--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> Yep, that same bell curve that causes electricity to flow through
> wires. You want to dispute the bell curve? Let's have it. I can
come up with hundreds more great examples of the bell curve and
its'
> applicability to every day life. What have you got to dispute it?
> Want to talk about exit polls again?The bell curve is only a crutch
No, it's a fact of basic statistical math. It's not good, bad or
indifferent. It just is. By the way, exit polls are not an example of
a bell curve. They are an examples of statistical sampling methods
and require a much deeper understanding than a simple bell curve. I
just wanted to see if you knew the difference.
for your endless theories about how
you dream video poker should be played by yourself. It's no
different
than the theory Scott, Hughes, Wong, Dancer and Paymar dangle in
front of weak players in order to take money from them. That scam
is
why I'm here, and my progress is what bothers you no end.
No, the reason I'm here is to expose YOU as the liar and fraud you
are. And, I'm doing a fine job.
>
> > > Finally, one more time, and at least a zillion times now, I
> don't care if you've won or not. It has nothing to do with the
topic at hand.Talk about lying....You're big problem here is that I win when you
cannot -- how I actually play the game and win when you only do so
on
paper while you lose in the casinos. It bothers you that you have
to
scrape together dollars from whatever means possible and only make
a
few trips a year to Nv., when I own the place.
And what property would that be. Cowards 'r us?
> >
> > The topic at hand is in fact my record
>
> No, it's not. You WANT to make it your record, and I could care
less as I've said many times. The topic is whether your bogus
system
can turn a negative expectation into a positive one. Little Robbie
is
now panicing bigtime.
What bothers you is that my system HAS turned it into a positive
expectation as proven by me with piles of historical data.
Personal data means NOTHING. It is proof of NOTHING, other than your
obviously enlarged ego. Let's hear you say it again. "I'm a VP guru,
I'm a star, I'm a ..." It's very clear what your motives are. And
the fact you won't come forward with your real name pretty much sums
up what you REALLY are.
>
> > No one cares whether or not you care if I
> > win or not.
>
> Then you shouldn't have brought it up.Now you're a crybaby. Your #1 care in this world is about me and
how
I do what I do. But it really isn't all that bad for you, because
it
gives an old man reason to live.
There's that ego again. ROTFL.
>
> > You're the one with a zillion problems to solve in that
> > neurotic mind of yours. I'm happy getting ready to go out back
for a swim and a few minutes in the jacuzzi, and then packing for
tomorrow's trip to New Orleans.
>
> You're so predictable. How many subject changes is this now? It
must be real tough knowing you've completely lost this debate. Is
that why you won't post your name?It's nice seeing how jealous you are of me once again. Keep it
coming.
OK. You're so predictable. How many subject changes is this now? It
must be real tough knowing you've completely lost this debate. Is
that why you won't post your name?
>
> If you must know, I had a nice day working outside in near
perfect
> temperatures. This evening my wife and I went out to a nice
> restaurant where I had a great salad, broiled walleye and cheddar
> mashed potatoes.I can whip that stuff up with one hand tied behind my back.
Kind of like your gambling systems.
Hold the
cheese though.
I doubt you have any clue how to prepare Walleye. But then who really
cares?
>
> Since you know nothing of my gambling results this is simply just
> another lie on your part and another example of a mamas' boy who
> won't reveal his real name. Your panic increases ...Um, I believe you blab that you've got the game beaten because you
play the way the gurus tell you to (and the fact that you've also
bought all their junk so you're obligated to say that). I've simply
interpreted your drivel.
More lies from the "liar guru". And where is your proof of the above
statement? Nowhere to be found. But, since you're interested, I make
my own strategy cards for OEJs which is my primary game. I do own
winpoker. Got it before it was BDPW and I use it for the other games
I play. So, tell me again just who I'm obligated to? The
only "drivel" I see is your last statement.
>
> > That was so good I'll put it in again. All I can see is that
you're a wannabee nut in the land of 10,000 geeks. Today it's this
and tomorrow it's that.> Guess again little Robbie. Your system has been proven invalid
and
> yet you persist. That makes you a liar and a fraud.
Proven invalid by whom?
Reid.
Anyone contact me for my results and
historical review?
Nobody cares about your results except you. Unless you play as much a
the millions of other gamblers ...
Don't start with what's supposed to happen on
paper again. That makes you look increasingly stupid.
... and you still believe the earth is flat. You've said it before a
zillion times. Doesn't change the facts.
>
> When you ridicule anyone without using your real name then you
are,
> plain and simple, a complete coward. I'm perfectly happy knowing
I
> have the balls to state exactly what I think about you using my
real name for everyone to see. So, if you ever grow a set please
let
the rest of us know. Until then you better take some more of your
panic meds.Like you're a big cheese for criticizing me on the Internet!
Bigger than you. I use my real name while you wallow in your
cowardice.
Gee, how
it hurts. For what i make with vp, I'll take it a million times
over.
Keep it coming, Minnesota Fats!! ...
I will little Robbie. It must be a great life, I mean having to live
in that yellow slime all the time, it's no wonder you're such a loser.
>
> You're more than welcome to post you own results. If you consider
> that proof then you should also post a money back guarantee that
> anyone who uses your system will also win and you will cover
their
> loses. Put your money where your mouth is!
I'll tell you what. Get Paymar, Dancer, or any other quack to do it
retro-actively on their system (one that you swear by) and I'll do
the same. That's a tough one Dicky, so take your time.
You're the one that's come forward and stated advantage play doesn't
work and you have a better system. (Go back and reread your first
post in the thread.) If you had any confidence in what you're saying
you'd WANT to back it up. I guess your flat earth system isn't all
that you've said it was. You are such an obvious coward. And, did I
mention liar and fraud!
>
> > Name a player who won't agree that advantage play is a loser.
>
> I think a couple of them already posted here and you called them
> names. Just to go back and reread the last few months posts. But,
> then I don't care about any advantage players results either. The
> topic is general applicability of your flat earth system vs.
> advantage play. So far, your system has failed miserably. It's
been
> proven invalid yet you continue to babble on and on.
I said name a player, not to tell me to read something. You can't
even follow directions, which proves you're lazy to go with being a
fool.
I guess that must mean you can't read. Or, you don't know how. Can't
even go back to the archives. Who's the lazy/stupid one? Little
Robbie!
>
> That's right. No one ever said you needed to play perfectly to be
an advantage player. Let me hear you say real humans can't play
> TicTacToe either.That's the standard response whenever I challenge the big heads on
this one. In articles they say you have to play perfectly if you
want
to win.
I've never said that and I'm the one in THIS discussion. Another
obvious attempt to waylay the discussion from your fradulent system.
When I come along they waffle to "near-perfectly"
Now you're getting it. I never thought you'd understand.
and when
people say they can't win they say "but gee, you didn't practice
enough".
That may or may not be true and, of course, you ignore those who have
won lots of money. But how does this prove your flat earth system
works? It doesn't, it's just your cowards' way out of discussing your
fradulent system.
>
> Where's your supporting evidence? Nowhere. You are such a moron
to
> even bring up "applications in mathematics". That's exactly what
VP
> is!
HAHA! That's exactly what you WISH it were. It's a game, dummy.
And a game, like TicTacToe, that can be examined with 100% accuracy
with todays' computers. So once more, for the obviously slow witted
like little Robbie, it IS an "application in mathematics". Were you
the one who said a computer could never beat a chess master?
>
That must be the "butt-wipe" example you keep talking about?Speaking of that, are you ever going to try for an answer? Or has
the
moose got your tongue on that one??
I did answer but your embarrassingly slow mind continues to miss it.
Reids' proof shows your flat earth system can NEVER work.
> >
>
> ROTFL.What does that mean?
Amoung other things, that you're an idiot.
>
>> > You're only an old fool who likes to argue. You don't believe
a
> thing unless you can prove it on paper, and you know it. VP has
no
place in your math exam except for the most neurotic of players,
those who fraudulently sell it to others, or wannabees.This is sooo good I'll leave it in one more time! Your response
included some old man nonsense about tictacdo. You still play that?
Occasionally with my granddaughter. And, it's a great example of the
falacy of your flat earth logic. You want everyone to think VP is so
tough it can't be played with ample efficiency. You might as well say
the same thing about TicTacToe. VP just takes a little more work
(except maybe FPDW).
>
> Your play strategy has already been proven wrong by Reids' proof,
did you miss that? I thought the many, many times I mentioned
Reids'
> proof would be enough.
Reid who---and did he review my strategies?
He took a general approach that covers your strategies and any other
progressive strategy as a subset. He proved that NO progressive
system based on uneven payoffs (your increasing denoms) can make a
negative game positive. However, you stated in an earlier post that
you reviewed his paper. I guess that was just another lie. Oh, and
don't forget your 3 mythical math guys that also reviewed it.
>
> > >
> > > > Yup, and the Gov't. too. We ate computer programmers for a
> snack.Is this an intelligent reply or what? And, you still have
no
clue who Dilbert is ... Your FORMER, fellow employees must have
continually had huge laughs about you. Did Scott Adams work for you?In large organizations (private or Gov't.) the geekish programmers
(aka 'computer fairies) were the laughing stock of the joints.
Sure they were. And, could this be another famous RS bigotted reply?
Yep.
> >
> > Who's Scott Adams? He often demonstates your intelligence when
he
publishes.
No, once again "WHO is Scott Adams....not WHAT does he do? Now you
see why programmers were always walked all over. They tried to duck
questions but always got caught.
No, I'm just having way to much fun with this one. ROTFL. Maybe you
should check with all your friend/s.
>
> > >
> > > The bigot in you is showing. And, if you were an advantage
player you could get in the VIP lines.So-called 'advantage players' are, on the whole, a low-class bunch
who try to follow other people's fabricated on-paper dreams inside
casinos. Next time you're in one of your revered locals joints in
LV,
wait before you rush to sit and play and take a good look around.
Not
only are the theoretically >100% machines being played by such a
pathetic-looking bunch of life's leftovers--most of them ARE! And
the
VIP lines? All those are for is the bigger losers and addicts, who
like to brag to others about all the 'free stuff' they got from
everywhere they play. Common sense says it all.
Yes, Rob Singer is a bigot.
> >
> You are the biggest bigot I have ever come across. It must be
that
> inferiority complex. You generalize everyone into a class and
then
> ridicule the class. This is trait most often associated with low
> intelligence. But then, that's been pretty obvious all along.Read my lips Dicky. LV has, proportionately, more social problems
than any other place on earth.
I can feel another generalization coming on ...
Locals make that up if it somehow
passed you by. Smoking, drinking, overeating, drinking too much--
and
video poker all go hand-in-hand. How many fat-asses do you see
smoking and playing vp? Check it out. No self-respect for
themselves
equates to no discipline at the machines. You disagree?
Yep, another generalization. I will agree around 2/3 of the people
are overweight. Wait a sec, that's now the average in the US.
Then you're
the same fool who can't figure anything else out here.
I can figure this out. You are a complete bigot.
>
> Actually, I told them I wasn't interested.You brute you. I guess you told them.
Just the facts man. Something you would know very little about.
>
> You mean to say the pay table actually means something to you?That's an inconsistent statement from someone who reads my columns
regularly.
Nope, the only one I've ever read is the one referenced in a previous
post by Bonus...Rob...Tom...whatever. Why would I want to when you
show what an egotistical bigot and coward you really are right here
on this forum.
> > Let's see you prove that butt-wiping exists pops. In fact, show
us
> > the mathematical difference between the kind of toilet seat
that's
> > larger with an opening up front, and those teeny little circles
> that
> > they install in dumps like Fiesta Rancho, Az. Charlie's, El
Cortez,-
> -
> > you know, the joints so-called 'advantage' players are reeled
into
> > all the time.
>
> Just admit you lied or provide supporting evidence. Your babble
is
> showing your level of panic.
Oops! Guess you can't.
Can't prove that you babble? You just did it for me.
>
> When discussing advantage play, little Robbie said "If you want
to
be reeled in and soaked dry by playing exactly as any casino
manager
> wants you to". When I asked about FPDWs being pulled out of all
the
> casinos, little Robbie the coward, stuttered "The high paybacks
are
> from the promotions". So, once again you are caught in a lie.
Huh?? You're being a kook again. You're precious >100% paybacks ARE
mostly from promotions today and not the pay tables. Are you here?
Hello!
Not a surprising reply from an idiot like you. Do you always act
really stupid when completely caught in a lie? Where's those casino
managers now? Where are all the FPDW? Where is an intelligent
response from little Robbie? Nowhere to be found!
>
You know as well as I do that casino managers could care less how
anyone looks.Yeah they do. The weider, the stupider--the better. They love to
see
fat-asses plop into the chairs, and they love fat women even
better.
And those who smoke make their day. Not to mention the incessant
drinking habits of most of them.
But, you stated last week that the casino managers didn't like them?
Can't you remember what you said last week? And, you want people to
believe you're always truthful. What a crock!
> >
And, what is this mystery casino managers name?I'll tell you what. Since you can't seem to figure out who's who,
i'll let your Tums do the work as you get anxiety attacks over
names.
You're a self-proclaimed smart guy Dick, so let's see that in-
action
for a change.
In other words, you have no idea. Just what I thought, another lie.
>
> > > Tell you what, I'll meet you at Sams' Town in 2 months and
you
> can introduce me to this casino manager and I can ask him/her
> directly.Hey dufus--Sam's Town still HAS the machines!
Was this response to another question and you misplaced it or have
you completely lost your composure? Or, are you saying Sams Town has
.25 FPDW.
> > >
> Right after you post your real name for all to see. Oh, and I'll
take $60 on that 10000:1 bet you just offered. I'll send my $60 to
Tom if you'll do the same with your $600,000 (I believe that's what
you've indicated you've won with your system).Is $60 ALL you can afford while feeling invincible? Here's a hint:
You don't have much money, and you'll lose that bet.
No, it's all I need to take ALL of your money. So, are we on? Let's
set a date right now. How about 10/21/04 at Sam's Town. We can meet
anywhere (or anytime) you'd like. Just make sure to send Tom your
$600K ahead of time.
>
> > For some reason, I just got a woody when you said that. Are you
> sure your daughter or wife didn't write it?
>
> ROTFL. I love it when you panic.Yeah, but how does your wife feel about it........??
Let's see if I get this straight. You believe I'm a crusty old man
and you get a woody over my wife whose pretty close to me in age.
Need I say more? Do you spend a lot of time at graveyards getting
your kicks? Probably the only place you can ...
>
> All I can say is "Perfect". I can't believe you didn't entirely
snip this "perfect" example of your stupidity.Now don't be changing the subject again. I can't feel the love
from 'love it".
If I did change the subject, then let me refresh you. You were the
moron who came up with the idiotic short term examples when I asked
for "general applicability". You seem to want everyone to know you
have no clue what the difference is. I have no problem pointing it
out over and over. Perfect!
···
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote: