vpFREE2 Forums

Why MCR

#1

In a message dated 8/10/2006 11:13:26 AM Pacific Standard Time,
nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com writes:

How do you define "adequately bankrolled"? Less that 0.1% ror? The
Kelly bankroll? ...?

···

--------------------------------------------------

My personal number is .25% ROR. One chance in 400.

==========================

Ever have a coupon for a double royal? MCR strategy produces the best
return for that coupon.

--------------------------------------------------

Maybe for single line games. It's been a couple of years since I
participated in that kind of promo. The numbers were complicated by the fact that the
best play was quarter 50-play, and you only got credit for ONE single Royal per
hand, and then ONE doubled Royal per hand.

Brian

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#2

In my opinion, for what it's worth, I would say that a 10% ROR is
"adequately bankrolled." Note: "bankroll" is not ones total net worth,
it is the amount of money that could be sacrificed to gambling or the
stop-loss limit amount. If a player doesn't have a stop-loss limit,
this information might be of use:
http://www.gamblersanonymous.org/qna.html

···

How do you define "adequately bankrolled"? Less that 0.1% ror? The
Kelly bankroll? ...?

My personal number is .25% ROR. One chance in 400.

#3

I assume you're speaking for yourself, not others.

I, myself, don't think 10% ROR is right for me.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

···

On 8/12/06, nightoftheiguana2000 <nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com> wrote:

In my opinion, for what it's worth, I would say that a 10% ROR is
"adequately bankrolled."