In a message dated 9/24/2007 6:20:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
sjs5572z@yahoo.com writes:
I'm not speaking for randomstu, just pointing out a logical
interpretation of his statement.
···
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your "logic," not necessarily his. Since I was responding to his post, your
interpretation is not relevant to my response. Stu seems to be a
straightforward guy with no particular agenda. I have my doubts about you.
======================================
By your logic, if advantage
players give their hard earned winnings (or freebies) to family
members with a drug habit, they'd be helping society in the process.
------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
Crap and nonsense. I said it benefited others. I said nothing about
"society." There is always the chance that the recipients abuse the gifts, as is the
case for anyone giving anything to anyone else, no matter how the gifts are
earned. You can donate clothes to a respected charity, and have the recipients
sell the clothes and buy drugs. Does that mean that your donations were
ill-advised? By your "logic," yes!
=============================================
Helping out friends and family is nice, but it's still just a form a
redistribution.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
As is the case for someone with a "regular" job helping their friends and
family. Just a form of redistribution. So? How is that a bad thing?
And my polite request for you to allow randomstu to answer for himself was
just that. A polite request. Since you confuse that with my being a "content
censor," I easily dismiss anything you might deem to be "logic."
Brian
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]