> > > > > Here's what I was taught: Count the money baby. Not the
> phantom bucks!
> > > >
> > > > It's not about the money, it's about your statement. You

were

> > > > not "disappointed" at leaving $75K on the table. Still LMAO.
> > >
> > > Not at all. Addicts of course would be. Degenerate gamblers
would
> > > be. That means AP's would be. Not me. That's why I win and

you

> > don't.
> >
> > I think we now have some insight into Rob's claims of success.
> > According to Rob, not taking home an extra $75K is the reason

he

> > wins. Makes you wonder what his losses are.
>
> Isn't that typical of a losing vp player to worry over how

someone else did!

I think your getting a little paranoid in addition to your other
obvious psychological disorders. Go get help.

No, looks like I'm taking you to school again. That's the help you
require.

> Hmmm....I realize $18k is a lot of money to you, but to me
> it's a simple attained session goal. Greed is what caused your

hero Yuri to fail

Other than from you, I've never heard of Yuri. Please explain how
someone I've never heard of could be my hero?

You've heard about him from me and a few others here. Go thru your
fabled vpFREE archives and you'll read his humiliating story again.
And he's your hero allright....just as much as he's now your ZERO. A
theoretical bozo who lived math models, optimal play and +EV
machines....that is, until he got clobbered by the reality stick.
Kinda the same path to destruction you're on!

> and be humiliated in front of everyone he made believe
> the math would see him thru with, and I can see you really have

no

> idea how much $18k or $75k is for that matter. Make believe

they're

> phantom bucks and I'm giving them all to you. Now go buy that

motor

> home you've always wanted but couldn't afford!! NOW!

Looks like the truth him home. A massive babble-attack from the
babblemaster. LMAO.

And was it fun watching my truths hit home again or WHAT!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote: