--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:
> > > > > The polls are a cross section of the voters. There is
> > NO "silent
> > > > > majority" when it comes to polls. This sounds exactly
like
> your
> > > own
> > > > > views on VP. Ignore the facts and make up idiotic
fantasies.
> > You
> > > > > gotta love it ...
> > > >
> > > > Doing your best to deny again....this time the slient
majority
> > > > throughout the country.
> > >
> > > ROTFLMAO. Explain how one entire cross section of voters just
> > happens
> > > to avoid the pollsters. Are you really this naive?
> >
> > So you're content with a 'poll' of 1500 people from a baseline
of
> > over a hundred million voters??
>
> Of course, it is a science you know. Error rates are usually in
the
> 3% range.
No wonder you like the polls when the people they happen to poll
favor the liberals.
Lie. Any poll that demonstrated an inability to correctly predict the
topic would soon fade away.
Saying you accept what a piddly 1500 have to say
is indicative of what 115,000,000 vote for is just the kind of
false
security that the dems. have lost with in the last 2 elections.
I bet little Robbie had a different take when the polls showed GWB
leading going into the last election.
>
> > You idiots couldn't handle the truth
> > of how the silent majority voted in the last 2 elections, and
you
> > still can't handle it now. That's why you lead a sour life over
> this.
> > It's your own fault!
>
> The polls were very accurate in the last election and GWB's
approval
> rating was high. Now, it is a completely different story. The
truth
> has finally reached the majority of middle Americans and they
don't
> like it. You should understand the effect the truth has ... it
has
> made a fool out of you right here on this forum.
Lying again to feel good I see. GWB barely won the last elections,
and the polls showed he should have lost easily beforehand.
The late polls showed it was basically a toss up with a large number
of undecideds. It was the way these undecided voters went that
carried the election for GWB. However, in the case of approval
ratings there are very few without an opinion.
And
your 'scientific polls' have always earmarked those in the big US
cities in the states that vote Democratic.
The polls attempt to find a accurate cross section. Oh, and guess
what, there are plenty of Republicans in big cities, especially the
suburbs.
The undeniable truth you
toss around has shown you to be humbled at least a dozen times here
in the past few weeks
LMAO. More hollow words.
....from your weaseling away from the bets to
your tapdancing around how you got the mystery info on my play
strategy to run those useless simulations on.
Everyone can see you won't face me in tennis and bowling. I have
called that one right from the start. As for your system, the clear
fact you would not face Fezzik with 4-1 odds in your favor is more
than enough evidence that you have been lying about everything.
>
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > they're hardly what actual events are to the
> > Kennedys.
> > > > > > > Greatness
> > > > > > > > > > survives....and a great man GWB certainly is.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I now understand why you love GWB so much. You're
> both
> > > > proven
> > > > > > > > liars. Birds of a feather ...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And how else could anyone respond as their shorts
begin
> > to
> > > > > > > tighten....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I can hear little Robbie chirping up a flat tune
right
> now.
> > > You
> > > > > > > really have no worldly sense whatsoever. You gotta
love
> > it ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If not having a clue as to what that means equates to
your
> > > > > rendition
> > > > > > of having 'no wordly sense', sign me up!
> > > > >
> > > > > You "signed up" long ago when you decided your fantasies
> would
> > > > become
> > > > > the truth of your life. They have words for this ...
> paranoid,
> > > > > delusional and narcissistic. Robbie's life in a nutshell.
> > > >
> > > > While you got off the subject again (wavering, oh wavering
> again)
> > > and
> > > > it's well known your stated views of me are based on my
> notoriety
> > >
> > > Well known by whom? You aren't well known and my views of you
are
> > > based on one thing ... your constant insistence that
mathematics
> is
> > > not valid for VP while playing a progression on negative
machines
> > > will turn a negative expectation game into a positive one.
> > Although,
> > > I will have to admit your penchant for lying is getting
better
> > known
> > > all the time.
> >
> > Every time you babble that baloney you make me more and more
> famous.
>
> Nope. The truth only makes you look impotent.
In case you haven't noticed yet, those whom you want to believe I
look 'impotent' to don't seem to be coming out of the woodwork
supporting your upside-down logic.
Da plane, da plane.
And every time one comes on siding
with my ideas you go into a crybaby tirade. Seems to me you're not
able to handle the truth so well after all!
As I've said many times, there will always be some folks looking for
an easy solution. "There's a sucker born every minute." That's why
con men flourish in our society. All you have to do is see that Kevin
Trudeau has made millions, 1-20 people fall for phishing scams, etc.
It is very telling that NO ONE has come on here supporting your
viewpoint and been willing to debate the facts.
>
> > But what i like best is how dumb you make yourself look. Sort
of
a
> > reverse 'Revenge of the Nerd".
>
> RIV at his best.
Another loss for words. When you get stuck you certainly don't hide
it.
RIV.
>
> > >
> > > > and
> > > > your 'hide behind the computer' geekiness as well as video
> poker
> > > > failure, I'll take this opportunity once again to say "Like
> > Father,
> > > > Like Son". Ted Kennedy is a murderer, and his son is a
drunken
> > > fool.
> > >
> > > I think it was actually prescription drugs, but neither is
> > excuseable.
> > >
> > > > Both came out with the exact same litany of "I didn't
really
> mean
> > > it
> > > > and i promise to do better" when all they represent is the
> family
> > > of
> > > > thugs who've been hiding behind Kennedy money forever. Too
bad
> > > truth
> > > > catches up with these idiots...as it will you...and has
cursed
> > that
> > > > wasted family almost out of existence. God Bless the great
GWB!
> > >
> > > Did he sneeze? When the total number of lost lives based on
lies
> is
> > > totaled up ... GWB will win hands down.
> >
> > As least you have sense about the Kennedys. 'Lives lost' in the
war
> > will be remembered for sacrafices for democracy and freedom.
>
> Yes, but the fact they were unnecessary will be GWB's legacy.
That stupid statement proves you are un-American and couldn't care
less about those who've given their lives for freedom.
Nope. You just offered up the ONLY "un-American" statement. You'd
love to stifle the open debate about our reasons for going to war
that cost thousands of lives. That is TRULY the bottem of the barrel.
You WANT GWB's
legacy to be one of question when you know it won't.
No. I KNOW there won't be any questions. He will go down as one of
the worst presidents ever.
You are unable
to visualize the attacks on this country that would have occurred
had
he not shown courage and greatness in the war on terror.
Da plane, da plane. It has been proven beyond any doubt that there
was no connection between terrorists and Sadam. The Iraq war has had
the exact opposite effect of enlisting more terrorists and crippling
our search for OBL.
But it's
fools like you who will always protest for the sake of protesting
just because of leftover election sour grapes. You have no
direction
or vision. Only criticizm. Just like with your itch over my
strategy
and win record. Bottom feeders for sure.
If you weren't already demonstrating enough idiotic viewpoints, you
then try to tie in VP results with politics. ROTFLMAO. Robbie
appently believes ALL VP players that voted for GWB also win money in
casinos. This is hilarious. Boy, Robbie, you sure have a knack for
stupid statements.
>
> > You mock
> > that, and you don't deserve to be protected by the truth.
>
> Just the facts, as usual. Sounds like you would have supported
Hitler
> if you lived in WWII era Germany.
I stand by GWB in the war because I know the facts behind it and
they
are real.
Lie. Even those INSIDE the administation admit they were wrong. Of
course, they try to blame faulty intelligence instead of their own
failings. Not surprising that a former CIA agent got up in front of a
large group and faced down Rumsfield. The CIA knows the truth.
You do too, but you prefer to make believe whatever you can
about it so you can hide behind the protest. In Germany, most
people
did follow Hitler and you would have too.
Not likely.
That's because he ruled
with a threatening iron fist and did not hesitate to execute his
own
people when he felt like doing so. 1000% different than the here
and
now.
Not at first. He didn't WIN election with an iron fist. Do you think
everyone has forgotten the history of WWII?