vpFREE2 Forums

was Re: Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 4 JUN 2013

The problem with the DIAD program is that it's a bigger casino promotion than regular diamond, and that means advantage: casino. All the years I was a diamond player I played to the minimum requirements, then stepped away from Harrahs until the next fiscal year. If I remember correctly, DIAD also had some calendar shortcomings of some sort.

···

----- Reply message -----
From: "richard d" <cdgnpc@aol.com>
To: <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] was Re: Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 4 JUN 2013
Date: Sun, Jun 9, 2013 11:54 am
I had seen discussions here and elsewhere of DIAD. Problem is you see advice and it is not always apparent who is full of crap. Yes if there was a 100 play .25 9/6 JoB that would have been my first choice but I did not see it.

RS wrote:

The problem with the DIAD program is that it's a bigger casino promotion than regular diamond, and that means advantage: casino.

.
DIAD aside, this is a faulty premise. Most successful VP players thrive on promotions (excluding progressive chasers and 100% game players who are largely not eligible for promotions)

There are good and bad promotions --- large and small. Evaluating them is part of what it takes to be successful.

Some very big promos have been very lucrative. Assuming the contrary causes you to miss out on some profitable opportunities

Bob

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]