vpFREE2 Forums

[vpFREE] Goodbye. (Was: More Anti-advantage player measures?)

This post got me going without my morning coffee. Coffee is brewed
with water that is near boiing (212 degrees F at sea level)....you can
not make it 30 degrees hotter than that!! Does somebody need to be
warned that coffee is HOT? And then when her hand told her that the
cup was hot, why did she put it in her lap from which point it got
spilled?

To attempt to bring this thread back to a semblance of relevance to
VP.... the above post says a whole lot about why people still think,
for example, that it matters whether a machine draws all 10 cards when
you press deal, or whether some machines can be "loose" or "tight", or
just about every other casino myth in existence.

Why? Because even when presented with a link detailing the findings of
fact made by the jury in the McDonald's case (one of several that have
been posted in this thread) some people STILL refuse to believe
reality, and go off insisting on things like "Coffee is brewed with
water that is ... 212 degrees F" when that conclusively is not true or
relevant in the context of the discussion.

It's patently clear that the above poster didn't bother to avail
himself of any of the information available to him in this thread,
before spouting off some more nonsense which does nothing more than
perpetuate a myth.

Discussions of fact are clearly pointless in the face of irrationality,
hysteria, ignorance, and plain old stupidity. To borrow a notion from
Einstein, the choice to remain ignorant in the face of plain fact is
the essence of insanity.

Bill Velek had noted me as being off the list in a prior post. I
wasn't, until this morning. This was the last straw.

My unsubscribe will follow.

···

To: <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
From: "John F. Thomas, Jr., Esq." <jfthomas3@comcast.net>
Date sent: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:33:46 -0500
Subject: RE: [vpFREE] Goodbye. (Was: More Anti-advantage player measures?)

From: "John F. Thomas, Jr., Esq." <jfthomas3@c...>
Date sent: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:33:46 -0500
Subject: RE: [vpFREE] Goodbye. (Was: More Anti-advantage

player measures?)

... snip
Discussions of fact are clearly pointless in the face of irrationality,
hysteria, ignorance, and plain old stupidity. To borrow a notion from
Einstein, the choice to remain ignorant in the face of plain fact is
the essence of insanity.

I, for one, will not miss someone whose first approach is to use name
calling instead of actually trying to present some facts.

Dick

I, for one, will not miss someone whose first approach is to use

name

calling instead of actually trying to present some facts.

>>

Unless I missed something, his first post on the McDonald's topic was
helpful and very politely worded, and did link to some useful facts.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "darvell3492000" <darvell349@a...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> I, for one, will not miss someone whose first approach is to use
name
> calling instead of actually trying to present some facts.
>
> >>

Unless I missed something, his first post on the McDonald's topic

was

helpful and very politely worded, and did link to some useful facts.

Your absolutely correct. But that post was not in repsonse to someone
questioning his facts. However, as soon as ONE person questioned him
he immediately went off the deep end.

I really don't disagree with anything he said relative to the
McDonald's case as I don't have any of the facts. The question
relative to the temp. of the water was actually an honest one I
believe as many folks do boil water to make coffee. So, why not a
simple courteous reply?

Dick

PS. This was not the first time this poster has resorted to name
calling.

Nice post, DICK.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "darvell3492000"

<darvell349@a...>

wrote:
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
>
> > I, for one, will not miss someone whose first approach is to

use

> name
> > calling instead of actually trying to present some facts.
> >
> > >>
>
>
>
> Unless I missed something, his first post on the McDonald's topic
was
> helpful and very politely worded, and did link to some useful

facts.

Your absolutely correct. But that post was not in repsonse to

someone

questioning his facts. However, as soon as ONE person questioned

him

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

he immediately went off the deep end.

I really don't disagree with anything he said relative to the
McDonald's case as I don't have any of the facts. The question
relative to the temp. of the water was actually an honest one I
believe as many folks do boil water to make coffee. So, why not a
simple courteous reply?

Dick

PS. This was not the first time this poster has resorted to name
calling.