Your speculations are merely possibilities and are very
incomplete. Your "doesn't negate the obvious" conclusion
begs additional data, which I don't believe is public
information. I doubt if you even know which casinos Dancer
has done consulting work with (I don't), or if the video
poker has actually gotten worse shortly thereafter. And, any
objective analysis would have to compare the degree of
decline in video poker at Dancer consulted casinos with what
happened during the same time periods with all casinos.
vpFREE Administrator
------- Forwarded message follows -------
ยทยทยท
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
From: "jw776655" <jw776655@yahoo.com>
Date sent: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:22:04 -0000
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: I Just Have to Say It
vpFree Administrator - "Most of the Dancer bashing is based
on paytables getting worse and players getting no mailed or
trespassed at casinos where he consulted. This reasoning
isn't very convincing since players also got no mailed and
vp has been getting worse at a lot of casinos where Dancer
didn't consult."
Some common sense is called for.
What do you think Dancer offers the casino, as a vp
consultant?
A way to increase profits.
How do you do that [at least in the short term]:
Cut paytables.
Identify players who are ahead, and if they appear to be
ap's, 86 them.
What else COULD he offer that hasn't been tried - Drawings?
Gift of the day/week giveaways?
The fact that some casinos are doing this without him as a
consultant doesn't negate the obvious - at EVERY casino
where he consults, things get worse shortly thereafter.