vpFREE2 Forums

Refreshing information

>
> Since your system came along first, where's YOUR proof? Or has it
> gone Poof!

Standard statisics, Mr MBS. Or, is that too far over your head.

Like

I've indicated before it's the same theory used by ALL of the

fortune

500 companies in this country.

I'm sure glad I don't live in such a make-believe, wannabee world as
you portray yourself out to be. Did you have to calculate if it
really was possible to wipe your own ass after a dump before you
actually did it? Show me the stats on paper--or else I won't believe
you can do it!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> > I kind of think you may be a tad bit off the mark. I am the

only

> > truth in video poker, and everyone knows it.
> Then why have you been caught in so many lies in our discussion?

The implication of being 'caught' by you in a lie is similar to
hearing an explanation for one of Jean Scott's face-lifts.

Can't deny it can you? Where's those math guys? Where's your proof?
Etc., etc.

> All I want is a proof your flat earth system works. That's it.

Come

> on, where is it?

I believe you've firmly proven you don't have what it takes

upstairs

to understand what I did and do. Just like you wouldn't be able to
comnprehend that I hit four Aces 4 times these pat 3 days using my
Advanced RTT Play Strategy, and that I won $4500 with it.

RS standard response #5. (Change the subject when you don't have a
good answer)

> Nice try, just another attempt to evade my question. YOU'VE been
> challenged and all you do is hide your head in the sand. What's
your real name and where's your proof.

Your system was 1st. So prove it and stop ducking it. Be a man and
stop acting like a woman would when asked for proof. If you don't,
then it's for certain you're in the Queen's Club of Losers!

RS standard response #2. You're still ducking ...

>
> > And I think I'll keep it in there since it bothers you so much.
> Robs' standard response #5.

What, that you're a weasel?

RS standard response #4.

>
>> And on paper is where you'll need to prove you flat earth system
> works if you want anybody to believe you.

And I couldn't care less who believe's me--that's the point you

keep

missing out on. I guess it can't sift thru that geek-head of yours.

Then why do you keep posting? You obviously care a lot and your
inflated ego won't let you do otherwise. So, either get lost or
submit a proof for examination?

>But then, it doesn't work on paper does it? And, it won't work

for

> the general public either.

It so
geekish of you to be worried about what you worry about all the

time.

As I've said, imagine waking up next to you every day....or even

once

a month!!

You ARE repeating yourself. Not uncommon since you have only 5
variations on your replies. (RS standard response #4).

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> >
> > Since your system came along first, where's YOUR proof? Or has

it

> > gone Poof!
>
> Standard statisics, Mr MBS. Or, is that too far over your head.
Like
> I've indicated before it's the same theory used by ALL of the
fortune
> 500 companies in this country.

I'm sure glad I don't live in such a make-believe, wannabee world

as

you portray yourself out to be. Did you have to calculate if it
really was possible to wipe your own ass after a dump before you
actually did it? Show me the stats on paper--or else I won't

believe

you can do it!

Still ducking and ducking and ducking. You work really hard at this
don't you? Must be from years of experience ducking this same
question. Once again, where's your proof?

Dick

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

> The implication of being 'caught' by you in a lie is similar to

> hearing an explanation for one of Jean Scott's face-lifts.
Can't deny it can you? Where's those math guys? Where's your proof?

I know what I did, I know what the people I paid did, and I have no
need to explain it to an Internet hack like you. You continue to be
jealous of my winning, and get frustrated no end when you can't
figure it out on your slide rule. Proof to others is validated by
results and historical data taken from hundreds of events.
Theoretical proof on paper means nothing to me, you, or anyone else
interested in how someone else is able to consistently win. That's
why you're an armchair geek hiding behind his computer and whatever
else gives you comfort up there, while I'm out playing and winning
every single week.

Then why do you keep posting? You obviously care a lot and your
inflated ego won't let you do otherwise. So, either get lost or
submit a proof for examination?

The reason I post is for others to learn by, and for even more to see
how dumb you are. You keep posting because it's your only hope for
any fame--chatting with me. And whether or not you realize this, you
are making others on vpfree write to me and say how stupid you've
shown yourself to be. One of them has met you and didn't see this
side of you before. You do inflate my ego though. I come away almost
every time knowing I'm smarter than you, I'm healthier than you, and
I have a better life than you.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

Tell me, Dick, indicate to me you're not the Internet hack I've
proven you out to be, and submit the geek stats for all of us to see
showing the theory behind butt-wiping. If you can't do that, how
could the actual event exist?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

> I'm sure glad I don't live in such a make-believe, wannabee world
as
> you portray yourself out to be. Did you have to calculate if it
> really was possible to wipe your own ass after a dump before you
> actually did it? Show me the stats on paper--or else I won't
believe
> you can do it!

Still ducking and ducking and ducking. You work really hard at this
don't you? Must be from years of experience ducking this same
question. Once again, where's your proof?

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> > I'm sure glad I don't live in such a make-believe, wannabee

world

> as
> > you portray yourself out to be. Did you have to calculate if it
> > really was possible to wipe your own ass after a dump before

you

> > actually did it? Show me the stats on paper--or else I won't
> believe
> > you can do it!
>
> Still ducking and ducking and ducking. You work really hard at

this

> don't you? Must be from years of experience ducking this same
> question. Once again, where's your proof?

Tell me, Dick, indicate to me you're not the Internet hack I've
proven you out to be, and submit the geek stats for all of us to

see

showing the theory behind butt-wiping. If you can't do that, how
could the actual event exist?

Like I've said many times, submit your REAL name and I'll provide you
with personal information on myself. Clearly, you're scared S-less to
print your real name. Probably several felony warrants exist for you
already. It all fits in easily with your immoral behavior.

Either provide your name or crawl back into your hole.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>> > The implication of being 'caught' by you in a lie is similar

to

> > hearing an explanation for one of Jean Scott's face-lifts.
> Can't deny it can you? Where's those math guys? Where's your

proof?

I know what I did, I know what the people I paid did, and I have no
need to explain it to an Internet hack like you.

That's because you NEVER did anything. It's all a big lie. You are
about as gutless as they get.

You continue to be
jealous of my winning, and get frustrated no end when you can't
figure it out on your slide rule. Proof to others is validated by
results and historical data taken from hundreds of events.
Theoretical proof on paper means nothing to me, you, or anyone else
interested in how someone else is able to consistently win.

That's where you're dead wrong and clearly as stupid as a high
DENSity rock. If you aren't smart enough to provide a proof then go
away and play your flat earth system.

That's
why you're an armchair geek hiding behind his computer and whatever
else gives you comfort up there, while I'm out playing and winning
every single week.

And you previously called me addicted ...

>
> Then why do you keep posting? You obviously care a lot and your
> inflated ego won't let you do otherwise. So, either get lost or
> submit a proof for examination?

The reason I post is for others to learn by, and for even more to

see

how dumb you are.

Let's see, I can figure out that 1+1=2, whereas you argue it doesn't
with your flat earth system. You duck and hide when ask for a proof
of your system and won't even reveal your REAL name. When it comes to
DUMB you own the patent.

You keep posting because it's your only hope for
any fame--chatting with me.

Wrong again. You are the last one I'd ever consider famous. All I'm
doing to showing what a liar and fraud you really are. You duck every
single attempt to determine whether your system generally works. Of
course, it doesn't, which is why you always attempt to change the
subject.

And whether or not you realize this, you
are making others on vpfree write to me and say how stupid you've
shown yourself to be. One of them has met you and didn't see this
side of you before. You do inflate my ego though. I come away

almost

every time knowing I'm smarter than you,

Prove it. Let's start with your real name. Can you remember it? The
only person I've ever heard say you were smart is yourself.

I'm healthier than you, and

Prove it. Let's see your latest doctor's evaluation of your health.

I have a better life than you.

Let's see your "better life" proof. That ought to be interesting.

Since you know nothing about me this is clearly just another attempt
to change the subject away from your unproveable flat earth system.
How many times is that now?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

> Tell me, Dick, indicate to me you're not the Internet hack I've
> proven you out to be, and submit the geek stats for all of us to
see
> showing the theory behind butt-wiping. If you can't do that, how
> could the actual event exist?

Like I've said many times, submit your REAL name and I'll provide

you with personal information on myself. Clearly, you're scared S-
less to print your real name. Probably several felony warrants exist
for you already. It all fits in easily with your immoral behavior.

Either provide your name or crawl back into your hole.

That was brilliant. I'm still waiting for proof that butt-wiping
exists anywhere other than on paper.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

That's because you NEVER did anything. It's all a big lie. You are
about as gutless as they get.

So prove it! Show everyone what's in that mind of yours that doesn't
reside under the same prove-it-to-me rules you require of anyone
who's more successful than you. Grease up that slide rule and let's
have the facts!

> You continue to be
> jealous of my winning, and get frustrated no end when you can't
> figure it out on your slide rule. Proof to others is validated by
> results and historical data taken from hundreds of events.
> Theoretical proof on paper means nothing to me, you, or anyone

else

> interested in how someone else is able to consistently win.

That's where you're dead wrong and clearly as stupid as a high
DENSity rock. If you aren't smart enough to provide a proof then go
away and play your flat earth system.

You're irritability with this is clearly a sign that there's a bit of
jealousy here. You take on the role of a troll who says "I see it but
I don't believe it" and "I'll believe it when you can show me the
theory behind it all". Now do you understand when I say you must lead
a sour life up there in the land of 10,000 geeks?

> That's
> why you're an armchair geek hiding behind his computer and

whatever

> else gives you comfort up there, while I'm out playing and

winning

> every single week.

And you previously called me addicted ...

Yeah. It depends on what old-man mood you're in at any given moment.
Waffles must be your favorite breakfast.

> You keep posting because it's your only hope for
> any fame--chatting with me.

Wrong again. You are the last one I'd ever consider famous. All I'm
doing to showing what a liar and fraud you really are. You duck

every single attempt to determine whether your system generally
works. Of course, it doesn't, which is why you always attempt to
change the subject.

Let's see--another jealous wannabee who decides I'm a liar and a
fraud. Hmmmm.... You're so much smarter than publishers and producers
that it's a wonder they aren't begging you for info or support on
those famous words. Bottom line until that happens: You love the fame
of chatting with Rob Singer.

Prove it. Let's start with your real name. Can you remember it? The
only person I've ever heard say you were smart is yourself.

You and that real name phobia. Would somebody please forward it to
him?? Of course, you'd have it all if you weren't so afraid to meet
me in Nevada. What else frightens you--the truth?

> I'm healthier than you, and

Prove it. Let's see your latest doctor's evaluation of your health.

Meet me in Nevada on one of your 2-hour "advantage-play" trips, and
I'll show you in person. Last week, while hiking for 3 hours in Red
Rock Canyon there, I started to think of you, and how humiliating it
would be to see you peter out in the first 4 minutes.

Let's see your "better life" proof. That ought to be interesting.

A. I don't live in Minnesota.
B. I'm not you.
C. Everything else.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

You are such a wimpy mama's boy. Of all things I ask below, all you
could do is dodge the questions. You are such a loser. Come on, take
off those panties and print your REAL name. Of course, you won't, you
don't have the guts. Reid's proof demonstates your flat-earth system
is worthless, your replies demonstate you are worthless.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> That's because you NEVER did anything. It's all a big lie. You

are

> about as gutless as they get.

So prove it! Show everyone what's in that mind of yours that

doesn't

reside under the same prove-it-to-me rules you require of anyone
who's more successful than you. Grease up that slide rule and let's
have the facts!

Prove what? That you're system doesn't work? DONE, just go back and
re-read Reids' proof.

Prove that you're a complete loser? DONE, just look at the way you
continually duck and avoid all questions about your worthless flat
earth system.

>
> > You continue to be
> > jealous of my winning, and get frustrated no end when you can't
> > figure it out on your slide rule. Proof to others is validated

by

> > results and historical data taken from hundreds of events.
> > Theoretical proof on paper means nothing to me, you, or anyone
else
> > interested in how someone else is able to consistently win.
>
> That's where you're dead wrong and clearly as stupid as a high
> DENSity rock. If you aren't smart enough to provide a proof then

go

> away and play your flat earth system.

You're irritability with this is clearly a sign that there's a bit

of

jealousy here. You take on the role of a troll who says "I see it

but

I don't believe it" and "I'll believe it when you can show me the
theory behind it all". Now do you understand when I say you must

lead

a sour life up there in the land of 10,000 geeks?

RS standard reply #4. Can't mamas boy come up with anything original?

>
> > That's
> > why you're an armchair geek hiding behind his computer and
whatever
> > else gives you comfort up there, while I'm out playing and
winning
> > every single week.
>
> And you previously called me addicted ...

Yeah. It depends on what old-man mood you're in at any given

moment.

Waffles must be your favorite breakfast.

No, it proves you are a complete hypocrite. You say one thing and do
another.

>
> > You keep posting because it's your only hope for
> > any fame--chatting with me.
>
> Wrong again. You are the last one I'd ever consider famous. All

I'm

> doing to showing what a liar and fraud you really are. You duck
every single attempt to determine whether your system generally
works. Of course, it doesn't, which is why you always attempt to
change the subject.

Let's see--another jealous wannabee who decides I'm a liar and a
fraud. Hmmmm....

No decision necessary, your continual dodging says it all.

You're so much smarter than publishers and producers

Are these the same bozos that allow plagiarism in their rag? Yep.
What a reference you've come up with. Just as immoral as you are.

that it's a wonder they aren't begging you for info or support on
those famous words. Bottom line until that happens: You love the

fame

of chatting with Rob Singer.

I love the fact you obviously dodge all questions about your
worthless system. You are such a loser and you're so blind you can't
even see it.

>
> Prove it. Let's start with your real name. Can you remember it?

The

> only person I've ever heard say you were smart is yourself.

You and that real name phobia. Would somebody please forward it to
him?? Of course, you'd have it all if you weren't so afraid to meet
me in Nevada. What else frightens you--the truth?

Gutless Rob strikes again. Maybe if you ask nicely your mama will
send it to me.

>
> > I'm healthier than you, and
>
> Prove it. Let's see your latest doctor's evaluation of your

health.

Meet me in Nevada on one of your 2-hour "advantage-play" trips, and
I'll show you in person. Last week, while hiking for 3 hours in Red
Rock Canyon there, I started to think of you, and how humiliating

it

would be to see you peter out in the first 4 minutes.

Three whole hours. Wow, was mama holding your hand the whole time?

>
> Let's see your "better life" proof. That ought to be interesting.

A. I don't live in Minnesota.
B. I'm not you.
C. Everything else.

This sounds like a proof you'd come up with. Let me give you my
version.

A. I don't have to lie and cheat to make everyone think I'm a big man.
B. I don't have to get Mama's permission to say my real name.
C. I'm smart enough to recognize a valid proof when it's presented.

I could go on and on but then you'd probably get your panties all wet.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

I see you took your idiot medicine like a good mamas boy.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

I'm still waiting for proof that butt-wiping
exists anywhere other than on paper.

You are such a wimpy mama's boy. Of all things I ask below, all you
could do is dodge the questions. You are such a loser. Come on,

take off those panties and print your REAL name. Of course, you
won't, you don't have the guts. Reid's proof demonstates your flat-
earth system is worthless, your replies demonstate you are worthless.

Meet me in Nevada and prove you're a man--fat or not.
Reid who?

Prove what? That you're system doesn't work? DONE, just go back and
re-read Reids' proof.

How about proving to me that I cannot and have not won--like you keep
saying. Then prove to me that butt-wiping exists. In your world,
nothing is real unless it's a proven theory. So go ahead and do it!--
and don't forget the TP.

No, it proves you are a complete hypocrite. You say one thing and

do another.

???

Are these the same bozos that allow plagiarism in their rag? Yep.
What a reference you've come up with. Just as immoral as you are.

More jealousy. GT: 35 years of plagiarism and immorality. GBC: 40
years of the same. What a genius you must be!!

I love the fact you obviously dodge all questions about your
worthless system. You are such a loser and you're so blind you

can't even see it.

You've got all the facts and you choose not to accept them since they
won't pass the Dicky slide rule geek test. Or do I mean fat
boy....yes, I've now got info on you like I said I'd get. No wonder
you hate me. You're sooooo fat! It's hilarious!!!

A. I don't have to lie and cheat to make everyone think I'm a big

man.

6'2", 206lbs.

B. I don't have to get Mama's permission to say my real name.

"Dick" isn't your real name.

C. I'm smart enough to recognize a valid proof when it's presented.

How about turning that around and proving the butt-wipe theory.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

Crying about it won't help you. Show proof, or who will believe
anything you write. Internet hacks get exposed every day. Why do it
to yourself? Cmon---produce the butt-wiping theory, or wash your
hands of it!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> I'm still waiting for proof that butt-wiping
> exists anywhere other than on paper.

I see you took your idiot medicine like a good mamas boy.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> You are such a wimpy mama's boy. Of all things I ask below, all

you

> could do is dodge the questions. You are such a loser. Come on,
take off those panties and print your REAL name. Of course, you
won't, you don't have the guts. Reid's proof demonstates your flat-
earth system is worthless, your replies demonstate you are

worthless.

Meet me in Nevada and prove you're a man--fat or not.

Don't get your panties all in a bunch, I'll be in Nevada in a couple
of months.

Reid who?

Now this is really and obvious lie. You previously stated you had
your mythical mathematicians review Reids' proof. How many lies is
that now. Must be in double figures. You should check with your mama
before posting again.

>
> Prove what? That you're system doesn't work? DONE, just go back

and

> re-read Reids' proof.

How about proving to me that I cannot and have not won--like you

keep

saying.

I have never said that. One more lie. In fact, I have said just the
opposite. So, I guess that makes two more lies.

Once again, so that your underfunctioning brain can understand. It is
possible to be on the right side of the bell curve and win with a
negative system. That's why you need a mathematical evaluation to
understand how any system will work for the general gambling
population. I could care less how good or bad you do, I do care that
you are fostering a fraud in an attempt to build your ego.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

Then prove to me that butt-wiping exists. In your world,
nothing is real unless it's a proven theory. So go ahead and do it!-

-

and don't forget the TP.

Looks like mamas' boy needs his diaper changed. Still scared to even
say his real name on a public forum. Instead you hide behind a line
of nonsense. Come out from behind mamas' apron and state your name.
But then you don't have the GUTs, do you? You just whimper along with
your nonsense posts. If I ever saw a poster child for LOSER, you are
IT.

>
> No, it proves you are a complete hypocrite. You say one thing and
do another.

???

Not surprising you'd erase YOUR hypocritcal statement. You are such a
LOSER.

>
> Are these the same bozos that allow plagiarism in their rag? Yep.
> What a reference you've come up with. Just as immoral as you are.

More jealousy. GT: 35 years of plagiarism and immorality. GBC: 40
years of the same. What a genius you must be!!

The proof is they ALLOW plagiarism and they hired you. Not much else
needs to be said. Let's see, how long has the Nat'l Enq. been around?

>
> I love the fact you obviously dodge all questions about your
> worthless system. You are such a loser and you're so blind you
can't even see it.

You've got all the facts and you choose not to accept them since

they

won't pass the Dicky slide rule geek test.

Don't worry little munchkin, you'll get better as soon as mama gets
home. Maybe she'll explain to you that those facts prove your
progressive system is worthless. It's OBVIOUSLY way above your head.

Or do I mean fat
boy....yes, I've now got info on you like I said I'd get. No wonder
you hate me. You're sooooo fat! It's hilarious!!!

Sure you do, you travelled all the way to Minnesota to spy on me.
Give me a break. You really are starting to panic. So, let's hear
some of this info ...

>
> A. I don't have to lie and cheat to make everyone think I'm a big
man.

6'2", 206lbs.

Who is this supporsed to be? Your mama?

> B. I don't have to get Mama's permission to say my real name.

"Dick" isn't your real name.

It isn't? Are you really this stupid? Don't you even know what "Dick"
is short for? You know like "William" and "Bill" or "Robert"
and "Rob". You can't help but demonstate how stupid you are in front
of everyone. Now, what's your name again? OH, that's right, your
cowering in your own execretions at the thought of saying it.

> C. I'm smart enough to recognize a valid proof when it's

presented.

How about turning that around and proving the butt-wipe theory.

You seem to be stuck on butt-wiping. Is that how you scratch your
head when attempting to sound intelligent?

And just to make it CLEAR, once again, to Dilberts' manager, Robbie.
I don't have a theory. I use the proven technology of advantage play.
That's expert play + comps + CB + BB + ... You've even stated you
understand and USE expert play 90+% of the time. Now, who's the idiot
that keeps saying that THIS system doesn't work. It's mamas' favorite
boy, Robbie. And, who's the one that's AFRAID to post his real name
so that everyone will know who that idiot really is. Once again it's
mama's boy, Robbie. Finally, who's the one that had to copy the old
Martingale system and call it his own just to satisfy his swollen
ego? You got it ...

Don't get your panties all in a bunch, I'll be in Nevada in a

couple of months.

Why wait? It'll save you a lot of the moronic posts you write in-
between the arthritic aches.

Now this is really and obvious lie. You previously stated you had
your mythical mathematicians review Reids' proof. How many lies is
that now. Must be in double figures. You should check with your

mama before posting again.

Reid....as in who cares about Reid? dodo. And it wasn't
Reid's 'proof'--it was similar concepts written by others who weren't
enthralled in gambling losses so much as to skew their theories.

> How about proving to me that I cannot and have not won--like you
keep saying.

I have never said that. One more lie. In fact, I have said just the
opposite. So, I guess that makes two more lies.

Do the words "liar" and "fraud" ring any bells??

Once again, so that your underfunctioning brain can understand. It

is possible to be on the right side of the bell curve and win with a

negative system.

So on the other hand, your waffling on the issue now points to the
fact that I am not a liar and a fraud. Do you see why you look like a
nut?

That's why you need a mathematical evaluation to

understand how any system will work for the general gambling
population. I could care less how good or bad you do, I do care

that you are fostering a fraud in an attempt to build your ego.

I believe you are on a reverse ego trip. How many times does it take
to get it through your fat head that I did not develop these
strategies for the gambling public. Those who are piqued by it can
ask me any questions or for any advice, and the answers are always
the same. Everything surrounding this is clearly spelled out on my
site and in my Play Strategies numerous times throughout my site and
in my articles. Take of the coke-bottle glasses, remember to take
your alzheimers medication, and read with some kind of understanding
this time around.

If I ever saw a poster child for LOSER, you are IT.

Now we have to endure your typing of the word 'mama' over and over
again, instead of you showing you have any kind of intelligence
allowing you to be worthy of chatting with me. I'm still waiting for
you to prove, by example, your mathematical prowess rather than
showing on and on what an Internet hack you are. Go ahead....prove
butt-wiping does exist on paper. Show me the calculations behind
the 'theory'.

> More jealousy. GT: 35 years of plagiarism and immorality. GBC: 40
> years of the same. What a genius you must be!!
The proof is they ALLOW plagiarism and they hired you. Not much

else needs to be said. Let's see, how long has the Nat'l Enq. been
around?

Sounds like just another way of saying they're immoral as you said
earlier. GBC has me on their shelves right along with your Queen and
Bob Dancer. GT put a column in every week by Elliott Fromme--right
there next to mine. Even though he was a mercy hiring, he
is 'allowed' to write the same nonsense you push that bores people to
death. But GT & GBC both 'allow' varying points of view. the Queen's,
Dancer's and Fromme's happens to be a theory--and mine reality. So
who do you think's more popular and believable....and truthful?

Sure you do, you travelled all the way to Minnesota to spy on me.
Give me a break. You really are starting to panic. So, let's hear
some of this info ...

If you knew more about me you'd know I don't have to 'travel' to know
what I want to. I know what I need to, and if you tossed up a full
picture of yourself here then everyone would know why you talk like a
weasel on a computer. It's guys like you that make me look good....

> > B. I don't have to get Mama's permission to say my real name.

Nope. I don't write it anywhere -- my own policy--even though it's
been all over vpfree and other places for years. You must be the only
hack that didn't get it!

You seem to be stuck on butt-wiping. Is that how you scratch your
head when attempting to sound intelligent?

No, it's how I'll rate you as a theorist once you supply anything
other than BS about your so-called knowledge.

And just to make it CLEAR, once again, to Dilberts' manager,

Robbie. I don't have a theory. I use the proven technology of
advantage play. That's expert play + comps + CB + BB + ... You've
even stated you understand and USE expert play 90+% of the time. Now,
who's the idiot that keeps saying that THIS system doesn't work.

You'll have to explain this Dilbert--never heard of him or her.
What's this 'proven technology'?? Are you kookoo? I don't worry about
what you're neurotic about--CB, BB, comps, and all the other baloney
that runs your video poker life. I play for profit and on my own
terms. Your 'expert'play' is nothing more than common sense to me,
and I'm smart enough to know when not to use it. If you want to be
reeled in and soaked dry by playing exactly as any casino manager
wants you to, then that's why you're so jealous of my success. Go
ahead and chase those promotions like being led around by a pied
piper. All you'll do is keep the machines full for me.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> Don't get your panties all in a bunch, I'll be in Nevada in a
couple of months.

Why wait? It'll save you a lot of the moronic posts you write in-
between the arthritic aches.

I said not to get those panties all tied up but you went ahead and
did it anyway. I expect it will take you a couple of months to
remember your real name.

>
> Now this is really and obvious lie. You previously stated you had
> your mythical mathematicians review Reids' proof. How many lies

is

> that now. Must be in double figures. You should check with your
mama before posting again.

Reid....as in who cares about Reid? dodo. And it wasn't
Reid's 'proof'--it was similar concepts written by others who

weren't

enthralled in gambling losses so much as to skew their theories.

Go back and read YOUR posts bozo.

>
> > How about proving to me that I cannot and have not won--like

you

> keep saying.
>
> I have never said that. One more lie. In fact, I have said just

the

> opposite. So, I guess that makes two more lies.

Do the words "liar" and "fraud" ring any bells??

Yep, you are a liar and a fraud. You state advantage play doesn't
work and your flat earth system does. All this to build up your
bloated ego. ONCE AGAIN, that makes you a liar and a fraud!

>
> Once again, so that your underfunctioning brain can understand.

It

is possible to be on the right side of the bell curve and win with

a

> negative system.

So on the other hand, your waffling on the issue now points to the
fact that I am not a liar and a fraud. Do you see why you look like

a

nut?

No waffling here little Robbie. If you could read above a 3rd grade
level you understand that.

That's why you need a mathematical evaluation to
> understand how any system will work for the general gambling
> population. I could care less how good or bad you do, I do care
that you are fostering a fraud in an attempt to build your ego.

I believe you are on a reverse ego trip. How many times does it

take

to get it through your fat head that I did not develop these
strategies for the gambling public.

Then remove them from your web site, never mention them in a book and
quit posting to forums stating advantage play doesn't work. But then
where would you get your ego fix?

Those who are piqued by it can
ask me any questions or for any advice, and the answers are always
the same. Everything surrounding this is clearly spelled out on my
site and in my Play Strategies numerous times throughout my site

and

in my articles. Take of the coke-bottle glasses, remember to take
your alzheimers medication, and read with some kind of

understanding

this time around.

It appears little Robbie has really got those panties in a huge
bunch. But then, that happens when liars continually get caught. YOUR
SYSTEM IS A LIE and a FRAUD!

>
If I ever saw a poster child for LOSER, you are IT.

Now we have to endure your typing of the word 'mama' over and over
again, instead of you showing you have any kind of intelligence
allowing you to be worthy of chatting with me.

I call 'em as I see them and anyone who's scared to use his real name
is clearly just a mama's boy.

I'm still waiting for
you to prove, by example, your mathematical prowess rather than
showing on and on what an Internet hack you are. Go ahead....prove
butt-wiping does exist on paper. Show me the calculations behind
the 'theory'.

And what theory would that be? If you mean expert play then both
winpoker and FVP are PROOF by example. But then I doubt you have any
concept what that means. You wouldn't know a real proof if it hit you
in the panties. But then Reids' proof is already an example of that.

>
> > More jealousy. GT: 35 years of plagiarism and immorality. GBC:

40

> > years of the same. What a genius you must be!!
> The proof is they ALLOW plagiarism and they hired you. Not much
else needs to be said. Let's see, how long has the Nat'l Enq. been
around?

Sounds like just another way of saying they're immoral as you said
earlier. GBC has me on their shelves right along with your Queen

and

Bob Dancer. GT put a column in every week by Elliott Fromme--right
there next to mine. Even though he was a mercy hiring, he
is 'allowed' to write the same nonsense you push that bores people

to

death. But GT & GBC both 'allow' varying points of view. the

Queen's,

Dancer's and Fromme's happens to be a theory--and mine reality. So
who do you think's more popular and believable....and truthful?

Boy, your ego must need another booster shot. Hasn't your mama been
telling little Robbie how great he is? Must you do it yourself? Seems
to me you're the ONLY one who's ever said anything good about you.
Tells me a lot.

>
> Sure you do, you travelled all the way to Minnesota to spy on me.
> Give me a break. You really are starting to panic. So, let's hear
> some of this info ...

If you knew more about me you'd know I don't have to 'travel' to

know

what I want to. I know what I need to, and if you tossed up a full
picture of yourself here

You want a picture of me and you're afraid to even write your name.
You are pathethic.

then everyone would know why you talk like a
weasel on a computer. It's guys like you that make me look good....

Now you're backing down. Must be those panties up around your neck.
Come on, if you know so much let's have it. Otherwise admit you were
lying once again.

>
> > > B. I don't have to get Mama's permission to say my real name.

Nope. I don't write it anywhere -- my own policy--even though it's
been all over vpfree and other places for years. You must be the

only

hack that didn't get it!

Hey, if you're going to challenge others for personal information
then you need to have the GUTs to come forth with your real name.
Policy? Yeah right, cowardice is a lot more accurate. You've shown
your true colors and they're all covered in a YELLOW slime.

> You seem to be stuck on butt-wiping. Is that how you scratch your
> head when attempting to sound intelligent?

No, it's how I'll rate you as a theorist once you supply anything
other than BS about your so-called knowledge.

Who cares how you rate anybody. You are such a LOSER. Nobody cares
what you think!

>
> And just to make it CLEAR, once again, to Dilberts' manager,
> Robbie. I don't have a theory. I use the proven technology of
> advantage play. That's expert play + comps + CB + BB + ... You've
> even stated you understand and USE expert play 90+% of the time.

Now,

>who's the idiot that keeps saying that THIS system doesn't work.

You'll have to explain this Dilbert--never heard of him or her.

And you claimed to have worked for corporate America. Sounds kind of
fishy to me.
  

What's this 'proven technology'?? Are you kookoo? I don't worry

about

what you're neurotic about--CB, BB, comps, and all the other

baloney

that runs your video poker life.

Well, I don't care a twit about your claims. It means ABSOLUTELY
nothing. Which is a pretty good description of you. And, if you don't
care about comps then why did you brag about you free flight just
this month? Could it be another lie ...

I play for profit and on my own
terms.

Good, then quit trying to sell your flat earth system as VALID. It's
a scam and you know it.

Your 'expert'play' is nothing more than common sense to me,
and I'm smart enough to know when not to use it.

If ever a more stupid thing was uttered ... and he doesn't even have
a clue.

If you want to be
reeled in and soaked dry by playing exactly as any casino manager
wants you to,

OK, show proof of this statement. Are these the same casino managers
that pulled out all the FPDW above .25 from the casino floors? And,
don't try the BS about increasing profits, because your statment
above indicated the high paybacks "reeled" us in. Another lie?

then that's why you're so jealous of my success. Go
ahead and chase those promotions like being led around by a pied
piper. All you'll do is keep the machines full for me.

Come on, babykins, show me proof your system has general
applicability. But then, you don't even have the guts to stand face
to face with me on this forum with your real name. You give the other
mamas' boys a bad name.

What happened to your claim I lied about my name? and my appearance?
Is little Robby backing off again? You don't know squat, do you!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

I said not to get those panties all tied up but you went ahead and
did it anyway. I expect it will take you a couple of months to
remember your real name.

I don't wear underwear.

> Do the words "liar" and "fraud" ring any bells??

Yep, you are a liar and a fraud. You state advantage play doesn't
work and your flat earth system does. All this to build up your
bloated ego. ONCE AGAIN, that makes you a liar and a fraud!

Oh, but I thought you said at least 7 times that I'm a liar & fraud
because there's no way I could win as I do, and that I'm defrauding
others in doing so. Better get your facts in order before trying to
adjust your words with me, Dicky. And....so-called 'advantage play'
is nothing more than addict hype - by you and the relatively few
others who sell it to other players.

> >
No waffling here little Robbie. If you could read above a 3rd grade
level you understand that.

All I can see is that you're a wannabee nut in the land of 10,000
geeks. Today it's this and tomorrow it's that.

Then remove them from your web site, never mention them in a book

and quit posting to forums stating advantage play doesn't work. But
then where would you get your ego fix?

So now you want to put the clamps on freedom of speech. And here's a
flash, Einstein....so-called 'advantage play' doesn't work, and you
know it. Your theory is a bunch of BS because it applies to robots
and not people. You know that too, but the hope and wishing that it
would work is your own private fantasy. At least your heroes steal
money from others with the falsification and sensationalizing of that
stupid system. All you are is a wannabee.

It appears little Robbie has really got those panties in a huge
bunch. But then, that happens when liars continually get caught.

YOUR SYSTEM IS A LIE and a FRAUD!

First, read about my panties again, and then explain yourself a
little better next time.

And what theory would that be? If you mean expert play then both
winpoker and FVP are PROOF by example. But then I doubt you have

any concept what that means. You wouldn't know a real proof if it hit
you in the panties. But then Reids' proof is already an example of
that.

More RS education for the Musty: You're neurotic about proving
EVERYTHING before you believe it can actually be an event. With my
butt-wipe example, I've proven you to be as dumb as they come....an
Internet hack. We know butt-wiping takes place everywhere every day
(I can personally produce an average of 3 examples a day if you'd
like to witness it). Yet you--the wannabee Mr. Wizard--will not
believe anything you read about or actually see unless it can also be
mathematically proven on paper. So in typical hypocritical terms for
you, you know it works but now you can't PROVE it works on paper, so
you look stupider by the minute. Now please give me a moment or two
as I listen to everyone laugh at you.

Boy, your ego must need another booster shot. Hasn't your mama been
telling little Robbie how great he is? Must you do it yourself?

Seems to me you're the ONLY one who's ever said anything good about
you. Tells me a lot.

In other words, you agree with what I said. That's you when you can't
respond.

> then everyone would know why you talk like a
> weasel on a computer. It's guys like you that make me look

good....

Now you're backing down. Must be those panties up around your neck.
Come on, if you know so much let's have it. Otherwise admit you

were lying once again.

I'm looking better by the minute.

Hey, if you're going to challenge others for personal information
then you need to have the GUTs to come forth with your real name.
Policy? Yeah right, cowardice is a lot more accurate. You've shown
your true colors and they're all covered in a YELLOW slime.

Let's get back to the fact that you are the only one on vpfree that
doesn't have it. And you call yourself half as intelligent as me? And
what's with the 'real name' thing anyway--are you going to have
anxiety attacks, or will your fat wiggle uncontrollably without it?

Who cares how you rate anybody. You are such a LOSER. Nobody cares
what you think!

I think YOU care.

> You'll have to explain this Dilbert--never heard of him or her.

And you claimed to have worked for corporate America. Sounds kind

of fishy to me.

Yup, and the Gov't. too. We ate computer programmers for a snack.

  
Well, I don't care a twit about your claims. It means ABSOLUTELY
nothing. Which is a pretty good description of you. And, if you

don't care about comps then why did you brag about you free flight
just this month? Could it be another lie ...

Here's the difference, McFly. I don't use a card everywhere because I
don't make it a priority to remember, and I will not stand in stupid
white-trash slot club lines. When i use them I take whatever comes,
and I don't care what shows up. Just now I got a $145 cash coupon
from the Rio, and I'll cash it next time I'm there. If I misplace it
I couldn't care less. On the other hand, you are controlled by
everything slot club and you know it. I'm beyond all that BS, and
it's just another reason why I'm so successful when so-
called 'advantage' players are not.

> Your 'expert'play' is nothing more than common sense to me,
> and I'm smart enough to know when not to use it.

If ever a more stupid thing was uttered ... and he doesn't even

have a clue.

Gee, the machine deals cards and I hold the best ones. Wow--REAL
tough stuff. I call that common sense. Then I hit the button and more
cards pop out. What SKILL!! You 'advantage players' really got
something there.....Wanna patent application?

> If you want to be reeled in and soaked dry by playing exactly as

any casino manager wants you to,

OK, show proof of this statement.

Just look at how YOU play--proof in the mirror. Then go to any double
points promo and see all the 'advantage-play' idiots who write on
vpfree and vpmail that get roped in. I've watched these fish more
than they know. It's pathetic, and it's what addicts do.

Are these the same casino managers

that pulled out all the FPDW above .25 from the casino floors? And,
don't try the BS about increasing profits, because your statment
above indicated the high paybacks "reeled" us in. Another lie?

The high paybacks are from the promotions. Only fools go after such
nonsense. FPDW brings in the stupidest looking players in town, and
no casino manager could endure the constant parade of kooks. That's
why Sam's Town sticks the games out near where all the low-lifes hang
out. Of course reason #1 is as i told you that the casino managers
told me, but you can't take the truth.

Come on, babykins,

What's a babykins? Is that a term in Minnesota?

Show me proof your system has general applicability.

1. Come on down and see the new pool going in my daughter's back yard.
2. I'll give you a ride in the new Dodge Hemi Magnum LV bought for me.

How's that for applicability???

What happened to your claim I lied about my name? and my appearance?

You'r name is correct. And you know you're a fat-ass. Now everyone
does.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> > Do the words "liar" and "fraud" ring any bells??
>
> Yep, you are a liar and a fraud. You state advantage play doesn't
> work and your flat earth system does. All this to build up your
> bloated ego. ONCE AGAIN, that makes you a liar and a fraud!

Oh, but I thought you said at least 7 times that I'm a liar & fraud
because there's no way I could win as I do, and that I'm defrauding
others in doing so.

Nope, your imagination is running wild. I've indicated your continual
lying calls your wins into question, but that's it. I've also said
some people WILL win playing with a negative expectation. Remember
that bell curve Mr. MBS?

Finally, one more time, and at least a zillion times now, I don't
care if you've won or not. It has nothing to do with the topic at
hand.

Better get your facts in order before trying to
adjust your words with me, Dicky. And....so-called 'advantage play'
is nothing more than addict hype - by you and the relatively few
others who sell it to other players.

That's exactly what I mean, you just lied one more time. You are such
a loser.

> > >
> No waffling here little Robbie. If you could read above a 3rd

grade

> level you understand that.

All I can see is that you're a wannabee nut in the land of 10,000
geeks. Today it's this and tomorrow it's that.

Now, your backing off again with a bunch of nonsense. I made a
factual statement and you blubber away.

>
> Then remove them from your web site, never mention them in a book
and quit posting to forums stating advantage play doesn't work. But
then where would you get your ego fix?

So now you want to put the clamps on freedom of speech.

Nope, you asked about being a liar and I responded with how you can
stop being a called a liar. Freedom of speech has nothing to do with
it, honesty has everything to do with it. If you want to put
something on your website about using a progression just make sure to
indicate that playing on negative machines using the progression will
not change the overall expectation. There's no doubt a progession
will lead to more session wins. You can put that on your web site as
well. You should, however, warn people that it can also lead to a few
SIGNIFICANT loses.

And here's a
flash, Einstein....so-called 'advantage play' doesn't work, and you
know it.

See, here you go again LYING through your teeth without a thread of
evidence to back you up. YOU ARE A LIAR AND A FRAUD!

Your theory is a bunch of BS because it applies to robots
and not people.

More LIES. Where's your proof, little Robbie? You have none and you
know it! You are such an idiot and a coward. It's obvious why you
won't use your real name.

You know that too, but the hope and wishing that it
would work is your own private fantasy. At least your heroes steal
money from others with the falsification and sensationalizing of

that

stupid system. All you are is a wannabee.

Come on yellow belly, if you're so smart give out your real name. All
you are is a bunch of meaningless words, a coward and worthless waste
of oxygen.

> And what theory would that be? If you mean expert play then both
> winpoker and FVP are PROOF by example. But then I doubt you have
any concept what that means. You wouldn't know a real proof if it

hit

you in the panties. But then Reids' proof is already an example of
that.

More RS education for the Musty: You're neurotic about proving
EVERYTHING before you believe it can actually be an event. With my
butt-wipe example, I've proven you to be as dumb as they come....an
Internet hack.

Looks to me like you don't know how to prove anything. Wait, you have
proved what a coward you are. That's it. Little mamas' boy keeps
trying but the fact is everytime you submit a post without your real
name you keep proving your yellow colors all over again. That must be
the "butt-wipe" example you keep talking about?

We know butt-wiping takes place everywhere every day
(I can personally produce an average of 3 examples a day if you'd
like to witness it).

I can see you scratching your head now ...

Yet you--the wannabee Mr. Wizard--will not
believe anything you read
about or actually see unless it can also be
mathematically proven on paper.

I believe SOME of what I read and I believe MOST of what I see. And,
if a problem submits itself to mathematical examination (like VP),
then I DO look for a mathematical proof of any claim. That's why I
know as a FACT that your progressive system is a FRAUD.

So in typical hypocritical terms for
you, you know it works but now you can't PROVE it works on paper,

What is "it" you keep referring to, this mysterious "it". You never
define "it". Could "it" be the fact that you are a coward and a
fraud? Then, you do a real good job of proving "it" every time you
post.

>
> Boy, your ego must need another booster shot. Hasn't your mama

been

> telling little Robbie how great he is? Must you do it yourself?
Seems to me you're the ONLY one who's ever said anything good about
you. Tells me a lot.

In other words, you agree with what I said. That's you when you

can't

respond.

I think everyone, including you, knows EXACTLY what I mean.

>
> > then everyone would know why you talk like a
> > weasel on a computer. It's guys like you that make me look
good....
>
> Now you're backing down. Must be those panties up around your

neck.

> Come on, if you know so much let's have it. Otherwise admit you
were lying once again.

I'm looking better by the minute.

By dodging once more? I don't think so. If you weren't so stupid
you'd realize you look exactly like the gutless wonder you are.

>
> Hey, if you're going to challenge others for personal information
> then you need to have the GUTs to come forth with your real name.
> Policy? Yeah right, cowardice is a lot more accurate. You've

shown

> your true colors and they're all covered in a YELLOW slime.

Let's get back to the fact that you are the only one on vpfree that
doesn't have it.

There's that mysterious "it" again. Could you be a little LESS
specific?

And you call yourself half as intelligent as me?

No, I'd never do that? But, I suspect you're no more than "half as
intelligent" as you think you are.

And
what's with the 'real name' thing anyway--are you going to have
anxiety attacks, or will your fat wiggle uncontrollably without it?

Little Robbie, the coward, is trying hard to dodge around the real
issue, but he is smack in the middle of the target. Must be that
yellow slime that follows you around has impacted all of your senses.
Provide your real name, mamas boy, or get lost.

>
> Who cares how you rate anybody. You are such a LOSER. Nobody

cares

> what you think!

I think YOU care.

Not in the least. Only someone with your immense ego could ever think
otherwise.

>
> > You'll have to explain this Dilbert--never heard of him or her.
>
> And you claimed to have worked for corporate America. Sounds kind
of fishy to me.

Yup, and the Gov't. too. We ate computer programmers for a snack.

Is this an intelligent reply or what? And, you still have no clue who
Dilbert is ... Your FORMER, fellow employees must have continually
had huge laughs about you. Did Scott Adams work for you?

>
> Well, I don't care a twit about your claims. It means ABSOLUTELY
> nothing. Which is a pretty good description of you. And, if you
don't care about comps then why did you brag about you free flight
just this month? Could it be another lie ...
>
Here's the difference, McFly. I don't use a card everywhere because

I

don't make it a priority to remember, and I will not stand in

stupid

white-trash slot club lines.

The bigot in you is showing. And, if you were an advantage player you
could get in the VIP lines.

When i use them I take whatever comes,
and I don't care what shows up. Just now I got a $145 cash coupon
from the Rio, and I'll cash it next time I'm there. If I misplace

it

I couldn't care less.

One more example of your stupidity. Or, I suspect, another lie. Oh,
by the way, the Rio has called me on the phone with several free
offers. It's called casino marketing.

> > Your 'expert'play' is nothing more than common sense to me,
> > and I'm smart enough to know when not to use it.
>
> If ever a more stupid thing was uttered ... and he doesn't even
have a clue.

Gee, the machine deals cards and I hold the best ones. Wow--REAL
tough stuff. I call that common sense. Then I hit the button and

more

cards pop out. What SKILL!! You 'advantage players' really got
something there.....Wanna patent application?

OK, are you up for a test? I'll give you ten hands and you tell me
the "best ones" to hold? Oh wait, the "best ones" means something
entirely different to you. They are whatever little Robbie decides to
hold. Your so-called "special plays".

>
> > If you want to be reeled in and soaked dry by playing exactly

as

any casino manager wants you to,
>
> OK, show proof of this statement.

Just look at how YOU play--proof in the mirror.

Once again, when asked for any supporting evidence you just dodge the
question. It's another reason why everyones knows you are the biggest
liar and coward around. Come on, little Robbie, you made a statement,
now either prove it, admit that you lied, or run back to your mama
crying.

> Are these the same casino managers
> that pulled out all the FPDW above .25 from the casino floors?

And,

> don't try the BS about increasing profits, because your statment
> above indicated the high paybacks "reeled" us in. Another lie?

The high paybacks are from the promotions.

That has nothing to do with what you said. No mention of promotion in
your original statement. You are such a joke. You can't even keep a
train of thought for two posts. So, why did they pull all the >.25
FPDW if advantage play doesn't work?

Only fools go after such
nonsense. FPDW brings in the stupidest looking players in town, and
no casino manager could endure the constant parade of kooks.

Is this an example of your best, most intelligent reply? I'd love to
talk with the casino manager who said this. Please pass on his/her
name. Of course, you can't since this is just another lie. You know
as well as I do that casino managers could care less how anyone looks.

That's
why Sam's Town sticks the games out near where all the low-lifes

hang

out. Of course reason #1 is as i told you that the casino managers
told me, but you can't take the truth.

Now you're trying to back off, while once again showing what a bigot
you are. You know as well as I do that your original statement is
just another lie perpetrated by you in an attempt to make youself
look good. Your ego traps you again.

Tell you what, I'll meet you at Sams' Town in 2 months and you can
introduce me to this casino manager and I can ask him/her directly.

>
> Come on, babykins,

What's a babykins? Is that a term in Minnesota?

It's a term for little sissies like you who don't have the balls to
use their REAL name when making ridiculous claims. So, just what is
your real name, babykins.

>Show me proof your system has general applicability.

1. Come on down and see the new pool going in my daughter's back

yard.

2. I'll give you a ride in the new Dodge Hemi Magnum LV bought for

me.

You don't have clue what "general applicability" means, do you? You
couldn't have shown your immense studipity any better than you did in
your response.

How's that for applicability???

Perfect.

> What happened to your claim I lied about my name? and my

appearance?

You'r name is correct.

But you said a few posts ago it wasn't. And you want people to
believe the BS you write? You are such a liar and a hypocrite on top
of being a worthless coward.

And you know you're a fat-ass. Now everyone does.

Because little Robbie, the proven liar, said it? Get serious. You dig
yourself in deeper and deeper while hiding behind your mamas' apron.

How much longer will you go on showing us what a moron you are ...

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

Dick, have you even PLAYED a hand of video poker on a REAL machine
in your life? Or do you just sit at home masturbating to Winpoker
and salivating at the thought of the next useless rambling pointless
garbage columns from Dancer and Jean Scott?

Nope, you asked about being a liar and I responded with how you

can

stop being a called a liar. Freedom of speech has nothing to do

with

it, honesty has everything to do with it. If you want to put
something on your website about using a progression just make sure

to

indicate that playing on negative machines using the progression

will

not change the overall expectation. There's no doubt a progession
will lead to more session wins. You can put that on your web site

as

well. You should, however, warn people that it can also lead to a

few

···

SIGNIFICANT loses.

Sounds pretty familar. Could this be another little sissy hiding
behind a false name, or is this the original, #1 coward? Only time
will tell.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "bonuspokergod"
<bonuspokergod@y...> wrote:

···

Dick, have you even PLAYED a hand of video poker on a REAL machine
in your life? Or do you just sit at home masturbating to Winpoker
and salivating at the thought of the next useless rambling pointless
garbage columns from Dancer and Jean Scott?