DELETED on vpFREE and MOVED to FREEvpFREE
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
···
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
From: LKReels@aol.com
Date sent: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:24:17 EST
Subject: [vpFREE] RE: Dancer's claim
In a message dated 11/20/2005 10:56:08 PM Central Standard Time,
vpFREE@yahoogroups.com writes:
Asking me to pay for 10-year-old issues that I didn't think were worth much when they
were new isn't going to yield him any money.
I' m not even close to being one of the experts, but I am an intelligent human being.
You are a sneaky one but I think all of us can see this for what is it. Yet another
negative comment.......compounding the situation. I think the administrator has given
you an awful lot of leeway since you started posting and you have reached the point
where you are now taking advantages of his/her good graces.
<snip>
It is possible that he yielded to my demands and pulled the article before it was
published. In that case, I will definitely apologize that I claim he published it rather
than just writing it.
Honestly................."I THOUGHT I told you months ago that Venetian was rewarding 4%
cashback. Didn't I??? Gee..............sorry" "I just know I read that" is not a defense
when you then turn around and publish negative comments based on potentially faulty
memory. If you are going to comment publicly, then you are right about one thing - it
has now become a case of put up or shut up. YOU'RE responsibility, not his. People who
publish check and re-check their facts so as not to mislead. I'm guessing that your
motivation in making the original comment in your column was qualifies as more than to
mislead. A little character assasination of someone who refused to "yield to your
demands" once upon a time in a community you make a living from is the more likely
answer.
<snip>
I will definitely apologize that I claim he published it rather than just writing it.
I sense hedging one's bets comin' on.
LK