vpFREE2 Forums

[vpFREE] A Modest Proposal

#1

thymos_one posted:

Several times on this topic

One final thought on this topic

And then he posted another thought.

And then he posted yet another thought.

The Administrator has pointed out that two of the modest
proposals are already vpFREE policies and that the third
(mandatory posting) is a bad idea.

In the last couple of days you've offered your modest
proposal several times, suggested that we should have
Rob Singer as a posting member, questioned the
intelligence of Singer and Bob Dancer, concluded that
Dancer was bad for video poker, disagreed with our
Bayesian Analysis expert etc..

I think that I understand your motivations and believe that
others may be interested in who and where these ideas
are coming from.

Some may remember you under another Yahoo ID as
the self proclaimed math genius, who couldn't understand
the mathematics behind match play coupons. I however
remember you as a disgruntled member who wasn't very
happy about having his posting privileges revoked, twice,
for posting negative personal comments.

It's pretty obvious to me that you're trying to exact revenge
on vpFREE by creating disruption.

Shame on you.

vpFae

#2

I'm hesitant to even respond to the post below, it is just too
creepy. The author seems to be suffering from some form of paranoia.
I hope you feel better, and really hope the medication works.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vpFae6128305" <vpfae6128305@C...>
wrote:

···

thymos_one posted:

Several times on this topic

One final thought on this topic

And then he posted another thought.

And then he posted yet another thought.

The Administrator has pointed out that two of the modest
proposals are already vpFREE policies and that the third
(mandatory posting) is a bad idea.

In the last couple of days you've offered your modest
proposal several times, suggested that we should have
Rob Singer as a posting member, questioned the
intelligence of Singer and Bob Dancer, concluded that
Dancer was bad for video poker, disagreed with our
Bayesian Analysis expert etc..

I think that I understand your motivations and believe that
others may be interested in who and where these ideas
are coming from.

Some may remember you under another Yahoo ID as
the self proclaimed math genius, who couldn't understand
the mathematics behind match play coupons. I however
remember you as a disgruntled member who wasn't very
happy about having his posting privileges revoked, twice,
for posting negative personal comments.

It's pretty obvious to me that you're trying to exact revenge
on vpFREE by creating disruption.

Shame on you.

vpFae

#3

Hmmm..... What we really need is Dick's analysis of this post. And
how about a poll that'll vote on allowing me to post for a few days
on vpFREE to see how many will end up getting penaltized. It's not
easy being the most popular topic on a forum with over 5000 people on
it and not being able to satisfy the multitude with the truth.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "thymos_one" <thymos_one@y...>
wrote:I'm hesitant to even respond to the post below, it is just too

creepy. The author seems to be suffering from some form of

paranoia. I hope you feel better, and really hope the medication
works.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vpFae6128305"

<vpfae6128305@C...>

···

wrote:
> In the last couple of days you've offered your modest
> proposal several times, suggested that we should have
> Rob Singer as a posting member, questioned the
> intelligence of Singer and Bob Dancer, concluded that
> Dancer was bad for video poker, disagreed with our
> Bayesian Analysis expert etc..
>
> I think that I understand your motivations and believe that
> others may be interested in who and where these ideas
> are coming from.
>
> Some may remember you under another Yahoo ID as
> the self proclaimed math genius, who couldn't understand
> the mathematics behind match play coupons. I however
> remember you as a disgruntled member who wasn't very
> happy about having his posting privileges revoked, twice,
> for posting negative personal comments.
>
> It's pretty obvious to me that you're trying to exact revenge
> on vpFREE by creating disruption.
>
> Shame on you.
>
> vpFae