All of these were on consectutive hands, correct? I thought that was
your initial question. If not, then you need to rephrase the question
and the question should be about having 3 (or more) RFs in a short
period of time (or knowing someone who did). For example, I know of a
woman who pretty much only played one machine last summer because she
had 8 RFs on it over a two week period. Another woman I talked to had
6 RFs on the same machine in a 5 day period.
Another example, I played a set of 3 machines over a 5 month period
and had ALL 7 of my RFs in that period on the same machine. I played
equally on all 3 machines. My wife, on the other hand, had more RFs
on the other two machines.
I once sat down at a machine, after moving ;), and hit a RF. The
person who paid me off and those sitting at nearby machines indicated
it was the 3rd one on that machine in a couple of hours. All by
different individuals.
Finally, a slot tech (bad example I know) once told me about an
individual who had 4 RFs on the same machine. He indicated it was the
most ever reported. I'd take this one with a grain of salt.
Well, almost finally. I often play on a bank of NSUD triple play
progressives. When the progressives get high you can't find a seat so
no one moves. One day I was talking to someone who was playing and
they indicated they had hit deuces every way possible over a 5-6 hour
session.
Of course this entire discussion assumes that RFs are your only goal.
If your goal is to determine whether to switch machines after a big
jackpot then you need to analyze ALL results obtained by changing
machines and compare them with all results obtained by staying on the
same machine.
Dick
> Have you ever heard of someone hitting back-back royals and then
> switching machines and hitting a third royal? If not, using your
> logic below, then one should stay on the same machine.
-----------------
At least twice already. (1) This guy playing next to me just hit
the Royal playing Deuces on a Multi-Game machine, switch to DB and
hit the Royal again, moved to the next machine and hit the Royal
again. (2) A few months later on the same bank of $1 MultiGame
machines, an old lady hit the Royal on DW, switch to the next
machine to the right and hit the Royal again, switch again to the
next machine to her right and hit the Royal again. (at Pechanga
Indian casino)
>
> The problem is you're ignoring the fact (stated earlier) that all
VP
> hands are INDEPENDENT events. You can't make ANY assumptions
about
> the future from past events when the events are independent. I
get
> the feeling you are somewhat unwilling to accept that each hand
is
> truly independent.
>
> Dick
-------------
Actually, I did not ignore the fact that you are talking about. All
I'm saying is that since nobody has admitted of experiencing or
witnessing back-to-back-to-back Royals on the same machine (Single
Play), same session and the same game (excluding machines set for
Tournament mode), I won't hesitate moving to another machine if I
happen to hit back-to-back Royals already on my machine. (As long
as
these Independent events have not resulted to a Post that says "I
hit 3 or 5 or 10 Royals on the same machine, same game, same
session
back-to-back-to-back.)
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "gilbert_616" <gilbert_616@y...>
wrote:
> > --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Part Timer" <PartTimeVP@h...>
wrote:
> > >
> > > >From: "gilbert_616" <gilbert_616@y...>
> > > > Many people don't like to play on machines
> > > >where the Jackpot was just been hit. (chance of hitting
back-
to-
> > back
> > > >jackpots is very slim, as you can read from the other
replies)
> > >
> > > This has nothing to do with why the casinos want you to play
off
> > the jackpot
> > > hands (or any hand that needs there attention, like coupon
quads
> or
> > > whatever). The casinos want you to play off the hand so that
you
> > or someone
> > > else won't attempt to get them to pay it again.
> > ---------------------------
> > You could be right but, I really doubt it 'coz from experience,
I
> > have left many times machines where I just hit 4-Aces with a
kicker
> > for $500 and even RF playing short coin (no W-2 or attendant to
> worry
> > about) and never heard of anybody attempting to get paid for
the
> same
> > hand. (at least in the casinos where I've played Palms,
Orleans,
> > Stardust, etc.)
> >
> >
> > >
> > > >And since most of the replies is showing that the most back-
to-
> > back-to-
> > > >back Royals people have hit before is "2", it seems to be a
very
> > wise
> > > >decision to move to another machine once you have
accomplished
> that
> > > >number "2".
> > >
> > > That's silly, the machine has exactly the same chance after
> hitting
> > #2 as it
> > > did after hitting no royals for 3 days. Each dealt hand is
> > independent.
> > > Otherwise we wouldn't hear any stories of back-to-back hands
at
> all.
> > >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > That's the main point why I ended up asking this question on
back-
> to-
> > back-to-back. Mathematically or RNGically you are right but,
> unless
> > you tell whether you've experienced or saw someone hitting the
> > jackpots on the same machine in the same session 3 or more
Royals,
> > then my choice would still to play on another machine after
hitting
> > at least 2 Royals on the same machine back-to-back. (And I'm
not
> > saying it can't be done. It just seems that it hasn't been
done.
> As
> > if asking someone to play the numbers 1-2-3-4-5-6 in Lotto as
some
> > Lottery books explain that noone has hit the jackpot with that
> > combination. I've seen it in Keno before but they draw 20
numbers
> > vs. the Lotto drawing 6 numbers as an example.)
> >
> >
> > Let us know if you can set a new record on back-to-back Royals
on
> the
> > same machine same session.
> >
> >
> > >
_________________________________________________________________
> > > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download
today -
> > it's FREE!
> > > http://messenger.msn.click-
url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "gilbert_616" <gilbert_616@y...> wrote:
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "mroejacks" <rgmustain@a...> wrote: