vpFREE2 Forums

Dancer strikes again!

Among other locastions, are not the theoretical and expected ER available right on the screen of the machines when in set up mode?

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Gilbert" <gilbert_616@...> wrote:

To me (in my opinion), this is not as bad as that TV program "How To Beat The Casinos?" (you were in that video too) where Bob Dancer showed this 'picking the right vp machines' to the public and maybe putting a lot of smiles to the casino management as it made things easier for them to spot which machines to downgrade.

Advanced warning for the naive - Dancer posting here will clear nothing up.

A few years ago I posted the following:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/message/50812

Dancer denied what I stated in my post.

I stand by the post. None of it was invented or exaggerated.

Dancer posted in the ensuing thread, and denied what I stated in my post.

If Dancer enters this thread, based on my experience any denials he makes will be meaningless.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "A" <sonnyforple@...> wrote:

Well, why doesn't Bob just post here and clear things up.

Harrahs changed their policy three years ago to one player, one card. However, it almost never gets enforced.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Jean Scott" <queenofcomps@...> wrote:

<<Bob wrote about assuming his wife's identity when hitting the Jumbo
Jackpot. Jean also bragged about her identity fraud and organized crime
ring. Four players assumed one identity to qualify and win Caesar's $500,000
slot tourney. Why aren't these sleazeballs in jail? >>

Slight correction here - we signed up as authorized partners - this was a
"legal" option on the tournament registration card. Brad was the "primary"
player in the tournament, however - this was spelled out in the rules - he
paid the $10000 entry fee - and that is why he collected the whole
$500,000 - the rules stated that only the "primary" registrant would be
paid. The "deal" we had with the other couple was a private one - like
many do in poker tournaments - and we gave them 1/2. I don't think that is
"illegal."

I hope not - I'm too old to go to jail!!!!

As far as spouses playing on each other's card - this has always been a gray
area. It is usually not a problem in most casinos, but one must be careful
in promotions and tournament situations.

I might have to side with Bob on that one. Bob hit for $100K very early in the promo, and had his card pulled next day.

Like a few other places, the HR isn't what is appears to be. They may look like a boutique casino catering to the Hollywood crowd, but they don't take the action as well as they used to. Also like a few other places, their leverage position is probably not an ideal one.

Their host staff has become increasingly confrontational towards higher end VP players, and frankly, run off a few I'd be happy to deal to. They've also done some fairly weaselly stuff with the mailers over the past several months, one of their marketing guys arbitrarily changed the mail from $150-$300/week to $5/week on some of the players. I heard there was a ton of screaming over that one.

Personally, I don't have that much of a problem with Jean, Bob is much more dangerous. It's just that Jean's "I'm just a recreational player little old lady act" is i) annoying, and ii) not done really as well as she thinks she does it. In our line of work, the true professionals go out of their way to check their egos at valet. Jean will never figure that one out, apparently.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, James Thompson <jamesgthompson@...> wrote:

I don't think Jean has ever outed anybody. Dancer is the one I have a big problem with. I know the Hard Rock got fed up with him over an AMEX card promo. He carried his complaint all the way to the casino ops vp. After the conversation they backed him off.

James Thompson'
HRH Monitor

To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
From: worksforthemoney@...
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:49:45 -0800
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Dancer strikes again!

      Jean "outs" people too?

--- On Wed, 11/11/09, tony c <tonyclifton1964@...> wrote:
                 
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Geez, why get so personal? Unless you've seen Jean doing something blatantly wrong, stop picking on her. If you're just making comments based on speculation, rumors or just plain pessimism, stop contributing your negativity. It's not constructive or helpful.

I think Jean is a wonderful lady who has helped so many of us. Despite being a pro, she continues to participate in these forums without being paid, giving sage advice and contributing to the overall gameplay of all of us. I don't see Dancer doing the same. Don't lump them both into the same boat. Jean and Bob may both be pros, but they clearly have different motives.

Jean, I think you are simply wonderful and my life is richer for having your input and advice. Please don't take these naysayers to heart. There are many of us out here that so appreciate you.

April K

···

Personally, I don't have that much of a problem with Jean, Bob is much more dangerous. It's just that Jean's "I'm just a recreational player little old lady act" is i) annoying, and ii) not done really as well as she thinks she does it. In our line of work, the true professionals go out of their way to check their egos at valet. Jean will never figure that one out, apparently.

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, James Thompson <jamesgthompson@>

If you go to paladingaming.net you will see that it is nothing but a forum for a small mind that thinks any other pro VP player is stealing his thunder and ruining his world. Yes, he is full of negativity and is contributing nothing of worth to this forum.

Does this place have an ignore button?

···

--- On Fri, 11/13/09, hermajestyapril <daveprilsvegasvacation@gmail.com> wrote:

From: hermajestyapril <daveprilsvegasvacation@gmail.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Dancer strikes again!
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 13, 2009, 10:39 AM

Geez, why get so personal? Unless you've seen Jean doing something blatantly wrong, stop picking on her. If you're just making comments based on speculation, rumors or just plain pessimism, stop contributing your negativity. It's not constructive or helpful.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

A number is available. It may or may not be a good number.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deuceswild1000" <deuceswild1000@...> wrote:

Among other locastions, are not the theoretical and expected ER available right on the screen of the machines when in set up mode?

April's comment ("Geez, why get so personal?") cracks me up! :slight_smile:

Her comments about Jean Scott are no less 'personal' than the
comments she is complaining about. The only difference is that
April's opinion of Jean differs from that of paladingamingllc's.

Apparently, it's okay to 'get personal' only if it is not negative. LOL!

Curtis

P.S. Jean, I happen to think you are wonderful, too. However,
I also feel that everyone should be allowed to express their
opinions (regardless whether I agree with them or not).

···

On 11/13/09, hermajestyapril <daveprilsvegasvacation@gmail.com> wrote:

Geez, why get so personal? Unless you've seen Jean doing something
blatantly wrong, stop picking on her. If you're just making comments based
on speculation, rumors or just plain pessimism, stop contributing your
negativity. It's not constructive or helpful.

I think Jean is a wonderful lady who has helped so many of us. Despite
being a pro, she continues to participate in these forums without being
paid, giving sage advice and contributing to the overall gameplay of all of
us. I don't see Dancer doing the same. Don't lump them both into the same
boat. Jean and Bob may both be pros, but they clearly have different
motives.

Jean, I think you are simply wonderful and my life is richer for having
your input and advice. Please don't take these naysayers to heart. There
are many of us out here that so appreciate you.

April K

> Personally, I don't have that much of a problem with Jean, Bob is much
more dangerous. It's just that Jean's "I'm just a recreational player little
old lady act" is i) annoying, and ii) not done really as well as she thinks
she does it. In our line of work, the true professionals go out of their way
to check their egos at valet. Jean will never figure that one out,
apparently.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

FWIW,

Recently a person at Total Rewards in Harrahs Laughlin told
us up to 4 persons can play on the same card.

while a couple of us were standing in front of her, he was
given extra cards for this purpose. That person knew we were
going to help him do "Diamond in a Day" (because we asked he
if this was okay). A few hours later we came back and he got
his new Diamond Card. But then, maybe this just a sample of a "boothling being a boothling".

I am not saying this is their current policy, but this is how
this experience recently went down. I guess I would ask each
time what is the current rule! Maybe the ploicy changes for
different promotions or purposes.

Bob

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "WP SF" <paladingamingllc@...>
wrote:

Harrahs changed their policy three years ago to one player,

one card. However, it almost never gets enforced.

···

Like paladingaming or not, this person is one of the few posters left here that makes for some very interesting commentary in the Video poker world today. I appreciate that Jean still posts here, seems Bob is too afraid with all the Dancer backlash.

Does this place have a subscribe to user (paladingaming) button?

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, NC Wanderer <larbo929@...> wrote:

If you go to paladingaming.net you will see that it is nothing but a forum for a small mind that thinks any other pro VP player is stealing his thunder and ruining his world. Yes, he is full of negativity and is contributing nothing of worth to this forum.

Does this place have an ignore button?

--- On Fri, 11/13/09, hermajestyapril <daveprilsvegasvacation@...> wrote:

From: hermajestyapril <daveprilsvegasvacation@...>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Dancer strikes again!
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 13, 2009, 10:39 AM

Geez, why get so personal? Unless you've seen Jean doing something blatantly wrong, stop picking on her. If you're just making comments based on speculation, rumors or just plain pessimism, stop contributing your negativity. It's not constructive or helpful.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

All you have to do is visit his website and join!

···

--- On Fri, 11/13/09, A <sonnyforple@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: A <sonnyforple@yahoo.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Dancer strikes again!
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 13, 2009, 12:09 PM

Does this place have a subscribe to user (paladingaming) button?

.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Good morning Curtis,
Please allow me to clarify... my comments about Jean were founded in facts, which I stated. They had to do with her actions, not her personal behavior. She doesn't have to participate in forums like this and I can't imagine that nasty comments about her are going to encourage her to do so, which is a detriment to all of us. The comments I addressed were personal attacks. I guess when I see someone I care for getting ridiculed publicly for no good reason, my instinct is to defend. Sure, we all have the right to say anything we want anytime, but self-control is a healthy thing to practice. Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

My secondary comments were directed to Jean and the impact she has had on myself and my gaming.

I just think there is no reason to be unneccessarily mean with comments aimed to hurt someone. It does nobody any good. This is a good and generous group of people for the most part. I welcome your comments Curtis and thank you for helping me to explain.

Cut to "All We Need Is Love" and fade to black. :slight_smile:

April

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Curtis Rich <LGTVegas@...> wrote:

April's comment ("Geez, why get so personal?") cracks me up! :slight_smile:

Her comments about Jean Scott are no less 'personal' than the
comments she is complaining about. The only difference is that
April's opinion of Jean differs from that of paladingamingllc's.

Apparently, it's okay to 'get personal' only if it is not negative. LOL!

Curtis

P.S. Jean, I happen to think you are wonderful, too. However,
I also feel that everyone should be allowed to express their
opinions (regardless whether I agree with them or not).

On 11/13/09, hermajestyapril <daveprilsvegasvacation@...> wrote:
>
> Geez, why get so personal? Unless you've seen Jean doing something
> blatantly wrong, stop picking on her. If you're just making comments based
> on speculation, rumors or just plain pessimism, stop contributing your
> negativity. It's not constructive or helpful.
>
> I think Jean is a wonderful lady who has helped so many of us. Despite
> being a pro, she continues to participate in these forums without being
> paid, giving sage advice and contributing to the overall gameplay of all of
> us. I don't see Dancer doing the same. Don't lump them both into the same
> boat. Jean and Bob may both be pros, but they clearly have different
> motives.
>
> Jean, I think you are simply wonderful and my life is richer for having
> your input and advice. Please don't take these naysayers to heart. There
> are many of us out here that so appreciate you.
>
> April K
>
> > Personally, I don't have that much of a problem with Jean, Bob is much
> more dangerous. It's just that Jean's "I'm just a recreational player little
> old lady act" is i) annoying, and ii) not done really as well as she thinks
> she does it. In our line of work, the true professionals go out of their way
> to check their egos at valet. Jean will never figure that one out,
> apparently.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I don't know about the "small dot on the VP landscape", but I can verify that casino GM's are VERY aware of the theoretical ER of their VP offerings from the personal experience of dealing with them. Frankly I would expect nothing less. If I was in their position and didn't understand the business at that level I'm sure I would not last very long.

I think the problem is that they understand the theoretical ER very well, but they don't always understand how VP plays positively or negatively impact the overall return of their casino operation, and often don't understand the profitability of specific VP offerings.

rob

···

--- On Fri, 11/13/09, Jean Scott <queenofcomps@cox.net> wrote:

From: Jean Scott <queenofcomps@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Dancer strikes again!
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 13, 2009, 1:37 AM

<<Sorry Jean. I wish I could go 100% all along with your message but, the

Sorry, Gilbert, but generally casino executives are more knowledgeable about
VP these days than they used to be. There is tons of information available
to them, including from the machine manufacturers. I wish I were that
"powerful," but I am just a small dot on the VP landscape really.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Expanding just a bit on my comments about casinos not really understanding the profitability implications of their offerings, Bob Dancer (and many others) are absolutely right about one thing: a great number of people are adept enough with the internet to understand what represents a good or bad play, but very, very few are willing to put in the time to understand how to really leverage that information.

A case in point (but not by any means a solitary example). Recently one of my local casinos dropped full pay PKM (99.95%) and replaced it with a 96% version. After discussions with several regulars the first weekend after the change , two facts were fundamentally apparent:
1) People understood that full pay PKM was better than the other VP offerings and they also understood the new pay table was different from the full pay pay table
2) Nobody understood that the changes to the pay table that they readily recognized took the game from about a break even proposition with the casino (over the long run with CB) to about a $30 per hour loss ($1.25 play)

In short, they kept playing them like nothing had changed. The most obvious example to take from this is that casinos should get replace all of their attractive pay tables with more advantageous pay tables. But that's not the end of the story.

For the next few weeks, play at those machines dropped off consistently. Every week. When they had the full pay table PKM, you could not get on a machine in prime time. And the rest of the vp was getting the overflow and well loaded up. Now the whole VP are is deserted, even on Friday and Saturday night. And that's not the whole of it. PKM is a very easy game to master. A good player has lots of free time between hands to look around. What I saw when I looking around, what I saw was the people were not playing very accurately--even though this game is relatively easy to play accurately. I would guess there were 5-6 people playing the game at something approaching the true ER. But there were dozens and dozens of people who played the game regularly.

The casino was making money on full pay PKM, no doubt about that. There were too many people playing and playing sub-optimally. And they were making more money from all of the really bad return VP the rest of the machines offered because of all of the spill over action, and general interest. Now they have a $30/hr PKM play (for them), but I would be willing to bet their overall profitability has dropped SIGNIFICANTLY. It has to be so. The place is a ghost town. I don't care how lucrative your pay tables are, if no one plays them, you can't make money.

That a simple example of what I'm talking about.

rob

···

--- On Fri, 11/13/09, Rob Reid <rreid0859@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Rob Reid <rreid0859@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Dancer strikes again!
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 13, 2009, 11:16 PM

I don't know about the "small dot on the VP landscape", but I can verify that casino GM's are VERY aware of the theoretical ER of their VP offerings from the personal experience of dealing with them. Frankly I would expect nothing less. If I was in their position and didn't understand the business at that level I'm sure I would not last very long.

I think the problem is that they understand the theoretical ER very well, but they don't always understand how VP plays positively or negatively impact the overall return of their casino operation, and often don't understand the profitability of specific VP offerings.

rob

--- On Fri, 11/13/09, Jean Scott <queenofcomps@cox.net> wrote:

From: Jean Scott <queenofcomps@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Dancer strikes again!
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 13, 2009, 1:37 AM

<<Sorry Jean. I wish I could go 100% all along with your message but, the

Sorry, Gilbert, but generally casino executives are more knowledgeable about
VP these days than they used to be. There is tons of information available
to them, including from the machine manufacturers. I wish I were that
"powerful," but I am just a small dot on the VP landscape really.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

The same thing happened at the Rampart. They had a bank of 100% machines ( 8 ) right outside the bathrooms. Which I agreed with due to the fact who wants to play with that smell especially after I loaded some logs in it after the buffet. Then after 2 months they took them away. I am their everyday and no one is playing them. I emailed the slot director for the Cannery properties and have had no response. It's been a month now. I did get a response from a host saying that the 100% machines weren't "doing to well" so they had to make changes. The casinos are running themselves like GM. Creating a product no one wants and then looking for handouts.

Rob Reid wrote:

Expanding just a bit on my comments about casinos not really understanding the profitability implications of their offerings, Bob Dancer (and many others) are absolutely right about one thing: a great number of people are adept enough with the internet to understand what represents a good or bad play, but very, very few are willing to put in the time to understand how to really leverage that information.

A case in point (but not by any means a solitary example). Recently one of my local casinos dropped full pay PKM (99.95%) and replaced it with a 96% version.

Mike, from your comment below... I take it you are a lumberjack by trade and you take your work with you into the casinos??? I thought I noticed a woodsy pine scent in the Rampart bathroom.

···

--- On Fri, 11/13/09, Mike Hunt <vpisnotfree@yahoo.com> wrote:

The same thing happened at the Rampart. They had a bank of 100% machines ( 8 ) right outside the bathrooms. Which I agreed with due to the fact who wants to play with that smell especially after I loaded some logs in it after the buffet.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

By "got fed up with him" do you mean "tried to cheat him and he wouldn't let
them"?

Cogno

···

-----Original Message-----
From: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vpF…@…com] On Behalf
Of James Thompson
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 4:42 PM
To: vpfree@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [vpFREE] Re: Dancer strikes again!

I don't think Jean has ever outed anybody. Dancer is the one I have a
big problem with. I know the Hard Rock got fed up with him over an
AMEX card promo. He carried his complaint all the way to the casino
ops vp. After the conversation they backed him off.

James Thompson'
HRH Monitor

To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
From: worksforthemoney@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:49:45 -0800
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Dancer strikes again!

      Jean "outs" people too?

--- On Wed, 11/11/09, tony c <tonyclifton1964@yahoo.com> wrote:

_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Links

how can anyone say it usually is not a problem to play with your spouses cards in most casinos. My understanding is that you only play with your own card!!!!!

···

--- On Thu, 11/12/09, Jean Scott <queenofcomps@cox.net> wrote:

From: Jean Scott <queenofcomps@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Dancer strikes again!
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, November 12, 2009, 6:15 PM

<<Bob wrote about assuming his wife's identity when hitting the Jumbo
Jackpot. Jean also bragged about her identity fraud and organized crime
ring. Four players assumed one identity to qualify and win Caesar's $500,000
slot tourney. Why aren't these sleazeballs in jail? >>

Slight correction here - we signed up as authorized partners - this was a
"legal" option on the tournament registration card. Brad was the "primary"
player in the tournament, however - this was spelled out in the rules - he
paid the $10000 entry fee - and that is why he collected the whole
$500,000 - the rules stated that only the "primary" registrant would be
paid. The "deal" we had with the other couple was a private one - like
many do in poker tournaments - and we gave them 1/2. I don't think that is
"illegal."

I hope not - I'm too old to go to jail!!!!

As far as spouses playing on each other's card - this has always been a gray
area. It is usually not a problem in most casinos, but one must be careful
in promotions and tournament situations.
____________ ____
Jean $¢ott, Frugal Gambler
http://queenofcomps .com/
You can read my blog at
http://jscott. lvablog.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Definitely not true. I have an independent host for a number of properties, and a casino-assigned host at another. Both have told me that to get the best deals, offers, and not hurt your rating, you should as a couple both play on one main card, and use the spouses card for playing when you are going to play for a short time on a given day so as to not kill your daily average.

Of course, you can't be an idiot about it. If you should be lucky enough to hit a W-2g while playing someone else's card, just take out that card before the attendant comes over. When (or if, depending on the casino) they ask for the card, just hand them your own. The system will record the actual winner for annual win-loss records, but you're providing your drivers license, etc. for the W-2g. Tax-wise, unless you're filing separately, there shouldn't be an issue.

···

________________________________
From: "Albert J. Roth, Jr." <alrothjr@yahoo.com>
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, November 14, 2009 12:21:09 PM
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Dancer strikes again!

how can anyone say it usually is not a problem to play with your spouses cards in most casinos. My understanding is that you only play with your own card!!!!!

--- On Thu, 11/12/09, Jean Scott <queenofcomps@ cox.net> wrote:

From: Jean Scott <queenofcomps@ cox.net>
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Dancer strikes again!
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups. com
Date: Thursday, November 12, 2009, 6:15 PM

<<Bob wrote about assuming his wife's identity when hitting the Jumbo
Jackpot. Jean also bragged about her identity fraud and organized crime
ring. Four players assumed one identity to qualify and win Caesar's $500,000
slot tourney. Why aren't these sleazeballs in jail? >>

Slight correction here - we signed up as authorized partners - this was a
"legal" option on the tournament registration card. Brad was the "primary"
player in the tournament, however - this was spelled out in the rules - he
paid the $10000 entry fee - and that is why he collected the whole
$500,000 - the rules stated that only the "primary" registrant would be
paid. The "deal" we had with the other couple was a private one - like
many do in poker tournaments - and we gave them 1/2. I don't think that is
"illegal."

I hope not - I'm too old to go to jail!!!!

As far as spouses playing on each other's card - this has always been a gray
area. It is usually not a problem in most casinos, but one must be careful
in promotions and tournament situations.
____________ ____
Jean $¢ott, Frugal Gambler
http://queenofcomps .com/
You can read my blog at
http://jscott. lvablog.com/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Are you really so ill informed to think that the casino doesn't know the paybacks of every one of its machines down to the millionth of a percent?
Do you think the abscence of multi-play 100% games is mere coincidence?

···

===================================================================

Sorry Jean. I wish I could go 100% all along with your message but, the last paragraph you have does not match what I just replayed/reviewed from the Jean Scott Video included in the Frugal Video Poker game --- where you were showing the 9-6 vs 10-6 Double Double Bonus games at the Palms.

Maybe that part could have been taken out of the CD!? :<
I wonder how many casino executives/managers have seen it and got educated in knowing which one is below or over 100% return.

To me (in my opinion), this is not as bad as that TV program "How To Beat The Casinos?" (you were in that video too) where Bob Dancer showed this 'picking the right vp machines' to the public and maybe putting a lot of smiles to the casino management as it made things easier for them to spot which machines to downgrade.

Unfortunately for many of us 'non-pro'/'non-advantage' players, these very talented casino executives do most of these downgrades in the lower denominations (1-cent to 25-cent) and leave many $5 and higher machines alone waiting for the pros/best players to kill them one more time....so they can have another meeting and choose another 5-cent or 25-cent machine to downgrade. (just check out Harrahs Rincon's vp inventory, for example, if you'd to see downgrades)

So is there anything that can be done to hopefully see the casinos start upgrading the vp machines?
How about publishing more articles/books which explains how bad the existing 8-5 BP or 9-6 DDB machines are to play for 90% plus players due to not being able to do that "Perfect Play"? Why downgrade these machines to 6-5 BP or 8-5 DDB?

How about a guess appearance of a Bob Dancer or Jean Scott at the Oprah's show to explaing to the public (or casinos) that having these 2nd best vp machines (like 9-6 DDB) is not going to hurt the casinos since the Return is only 98.98% WITH PERFECT PLAY? In short, discussions about "how many players are capable of doing the Perfect Play and how many cannot" may help stop the downgrades.

Gil