TedChee wrote:
Was just thinking wouldn't it be interesting to have a challenge?
One of the major authors & RS in a playoff. To accommodate RS's
game-switching & hit & run style, both would play the same coin-in, switch denominations at
the same coin-in & quit at the same coin-in. Both would be free to play
whatever VP they wanted. Probably need a minimum coin-in per session & unbiased
auditors.Run it over 10 sessions in 10 casinos.
Loser pays winner 2X the difference in their final win/loss.
I'm sure that Singer would jump at this opportunity because Ted's proposed rules would put the computer-strategy player at a huge disadvantage. Being forced to follow Singer's denomination jumping tactics would mean playing on sub-100% games. Also, high variance games such as Singer's favorite Double Double Bonus are more likely to yield a win in a short session. Such a "challenge" would prove nothing. All it would accomplish is to give Singer more publicity no matter which way it happened to go. Please, let's just drop it.
Dan
P.S. to VPFree administrator: Normally I would post a response about Singer on FreeVPFree, as I did my last one, but I think everyone who read Ted's proposal should receive this.
ยทยทยท
--
Dan Paymar, author of "Video Poker - Optimum Play"
Editor and publisher of "Video Poker Times" newsletter
Visit my web site at www.OptimumPlay.com
"Chance favors the prepared mind"
- Louis Pasteur