Excellent point. This is sometimes the case, though if you've only played at
a casino once or twice, it's likely they will chalk a winning trip up to
"luck," and not penalize you at first. However, if you keep showing
better-than-average results, your comps and offers may suffer, or be stopped entirely.
Also, this usually applies only if you play decent EV VP. Win or lose, you
should continue receiving good comps and offers if you play 7/5 JOB, or if you
play slots, even if you win!
None of this is written in stone. You can win at one place and have them
continue sending you great offers. You can even lose, and have them cut you off!
Hard to figure sometimes!
That's one really nice thing about playing at places like the Palms, and
Stations. If you play a lot, especially on multipoint days, you can simply pay
for anything you need with your points. Host discretion and Marketing offers
(not counting the monthly mailers) become less important.
Brian
ยทยทยท
====================================
In a message dated 12/9/2007 8:41:10 PM Pacific Standard Time,
npf15251@yahoo.com writes:
There has been ample discussion about coin-in, trip averages,
theoretical and so forth.
But casinos can and will send entirely different offers to players
with nearly identical play at the same game based on who won and who
did not.
And, in general, the losing player will get better comps. So, in
comparing situations and evaluating posts you must factor in the net
trip win/loss. Without that information, you are comparing "apples and
orages" even if your actions perfectly match another.
Hosts used to say they only wanted your "play", win or lose. That
concept only faintly resembles now how casinos value your action.
Simply put, casinos will offer more and want you back more if you lose.
**************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest
products.
(http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]