vpFREE2 Forums

Why Rob Singer should be banned from EVERY vp group -- because he's no gentleman!

If you sit too close to fire you will get some soot & maybe a burn.
Since you don't play primarily to win, most of the questions you ask
really have no value to you & are not worth worrying about a minor
burn like this to ask them.

    From: Bill Velek
    To: vp_heaven@y... ; vpFREE@y... ; winpoker@y... ;

frugalvp@y... ; Tunica_Travelers@y...

    Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:13 PM
    Subject: [vpFREE] Why Rob Singer should be banned from EVERY vp

group -- because he's no gentleman!

    For those who think that this is off-topic, I apologize; just

had to get

    this off my chest. I'm cross-posting this message to a few of

my other

    regular groups because I'd like folks, including newbies, to

see a prime

    example of why Rob Singer has been banned on at least one VP

group, and

    why we'd all be better off without him on ANY of these groups.

    Awhile back I added Rob Singer to my e-mail filter which

automatically

    deletes all messages coming from him; I did this not because I

dislike

    Rob, but because I was uninterested in most of what he writes.

I must

    confess that I have made a _few_ comments, from time to time,

about his

    flawed 'system', but I can't honestly remember saying anything

bad about

    him, as a person, except perhaps that he doesn't seem to

understand or

    believe mathematics -- something I find difficult to believe of

someone

    who is supposed to be an engineer (at least that's what I've

heard).

    Now I find this unwarranted, extremely distorted, and

shamefully ugly

    post about me on VP_Heaven, which I will now try to straighten

out.

    Then I am going to cancel my membership in that group so that I

will

    never need to read such drivel from him again, and I hope and

implore

    the moderators of my other favorite groups to PLEASE never let

this guy

    join our group.

    Rob's post was prompted by this innocent comment I had put on

VP_Heaven,

    which made absolutely no reference whatsoever to Rob Singer or

his 'system':

    >>Why? Everyone who plays VP plays just a single session in

life; it

    >>starts with the first game of their life, and it ends with

the last

    >>game of their life. Pauses in your play during that single

session

    >>are mere intermissions -- whether they are 5 minutes to run

to the

    >>bathroom, an hour to get something to eat, 6 to 8 hours to

get some

    >>sleep, a week until the next weekend excursion, or a year

until the

    >>next trip to Vegas. The machines have no idea how long

you're gone.

    >>
    >>My goal is always to have a good time with the money I've

brought.

    >>If I'm ahead, I don't stop playing -- I play for as long as I

had

    >>originally planned. If I'm behind, I keep on playing for as

long as

    >>I had originally planned -- so long as I still have the money

I've

    >>budgeted. Naturally, if I run out, I'm sensible enough to

quit

    >>without wiring home for the mortgage money. :-/

    And for THAT, Rob Singer - Professional Gambler :-), with whom

I haven't

    communicated in months, saw fit to try to tear me apart by

posting this

    shameful reply (my comments are interspersed between his):

    >In a message dated 10/23/2002 7:41:09 AM Eastern Daylight

Time,

    >rsinger1111@c... writes:
    >
    >Marsha: Remember, this guy posted that he goes to casinos to

play one

    >nickel at a time ...

    Actually, I usually play one _quarter_ at a time because the

odds are

    better than the nickel machines; however, I'm not too proud to

admit

    that I have _often_ played nickels, and if I could find JOB 9/6

on a

    nickel machine, especially at a bar, then I'd play it rather

than

    quarters -- and yes, I'd probably play one nickel at a time.

It's my

    money, my time, and my own business. If I have fun doing that,

why

    would Rob or anyone else care a hoot?

    >... and sit at the bars to get as loaded as possible before he

crashes

    I won't deny that I like to drink, but I never said that I sit

there and

    get loaded. And I never said that I _ever_ drive after I've

been

    drinking; the fact is that I get a pretty good buzz, but my

wife does

    all the driving -- and she _might_ have one, or at the most,

two alcohol

    beverages all day long. But just like Rob always grossly

exaggerates

    just about every thing that comes out of his mouth, so he's

done it now

    with this defamatory statement about me.

    >... and loses his allotted $80 per trip to somewhere in the

South where

    >he plays.

    That would be in 'Tunica', Rob. Well, I don't need to be a big

spender

    like Rob to have a good time. I guess I'm just a cheapskate;

is that a

    crime? As long as I _tip_ well, which I _always_do_, I don't

see why

    the amount that I budget is anyone's concern. Maybe I can

afford to

    lose more ... and maybe I can't. That's my business.

    >... Supposedly, his wife supports this ironic behavior of a

man who

    >purports to be a DWI attorney. ...

    Irony?! What? That I drink but _DON'T_ drive, ... and yet I'm

a DWI

    attorney? _ALMOST_ irony, Rob, but you didn't quite make it,

as usual.

      And I never said what my wife supports, approves,

disapproves, or how

    she feels about anything. She doesn't like me to smoke, and I

smoke.

    I'm sure she doesn't like me eating as much as I do, since I'm
    overweight. And she probably doesn't care that I drink as much

as I do,

    since she drinks hardly anything. So, ... is she supposed to

divorce

    me? ... or never come to the casinos with me? ... or nag me

while I'm

    gambling?

    >... And I believe he is. It's easy for him to say
    >that we play just one loooong session. He doesn't really know

whether he's

    >coming or going, ...

    Yet _another_ personal attack, without any factual basis

whatsoever.

    >... and it shows in the foolish and incomprehensible posts he

makes.

    I'm surprised you bother trying to read them, Rob, if you find

them so

    foolish and incomprehensible. At least I was smart enough to

start

    filtering you when I felt that way about your posts; the only

reason I

    saw this was that someone else repeated it. And I can well

understand

    how my posts would be incomprehensible to you; maybe my posts

are the

    problem ... do you think? I'd be much more concerned if the

many people

    I respect and admire on these groups shared your sentiments,

but somehow

    I doubt that this is true -- judging from the numerous

conversations

    I've had with those folks.

    >He's continually soft as a grape in what he writes, ...

    Soft? Because I'm generally pretty damned polite? ...

apologetic when I

    make a mistake? ... and gentlemanly? It's called "good

manners", Rob.

    >using no thought
    >or understanding other than that which supposedly tells him

why he cannot

    >win. ...

    Well, I'm not the brightest nor the most gifted, and I've made

my share

    of mistakes -- which I've openly admitted here from time to

time. But

    at least I'm trying to learn and understand, rather than close-

mindedly

    insisting that I'm right and the all the other professional

gamblers and

    mathematicians are wrong. And I try my best to share what I've

learned

    with newbies, rather than to mislead them; yes, Rob, if your

system

    'really' worked, you are nonetheless misleading newbies by not

fully

    explaining all of your secret 'special plays'.

    >... He's an amateur loser, ...

    As opposed to a _professional_ loser?

    >... and all he does is seek attention ...

    You've posted constant rants, rambling and drivel, and have

participated

    in _EXTENSIVE_ flame wars and quarrels -- constantly and

repeatedly

    wasting Internet resources and the time of most members -- all

in the

    defense of your _inflated_ego_, and now you have the audacity

to say

    that all I do is seek attention.

    >... on these boards with posts of wonder laced with corn.

    ?? Whatever! The rest of Rob's nonsensical juvenile tirade is

snipped.

    *****

    Anyway, if anyone other than Rob has actually taken the time to

read to

    the end of this post, let me express my appreciation to all

those of you

    on VP_Heaven who have offered a warm welcome and useful

advice. I hope

    to continue exchanges with you fine folks on the various other

groups

    where I post, such as WinPoker, VP_Free, Frugal Video Poker,

and Tunica

    Travelers, but VP_Heaven has now lost all appeal to me; my

final act

    regarding VPHeaven will be to visit the Yahoogroups website and
    terminate my membership.

    Bill Velek

          Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
                ADVERTISEMENT
               
    vpFREE Home Page:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE

    vpFREE Links:
    http://www.lvcm.com/tomesims/VP/Links.html

    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of

Service.

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
  vpFREE Home Page:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE

  vpFREE Links:
  http://www.lvcm.com/tomesims/VP/Links.html

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of

Service.

···

    ----- Original Message -----

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]