vpFREE2 Forums

“I don’t know Dr. Hartley ... I just HATE the holidays”

Am I the only one reading these exchanges reminded of the old Bob
Newhart Show?

In one of the best televisions sit-coms of all time, Bob Newhart
plays Dr. Bob Hartley, a clinical psychologist with a practice full
of comedic loonies including Mr.Carlin who was the craziest of all
his patients. Mr. Carlin was a hopeless case, but the two somehow
forged a bizarre therapeutic relationship that was both funny and
bittersweet.

I see Dick as the understanding and patient Dr. Hartley with Singer
as a more malevolent Carlin, both full of himself and suffering from
low self-esteem (and also quite hopeless). Because the show was pure
fiction, it was easy to laugh and be entertained, but that's more
difficult with these exchanges as they are reality-based, with Mr.
Regular Guy coming across as far more mental (especially when drunk)
than funny.

This latest episode might be titled "Holiday Season turns Ugly for
Singer."

I just noticed....it took this goofball from 4:19 to 5pm to write 3
short & sweet replies. Oh, how I must be inside his head!!

Am I the only one reading these exchanges reminded of the old Bob
Newhart Show?

In one of the best televisions sit-coms of all time, Bob Newhart
plays Dr. Bob Hartley, a clinical psychologist with a practice full
of comedic loonies including Mr.Carlin who was the craziest of all
his patients. Mr. Carlin was a hopeless case, but the two somehow
forged a bizarre therapeutic relationship that was both funny and
bittersweet.

I see Dick as the understanding and patient Dr. Hartley with Singer
as a more malevolent Carlin, both full of himself and suffering

from

low self-esteem (and also quite hopeless). Because the show was

pure

fiction, it was easy to laugh and be entertained, but that's more
difficult with these exchanges as they are reality-based, with Mr.
Regular Guy coming across as far more mental (especially when

drunk)

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "2-WILD" <lucky4K@...> wrote:

than funny.

This latest episode might be titled "Holiday Season turns Ugly for
Singer."

LOL! More projection.

Obviously my Carlin comparison hit Mr. Ugly Holiday Season right
between the eyes.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:

Oh, how I must be inside his head!!

>
> Am I the only one reading these exchanges reminded of the old Bob
> Newhart Show?
>
> In one of the best televisions sit-coms of all time, Bob Newhart
> plays Dr. Bob Hartley, a clinical psychologist with a practice

full

> of comedic loonies including Mr.Carlin who was the craziest of

all

> his patients. Mr. Carlin was a hopeless case, but the two

somehow

> forged a bizarre therapeutic relationship that was both funny and
> bittersweet.
>
> I see Dick as the understanding and patient Dr. Hartley with

Singer

> as a more malevolent Carlin, both full of himself and suffering
from
> low self-esteem (and also quite hopeless). Because the show was
pure
> fiction, it was easy to laugh and be entertained, but that's more
> difficult with these exchanges as they are reality-based, with

Mr.

> Regular Guy coming across as far more mental (especially when
drunk)
> than funny.
>
> This latest episode might be titled "Holiday Season turns Ugly

for

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "2-WILD" <lucky4K@> wrote:
> Singer."
>

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111" <robsinger1111@...>
wrote:

I just noticed....it took this goofball from 4:19 to 5pm to write 3
short & sweet replies.

Now it appears Rob is claiming to be all seeing ... how else would he
have known? Or else, wonder of wonders, he may have been doing
something else at the same time. Of course, multi-tasking is probably
beyond Rob's capabilities ... unless we consider boozing it up as a
task.

Let's see creating my past two posts I was eating lunch, watching
football, watching a movie, going over email and looking at two other
forums. I think Rob just informed us who the real "goofball" is.

Holiday Season right between the eyes.

....I don't think he liked that :slight_smile:

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "2-WILD" <lucky4K@...> wrote:

LOL! More projection.Obviously my Carlin comparison hit Mr. Ugly

For once we get a splinter of truth from Rob ... "Looking for hot
cycles is a waste of time". Since they don't exist that is pretty
much a given. Don't you feel a bit foolish, Robbie, when one of your
lies completely exposes your other lies. You gotta love it ...

What I feel is more intelligent and far more capable and successful
seeing you trying to double-talk your way around what you know is the
truth--when you REALLY wish and hope it would be the desperate
scenario you made up.

Now it appears Rob is claiming to be all seeing ... how else would

he have known? Or else, wonder of wonders, he may have been doing

something else at the same time. Of course, multi-tasking is

probably beyond Rob's capabilities ... unless we consider boozing it
up as a task. Let's see creating my past two posts I was eating
lunch, watching football, watching a movie, going over email and
looking at two other forums. I think Rob just informed us who the
real "goofball" is.

One of the more satisfying events here is watching two similarly-
driven envious fools do their best to build the Singer-shaken
confidence levels of one another. And whenever Dick writes endless
babble as above he's straining for dfinition--it's almost hard to
watch.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:

For once we get a splinter of truth from Rob ... "Looking for hot
cycles is a waste of time". Since they don't exist that is pretty
much a given. Don't you feel a bit foolish, Robbie, when one of your
lies completely exposes your other lies. You gotta love it ...

What I feel is more intelligent and far more capable and successful
seeing you trying to double-talk your way around what you know is

the

truth--when you REALLY wish and hope it would be the desperate
scenario you made up.

ROTFLMAO. Yes, I know there's no such thing as hot cycles because it
would be illegal. I also see you're still in "projection" mode.

As for "intelligent" ... well, do your really think you qualify when
you have made it obvious your system is a scam by going on about hot
cycles? Let's hear it again Robbie ... "please play my ultra complex
system that only wins in a (ficticious) hot cycle when a simple
method of play would clearly win more". Tooooooooooo funny.

> Now it appears Rob is claiming to be all seeing ... how else

would

he have known? Or else, wonder of wonders, he may have been doing
> something else at the same time. Of course, multi-tasking is
probably beyond Rob's capabilities ... unless we consider boozing

it

up as a task. Let's see creating my past two posts I was eating
lunch, watching football, watching a movie, going over email and
looking at two other forums. I think Rob just informed us who the
real "goofball" is.

One of the more satisfying events here is watching two similarly-
driven envious fools do their best to build the Singer-shaken
confidence levels of one another. And whenever Dick writes endless
babble as above he's straining for dfinition--it's almost hard to
watch.

Translation: Rob understand he made another foolish post and tries
to "assert" his way out. Sorry, Robbie, but your foot is still lodged
squarely in your mouth (along with his keyboard).

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

ROTFLMAO. Yes, I know there's no such thing as hot cycles because

it would be illegal.

You mean, eh-em, like how when you speed, SPEEDING's illegal??!!
HAHAHAHA!!

I also see you're still in "projection" mode.

???

As for "intelligent" ... well, do your really think you qualify

when you have made it obvious your system is a scam by going on about
hot cycles? Let's hear it again Robbie ... "please play my ultra
complex system that only wins in a (ficticious) hot cycle when a
simple method of play would clearly win more". Tooooooooooo funny.

In other words....it's BOTHERING you!
  

> One of the more satisfying events here is watching two similarly-
> driven envious fools do their best to build the Singer-shaken
> confidence levels of one another. And whenever Dick writes

endless babble he's straining for definition--it's almost too hard to

watch.

Translation: Rob understand he made another foolish post and tries
to "assert" his way out. Sorry, Robbie, but your foot is still

lodged squarely in your mouth (along with his keyboard).

That must be something geeks say to geeks. I wonder....do they make
electronic slide rules yet where all the loner/loser (you name it)
geeks can communicate with each other? Oh, I'M on a ROLL! Somebody
STOP ME!!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:

> ROTFLMAO. Yes, I know there's no such thing as hot cycles because
it would be illegal.

You mean, eh-em, like how when you speed, SPEEDING's illegal??!!
HAHAHAHA!!

Yup. Just like speeding. You get caught and you get your licensed
suspended. Of course, since we're talking about IGT, getting their
license suspended means going out of business. Now, please, tell me
the motivation they have to illegally program their machines?

>I also see you're still in "projection" mode.

???

ROTFLMAO.

> As for "intelligent" ... well, do your really think you qualify
when you have made it obvious your system is a scam by going on

about

hot cycles? Let's hear it again Robbie ... "please play my ultra
complex system that only wins in a (ficticious) hot cycle when a
simple method of play would clearly win more". Tooooooooooo funny.

In other words....it's BOTHERING you!

It's clearly "bothering" YOU. I'm lovin' it. You've completely blown
your con with one of your lies. It just doesn't get any better than
this.

> > One of the more satisfying events here is watching two

similarly-

> > driven envious fools do their best to build the Singer-shaken
> > confidence levels of one another. And whenever Dick writes
endless babble he's straining for definition--it's almost too hard

to

> watch.

> Translation: Rob understand he made another foolish post and

tries

> to "assert" his way out. Sorry, Robbie, but your foot is still
lodged squarely in your mouth (along with his keyboard).

That must be something geeks say to geeks. I wonder....do they make
electronic slide rules yet where all the loner/loser (you name it)
geeks can communicate with each other? Oh, I'M on a ROLL! Somebody
STOP ME!!!

No need. Keep it up. I'm still lovin' it. Oh, BTW, an "electronic
slide rule" ... it's called a computer.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

Yup. Just like speeding. You get caught and you get your licensed
suspended.

So on what planet did you get YOUR license suspended for speeding??
You began 2007 talking a big game and not living up to it, and now
you're ending it folding like a lawnchair....

Of course, since we're talking about IGT, getting their

license suspended means going out of business. Now, please, tell me
the motivation they have to illegally program their machines?

We've gone over it all before---there's nothing illegal about the way
the machines are programmed to run in mostly random and infrequently
in corrective hot & cold cycles, at least in Nevada. Of course,
you're so blinded as to pretend that's the way it is in your Indian
casinos too since you can't live without them either--in Minn. or on
any road to anywhere. Needing a strong "fix" does make that a sick
reality.

> In other words....it's BOTHERING you!

It's clearly "bothering" YOU. I'm lovin' it. You've completely

blown your con with one of your lies. It just doesn't get any better
than this.

I enjoy when you exhibit how I take the lead on nearly everything you
do and say here. Imagine if there were a live crowd--how
uncomfortable you'd feel. I see hives breaking out under all that
sweat!
   

> That must be something geeks say to geeks. I wonder....do they

make electronic slide rules yet where all the loner/loser (you name
it) geeks can communicate with each other? Oh, I'M on a ROLL!
Somebody STOP ME!!!

No need. Keep it up. I'm still lovin' it. Oh, BTW, an "electronic
slide rule" ... it's called a computer.

Umm....you mean A CALCULATOR---Remember?!! HAHAHA! Mr. Wizard
stumbles over his own two feet AGAIN and it is HILARIOUS!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:

> Yup. Just like speeding. You get caught and you get your licensed
> suspended.

So on what planet did you get YOUR license suspended for speeding??
You began 2007 talking a big game and not living up to it, and now
you're ending it folding like a lawnchair....

You probably won't get your license suspended for a single speeding
incident but you will for multiple tickets right here on Earth. If
you didn't know that chalk another one up to the education of little
Robbie. However, were not talking about speeding are we. We're
talking about a company INTENTIONALLY violating state regulations.

Now, I doubt it would ever come to that. I believe the gaming board
actually reviews the code itself whch eliminates the problem
altogether.

Of course, since we're talking about IGT, getting their
> license suspended means going out of business. Now, please, tell

me

> the motivation they have to illegally program their machines?

We've gone over it all before---there's nothing illegal about the

way

the machines are programmed to run in mostly random and

infrequently

in corrective hot & cold cycles, at least in Nevada.

ROTFLMAO ... If you were only smart enough to know the term "mostly
random" is ridiculous. If something is not completely random then it
is not random at all, which would violate state regulations. But, of
course, we now know that if machines had detectable hot cycles then
your system would be completely unnecessary and actually slow down
the process of milking the cycle.

Of course,
you're so blinded as to pretend that's the way it is in your Indian
casinos too since you can't live without them either--in Minn. or

on

any road to anywhere. Needing a strong "fix" does make that a sick
reality.

Nice try at changing the subject ... "mostly random" ... that is
soooooooo funny I still have tears in my eyes.

> > In other words....it's BOTHERING you!
>
> It's clearly "bothering" YOU. I'm lovin' it. You've completely
blown your con with one of your lies. It just doesn't get any

better

than this.

I enjoy when you exhibit how I take the lead on nearly everything

you

do and say here. Imagine if there were a live crowd--how
uncomfortable you'd feel. I see hives breaking out under all that
sweat!

Oh please ... this is too much. And, people wonder why I debate you
on these forums. Where else could I get such a great laugh this eary
in the AM!

> > That must be something geeks say to geeks. I wonder....do they
make electronic slide rules yet where all the loner/loser (you name
it) geeks can communicate with each other? Oh, I'M on a ROLL!
Somebody STOP ME!!!

> No need. Keep it up. I'm still lovin' it. Oh, BTW, an "electronic
> slide rule" ... it's called a computer.

Umm....you mean A CALCULATOR---Remember?!! HAHAHA! Mr. Wizard
stumbles over his own two feet AGAIN and it is HILARIOUS!!

No a COMPUTER, or more specifically a CPU. What do you think sits
inside those scientific calcuators? It just keeps getting funnier as
Robbie makes one bonehead statement after another.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

> So on what planet did you get YOUR license suspended for

speeding?? You began 2007 talking a big game and not living up to it,
and now you're ending it folding like a lawnchair....

You probably won't get your license suspended for a single speeding
incident but you will for multiple tickets right here on Earth.

As per usual, you throw out an unsubstantiated assertion, get
clobbered by me with the facts, then you try to squirm your way out
of it. It just doesn't get any better.

However, were not talking about speeding are we. We're
talking about a company INTENTIONALLY violating state regulations.

There's nothing in "violation" as you pretend, by incorporating those
required cycles into the primary program, now is there Mr. Wizard (I
love mocking a fool!).

Now, I doubt it would ever come to that. I believe the gaming board
actually reviews the code itself whch eliminates the problem
altogether.

You bet they do, and they know a lot more than you make believe you
do.

ROTFLMAO ... If you were only smart enough to know the term "mostly
random" is ridiculous. If something is not completely random then

it is not random at all, which would violate state regulations. But,
of course, we now know that if machines had detectable hot cycles
then your system would be completely unnecessary and actually slow
down the process of milking the cycle.

Hot cycles are irrelevant to the casinos because players like you who
are addicted and who when they win they try to win more because they
just can't seem to get enough of a fix of that intermittent
satisfaction they crave, will always play right on thru big winners
or a bunch of little ones anyway--resulting in the same or bigger
loss.

And here's more education on "mostly random". Wheat Thins boxes
proclaim "0 trans fat" yet they have traces of it in their partially
hydrogenated oil (I know, I know, those who've given up on their
health like you care not about this). If you took the time to check
with NGC instead of tossing out make believe beliefs all the time
you'd find "random" is only superceeded when the holds approach out-
of-legal range play results. The term "random" still holds because it
is random the majority of the time. Accept it and live with the facts.

> Umm....you mean A CALCULATOR---Remember?!! HAHAHA! Mr. Wizard
> stumbles over his own two feet AGAIN and it is HILARIOUS!!

No a COMPUTER, or more specifically a CPU. What do you think sits
inside those scientific calcuators? It just keeps getting funnier

as Robbie makes one bonehead statement after another.

I'll leave that in there--you couldn't even save face by making a
nice try! Oh, wait a minute!! I have to go type a formula on my SLIDE
RULE!! Ooooo...Ooooo!! I remember now. When slide rules were on their
way out, they were replaced with COMPUTERS and every kid had one in
his pocket!!! Oh you are so funny when you scramble!!!!!!!!!!!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:

> > So on what planet did you get YOUR license suspended for
speeding?? You began 2007 talking a big game and not living up to

it,

and now you're ending it folding like a lawnchair....

Never has taken a "big game" to get the best of you. All anyone needs
to do is state facts.

> You probably won't get your license suspended for a single

speeding

> incident but you will for multiple tickets right here on Earth.

As per usual, you throw out an unsubstantiated assertion, get
clobbered by me with the facts, then you try to squirm your way out
of it. It just doesn't get any better.

Well, the law in MN was 3 speeding tickets in one year gets your
license suspended. Don't know about other states but I suspect they
are similar. However, since you are the king of unsubstantiated
assertions, why don't you research this one and get back to us.

> However, were not talking about speeding are we. We're
> talking about a company INTENTIONALLY violating state regulations.

There's nothing in "violation" as you pretend, by incorporating

those

required cycles into the primary program, now is there Mr. Wizard

(I

love mocking a fool!).

Of course it would be a violation. It's either random or it isn't.

> Now, I doubt it would ever come to that. I believe the gaming

board

> actually reviews the code itself whch eliminates the problem
> altogether.

You bet they do, and they know a lot more than you make believe you
do.

Yup. They know it's random. What's really funny is your arguing for a
capability that actually makes your complex progressive system
unnecessary. Amazing ...

> ROTFLMAO ... If you were only smart enough to know the

term "mostly

> random" is ridiculous. If something is not completely random then
it is not random at all, which would violate state regulations.

But,

of course, we now know that if machines had detectable hot cycles
then your system would be completely unnecessary and actually slow
down the process of milking the cycle.

Hot cycles are irrelevant to the casinos because players like you

who

are addicted and who when they win they try to win more because

they

just can't seem to get enough of a fix of that intermittent
satisfaction they crave, will always play right on thru big winners
or a bunch of little ones anyway--resulting in the same or bigger
loss.

Robbie, you really stumbled throught that one. When faced with facts
you revert to silly assertions that are totally unrelated to the
topic at hand. Don't you realize how stupid you look when you do this?

And here's more education on "mostly random". Wheat Thins boxes
proclaim "0 trans fat" yet they have traces of it in their

partially

hydrogenated oil (I know, I know, those who've given up on their
health like you care not about this).

Yup. They are following the FDA regulations just like IGT is
following NV gaming regulations. The difference is one allows
rounding down while the other has specific guidelines for randomness.
Two completely different topics. Any other idiotic comments?

If you took the time to check
with NGC instead of tossing out make believe beliefs all the time
you'd find "random" is only superceeded when the holds approach out-
of-legal range play results. The term "random" still holds because

it

is random the majority of the time. Accept it and live with the

facts.

Pure BS. If it's random then nothing else is required. In fact, the
NGC regulations clearly disallow "secondary decisions" like the one
you just made up. You really should go read reg 14. It's online so
with a little effort you can check it out for yourself.

> > Umm....you mean A CALCULATOR---Remember?!! HAHAHA! Mr. Wizard
> > stumbles over his own two feet AGAIN and it is HILARIOUS!!

> No a COMPUTER, or more specifically a CPU. What do you think sits
> inside those scientific calcuators? It just keeps getting funnier
as Robbie makes one bonehead statement after another.

I'll leave that in there--you couldn't even save face by making a
nice try! Oh, wait a minute!! I have to go type a formula on my

SLIDE

RULE!! Ooooo...Ooooo!! I remember now. When slide rules were on

their

way out, they were replaced with COMPUTERS and every kid had one in
his pocket!!! Oh you are so funny when you scramble!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yawn. You forgot to answer the question. What do you think is inside
a calcuator? Everyone else knows ... so take your time (I already
told you) ... it's a CPU. That stands for central processing unit.
You know, those little things you find in personal computers too. So,
what do you have? You have a little computer. That's all a calculator
is, Robbie, so please don't embarrass yourself any further.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

Never has taken a "big game" to get the best of you. All anyone

needs to do is state facts.

You mean, like "getting your license suspended for speeding!!?"
HAHAHA--the game to you is figuring out how many times I get you to
stuff both feet into your mouth at the same time!
  

Well, the law in MN was 3 speeding tickets in one year gets your
license suspended. Don't know about other states but I suspect they
are similar. However, since you are the king of unsubstantiated
assertions, why don't you research this one and get back to us.

Gee....too bad you didn't state multiple tickets in the first place,
but you didn't mean to, did you. In other words, you got stuck in
your own falsifications and misrepresentation, I pushed you to your
outer limits with the facts, so you came whimpering back almost
begging me to accept your reconstructed wording. I haven't seen
anyone eat that much humble pie since Tiny Tim.

> Hot cycles are irrelevant to the casinos because players like you
who are addicted and who when they win they try to win more because
they just can't seem to get enough of a fix of that intermittent
> satisfaction they crave, will always play right on thru big

winners or a bunch of little ones anyway--resulting in the same or
bigger loss.

Robbie, you really stumbled throught that one. When faced with

facts

you revert to silly assertions that are totally unrelated to the
topic at hand. Don't you realize how stupid you look when you do

this?

And that mumbo-jumbo you just stated is related to what? You are a
simpleton when it comes to easily out-debating you and it's humorous
watching you wiggle thru your subject-changing over and over again.
While I can easily see how it bothers you to have to go thru all
this, I quiver with excitement every time I put another notch in my
belt--and most of it has to do with your feeble replies to my facts.

Yup. They are following the FDA regulations just like IGT is
following NV gaming regulations. The difference is one allows
rounding down while the other has specific guidelines for

randomness. Two completely different topics. Any other idiotic
comments?

Yeah---like have you checked with the FDA as I have over the
requirements? Check 'em and you'll see how very similar the wording
is. Or are you feeling good over the usual--throwing out assertions
with the faint hope that you are right?

Pure BS. If it's random then nothing else is required. In fact, the
NGC regulations clearly disallow "secondary decisions" like the one
you just made up. You really should go read reg 14. It's online so
with a little effort you can check it out for yourself.

Anyone can see all you're doing is racing to figure out how to keep
your silly "total/all-the-time randomness without deviation" in tact
in your mind so you won't go bonkers at the casinos or when you're in
bed all night doing what you do best--thinking about it. Once again,
the facts that have been double-checked by me win out over
speculation & hope.
  

Yawn. You forgot to answer the question. What do you think is

inside a calcuator? Everyone else knows ... so take your time (I
already told you) ... it's a CPU. That stands for central processing
unit. You know, those little things you find in personal computers
too. So, what do you have? You have a little computer. That's all a
calculator is, Robbie, so please don't embarrass yourself any further.

I think you could make a good commercial for Southwest
Airlines' "Wanna Get Away?" parody. You stumbled by calling a slide
rules replacement a (chuckle chuckle) COMPUTER! (hahahah!!!) and I
called you on it with CALCULATOR, so now you're trying desperately to
save face (ho-hum....) by saying there's a COMPUTER inside a
CALCULATOR!!! Ooo..ohh...oooohh...!!! Somebody please stop me from
breaking a gut!!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:

> Never has taken a "big game" to get the best of you. All anyone
needs to do is state facts.

You mean, like "getting your license suspended for speeding!!?"
HAHAHA--the game to you is figuring out how many times I get you to
stuff both feet into your mouth at the same time!

In Nevada you get 1-5 demerit points for speeding. 12 points and your
license is suspended. I assume it's about the same everywhere. Now,
as to your latest "projection" ... try to get those feet out of your
mouth.

> Well, the law in MN was 3 speeding tickets in one year gets your
> license suspended. Don't know about other states but I suspect

they

> are similar. However, since you are the king of unsubstantiated
> assertions, why don't you research this one and get back to us.

Gee....too bad you didn't state multiple tickets in the first

place,

Nor did I state a single ticket or the first ticket. You just don't
have a clue.

but you didn't mean to, did you. In other words, you got stuck in
your own falsifications and misrepresentation, I pushed you to your
outer limits with the facts, so you came whimpering back almost
begging me to accept your reconstructed wording. I haven't seen
anyone eat that much humble pie since Tiny Tim.

Scrambling again? If you thought before you typed you might not get
into this position all the time. BTW, excessive speeding can
sometimes lead to suspension with one ticket. It's called wreckless
driving.

OK, now that I've cleared up more of Robbie's confusion, let's get
back to what my prompted my comment in the first place. You claimed
speeding wasn't "ILLEGAL". So, it's obvious now that you are
admitting it is illegal and that it can lead to a suspension. That's
all I was trying to show. Add another one to my win column.

> > Hot cycles are irrelevant to the casinos because players like

you

> who are addicted and who when they win they try to win more

because

> they just can't seem to get enough of a fix of that intermittent
> > satisfaction they crave, will always play right on thru big
winners or a bunch of little ones anyway--resulting in the same or
bigger loss.
>
> Robbie, you really stumbled throught that one. When faced with
facts
> you revert to silly assertions that are totally unrelated to the
> topic at hand. Don't you realize how stupid you look when you do
this?

And that mumbo-jumbo you just stated is related to what? You are a
simpleton when it comes to easily out-debating you and it's

humorous

watching you wiggle thru your subject-changing over and over again.
While I can easily see how it bothers you to have to go thru all
this, I quiver with excitement every time I put another notch in my
belt--and most of it has to do with your feeble replies to my facts.

Yawn, let me know when you throw in a fact.

> Yup. They are following the FDA regulations just like IGT is
> following NV gaming regulations. The difference is one allows
> rounding down while the other has specific guidelines for
randomness. Two completely different topics. Any other idiotic
comments?

Yeah---

I figured as much. At least you're admitting up front that an idiotic
comment is to follow.

like have you checked with the FDA as I have over the
requirements? Check 'em and you'll see how very similar the wording
is. Or are you feeling good over the usual--throwing out assertions
with the faint hope that you are right?

Good job. This one is way up there in the "idiotic" rankings.

Show us a comment from both with "very similar wording". Of course, I
know, and I suspect everyone else knows, you haven't read either one.
Oh, and please make sure to provide the references. LMAO.

Anyone else getting a mega-laugh out of Robbie comparing food
regulations with gambling regulations? I guess he gets confused when
he sees those cherries, oranges and plums on the machines as he
gambles. Robbie, you really don't win them ... they're just symbols.

> Pure BS. If it's random then nothing else is required. In fact,

the

> NGC regulations clearly disallow "secondary decisions" like the

one

> you just made up. You really should go read reg 14. It's online

so

> with a little effort you can check it out for yourself.

Anyone can see all you're doing is racing to figure out how to keep
your silly "total/all-the-time randomness without deviation" in

tact

in your mind so you won't go bonkers at the casinos or when you're

in

bed all night doing what you do best--thinking about it. Once

again,

the facts that have been double-checked by me win out over
speculation & hope.

I've read over the regs many times. Usually, pointing out where they
invalidate your assertions. In fact, I have reg.14 copied to my hard
drive and can reference it whenever I want. Here's the parts of
14.040 that invalidate everything you have said:

2. Must use a random selection process to determine the game outcome
of each play of a game. The random selection process must meet 95
percent confidence limits using a standard chi-squared test for
goodness of fit.
(a) Each possible permutation or combination of game elements which
produce winning or losing game outcomes must be available for random
selection at the initiation of each play.
(b) For gaming devices that are representative of live gambling
games, the mathematical probability of a symbol or other element
appearing in a game outcome must be equal to the mathematical
probability of that symbol or element occurring in the live gambling
game. For other gaming devices, the mathematical probability of a
symbol appearing in a position in any game outcome must be constant.
(c) The selection process must not produce detectable patterns of
game elements or detectable dependency upon any previous game
outcome, the amount wagered, or upon the style or method of play.

3. Must display an accurate representation of the game outcome. After
selection of the game outcome, the gaming device must not make a
variable secondary decision which affects the result shown to the
player.

4. Must display the rules of play and payoff schedule.

5. Must not automatically alter paytables or any function of the
device based on internal computation of the hold percentage.

> Yawn. You forgot to answer the question. What do you think is
inside a calcuator? Everyone else knows ... so take your time (I
already told you) ... it's a CPU. That stands for central

processing

unit. You know, those little things you find in personal computers
too. So, what do you have? You have a little computer. That's all a
calculator is, Robbie, so please don't embarrass yourself any

further.

I think you could make a good commercial for Southwest
Airlines' "Wanna Get Away?" parody. You stumbled by calling a slide
rules replacement a (chuckle chuckle) COMPUTER! (hahahah!!!) and I
called you on it with CALCULATOR, so now you're trying desperately

to

save face (ho-hum....) by saying there's a COMPUTER inside a
CALCULATOR!!! Ooo..ohh...oooohh...!!! Somebody please stop me from
breaking a gut!!!

I guess that demonstrates the difference in our intellect. I know and
understand that a calculator is simply a small computer. You
obviously don't. What more need I say?

PS. To be perfectly accurate you stated "do they make electronic
slide rules". ... Now, really, just how funny is that ...

In Nevada you get 1-5 demerit points for speeding. 12 points and

your license is suspended. I assume it's about the same everywhere.
Now, as to your latest "projection" ... try to get those feet out of
your mouth. > Nor did I state a single ticket or the first ticket.
You just don't have a clue.

I guess you were really bothered by how stupid I made you look trying
to say you can get your license suspended for speeding
(hohohehehehahaha!). But not to worry---you're saving face with
2Wild!! (wink wink!!)
   

Scrambling again? If you thought before you typed you might not get
into this position all the time. BTW, excessive speeding can
sometimes lead to suspension with one ticket. It's called wreckless
driving. > OK, now that I've cleared up more of Robbie's confusion,

let's get

back to what my prompted my comment in the first place. You claimed
speeding wasn't "ILLEGAL". So, it's obvious now that you are
admitting it is illegal and that it can lead to a suspension.

That's

all I was trying to show. Add another one to my win column.

Don'tcha just love it when I make a nerd whine! And this one wheezis
at the drop of a hat!

> > Yup. They are following the FDA regulations just like IGT is
> > following NV gaming regulations. The difference is one allows
> > rounding down while the other has specific guidelines for
> randomness.

Right...like expecting anyone with authority would know how to read a
contract that requires state-mandated min/max hold %'s. When you
awaken from the nightmare I've planted in you, just let us know.

Oh, and please make sure to provide the references. LMAO.

I think I'll let you do your own research. It might actually save you
some time and money with all that addict-play in those dumpy locals
casinos you do!
  

I've read over the regs many times.

So everyone on every forum has heard a million times.... Too bad it
hasn't helped your articulation of the facts.

Usually, pointing out where they invalidate your assertions. In
fact, I have reg.14 copied to my hard drive and can reference it
whenever I want. Here's the parts of 14.040 that invalidate
everything you have said:

Wait a minute!! HAHAHA....did you say it's COPIED to your hard
drive??! HAHAHAHAHA!!! Who does that--and for what purpose? Are you
THAT insecure?? What a HOOT!! Go ahead and read it, print it and
pretend you understand it. I've TALKED to the NGC about "it" and just
as you're terrified of meeting me face to face, you'll never talk to
them face to face. Anyone wanna guess why?

> I think you could make a good commercial for Southwest
> Airlines' "Wanna Get Away?" parody. You stumbled by calling a

slide rules replacement a (chuckle chuckle) COMPUTER! (hahahah!!!)
and I called you on it with CALCULATOR, so now you're trying
desperately to save face (ho-hum....) by saying there's a COMPUTER
inside a CALCULATOR!!! Ooo..ohh...oooohh...!!! Somebody please stop
me from breaking a gut!!!

I guess that demonstrates the difference in our intellect. I know

and understand that a calculator is simply a small computer. You

obviously don't. What more need I say?

Just how fast I caught you on that one and how stupid you really feel
as you so obviously try to cover your tracks.....

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:

> In Nevada you get 1-5 demerit points for speeding. 12 points and
your license is suspended. I assume it's about the same everywhere.
Now, as to your latest "projection" ... try to get those feet out

of

your mouth. > Nor did I state a single ticket or the first ticket.
You just don't have a clue.

I guess you were really bothered by how stupid I made you look

trying

to say you can get your license suspended for speeding
(hohohehehehahaha!). But not to worry---you're saving face with
2Wild!! (wink wink!!)

I guess Robbie has now concluded he has made a sufficient fool of
himself to move on. No place to hide, Robbie. You insisted on
debating whether speeding was illegal ... now you know you were
wrong. (What really makes one wonder is how he ever thought it WASN'T
illegal.)

> Scrambling again? If you thought before you typed you might not

get

> into this position all the time. BTW, excessive speeding can
> sometimes lead to suspension with one ticket. It's called

wreckless

> driving. > OK, now that I've cleared up more of Robbie's

confusion,

let's get
> back to what my prompted my comment in the first place. You

claimed

> speeding wasn't "ILLEGAL". So, it's obvious now that you are
> admitting it is illegal and that it can lead to a suspension.
That's
> all I was trying to show. Add another one to my win column.

Don'tcha just love it when I make a nerd whine! And this one

wheezis

at the drop of a hat!

ROTFLMAO. I think the "win column" reference hit home. Now, back to
the original question (changing the subject didn't work). Why would
IGT do something ILLEGAL with absolutely nothing to gain?

> > > Yup. They are following the FDA regulations just like IGT is
> > > following NV gaming regulations. The difference is one allows
> > > rounding down while the other has specific guidelines for
> > randomness.

Right...like expecting anyone with authority would know how to read

a

contract that requires state-mandated min/max hold %'s. When you
awaken from the nightmare I've planted in you, just let us know.

I guess Robbie's hitting the booze again. Now he's responding to OLD
posts. Too bad there's no contracts involved ... just regulations.

> Oh, and please make sure to provide the references. LMAO.

I think I'll let you do your own research. It might actually save

you

some time and money with all that addict-play in those dumpy locals
casinos you do!

Translation: In addition to his other failures Rob has no clue how to
do the research ... which, of course, means his original post was a
complete fabrication. (Was there ever a doubt?)

> I've read over the regs many times.

So everyone on every forum has heard a million times.... Too bad it
hasn't helped your articulation of the facts.

No, it helps considerably when the facts are right there in front of
you. You should try it someday.

Usually, pointing out where they invalidate your assertions. In
fact, I have reg.14 copied to my hard drive and can reference it
whenever I want. Here's the parts of 14.040 that invalidate
everything you have said:

Wait a minute!! HAHAHA....did you say it's COPIED to your hard
drive??! HAHAHAHAHA!!! Who does that--and for what purpose? Are you
THAT insecure?? What a HOOT!! Go ahead and read it, print it and
pretend you understand it. I've TALKED to the NGC about "it" and

just

as you're terrified of meeting me face to face, you'll never talk

to

them face to face. Anyone wanna guess why?

The education of Robbie, the technology deficient con man, continues.
Once you bring up a webpage you can easily copy the contents to your
local hard drive. This can be useful if you want easy access to
information and can afford a big hard drive (I suspect Robbie has a
really SMALL hard drive). But then, that would require you to have a
minimum of skills (which you obviously lack).

If you think anyone believes you've ever talked to the NGC, think
again.

> > I think you could make a good commercial for Southwest
> > Airlines' "Wanna Get Away?" parody. You stumbled by calling a
slide rules replacement a (chuckle chuckle) COMPUTER! (hahahah!!!)
and I called you on it with CALCULATOR, so now you're trying
desperately to save face (ho-hum....) by saying there's a COMPUTER
inside a CALCULATOR!!! Ooo..ohh...oooohh...!!! Somebody please stop
me from breaking a gut!!!

> I guess that demonstrates the difference in our intellect. I know
and understand that a calculator is simply a small computer. You
> obviously don't. What more need I say?

Just how fast I caught you on that one and how stupid you really

feel

as you so obviously try to cover your tracks.....

Nice try but you are failing miserably and looking so totally
impotent. You even stated that I said "there's a COMPUTER inside a
CALCULATOR" which is incorrect and demonstrates how poorly you
understand technology (as well as how poorly you read). I stated a
scientific calculator IS a computer (big difference). It's your lack
of understanding of these simple facts that always give you away.
Now, I wonder if Rob knows the difference between a scientific
calculator and a standard calculator. HINT: try duplicating the
functions of a slide-rule on a standard calculator.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

I guess Robbie has now concluded he has made a sufficient fool of
himself to move on. No place to hide, Robbie. You insisted on
debating whether speeding was illegal ... now you know you were
wrong. (What really makes one wonder is how he ever thought it

WASN'T illegal.)

Like an arrow thru the heart--you just can't stop showing how
incompetent you are when it comes to admitting your mistakes....and I
LOVE every minute of your whining display!
   

> Don'tcha just love it when I make a nerd whine! And this one
wheezis at the drop of a hat! Lick your wounds (or have one of

them "advantage playing" addicts you like sitting next to for false
confidence-building) handle that task for you. They'll understand.
They really will.

ROTFLMAO. I think the "win column" reference hit home. Now, back to
the original question (changing the subject didn't work). Why would
IGT do something ILLEGAL with absolutely nothing to gain?

Back to the original answer: IGT does nothing "illegal" on their pre-
programmed hot & cold cycles in all vp machines. Like it or lump it.
  

I guess Robbie's hitting the booze again. Now he's responding to

OLD posts. Too bad there's no contracts involved ... just regulations.

Any binding regulatory provisions are contractual by law. But then a
geek wouldn't have access to that kind of information after having
been locked up by engineering managers for years, now would they....
  

The education of Robbie, the technology deficient con man,

continues. Once you bring up a webpage you can easily copy the
contents to your local hard drive. This can be useful if you want
easy access to information and can afford a big hard drive (I suspect
Robbie has a really SMALL hard drive). But then, that would require
you to have a minimum of skills (which you obviously lack).

Zzzoooom! right over your head--or should I say THRU it--again! While
you were wasting time trying to explain what your momma taught you
about computers, everyone else was laughing at you for saving that
kind of nonsense in the first place! Let me help you out here---
HAHAHAHA!!! Does geeky get it yet??!

Nice try but you are failing miserably and looking so totally
impotent. You even stated that I said "there's a COMPUTER inside a
CALCULATOR" which is incorrect and demonstrates how poorly you
understand technology (as well as how poorly you read). I stated a
scientific calculator IS a computer (big difference). It's your

lack

of understanding of these simple facts that always give you away.
Now, I wonder if Rob knows the difference between a scientific
calculator and a standard calculator. HINT: try duplicating the
functions of a slide-rule on a standard calculator.

You know what--I didn't read all your attempt at face-saving words
again because you're doing a lot of that lately. Kinda perturbed a
little, esp. at this issue, aren't we?! Poor baby--he's not in a
casino right now so he's feeling lost and alone....

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

Why am I not suprised that our goofball used to act
like a moron on blackjack boards?

In light of the deranged behavior pattern witnessed
recently, let's look at the characteristics of the
aggresively dishonest screwball variously known as
Argentino/Singer/Barker/BabyBubba etc:

1. Repeatedly kicked out of VP and gambling forums,
which are operated in an attempt to make a profit,
because he's such a total asshole;

2. Has it put in a VP FAQ(item 49)that he's a liar;

3. When a certified public accountant, Charlie
Mayfield, offered to audit his tax returns for free,
to "confirm" his moronic VP assertions,
refused, and said he would charge money to view those
tax returns;

4. Maintains the "pre-programmed hot streak" idiocy,
despite having the Nevada regulation that bars such a
possibility shoved down his throat numerous times;

5. Hasn't had a job in over a decade, sponges off
his wife, yet boasts of his position as "supervising
systems engineer", or some similar gibberish. Reminds
us of the boast he put on Fezzik's board that he was
"worldwide vice president for marketing".
I expect to hear about the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes
soon, with all these categories being equally credible
and laughable;

6. Went bankrupt in California real estate at a time
when nobody could possibly lose money in that area;

7. Maintains a view of american politics that says
that criticizing the mass murdering Bush is "hating
america". The way 70% of the american people do.
Typical chickenshit, chickenhawk fascist drip.
Obviously has no understanding of the american
political ideal;

Of course the thinking of Mustain, 2-Wild, someone-
else and myself would not be complete without
reference to these other participants
in various forums, concerning the psychiatric buffet
table known as 'Singer':

rascal:

"I doubt you hit a $50K winner, Rob. Those are
generally reserved for people who know
what they are doing, and you -- to say the least --
don't exactly have the aura of
competence about you. Also, I finally took the
opportunity to visit your
website -- or is it a shrine? -- and I read through
some of your columns -- or are
they tributes? -- finding contradiction after
contradiction. Doesn't your editor ever
edit you? I publish textbooks and I assure you, it
takes months and months of back
and forth between writer and editor before a
manuscript is accepted, so it looks
like either Gaming Today doesn't give a flip, or they
are pretty darn casual when it
comes to your column. Maybe they feel like they're
getting what they paid for??"

oej719

"You are a con , liar , joke ,fool. I feel sorry for
anyone that
has to live with you. Your children would be
embarrassed, if they knew the truth.
No wonder a poker machine is your life. I bet you
don't even have a pet. I get so
many emails from people here that say you are wacked,
fried, or insane and I agree
because I know you.

You are a racist, a nobody, envious of everyone, and
friendless.
Oh being a nice guy myself I think I left our your
tendency to have a weak wrist if you
get my drift."

shadowman

"Eduardo, very good question. Singer will try to say
it was something I did, but, in fact,
it is just a rather poor attempt to hide from his
previous lies. Yes, he said it was an
IGT person. Yes, it would be against the law for IGT
to program hot-cold streaks in machines.
Yes, Singer created this lie so he would appear to
have inside information. It makes him
appear more credible and gives him a reason why he has
had success inspite of the math.
It's just one lie to cover up another one. This is the
REAL Rob Singer.

The only debate here is Rob's lies vs. the facts. He
will continue to push them as long as
he thinks someone will listen. He will deny whatever
he thinks he can get away with
including the IGT quote. He will bring in a
"supporting cast" when he thinks he is losing.
That is why harpo showed up."

lvhcm1:

I don't have much of an opinion one way or the other
regarding Singer,
not withstanding the fact that I feel he is mentally
ill. If Jon feels
strongly Singer should go, I'm not gonna be the one
standing in his way.
While Singer can sometimes be mildly amusing, he is
the very
definition of an internet troll. Combining all his
aliases, he has
over 10k posts on this forum alone, with the majority
merely hijacks
into political rubbish. And, to top it all off, the
fucker never
learned how to use the goddamn quote function.
So, farewell to "The Master of the Blade".

ramthebuffs:

I've got to agree he's a troll. I am totally anti
censor tho...
I can't really think of any useful threads he's had(or
any of his pseudos).
Generally he takes an opinion that no one would
backup.
People like him are generally self loathing and like
to force
other peoples aggression onto them, whatever it takes.

doubledealdecker:

Good riddance! He is just a total hustler and his
video poker
ideas are total BS. Besides, I don't like him. Don't
go away mad
Sing Sing, just go away. Wonderful news! Thank you,
mods. Hallelujah!! !...
And Sing Sing, Thanks for playing at LVASports, Sir!

arcimedes:

You should know that this is TWO forums in the last 3
months where
Singer has been banned. He is nothing but a con man
looking to
attrack suckers and provides nothing of value. The
only question is
where will he show up next???

drunken horseplayer:

Think singer might have been abused a few too many
times by teachers before;
maybe he was repeatedly caned in the head.

I'm sure that a therapist could be found who would
read, slowly, the above material to Mr.
shit_for_brains.

The guaranteed Singer response: the troller's triumph.
"They noticed me masturbating in public. I'm in their
heads."

···

____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

Aha! The easily irritated Meldrone comes out of hiding---reminds me
of a scared little thing who'll only go after someone when there's a
gang he can get courage from! Only problem is, here you're all
getting spanked by me together! And notice all the effort he went
thru to drag posts and put together lies about them or in ALL of
them. What a FAN!!

By his frustrated demeanor, you can readily identify that he's been
following my NFL picks this season. While most of my e-mails on it
are from LVA Sports posters (who get any positive posts about me on
LVA immediately deleted at Anthony Curtis' direction) I can feel his
burning up over +45 units.

The only other area that merits attention is how Meldrone -- a well-
known America & Bush-hater and extremist liberal fanatic from the
homo-laden/sick Bay Area -- has been pouting, moaning, groaning &
griping uselessly for NEARLY 8 FULL YEARS as the Great GWB continues
his foreign policy-mastery and country-saving agenda. Not only that,
he's got more stomach ache in store as we'll see another Republican
continue on protecting this great country later this year. I can only
imagine his pain...pain in watching those of us who are prepared to
pay higher gasoline prices; those of us who've saved enough money
over the years so we don't have to blame someone else for any
problems; and how he pretends to worry about the spending in the war
against terror yet ignores what the rising record stock market has
meant to those of us with the means to be a part of keeping this a
strong country at ANY time.

Yes, I have to admit I do get massive satisfaction out of seeing such
a wimpy wussy whiner complain and ache over what makes this country
great. Too bad he wasn't REALLY at war. One of his platoon could
shoot him and put him out of his misery!! YEAH!! But that's OK--I
enjoy watching him suffer - even if it's only intermittently shown.

God Bless The Great GWB In His Job As Leader In The World's Fight
Against Terrorism!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, jim thompson <meldrone@...> wrote:

Why am I not suprised that our goofball used to act
like a moron on blackjack boards?

In light of the deranged behavior pattern witnessed
recently, let's look at the characteristics of the
aggresively dishonest screwball variously known as
Argentino/Singer/Barker/BabyBubba etc:

1. Repeatedly kicked out of VP and gambling forums,
which are operated in an attempt to make a profit,
because he's such a total asshole;

2. Has it put in a VP FAQ(item 49)that he's a liar;

3. When a certified public accountant, Charlie
Mayfield, offered to audit his tax returns for free,
to "confirm" his moronic VP assertions,
refused, and said he would charge money to view those
tax returns;

4. Maintains the "pre-programmed hot streak" idiocy,
despite having the Nevada regulation that bars such a
possibility shoved down his throat numerous times;

5. Hasn't had a job in over a decade, sponges off
his wife, yet boasts of his position as "supervising
systems engineer", or some similar gibberish. Reminds
us of the boast he put on Fezzik's board that he was
"worldwide vice president for marketing".
I expect to hear about the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes
soon, with all these categories being equally credible
and laughable;

6. Went bankrupt in California real estate at a time
when nobody could possibly lose money in that area;

7. Maintains a view of american politics that says
that criticizing the mass murdering Bush is "hating
america". The way 70% of the american people do.
Typical chickenshit, chickenhawk fascist drip.
Obviously has no understanding of the american
political ideal;

Of course the thinking of Mustain, 2-Wild, someone-
else and myself would not be complete without
reference to these other participants
in various forums, concerning the psychiatric buffet
table known as 'Singer':

rascal:

"I doubt you hit a $50K winner, Rob. Those are
generally reserved for people who know
what they are doing, and you -- to say the least --
don't exactly have the aura of
competence about you. Also, I finally took the
opportunity to visit your
website -- or is it a shrine? -- and I read through
some of your columns -- or are
they tributes? -- finding contradiction after
contradiction. Doesn't your editor ever
edit you? I publish textbooks and I assure you, it
takes months and months of back
and forth between writer and editor before a
manuscript is accepted, so it looks
like either Gaming Today doesn't give a flip, or they
are pretty darn casual when it
comes to your column. Maybe they feel like they're
getting what they paid for??"

oej719

"You are a con , liar , joke ,fool. I feel sorry for
anyone that
has to live with you. Your children would be
embarrassed, if they knew the truth.
No wonder a poker machine is your life. I bet you
don't even have a pet. I get so
many emails from people here that say you are wacked,
fried, or insane and I agree
because I know you.

You are a racist, a nobody, envious of everyone, and
friendless.
Oh being a nice guy myself I think I left our your
tendency to have a weak wrist if you
get my drift."

shadowman

"Eduardo, very good question. Singer will try to say
it was something I did, but, in fact,
it is just a rather poor attempt to hide from his
previous lies. Yes, he said it was an
IGT person. Yes, it would be against the law for IGT
to program hot-cold streaks in machines.
Yes, Singer created this lie so he would appear to
have inside information. It makes him
appear more credible and gives him a reason why he has
had success inspite of the math.
It's just one lie to cover up another one. This is the
REAL Rob Singer.

The only debate here is Rob's lies vs. the facts. He
will continue to push them as long as
he thinks someone will listen. He will deny whatever
he thinks he can get away with
including the IGT quote. He will bring in a
"supporting cast" when he thinks he is losing.
That is why harpo showed up."

lvhcm1:

I don't have much of an opinion one way or the other
regarding Singer,
not withstanding the fact that I feel he is mentally
ill. If Jon feels
strongly Singer should go, I'm not gonna be the one
standing in his way.
While Singer can sometimes be mildly amusing, he is
the very
definition of an internet troll. Combining all his
aliases, he has
over 10k posts on this forum alone, with the majority
merely hijacks
into political rubbish. And, to top it all off, the
fucker never
learned how to use the goddamn quote function.
So, farewell to "The Master of the Blade".

ramthebuffs:

I've got to agree he's a troll. I am totally anti
censor tho...
I can't really think of any useful threads he's had(or
any of his pseudos).
Generally he takes an opinion that no one would
backup.
People like him are generally self loathing and like
to force
other peoples aggression onto them, whatever it takes.

doubledealdecker:

Good riddance! He is just a total hustler and his
video poker
ideas are total BS. Besides, I don't like him. Don't
go away mad
Sing Sing, just go away. Wonderful news! Thank you,
mods. Hallelujah!! !...
And Sing Sing, Thanks for playing at LVASports, Sir!

arcimedes:

You should know that this is TWO forums in the last 3
months where
Singer has been banned. He is nothing but a con man
looking to
attrack suckers and provides nothing of value. The
only question is
where will he show up next???

drunken horseplayer:

Think singer might have been abused a few too many
times by teachers before;
maybe he was repeatedly caned in the head.

I'm sure that a therapist could be found who would
read, slowly, the above material to Mr.
shit_for_brains.

The guaranteed Singer response: the troller's triumph.
"They noticed me masturbating in public. I'm in their
heads."

______________________________________________________________________
______________

Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ