vpFREE2 Forums

Like Father, Like Son

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > > > The polls attempt to find a accurate cross section.

Oh,

> and
> > > > guess
> > > > > > what, there are plenty of Republicans in big cities,
> > especially
> > > > the
> > > > > > suburbs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ever hear of RED states & BLUE states??? Try again.
> > > >
> > > > Who hasn't. Simply means the state electoral vote went to
Reps
> or
> > > > Dems. Doesn't mean there aren't millions of voters in that
> state
> > > who voted the other way.
> > >
> > > Typical 'weenie' way out! When beaten back by the quantity
based
> > > facts try again. Now you hide behind ELECTORAL votes. Big
> surprise--
> > > every loser who hates the country comes up with one or the
other
> > lame
> > > excuse every day.
> >
> > Just the facts, as usual. I guess Robbie claims that if a state
is
> > red or blue then everyone in that state voted the same. Is he

for

> > real?
>
> Politics lesson #3 for the blinded: The electoral votes represent
the
> highest level of confidence from the most meaningful sector of
voters
> from any state.

The electoral vote means only one thing. More voters in that state
prefered one candidate over the other. Although this isn't required
by law, it has held true over the years. There is NO "meaningful
sector of voters".

What a dufus! Next time a senator or congressman from Minn. gets
elected, ask him what sector got him voted in and he'll be glad to
help you out.

> That's why it's possible--although not very likely--
> to lose the popular vote while winning the electoral.

Yes, Gore got more votes than Bush?

Could be, but then again, what type of voters would ever vote for a
vornball coward like gore??

> It's the same
> situation we have on the streets. You get a TV eyefull whenever
> there's a protest against the war or Bush or whatever. But the
reason
> the protests are always so meaningless is because they're

comprised

> of hippies, queers, long-hairs, the unemployed, the frazzled, a

few

> fading Hollywood stars, and a plethora of those who have a bad

life

> going on because they were too lazy to work hard enough to get
> anywhere.

Did you think babbling would convince anyone? A vote is a vote.
Period.

It certainly got your attention!! And think what it will do for those
not as stupid as you.

> The same with your sacred polls. Who wants to be bothered
> by a phone call that doesn't help you when you're doing something
> more important? So the natural response would be to say something
> negative. People LOVE to find something wrong with the status

quo.

> Kerry was a shining example of how trying to make something real
out
> of that backfired.

If that is true, I wonder why ALL politicians follow the polls like
hawks? Of course, if you didn't continue to make such idiotic
statements where would we get our entertainment ... you gotta love
it ...

You know that ALL politicians 'follow polls like hawks'?? Submit
evidence to support that assertion.

>
> > > > > > > ....from your weaseling away from the bets to
> > > > > > > your tapdancing around how you got the mystery info

on

my
> > > play
> > > > > > > strategy to run those useless simulations on.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Everyone can see you won't face me in tennis and

bowling.

I
> > > have
> > > > > > called that one right from the start. As for your

system,

> the
> > > > clear
> > > > > > fact you would not face Fezzik with 4-1 odds in your
favor
> is
> > > > more
> > > > > > than enough evidence that you have been lying about
> > everything.
> > > > >
> > > > > Such lying continues.....all you have to do is set up the
> times
> > > and
> > > > > places and it's a go. You keep pussy-footing around doing
> that
> > > for
> > > > > some reason and then manufacture me supposedly not

wanting

> to.
> > > Just
> > > > > do it and you'll feel worse! Oh, and i understand your
> creating
> > a
> > > > > false sense of security over the fezzik bet. That's why

the

> > truth
> > > > is
> > > > > archived forever where it counts. My legend will grow

while

> you
> > > and
> > > > > your words of hate & envy simply fade away.....like those
of
> > > every
> > > > > nobody!
> > > >
> > > > Yes it is archived. In the LVA forums, much to your

chagrin.

> You
> > > > gotta love it.
> > >
> > > If you kept up to date you'd see half of my input was

deleted,

> but
> > > only AFTER the managing editor read every bit of it and
verified
> > > every fact told in my column. sorry little dicky---you almost
> have
> > my
> > > sympathy.
> >
> > Then let's hear from him. Does he have an allegy to keyboards.
>
> I have no idea nor do I care! What I do know is that no matter if
he
> or anyone there came on with a post that again stuck a knife in
your
> heart, you'd do what you and all nerds always do when faced with
> reality: Claim it wasn't actually who he or she said it was

because

> it's the only way you could ever live with yourself.

Of course we'd want verification. Your own history of posting with
multiple ids makes that necessary. However, I would be happy to

meet them in person and verify their credentials. Bring 'em on.

You can't even meet with ME without scampering away at the last
minute! What would you do with someone who still has the opportunity
to find out what a fake and liar you are in person??!!

>
> > > > > > > And every time one comes on siding
> > > > > > > with my ideas you go into a crybaby tirade. Seems to

me

> > > you're
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > able to handle the truth so well after all!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As I've said many times, there will always be some

folks

> > > looking
> > > > > for
> > > > > > an easy solution. "There's a sucker born every minute."
> > That's
> > > > why
> > > > > > con men flourish in our society. All you have to do is
see
> > that
> > > > > Kevin
> > > > > > Trudeau has made millions, 1-20 people fall for

phishing

> > scams,
> > > > > etc.
> > > > > > It is very telling that NO ONE has come on here
supporting
> > your
> > > > > > viewpoint and been willing to debate the facts.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's because no one's as smart as me.
> > > >
> > > > The man that doesn't even understand what "hollow" means.
LMAO.
> > >
> > > And you're basing your neurosis on someone who has from 1 to

20

> > > people fall for something that made this guy millions???
> >
> > Two separate items. Are you really this slow?
>
> When you make no sense, yes.

Kevin Trudeau wrote a scam book, has a newsletter and maintains a
website. Sound familiar? Phishing is another con for identity

theft.

Two separate topics, both are cons.

I've never heard of him and you label him a scammer without knowing
anything about what he says. All you do is make believe you know more
than him like you do on ALL the sites. Too bad as soon as you open
your mouth the first thing that comes out is your foot.

> > > > > HAHA! If it weren't for me and the sense I bring to your
> table
> > > > about
> > > > > the war there'd be no discussion here.
> > > >
> > > > There is no discussion here. Only your idiotic babbling.
> > >
> > > Then, eh-em....why are you doing most of the writing!!!?

Kinda

> hard
> > > to get a point across when all you're doing is making it up

as

> you
> > > go, heh??
> >
> > You are confused again. A debate requires that BOTH parties

take

on
> > the issues in debate. You only babble.
>
> I see you were fired from the college debate team. While the
gullible
> ones are entrenched in leaning on wavering and bumbling using an
> excuse of confusion somewhere, the winner continues to make the
> whiner look a fool. That fool would be you.

Anyone with a semblance of knowledge about debating KNOWs that the
surest way to LOSE is to use name calling. Even hinting at name
calling will guarantee defeat. You wouldn't have a chance.

As I said, that fool would be you!

> > > > > You do here what you do on all
> > > > > the forums: you have nothing to offer, then when someone
> writes
> > > > > something that makes you a wee bit jealous that you

didn't

> > think
> > > of
> > > > > it first, you react by making believe you've been part of
the
> > > > answer
> > > > > all along. Who do you think you're fooling?
> > > >
> > > > No one. Unlike, you I don't try to fool anyone. I simply
report
> > the
> > > > facts which have always left you lookiing foolish.
> > >
> > > A simplified version of ignoring the truth I just wrote about
you
> > > that definitely hit home.
> >
> > See what I mean ... all you do is babble.
>
> Truth never does hit the deceitful receiver lightly. Only problem
is,
> you're not even good at lying when you get caught making it up on
the
> go so often.

And even more babbles. The more you assert nonsense the more

impotent

you look. How sweet it is ...

And as I said, your only comfort is making it up as you go. You have
no other ability.

> > > > > > Not at first. He didn't WIN election with an iron fist.
Do
> > you
> > > > > think
> > > > > > everyone has forgotten the history of WWII?
> > > > >
> > > > > Who said he was elected???
> > > >
> > > > ROTFLMAO. Well, actually he was appointed as a result of
chaos
> in
> > > > Germany. However, it was the direct result of an election

in

> > 1932.
> > > > See:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0403a.asp
> > >
> > > Your life is based on indirect scenarios, nebulous

statements,

> and
> > an
> > > acute walking away from anything that hurts because it's

true.

> I'd
> > > say Hitler would have had you killed his first day in

APPOINTED

> > > office.
> >
> > You didn't even thank me for educating you once again. I really
> > should charge for this personal tutoring.
>
> Sorry to break it to you, but unless it's about something I'm not
> sure of or I'm looking for a laugh or two, I rarely go to all

those

> sites you use as crutches when you're trying to educate yourself.
> Haven't you heard?? I'm smart!

We all know better than that.

Anyone who consistently feels more comfort in adding in others to his
beliefs has little to no confidence in his baloney. Here's a hint: If
you want any credibility at all, try saying something that doesn't
need to lean on make believe others to keep you from falling on your
face right away.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > > > > The polls attempt to find a accurate cross section.
Oh,
> > and
> > > > > guess
> > > > > > > what, there are plenty of Republicans in big cities,
> > > especially
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > suburbs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ever hear of RED states & BLUE states??? Try again.
> > > > >
> > > > > Who hasn't. Simply means the state electoral vote went to
> Reps
> > or
> > > > > Dems. Doesn't mean there aren't millions of voters in

that

> > state
> > > > who voted the other way.
> > > >
> > > > Typical 'weenie' way out! When beaten back by the quantity
> based
> > > > facts try again. Now you hide behind ELECTORAL votes. Big
> > surprise--
> > > > every loser who hates the country comes up with one or the
> other
> > > lame
> > > > excuse every day.
> > >
> > > Just the facts, as usual. I guess Robbie claims that if a

state

> is
> > > red or blue then everyone in that state voted the same. Is he
for
> > > real?
> >
> > Politics lesson #3 for the blinded: The electoral votes

represent

> the
> > highest level of confidence from the most meaningful sector of
> voters
> > from any state.
>
> The electoral vote means only one thing. More voters in that

state

> prefered one candidate over the other. Although this isn't

required

> by law, it has held true over the years. There is NO "meaningful
> sector of voters".

What a dufus! Next time a senator or congressman from Minn. gets
elected, ask him what sector got him voted in and he'll be glad to
help you out.

Voting blocs have nothing to do with the electoral college. A very
poor attempt to hide your previous idiotic post.

>
> > That's why it's possible--although not very likely--
> > to lose the popular vote while winning the electoral.
>
> Yes, Gore got more votes than Bush?

Could be, but then again, what type of voters would ever vote for a
vornball coward like gore??

Over 50% of the voters.

>
> > It's the same
> > situation we have on the streets. You get a TV eyefull whenever
> > there's a protest against the war or Bush or whatever. But the
> reason
> > the protests are always so meaningless is because they're
comprised
> > of hippies, queers, long-hairs, the unemployed, the frazzled, a
few
> > fading Hollywood stars, and a plethora of those who have a bad
life
> > going on because they were too lazy to work hard enough to get
> > anywhere.
>
> Did you think babbling would convince anyone? A vote is a vote.
> Period.

It certainly got your attention!! And think what it will do for

those

not as stupid as you.

Still backtracking I see. You gotta love it ...

>
> > The same with your sacred polls. Who wants to be bothered
> > by a phone call that doesn't help you when you're doing

something

> > more important? So the natural response would be to say

something

> > negative. People LOVE to find something wrong with the status
quo.
> > Kerry was a shining example of how trying to make something

real

> out
> > of that backfired.
>
> If that is true, I wonder why ALL politicians follow the polls

like

> hawks? Of course, if you didn't continue to make such idiotic
> statements where would we get our entertainment ... you gotta

love

> it ...

You know that ALL politicians 'follow polls like hawks'?? Submit
evidence to support that assertion.

Just watch the news, little man. It's been on every network for days
now. You must actually enjoy making foolish statements.

>
> >
> > > > > > > > ....from your weaseling away from the bets to
> > > > > > > > your tapdancing around how you got the mystery info
on
> my
> > > > play
> > > > > > > > strategy to run those useless simulations on.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Everyone can see you won't face me in tennis and
bowling.
> I
> > > > have
> > > > > > > called that one right from the start. As for your
system,
> > the
> > > > > clear
> > > > > > > fact you would not face Fezzik with 4-1 odds in your
> favor
> > is
> > > > > more
> > > > > > > than enough evidence that you have been lying about
> > > everything.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Such lying continues.....all you have to do is set up

the

> > times
> > > > and
> > > > > > places and it's a go. You keep pussy-footing around

doing

> > that
> > > > for
> > > > > > some reason and then manufacture me supposedly not
wanting
> > to.
> > > > Just
> > > > > > do it and you'll feel worse! Oh, and i understand your
> > creating
> > > a
> > > > > > false sense of security over the fezzik bet. That's why
the
> > > truth
> > > > > is
> > > > > > archived forever where it counts. My legend will grow
while
> > you
> > > > and
> > > > > > your words of hate & envy simply fade away.....like

those

> of
> > > > every
> > > > > > nobody!
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes it is archived. In the LVA forums, much to your
chagrin.
> > You
> > > > > gotta love it.
> > > >
> > > > If you kept up to date you'd see half of my input was
deleted,
> > but
> > > > only AFTER the managing editor read every bit of it and
> verified
> > > > every fact told in my column. sorry little dicky---you

almost

> > have
> > > my
> > > > sympathy.
> > >
> > > Then let's hear from him. Does he have an allegy to keyboards.
> >
> > I have no idea nor do I care! What I do know is that no matter

if

> he
> > or anyone there came on with a post that again stuck a knife in
> your
> > heart, you'd do what you and all nerds always do when faced

with

> > reality: Claim it wasn't actually who he or she said it was
because
> > it's the only way you could ever live with yourself.
>
> Of course we'd want verification. Your own history of posting

with

> multiple ids makes that necessary. However, I would be happy to
meet them in person and verify their credentials. Bring 'em on.

You can't even meet with ME without scampering away at the last
minute! What would you do with someone who still has the

opportunity

to find out what a fake and liar you are in person??!!

Bring 'em on ... or was this just another lie?

>
> >
> > > > > > > > And every time one comes on siding
> > > > > > > > with my ideas you go into a crybaby tirade. Seems

to

me
> > > > you're
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > able to handle the truth so well after all!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As I've said many times, there will always be some
folks
> > > > looking
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > an easy solution. "There's a sucker born every

minute."

> > > That's
> > > > > why
> > > > > > > con men flourish in our society. All you have to do

is

> see
> > > that
> > > > > > Kevin
> > > > > > > Trudeau has made millions, 1-20 people fall for
phishing
> > > scams,
> > > > > > etc.
> > > > > > > It is very telling that NO ONE has come on here
> supporting
> > > your
> > > > > > > viewpoint and been willing to debate the facts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's because no one's as smart as me.
> > > > >
> > > > > The man that doesn't even understand what "hollow" means.
> LMAO.
> > > >
> > > > And you're basing your neurosis on someone who has from 1

to

20
> > > > people fall for something that made this guy millions???
> > >
> > > Two separate items. Are you really this slow?
> >
> > When you make no sense, yes.
>
> Kevin Trudeau wrote a scam book, has a newsletter and maintains a
> website. Sound familiar? Phishing is another con for identity
theft.
> Two separate topics, both are cons.

I've never heard of him and you label him a scammer without knowing
anything about what he says. All you do is make believe you know

more

than him like you do on ALL the sites. Too bad as soon as you open
your mouth the first thing that comes out is your foot.

LMAO. Trudeau has done the 1/2 hour TV promos many times. If you
didn't live in a cave you probably would have heard him by now. All
you have to do is hear him talk to see how much you two are alike.

> > > > > > HAHA! If it weren't for me and the sense I bring to

your

> > table
> > > > > about
> > > > > > the war there'd be no discussion here.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no discussion here. Only your idiotic babbling.
> > > >
> > > > Then, eh-em....why are you doing most of the writing!!!?
Kinda
> > hard
> > > > to get a point across when all you're doing is making it up
as
> > you
> > > > go, heh??
> > >
> > > You are confused again. A debate requires that BOTH parties
take
> on
> > > the issues in debate. You only babble.
> >
> > I see you were fired from the college debate team. While the
> gullible
> > ones are entrenched in leaning on wavering and bumbling using

an

> > excuse of confusion somewhere, the winner continues to make the
> > whiner look a fool. That fool would be you.
>
> Anyone with a semblance of knowledge about debating KNOWs that

the

> surest way to LOSE is to use name calling. Even hinting at name
> calling will guarantee defeat. You wouldn't have a chance.

As I said, that fool would be you!

RIV at it again.

> > > > > > You do here what you do on all
> > > > > > the forums: you have nothing to offer, then when

someone

> > writes
> > > > > > something that makes you a wee bit jealous that you
didn't
> > > think
> > > > of
> > > > > > it first, you react by making believe you've been part

of

> the
> > > > > answer
> > > > > > all along. Who do you think you're fooling?
> > > > >
> > > > > No one. Unlike, you I don't try to fool anyone. I simply
> report
> > > the
> > > > > facts which have always left you lookiing foolish.
> > > >
> > > > A simplified version of ignoring the truth I just wrote

about

> you
> > > > that definitely hit home.
> > >
> > > See what I mean ... all you do is babble.
> >
> > Truth never does hit the deceitful receiver lightly. Only

problem

> is,
> > you're not even good at lying when you get caught making it up

on

> the
> > go so often.
>
> And even more babbles. The more you assert nonsense the more
impotent
> you look. How sweet it is ...

And as I said, your only comfort is making it up as you go. You

have

no other ability.

RIV again. you gotta love it ...

>
> > > > > > > Not at first. He didn't WIN election with an iron

fist.

> Do
> > > you
> > > > > > think
> > > > > > > everyone has forgotten the history of WWII?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Who said he was elected???
> > > > >
> > > > > ROTFLMAO. Well, actually he was appointed as a result of
> chaos
> > in
> > > > > Germany. However, it was the direct result of an election
in
> > > 1932.
> > > > > See:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0403a.asp
> > > >
> > > > Your life is based on indirect scenarios, nebulous
statements,
> > and
> > > an
> > > > acute walking away from anything that hurts because it's
true.
> > I'd
> > > > say Hitler would have had you killed his first day in
APPOINTED
> > > > office.
> > >
> > > You didn't even thank me for educating you once again. I

really

> > > should charge for this personal tutoring.
> >
> > Sorry to break it to you, but unless it's about something I'm

not

> > sure of or I'm looking for a laugh or two, I rarely go to all
those
> > sites you use as crutches when you're trying to educate

yourself.

> > Haven't you heard?? I'm smart!
>
> We all know better than that.

Anyone who consistently feels more comfort in adding in others to

his

beliefs has little to no confidence in his baloney. Here's a hint:

If

you want any credibility at all, try saying something that doesn't
need to lean on make believe others to keep you from falling on

your

face right away.

WE really love it when Robbie gets this frustrated. How sweet it
is ...

> > > > > > > Ever hear of RED states & BLUE states??? Try again.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Who hasn't. Simply means the state electoral vote went

to

> > Reps
> > > or
> > > > > > Dems. Doesn't mean there aren't millions of voters in
that
> > > state
> > > > > who voted the other way.
> > > > >
> > > > > Typical 'weenie' way out! When beaten back by the

quantity

> > based
> > > > > facts try again. Now you hide behind ELECTORAL votes. Big
> > > surprise--
> > > > > every loser who hates the country comes up with one or

the

> > other
> > > > lame
> > > > > excuse every day.
> > > >
> > > > Just the facts, as usual. I guess Robbie claims that if a
state
> > is
> > > > red or blue then everyone in that state voted the same. Is

he

> for
> > > > real?
> > >
> > > Politics lesson #3 for the blinded: The electoral votes
represent
> > the
> > > highest level of confidence from the most meaningful sector

of

> > voters
> > > from any state.
> >
> > The electoral vote means only one thing. More voters in that
state
> > prefered one candidate over the other. Although this isn't
required
> > by law, it has held true over the years. There is

NO "meaningful

> > sector of voters".
>
> What a dufus! Next time a senator or congressman from Minn. gets
> elected, ask him what sector got him voted in and he'll be glad

to help you out.

Voting blocs have nothing to do with the electoral college. A very
poor attempt to hide your previous idiotic post.

Hello McFly!!?! Anyone home in there?? Politicians go after certain
communities because of businesses or other reasons that should
prevail. That's called sectoral voting, and that's exactly where, how
& why certain electoral votes are pursued.

> >
> > > That's why it's possible--although not very likely--
> > > to lose the popular vote while winning the electoral.
> >
> > Yes, Gore got more votes than Bush?
>
> Could be, but then again, what type of voters would ever vote for

a

> cornball coward like Gore??

Over 50% of the voters.

Right, and that alone tells you how they screwed it all up for him.
With that kind of meaningless voters on his side, we'll give him the
popular vote every day.

> >
> > > It's the same
> > > situation we have on the streets. You get a TV eyefull

whenever

> > > there's a protest against the war or Bush or whatever. But

the

> > reason
> > > the protests are always so meaningless is because they're
> comprised
> > > of hippies, queers, long-hairs, the unemployed, the frazzled,

a

> few
> > > fading Hollywood stars, and a plethora of those who have a

bad

> life
> > > going on because they were too lazy to work hard enough to

get

> > > anywhere.
> >
> > Did you think babbling would convince anyone? A vote is a vote.
> > Period.
>
> It certainly got your attention!! And think what it will do for
those
> not as stupid as you.

Still backtracking I see. You gotta love it ...

You mean 'backpacking' don't you? It's just as meaningful as whatever
it is you said!

> > > The same with your sacred polls. Who wants to be bothered
> > > by a phone call that doesn't help you when you're doing
something
> > > more important? So the natural response would be to say
something
> > > negative. People LOVE to find something wrong with the status
> quo.
> > > Kerry was a shining example of how trying to make something
real
> > out
> > > of that backfired.
> >
> > If that is true, I wonder why ALL politicians follow the polls
like
> > hawks? Of course, if you didn't continue to make such idiotic
> > statements where would we get our entertainment ... you gotta
love
> > it ...
>
> You know that ALL politicians 'follow polls like hawks'?? Submit
> evidence to support that assertion.

Just watch the news, little man. It's been on every network for

days

now. You must actually enjoy making foolish statements.

I did. nothing about how "ALL politicians follow polls like hawks"!
see what happens when you make it up as you go?? Will you ever learn?

> > > > > > Yes it is archived. In the LVA forums, much to your
> chagrin.
> > > You
> > > > > > gotta love it.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you kept up to date you'd see half of my input was
> deleted,
> > > but
> > > > > only AFTER the managing editor read every bit of it and
> > verified
> > > > > every fact told in my column. sorry little dicky---you
almost
> > > have
> > > > my
> > > > > sympathy.
> > > >
> > > > Then let's hear from him. Does he have an allegy to

keyboards.

> > >
> > > I have no idea nor do I care! What I do know is that no

matter

if
> > he
> > > or anyone there came on with a post that again stuck a knife

in

> > your
> > > heart, you'd do what you and all nerds always do when faced
with
> > > reality: Claim it wasn't actually who he or she said it was
> because
> > > it's the only way you could ever live with yourself.
> >
> > Of course we'd want verification. Your own history of posting
with
> > multiple ids makes that necessary. However, I would be happy to
> meet them in person and verify their credentials. Bring 'em on.
>
> You can't even meet with ME without scampering away at the last
> minute! What would you do with someone who still has the
opportunity
> to find out what a fake and liar you are in person??!!

Bring 'em on ... or was this just another lie?

Answer the question and stop scampering away.

> > > > > > > > It is very telling that NO ONE has come on here
> > supporting
> > > > your
> > > > > > > > viewpoint and been willing to debate the facts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That's because no one's as smart as me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The man that doesn't even understand what "hollow"

means.

> > LMAO.
> > > > >
> > > > > And you're basing your neurosis on someone who has from 1
to
> 20
> > > > > people fall for something that made this guy millions???
> > > >
> > > > Two separate items. Are you really this slow?
> > >
> > > When you make no sense, yes.
> >
> > Kevin Trudeau wrote a scam book, has a newsletter and maintains

a

> > website. Sound familiar? Phishing is another con for identity
> theft.
> > Two separate topics, both are cons.
>
> I've never heard of him and you label him a scammer without

knowing

> anything about what he says. All you do is make believe you know
more
> than him like you do on ALL the sites. Too bad as soon as you

open

> your mouth the first thing that comes out is your foot.

LMAO. Trudeau has done the 1/2 hour TV promos many times. If you
didn't live in a cave you probably would have heard him by now. All
you have to do is hear him talk to see how much you two are alike.

This is hardly a cave and I've never heard of him. Is he a geek?

> > > > > > > HAHA! If it weren't for me and the sense I bring to
your
> > > table
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > > the war there'd be no discussion here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is no discussion here. Only your idiotic babbling.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then, eh-em....why are you doing most of the writing!!!?
> Kinda
> > > hard
> > > > > to get a point across when all you're doing is making it

up

> as
> > > you
> > > > > go, heh??
> > > >
> > > > You are confused again. A debate requires that BOTH parties
> take
> > on
> > > > the issues in debate. You only babble.
> > >
> > > I see you were fired from the college debate team. While the
> > gullible
> > > ones are entrenched in leaning on wavering and bumbling using
an
> > > excuse of confusion somewhere, the winner continues to make

the

> > > whiner look a fool. That fool would be you.
> >
> > Anyone with a semblance of knowledge about debating KNOWs that
the
> > surest way to LOSE is to use name calling. Even hinting at name
> > calling will guarantee defeat. You wouldn't have a chance.
>
> As I said, that fool would be you!

RIV at it again.

>
> > > > > > > You do here what you do on all
> > > > > > > the forums: you have nothing to offer, then when
someone
> > > writes
> > > > > > > something that makes you a wee bit jealous that you
> didn't
> > > > think
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > it first, you react by making believe you've been

part

of
> > the
> > > > > > answer
> > > > > > > all along. Who do you think you're fooling?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No one. Unlike, you I don't try to fool anyone. I

simply

> > report
> > > > the
> > > > > > facts which have always left you lookiing foolish.
> > > > >
> > > > > A simplified version of ignoring the truth I just wrote
about
> > you
> > > > > that definitely hit home.
> > > >
> > > > See what I mean ... all you do is babble.
> > >
> > > Truth never does hit the deceitful receiver lightly. Only
problem
> > is,
> > > you're not even good at lying when you get caught making it

up

on
> > the
> > > go so often.
> >
> > And even more babbles. The more you assert nonsense the more
> impotent
> > you look. How sweet it is ...
>
> And as I said, your only comfort is making it up as you go. You
have
> no other ability.
> > > Sorry to break it to you, but unless it's about something I'm
not
> > > sure of or I'm looking for a laugh or two, I rarely go to all
> those
> > > sites you use as crutches when you're trying to educate
yourself.
> > > Haven't you heard?? I'm smart!
> >
> > We all know better than that.
>
> Anyone who consistently feels more comfort in adding in others to
his
> beliefs has little to no confidence in his baloney. Here's a

hint:

If
> you want any credibility at all, try saying something that

doesn't

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

> need to lean on make believe others to keep you from falling on
your
> face right away.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > > > > > Ever hear of RED states & BLUE states??? Try again.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Who hasn't. Simply means the state electoral vote

went

to
> > > Reps
> > > > or
> > > > > > > Dems. Doesn't mean there aren't millions of voters in
> that
> > > > state
> > > > > > who voted the other way.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Typical 'weenie' way out! When beaten back by the
quantity
> > > based
> > > > > > facts try again. Now you hide behind ELECTORAL votes.

Big

> > > > surprise--
> > > > > > every loser who hates the country comes up with one or
the
> > > other
> > > > > lame
> > > > > > excuse every day.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just the facts, as usual. I guess Robbie claims that if a
> state
> > > is
> > > > > red or blue then everyone in that state voted the same.

Is

he
> > for
> > > > > real?
> > > >
> > > > Politics lesson #3 for the blinded: The electoral votes
> represent
> > > the
> > > > highest level of confidence from the most meaningful sector
of
> > > voters
> > > > from any state.
> > >
> > > The electoral vote means only one thing. More voters in that
> state
> > > prefered one candidate over the other. Although this isn't
> required
> > > by law, it has held true over the years. There is
NO "meaningful
> > > sector of voters".
> >
> > What a dufus! Next time a senator or congressman from Minn.

gets

> > elected, ask him what sector got him voted in and he'll be glad
to help you out.
>
> Voting blocs have nothing to do with the electoral college. A

very

> poor attempt to hide your previous idiotic post.

Hello McFly!!?! Anyone home in there?? Politicians go after certain
communities because of businesses or other reasons that should
prevail. That's called sectoral voting, and that's exactly where,

how

& why certain electoral votes are pursued.

ROTFLMAO. Sorry moron, a vote is a vote. The candidiate with the most
votes in a state gets ALL the electoral votes from that state.
Candidates may highlight their positions on different issues in
different states (usually based on polls) but no one's vote counts
more than any other. Don't you just love it when Robbie tries to
backtrack after making one stupid remark by making even more stupid
remarks.

>
> > >
> > > > That's why it's possible--although not very likely--
> > > > to lose the popular vote while winning the electoral.
> > >
> > > Yes, Gore got more votes than Bush?
> >
> > Could be, but then again, what type of voters would ever vote

for

a
> > cornball coward like Gore??
>
> Over 50% of the voters.

Right, and that alone tells you how they screwed it all up for him.
With that kind of meaningless voters on his side, we'll give him

the

popular vote every day.

All it would have taken is a few more "meaningless" votes in Florida
and your hero would never have been elected.

>
> > >
> > > > It's the same
> > > > situation we have on the streets. You get a TV eyefull
whenever
> > > > there's a protest against the war or Bush or whatever. But
the
> > > reason
> > > > the protests are always so meaningless is because they're
> > comprised
> > > > of hippies, queers, long-hairs, the unemployed, the

frazzled,

a
> > few
> > > > fading Hollywood stars, and a plethora of those who have a
bad
> > life
> > > > going on because they were too lazy to work hard enough to
get
> > > > anywhere.
> > >
> > > Did you think babbling would convince anyone? A vote is a

vote.

> > > Period.
> >
> > It certainly got your attention!! And think what it will do for
> those
> > not as stupid as you.
>
> Still backtracking I see. You gotta love it ...

You mean 'backpacking' don't you? It's just as meaningful as

whatever

it is you said!

No, two entirely different words. One describes your actions the
other is another example of how you do the first.

> > > > The same with your sacred polls. Who wants to be bothered
> > > > by a phone call that doesn't help you when you're doing
> something
> > > > more important? So the natural response would be to say
> something
> > > > negative. People LOVE to find something wrong with the

status

> > quo.
> > > > Kerry was a shining example of how trying to make something
> real
> > > out
> > > > of that backfired.
> > >
> > > If that is true, I wonder why ALL politicians follow the

polls

> like
> > > hawks? Of course, if you didn't continue to make such idiotic
> > > statements where would we get our entertainment ... you gotta
> love
> > > it ...
> >
> > You know that ALL politicians 'follow polls like hawks'??

Submit

> > evidence to support that assertion.
>
> Just watch the news, little man. It's been on every network for
days
> now. You must actually enjoy making foolish statements.

I did. nothing about how "ALL politicians follow polls like hawks"!
see what happens when you make it up as you go?? Will you ever

learn?

LMAO. Nice try, but anyone reading this has already seen all the
coverage on TV. They are smart enough to understand what it means
even if you aren't.

>
> > > > > > > Yes it is archived. In the LVA forums, much to your
> > chagrin.
> > > > You
> > > > > > > gotta love it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you kept up to date you'd see half of my input was
> > deleted,
> > > > but
> > > > > > only AFTER the managing editor read every bit of it and
> > > verified
> > > > > > every fact told in my column. sorry little dicky---you
> almost
> > > > have
> > > > > my
> > > > > > sympathy.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then let's hear from him. Does he have an allegy to
keyboards.
> > > >
> > > > I have no idea nor do I care! What I do know is that no
matter
> if
> > > he
> > > > or anyone there came on with a post that again stuck a

knife

in
> > > your
> > > > heart, you'd do what you and all nerds always do when faced
> with
> > > > reality: Claim it wasn't actually who he or she said it was
> > because
> > > > it's the only way you could ever live with yourself.
> > >
> > > Of course we'd want verification. Your own history of posting
> with
> > > multiple ids makes that necessary. However, I would be happy

to

> > meet them in person and verify their credentials. Bring 'em on.
> >
> > You can't even meet with ME without scampering away at the last
> > minute! What would you do with someone who still has the
> opportunity
> > to find out what a fake and liar you are in person??!!
>
> Bring 'em on ... or was this just another lie?

Answer the question and stop scampering away.

There was no question, only your typical babbles and now another
effort to avoid the issue. If anyone at GT can verify your claims
let's hear from them.

>
> > > > > > > > > It is very telling that NO ONE has come on here
> > > supporting
> > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > viewpoint and been willing to debate the facts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > That's because no one's as smart as me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The man that doesn't even understand what "hollow"
means.
> > > LMAO.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And you're basing your neurosis on someone who has from

1

> to
> > 20
> > > > > > people fall for something that made this guy millions???
> > > > >
> > > > > Two separate items. Are you really this slow?
> > > >
> > > > When you make no sense, yes.
> > >
> > > Kevin Trudeau wrote a scam book, has a newsletter and

maintains

a
> > > website. Sound familiar? Phishing is another con for identity
> > theft.
> > > Two separate topics, both are cons.
> >
> > I've never heard of him and you label him a scammer without
knowing
> > anything about what he says. All you do is make believe you

know

> more
> > than him like you do on ALL the sites. Too bad as soon as you
open
> > your mouth the first thing that comes out is your foot.
>
> LMAO. Trudeau has done the 1/2 hour TV promos many times. If you
> didn't live in a cave you probably would have heard him by now.

All

> you have to do is hear him talk to see how much you two are alike.

This is hardly a cave and I've never heard of him. Is he a geek?

He is a con man. Only he makes millions.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Ever hear of RED states & BLUE states??? Try

again.

> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Who hasn't. Simply means the state electoral vote
went
> to
> > > > Reps
> > > > > or
> > > > > > > > Dems. Doesn't mean there aren't millions of voters

in

> > that
> > > > > state
> > > > > > > who voted the other way.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Typical 'weenie' way out! When beaten back by the
> quantity
> > > > based
> > > > > > > facts try again. Now you hide behind ELECTORAL votes.
Big
> > > > > surprise--
> > > > > > > every loser who hates the country comes up with one

or

> the
> > > > other
> > > > > > lame
> > > > > > > excuse every day.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just the facts, as usual. I guess Robbie claims that if

a

> > state
> > > > is
> > > > > > red or blue then everyone in that state voted the same.
Is
> he
> > > for
> > > > > > real?
> > > > >
> > > > > Politics lesson #3 for the blinded: The electoral votes
> > represent
> > > > the
> > > > > highest level of confidence from the most meaningful

sector

> of
> > > > voters
> > > > > from any state.
> > > >
> > > > The electoral vote means only one thing. More voters in

that

> > state
> > > > prefered one candidate over the other. Although this isn't
> > required
> > > > by law, it has held true over the years. There is
> NO "meaningful
> > > > sector of voters".
> > >
> > > What a dufus! Next time a senator or congressman from Minn.
gets
> > > elected, ask him what sector got him voted in and he'll be

glad

> to help you out.
> >
> > Voting blocs have nothing to do with the electoral college. A
very
> > poor attempt to hide your previous idiotic post.
>
> Hello McFly!!?! Anyone home in there?? Politicians go after

certain

> communities because of businesses or other reasons that should
> prevail. That's called sectoral voting, and that's exactly where,
how
> & why certain electoral votes are pursued.

ROTFLMAO. Sorry moron, a vote is a vote. The candidiate with the

most

votes in a state gets ALL the electoral votes from that state.
Candidates may highlight their positions on different issues in
different states (usually based on polls) but no one's vote counts
more than any other. Don't you just love it when Robbie tries to
backtrack after making one stupid remark by making even more stupid
remarks.

I see why you're sorry. You can't figure it out even when it's
spelled out for you in your own language! Oh, and re-read your
nonsense again and then tell us just who is the genius. I'm
supposedly "bactracking" by making "even more remarks"!! HAHAHAHA!
You are sooo easy to make a fool of. It's beginning to not even be a
challenge any more. Woe is me.....

> >
> > > >
> > > > > That's why it's possible--although not very likely--
> > > > > to lose the popular vote while winning the electoral.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, Gore got more votes than Bush?
> > >
> > > Could be, but then again, what type of voters would ever vote
for
> a
> > > cornball coward like Gore??
> >
> > Over 50% of the voters.
>
> Right, and that alone tells you how they screwed it all up for

him.

> With that kind of meaningless voters on his side, we'll give him
the
> popular vote every day.

All it would have taken is a few more "meaningless" votes in

Florida and your hero would never have been elected.

Don't you just love fate! Blame your boy Clinton the Clitoris for
Gore's defeat.

> > > > > It's the same
> > > > > situation we have on the streets. You get a TV eyefull
> whenever
> > > > > there's a protest against the war or Bush or whatever.

But

> the
> > > > reason
> > > > > the protests are always so meaningless is because they're
> > > comprised
> > > > > of hippies, queers, long-hairs, the unemployed, the
frazzled,
> a
> > > few
> > > > > fading Hollywood stars, and a plethora of those who have

a

> bad
> > > life
> > > > > going on because they were too lazy to work hard enough

to

> get
> > > > > anywhere.
> > > >
> > > > Did you think babbling would convince anyone? A vote is a
vote.
> > > > Period.
> > >
> > > It certainly got your attention!! And think what it will do

for

> > those
> > > not as stupid as you.
> >
> > Still backtracking I see. You gotta love it ...
>
> You mean 'backpacking' don't you? It's just as meaningful as
whatever
> it is you said!

No, two entirely different words. One describes your actions the
other is another example of how you do the first.

And da blubba esto la flubba delayte gu pubba silozubba. You are such
a tootsie pop!

> > > > > The same with your sacred polls. Who wants to be bothered
> > > > > by a phone call that doesn't help you when you're doing
> > something
> > > > > more important? So the natural response would be to say
> > something
> > > > > negative. People LOVE to find something wrong with the
status
> > > quo.
> > > > > Kerry was a shining example of how trying to make

something

> > real
> > > > out
> > > > > of that backfired.
> > > >
> > > > If that is true, I wonder why ALL politicians follow the
polls
> > like
> > > > hawks? Of course, if you didn't continue to make such

idiotic

> > > > statements where would we get our entertainment ... you

gotta

> > love
> > > > it ...
> > >
> > > You know that ALL politicians 'follow polls like hawks'??
Submit
> > > evidence to support that assertion.
> >
> > Just watch the news, little man. It's been on every network for
> days
> > now. You must actually enjoy making foolish statements.
>
> I did. nothing about how "ALL politicians follow polls like

hawks"!

> see what happens when you make it up as you go?? Will you ever
learn?

LMAO. Nice try, but anyone reading this has already seen all the
coverage on TV. They are smart enough to understand what it means
even if you aren't.

Here'a what i just saw. there was another poll on the eavesdropping
issue. A whole 1000 people were polled! I don't even know the result
because after i heard that I ignored the nonsense. Either way it
means nothing. Exactly why the great GWB pays zero attention to them.
THAT'S what you gotta love!

> >
> > > > > > > > Yes it is archived. In the LVA forums, much to your
> > > chagrin.
> > > > > You
> > > > > > > > gotta love it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you kept up to date you'd see half of my input was
> > > deleted,
> > > > > but
> > > > > > > only AFTER the managing editor read every bit of it

and

> > > > verified
> > > > > > > every fact told in my column. sorry little dicky---

you

> > almost
> > > > > have
> > > > > > my
> > > > > > > sympathy.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Then let's hear from him. Does he have an allegy to
> keyboards.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have no idea nor do I care! What I do know is that no
> matter
> > if
> > > > he
> > > > > or anyone there came on with a post that again stuck a
knife
> in
> > > > your
> > > > > heart, you'd do what you and all nerds always do when

faced

> > with
> > > > > reality: Claim it wasn't actually who he or she said it

was

> > > because
> > > > > it's the only way you could ever live with yourself.
> > > >
> > > > Of course we'd want verification. Your own history of

posting

> > with
> > > > multiple ids makes that necessary. However, I would be

happy

to
> > > meet them in person and verify their credentials. Bring 'em

on.

> > >
> > > You can't even meet with ME without scampering away at the

last

> > > minute! What would you do with someone who still has the
> > opportunity
> > > to find out what a fake and liar you are in person??!!
> >
> > Bring 'em on ... or was this just another lie?
>
> Answer the question and stop scampering away.

There was no question, only your typical babbles and now another
effort to avoid the issue. If anyone at GT can verify your claims
let's hear from them.

Um, I don't summons them to the Internet. Wait until you're in town
and then go over and ask around. You wouldn't believe anyone anyway
unless they were in the office when they made you look stupid. The
only way I can be sure you were stomped on is by verification that
you were there.

> >
> > > > > > > > > > It is very telling that NO ONE has come on here
> > > > supporting
> > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > viewpoint and been willing to debate the facts.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > That's because no one's as smart as me.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The man that doesn't even understand what "hollow"
> means.
> > > > LMAO.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And you're basing your neurosis on someone who has

from

1
> > to
> > > 20
> > > > > > > people fall for something that made this guy

millions???

> > > > > >
> > > > > > Two separate items. Are you really this slow?
> > > > >
> > > > > When you make no sense, yes.
> > > >
> > > > Kevin Trudeau wrote a scam book, has a newsletter and
maintains
> a
> > > > website. Sound familiar? Phishing is another con for

identity

> > > theft.
> > > > Two separate topics, both are cons.
> > >
> > > I've never heard of him and you label him a scammer without
> knowing
> > > anything about what he says. All you do is make believe you
know
> > more
> > > than him like you do on ALL the sites. Too bad as soon as you
> open
> > > your mouth the first thing that comes out is your foot.
> >
> > LMAO. Trudeau has done the 1/2 hour TV promos many times. If

you

> > didn't live in a cave you probably would have heard him by now.
All
> > you have to do is hear him talk to see how much you two are

alike.

>
> This is hardly a cave and I've never heard of him. Is he a geek?

He is a con man. Only he makes millions.

Prove he is a con man, and then eh-em....prove he has made millions!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > Ever hear of RED states & BLUE states??? Try
again.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Who hasn't. Simply means the state electoral vote
> went
> > to
> > > > > Reps
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > Dems. Doesn't mean there aren't millions of

voters

in
> > > that
> > > > > > state
> > > > > > > > who voted the other way.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Typical 'weenie' way out! When beaten back by the
> > quantity
> > > > > based
> > > > > > > > facts try again. Now you hide behind ELECTORAL

votes.

> Big
> > > > > > surprise--
> > > > > > > > every loser who hates the country comes up with one
or
> > the
> > > > > other
> > > > > > > lame
> > > > > > > > excuse every day.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just the facts, as usual. I guess Robbie claims that

if

a
> > > state
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > red or blue then everyone in that state voted the

same.

> Is
> > he
> > > > for
> > > > > > > real?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Politics lesson #3 for the blinded: The electoral votes
> > > represent
> > > > > the
> > > > > > highest level of confidence from the most meaningful
sector
> > of
> > > > > voters
> > > > > > from any state.
> > > > >
> > > > > The electoral vote means only one thing. More voters in
that
> > > state
> > > > > prefered one candidate over the other. Although this

isn't

> > > required
> > > > > by law, it has held true over the years. There is
> > NO "meaningful
> > > > > sector of voters".
> > > >
> > > > What a dufus! Next time a senator or congressman from Minn.
> gets
> > > > elected, ask him what sector got him voted in and he'll be
glad
> > to help you out.
> > >
> > > Voting blocs have nothing to do with the electoral college. A
> very
> > > poor attempt to hide your previous idiotic post.
> >
> > Hello McFly!!?! Anyone home in there?? Politicians go after
certain
> > communities because of businesses or other reasons that should
> > prevail. That's called sectoral voting, and that's exactly

where,

> how
> > & why certain electoral votes are pursued.
>
> ROTFLMAO. Sorry moron, a vote is a vote. The candidiate with the
most
> votes in a state gets ALL the electoral votes from that state.
> Candidates may highlight their positions on different issues in
> different states (usually based on polls) but no one's vote

counts

> more than any other. Don't you just love it when Robbie tries to
> backtrack after making one stupid remark by making even more

stupid

> remarks.

I see why you're sorry. You can't figure it out even when it's
spelled out for you in your own language!

My language is English. Let me know when "it's spelled out".

Oh, and re-read your
nonsense again and then tell us just who is the genius. I'm
supposedly "bactracking" by making "even more remarks"!! HAHAHAHA!

Your idiotic remarks are backtracking when they don't support your
previous remarks. You really are quite dumb.

You are sooo easy to make a fool of. It's beginning to not even be

a

challenge any more. Woe is me.....

CC. It's not even fair to call your remarks impotent anymore. That
would be too kind. They are so lacking of any content that all one
can do is sit and laugh.

>
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > That's why it's possible--although not very likely--
> > > > > > to lose the popular vote while winning the electoral.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, Gore got more votes than Bush?
> > > >
> > > > Could be, but then again, what type of voters would ever

vote

> for
> > a
> > > > cornball coward like Gore??
> > >
> > > Over 50% of the voters.
> >
> > Right, and that alone tells you how they screwed it all up for
him.
> > With that kind of meaningless voters on his side, we'll give

him

> the
> > popular vote every day.
>
> All it would have taken is a few more "meaningless" votes in
Florida and your hero would never have been elected.

Don't you just love fate! Blame your boy Clinton the Clitoris for
Gore's defeat.

Clinton was never my boy. Are you so completely brain dead you forgot
I NEVER voted for him.

> > > > > > It's the same
> > > > > > situation we have on the streets. You get a TV eyefull
> > whenever
> > > > > > there's a protest against the war or Bush or whatever.
But
> > the
> > > > > reason
> > > > > > the protests are always so meaningless is because

they're

> > > > comprised
> > > > > > of hippies, queers, long-hairs, the unemployed, the
> frazzled,
> > a
> > > > few
> > > > > > fading Hollywood stars, and a plethora of those who

have

a
> > bad
> > > > life
> > > > > > going on because they were too lazy to work hard enough
to
> > get
> > > > > > anywhere.
> > > > >
> > > > > Did you think babbling would convince anyone? A vote is a
> vote.
> > > > > Period.
> > > >
> > > > It certainly got your attention!! And think what it will do
for
> > > those
> > > > not as stupid as you.
> > >
> > > Still backtracking I see. You gotta love it ...
> >
> > You mean 'backpacking' don't you? It's just as meaningful as
> whatever
> > it is you said!
>
> No, two entirely different words. One describes your actions the
> other is another example of how you do the first.

And da blubba esto la flubba delayte gu pubba silozubba. You are

such

a tootsie pop!

What was that I said about content ... I figured Robbie would have
trouble understanding a complex sentence. He came through just as I
expected. You gotta love it ...

> > > > > > The same with your sacred polls. Who wants to be

bothered

> > > > > > by a phone call that doesn't help you when you're doing
> > > something
> > > > > > more important? So the natural response would be to say
> > > something
> > > > > > negative. People LOVE to find something wrong with the
> status
> > > > quo.
> > > > > > Kerry was a shining example of how trying to make
something
> > > real
> > > > > out
> > > > > > of that backfired.
> > > > >
> > > > > If that is true, I wonder why ALL politicians follow the
> polls
> > > like
> > > > > hawks? Of course, if you didn't continue to make such
idiotic
> > > > > statements where would we get our entertainment ... you
gotta
> > > love
> > > > > it ...
> > > >
> > > > You know that ALL politicians 'follow polls like hawks'??
> Submit
> > > > evidence to support that assertion.
> > >
> > > Just watch the news, little man. It's been on every network

for

> > days
> > > now. You must actually enjoy making foolish statements.
> >
> > I did. nothing about how "ALL politicians follow polls like
hawks"!
> > see what happens when you make it up as you go?? Will you ever
> learn?
>
> LMAO. Nice try, but anyone reading this has already seen all the
> coverage on TV. They are smart enough to understand what it means
> even if you aren't.

Here'a what i just saw. there was another poll on the eavesdropping
issue. A whole 1000 people were polled! I don't even know the

result

because after i heard that I ignored the nonsense. Either way it
means nothing. Exactly why the great GWB pays zero attention to

them.

THAT'S what you gotta love!

So little time, so much ignorance. How sweet it is ...

>
> > >
> > > > > > > > > Yes it is archived. In the LVA forums, much to

your

> > > > chagrin.
> > > > > > You
> > > > > > > > > gotta love it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If you kept up to date you'd see half of my input

was

> > > > deleted,
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > only AFTER the managing editor read every bit of it
and
> > > > > verified
> > > > > > > > every fact told in my column. sorry little dicky---
you
> > > almost
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > > my
> > > > > > > > sympathy.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Then let's hear from him. Does he have an allegy to
> > keyboards.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have no idea nor do I care! What I do know is that no
> > matter
> > > if
> > > > > he
> > > > > > or anyone there came on with a post that again stuck a
> knife
> > in
> > > > > your
> > > > > > heart, you'd do what you and all nerds always do when
faced
> > > with
> > > > > > reality: Claim it wasn't actually who he or she said it
was
> > > > because
> > > > > > it's the only way you could ever live with yourself.
> > > > >
> > > > > Of course we'd want verification. Your own history of
posting
> > > with
> > > > > multiple ids makes that necessary. However, I would be
happy
> to
> > > > meet them in person and verify their credentials. Bring 'em
on.
> > > >
> > > > You can't even meet with ME without scampering away at the
last
> > > > minute! What would you do with someone who still has the
> > > opportunity
> > > > to find out what a fake and liar you are in person??!!
> > >
> > > Bring 'em on ... or was this just another lie?
> >
> > Answer the question and stop scampering away.
>
> There was no question, only your typical babbles and now another
> effort to avoid the issue. If anyone at GT can verify your claims
> let's hear from them.

Um, I don't summons them to the Internet.

If your going to use someone to support your assertions then you
better be able to have them do it. Otherwise, you are just blowing
smoke ... which we already knew anyway.

Wait until you're in town
and then go over and ask around. You wouldn't believe anyone anyway
unless they were in the office when they made you look stupid. The
only way I can be sure you were stomped on is by verification that
you were there.

Sounds like Robbie already knows they wouldn't support him.

>
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > It is very telling that NO ONE has come on

here

> > > > > supporting
> > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > > viewpoint and been willing to debate the

facts.

> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > That's because no one's as smart as me.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The man that doesn't even understand

what "hollow"

> > means.
> > > > > LMAO.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And you're basing your neurosis on someone who has
from
> 1
> > > to
> > > > 20
> > > > > > > > people fall for something that made this guy
millions???
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Two separate items. Are you really this slow?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When you make no sense, yes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Kevin Trudeau wrote a scam book, has a newsletter and
> maintains
> > a
> > > > > website. Sound familiar? Phishing is another con for
identity
> > > > theft.
> > > > > Two separate topics, both are cons.
> > > >
> > > > I've never heard of him and you label him a scammer without
> > knowing
> > > > anything about what he says. All you do is make believe you
> know
> > > more
> > > > than him like you do on ALL the sites. Too bad as soon as

you

> > open
> > > > your mouth the first thing that comes out is your foot.
> > >
> > > LMAO. Trudeau has done the 1/2 hour TV promos many times. If
you
> > > didn't live in a cave you probably would have heard him by

now.

> All
> > > you have to do is hear him talk to see how much you two are
alike.
> >
> > This is hardly a cave and I've never heard of him. Is he a

geek?

>
> He is a con man. Only he makes millions.

Prove he is a con man, and then eh-em....prove he has made

millions!

http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Health/story?id=1527774

> > ROTFLMAO. Sorry moron, a vote is a vote. The candidiate with

the

> most
> > votes in a state gets ALL the electoral votes from that state.
> > Candidates may highlight their positions on different issues in
> > different states (usually based on polls) but no one's vote
counts
> > more than any other. Don't you just love it when Robbie tries

to

> > backtrack after making one stupid remark by making even more
stupid
> > remarks.
>
> I see why you're sorry. You can't figure it out even when it's
> spelled out for you in your own language!

My language is English. Let me know when "it's spelled out".

> Oh, and re-read your
> nonsense again and then tell us just who is the genius. I'm
> supposedly "bactracking" by making "even more remarks"!!

HAHAHAHA!

Your idiotic remarks are backtracking when they don't support your
previous remarks. You really are quite dumb.

Is that geek-logic or something?? How can anything be 'backtracking'
when it doesn't support what was previously said?? If you just got
off the boat i'd understand, but how can you take this abuse???

> You are sooo easy to make a fool of. It's beginning to not even

be

a
> challenge any more. Woe is me.....

CC. It's not even fair to call your remarks impotent anymore. That
would be too kind. They are so lacking of any content that all one
can do is sit and laugh.

Now you're into "and as a side thought...." You're joking, right?

> >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > That's why it's possible--although not very likely--
> > > > > > > to lose the popular vote while winning the electoral.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, Gore got more votes than Bush?
> > > > >
> > > > > Could be, but then again, what type of voters would ever
vote
> > for
> > > a
> > > > > cornball coward like Gore??
> > > >
> > > > Over 50% of the voters.
> > >
> > > Right, and that alone tells you how they screwed it all up

for

> him.
> > > With that kind of meaningless voters on his side, we'll give
him
> > the
> > > popular vote every day.
> >
> > All it would have taken is a few more "meaningless" votes in
> Florida and your hero would never have been elected.
>
> Don't you just love fate! Blame your boy Clinton the Clitoris for
> Gore's defeat.

Clinton was never my boy. Are you so completely brain dead you

forgot

I NEVER voted for him.

Exactly what i'd say if I were a Gore supporter!

>
> > > > > > > It's the same
> > > > > > > situation we have on the streets. You get a TV

eyefull

> > > whenever
> > > > > > > there's a protest against the war or Bush or

whatever.

> But
> > > the
> > > > > > reason
> > > > > > > the protests are always so meaningless is because
they're
> > > > > comprised
> > > > > > > of hippies, queers, long-hairs, the unemployed, the
> > frazzled,
> > > a
> > > > > few
> > > > > > > fading Hollywood stars, and a plethora of those who
have
> a
> > > bad
> > > > > life
> > > > > > > going on because they were too lazy to work hard

enough

> to
> > > get
> > > > > > > anywhere.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Did you think babbling would convince anyone? A vote is

a

> > vote.
> > > > > > Period.
> > > > >
> > > > > It certainly got your attention!! And think what it will

do

> for
> > > > those
> > > > > not as stupid as you.
> > > >
> > > > Still backtracking I see. You gotta love it ...
> > >
> > > You mean 'backpacking' don't you? It's just as meaningful as
> > whatever
> > > it is you said!
> >
> > No, two entirely different words. One describes your actions

the

> > other is another example of how you do the first.
>
> And da blubba esto la flubba delayte gu pubba silozubba. You are
such
> a tootsie pop!

What was that I said about content ... I figured Robbie would have
trouble understanding a complex sentence. He came through just as I
expected. You gotta love it ...

GOTCHA!!

>
> > > > > > > The same with your sacred polls. Who wants to be
bothered
> > > > > > > by a phone call that doesn't help you when you're

doing

> > > > something
> > > > > > > more important? So the natural response would be to

say

> > > > something
> > > > > > > negative. People LOVE to find something wrong with

the

> > status
> > > > > quo.
> > > > > > > Kerry was a shining example of how trying to make
> something
> > > > real
> > > > > > out
> > > > > > > of that backfired.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If that is true, I wonder why ALL politicians follow

the

> > polls
> > > > like
> > > > > > hawks? Of course, if you didn't continue to make such
> idiotic
> > > > > > statements where would we get our entertainment ... you
> gotta
> > > > love
> > > > > > it ...
> > > > >
> > > > > You know that ALL politicians 'follow polls like hawks'??
> > Submit
> > > > > evidence to support that assertion.
> > > >
> > > > Just watch the news, little man. It's been on every network
for
> > > days
> > > > now. You must actually enjoy making foolish statements.
> > >
> > > I did. nothing about how "ALL politicians follow polls like
> hawks"!
> > > see what happens when you make it up as you go?? Will you

ever

> > learn?
> >
> > LMAO. Nice try, but anyone reading this has already seen all

the

> > coverage on TV. They are smart enough to understand what it

means

> > even if you aren't.
>
> Here'a what i just saw. there was another poll on the

eavesdropping

> issue. A whole 1000 people were polled! I don't even know the
result
> because after i heard that I ignored the nonsense. Either way it
> means nothing. Exactly why the great GWB pays zero attention to
them.
> THAT'S what you gotta love!

So little time, so much ignorance. How sweet it is ...

> >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yes it is archived. In the LVA forums, much to
your
> > > > > chagrin.
> > > > > > > You
> > > > > > > > > > gotta love it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If you kept up to date you'd see half of my input
was
> > > > > deleted,
> > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > only AFTER the managing editor read every bit of

it

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

> and
> > > > > > verified
> > > > > > > > > every fact told in my column. sorry little dicky--

-

> you
> > > > almost
> > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > my
> > > > > > > > > sympathy.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Then let's hear from him. Does he have an allegy to
> > > keyboards.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have no idea nor do I care! What I do know is that

no

> > > matter
> > > > if
> > > > > > he
> > > > > > > or anyone there came on with a post that again stuck

a

> > knife
> > > in
> > > > > > your
> > > > > > > heart, you'd do what you and all nerds always do when
> faced
> > > > with
> > > > > > > reality: Claim it wasn't actually who he or she said

it

> was
> > > > > because
> > > > > > > it's the only way you could ever live with yourself.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Of course we'd want verification. Your own history of
> posting
> > > > with
> > > > > > multiple ids makes that necessary. However, I would be
> happy
> > to
> > > > > meet them in person and verify their credentials.

Bring 'em

> on.
> > > > >
> > > > > You can't even meet with ME without scampering away at

the

> last
> > > > > minute! What would you do with someone who still has the
> > > > opportunity
> > > > > to find out what a fake and liar you are in person??!!
> > > >
> > > > Bring 'em on ... or was this just another lie?
> > >
> > > Answer the question and stop scampering away.
> >
> > There was no question, only your typical babbles and now

another

> > effort to avoid the issue. If anyone at GT can verify your

claims

> > let's hear from them.
>
> Um, I don't summons them to the Internet.

If your going to use someone to support your assertions then you
better be able to have them do it. Otherwise, you are just blowing
smoke ... which we already knew anyway.

> Wait until you're in town
> and then go over and ask around. You wouldn't believe anyone

anyway

> unless they were in the office when they made you look stupid.

The

> only way I can be sure you were stomped on is by verification

that

> you were there.

Sounds like Robbie already knows they wouldn't support him.

After all that nervous writing, are you saying you'll visit them or
you won't? It really not all that hard to be clear....even when
stumbling around in a frustrated tirade.

> >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > It is very telling that NO ONE has come on
here
> > > > > > supporting
> > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > > > viewpoint and been willing to debate the
facts.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > That's because no one's as smart as me.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The man that doesn't even understand
what "hollow"
> > > means.
> > > > > > LMAO.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > And you're basing your neurosis on someone who

has

> from
> > 1
> > > > to
> > > > > 20
> > > > > > > > > people fall for something that made this guy
> millions???
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Two separate items. Are you really this slow?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When you make no sense, yes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kevin Trudeau wrote a scam book, has a newsletter and
> > maintains
> > > a
> > > > > > website. Sound familiar? Phishing is another con for
> identity
> > > > > theft.
> > > > > > Two separate topics, both are cons.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've never heard of him and you label him a scammer

without

> > > knowing
> > > > > anything about what he says. All you do is make believe

you

> > know
> > > > more
> > > > > than him like you do on ALL the sites. Too bad as soon as
you
> > > open
> > > > > your mouth the first thing that comes out is your foot.
> > > >
> > > > LMAO. Trudeau has done the 1/2 hour TV promos many times.

If

> you
> > > > didn't live in a cave you probably would have heard him by
now.
> > All
> > > > you have to do is hear him talk to see how much you two are
> alike.
> > >
> > > This is hardly a cave and I've never heard of him. Is he a
geek?
> >
> > He is a con man. Only he makes millions.
>
> Prove he is a con man, and then eh-em....prove he has made
millions!

http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Health/story?id=1527774

Is this supposed to mean that "ABC News" doesn't tell tall tales??
hahahahaha!

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > ROTFLMAO. Sorry moron, a vote is a vote. The candidiate with
the
> > most
> > > votes in a state gets ALL the electoral votes from that

state.

> > > Candidates may highlight their positions on different issues

in

> > > different states (usually based on polls) but no one's vote
> counts
> > > more than any other. Don't you just love it when Robbie tries
to
> > > backtrack after making one stupid remark by making even more
> stupid
> > > remarks.
> >
> > I see why you're sorry. You can't figure it out even when it's
> > spelled out for you in your own language!
>
> My language is English. Let me know when "it's spelled out".
>
> > Oh, and re-read your
> > nonsense again and then tell us just who is the genius. I'm
> > supposedly "bactracking" by making "even more remarks"!!
HAHAHAHA!
>
> Your idiotic remarks are backtracking when they don't support

your

> previous remarks. You really are quite dumb.

Is that geek-logic or something?? How can anything

be 'backtracking'

when it doesn't support what was previously said?? If you just got
off the boat i'd understand, but how can you take this abuse???

It seems little Robbie is having a confusion attack. So be it. I
guess I'll need to use shorter words in the future.

>
> > You are sooo easy to make a fool of. It's beginning to not even
be
> a
> > challenge any more. Woe is me.....
>
> CC. It's not even fair to call your remarks impotent anymore.

That

> would be too kind. They are so lacking of any content that all

one

> can do is sit and laugh.

Now you're into "and as a side thought...." You're joking, right?

Just the facts, as usual.

>
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > That's why it's possible--although not very likely--
> > > > > > > > to lose the popular vote while winning the

electoral.

> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, Gore got more votes than Bush?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could be, but then again, what type of voters would

ever

> vote
> > > for
> > > > a
> > > > > > cornball coward like Gore??
> > > > >
> > > > > Over 50% of the voters.
> > > >
> > > > Right, and that alone tells you how they screwed it all up
for
> > him.
> > > > With that kind of meaningless voters on his side, we'll

give

> him
> > > the
> > > > popular vote every day.
> > >
> > > All it would have taken is a few more "meaningless" votes in
> > Florida and your hero would never have been elected.
> >
> > Don't you just love fate! Blame your boy Clinton the Clitoris

for

> > Gore's defeat.
>
> Clinton was never my boy. Are you so completely brain dead you
forgot
> I NEVER voted for him.

Exactly what i'd say if I were a Gore supporter!

I didn't know you were a Gore supported.

>
> >
> > > > > > > > It's the same
> > > > > > > > situation we have on the streets. You get a TV
eyefull
> > > > whenever
> > > > > > > > there's a protest against the war or Bush or
whatever.
> > But
> > > > the
> > > > > > > reason
> > > > > > > > the protests are always so meaningless is because
> they're
> > > > > > comprised
> > > > > > > > of hippies, queers, long-hairs, the unemployed, the
> > > frazzled,
> > > > a
> > > > > > few
> > > > > > > > fading Hollywood stars, and a plethora of those who
> have
> > a
> > > > bad
> > > > > > life
> > > > > > > > going on because they were too lazy to work hard
enough
> > to
> > > > get
> > > > > > > > anywhere.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Did you think babbling would convince anyone? A vote

is

a
> > > vote.
> > > > > > > Period.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It certainly got your attention!! And think what it

will

do
> > for
> > > > > those
> > > > > > not as stupid as you.
> > > > >
> > > > > Still backtracking I see. You gotta love it ...
> > > >
> > > > You mean 'backpacking' don't you? It's just as meaningful

as

> > > whatever
> > > > it is you said!
> > >
> > > No, two entirely different words. One describes your actions
the
> > > other is another example of how you do the first.
> >
> > And da blubba esto la flubba delayte gu pubba silozubba. You

are

> such
> > a tootsie pop!
>
> What was that I said about content ... I figured Robbie would

have

> trouble understanding a complex sentence. He came through just as

I

> expected. You gotta love it ...

GOTCHA!!

RIV.

> > > > > > > > > > > Yes it is archived. In the LVA forums, much

to

> your
> > > > > > chagrin.
> > > > > > > > You
> > > > > > > > > > > gotta love it.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If you kept up to date you'd see half of my

input

> was
> > > > > > deleted,
> > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > only AFTER the managing editor read every bit

of

it
> > and
> > > > > > > verified
> > > > > > > > > > every fact told in my column. sorry little

dicky--

-
> > you
> > > > > almost
> > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > my
> > > > > > > > > > sympathy.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Then let's hear from him. Does he have an allegy

to

> > > > keyboards.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have no idea nor do I care! What I do know is

that

no
> > > > matter
> > > > > if
> > > > > > > he
> > > > > > > > or anyone there came on with a post that again

stuck

a
> > > knife
> > > > in
> > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > heart, you'd do what you and all nerds always do

when

> > faced
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > > reality: Claim it wasn't actually who he or she

said

it
> > was
> > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > it's the only way you could ever live with yourself.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Of course we'd want verification. Your own history of
> > posting
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > multiple ids makes that necessary. However, I would

be

> > happy
> > > to
> > > > > > meet them in person and verify their credentials.
Bring 'em
> > on.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can't even meet with ME without scampering away at
the
> > last
> > > > > > minute! What would you do with someone who still has

the

> > > > > opportunity
> > > > > > to find out what a fake and liar you are in person??!!
> > > > >
> > > > > Bring 'em on ... or was this just another lie?
> > > >
> > > > Answer the question and stop scampering away.
> > >
> > > There was no question, only your typical babbles and now
another
> > > effort to avoid the issue. If anyone at GT can verify your
claims
> > > let's hear from them.
> >
> > Um, I don't summons them to the Internet.
>
> If your going to use someone to support your assertions then you
> better be able to have them do it. Otherwise, you are just

blowing

> smoke ... which we already knew anyway.
>
> > Wait until you're in town
> > and then go over and ask around. You wouldn't believe anyone
anyway
> > unless they were in the office when they made you look stupid.
The
> > only way I can be sure you were stomped on is by verification
that
> > you were there.
>
> Sounds like Robbie already knows they wouldn't support him.

After all that nervous writing, are you saying you'll visit them or
you won't? It really not all that hard to be clear....even when
stumbling around in a frustrated tirade.

All you need to do is have them post verification of your claims
right here ... then I will meet with them.

>
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It is very telling that NO ONE has come

on

> here
> > > > > > > supporting
> > > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > > > > viewpoint and been willing to debate the
> facts.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > That's because no one's as smart as me.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The man that doesn't even understand
> what "hollow"
> > > > means.
> > > > > > > LMAO.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > And you're basing your neurosis on someone who
has
> > from
> > > 1
> > > > > to
> > > > > > 20
> > > > > > > > > > people fall for something that made this guy
> > millions???
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Two separate items. Are you really this slow?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > When you make no sense, yes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Kevin Trudeau wrote a scam book, has a newsletter and
> > > maintains
> > > > a
> > > > > > > website. Sound familiar? Phishing is another con for
> > identity
> > > > > > theft.
> > > > > > > Two separate topics, both are cons.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've never heard of him and you label him a scammer
without
> > > > knowing
> > > > > > anything about what he says. All you do is make believe
you
> > > know
> > > > > more
> > > > > > than him like you do on ALL the sites. Too bad as soon

as

> you
> > > > open
> > > > > > your mouth the first thing that comes out is your foot.
> > > > >
> > > > > LMAO. Trudeau has done the 1/2 hour TV promos many times.
If
> > you
> > > > > didn't live in a cave you probably would have heard him

by

> now.
> > > All
> > > > > you have to do is hear him talk to see how much you two

are

> > alike.
> > > >
> > > > This is hardly a cave and I've never heard of him. Is he a
> geek?
> > >
> > > He is a con man. Only he makes millions.
> >
> > Prove he is a con man, and then eh-em....prove he has made
> millions!
>
> http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Health/story?id=1527774

Is this supposed to mean that "ABC News" doesn't tell tall tales??
hahahahaha!

You asked for proof, you received proof. You are now looking like a
complete imbecile for denying it. How sweet it is ...

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > ROTFLMAO. Sorry moron, a vote is a vote. The candidiate

with

> the
> > > most
> > > > votes in a state gets ALL the electoral votes from that
state.
> > > > Candidates may highlight their positions on different

issues

in
> > > > different states (usually based on polls) but no one's vote
> > counts
> > > > more than any other. Don't you just love it when Robbie

tries

> to
> > > > backtrack after making one stupid remark by making even

more

> > stupid
> > > > remarks.
> > >
> > > I see why you're sorry. You can't figure it out even when

it's

> > > spelled out for you in your own language!
> >
> > My language is English. Let me know when "it's spelled out".
> >
> > > Oh, and re-read your
> > > nonsense again and then tell us just who is the genius. I'm
> > > supposedly "bactracking" by making "even more remarks"!!
> HAHAHAHA!
> >
> > Your idiotic remarks are backtracking when they don't support
your
> > previous remarks. You really are quite dumb.
>
> Is that geek-logic or something?? How can anything
be 'backtracking'
> when it doesn't support what was previously said?? If you just

got

> off the boat i'd understand, but how can you take this abuse???

It seems little Robbie is having a confusion attack. So be it. I
guess I'll need to use shorter words in the future.

Just as I thought. The future is now and he still can't explain the
flaw I found in his babbling.

> > > > All it would have taken is a few more "meaningless" votes

in

> > > Florida and your hero would never have been elected.
> > >
> > > Don't you just love fate! Blame your boy Clinton the Clitoris
for
> > > Gore's defeat.
> >
> > Clinton was never my boy. Are you so completely brain dead you
> forgot
> > I NEVER voted for him.
>
> Exactly what i'd say if I were a Gore supporter!

I didn't know you were a Gore supported.

Does 'if' ring a bell in that empty space on your neck?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > > ROTFLMAO. Sorry moron, a vote is a vote. The candidiate
with
> > the
> > > > most
> > > > > votes in a state gets ALL the electoral votes from that
> state.
> > > > > Candidates may highlight their positions on different
issues
> in
> > > > > different states (usually based on polls) but no one's

vote

> > > counts
> > > > > more than any other. Don't you just love it when Robbie
tries
> > to
> > > > > backtrack after making one stupid remark by making even
more
> > > stupid
> > > > > remarks.
> > > >
> > > > I see why you're sorry. You can't figure it out even when
it's
> > > > spelled out for you in your own language!
> > >
> > > My language is English. Let me know when "it's spelled out".
> > >
> > > > Oh, and re-read your
> > > > nonsense again and then tell us just who is the genius. I'm
> > > > supposedly "bactracking" by making "even more remarks"!!
> > HAHAHAHA!
> > >
> > > Your idiotic remarks are backtracking when they don't support
> your
> > > previous remarks. You really are quite dumb.
> >
> > Is that geek-logic or something?? How can anything
> be 'backtracking'
> > when it doesn't support what was previously said?? If you just
got
> > off the boat i'd understand, but how can you take this abuse???
>
> It seems little Robbie is having a confusion attack. So be it. I
> guess I'll need to use shorter words in the future.

Just as I thought. The future is now and he still can't explain the
flaw I found in his babbling.

You found no flaw. You backtracked from my articulation of electoral
voting to something you made up ... "sectoral voting". Even the
closest interpretation of this nonsense ... voting blocs ... has
nothing to do with the electoral college. One vote still remains one
vote and the man who gets the most votes in a given state gets the
electoral vote.

> > > > > All it would have taken is a few more "meaningless" votes
in
> > > > Florida and your hero would never have been elected.
> > > >
> > > > Don't you just love fate! Blame your boy Clinton the

Clitoris

> for
> > > > Gore's defeat.
> > >
> > > Clinton was never my boy. Are you so completely brain dead

you

> > forgot
> > > I NEVER voted for him.
> >
> > Exactly what i'd say if I were a Gore supporter!
>
> I didn't know you were a Gore supported.

Does 'if' ring a bell in that empty space on your neck?

I ignored it just as you ignored the word "NEVER". What goes around
comes around.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > > > ROTFLMAO. Sorry moron, a vote is a vote. The candidiate
> with
> > > the
> > > > > most
> > > > > > votes in a state gets ALL the electoral votes from that
> > state.
> > > > > > Candidates may highlight their positions on different
> issues
> > in
> > > > > > different states (usually based on polls) but no one's
vote
> > > > counts
> > > > > > more than any other. Don't you just love it when Robbie
> tries
> > > to
> > > > > > backtrack after making one stupid remark by making even
> more
> > > > stupid
> > > > > > remarks.
> > > > >
> > > > > I see why you're sorry. You can't figure it out even when
> it's
> > > > > spelled out for you in your own language!
> > > >
> > > > My language is English. Let me know when "it's spelled out".
> > > >
> > > > > Oh, and re-read your
> > > > > nonsense again and then tell us just who is the genius.

I'm

> > > > > supposedly "bactracking" by making "even more remarks"!!
> > > HAHAHAHA!
> > > >
> > > > Your idiotic remarks are backtracking when they don't

support

> > your
> > > > previous remarks. You really are quite dumb.
> > >
> > > Is that geek-logic or something?? How can anything
> > be 'backtracking'
> > > when it doesn't support what was previously said?? If you

just

> got
> > > off the boat i'd understand, but how can you take this

abuse???

> > It seems little Robbie is having a confusion attack. So be it.

I guess I'll need to use shorter words in the future.

> Just as I thought. The future is now and he still can't explain

the flaw I found in his babbling.

You found no flaw. You backtracked from my articulation of

electoral voting to something you made up ... "sectoral voting". Even
the closest interpretation of this nonsense ... voting blocs ... has

nothing to do with the electoral college. One vote still remains

one vote and the man who gets the most votes in a given state gets
the electoral vote.

Now you've gone full circle in your weak attempt at covering your
butt on this. A humma a humma a humma is a tell-tale sign that you're
struggling to find the right words when all you can do is repeat
mine. Strike 3 call!

> > > > > > All it would have taken is a few more "meaningless"

votes

> in
> > > > > Florida and your hero would never have been elected.
> > > > >
> > > > > Don't you just love fate! Blame your boy Clinton the
Clitoris
> > for
> > > > > Gore's defeat.
> > > >
> > > > Clinton was never my boy. Are you so completely brain dead
you
> > > forgot
> > > > I NEVER voted for him.
> > >
> > > Exactly what i'd say if I were a Gore supporter!
> >
> > I didn't know you were a Gore supported.
>
> Does 'if' ring a bell in that empty space on your neck?

I ignored it just as you ignored the word "NEVER". What goes around
comes around.

You can't even get that thing right. 'What goes around comes around'
is what happens when you stick someone with something particular and
the exact same thing bites the other guy in the butt a bit later.
Your oranges & apples iteration doesn't cut it.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > > > > ROTFLMAO. Sorry moron, a vote is a vote. The

candidiate

> > with
> > > > the
> > > > > > most
> > > > > > > votes in a state gets ALL the electoral votes from

that

> > > state.
> > > > > > > Candidates may highlight their positions on different
> > issues
> > > in
> > > > > > > different states (usually based on polls) but no

one's

> vote
> > > > > counts
> > > > > > > more than any other. Don't you just love it when

Robbie

> > tries
> > > > to
> > > > > > > backtrack after making one stupid remark by making

even

> > more
> > > > > stupid
> > > > > > > remarks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I see why you're sorry. You can't figure it out even

when

> > it's
> > > > > > spelled out for you in your own language!
> > > > >
> > > > > My language is English. Let me know when "it's spelled

out".

> > > > >
> > > > > > Oh, and re-read your
> > > > > > nonsense again and then tell us just who is the genius.
I'm
> > > > > > supposedly "bactracking" by making "even more

remarks"!!

> > > > HAHAHAHA!
> > > > >
> > > > > Your idiotic remarks are backtracking when they don't
support
> > > your
> > > > > previous remarks. You really are quite dumb.
> > > >
> > > > Is that geek-logic or something?? How can anything
> > > be 'backtracking'
> > > > when it doesn't support what was previously said?? If you
just
> > got
> > > > off the boat i'd understand, but how can you take this
abuse???

> > > It seems little Robbie is having a confusion attack. So be

it.

I guess I'll need to use shorter words in the future.

> > Just as I thought. The future is now and he still can't explain
the flaw I found in his babbling.

> You found no flaw. You backtracked from my articulation of
electoral voting to something you made up ... "sectoral voting".

Even

the closest interpretation of this nonsense ... voting blocs ...

has

> nothing to do with the electoral college. One vote still remains
one vote and the man who gets the most votes in a given state gets
the electoral vote.

Now you've gone full circle in your weak attempt at covering your
butt on this. A humma a humma a humma is a tell-tale sign that

you're

struggling to find the right words when all you can do is repeat
mine. Strike 3 call!

RIV once again. I caught little Robbie lying and trying to cover it
up. The best he can do is describe himself for all to see.

> > > > > > > All it would have taken is a few more "meaningless"
votes
> > in
> > > > > > Florida and your hero would never have been elected.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Don't you just love fate! Blame your boy Clinton the
> Clitoris
> > > for
> > > > > > Gore's defeat.
> > > > >
> > > > > Clinton was never my boy. Are you so completely brain

dead

> you
> > > > forgot
> > > > > I NEVER voted for him.
> > > >
> > > > Exactly what i'd say if I were a Gore supporter!
> > >
> > > I didn't know you were a Gore supported.
> >
> > Does 'if' ring a bell in that empty space on your neck?
>
> I ignored it just as you ignored the word "NEVER". What goes

around

> comes around.

You can't even get that thing right. 'What goes around comes

around'

is what happens when you stick someone with something particular

and

the exact same thing bites the other guy in the butt a bit later.
Your oranges & apples iteration doesn't cut it.

Your point? You just described what happened. You must cherish
looking stupid in front of everyone.

> > > > > > Clinton was never my boy. Are you so completely brain
dead
> > you
> > > > > forgot
> > > > > > I NEVER voted for him.
> > > > >
> > > > > Exactly what i'd say if I were a Gore supporter!
> > > >
> > > > I didn't know you were a Gore supported.

> > > Does 'if' ring a bell in that empty space on your neck?

> > I ignored it just as you ignored the word "NEVER". What goes
around comes around.

> You can't even get that thing right. 'What goes around comes
around' is what happens when you stick someone with something

particular and the exact same thing bites the other guy in the butt a
bit later. Your oranges & apples iteration doesn't cut it.

Your point? You just described what happened. You must cherish
looking stupid in front of everyone.

Let me know when you're in town here passing thru on one of
your 'bowling' extravaganzas. I'll let you in on a little secrect
about apples & oranges.....

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote: