“I don’t know Dr. Hartley ... I just HATE the holidays”

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:

> > Don'tcha just love it when I make a nerd whine! And this one
> wheezis at the drop of a hat! Lick your wounds (or have one of
them "advantage playing" addicts you like sitting next to for false
confidence-building) handle that task for you. They'll understand.
They really will.

> ROTFLMAO. I think the "win column" reference hit home. Now, back

to

> the original question (changing the subject didn't work). Why

would

> IGT do something ILLEGAL with absolutely nothing to gain?

Back to the original answer: IGT does nothing "illegal" on their

pre-

programmed hot & cold cycles in all vp machines. Like it or lump it.

I doubt it was missed by anyone, but did you notice how Robbie
quickly deleted my posting of reg 14.040 that invalidates "pre-
programmed hot & cold cycles". Robbie, the quote about "no secondary
decisions" wipes out any possibility of this ever happening.

> I guess Robbie's hitting the booze again. Now he's responding to
OLD posts. Too bad there's no contracts involved ... just

regulations.

Any binding regulatory provisions are contractual by law. But then

a

geek wouldn't have access to that kind of information after having
been locked up by engineering managers for years, now would they....

No, they are regulations. Calling them contracts is silly. They may
incorporate some the same ideas but that doesn't change them. Guess
what Robbie, if they contracts then we would call them contracts.

> The education of Robbie, the technology deficient con man,
continues. Once you bring up a webpage you can easily copy the
contents to your local hard drive. This can be useful if you want
easy access to information and can afford a big hard drive (I

suspect

Robbie has a really SMALL hard drive). But then, that would require
you to have a minimum of skills (which you obviously lack).

Zzzoooom! right over your head--or should I say THRU it--again!

While

you were wasting time trying to explain what your momma taught you
about computers, everyone else was laughing at you for saving that
kind of nonsense in the first place! Let me help you out here---
HAHAHAHA!!! Does geeky get it yet??!

I love it all Robbie responds with his idiotic banter. It means my
point hit home. I suspect the "SMALL hard drive" did the most damage.

> Nice try but you are failing miserably and looking so totally
> impotent. You even stated that I said "there's a COMPUTER inside

a

> CALCULATOR" which is incorrect and demonstrates how poorly you
> understand technology (as well as how poorly you read). I stated

a

> scientific calculator IS a computer (big difference). It's your
lack
> of understanding of these simple facts that always give you away.
> Now, I wonder if Rob knows the difference between a scientific
> calculator and a standard calculator. HINT: try duplicating the
> functions of a slide-rule on a standard calculator.

You know what--I didn't read all your attempt at face-saving words
again because you're doing a lot of that lately. Kinda perturbed a
little, esp. at this issue, aren't we?! Poor baby--he's not in a
casino right now so he's feeling lost and alone....

I wonder how much time Robbie spent checking this out before
submitting (yes, that's what you did once again, Robbie)? Chalk up
another one in the win column. Now, I know how the Pats must feel.

[rgmustain]

Why am I not suprised that our goofball used to act
like a moron on blackjack boards?

I wouldn't doubt for a moment that he first attempted a scam at BJ
but failed miserably.

3. When a certified public accountant, Charlie
Mayfield, offered to audit his tax returns for free,
to "confirm" his moronic VP assertions,
refused, and said he would charge money to view those
tax returns;

Tell us more. Rob has always claimed he would bet any amount of money
to PROVE is was a winner. It appears the first time he was given a
chance he backed down. This is hilarious. No question about it, this
PROVES Rob has been lying about his winnings.

5. Hasn't had a job in over a decade, sponges off
his wife, yet boasts of his position as "supervising
systems engineer", or some similar gibberish. Reminds
us of the boast he put on Fezzik's board that he was
"worldwide vice president for marketing".
I expect to hear about the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes
soon, with all these categories being equally credible
and laughable;

I suspect he is the "worldwide vice president for marketing" of Rob
Singer Cons, Inc. Also, the only employee.

After I retired I had to form a corporation to do some consulting
work. As such, I was the President and CEO of the company. I thought
it was amusing. Of course, mine was a REAL corporation that made real
money and paid real taxes. I doubt Rob could say the same.

6. Went bankrupt in California real estate at a time
when nobody could possibly lose money in that area;

I think this pretty much tells us all we need to know about Singer. A
complete loser in every way.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, jim thompson <meldrone@...> wrote:

[jim_thompson]

The offer by Mayfield, and the ludicrous refusal,
occured on the Fezzik board in the second half of
2006, perhaps early 2007. Those archives are cranky to
search, but perhaps during a slack period . . .

http://forums.lasvegasadvisor.com/categories.cfm?catid=36

···

--- rgmustain <rgmustain@att.net> wrote:

> 3. When a certified public accountant, Charlie
> Mayfield, offered to audit his tax returns for
free,
> to "confirm" his moronic VP assertions,
> refused, and said he would charge money to view
those
> tax returns;

Tell us more. Rob has always claimed he would bet
any amount of money
to PROVE is was a winner. It appears the first time
he was given a
chance he backed down. This is hilarious. No
question about it, this
PROVES Rob has been lying about his winnings.

      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

[Rob_Singer2]

Robbie, the quote about "no secondary decisions" wipes out any
possibility of this ever happening.

It's close to painful watching you desperately trying to validate
your own lies about the Regs. If you were a real programmer you'd
realize every "decision" rendered by the code in a vp program is
included in what you as a geek would call a PRIMARY program. I
understand you're short on talent here, but in an effort to further
your programming education you should be aware that corrections are
always included in the same program as all other requirements. The
only reason you keep referring to "secondary" is because it's the
only way you can talk yourself into me not being right.
   

No, they are regulations. Calling them contracts is silly. They may
incorporate some the same ideas but that doesn't change them. Guess
what Robbie, if they contracts then we would call them contracts.

Your inexperience is oozing out from the seams again--even though
you're scrambling to hide it. When more than one party signs a
document legally regulating anything anywhere--and the NGC Regs are
signed by them as well as all casino operators if you ever took the
time to understand how it's done instead of tossing out
unsubstantiated assertions to cover your tracks--that effort
constitutes a Binding Contract. I.E., YOU LOSE AGAIN!
   

> > Now, I wonder if Rob knows the difference between a scientific
> > calculator and a standard calculator. HINT: try duplicating the
> > functions of a slide-rule on a standard calculator.

Oops--Mr. Wizard just stumbled again. A calculator is a calculator
whether it calculates math or physics. Whenever you're losing an
argument you give last ditch efforts to save face by breaking the
issue down into separate elements....only egg ended up on it this
time. Once again, permit me to say "Poor baby"!!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

[Rob_Singer2]

Now let's hear it again....Who's your Daddy Mr. Thompson???!! You're
such a fake and a liberal whiner that I miss you when you disappear
for so long. Telling lies about me is a good way to rile Dick up!

Charlie Mayfield is the ONLY person who's ever had the courage to bet
me on anything. He lost, he came to Scottsdale and he paid up. Oh,
BTW--it was on a football game, you know, the newest game I'm doing
better than just about everybody at!! We discussed his offer to audit
and he came to the conclusion that either no one would believe him,
critics would say I submitted phoney records, and tax records alone
offer no proof without accompanied by all the exact information and
subsequent irrefutable proof on bank accounts, casino contemporaneous
records, and my IRS records along with all my & my wife's other
financial information that I offered up in a $640,000 bet that I put
on escrow and identified where and which Fezzik verified before
running away. Dick of course was humiliated exactly the same in my
column and since he has no money, he never got past go.

Weenies like Meldrone hate to see me drag his heroes thru the mud,
but while I enjoy every minute of it as I do here with Dick, it gives
me added pleasure to watch Melly whimper at the sign or vast
superiority. WELCOME HOME LIBERAL LOSER!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, jim thompson <meldrone@...> wrote:

The offer by Mayfield, and the ludicrous refusal,
occured on the Fezzik board in the second half of
2006, perhaps early 2007. Those archives are cranky to
search, but perhaps during a slack period . . .

http://forums.lasvegasadvisor.com/categories.cfm?catid=36

--- rgmustain <rgmustain@...> wrote:

>
> > 3. When a certified public accountant, Charlie
> > Mayfield, offered to audit his tax returns for
> free,
> > to "confirm" his moronic VP assertions,
> > refused, and said he would charge money to view
> those
> > tax returns;
>
> Tell us more. Rob has always claimed he would bet
> any amount of money
> to PROVE is was a winner. It appears the first time
> he was given a
> chance he backed down. This is hilarious. No
> question about it, this
> PROVES Rob has been lying about his winnings.
>

______________________________________________________________________
______________

Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:

>Robbie, the quote about "no secondary decisions" wipes out any
>possibility of this ever happening.

It's close to painful watching you desperately trying to validate
your own lies about the Regs. If you were a real programmer you'd
realize every "decision" rendered by the code in a vp program is
included in what you as a geek would call a PRIMARY program. I
understand you're short on talent here, but in an effort to further
your programming education you should be aware that corrections are
always included in the same program as all other requirements. The
only reason you keep referring to "secondary" is because it's the
only way you can talk yourself into me not being right.

ROTFLMAO. This reminds me of the old Saturday Night Live with
Roseannadanna going on and on. Well, Robbie, here's the punch
line ... it doesn't say secondary PROGRAMS, it says secondary
DECISIONS. Doesn't matter whether it's the primary program as far as
the regulation is concered. It is referring to decisions made AFTER
the RNG has done it's thing. Now, could you give us a little "never
mind".

Is this hilarious or what?

If this wasn't funny enough. The entire parargraph is pure BS.
Decisions can be made in any program ... primary, secondary,
subprograms ... you name it. Only a complete programming moron
wouldn't understand this fact.

> No, they are regulations. Calling them contracts is silly. They

may

> incorporate some the same ideas but that doesn't change them.

Guess

> what Robbie, if they contracts then we would call them contracts.

Your inexperience is oozing out from the seams again--even though
you're scrambling to hide it. When more than one party signs a
document legally regulating anything anywhere--and the NGC Regs are
signed by them as well as all casino operators if you ever took the
time to understand how it's done instead of tossing out
unsubstantiated assertions to cover your tracks--that effort
constitutes a Binding Contract. I.E., YOU LOSE AGAIN!

Of course, I win again. The documents that are signed are specified
in the regulations. They are NOT the regs themselves. BTW, if you
even took a moment to look at the regs you would already know this
and could have avoided lookiing like a fool.

> > > Now, I wonder if Rob knows the difference between a

scientific

> > > calculator and a standard calculator. HINT: try duplicating

the

> > > functions of a slide-rule on a standard calculator.

Oops--Mr. Wizard just stumbled again. A calculator is a calculator
whether it calculates math or physics. Whenever you're losing an
argument you give last ditch efforts to save face by breaking the
issue down into separate elements....only egg ended up on it this
time. Once again, permit me to say "Poor baby"!!!

Boy, you are intent on being a fool. You just said "calculates math
or physics". What an idiotic statement. Math is the only thing that
is ever "calculated". Physics USES math to describe the world around
us. You really need to stop drinking when you're posting.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

[Rob_Singer2]

ROTFLMAO. This reminds me of the old Saturday Night Live with
Roseannadanna going on and on. Well, Robbie, here's the punch
line ... it doesn't say secondary PROGRAMS, it says secondary
DECISIONS. Doesn't matter whether it's the primary program as far

as

the regulation is concered. It is referring to decisions made AFTER
the RNG has done it's thing. Now, could you give us a little "never
mind".

Is this hilarious or what?

If this wasn't funny enough. The entire parargraph is pure BS.
Decisions can be made in any program ... primary, secondary,
subprograms ... you name it. Only a complete programming moron
wouldn't understand this fact.

You stayed up this late to make up something that would help ease
your pain and embarrassment!? Just like a calculator is a calculator
is a calculator, programs render decisions. You can do all the
scrambling around in the world and it isn't gonna help you out of
your most recent hole. HILARIOUS is the word for how funny--and FUN--
you are!
    

> Your inexperience is oozing out from the seams again--even though
> you're scrambling to hide it. When more than one party signs a
> document legally regulating anything anywhere--and the NGC Regs

are

> signed by them as well as all casino operators if you ever took

the

> time to understand how it's done instead of tossing out
> unsubstantiated assertions to cover your tracks--that effort
> constitutes a Binding Contract. I.E., YOU LOSE AGAIN!

Of course, I win again. The documents that are signed are specified
in the regulations. They are NOT the regs themselves. BTW, if you
even took a moment to look at the regs you would already know this
and could have avoided lookiing like a fool.

Here's where--and why--you look so stupid again. You just said
exactly what I did only you tried to flip the wording around. I've
been at the NGC, I've seen the Regs that are SIGNED by all casino
operators, and they are one and the same documents that you're trying
to weasel-word in your attempt to save face. Only problem is....MORE
EGG!!
   

Boy, you are intent on being a fool. You just said "calculates math
or physics". What an idiotic statement. Math is the only thing that
is ever "calculated". Physics USES math to describe the world

around us. You really need to stop drinking when you're posting.

You just don't know when to stop looking like a moron. but I'm always
glad to help because I'm ALWAYS right! From the Internet: "A
scientific calculator is a type of electronic calculator designed to
calculate problems in science (especially physics), engineering, and
mathematics." I guess according to you--a fading self-proclaimed
programmer, math wizard and scientist--you missed the boat again. And
the funniest thing is you've been stepping in your own poop since
this calculator argement started! This is just too funny--I'm making
you look like a fool in front of your so-called fans and imagine the
humiliation you're ALL feeling right about now!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:

> ROTFLMAO. This reminds me of the old Saturday Night Live with
> Roseannadanna going on and on. Well, Robbie, here's the punch
> line ... it doesn't say secondary PROGRAMS, it says secondary
> DECISIONS. Doesn't matter whether it's the primary program as far
as
> the regulation is concered. It is referring to decisions made

AFTER

> the RNG has done it's thing. Now, could you give us a

little "never

> mind".
>
> Is this hilarious or what?
>
> If this wasn't funny enough. The entire parargraph is pure BS.
> Decisions can be made in any program ... primary, secondary,
> subprograms ... you name it. Only a complete programming moron
> wouldn't understand this fact.

You stayed up this late to make up something that would help ease
your pain and embarrassment!? Just like a calculator is a

calculator

···

is a calculator, programs render decisions. You can do all the
scrambling around in the world and it isn't gonna help you out of
your most recent hole. HILARIOUS is the word for how funny--and FUN-

-

you are!

Note that Robbie has no rebuttal for my facts. All he has is his
childish assertions that continue to make him appear impotent.

> > Your inexperience is oozing out from the seams again--even

though

> > you're scrambling to hide it. When more than one party signs a
> > document legally regulating anything anywhere--and the NGC Regs
are
> > signed by them as well as all casino operators if you ever took
the
> > time to understand how it's done instead of tossing out
> > unsubstantiated assertions to cover your tracks--that effort
> > constitutes a Binding Contract. I.E., YOU LOSE AGAIN!

> Of course, I win again. The documents that are signed are

specified

> in the regulations. They are NOT the regs themselves. BTW, if you
> even took a moment to look at the regs you would already know

this

> and could have avoided lookiing like a fool.

Here's where--and why--you look so stupid again. You just said
exactly what I did only you tried to flip the wording around. I've
been at the NGC, I've seen the Regs that are SIGNED by all casino
operators, and they are one and the same documents that you're

trying

to weasel-word in your attempt to save face. Only problem

is....MORE

EGG!!

1. A person may act as a manufacturer or distributor, or as an
operator, only if that person holds a license specifically permitting
the person to act as a manufacturer or distributor, or as an
operator except as provided for in NRS 463.160(2).
2. Applications for manufacturer's, distributor's, or operator's
licenses shall be made, processed, and determined in the same manner
as applications for nonrestricted gaming licenses, using such forms
as the chairman may require or approve.
(Adopted: 7/89. Amended: 5/00; 5/03.)

Robbie, note the reference to "forms" ... gotcha again. Since Robbie
claims he'd "seen" something that doesn't exist we can only surmise
that he was lying. And, therefore, that he has been lying about
everything. ROTFLMAO.

> Boy, you are intent on being a fool. You just said "calculates

math

> or physics". What an idiotic statement. Math is the only thing

that

> is ever "calculated". Physics USES math to describe the world
around us. You really need to stop drinking when you're posting.

You just don't know when to stop looking like a moron. but I'm

always

glad to help because I'm ALWAYS right! From the Internet: "A
scientific calculator is a type of electronic calculator designed

to

calculate problems in science (especially physics), engineering,

and

mathematics."

Yup, exactly what I said. The problem is decomposed down to a
mathematical representation and then calculated. The math is what is
calculated. The interpretation is something altogether different. In
fact, this is pretty much how math is always used. The number you get
balancing a checkbook has a "meaning". It is not just a number, it is
something called monthly balance. Boy, Robbie, you really are about
the slowest thing I've ever seen.

I guess according to you--a fading self-proclaimed
programmer, math wizard and scientist--you missed the boat again.

And

the funniest thing is you've been stepping in your own poop since
this calculator argement started! This is just too funny--I'm

making

you look like a fool in front of your so-called fans and imagine

the

humiliation you're ALL feeling right about now!!
>

Now you get to eat those words. LMAO and chalking up another WIN.

[Rob_Singer2]

Note that Robbie has no rebuttal for my facts. All he has is his
childish assertions that continue to make him appear impotent.

As you sail off into the distant susnset--embarrassed and humbled--
remember who your daddy is.....
     

1. A person may act as a manufacturer or distributor, or as an
operator, only if that person holds a license specifically

permitting

the person to act as a manufacturer or distributor, or as an
operator except as provided for in NRS 463.160(2).
2. Applications for manufacturer's, distributor's, or operator's
licenses shall be made, processed, and determined in the same

manner

as applications for nonrestricted gaming licenses, using such forms
as the chairman may require or approve.
(Adopted: 7/89. Amended: 5/00; 5/03.)

Robbie, note the reference to "forms" ... gotcha again. Since

Robbie

claims he'd "seen" something that doesn't exist we can only surmise
that he was lying. And, therefore, that he has been lying about
everything. ROTFLMAO.

We already know you'll go to any lengths to make up your assertions
and then try endlessly to spin them---only you always end up with egg
on your face. I can only imagine the level of your humiliation. None
of that worthless, wordy jargon has anything to do with the issue
except in your mind. So WHO'S your daddy??!
   

Yup, exactly what I said. The problem is decomposed down to a
mathematical representation and then calculated. The math is what

is calculated. The interpretation is something altogether different.
In fact, this is pretty much how math is always used. The number you
get balancing a checkbook has a "meaning". It is not just a number,
it is something called monthly balance. Boy, Robbie, you really are
about the slowest thing I've ever seen.

Looks like I hit the birdie right between the eyes again with a
rhetorical response loaded with more nervous, neurotic, meaningless
wordiness! Oh what fun! It's slightly difficult to go thru this even
on this end, but to dismantle a nerd in an area he prides himself on--
albeit made up to the point of no return on the forums--I would find
that unimagineable. But he gets a daddy out of it, so.....

Now you get to eat those words. LMAO and chalking up another WIN.

If anyone but the fat asses who play "advantage video poker" in the
LV local casinos all day long were to chow down a dishful of the
nervous wordiness you serve up, you can bet the hot air wouldn't only
be coming from your mouth.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:

> Note that Robbie has no rebuttal for my facts. All he has is his
> childish assertions that continue to make him appear impotent.

As you sail off into the distant susnset--embarrassed and humbled--
remember who your daddy is.....

Yawn ... do you really believe trite cliches are going to win you any
points? Guess again.

> 1. A person may act as a manufacturer or distributor, or as an
> operator, only if that person holds a license specifically
permitting
> the person to act as a manufacturer or distributor, or as an
> operator except as provided for in NRS 463.160(2).
> 2. Applications for manufacturer's, distributor's, or operator's
> licenses shall be made, processed, and determined in the same
manner
> as applications for nonrestricted gaming licenses, using such

forms

> as the chairman may require or approve.
> (Adopted: 7/89. Amended: 5/00; 5/03.)
>
> Robbie, note the reference to "forms" ... gotcha again. Since
Robbie
> claims he'd "seen" something that doesn't exist we can only

surmise

> that he was lying. And, therefore, that he has been lying about
> everything. ROTFLMAO.

We already know you'll go to any lengths to make up your assertions
and then try endlessly to spin them---only you always end up with

egg

on your face. I can only imagine the level of your humiliation.

None

of that worthless, wordy jargon has anything to do with the issue
except in your mind. So WHO'S your daddy??!

Nice try vet. I see, once again, you have no rebuttal to my factual
post. Believe me when I say .... AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, it feels so
good.

> Yup, exactly what I said. The problem is decomposed down to a
> mathematical representation and then calculated. The math is what
is calculated. The interpretation is something altogether

different.

In fact, this is pretty much how math is always used. The number

you

get balancing a checkbook has a "meaning". It is not just a number,
it is something called monthly balance. Boy, Robbie, you really are
about the slowest thing I've ever seen.

Looks like I hit the birdie right between the eyes again with a
rhetorical response loaded with more nervous, neurotic, meaningless
wordiness! Oh what fun! It's slightly difficult to go thru this

even

on this end, but to dismantle a nerd in an area he prides himself

on--

albeit made up to the point of no return on the forums--I would

find

that unimagineable. But he gets a daddy out of it, so.....

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, it still feels good. Still looking for a single
crumb of intelligence in your posts. Nope, couldn't find any.

Now that I've established Robbie knows nothing about NV gaming
regulations and nothing about computers. What should I point out next?

> Now you get to eat those words. LMAO and chalking up another WIN.

If anyone but the fat asses who play "advantage video poker" in the
LV local casinos all day long were to chow down a dishful of the
nervous wordiness you serve up, you can bet the hot air wouldn't

only

be coming from your mouth.

"Projection" at it's best.

Should we start talking abut your mental illnes now, Robbie? There is
help. Narcisstic Personality Disorder (NPD) can be effectively
treated once you admit to your problem and seek out that help. It may
be a little more difficult than your addiction problem, but it's got
to be better than constantly viewing the world with your hatred and
mistrust. Think about it.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

[Rob_Singer2]

Yawn ... do you really believe trite cliches are going to win you

any points? Guess again.

That's where you stumble and fall over and over again. You're the
only one after points (hmmm....sounds eerily like your pathological
vp addiction) and ways to impress a handful of idiots who combined
along with you, make it easier and easier for me to batter to a pulp.
      

Nice try vet. I see, once again, you have no rebuttal to my factual
post. Believe me when I say .... AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, it feels so
good.

Sound like ya gotch dick in ya hand!
At your age, health level, and accompanied by all your bad gambling
habits----oh! what an interesting and enjoyable life----I wouldn't be
keeping my hand TOO busy any more.
  

> If anyone but the fat asses who play "advantage video poker" in

the

> LV local casinos all day long were to chow down a dishful of the
> nervous wordiness you serve up, you can bet the hot air wouldn't
only be coming from your mouth.
>

"Projection" at it's best.

You mean "Projection that hits the spot and hurts!"

Should we start talking abut your mental illnes now, Robbie? There

is help. Narcisstic Personality Disorder (NPD) can be effectively

treated once you admit to your problem and seek out that help. It

may be a little more difficult than your addiction problem, but it's
got to be better than constantly viewing the world with your hatred
and mistrust. Think about it.

OK. I thought about it. You're still an Internet fraud pretending to
relive your disappointing life today as a forum know-it-all, and
constantly being exposed by the incomparablly intelligent and
talented Rob singer as an addicted, lying, losing, programming
charlatan who leads a tell-all life in his declining years by falling
into the gambling trap set by casino managers everywhere. You might
want to read misscraps recent post--it's pretty tragic and paints
your life to a tee.

Another whitewash. How ya gonna live with yourself now!!?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:

> Yawn ... do you really believe trite cliches are going to win you
any points? Guess again.

That's where you stumble and fall over and over again. You're the
only one after points (hmmm....sounds eerily like your pathological
vp addiction) and ways to impress a handful of idiots who combined
along with you, make it easier and easier for me to batter to a

pulp.

I guess we can expect continued trite cliches from Robbie. Also, it
appears he thinks only those that have posted the truth about him
read this forum. Now that he's called everyone else an "idiot" I
suppose it doesn't matter.

> Nice try vet. I see, once again, you have no rebuttal to my

factual

> post. Believe me when I say .... AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, it feels

so

> good.

Sound like ya gotch dick in ya hand!
At your age, health level, and accompanied by all your bad gambling
habits----oh! what an interesting and enjoyable life----I wouldn't

be

keeping my hand TOO busy any more.

This is some "projection" I could do without.

> > If anyone but the fat asses who play "advantage video poker" in
the
> > LV local casinos all day long were to chow down a dishful of

the

> > nervous wordiness you serve up, you can bet the hot air

wouldn't

> only be coming from your mouth.
> >
>
> "Projection" at it's best.

You mean "Projection that hits the spot and hurts!"

Probably. But, tell us more, where does it hurt?

> Should we start talking abut your mental illnes now, Robbie?

There

is help. Narcisstic Personality Disorder (NPD) can be effectively
> treated once you admit to your problem and seek out that help. It
may be a little more difficult than your addiction problem, but

it's

got to be better than constantly viewing the world with your hatred
and mistrust. Think about it.

OK. I thought about it. You're still an Internet fraud pretending

to

relive your disappointing life today as a forum know-it-all, and
constantly being exposed by the incomparablly intelligent and
talented Rob singer as an addicted, lying, losing, programming
charlatan who leads a tell-all life in his declining years by

falling

into the gambling trap set by casino managers everywhere. You might
want to read misscraps recent post--it's pretty tragic and paints
your life to a tee.

Another whitewash. How ya gonna live with yourself now!!?

Pretty easy. Can't you see how this pent up hatred inside you is
impacting your life? There is help out there. With it, you will no
longer have to attack others to feel good about yourself. Giving up
your alcohol addiction will be easier when you can look in a mirror
without being repulsed. Think about it.

[Rob_Singer2]

I guess we can expect continued trite cliches from Robbie. Also, it
appears he thinks only those that have posted the truth about him
read this forum. Now that he's called everyone else an "idiot" I
suppose it doesn't matter.

If you can read between the lines like "everyone else" you'd
understand that the only proven idiot is you....
       

> OK. I thought about it. You're still an Internet fraud pretending
to
> relive your disappointing life today as a forum know-it-all, and
> constantly being exposed by the incomparablly intelligent and
> talented Rob singer as an addicted, lying, losing, programming
> charlatan who leads a tell-all life in his declining years by
falling
> into the gambling trap set by casino managers everywhere. You

might

> want to read misscraps recent post--it's pretty tragic and paints
> your life to a tee.
>
> Another whitewash. How ya gonna live with yourself now!!?

Pretty easy. Can't you see how this pent up hatred inside you is
impacting your life? There is help out there. With it, you will no
longer have to attack others to feel good about yourself. Giving up
your alcohol addiction will be easier when you can look in a mirror
without being repulsed. Think about it.

While you were wallowing in your sorrow & pain, you forgot to add in
about the added bonus I get from pulling your pants down in front of
all those you try to impress across the forums all the time! It is
you who mocks them with all your make believe knowledge on every
subject as you try to "belong" to something in your declining years
at a time when you're lost and lonely--having only LV and the
degenerate locals casinos as your friends. Think about it.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "robsinger1111"
<robsinger1111@...> wrote:

> I guess we can expect continued trite cliches from Robbie. Also,

it

> appears he thinks only those that have posted the truth about him
> read this forum. Now that he's called everyone else an "idiot" I
> suppose it doesn't matter.

If you can read between the lines like "everyone else" you'd
understand that the only proven idiot is you....

http://www.narcissistic-personality-disorder.net/treatment.html

> > OK. I thought about it. You're still an Internet fraud

pretending

> to
> > relive your disappointing life today as a forum know-it-all,

and

> > constantly being exposed by the incomparablly intelligent and
> > talented Rob singer as an addicted, lying, losing, programming
> > charlatan who leads a tell-all life in his declining years by
> falling
> > into the gambling trap set by casino managers everywhere. You
might
> > want to read misscraps recent post--it's pretty tragic and

paints

> > your life to a tee.
> >
> > Another whitewash. How ya gonna live with yourself now!!?

> Pretty easy. Can't you see how this pent up hatred inside you is
> impacting your life? There is help out there. With it, you will

no

> longer have to attack others to feel good about yourself. Giving

up

> your alcohol addiction will be easier when you can look in a

mirror

> without being repulsed. Think about it.

While you were wallowing in your sorrow & pain, you forgot to add

in

about the added bonus I get from pulling your pants down in front

of

all those you try to impress across the forums all the time! It is
you who mocks them with all your make believe knowledge on every
subject as you try to "belong" to something in your declining years
at a time when you're lost and lonely--having only LV and the
degenerate locals casinos as your friends. Think about it.

http://mi.essortment.com/narcissisticper_rwga.htm