vpFREE2 Forums

What Will Happen To vpFREE

at the risk of being clobbered here, i think another point to be made is
that these downgraded paytables will be more significant to the 'full-time'
advantage player than to the part-time recreational player. the long term for me
is *years* beyond the long-term for jean scott. i don't mean to imply it
won't matter, but that it won't matter as much.

In a message dated 5/31/2007 11:04:21 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
going4broke2005@yahoo.com writes:

Will you all still be playing VP in a year, five years
or ten years from now?

I know I will still be going to Vegas because the mystique still draws
me in regardless if it is business or vacation. I hate the slow pace
of table games and slots downright bore me so I know I will continue to
play vp. I moan and groan when the pay tables are downgraded, try to
shift my strategy accordingly, but still keep on playing. As I read in
a book on vp somewhere, vp is my crack cocaine. I would like to think
I would play lower denomination machines if the paytables got too bad,
but somehow I felt very cheated the one time I hit a royal flush on a
nickle vp machine and only got $200, so for the time being quarter and
fifty cent machines it is for me.

Now if the free room offers suddenly stop, that is a whole new topic
that would make me think twice about the frequency in which I go to
Vegas...

************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

at the risk of being clobbered here, i think another point to be

made is

that these downgraded paytables will be more significant to

the 'full-time'

advantage player than to the part-time recreational player. the

long term for me

is *years* beyond the long-term for jean scott. i don't mean to

imply it

won't matter, but that it won't matter as much.

Makes sense to me

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, agonpd@... wrote:

<<the long term for me
is *years* beyond the long-term for jean scott>>

Geesh, maybe I better go out and buy a cemetery plot!!! :slight_smile: Except I am giving my body to science so I won't need one. However, my plan now is that when science finally gets my body, about the only thing left that's not too worn out to study will be wrinkles.

···

________________________________________
Jean $�ott
The new " FRUGAL VIDEO POKER
SCOUTING GUIDE" and other frugal
products are available at my Web site,
http://queenofcomps.com/.

Jean $cott wrote:

Geesh, maybe I better go out and buy a cemetery plot!!! :slight_smile: Except I am
giving my body to science so I won't need one. However, my plan now is that
when science finally gets my body, about the only thing left that's not too
worn out to study will be wrinkles.

Are you considering donating your body to Gunther von Hagens "Body
Worlds" shown at museums where they are displayed Plastinated? Maybe
propped up at a video Poker machine, full pay of course! :slight_smile:

Dennis
vp-connoisseur

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

agonpd wrote:

at the risk of being clobbered here, i think another point to be
made is that these downgraded paytables will be more significant to
the 'full-time' advantage player than to the part-time recreational
player. the long term for me is *years* beyond the long-term for
jean scott. i don't mean to imply it won't matter, but that it
won't matter as much.

Well, not intending to "clobber", but ...

Over 90% (and often 95%) of the return from most vp games is derived
from high frequency hands, where the "long term" is achieved within a
dozen sessions or so.

A cut to the payouts on those hands adversely impacts even the most
casual of players' pocketbook with certainty in very short order --
and that impact, hour to hour, is felt equally by all players, no
matter how often (or seldom) a particular player hits the machines.

- Harry (who plays optimally, in the "short run" :wink:

Nonsense, Jean. You still have many good years left. Thanks to the advances in gerontology and the promise of genetic engineering and stem cell research--if you can hang on for another 30-40 years you can probably achieve immortality!
   
  Rick

···

queenofcomps <queenofcomps@cox.net> wrote:
          <<the long term for me
is *years* beyond the long-term for jean scott>>

Geesh, maybe I better go out and buy a cemetery plot!!! :slight_smile: Except I am
giving my body to science so I won't need one. However, my plan now is that
when science finally gets my body, about the only thing left that's not too
worn out to study will be wrinkles.
________________________________________
Jean $¢ott
The new " FRUGAL VIDEO POKER
SCOUTING GUIDE" and other frugal
products are available at my Web site,
http://queenofcomps.com/.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]