--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > > were in my column. Your address shows up more than a
dozen
> > times
> > > in
> > > > > the past 8 weeks. Liar.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, but it wasn't me. The only time I was there was back
in
> > > > January. Maybe your webmaster is playing with your mind ...
> > >
> > > More than likely, you're playing with your own. It's your
only
> way
> > > out of this....in your mind.
> >
> > Then again, this is probably just another lie. You know, just
like
> > the one where you claimed to have seen a picture of me but
can't
> back
> > up the claim.
>
> That's your story--the only one that can let you sleep at night.
Liar.If this were the truth you would have the webmaster post the dates
and my email address. The lack of this easily obtainable evidence
is
absolute proof you are lying once again.
Why would I do that when I'm having such a good time watching you
squeal and squirm at every mention of it?
> > > The mere fact that you've already read it--probably several
times-
> -
> >
> > Sorry to disappoint you ... again. I STILL have never read GT.
But,
> I
> > now suspect there never was an article. Otherwise you would
have
> > posted it here like you've done many times.
>
> Re-read it on my site. anytime. I won't block your access.I have no desire to read your lies. I can tell by the fact that you
failed to copy it here (like you have several others), that there
is
really nothing of merit to read. I think everyone can tell by the
way
you're almost begging me to go to your website that you are
downtrodden by the lack of response to your lies.
Ha! The first lie is "But gee Rob, I haven't read it" then "I
haven't gone to your site in ages" then "I have no desire to read
it"....and all this after proposing a bet!! Looks like more of them
fatal darts are zinging at you and you can't get out of the way. And
you're right--I AM downtrodden. Always happens when there's a barrage
of messages to a new article that I have fun with, then when it
passes it's a bit of a downer. That's especially true when I'm
slapping around a nerd in public and all of a sudden it stops!
> > > > > You know wrong. I don't listen to babble when I'm
playing,
> and
> > > when
> > > > > I'm done I don't hang around for chit-chat.
> > > >
> > > > On one hand you tell us about all your buddies at the
casinos
> > where
> > > > you can get information.
> > >
> > > That's EMPLOYEES, Mr. Wizard. And they don't hang around the
> > > degenerate machines like self-proclaimed "AP's" do.
> >
> > If you don't "hang around", then you don't talk with employees
> > either.
>
> You're thinking of the low-lifes who work the floors and chit-
chat
> with the degenerates who gamble day in and day out. I'm talking
> employees who who don't stick around and guzzle beer with all the
> hard-working boys that trample to the bars in the joints you
> frequent.Sure you are.
>
> Next time you DO "hang around" ASK them about the people that
> > think the payoffs are controlled externally. I'm sure they hear
it
> > all the time.
>
> I will. But why it's important I'll never know.To keep educating you.
I can see it now : "Greg, tell me about the people that think the
payoffs are controlled externally". "Rob, I think I've heard my
mother talking to her grandmother about it on the phone, but not in
here".
> >
> > > > > > "When are they going to loosen 'em up?"
> > > > > > "Boy are these machines tight"
> > > > > > "You think they could let us win once in while"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The fact that you express doubt about this shows you
lack
> any
> > > > > > understanding of a typical casino environment. No
wonder
> > > everyone
> > > > > > laughs when you state you are some kind of guru.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not doubt. I don't care about it.
> > > >
> > > > That's fine, but I don't think your fantasy of becoming a
guru
> > will
> > > > ever come true with this approach.
> > >
> > > I am, and have been for 7 years now, the guru that you
detest.
> Why?
> >
> > Because you are a liar and a fraud.
>
> That's not in the dreams you have though, is it.No, you've never appeared in any of my dreams. Just the fact you
fantasize about someone thinking or dreaming about you is
extrememly
telling. People with self confidence don't care what other people
think.
I can hear it now in the middle of the night "Rob, oh Rob, please
help me understand the error of my ways!" And at least twice a
week. "I'm sorry, it's my own fault for having this nerdy streak that
won't let me open up to you, but I will in time....in time."
> >
> > >
> > > Maybe you should ask your GT buddy
> > > > Elliot to help you understand what REALLY goes on inside a
> > casino.
> > > > He's much more knowledgeable than you are.
> > >
> > > You mean the mercy-hire?? HAHAHA! He's the only 'writer'
alive
> that
> > > still scratches his old man's butt and comes up with math BS
> > instead
> > > of the true fact that Lenny never won and believed no one
could
> win.
> >
> > But he's sooooo much more knowledgeable than you are. He makes
you
> > look like the scum at the bottem of the sewer. He comes across
as
> > extremely intelligent while you appear to have cat litter for
> brains.
>
> Now I see you have yet another geek-hero....Yes, he is a hero. He educates and truthfully provides usable
information to those who read his column. Sooooooo much better than
any of your columns you've posted here.
I can see why he'd be a hero to you. He's wishy-washy, he puts more
numbers in his columns than words, and he's a geek. That'll never
change. Plus he accepts payment where I do not--obviously because he
needs the money since he's just another mouthpiece who cannot win.
But here's an inside scoop: His mercy-hiring is in jeopardy. He's
seen as an exact copy of when Dancer & Hughes wrote before they were
fired just before me (over 5 YEARS AGO), and there's not much
tolerance for such a boring writer. His info is and always has been
useless on top of that. I'm in the middle of a column now that'll
prove why.
> BTW--we're still waiting for you to admit
> you're an addict without all the sugar-coated nonsense that you
> caveat it with. That's one of the reasons you evacuated from the
> other thread.I am about as far away from an addict as you can get.
Denial creates justification.....
Too bad you
picked me to try and presuade others that all APers are addicts. By
the way, if you go back and read the website I pointed out, you
will
see that most addicts have multiple addictions. They have what is
called addictive traits which may very well be genetic in origin.
Do
I need to keep educating you all the time and making you look
extremely foolish.
Just so you don't have a cow, I just went to that home page. What I
see is a definition of exactly how you gamble right there in the pre-
amble! You have an extreme compulsion to gamble more and more, as
proven by your moving to LV. I submit you'll be going thru withdrawal
both on your way back to Minn. as well as when you're there. Won't be
so easy hopping over to your local Injun joint each and every day
from your location. And here's a flash: Those "addictive traits" that
you are so selective with for obvious justification purposes are
something that, while in the actual treatment process, you learn that
gambling is the one addiction that is widely known as not being
grouped into the genetic addiction category. It stands alone because
it is so much more powerful, hideable, deniable, and destructive to
others around the inflicted than any other addiction.
PS. I don't smoke, do drugs and I have a beer about once every
couple
of months. I'm not an exercise junkie, I'm not a workaholic, I hate
shopping, etc. etc. I gambled once a year for 25 years and walked
away each time without feeling any desire to return until the next
year. In fact, I was usually bored with it before I left Las Vegas.
You picked the wrong person, moron.
What I see is someone trying to justify the addiction--something
entirely normal for a compulsive gambler. One of your tell-tale signs
is in how you have painted a proud picture of hopping out to casinos
on an almost daily basis--sometimes more than once--and love to brag
about (or make up?) wild stories of all those royals, yet you never
once include that activity into your attempts at justifying why you
are NOT a problem gambler. That's denial at its greatest. But you'll
diss it and it's normal to do so until you come to the realization
that you're wasting your life away gambling so much.
> >
> > > This is just another
> > > > of your idiotic attempts to put down APers, just like your
> > idiotic
> > > > addiction claims where I proved you have no knowledge
> whatsoever.
> > >
> > > You need a session at one of those luncheons for a slap of
> reality.
> > > Take a look at all your fellow "AP's"! Not a pretty site.
> >
> > I play next to other APers on a regular basis. Except for being
> > extremely intelligent they are not unlike any other cross-
section
> of
> > people.
>
> (snicker snicker). Most of your 'APs' are fat, ugly, and stupid--
and
> hardly intelligent.Please provide evidence that supports this assertion. Do you have
all
their IQs?
Yeah. Look at the luncheon pictures for the first proof. I've been to
a luncheon and the only normal one there was the admin. I regularly
walk by the 25c FPDW machines at Sam's Town, Stations, and Wynn when
in town, and even though I taunt the fools with "Thes must be those A-
D-V-A-N-T-A-G-E Players!" still not one of them has challenged me,
argued, or could pull themselves away for more than an angry glance
or two, while saying under their breath "Singer's an a-hole!" These
people are so stupid that they can't even react to ridicule even
while caught in the act of complusive gambling--as dumb as playing
those type of machines may be!
> If they were they wouldn't be so gullible as you
> are about expert play and long-term strategy. And they are almost
> exclusively introverts--afraid to communicate with the real world
> except from behind the safety of their computers.Hmmmm. You've gone on and on about being an introvert like it's
some
kind of disease. Do you have any idea what you are talking about?
Do
I need to educate you some more? Do you really want to appear
foolish
once again? By the way, from what I hear your hero GWB is an
introvert while your hated Clinton is an extrovert.
Yeah, seems like a good time for you to go find out what an
introvert, i.e., you, really is. I haven't heard that about the great
GWB (except for the border and port issues), but I knew about Clinton
> > > "Medical scam" implies nothing about taking money from
> unsuspecting
> > > people like your heroes do every day. You call me a scammer
all
> the
> > > time, yet I don't take anyone's money for assistance. HELLO!!
> > Anyone
> > > home in there, McFLY??
> >
> > For starters you wrote a book that contains lies and misleading
> > information. That is a scam. It takes money from unsuspecting
folks
> > (albeit only a few since it has gotten such bad reviews).
>
> My 1st book simply tells of the fallacies of playing long-term
> strategy, and of the bilking 'gurus' out there who need
everyone's
> money to feed their own habits.
Like I said. Lies.
They didn't think so, and I continue to pound away with the truth
about their scams.
> None of it is a lie. If it were I'd
> have been in court long ago. I was careful to tell only truths so
> your hero friends wouldn't find a way into my pockets, and they
know
> it. Time for you to go figure it out if you ever plan on
replacing
> one of them in the future--which is your goal and you dream it.
My
> book remains the single most telling, truthful and popular book
ever
> on video poker.HAHAHAHA. Nice try, monkey boy. I think the review I read pretty
much
summed it by saying it was a waste of time.
Of course. Paymar, Hughes, Dancer....These are the people I attacked
and exposed. A few of their nobody groupies like you also wrote
something to make themselves feel better. But it's all meaningless as
more and more people keep getting the book because it signifies the
truth about all these greedy people. And that's what the reading
public wants to hear for a refreshing change--the Undeniable Truth!
> > > > > > > I actually saw 2--one older one from IBM in
Rochester,
> the
> > > > other
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > more recent gem from a security shot at the Edgewater.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sure you did. Please give the dates of the photos ...
just
> in
> > > > case
> > > > > > you're making this up.
> > > > > >
> > > > > Again, I said I saw the photos. You care about dates--for
> what.
> > > You
> > > > > worried your 'hair' wasn't in place on that particular
day?
> > > >
> > > > Caught in another lie? Of course, this is way tooooooooo
easy.
> I
> > > told
> > > > you I worked at IBM and I told you I went to Edgewater. You
> > decided
> > > > to use that knowledge to manufacture another lie. Only, you
got
> > > > caught with your pants down ... again.
> > >
> > > Yup, you told me where you spent your geek career and I know
> people
> > > at the place today. You told me you 'gambled' at Edgewater so
I
> > asked
> > > a close friend there--for a small fee--to research something
and
> > I'd
> > > come in for a look. You're right--it was tooooooo easy. Now
what
> > > about the dates--worried that your 'hair' was out of place??
> >
> > Sure, monkey boy. Let's see the proof. LMAO. Keep up the
babbling,
> it
> > makes you look soooooooooooooooooo foolish.
>
> What about "I saw and don't have" don't you get yet. You seem to
have
> fixated on a fear that I do have pictures and haven't shaken the
webs
> surrounding that terror just yet.Without dates you have NOTHING but lies. Boy this is easy.
I don't keep a geek diary. I wasn't told what date the IBM pic was
from, but I saw it at the Boulder facility. Same with the Edge, only
I saw that in Jan. You see, if you'd have gotten out of that geek-
room where those silly patents were more important than life itself,
you'd have made the contacts that make life easier & fun later on.
I told you last summer I was 6' tall and 210 lbs (remember, average
for an NFL running back.). I told you in January I had a BMI
between
25-30 and how it has been shown that people in this range live
longer
than those below 25. You stated that I was lying. What do you say
now?
I couldn't tell how tall you were in either, but the weight seems
close--chunky more than fat. The BMI's only important to you and your
Doctor. I weigh 205 and I'm 6'2", so from your height you seem a bit
on the stubby side.
> > > > Send me a copy and we can proceed. That's all it takes on
your
> > part.
> > >
> > > It's 3 clicks away on my site. You've already found it, and I
> > > wouldn't be surprised if you brought the paper home 2 weeks
ago.
> Of
> > > course, that would require you go into a decent property to
get
> > one,
> > > and we all know that's not your style. Take the wife to the
dumps
> > and
> > > get away as cheaply as possible.
> >
> > I'm beginning to think there is no article.
>
> I guess you missed the '3 clicks away' part. I'd be kind of
> embarrassed too if I had to read it here.Like I said above, if you had anything you would have posted it
here.
You are such a loser.
>
> So far, Absolutely no one
> > has mentioned any article to me. I guess that pretty much
defines
> Rob
> > Singers' influence in the VP community whether the article
exists
> or
> > not.
>
> You know the routine: Fat, ugly, and dumb vp players who like to
> say "I play with an edge" are totally introverted. There's lots
of
> laughter about you in the homes and hotels around your slum town,
and
> i get lots of messages from the people who read here and have
read
it
> in the paper. They all know who 'dicky the denyer' is. And now
you're
> famous--just what you've wanted all along so you can keep up with
the
> gurus!!Of course, little man. That's why you haven't copied it here. Your
babbling is even more evidence that you came up with zilch. You
knew
that if you printed the truth you would look foolish. Is this great
or what!
No need to copy it here when there computer nerds all over the place
that can read it every day if they wish. Like you've done. You really
want to rip into it with your typical cover-your-butt lies and
rationalizations, I can tell, but you just don't want to be humbled
by copying it here yourself. Oh, how watching nerds agonize over me
creates such joy.....!
> >
> > > > I suppose you've heard this one either. You know, it's grey
and
> > if
> > > > you dig in just a little bit your find plenty of sh*t.
> > > >
> > > You seem rattled--and over this? Re-read your attempt at
saying
> > > something and then try again.
> >
> > If your going to get hung up on spelling errors then I guess
you've
> > now reached the bottem of the barrel. So far I've ignored the
> > hundreds of these errors in your posts. I have more than enough
to
> > deal with the content of your posts.
>
> Huh? The only spelling error I belittle you on is the cat 'liter'
> thing. You're seemingly rattled because your last post got the
best
> of you and you didn't even see it. Now see why you're your own
worst
> enemy here?Rattled by a spelling error? Is that the best you've got? If I got
rattled for making spelling errors I'd be rattled all the time. I'm
a
terrible typist and the keyboard on my notebook doesn't help a bit.
You really are digging deep, little man.
So you're trying to absorb spelling errors in the faint hope that we
will be impressed by your supposed lack of 'more important errors'
huh? Here's more of the truth: You're innacurate, you don't
articulate well, and you get your feathers ruffled easier than
Dan "the twitch" Paymar. Buy yourself a real computer with all those
royals and points. I've got 2 computers paid for by one weeks worth
of winnings. If someone who plays 'negative games' can do it, why
then a 'positive game' player should have a dozen!
> > > > > > I suppose you're going to tell us she's fat too. Come
on,
> > let's
> > > > > hear
> > > > > > the dates. I'll accept your assertion if you can
provide
> the
> > > > dates.
> > > > > > If I don't see any dates then all anyone can assume is
that
> > you
> > > > are
> > > > > > lying.
> > > > > >
> > > > > No, but she's ugly. I couldn't see the rest of her
because
as
> > > > usual,
> > > > > you were in the way.
> > > >
> > > > The lies just keep coming. I'll add this one to the long
list.
> > >
> > > Why of COURSE they're lies, little dicky! How could you live
with
> > > this is they weren't???
> >
> > You couldn't see her because she was blocked off. But, you
state
> > she's ugly. Chuckle, chuckle. Your lies are getting soooooooo
> > obvious. Give us a better description ... height, hair color,
etc.
> > etc. ... What? ... You can't do it? What a surprise. Your lies
are
> > getting easier and easier to uncover.
>
> I was trying to be as kind as possibleOf course you were. wink, wink.
> --I didn't see her body, but I
> can imagine she's no Marilyn Monroe if you know what I mean. But
> here's something that'll get your acid churning again: In a B&W,
she
> looks like a blue-hair!ROTFLMAO. You are such an idiot. Any dates yet? Didn't think so.
Anything at all to support this lie? Didn't think so. Give it up,
moron, you can't slip stupid assertions like this by me. Every time
I
challenge you to provide JUST ONE fact to back up these obvious
lies,
you FAIL miserably. That should tell you something.
I think I'll let you stew some more over this. Isn't it nice watching
a grown nerd cry!
> > Once again, everything is forgeable. I can tell you right now I
> will
> > never bet on on something like this. I should have known you'd
come
> > up with something like this. Nobody with any sense would accept
> this
> > kind of bet. As I said before, you have a 100% record of
scrambling.
>
> Hmmm.... Please explain how I could 'forge' several large
passports
> with country stamps from all over the world, multiple official
fold-
> out Visa's, and my verifiable passport number that a simple call
can
> verify.If you don't think these can be forged you really are naive. I will
admit it would take much more than a $100 printer to perfectly
forge
a passport. However, it would take educated eyes to detect even a
poor forgery. Do you believe a radio host has this ability?
On the contrary, I KNOW passports can be forged and I've seen them,
but it is not easy, it is illegal, and it would be a poor waste of
time and way too much money to attempt to have several large
passports forged, with original stamps and Visas, for a bet. Use your
head.
> >
> > In fact, let me make it easy for you to look really foolish. I
> > believe you have both an EE and a MBA and that you've travelled
> > around the world. Do you really think I believed all the "Who's
> Fred
> > Flintstone" BS? I knew all along this was just another one of
your
> > lies. Of course, I played along because it made you look
foolish.
> > However, it didn't fool me for a second. I also know you
understand
> > perfectly well that a progression can't change a negative
> expectation
> > into a positive one. I've dealt with other trolls before and
have
> > seen these stupid tricks time and again.
>
> You are one smart dude!Thank you.
> >
> > Now, can we get on with the tennis/bowling bet?
>
> Let me REALLY scare you....YES. But, since you've chosen to
wiggle
> out of the proof gig, we'll play tennis for $40k AFTER my foot
heals.
> Bowling for $20k.What did I say before? Robbie ALWAYS changes the bet. The master
scrambler is at it again. You are starting to make the term "fool"
a
compliment to your intelligence. You would have looked smarter by
simply backing out of the bet, rather than PROVING to everyone you
would do EXACTLY what I said you'd do.
I think you over-reacted again, and became so overcome that you
didn't get it. Take it one calm step at a time. You have a problem
with $40k for tennis? State why. My reason is to make up for the $20k
you'd have readily lost in the radio booth (or afterwards, as I
provid absolute proof). You also believe you won't lose playing
tennis, so why the hesitation and/or attempt at evoking one of your
escape routes?? Isn't more money logically in your favor?
> Truth is I rarely bowl because the alleys around
> here are almost as bad as the ones in LV--nothing but power-
drinking
> big mouths that I'm not interested in being around any more. The
> teams are just as bad, only they're comprised mainly of loser
blue-
> collar workers looking for companionship because they don't know
how
> to treat their spouses. And you bowl?ROTFLMAO again. I'll give you two months to get your act together.
You can practice all you want. Both tennis and bowling. Then we can
get together in May (or whenever your foot heals if you think
that's
worse then having a ruptured ACL like I have) and we'll go at it
for
$20K each (as I challenged) or not at all.
I'll play when the Dr. tells me I can play. A ruptured ACL can be
repaired if you wanted it to be and if it were bad enough. But you
still need to come up with a reason why you won't play tennis for
$40k when it seemingly is totally in your favor to do so!
···
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote: