vpFREE2 Forums

Why Do the Casinos Allow Bob Dancer to teach

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > But if you read his book
> > you'd see he played a ton there, got a ton of free gifts, and
also got caught manipulating the comp system. He is a master at
creating perceptions in vulnerable/needy advantage players.
>
> Yes, some of his methods were less than ethical by most

standards,

> however, to my knowledge he was not arrested or jailed.

And I agree. He was and is an intelligent player who squeezes
everything he can out of his gambling--sometimes with reckless

regard.

>
> >
> > >Also, they do not gamble with the their pen names. But I do
> > > agree they are recognizeable because they tend to play high
> limits.
> > > However, if you read my latest post you will see that they
often
> > >make their money through promotions which actually hurts other
> > >players more than it does the casinos.
> >
> > You mean like the Advantage Player who won the car at

Terrible's

> > worth $21k and lost $28k piling up the drawing tickets? You

mean

> like the famous guru who won the car at the Palms worth $24k but
lost $38k piling up the drawing tickets?
>
> More unverfied assertions.

What do you expect me to do--identify the source, the gamblers'
names, and what I was shown??

Unless you do you might as well spit into the wind. No one will
believe you.

However, it is not unusual for an APer to
> lose more money than a play is worth. On the other hand, it is

not

> unusual for an APer to break even or win money and then win the
> promotion. Our $2000 promotion win last year occurred as we lost
$174 gambling, accumulated $998 in CB/BB and additional comps that

I

> rarely add in. Make sure to add this one to your list.

The 'more than break even' story is the exception not the rule,

Lie. I suppose my $3488 winning in promotions in 2003 was just
another exception? How about $1764 in 2004 and $2835 in 2005? More
exceptions? All this while still WINNING on the gambling side. You
see promotions are just the icing on the cake. Your lies are so easy
to refute it's amazing that you would post them.

and
the losses are far greater overall for sucker AP's who get roped

into

these things. If AP's really won more often than not, you'd see

them

being barred and that does not happen regardless of the made up
stories a few people post on vpFREE.

Lie. What else would we expect from a con man.

>
> Does anyone noticed that Rob always tells only the negative part

of

> the story. He conveniently omits the rest. That should tell you
> something. IT'S A CON.

That's because there IS no positive side to addiction.

No, it's because you'll lie at any time to further your con.

> > It's so easy making others who have an
> > inherent need to believe that advantage play works, to buy into
> > certain scenarios of prowess when nothing has to be proven.
That's why I do checks on claims, and why I'm more than happy to
serve up the truth whenever it's helpful to my readers.

> Half-truths is what you excel in. It's what con men do well.

What else could you possibly say being that you're one of the sheep?

Another half truth. To be more correct you would have to say "one of
the profitable sheep". There's no problem being a sheep that follows
a mathematical proven method of gambling yielding the highest profit
potential.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > It's simple theory vs. reality again, and you lose that one

every

> > time.
>
> Not according to my bank account. It appears the reality of AP

does

> work, while the CON of negative progressions is a disaster

waiting

to happen.

I see now you believe I've won.

No, I believe your statements have a 1% probability of being true.
That is the percentage of gamblers who could win what you claim using
your strategy. Once again, I really don't care if you've won or lost,
I only wish to present the possibilities.

Is that the left hand or the right
hand saying that?? You're such a clown!

It is a mathematical fact.

>
> > Wrong again. Players are taught, they move on, and they usually
> write
> > me later thanking me for helping them win for a change.
>
> The few that win would do that, the majority that lose lick their
> wounds.

Support that assertion with facts! HAHAHA!!!

I think most will agree that people don't often admit they have been
conned. It's embarrassing. It's one of those things that con men
count on.

You're so funny so far here.

Exposing your con is fun.

i'm gonna cut you some slack because my
daughter's giving birth now so I have to run. It's nice to have a
life not controlled like little dicky's: live, sleep and eat video
poker.....

So, you're claiming that your daughter having a baby somehow makes
you "have a life"? Interesting ...

and then dream about Singer when he's daydreaming. Oh when
will my domination of this bazooka ever end..........

Da plane, da plane ... It has yet to start.

A recent study:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4293520.stm

> > > >Also, they do not gamble with the their pen names. But I do
> > > > agree they are recognizeable because they tend to play high
> > limits. However, if you read my latest post you will see that

they often make their money through promotions which actually hurts
other players more than it does the casinos.

> > >
> > > You mean like the Advantage Player who won the car at
Terrible's
> > > worth $21k and lost $28k piling up the drawing tickets? You
mean
> > like the famous guru who won the car at the Palms worth $24k

but

> lost $38k piling up the drawing tickets?
> >
> > More unverfied assertions.
>
> What do you expect me to do--identify the source, the gamblers'
> names, and what I was shown??

Unless you do you might as well spit into the wind. No one will
believe you.

That's where you're wrong. So many do believe me because they know
common sense when they hear it. the only reason you don't is because
you try to block it out since it would turn your fantasy world upside
down to accept the truth about it.

>
> However, it is not unusual for an APer to
> > lose more money than a play is worth. On the other hand, it is
not
> > unusual for an APer to break even or win money and then win the
> > promotion. Our $2000 promotion win last year occurred as we

lost

> $174 gambling, accumulated $998 in CB/BB and additional comps

that

I
> > rarely add in. Make sure to add this one to your list.
>
> The 'more than break even' story is the exception not the rule,

Lie. I suppose my $3488 winning in promotions in 2003 was just
another exception? How about $1764 in 2004 and $2835 in 2005? More
exceptions? All this while still WINNING on the gambling side. You
see promotions are just the icing on the cake. Your lies are so

easy to refute it's amazing that you would post them.

Yup--just like your hero's claims!! You're all the same but for
different reasons. They do it for perception and reputation just so
sales to the innocent won't lag. You do it simply because you want
to 'belong' to the make believe club they've established, and it
feels good to be a part of it all to someone who has never been a
part of any fantasy until now.

> and
> the losses are far greater overall for sucker AP's who get roped
into
> these things. If AP's really won more often than not, you'd see
them
> being barred and that does not happen regardless of the made up
> stories a few people post on vpFREE.

Lie. What else would we expect from a con man.

That's right--the truth and only the truth.

> >
> > Does anyone noticed that Rob always tells only the negative

part

of
> > the story. He conveniently omits the rest. That should tell you
> > something. IT'S A CON.
>
> That's because there IS no positive side to addiction.

No, it's because you'll lie at any time to further your con.

No, it's because there IS no positive side to addiction! You're
continued denial in the face of overwhelming sense confirms that
forever.

>
> > > It's so easy making others who have an
> > > inherent need to believe that advantage play works, to buy

into

> > > certain scenarios of prowess when nothing has to be proven.
> That's why I do checks on claims, and why I'm more than happy to
> serve up the truth whenever it's helpful to my readers.
>
> > Half-truths is what you excel in. It's what con men do well.
>
> What else could you possibly say being that you're one of the

sheep?

Another half truth. To be more correct you would have to say "one

of the profitable sheep". There's no problem being a sheep that
follows a mathematical proven method of gambling yielding the highest
profit potential.

The only problem is, these sheep are BLIND!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > It's simple theory vs. reality again, and you lose that one
every
> > > time.
> >
> > Not according to my bank account. It appears the reality of AP
does
> > work, while the CON of negative progressions is a disaster
waiting
> to happen.
>
> I see now you believe I've won.

No, I believe your statements have a 1% probability of being true.

Spoken like a true nerd shaking in his boots. Whenever there's a
requirement to take a stand, there's always an escape route. Familiar
with that phrase, are we???

That is the percentage of gamblers who could win what you claim

using your strategy. Once again, I really don't care if you've won or
lost, I only wish to present the possibilities.

You care more about me than the addict you live with. Nuff said.

> Is that the left hand or the right
> hand saying that?? You're such a clown!

It is a mathematical fact.

said Clarabelle.....as he counts to ten on his fingers

> >
> > > Wrong again. Players are taught, they move on, and they

usually

> > write
> > > me later thanking me for helping them win for a change.
> >
> > The few that win would do that, the majority that lose lick

their

> > wounds.
>
> Support that assertion with facts! HAHAHA!!!

I think most will agree that people don't often admit they have

been conned. It's embarrassing. It's one of those things that con men

count on.

And there's that convenient escape route once again that all fraidy
cat nerds whip out because they have little confidence in themselves
or the nonsense they spew.

>
> You're so funny so far here.

Exposing your con is fun.

And ripping you apart is fun and FUNNY!

> i'm gonna cut you some slack because my
> daughter's giving birth now so I have to run. It's nice to have a
> life not controlled like little dicky's: live, sleep and eat

video poker.....

So, you're claiming that your daughter having a baby somehow makes
you "have a life"? Interesting ...

Nah....you're probably right. Family means nothing, and family not
corrupted by vp means even less. In fact, it's so much more enjoyable
going to unhealthy casinos all the time rather than spending the time
with them and not caring in the least when the next casino visit will
be. Yeah....I think it's right & proper to have a life totally
consumed by addiction while dissing those close to you. Yup! You've
certainly got something there!!

> and then dream about Singer when he's daydreaming. Oh when
> will my domination of this bazooka ever end..........

Da plane, da plane ... It has yet to start.

If you remember, THAT plane was on its final descent---just like you.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

Not surprising that you'd spend more time using your computer looking
up things to say here than using the computer attached to your neck
to help you figure yourself out first. For example....from your own
posting:

"The researchers drew up a list of criteria for lying, cheating and
deceiving, including habits such as conning people or behaving
manipulatively, and telling lies in order to obtain sickness
benefits."

Since you pride yourself on the manipulation of the missus into going
to casinos with you while tricking her into making believe there's
nothing wrong with being addicted, YOU'RE apparently the victim of
your own CON!

Next time you toss egg, make sure you're not in the line of fire!
HAHAHAHAHA!

BTW--Here's something a friend just sent me. It's a post on the
twoplustwo forum from an interview with actor James Woods:

"In fact, I'll tell you how I got really interested in Texas hold'em.
A year ago this August, I was with a friend of mine in Vegas and we
were playing double bonus video poker, where you actually had a
slight advantage, and, according to the Nevada gaming regulations,
you had to pay out according to the specified percentages. But I
noticed after 9/11 that the video poker machines just weren't
streaking. It was just a gambler's feeling, but I got to talking to
one of the slot hosts and he mentioned something about a new chip. I
said, come on, don't shit with me, what's going on. He said nothing
and shrugged it off. So I got into my detective instincts and got to
talking to one of the tech guys and I said: "So how is that new chip
in the video poker machines?" and he said: "You mean the new yield
management chip?" and I say: "Yeah that's the one, the yield
management chip. What's the deal there?" And he said that after 9/11
the casinos were suffering and they petitioned the Nevada State
Gaming Commission and asked them if they could still pay the same
percentages, but defer the streaks by like a million hands.

You asked for more on the cold/hot cycles being programmed into the
game, here's more of it served up to you! Whatcha gonna say now,
little dicky..... No sniveling.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

A recent study:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4293520.stm

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>A recent study:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4293520.stm

Not surprising that you'd spend more time using your computer

looking

up things to say here than using the computer attached to your neck
to help you figure yourself out first. For example....from your own
posting:

"The researchers drew up a list of criteria for lying, cheating and
deceiving, including habits such as conning people or behaving
manipulatively, and telling lies in order to obtain sickness
benefits."

I think this pretty much describes our little Robbie.

Since you pride yourself on the manipulation of the missus into

going

to casinos with you while tricking her into making believe there's
nothing wrong with being addicted, YOU'RE apparently the victim of
your own CON!

Another attempt at manipulation by stating a LIE as if it were a
fact. This fits the description of a "habitual liar" perfectly.
Thanks Rob for showing your true colors so quickly.

Next time you toss egg, make sure you're not in the line of fire!
HAHAHAHAHA!

I'm not. By the way, this is not egg. This is fact, you know, those
little things you ignore.

BTW--Here's something a friend just sent me. It's a post on the
twoplustwo forum from an interview with actor James Woods:

"In fact, I'll tell you how I got really interested in Texas

hold'em.

A year ago this August, I was with a friend of mine in Vegas and we
were playing double bonus video poker, where you actually had a
slight advantage, and, according to the Nevada gaming regulations,
you had to pay out according to the specified percentages. But I
noticed after 9/11 that the video poker machines just weren't
streaking. It was just a gambler's feeling, but I got to talking to
one of the slot hosts and he mentioned something about a new chip.

I

said, come on, don't shit with me, what's going on. He said nothing
and shrugged it off. So I got into my detective instincts and got

to

talking to one of the tech guys and I said: "So how is that new

chip

in the video poker machines?" and he said: "You mean the new yield
management chip?" and I say: "Yeah that's the one, the yield
management chip. What's the deal there?" And he said that after

9/11

the casinos were suffering and they petitioned the Nevada State
Gaming Commission and asked them if they could still pay the same
percentages, but defer the streaks by like a million hands.

The con continues. By the way, I saw this interview several months
ago and laughed out loud. I suspect he hit one of those cold streaks
that every gambler has on occasion (I had one last fall). However, I
know better and guess what? The streak ended, the winning returned
and no chips were changed.

Isn't little Robbie the one who claimed that actors are a bunch of
idiots when they protested GWB policies? Now, it seems they are much
smarter when one says something Robbie likes. Need I say more.

You asked for more on the cold/hot cycles being programmed into the
game, here's more of it served up to you! Whatcha gonna say now,
little dicky..... No sniveling.

More mythical nonsense. It appears you're claiming an actor is now
the end all of VP knowledge. Where will it end? Funny, but those of
us who play almost every day haven't noticed any changes.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > It's simple theory vs. reality again, and you lose that one
> every
> > > > time.
> > >
> > > Not according to my bank account. It appears the reality of

AP

> does
> > > work, while the CON of negative progressions is a disaster
> waiting
> > to happen.
> >
> > I see now you believe I've won.
>
> No, I believe your statements have a 1% probability of being

true.

Spoken like a true nerd shaking in his boots. Whenever there's a
requirement to take a stand, there's always an escape route.

Familiar

with that phrase, are we???

Another attempt at stating a lie as a fact. You've backed down from
every one of the bets I've offered you. That is a fact and anyone can
check the archives for verification. The 1% value is another fact,
like it or not, that is what the math predicts.

> That is the percentage of gamblers who could win what you claim
using your strategy. Once again, I really don't care if you've won

or

lost, I only wish to present the possibilities.

You care more about me than the addict you live with. Nuff said.

Lie. Another example of a misaligned brain? If there's one thing
everyone who reads this forum can agree on it's that I care nothing
for you.

> > > > Wrong again. Players are taught, they move on, and they
usually
> > > write
> > > > me later thanking me for helping them win for a change.
> > >
> > > The few that win would do that, the majority that lose lick
their
> > > wounds.
> >
> > Support that assertion with facts! HAHAHA!!!
>
> I think most will agree that people don't often admit they have
been conned. It's embarrassing. It's one of those things that con

men

> count on.

And there's that convenient escape route once again that all fraidy
cat nerds whip out because they have little confidence in

themselves

or the nonsense they spew.

Oh, you mean common sense. Yes, that's what we spew. I see you
couldn't think of any intelligent comeback and reverted to your
normal defective brain babbling instead.

>
> >
> > You're so funny so far here.
>
> Exposing your con is fun.

And ripping you apart is fun and FUNNY!

Let me know when you plan on starting ... Unfortunately for little
Robbie, he believes everyone thinks like he does. He doesn't realize
that his brain is the defective one. He probably believes people
think his babbling insults are funny instead of making him look
childish and impotent. Sorry, little man, but now that you have been
labeled the worst is yet to come.

>
> > i'm gonna cut you some slack because my
> > daughter's giving birth now so I have to run. It's nice to have

a

> > life not controlled like little dicky's: live, sleep and eat
video poker.....
>
> So, you're claiming that your daughter having a baby somehow

makes

> you "have a life"? Interesting ...

Nah....you're probably right. Family means nothing, and family not
corrupted by vp means even less.

No, it has nothing to do with family. It has to do with emphasizing
family as the ONLY thing. Typical behavior for someone who has no
friends (I wonder why). It's too bad your family is stuck with you.

In fact, it's so much more enjoyable
going to unhealthy casinos all the time rather than spending the

time

with them and not caring in the least when the next casino visit

will

be. Yeah....I think it's right & proper to have a life totally
consumed by addiction while dissing those close to you. Yup! You've
certainly got something there!!

I sure do. You are a loner that dominates his family. You have no
other choice as no one else would put up with your behavior. Normal
people, with normal brains, expand their horizons beyond family. They
have both family and friends.

>
> > and then dream about Singer when he's daydreaming. Oh when
> > will my domination of this bazooka ever end..........
>
> Da plane, da plane ... It has yet to start.

If you remember, THAT plane was on its final descent---just like

you.

Wrong again. A rather poor attempt to save face. Now that your
behavior has been classifed and catalogued I will simply point out
the facts, as usual.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > >Also, they do not gamble with the their pen names. But I

do

> > > > > agree they are recognizeable because they tend to play

high

> > > limits. However, if you read my latest post you will see that
they often make their money through promotions which actually hurts
other players more than it does the casinos.
> > > >
> > > > You mean like the Advantage Player who won the car at
> Terrible's
> > > > worth $21k and lost $28k piling up the drawing tickets? You
> mean
> > > like the famous guru who won the car at the Palms worth $24k
but
> > lost $38k piling up the drawing tickets?
> > >
> > > More unverfied assertions.
> >
> > What do you expect me to do--identify the source, the gamblers'
> > names, and what I was shown??
>
> Unless you do you might as well spit into the wind. No one will
> believe you.

That's where you're wrong. So many do believe me because they know
common sense when they hear it.

A few will fall for your lies, the vast majority can see that common
sense requires them to avoid Rob Singer like the plague.

the only reason you don't is because
you try to block it out since it would turn your fantasy world

upside

down to accept the truth about it.

I don't need to block out anything. The facts have way of pointing
out the truth. Robbie constantly uses terms like "voodoo math", "math
nonsense", "math theory", etc in order to claim that math somehow
doesn't apply to VP while it applies to everything else in the
universe. That is what is called "block(ing) out" "the truth".

>
> >
> > However, it is not unusual for an APer to
> > > lose more money than a play is worth. On the other hand, it

is

> not
> > > unusual for an APer to break even or win money and then win

the

> > > promotion. Our $2000 promotion win last year occurred as we
lost
> > $174 gambling, accumulated $998 in CB/BB and additional comps
that
> I
> > > rarely add in. Make sure to add this one to your list.
> >
> > The 'more than break even' story is the exception not the rule,
>
> Lie. I suppose my $3488 winning in promotions in 2003 was just
> another exception? How about $1764 in 2004 and $2835 in 2005?

More

> exceptions? All this while still WINNING on the gambling side.

You

> see promotions are just the icing on the cake. Your lies are so
easy to refute it's amazing that you would post them.

Yup--just like your hero's claims!!

Yes, the facts, once again ...

You're all the same but for
different reasons. They do it for perception and reputation just so
sales to the innocent won't lag.

Lie, you are so jealous it drips off of you again. Your failures make
that defective brain think it's OK to lie about them. Sorry, but
those of us with normal brains would rather deal with facts.

You do it simply because you want
to 'belong' to the make believe club they've established, and it
feels good to be a part of it all to someone who has never been a
part of any fantasy until now.

I still have no desire to "belong" to anything. Especially, since
this is another one of your fabrications, made up only because you
have no other choice. I have no reason to lie. Your house of cards is
tumbling down around you little Robbie.

>
> > and
> > the losses are far greater overall for sucker AP's who get

roped

> into
> > these things. If AP's really won more often than not, you'd see
> them
> > being barred and that does not happen regardless of the made up
> > stories a few people post on vpFREE.
>
> Lie. What else would we expect from a con man.

That's right--the truth and only the truth.

Lie.

>
> > >
> > > Does anyone noticed that Rob always tells only the negative
part
> of
> > > the story. He conveniently omits the rest. That should tell

you

> > > something. IT'S A CON.
> >
> > That's because there IS no positive side to addiction.
>
> No, it's because you'll lie at any time to further your con.

No, it's because there IS no positive side to addiction! You're
continued denial in the face of overwhelming sense confirms that
forever.

Same old Rob, when confronted with the truth he always starts telling
lies. Naturally, he isn't that smart so the only thing his defective
brain can come up with is his own addiction problems. Very, very sad.

>
> >
> > > > It's so easy making others who have an
> > > > inherent need to believe that advantage play works, to buy
into
> > > > certain scenarios of prowess when nothing has to be proven.
> > That's why I do checks on claims, and why I'm more than happy

to

> > serve up the truth whenever it's helpful to my readers.
> >
> > > Half-truths is what you excel in. It's what con men do well.
> >
> > What else could you possibly say being that you're one of the
sheep?
>
> Another half truth. To be more correct you would have to say "one
of the profitable sheep". There's no problem being a sheep that
follows a mathematical proven method of gambling yielding the

highest

profit potential.

The only problem is, these sheep are BLIND!

No, we can all verify the math, the gambling regs, and use common
sense. Only the BLIND would follow little Robbies' con.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
>
> >A recent study:
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4293520.stm
>
> Not surprising that you'd spend more time using your computer
looking
> up things to say here than using the computer attached to your

neck

> to help you figure yourself out first. For example....from your

own

> posting:
>
> "The researchers drew up a list of criteria for lying, cheating

and deceiving, including habits such as conning people or behaving

> manipulatively, and telling lies in order to obtain sickness
> benefits."

I think this pretty much describes our little Robbie.

Thank you for reading the entire post first and answering the only
way any self-incriminating BS'er could save face.

> Since you pride yourself on the manipulation of the missus into
going to casinos with you while tricking her into making believe

there's nothing wrong with being addicted, YOU'RE apparently the
victim of your own CON!

Another attempt at manipulation by stating a LIE as if it were a
fact. This fits the description of a "habitual liar" perfectly.
Thanks Rob for showing your true colors so quickly.

Show us the 'lie'! It is a solid fact that you've ruined your poor
wife's life with your own degenerate addiction. Whatever color that
is - and it's probably yellow - you wear it well.

> Next time you toss egg, make sure you're not in the line of fire!
> HAHAHAHAHA!

I'm not. By the way, this is not egg. This is fact, you know, those
little things you ignore.

Fact somehow has a habit of turning into egg the closer it gets to
you.....

> BTW--Here's something a friend just sent me. It's a post on the
> twoplustwo forum from an interview with actor James Woods:
>
> "In fact, I'll tell you how I got really interested in Texas
hold'em.
> A year ago this August, I was with a friend of mine in Vegas and

we

> were playing double bonus video poker, where you actually had a
> slight advantage, and, according to the Nevada gaming

regulations,

> you had to pay out according to the specified percentages. But I
> noticed after 9/11 that the video poker machines just weren't
> streaking. It was just a gambler's feeling, but I got to talking

to

> one of the slot hosts and he mentioned something about a new

chip.

I
> said, come on, don't shit with me, what's going on. He said

nothing

> and shrugged it off. So I got into my detective instincts and got
to
> talking to one of the tech guys and I said: "So how is that new
chip
> in the video poker machines?" and he said: "You mean the new

yield

> management chip?" and I say: "Yeah that's the one, the yield
> management chip. What's the deal there?" And he said that after
9/11
> the casinos were suffering and they petitioned the Nevada State
> Gaming Commission and asked them if they could still pay the same
> percentages, but defer the streaks by like a million hands.

The con continues. By the way, I saw this interview several months
ago and laughed out loud.

Sorry to say it was not on TV. Were you there in person? HAHAHA!!

I suspect he hit one of those cold streaks that every gambler has on

occasion (I had one last fall). However, I know better and guess
what? The streak ended, the winning returned and no chips were
changed.

Funny, his losing wasn't even a topic of discussion. Are you a bit
more comfy now that you changed the subject once again?

Isn't little Robbie the one who claimed that actors are a bunch of
idiots when they protested GWB policies? Now, it seems they are

much smarter when one says something Robbie likes. Need I say more.

We don't need to hear any more lies from you. I don't recall naming
James Woods as one of thos Hollywood bafoons who sit at the right
hand of none other than fat boy Mikey Moore! I understand your need
to make things up when you've got no where to go. Please do it
without getting caught time and again.

> You asked for more on the cold/hot cycles being programmed into

the

> game, here's more of it served up to you! Whatcha gonna say now,
> little dicky..... No sniveling.

More mythical nonsense. It appears you're claiming an actor is now
the end all of VP knowledge. Where will it end? Funny, but those of
us who play almost every day haven't noticed any changes.

No, he's but yet another respected personality who tells the truth
about what he hears and sees. And those of you addicted fools who
play like there's no tomorrow wouldn't notice anything anyway. you
sit stupified at the same machine for hours on end, playing aimlessly
into the zombie-zone. You idiots wouldn't notice if Paris Hilton
unzipped your fly and started humming Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

> > No, I believe your statements have a 1% probability of being
true.
>
> Spoken like a true nerd shaking in his boots. Whenever there's a
> requirement to take a stand, there's always an escape route.
Familiar with that phrase, are we???

Another attempt at stating a lie as a fact. You've backed down from
every one of the bets I've offered you. That is a fact and anyone

can check the archives for verification.

How about you check out your own lie and report back? Better yet, re-
read my article and you will be set free!

The 1% value is another fact,

like it or not, that is what the math predicts. That is the

percentage of gamblers who could win what you claim

> using your strategy. Once again, I really don't care if you've

won or lost, I only wish to present the possibilities.

>
> You care more about me than the addict you live with. Nuff said.

Lie. Another example of a misaligned brain? If there's one thing
everyone who reads this forum can agree on it's that I care nothing
for you.

Read it and weep at what's really going on here. We need some
weepers. I'm LAUGHING!!

Wrong again. Players are taught, they move on, and they usually

write me later thanking me for helping them win for a change.

> > > >
> > > > The few that win would do that, the majority that lose lick
> their wounds.
> > >
> > > Support that assertion with facts! HAHAHA!!!
> >
> > I think most will agree that people don't often admit they have
> been conned. It's embarrassing. It's one of those things that con
men count on.
>
> And there's that convenient escape route once again that all

fraidy

> cat nerds whip out because they have little confidence in
themselves or the nonsense they spew.

Oh, you mean common sense. Yes, that's what we spew.

NONsense. Just as written to your horror!

I see you

couldn't think of any intelligent comeback and reverted to your
normal defective brain babbling instead.

And little dicky's common denominator: "I think most people will
agree" which is ALWAYS used as what he calls FACT!! HAHAHA!! Please
stop me from the laughing!!!

> > > You're so funny so far here.
> >
> > Exposing your con is fun.
>
> And ripping you apart is fun and FUNNY!

Let me know when you plan on starting ... Unfortunately for little
Robbie, he believes everyone thinks like he does. He doesn't

realize

that his brain is the defective one. He probably believes people
think his babbling insults are funny instead of making him look
childish and impotent. Sorry, little man, but now that you have

been

labeled the worst is yet to come.

On and on with the obvious nervous string of words until he finally
finds some that might make him feel better after getting his bell
rung. when will he ever learn.....

> > So, you're claiming that your daughter having a baby somehow
makes you "have a life"? Interesting ...
>
> Nah....you're probably right. Family means nothing, and family

not corrupted by vp means even less.

No, it has nothing to do with family.

AHAHAHAHA! This is too much! Bingo--a direct hit AGAIN!

It has to do with emphasizing

family as the ONLY thing. Typical behavior for someone who has no
friends (I wonder why). It's too bad your family is stuck with you.

Oh, have I mentioned how many friends I have? Let's see, you must
know more than me--let's have the FACTS! Naturally someone who has a
gambling problem sees the same dorks every time he's in the casinos,
and those are what you consider frineds?! HAHA! I need a breather....
OK, imagine this. Fat people everywhere. Oh my God, it must be a room
full of little dicky's video-poker-playing FRIENDS! YIKES!!

> In fact, it's so much more enjoyable
> going to unhealthy casinos all the time rather than spending the
time with them and not caring in the least when the next casino

visit will be. Yeah....I think it's right & proper to have a life
totally consumed by addiction while dissing those close to you. Yup!
You've certainly got something there!!

I sure do. You are a loner that dominates his family. You have no
other choice as no one else would put up with your behavior. Normal
people, with normal brains, expand their horizons beyond family.

They have both family and friends.

AHAHAH!! Help me stop laughing!!!! Expanded 'horizons' means visiting
casinos, breathing in the choking air, treating the eyes to hours of
seeing obese, self-disrespecting fools with no way out of the ruts
they've created for themselves, and GAMBLING non-stop! Oh! it
hurts.....

> > > and then dream about Singer when he's daydreaming. Oh when
> > > will my domination of this bazooka ever end..........
> >
> > Da plane, da plane ... It has yet to start.
>
> If you remember, THAT plane was on its final descent---just like
you.

Wrong again. A rather poor attempt to save face. Now that your
behavior has been classifed and catalogued I will simply point out
the facts, as usual.

Then start by pointing out your first fact: What does that plane have
to do with this stuff?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

You mean like the Advantage Player who won the car at
Terrible's worth $21k and lost $28k piling up the drawing tickets?

You mean like the famous guru who won the car at the Palms worth $24k

> but lost $38k piling up the drawing tickets?

A few will fall for your lies, the vast majority can see that

common sense requires them to avoid Rob Singer like the plague.

I think I'll leave that up there just to bother you with the truth
some more.

> the only reason you don't is because
> you try to block it out since it would turn your fantasy world
upside down to accept the truth about it.

I don't need to block out anything. The facts have way of pointing
out the truth. Robbie constantly uses terms like "voodoo

math", "math

nonsense", "math theory", etc in order to claim that math somehow
doesn't apply to VP while it applies to everything else in the
universe. That is what is called "block(ing) out" "the truth".

Here we talk about a specific event, and little dicky, coming apart
at the seams, shuffles it into generalizations because he just can't
dispute the facts I reported. THAT's what's called blocking out
reality and truth--which your kind is so in need of doing.

> > > However, it is not unusual for an APer to
> > > > lose more money than a play is worth. On the other hand, it
is
> > not
> > > > unusual for an APer to break even or win money and then win
the
> > > > promotion. Our $2000 promotion win last year occurred as we
> lost
> > > $174 gambling, accumulated $998 in CB/BB and additional comps
> that
> > I
> > > > rarely add in. Make sure to add this one to your list.
> > >
> > > The 'more than break even' story is the exception not the

rule,

> >
> > Lie. I suppose my $3488 winning in promotions in 2003 was just
> > another exception? How about $1764 in 2004 and $2835 in 2005?
More
> > exceptions? All this while still WINNING on the gambling side.
You
> > see promotions are just the icing on the cake. Your lies are so
> easy to refute it's amazing that you would post them.
>
> Yup--just like your hero's claims!!

Yes, the facts, once again ...

Then prove them!! What's the matter, can't do it???

> You're all the same but for
> different reasons. They do it for perception and reputation just

so sales to the innocent won't lag.

Lie, you are so jealous it drips off of you again. Your failures

make

that defective brain think it's OK to lie about them. Sorry, but
those of us with normal brains would rather deal with facts.

Kinda stings when it first hits, doesn't it. That's how the trith
feels when you're trying to ignore it.

> You do it simply because you want
> to 'belong' to the make believe club they've established, and it
> feels good to be a part of it all to someone who has never been a
> part of any fantasy until now.

I still have no desire to "belong" to anything.

Denyer.

Especially, since

this is another one of your fabrications, made up only because you
have no other choice. I have no reason to lie. Your house of cards

is tumbling down around you little Robbie.

You have every reason to lie. In fact, you lie so much your stories
are like run-on sentences.

> > > > Does anyone noticed that Rob always tells only the negative
> part of the story. He conveniently omits the rest. That should

tell you something. IT'S A CON.

> > >
> > > That's because there IS no positive side to addiction.
> >
> > No, it's because you'll lie at any time to further your con.
>
> No, it's because there IS no positive side to addiction! You're
> continued denial in the face of overwhelming sense confirms that
> forever.

Same old Rob, when confronted with the truth he always starts

telling lies. Naturally, he isn't that smart so the only thing his
defective brain can come up with is his own addiction problems. Very,
very sad.

As is typical, little dicky can't handle the truth, so he wanders as
far away from it as his nervous little pea brain will allow. But I
will always be there to put him back on course!

It's so easy making others who have an
> > > > > inherent need to believe that advantage play works, to

buy into certain scenarios of prowess when nothing has to be proven.

> > > That's why I do checks on claims, and why I'm more than happy
to serve up the truth whenever it's helpful to my readers.
> > >
> > > > Half-truths is what you excel in. It's what con men do well.
> > >
> > > What else could you possibly say being that you're one of the
> sheep?
> >
> > Another half truth. To be more correct you would have to

say "one

> of the profitable sheep". There's no problem being a sheep that
> follows a mathematical proven method of gambling yielding the
highest
> profit potential.
>
> The only problem is, these sheep are BLIND!

No, we can all verify the math, the gambling regs, and use common
sense. Only the BLIND would follow little Robbies' con.

You select which part of the math to use and when, which regs to
selectively interpret and how, and when to close your eyes to the
truth. If you were a cartoon character you'd do a lot better.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > >A recent study:
> > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4293520.stm
> >
> > Not surprising that you'd spend more time using your computer
> looking
> > up things to say here than using the computer attached to your
neck
> > to help you figure yourself out first. For example....from your
own
> > posting:
> >
> > "The researchers drew up a list of criteria for lying, cheating
and deceiving, including habits such as conning people or behaving
> > manipulatively, and telling lies in order to obtain sickness
> > benefits."
>
> I think this pretty much describes our little Robbie.

Thank you for reading the entire post first and answering the only
way any self-incriminating BS'er could save face.

Lie, I didn't read it first, but what difference would it have made.
It still describes you to a tee.

> > Since you pride yourself on the manipulation of the missus into
> going to casinos with you while tricking her into making believe
there's nothing wrong with being addicted, YOU'RE apparently the
victim of your own CON!
>
> Another attempt at manipulation by stating a LIE as if it were a
> fact. This fits the description of a "habitual liar" perfectly.
> Thanks Rob for showing your true colors so quickly.

Show us the 'lie'!

The whole statement. Especially, since I've told you more than once
that my wife is the real gambler of the family.

It is a solid fact that you've ruined your poor
wife's life with your own degenerate addiction. Whatever color that
is - and it's probably yellow - you wear it well.

Lie, and much more evidence that I could have have wished for. The
truth is that these "habitual liars" will manufacture stories to
support their lies. The facts are all there, little man.

> > Next time you toss egg, make sure you're not in the line of

fire!

> > HAHAHAHAHA!
>
> I'm not. By the way, this is not egg. This is fact, you know,

those

> little things you ignore.

Fact somehow has a habit of turning into egg the closer it gets to
you.....

Nope, it portrays Rob Singer in a bright light.

> > BTW--Here's something a friend just sent me. It's a post on the
> > twoplustwo forum from an interview with actor James Woods:
> >
> > "In fact, I'll tell you how I got really interested in Texas
> hold'em.
> > A year ago this August, I was with a friend of mine in Vegas

and

we
> > were playing double bonus video poker, where you actually had a
> > slight advantage, and, according to the Nevada gaming
regulations,
> > you had to pay out according to the specified percentages. But

I

> > noticed after 9/11 that the video poker machines just weren't
> > streaking. It was just a gambler's feeling, but I got to

talking

to
> > one of the slot hosts and he mentioned something about a new
chip.
> I
> > said, come on, don't shit with me, what's going on. He said
nothing
> > and shrugged it off. So I got into my detective instincts and

got

> to
> > talking to one of the tech guys and I said: "So how is that new
> chip
> > in the video poker machines?" and he said: "You mean the new
yield
> > management chip?" and I say: "Yeah that's the one, the yield
> > management chip. What's the deal there?" And he said that after
> 9/11
> > the casinos were suffering and they petitioned the Nevada State
> > Gaming Commission and asked them if they could still pay the

same

> > percentages, but defer the streaks by like a million hands.
>
> The con continues. By the way, I saw this interview several

months

> ago and laughed out loud.

Sorry to say it was not on TV. Were you there in person? HAHAHA!!

It was on TV. I believe it was on a golf telecast where he was
involved in a pro-am. They had an interview with James Wood about his
gambling which was strange to say the least.

>I suspect he hit one of those cold streaks that every gambler has

on

occasion (I had one last fall). However, I know better and guess
what? The streak ended, the winning returned and no chips were
changed.

Funny, his losing wasn't even a topic of discussion. Are you a bit
more comfy now that you changed the subject once again?

"... noticed after 9/11 that the video poker machines just weren't
streaking" is what you stated. Then you mentioned, "defer" the
streaks. I took this to mean losing. In any event, nothing has
changed since 9/11.

>
> Isn't little Robbie the one who claimed that actors are a bunch

of

> idiots when they protested GWB policies? Now, it seems they are
much smarter when one says something Robbie likes. Need I say more.

We don't need to hear any more lies from you. I don't recall naming
James Woods as one of thos Hollywood bafoons who sit at the right
hand of none other than fat boy Mikey Moore! I understand your need
to make things up when you've got no where to go. Please do it
without getting caught time and again.

No, you used your normal generalizations. The point, that appears to
have gone right over your head, is that you SELECTIVELY decide who to
believe as it is convenient for you. Clearly, James Wood knows
nothing about VP machines and how they operate. This whole discussion
is ridiculous since NV regs require the machines to be random with no
secondary decisions.

> > You asked for more on the cold/hot cycles being programmed into
the
> > game, here's more of it served up to you! Whatcha gonna say

now,

> > little dicky..... No sniveling.

> More mythical nonsense. It appears you're claiming an actor is

now

> the end all of VP knowledge. Where will it end? Funny, but those

of

> us who play almost every day haven't noticed any changes.

No, he's but yet another respected personality who tells the truth
about what he hears and sees.

Trying to put yourself and James Wood in the same category is another
example of defective white matter. He is a respected actor, you are a
LAF and a con man.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> You mean like the Advantage Player who won the car at
> Terrible's worth $21k and lost $28k piling up the drawing

tickets?

You mean like the famous guru who won the car at the Palms worth

$24k

> > but lost $38k piling up the drawing tickets?

> A few will fall for your lies, the vast majority can see that
common sense requires them to avoid Rob Singer like the plague.

I think I'll leave that up there just to bother you with the truth
some more.

Works for me.

>
> > the only reason you don't is because
> > you try to block it out since it would turn your fantasy world
> upside down to accept the truth about it.
>
> I don't need to block out anything. The facts have way of

pointing

> out the truth. Robbie constantly uses terms like "voodoo
math", "math
> nonsense", "math theory", etc in order to claim that math somehow
> doesn't apply to VP while it applies to everything else in the
> universe. That is what is called "block(ing) out" "the truth".

Here we talk about a specific event, and little dicky, coming apart
at the seams, shuffles it into generalizations because he just

can't

dispute the facts I reported.

You didn't report a fact. For all we know it is a complete
fabrication made up to support your con. However, anyone who gambles
knows that specific events are meaningless. Does the fact that you
don't hit a RF after being dealt 4 have any bearing on the next time
you have a chance? Of course not. You can't even come up with a
reasonable argument to support your BS.

THAT's what's called blocking out
reality and truth--which your kind is so in need of doing.

No, it is called sticking to "reality and truth".

> > > > However, it is not unusual for an APer to
> > > > > lose more money than a play is worth. On the other hand,

it

> is
> > > not
> > > > > unusual for an APer to break even or win money and then

win

> the
> > > > > promotion. Our $2000 promotion win last year occurred as

we

> > lost
> > > > $174 gambling, accumulated $998 in CB/BB and additional

comps

> > that
> > > I
> > > > > rarely add in. Make sure to add this one to your list.
> > > >
> > > > The 'more than break even' story is the exception not the
rule,
> > >
> > > Lie. I suppose my $3488 winning in promotions in 2003 was

just

> > > another exception? How about $1764 in 2004 and $2835 in 2005?
> More
> > > exceptions? All this while still WINNING on the gambling

side.

> You
> > > see promotions are just the icing on the cake. Your lies are

so

> > easy to refute it's amazing that you would post them.
> >
> > Yup--just like your hero's claims!!
>
> Yes, the facts, once again ...

Then prove them!! What's the matter, can't do it???

I have the 1099s. Want to make a bet?

>
> > You're all the same but for
> > different reasons. They do it for perception and reputation

just

so sales to the innocent won't lag.
>
> Lie, you are so jealous it drips off of you again. Your failures
make
> that defective brain think it's OK to lie about them. Sorry, but
> those of us with normal brains would rather deal with facts.

Kinda stings when it first hits, doesn't it. That's how the trith
feels when you're trying to ignore it.

Is that how it feels, I guess you're the only one who would know.

>
> > You do it simply because you want
> > to 'belong' to the make believe club they've established, and

it

> > feels good to be a part of it all to someone who has never been

a

> > part of any fantasy until now.
>
> I still have no desire to "belong" to anything.

Denyer.

Fact.

Especially, since
> this is another one of your fabrications, made up only because

you

> have no other choice. I have no reason to lie. Your house of

cards

is tumbling down around you little Robbie.

You have every reason to lie. In fact, you lie so much your stories
are like run-on sentences.

I have no reason to lie, never have, never will. Of course, your
defective brain has to invent something to protect "the con", so you
come up with this ridiculous nonsense about "belonging". Of course,
there is nothing to "belong" to, which makes this little invention of
yours as obvious as can be. You'd think you could come up with a
better lie than this. You've had so much practice.

> > > > > Does anyone noticed that Rob always tells only the

negative

> > part of the story. He conveniently omits the rest. That should
tell you something. IT'S A CON.
> > > >
> > > > That's because there IS no positive side to addiction.
> > >
> > > No, it's because you'll lie at any time to further your con.
> >
> > No, it's because there IS no positive side to addiction! You're
> > continued denial in the face of overwhelming sense confirms

that

> > forever.
>
> Same old Rob, when confronted with the truth he always starts
telling lies. Naturally, he isn't that smart so the only thing his
defective brain can come up with is his own addiction problems.

Very,

very sad.

As is typical, little dicky can't handle the truth, so he wanders

as

far away from it as his nervous little pea brain will allow. But I
will always be there to put him back on course!

Of course you will, little Robbie. And, of course it will be more
lies and lies. It's the only thing your defective brain can do.

> It's so easy making others who have an
> > > > > > inherent need to believe that advantage play works, to
buy into certain scenarios of prowess when nothing has to be

proven.

> > > > That's why I do checks on claims, and why I'm more than

happy

> to serve up the truth whenever it's helpful to my readers.
> > > >
> > > > > Half-truths is what you excel in. It's what con men do

well.

> > > >
> > > > What else could you possibly say being that you're one of

the

> > sheep?
> > >
> > > Another half truth. To be more correct you would have to
say "one
> > of the profitable sheep". There's no problem being a sheep that
> > follows a mathematical proven method of gambling yielding the
> highest
> > profit potential.
> >
> > The only problem is, these sheep are BLIND!
>
> No, we can all verify the math, the gambling regs, and use common
> sense. Only the BLIND would follow little Robbies' con.

You select which part of the math to use and when,

Nope, I use the math required to analyze VP. You know, ASMD.

which regs to
selectively interpret and how,

You mean those NV gaming regs where I posted the reference for anyone
to read and interpret? Could you please try to lie a little less
obviously?

and when to close your eyes to the
truth. If you were a cartoon character you'd do a lot better.

Eyes wild open and presenting the facts ... for all to see.

> > > "The researchers drew up a list of criteria for lying,

cheating and deceiving, including habits such as conning people or
behaving

> > > manipulatively, and telling lies in order to obtain sickness
> > > benefits."
> >
> > I think this pretty much describes our little Robbie.
>
> Thank you for reading the entire post first and answering the

only way any self-incriminating BS'er could save face.

Lie, I didn't read it first, but what difference would it have made.

Did I mention dicky the denyer?

It still describes you to a tee.

The fact that you've obviously been scrambling arount the Internet to
put your hate of me into words shows a lack of self-confidence and an
obvious making-up of your fantasy about me. It also shows a no-breain
at work! What's funny is I turned the tide on you...again. You've
printed your own personality without even realizing it!

>
> > > Since you pride yourself on the manipulation of the missus

into

> > going to casinos with you while tricking her into making

believe

> there's nothing wrong with being addicted, YOU'RE apparently the
> victim of your own CON!
> >
> > Another attempt at manipulation by stating a LIE as if it were

a

> > fact. This fits the description of a "habitual liar" perfectly.
> > Thanks Rob for showing your true colors so quickly.
>
> Show us the 'lie'!

The whole statement. Especially, since I've told you more than once
that my wife is the real gambler of the family.

Yes we know....blame her for your problems. The typical cowardly
statement form all pathological problem gamblers. Please change your
tune--this one's too depressing.

> It is a solid fact that you've ruined your poor
> wife's life with your own degenerate addiction. Whatever color

that

> is - and it's probably yellow - you wear it well.

Lie, and much more evidence that I could have have wished for. The
truth is that these "habitual liars" will manufacture stories to
support their lies. The facts are all there, little man.

All you're doing is confirming your involvement with a despicable
application of your gambling problem. I really don't know if there is
a lower form of human--at least on THIS planet.
  

> > > Next time you toss egg, make sure you're not in the line of
fire!
> > > HAHAHAHAHA!
> >
> > I'm not. By the way, this is not egg. This is fact, you know,
those
> > little things you ignore.
>
> Fact somehow has a habit of turning into egg the closer it gets

to

> you.....

Nope, it portrays Rob Singer in a bright light.

Ever notice how blaze' your attempts at being clever are next to
mine??

>
> > > BTW--Here's something a friend just sent me. It's a post on

the

> > > twoplustwo forum from an interview with actor James Woods:
> > >
> > > "In fact, I'll tell you how I got really interested in Texas
> > hold'em.
> > > A year ago this August, I was with a friend of mine in Vegas
and
> we
> > > were playing double bonus video poker, where you actually had

a

> > > slight advantage, and, according to the Nevada gaming
> regulations,
> > > you had to pay out according to the specified percentages.

But

I
> > > noticed after 9/11 that the video poker machines just weren't
> > > streaking. It was just a gambler's feeling, but I got to
talking
> to
> > > one of the slot hosts and he mentioned something about a new
> chip.
> > I
> > > said, come on, don't shit with me, what's going on. He said
> nothing
> > > and shrugged it off. So I got into my detective instincts and
got
> > to
> > > talking to one of the tech guys and I said: "So how is that

new

> > chip
> > > in the video poker machines?" and he said: "You mean the new
> yield
> > > management chip?" and I say: "Yeah that's the one, the yield
> > > management chip. What's the deal there?" And he said that

after

> > 9/11
> > > the casinos were suffering and they petitioned the Nevada

State

> > > Gaming Commission and asked them if they could still pay the
same
> > > percentages, but defer the streaks by like a million hands.
> >
> > The con continues. By the way, I saw this interview several
months
> > ago and laughed out loud.
>
> Sorry to say it was not on TV. Were you there in person? HAHAHA!!

It was on TV. I believe it was on a golf telecast where he was
involved in a pro-am. They had an interview with James Wood about

his gambling which was strange to say the least.

Read my lips again: IT was not on TV. Some other on-the-fly
discussion about it is where you're caught with your pants down
again. Selective interpretation--ever heard of it??

>
> >I suspect he hit one of those cold streaks that every gambler

has

on
> occasion (I had one last fall). However, I know better and guess
> what? The streak ended, the winning returned and no chips were
> changed.
>
> Funny, his losing wasn't even a topic of discussion. Are you a

bit more comfy now that you changed the subject once again?

"... noticed after 9/11 that the video poker machines just weren't
streaking" is what you stated. Then you mentioned, "defer" the
streaks. I took this to mean losing. In any event, nothing has
changed since 9/11.

James Woods says it has and little dicky says it hasn't.
Hmmmm....Whom do we believe??? Of course you selectively
interpreted the message however you wanted. that's you in a nutshell.
You have no way to face reality so you use this concept constantly.
Only problem is, it craps on you every time thanks to me.

> >
> > Isn't little Robbie the one who claimed that actors are a bunch
of
> > idiots when they protested GWB policies? Now, it seems they are
> much smarter when one says something Robbie likes. Need I say

more.

>
> We don't need to hear any more lies from you. I don't recall

naming

> James Woods as one of thos Hollywood bafoons who sit at the right
> hand of none other than fat boy Mikey Moore! I understand your

need

> to make things up when you've got no where to go. Please do it
> without getting caught time and again.

No, you used your normal generalizations. The point, that appears

to have gone right over your head, is that you SELECTIVELY decide who
to believe as it is convenient for you.

I've named those in Hollywood many times who are anti-American. He
was not one of them. Ever. He has never been a vocal fool like Sean
Penn or Pervert Rosie O'Donnell.

Clearly, James Wood knows

nothing about VP machines and how they operate. This whole

discussion is ridiculous since NV regs require the machines to be
random with no secondary decisions.

There we have it again! A fact of evidence is posted with the words
of a famous person saying he spoke directly to the casino horses, and
you choose to disallow it for reasons of what--because it simply does
not fit into your fantasy and sick world of gambling. Next.

>
> > > You asked for more on the cold/hot cycles being programmed

into

> the
> > > game, here's more of it served up to you! Whatcha gonna say
now,
> > > little dicky..... No sniveling.
>
> > More mythical nonsense. It appears you're claiming an actor is
now
> > the end all of VP knowledge. Where will it end? Funny, but

those

of
> > us who play almost every day haven't noticed any changes.
>
> No, he's but yet another respected personality who tells the

truth about what he hears and sees.

Trying to put yourself and James Wood in the same category is

another example of defective white matter. He is a respected actor,
you are a LAF and a con man.

So now you're saying he's respected, before he "knows nothing about
vp". What's next....a new way to cook the egg on your face--one that
you can't even save anymore?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > You mean like the Advantage Player who won the car at
> > Terrible's worth $21k and lost $28k piling up the drawing
tickets?
> You mean like the famous guru who won the car at the Palms worth
$24k
> > > but lost $38k piling up the drawing tickets?
>
> > A few will fall for your lies, the vast majority can see that
> common sense requires them to avoid Rob Singer like the plague.
>
> I think I'll leave that up there just to bother you with the

truth some more.

Works for me.

Me too. bothering you with truth is my specialty.

> >
> > > the only reason you don't is because
> > > you try to block it out since it would turn your fantasy

world

> > upside down to accept the truth about it.
> >
> > I don't need to block out anything. The facts have way of
pointing
> > out the truth. Robbie constantly uses terms like "voodoo
> math", "math
> > nonsense", "math theory", etc in order to claim that math

somehow

> > doesn't apply to VP while it applies to everything else in the
> > universe. That is what is called "block(ing) out" "the truth".
>
> Here we talk about a specific event, and little dicky, coming

apart

> at the seams, shuffles it into generalizations because he just
can't dispute the facts I reported.

You didn't report a fact. For all we know it is a complete
fabrication made up to support your con.

I don't gain a penny. However, facts that suppress & distress you are
another fact. It tears your fantasy world apart i know....poor little
dicky. So lost and so alone.....

However, anyone who gambles

knows that specific events are meaningless. Does the fact that you
don't hit a RF after being dealt 4 have any bearing on the next

time

you have a chance? Of course not. You can't even come up with a
reasonable argument to support your BS.

I think losing one's behind just to win a stupid car worth far less
speaks for itself. You'd spin this pictures as the 'AP' having won a
ton somewhere else just so you'd feel good about the clobber. All you
can come up with is that it was a 'good play' for more of those
famous phantom bucks. Think any sane person buys that baloney???

> THAT's what's called blocking out
> reality and truth--which your kind is so in need of doing.

No, it is called sticking to "reality and truth".

> > > > > The 'more than break even' story is the exception not the
> rule,
> > > >
> > > > Lie. I suppose my $3488 winning in promotions in 2003 was
just
> > > > another exception? How about $1764 in 2004 and $2835 in

2005?

> > More
> > > > exceptions? All this while still WINNING on the gambling
side.
> > You
> > > > see promotions are just the icing on the cake. Your lies

are

so
> > > easy to refute it's amazing that you would post them.
> > >
> > > Yup–just like your hero's claims!!
> >
> > Yes, the facts, once again …
>
> Then prove them!! What's the matter, can't do it???

I have the 1099s. Want to make a bet?

Are 1099's supposed to tell me how much you lost playing the sucker
as you chased those things? You got clear facts on it, lay 'em out.
Or just more phantom bucks to go along with the worthless papers??
Here's a flash to remember: Casinos will gladly hand out prizes to
people who consistently pay more for them than they're worth. Any
word of wisdom to add, or more of the "It's not me who loses--or any
AP's--it's the OTHER guys!--they pay for everything"

> >
> > > You're all the same but for
> > > different reasons. They do it for perception and reputation
just
> so sales to the innocent won't lag.
> >
> > Lie, you are so jealous it drips off of you again. Your

failures make that defective brain think it's OK to lie about them.
Sorry, but those of us with normal brains would rather deal with
facts.

>
> Kinda stings when it first hits, doesn't it. That's how the trith
> feels when you're trying to ignore it.

Is that how it feels, I guess you're the only one who would know.

And that's gotta hurt too: Weakness in the face of superior strength
and ability. You're beginning to be a poster boy for the meaning of
punishment.

> Especially, since
> > this is another one of your fabrications, made up only because
you
> > have no other choice. I have no reason to lie. Your house of
cards
> is tumbling down around you little Robbie.
>
> You have every reason to lie. In fact, you lie so much your

stories are like run-on sentences.

I have no reason to lie, never have, never will.

Did I mention dicky the denyer?

Of course, your

defective brain has to invent something to protect "the con", so

you

come up with this ridiculous nonsense about "belonging". Of course,
there is nothing to "belong" to, which makes this little invention

of

yours as obvious as can be. You'd think you could come up with a
better lie than this. You've had so much practice.

Ahhh....I see how much the 'belonging' issue has grabbed at your
emotions. Tough sleeping at night, hey? I'll bet right now you're in
agony and sweating over it profusely. But learn to live with it. You
made that bed.

> > > > > That's because there IS no positive side to addiction.
> > > >
> > > > No, it's because you'll lie at any time to further your con.
> > >
> > > No, it's because there IS no positive side to addiction!

You're continued denial in the face of overwhelming sense confirms

that forever.
> >
> > Same old Rob, when confronted with the truth he always starts
> telling lies. Naturally, he isn't that smart so the only thing

his defective brain can come up with is his own addiction problems.

Very, very sad.
>
> As is typical, little dicky can't handle the truth, so he wanders
as far away from it as his nervous little pea brain will allow. But

I will always be there to put him back on course!

Of course you will, little Robbie. And, of course it will be more
lies and lies. It's the only thing your defective brain can do.

Of course little dicky.....Keep telling yourself and repeat after me:
Addiction is a POSITIVE Thing!!

> > > > > What else could you possibly say being that you're one of
> > > The only problem is, these sheep are BLIND!
> >
> > No, we can all verify the math, the gambling regs, and use

common

> > sense. Only the BLIND would follow little Robbies' con.
>
> You select which part of the math to use and when,

Nope, I use the math required to analyze VP. You know, ASMD.

> which regs to
> selectively interpret and how,

You mean those NV gaming regs where I posted the reference for

anyone

to read and interpret? Could you please try to lie a little less
obviously?

> and when to close your eyes to the
> truth. If you were a cartoon character you'd do a lot better.

Eyes wild open and presenting the facts ... for all to see.

It's certainly wild allright. I'm the calming factor. That's how the
truth works.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > "The researchers drew up a list of criteria for lying,
cheating and deceiving, including habits such as conning people or
behaving
> > > > manipulatively, and telling lies in order to obtain

sickness

> > > > benefits."
> > >
> > > I think this pretty much describes our little Robbie.
> >
> > Thank you for reading the entire post first and answering the
only way any self-incriminating BS'er could save face.
>
> Lie, I didn't read it first, but what difference would it have

made.

Did I mention dicky the denyer?

All the time. ALways when stuck for a reasonable response.

> It still describes you to a tee.

The fact that you've obviously been scrambling arount the Internet

to

put your hate of me into words

Just a bit ago you stated I care about you, now it's hate. Can't you
get your lies consistent? However, I found another website that
describes your behavior.

http://www.aethyrea.com/psycho.html

shows a lack of self-confidence and an
obvious making-up of your fantasy about me. It also shows a no-

breain

at work! What's funny is I turned the tide on you...again. You've
printed your own personality without even realizing it!

Not even a good try. Give it your best next time.

>
> >
> > > > Since you pride yourself on the manipulation of the missus
into
> > > going to casinos with you while tricking her into making
believe
> > there's nothing wrong with being addicted, YOU'RE apparently

the

> > victim of your own CON!
> > >
> > > Another attempt at manipulation by stating a LIE as if it

were

a
> > > fact. This fits the description of a "habitual liar"

perfectly.

> > > Thanks Rob for showing your true colors so quickly.
> >
> > Show us the 'lie'!
>
> The whole statement. Especially, since I've told you more than

once

> that my wife is the real gambler of the family.

Yes we know....blame her for your problems.

Another poor try. It's easy to see that I don't blame anyone for non-
existent problems. You're slipping up, little man. I guess you've
been lying for so long that you think these obvious and idiotic
claims will rescue you.

> > It is a solid fact that you've ruined your poor
> > wife's life with your own degenerate addiction. Whatever color
that
> > is - and it's probably yellow - you wear it well.
>
> Lie, and much more evidence that I could have have wished for.

The

> truth is that these "habitual liars" will manufacture stories to
> support their lies. The facts are all there, little man.

All you're doing is confirming your involvement with a despicable
application of your gambling problem.

No, you're confirming to anyone reading this forum that you
constantly lie. That has always been my point. You lie about your
system being able to overcome mathematical fact and it goes downhill
from there.

I really don't know if there is
a lower form of human--at least on THIS planet.

I pretty good self-description. You've done this many times before.
Now we understand that your brain is somewhat wired to lie and ignore
the obvious fallacies. However, that will NEVER be a good excuse. Go
seek professional help.

> > > The con continues. By the way, I saw this interview several
> months
> > > ago and laughed out loud.
> >
> > Sorry to say it was not on TV. Were you there in person?

HAHAHA!!

>
> It was on TV. I believe it was on a golf telecast where he was
> involved in a pro-am. They had an interview with James Wood about
his gambling which was strange to say the least.

Read my lips again: IT was not on TV. Some other on-the-fly
discussion about it is where you're caught with your pants down
again. Selective interpretation--ever heard of it??

Lie. Of course, neither one of can prove it and it really makes
little difference.

>
> >
> > >I suspect he hit one of those cold streaks that every gambler
has
> on
> > occasion (I had one last fall). However, I know better and

guess

> > what? The streak ended, the winning returned and no chips were
> > changed.
> >
> > Funny, his losing wasn't even a topic of discussion. Are you a
bit more comfy now that you changed the subject once again?
>
> "... noticed after 9/11 that the video poker machines just

weren't

> streaking" is what you stated. Then you mentioned, "defer" the
> streaks. I took this to mean losing. In any event, nothing has
> changed since 9/11.

James Woods says it has and little dicky says it hasn't.
Hmmmm....Whom do we believe???

The Nevada Gaming Regulations.

Of course you selectively
interpreted the message however you wanted. that's you in a

nutshell.

You have no way to face reality so you use this concept constantly.
Only problem is, it craps on you every time thanks to me.

No, it makes you look foolish. I've already stated many times that
people blame their loses on all sorts of ridiculous things which net
out to secondary programming (remember the mythical switch). This is
nothing more than another silly claim that does not hold water.

> > > > You asked for more on the cold/hot cycles being programmed
into
> > the
> > > > game, here's more of it served up to you! Whatcha gonna say
> now,
> > > > little dicky..... No sniveling.
> >
> > > More mythical nonsense. It appears you're claiming an actor

is

> now
> > > the end all of VP knowledge. Where will it end? Funny, but
those
> of
> > > us who play almost every day haven't noticed any changes.
> >
> > No, he's but yet another respected personality who tells the
truth about what he hears and sees.
>
> Trying to put yourself and James Wood in the same category is
another example of defective white matter. He is a respected actor,
you are a LAF and a con man.

So now you're saying he's respected, before he "knows nothing about
vp".

A respected actor who knows nothing about how VP machines works. Yes,
I think that is a good description. Your problem? Do you thinking
acting somehow makes individuals experts in every field? LMAO.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > You mean like the Advantage Player who won the car at
> > > Terrible's worth $21k and lost $28k piling up the drawing
> tickets?
> > You mean like the famous guru who won the car at the Palms

worth

> $24k
> > > > but lost $38k piling up the drawing tickets?
> >
> > > A few will fall for your lies, the vast majority can see that
> > common sense requires them to avoid Rob Singer like the plague.
> >
> > I think I'll leave that up there just to bother you with the
truth some more.
>
> Works for me.

Me too. bothering you with truth is my specialty.

Lie.

>
> > >
> > > > the only reason you don't is because
> > > > you try to block it out since it would turn your fantasy
world
> > > upside down to accept the truth about it.
> > >
> > > I don't need to block out anything. The facts have way of
> pointing
> > > out the truth. Robbie constantly uses terms like "voodoo
> > math", "math
> > > nonsense", "math theory", etc in order to claim that math
somehow
> > > doesn't apply to VP while it applies to everything else in

the

> > > universe. That is what is called "block(ing) out" "the truth".
> >
> > Here we talk about a specific event, and little dicky, coming
apart
> > at the seams, shuffles it into generalizations because he just
> can't dispute the facts I reported.

> You didn't report a fact. For all we know it is a complete
> fabrication made up to support your con.

I don't gain a penny. However, facts that suppress & distress you

are

another fact. It tears your fantasy world apart i know....poor

little

dicky. So lost and so alone.....

Lie. We already know the reasons for your con. I've explained them
several times. And, now the articles I've referenced support how
psychos like yourself will do anything to be accepted as knowedgeable
in whatever field they aspire to. In your case, you wanted to be an
APer and a guru. You failed on both accounts and now you will say and
do anything to appease your wounded ego.

However, anyone who gambles
> knows that specific events are meaningless. Does the fact that

you

> don't hit a RF after being dealt 4 have any bearing on the next
time
> you have a chance? Of course not. You can't even come up with a
> reasonable argument to support your BS.

I think losing one's behind just to win a stupid car worth far less
speaks for itself.

No. Since you've provided absolutely no evidence to support this
tale, I think I'll just file it away as another one of your lies.

You'd spin this pictures as the 'AP' having won a
ton somewhere else just so you'd feel good about the clobber.

It's doubtful they lost. With nothing other than your history of
lying to make us believe you, what do you expect?

All you
can come up with is that it was a 'good play' for more of those
famous phantom bucks. Think any sane person buys that baloney???

All of the sane people can spot your lies a mile away. The "baloney"
is in your tall tale.

>
> > THAT's what's called blocking out
> > reality and truth--which your kind is so in need of doing.

No, that is your self-analysis, and a good one at that.

>
> No, it is called sticking to "reality and truth".
>
> > > > > > The 'more than break even' story is the exception not

the

> > rule,
> > > > >
> > > > > Lie. I suppose my $3488 winning in promotions in 2003 was
> just
> > > > > another exception? How about $1764 in 2004 and $2835 in
2005?
> > > More
> > > > > exceptions? All this while still WINNING on the gambling
> side.
> > > You
> > > > > see promotions are just the icing on the cake. Your lies
are
> so
> > > > easy to refute it's amazing that you would post them.
> > > >
> > > > Yup–just like your hero's claims!!
> > >
> > > Yes, the facts, once again …
> >
> > Then prove them!! What's the matter, can't do it???
>
> I have the 1099s. Want to make a bet?

Are 1099's supposed to tell me how much you lost playing the sucker
as you chased those things?

Would you like to see my 1040 too? You know that thing I file to the
federal gov't which includes my gambling winnings. Make the bet big
enough and it's all there for you to see. I suppose little Robbie
will claim that I pay extra taxes for no reason. LMAO.

You got clear facts on it, lay 'em out.
Or just more phantom bucks to go along with the worthless papers??
Here's a flash to remember: Casinos will gladly hand out prizes to
people who consistently pay more for them than they're worth. Any
word of wisdom to add, or more of the "It's not me who loses--or

any

AP's--it's the OTHER guys!--they pay for everything"

That's right. The 99+% non-APers. Haven't you learned anything yet?
Oh, that's right, you've got your con to protect.

>
> > >
> > > > You're all the same but for
> > > > different reasons. They do it for perception and reputation
> just
> > so sales to the innocent won't lag.
> > >
> > > Lie, you are so jealous it drips off of you again. Your
failures make that defective brain think it's OK to lie about them.
Sorry, but those of us with normal brains would rather deal with
facts.
> >
> > Kinda stings when it first hits, doesn't it. That's how the

trith

> > feels when you're trying to ignore it.
>
> Is that how it feels, I guess you're the only one who would know.

And that's gotta hurt too: Weakness in the face of superior

strength

and ability. You're beginning to be a poster boy for the meaning of
punishment.

LMAO. Got you again. Hey psycho, even with your brain wired to come
up with fantasies and lies you can't keep up. What can I say,
superior intellect is Robbies' demise.

>
> > Especially, since
> > > this is another one of your fabrications, made up only

because

> you
> > > have no other choice. I have no reason to lie. Your house of
> cards
> > is tumbling down around you little Robbie.
> >
> > You have every reason to lie. In fact, you lie so much your
stories are like run-on sentences.
>
> I have no reason to lie, never have, never will.

Did I mention dicky the denyer?

Of course you did, it's your standard response when you have nothing
to say.

Of course, your
> defective brain has to invent something to protect "the con", so
you
> come up with this ridiculous nonsense about "belonging". Of

course,

> there is nothing to "belong" to, which makes this little

invention

of
> yours as obvious as can be. You'd think you could come up with a
> better lie than this. You've had so much practice.

Ahhh....I see how much the 'belonging' issue has grabbed at your
emotions.

Da plan, da plane.

Tough sleeping at night, hey?

Nope, slept like a baby. Exposing your lies has an calming effect on
me. Tell us about your night, psycho ...

I'll bet right now you're in
agony and sweating over it profusely. But learn to live with it.

Is that the best you have? Come on, use that extra white matter to
come up with something reasonably clever.

You made that bed.

Not yet, but I'll do that as soon as I'm done here.

> > > > > > What else could you possibly say being that you're one

of

> > > > The only problem is, these sheep are BLIND!
> > >
> > > No, we can all verify the math, the gambling regs, and use
common
> > > sense. Only the BLIND would follow little Robbies' con.
> >
> > You select which part of the math to use and when,
>
> Nope, I use the math required to analyze VP. You know, ASMD.

Was this too confusing for your defective brain? Maybe it's that
acronym, ASMD. Let me spell it out for you ... Addition ...
Subtraction ... Multiplication ... Division. That is all the math
needed to determine the EV of any game. So, tell us, psycho, what
is "selective" about using simple math?

>
> > which regs to
> > selectively interpret and how,
>
> You mean those NV gaming regs where I posted the reference for
anyone
> to read and interpret? Could you please try to lie a little less
> obviously?

What, no attempted lie to save face? Robbie, the psycho, is losing
this battle bigtime.

>
> > and when to close your eyes to the
> > truth. If you were a cartoon character you'd do a lot better.
>
> Eyes wild open and presenting the facts ... for all to see.

It's certainly wild allright. I'm the calming factor. That's how

the

truth works.

LMAO. Robbie can't even come up with a good lie.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
>
> > > > > "The researchers drew up a list of criteria for lying,
> cheating and deceiving, including habits such as conning people

or

> behaving
> > > > > manipulatively, and telling lies in order to obtain
sickness
> > > > > benefits."
> > > >
> > > > I think this pretty much describes our little Robbie.
> > >
> > > Thank you for reading the entire post first and answering the
> only way any self-incriminating BS'er could save face.
> >
> > Lie, I didn't read it first, but what difference would it have
made.
>
> Did I mention dicky the denyer?

All the time. ALways when stuck for a reasonable response.

And ALWAYS after, why what's this, a DENIAL of the truth!
  

> > It still describes you to a tee.
>
> The fact that you've obviously been scrambling around the

Internet to put your hate of me into words

Just a bit ago you stated I care about you, now it's hate. Can't

you get your lies consistent? However, I found another website that

describes your behavior.

Ever hear 'loves to hate to love' me? That's you to that tee you're
talking about. It's pretty similar to 'can't live with him/can't live
without him' syndrome. You just don't know where to go sometimes, and
I LOVE IT.

http://www.aethyrea.com/psycho.html

You do the work, then you explain. All I can see from your efforts is
I must be really administering some spanking for you to do all these
searches. Hot time in the city!

> shows a lack of self-confidence and an
> obvious making-up of your fantasy about me. It also shows a no-
breain
> at work! What's funny is I turned the tide on you...again. You've
> printed your own personality without even realizing it!

Not even a good try. Give it your best next time.

And you've shown how you're your own worst enemy....again....to boot!

Since you pride yourself on the manipulation of the missus
> into going to casinos with you while tricking her into making
> believe there's nothing wrong with being addicted, YOU'RE

apparently the victim of your own CON!

> > > >
> > > > Another attempt at manipulation by stating a LIE as if it
were a fact. This fits the description of a "habitual liar"
perfectly. Thanks Rob for showing your true colors so quickly.
> > >
> > > Show us the 'lie'!
> >
> > The whole statement. Especially, since I've told you more than
once that my wife is the real gambler of the family.
>
> Yes we know....blame her for your problems.

Another poor try. It's easy to see that I don't blame anyone for

non-

existent problems. You're slipping up, little man. I guess you've
been lying for so long that you think these obvious and idiotic
claims will rescue you.

So just how easy is it??? Huh??? Portraying her as a weak-minded
individual won't score you any points on either side of the board,
dont'cha know mate! And denying what ails you is too self-
incriminating. It's also embarrassing for me to sit here and watch
you humiliate yourself.

> > > It is a solid fact that you've ruined your poor
> > > wife's life with your own degenerate addiction. Whatever

color that is - and it's probably yellow - you wear it well.

> >
> > Lie, and much more evidence that I could have have wished for.
The truth is that these "habitual liars" will manufacture stories

to support their lies. The facts are all there, little man.

>
> All you're doing is confirming your involvement with a despicable
> application of your gambling problem.

No, you're confirming to anyone reading this forum that you
constantly lie. That has always been my point. You lie about your
system being able to overcome mathematical fact and it goes

downhill from there.

Call it what you may. Only you know the ruin within......

> I really don't know if there is a lower form of human--at least

on THIS planet.

I pretty good self-description. You've done this many times before.
Now we understand that your brain is somewhat wired to lie and

ignore the obvious fallacies. However, that will NEVER be a good
excuse. Go seek professional help.

And squirm around in plain site as you wish. It ain't gonna go away
until you face up to it like a nerd-man.

> > > Sorry to say it was not on TV. Were you there in person?
HAHAHA!!
> >
> > It was on TV. I believe it was on a golf telecast where he was
> > involved in a pro-am. They had an interview with James Wood

about

> his gambling which was strange to say the least.
>
> Read my lips again: IT was not on TV. Some other on-the-fly
> discussion about it is where you're caught with your pants down
> again. Selective interpretation--ever heard of it??

Lie. Of course, neither one of can prove it and it really makes
little difference.

Now you're getting it--makes little difference---to someone who'll
never alter their habit no matter what. Those of us with open minds
see Woods' statements as sensible deductions after discussions with
knowledgeable people--you know, those same casino employees you
basically live with.

> > > >I suspect he hit one of those cold streaks that every

gambler has

Funny, his losing wasn't even a topic of discussion. Are you a
> bit more comfy now that you changed the subject once again?
> >
> > "... noticed after 9/11 that the video poker machines just
weren't
> > streaking" is what you stated. Then you mentioned, "defer" the
> > streaks. I took this to mean losing. In any event, nothing has
> > changed since 9/11.
>
> James Woods says it has and little dicky says it hasn't.
> Hmmmm....Whom do we believe???

The Nevada Gaming Regulations.

....as explained to by inside people and given permission to be put
in print by James Woods. Try harder next time.

> Of course you selectively
> interpreted the message however you wanted. that's you in a
nutshell. You have no way to face reality so you use this concept

constantly. Only problem is, it craps on you every time thanks to me.

No, it makes you look foolish. I've already stated many times that
people blame their loses on all sorts of ridiculous things which

net out to secondary programming (remember the mythical switch). This
is nothing more than another silly claim that does not hold water.

You asked for more on the cold/hot cycles being programmed
into the game, here's more of it served up to you! Whatcha gonna say
now, little dicky..... No sniveling.
And it wasn't just something said in passing--it had meat to it. Read
it again and tell us it's just some excuse about losing.

> > > > More mythical nonsense. It appears you're claiming an actor
is now the end all of VP knowledge. Where will it end? Funny, but
those of us who play almost every day haven't noticed any changes.
> > >
> > > No, he's but yet another respected personality who tells the
> truth about what he hears and sees.
> >
> > Trying to put yourself and James Wood in the same category is
> another example of defective white matter. He is a respected

actor, you are a LAF and a con man.

> So now you're saying he's respected, before he "knows nothing

about vp".

A respected actor who knows nothing about how VP machines works.

Yes, I think that is a good description. Your problem? Do you
thinking acting somehow makes individuals experts in every field?
LMAO.

You're problem us you choose what to hear or read and disgard the
rest, no matter who the personality is. He was under no pressure and
had no reason to say good or bad things about vp, and I doubt very
much if he did lose, it hurt him. He was just calling a spade a
spase, the same as I do every day here but it invokes terror within
your vp-consumed body that has a difficult time finding its way out.
Thus, the unending flow of denial and illogic.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > You mean like the Advantage Player who won the car at
> > > > Terrible's worth $21k and lost $28k piling up the drawing
> > tickets?
> > > You mean like the famous guru who won the car at the Palms
worth $24k but lost $38k piling up the drawing tickets?
> > >
> > > > A few will fall for your lies, the vast majority can see

that common sense requires them to avoid Rob Singer like the plague.

> > >
> > > I think I'll leave that up there just to bother you with the
> truth some more.
> >
> > Works for me.
>
> Me too. bothering you with truth is my specialty.

Lie.

Truth, with the added bonus of enjoyment.

> > > > > the only reason you don't is because
> > > > > you try to block it out since it would turn your fantasy
> world upside down to accept the truth about it.
> > > >
> > > > I don't need to block out anything. The facts have way of
> > pointing
> > > > out the truth. Robbie constantly uses terms like "voodoo
> > > math", "math
> > > > nonsense", "math theory", etc in order to claim that math
> somehow
> > > > doesn't apply to VP while it applies to everything else in
the
> > > > universe. That is what is called "block(ing) out" "the

truth".

> > >
> > > Here we talk about a specific event, and little dicky, coming
> apart at the seams, shuffles it into generalizations because he

just can't dispute the facts I reported.

>
> > You didn't report a fact. For all we know it is a complete
> > fabrication made up to support your con.
>
> I don't gain a penny. However, facts that suppress & distress you
are another fact. It tears your fantasy world apart I know....poor
little dicky. So lost and so alone.....

Lie. We already know the reasons for your con. I've explained them
several times. And, now the articles I've referenced support how
psychos like yourself will do anything to be accepted as

knowedgeable in whatever field they aspire to. In your case, you
wanted to be an APer and a guru. You failed on both accounts and now
you will say and do anything to appease your wounded ego.

By definition I'm an expert in vp. That's not even an issue. Anyone
can see it except those in extreme denial, you know, like YOU! As
for 'guru' I suppose I am to many people and i can live with that.
But your big issue is in your being bypassed and not 'belonging' to
someclique you think is important to bundles of gamblers. You're a
make-believe artist, and in your twisted little world you are a guru
with an important program and many people adore you.

>
> However, anyone who gambles
> > knows that specific events are meaningless. Does the fact that
you
> > don't hit a RF after being dealt 4 have any bearing on the next
> time
> > you have a chance? Of course not. You can't even come up with a
> > reasonable argument to support your BS.
>
> I think losing one's behind just to win a stupid car worth far

less, speaks for itself.

No. Since you've provided absolutely no evidence to support this
tale, I think I'll just file it away as another one of your lies.

Listen up....Now's the time to turn on that computer attached to your
neck, you know, the one that guides us throughout our lives with
direction based on experience and reality. See if you can't tune into
the truth I just told. Give it a few days to warm up if needed.

> You'd spin this pictures as the 'AP' having won a
> ton somewhere else just so you'd feel good about the clobber.

It's doubtful they lost. With nothing other than your history of
lying to make us believe you, what do you expect?

OK, I see. It's perfectly fine to portray the AP's as promotion
winners, likely winners everywhere else they play, and able to leap
tall building with a single bounce. Hmmm.... I wonder who it is that
hypnotizes the casino managers into letting them do that! I can see
it now as they all chime in together: "The rest of the chumps can
lose--that's no problem. Just let these compulsive addicts win and
it'll all be OK. We know they're feared everywhere they go, but just
ignore them. Our bonuses won't be quite as high, but they deserve it
for their prowess!" And end it with: La dee da dee da da da!!

> All you
> can come up with is that it was a 'good play' for more of those
> famous phantom bucks. Think any sane person buys that baloney???

All of the sane people can spot your lies a mile away.The "baloney"

is in your tall tale.

So what'cha denying this time?

> > > THAT's what's called blocking out
> > > reality and truth--which your kind is so in need of doing.

No, that is your self-analysis, and a good one at that.

As it relates to the fantasyland in which your mind resides.....

> > > > Yes, the facts, once again …
> > >
> > > Then prove them!! What's the matter, can't do it???
> >
> > I have the 1099s. Want to make a bet?
>
> Are 1099's supposed to tell me how much you lost playing the

sucker as you chased those things?

Would you like to see my 1040 too? You know that thing I file to

the

federal gov't which includes my gambling winnings. Make the bet big
enough and it's all there for you to see. I suppose little Robbie
will claim that I pay extra taxes for no reason. LMAO.

You're a little late on that one little dicky. That's been put to me
by almost every famous name and a handful of geeks just like you. As
soon as I accept then each bozo came back, like you did with the $100
printer on my documents challenge, and said "but gee Rob, you could
easily have filed one that showed your true situation of losses for
the year and will write up another false one right now to show us".
Now I know you're sweating thru this because this is what you were
intending to do, but there's more. When I said I'd let any or all of
them in on a conference call to the IRS to verify my records (if the
IRS would do that) they immediately said it wasn't allowed. Then when
I offerred to show my AUDIT records, that was dissed off as too easy
to generate on a computer. So just as with everything video poker,
you're a day late and ANOTHER dollar short.

> You got clear facts on it, lay 'em out.
> Or just more phantom bucks to go along with the worthless

papers?? Here's a flash to remember: Casinos will gladly hand out
prizes to people who consistently pay more for them than they're
worth. Any word of wisdom to add, or more of the "It's not me who
loses--or any AP's--it's the OTHER guys!--they pay for everything"

That's right. The 99+% non-APers. Haven't you learned anything yet?
Oh, that's right, you've got your con to protect.

Yup--just as I said, blame the other guy--just as you blame your poor
wife! But let's discuss this 'con' you use as a crutch. Never before
has anyone been called this when it affects so few people...and
people with a common serious illness at that. It seems not many more
than you and a few others are bruised by what I say. How about if i
send over the iodine with a few bandaids and maybe the bleeding will
stop!

You're all the same but for different reasons. They do it for

perception and reputation just so sales to the innocent won't lag.

> > > >
> > > > Lie, you are so jealous it drips off of you again. Your
> failures make that defective brain think it's OK to lie about

them. Sorry, but those of us with normal brains would rather deal
with facts.

> > >
> > > Kinda stings when it first hits, doesn't it. That's how the
truth feels when you're trying to ignore it.
> >
> > Is that how it feels, I guess you're the only one who would

know.

>
> And that's gotta hurt too: Weakness in the face of superior
strength and ability. You're beginning to be a poster boy for the

meaning of punishment.

LMAO. Got you again. Hey psycho, even with your brain wired to come
up with fantasies and lies you can't keep up. What can I say,
superior intellect is Robbies' demise.

In fact, read my statement above once again. Therein you will see the
genius behind the theme of my first book. It isn't gaming's most
popular book for nothing!

> > > Especially, since
> > > > this is another one of your fabrications, made up only
because you have no other choice. I have no reason to lie. Your

house of cards is tumbling down around you little Robbie.

> > >
> > > You have every reason to lie. In fact, you lie so much your
> stories are like run-on sentences.
> >
> > I have no reason to lie, never have, never will.
>
> Did I mention dicky the denyer?

Of course you did, it's your standard response when you have

nothing to say.

To you, lying is a necessity. You must run into sensible people now
and then, so you must lie to feel normal. It's written all over you.

> Of course, your
> > defective brain has to invent something to protect "the con",

so

> you
> > come up with this ridiculous nonsense about "belonging". Of
course,
> > there is nothing to "belong" to, which makes this little
invention
> of
> > yours as obvious as can be. You'd think you could come up with

a

> > better lie than this. You've had so much practice.
>
> Ahhh....I see how much the 'belonging' issue has grabbed at your
> emotions.

Da plan, da plane.

No: The PAIN. The PAIN.

> Tough sleeping at night, hey?

Nope, slept like a baby. Exposing your lies has an calming effect

on me. Tell us about your night, psycho ...

Denial again--I like it. You wear it well! Remember, the family that
duffers together 'lies' together.

> I'll bet right now you're in agony and sweating over it

profusely. But learn to live with it.

Is that the best you have? Come on, use that extra white matter to
come up with something reasonably clever.

> You made that bed.

Not yet, but I'll do that as soon as I'm done here.

Now you must sleep in it, as uncomfortable as it may be. Denial does
that to nerds.

> > > > > > > What else could you possibly say being that you're

one of

> > > > > The only problem is, these sheep are BLIND!
> > > >
> > > > No, we can all verify the math, the gambling regs, and use
> common
> > > > sense. Only the BLIND would follow little Robbies' con.
> > >
> > > You select which part of the math to use and when,
> >
> > Nope, I use the math required to analyze VP. You know, ASMD.

Was this too confusing for your defective brain? Maybe it's that
acronym, ASMD. Let me spell it out for you ... Addition ...
Subtraction ... Multiplication ... Division. That is all the math
needed to determine the EV of any game. So, tell us, psycho, what
is "selective" about using simple math?

I've got him mumbling now!!! Even to himself!

> > > which regs to selectively interpret and how,
> >
> > You mean those NV gaming regs where I posted the reference for
> anyone to read and interpret? Could you please try to lie a

little less obviously? What, no attempted lie to save face? Robbie,
the psycho, is losing this battle bigtime.

I remember that--when I forced you to do all that work for me! And
even then it splashed back into your face. You couldn't even do THAT
right! Your selective interpretations were easily dismantled by me
time and again. Please.....you're dealing with a master intelligence
here.

> > > and when to close your eyes to the
> > > truth. If you were a cartoon character you'd do a lot better.
> >
> > Eyes wild open and presenting the facts ... for all to see.
>
> It's certainly wild allright. I'm the calming factor. That's how
the truth works.

LMAO. Robbie can't even come up with a good lie.

Common trait among those who do not lie.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote: