vpFREE2 Forums

VPFree2 Data base

#1

Not that I'm not appreciative of the efforts of VPFree2, but I found
the now defunct VPFree database to be a much better layout, easier to
read,and more informative. Maybe the VPFree2 people who are now in
charge of data updating could use the "old" format? Anyone share the
same view?
  
  Larry F.

#2

One thing they should add is the database blog that the old database
had where it showed the recent updates to the database.

Not that I'm not appreciative of the efforts of VPFree2, but I found
the now defunct VPFree database to be a much better layout, easier to
read,and more informative. Maybe the VPFree2 people who are now in
charge of data updating could use the "old" format? Anyone share

the

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lfcmja2000" <lfcmja@...> wrote:

same view?
  
  Larry F.

#3

I agree. The reason that they separated all the stuff from the old
format is to be able to sort through the data base, but I really do
not care about searching through the data base.

I would also like the casino data to take a larger portion of the page.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lfcmja2000" <lfcmja@...> wrote:

Not that I'm not appreciative of the efforts of VPFree2, but I found
the now defunct VPFree database to be a much better layout, easier to
read,and more informative. Maybe the VPFree2 people who are now in
charge of data updating could use the "old" format? Anyone share the
same view?
  
  Larry F.

#4

I, also, find the old format much more appealing and easier on the eyes.

···

To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
From: lfcmja@aol.com
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:08:26 +0000
Subject: [vpFREE] VPFree2 Data base

Not that I'm not appreciative of the efforts of VPFree2, but I found
the now defunct VPFree database to be a much better layout, easier to
read,and more informative. Maybe the VPFree2 people who are now in
charge of data updating could use the "old" format? Anyone share the
same view?
  
  Larry F.

------------------------------------

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Links

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: Discover 10 secrets about the new Windows Live.
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550F681DAD532637!7540.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_ugc_post_022009

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#5

I'll third that suggestion/plea.

Bobfpdw

···

--- On Fri, 2/27/09, kelso 1600 <kelso1600@hotmail.com> wrote:

From: kelso 1600 <kelso1600@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: [vpFREE] VPFree2 Data base
To: vpfree@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, February 27, 2009, 7:19 PM
I, also, find the old format much more appealing and easier
on the eyes.

> To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
> From: lfcmja@aol.com
> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:08:26 +0000
> Subject: [vpFREE] VPFree2 Data base
>
> Not that I'm not appreciative of the efforts of
VPFree2, but I found
> the now defunct VPFree database to be a much better
layout, easier to
> read,and more informative. Maybe the VPFree2 people
who are now in
> charge of data updating could use the "old"
format? Anyone share the
> same view?
>
> Larry F.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: Discover 10 secrets about the new Windows
Live.
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550F681DAD532637!7540.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_ugc_post_022009

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Links

#6

Another vote to please bring back the database blog (or keep the old
one current). Thanks.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "makin4vegas" <makin4vegas@...> wrote:

One thing they should add is the database blog that the old database
had where it showed the recent updates to the database.

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lfcmja2000" <lfcmja@> wrote:
>
> Not that I'm not appreciative of the efforts of VPFree2, but I found
> the now defunct VPFree database to be a much better layout, easier to
> read,and more informative. Maybe the VPFree2 people who are now in
> charge of data updating could use the "old" format? Anyone share
the
> same view?
>
> Larry F.
>

#7

I too am appreciative of all the effort..
Change takes time to adjust too, but I favor VPfree database so far.

···

--- On Fri, 2/27/09, jane0662 <jane.whitaker@att.net> wrote:

From: jane0662 <jane.whitaker@att.net>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: VPFree2 Data base
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, February 27, 2009, 8:20 PM

Another vote to please bring back the database blog (or keep the old
one current). Thanks.

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups. com, "makin4vegas" <makin4vegas@ ...> wrote:

One thing they should add is the database blog that the old database
had where it showed the recent updates to the database.

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups. com, "lfcmja2000" <lfcmja@> wrote:
>
> Not that I'm not appreciative of the efforts of VPFree2, but I found
> the now defunct VPFree database to be a much better layout, easier to
> read,and more informative. Maybe the VPFree2 people who are now in
> charge of data updating could use the "old" format? Anyone share
the
> same view?
>
> Larry F.
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#8

I agree the VPFree database had a much better format and layout.

···

----- Original Message -----
  From: lfcmja2000
  To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 2:08 PM
  Subject: [vpFREE] VPFree2 Data base

  Not that I'm not appreciative of the efforts of VPFree2, but I found
  the now defunct VPFree database to be a much better layout, easier to
  read,and more informative. Maybe the VPFree2 people who are now in
  charge of data updating could use the "old" format? Anyone share the
  same view?

  Larry F.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1974 - Release Date: 02/26/09 14:51:00

--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 5124 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

The Professional version does not have this message

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#9

The layout,function and VP content is very similar to vpinsider.com
which charges an annual subscription fee of $65.00. Using the
advanced features of VPfree2 is an invaluable tool and time
saver for me as a frequent visitor.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Seussman" <dlvseuss@...> wrote:

I agree the VPFree database had a much better format and layout.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: lfcmja2000
  To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 2:08 PM
  Subject: [vpFREE] VPFree2 Data base

  Not that I'm not appreciative of the efforts of VPFree2, but I found
  the now defunct VPFree database to be a much better layout, easier to
  read,and more informative. Maybe the VPFree2 people who are now in
  charge of data updating could use the "old" format? Anyone share the
  same view?

  Larry F.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1974 - Release Date:

02/26/09 14:51:00

--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 5124 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

The Professional version does not have this message

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#10

While the old database was very useful and easy to browse the new
database is better in some ways. Search function is nice, especially
the advanced. Mobile use on my Blackberry is much better than the
original (although, the old database was fine when I had a Palm Treo).

Mac
www.CasinoCamper.com

#11

Hey, quick question...

Will all the VERY useful links be maintained and updated on the old
vpFREE site?

Mac

#12

The Casino DataBase, BLOG and LV Cross Directory are no
longer being updated.

All other (that come to mind) vpFREE links / pages will
continue to be maintained and updated.

vpFae

···

On 1 Mar 2009 at 3:51, Mac McClellan wrote:

Hey, quick question...

Will all the VERY useful links be maintained and updated on the old
vpFREE site?

#13

There are a lot of discrepancies in information between the two
databases. I assume that they are the result of human error in
manually entering the information and not actual database updates.

Example:

Sheraton Casino and Hotel Tunica, MS
http://members.cox.net/vp_free/G_SHER.htm
http://www.vpfree2.com/casino/sheraton-tunica

The old version has 12 different games/paytables, whereas the new
version has just 9.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "lfcmja2000" <lfcmja@...> wrote:

Not that I'm not appreciative of the efforts of VPFree2, but I found
the now defunct VPFree database to be a much better layout, easier to
read,and more informative. Maybe the VPFree2 people who are now in
charge of data updating could use the "old" format? Anyone share the
same view?
  
  Larry F.

#14

I agree. I can't seem to print out the entire scroll box contents....old format was very easy to navigate. Still valuable, though.

···

________________________________
From: kelso 1600 <kelso1600@hotmail.com>
To: vpfree@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 6:19:54 PM
Subject: RE: [vpFREE] VPFree2 Data base

I, also, find the old format much more appealing and easier on the eyes.

To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
From: lfcmja@aol.com
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:08:26 +0000
Subject: [vpFREE] VPFree2 Data base

Not that I'm not appreciative of the efforts of VPFree2, but I found
the now defunct VPFree database to be a much better layout, easier to
read,and more informative. Maybe the VPFree2 people who are now in
charge of data updating could use the "old" format? Anyone share the
same view?

Larry F.

------------------------------------

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Links

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: Discover 10 secrets about the new Windows Live.
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550F681DAD532637!7540.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_ugc_post_022009

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]