vpFREE2 Forums

Voting Reminder for Rob Singer Poll

I will tabulate the status of the ongoing poll on Thursday
evening at 8:00 PM PT. to determine if Rob Singer will be
allowed to do moderated posting on vpFREE. The original
announcement is appended below.

Vote (or change your vote) at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?id=11057678

<a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?id=11057678">
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?id=11057678</a>

···

*******************

To: vpFREE <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
From: vpFREE <vpfreevp@yahoo.com>
Date sent: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:25:45 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [vpFREE] Should Rob Singer become a "moderated member" of vpFREE?

Greetings from Las Vegas, Home of Positive ER Video Poker:

I invited Rob Singer to become a "moderated member" of vpFREE,
subject to some special restrictions, and he accepted my
invitation, to take effect when I thought the time was right.

When I extended the invitation, I was laboring under the delusion that
vpFREE would be converting to full-moderation, which would afford
greater control over disruptive situations. Now that we're sticking
with semi-moderation, I would still like to honor the invitation,
because I don't like having anyone banned, and I'm confident that the
agreed on restrictions will allow his participation to be handled in a
non-disruptive manner. However, learning from the moderation vote, I'm
going to run RS's participation up the flagpole and see who salutes,
via a new Poll I'm setting up. Then, If a majority of the voters are
against his being a "moderated member", I'll withdraw the invitation.
If less than half are opposed, he will become a "moderated member".

                       *******************

                         RESTRICTIONS

He will be allowed to post a monthly trip report (with the standard
vpFREE Rob Singer disclaimer appended) in which he is free to talk
about his system and anything else that is VP related, as long as he
conforms to vpFREE Rules and Policies, and Posting Guidelines.

In his other vpFREE posts, he won't be allowed to push his agenda
(promoting discipline and short term luck as the only way to VP
profits) or to initiate any discussions of his system.

vpFREE will continue to carry his weekly GAMING TODAY column.

I would prefer that his participation doesn't result in discussions of
the Rob Singer agenda or system. Both have been covered extensively on
the vp_heaven Yahoo Group, and further discussion IMO is counter-
productive. If any such discussion develops, it must be long on facts
and short on anecdotal evidence and rhetoric. Prolonged, disruptive
threads won't be allowed.

                        *******************

For those who would like more information on Rob Singer, see:

http://tinyurl.com/684c

<a href="http://tinyurl.com/684c">
http://tinyurl.com/684c</a>

The Rob Singer Poll will be ongoing, but I'll tabulate the results on
Thursday 6 March to determine if he becomes a "moderated member" or
not.

vpFREE Administrator

Just to clear up a point of potential confusion:

If you vote that you are "opposed" to moderated membership for RS, that
means that you are voting against ANY posting privileges. Un-moderated
membership is not a voting option. For example, if someone voted against
moderated membership because they favored un-moderated membership, they
would instead be voting for no membership (posting privileges).

I am not campaigning one way or the other, only pointing out that the only
three options are: moderated, no posting privileges at all, and don't
care.

I apologize to those who see the three options as self-explanatory, but
you'd have thought the Florida ballots were, too, in 2000. We'd all hate to
see this election end up in the Supreme Court. <g>

lb
--JOB: about even--
--DW: about even--
---BP: about even--
--vpfree posts: about even--

···

----- Original Message -----
From: "vpFREEvp" <vpFREEvp@LVCM.com>
To: "vpFREEvp" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 6:39 PM
Subject: [vpFREE] Voting Reminder for Rob Singer Poll

I will tabulate the status of the ongoing poll on Thursday
evening at 8:00 PM PT. to determine if Rob Singer will be
allowed to do moderated posting on vpFREE. The original
announcement is appended below.

Vote (or change your vote) at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?id=11057678

<a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?id=11057678">
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?id=11057678</a>

                      *******************

To: vpFREE <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
From: vpFREE <vpfreevp@yahoo.com>
Date sent: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:25:45 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [vpFREE] Should Rob Singer become a "moderated member" of vpFREE?

Greetings from Las Vegas, Home of Positive ER Video Poker:

I invited Rob Singer to become a "moderated member" of vpFREE,
subject to some special restrictions, and he accepted my
invitation, to take effect when I thought the time was right.

When I extended the invitation, I was laboring under the delusion that
vpFREE would be converting to full-moderation, which would afford
greater control over disruptive situations. Now that we're sticking
with semi-moderation, I would still like to honor the invitation,
because I don't like having anyone banned, and I'm confident that the
agreed on restrictions will allow his participation to be handled in a
non-disruptive manner. However, learning from the moderation vote, I'm
going to run RS's participation up the flagpole and see who salutes,
via a new Poll I'm setting up. Then, If a majority of the voters are
against his being a "moderated member", I'll withdraw the invitation.
If less than half are opposed, he will become a "moderated member".

                       *******************

                         RESTRICTIONS

He will be allowed to post a monthly trip report (with the standard
vpFREE Rob Singer disclaimer appended) in which he is free to talk
about his system and anything else that is VP related, as long as he
conforms to vpFREE Rules and Policies, and Posting Guidelines.

In his other vpFREE posts, he won't be allowed to push his agenda
(promoting discipline and short term luck as the only way to VP
profits) or to initiate any discussions of his system.

vpFREE will continue to carry his weekly GAMING TODAY column.

I would prefer that his participation doesn't result in discussions of
the Rob Singer agenda or system. Both have been covered extensively on
the vp_heaven Yahoo Group, and further discussion IMO is counter-
productive. If any such discussion develops, it must be long on facts
and short on anecdotal evidence and rhetoric. Prolonged, disruptive
threads won't be allowed.

                        *******************

For those who would like more information on Rob Singer, see:

http://tinyurl.com/684c

<a href="http://tinyurl.com/684c">
http://tinyurl.com/684c</a>

The Rob Singer Poll will be ongoing, but I'll tabulate the results on
Thursday 6 March to determine if he becomes a "moderated member" or
not.

vpFREE Administrator

vpFREE Home Page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE

vpFREE Links:
http://www.lvcm.com/tomesims/VP/Links.html

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

there are really only two options, not three. admin said he will
count all "don't care" votes as "moderated" votes. as a result the
final tally may swing the other way since the "don't care" votes are
significant

Frank

Just to clear up a point of potential confusion:
...
I am not campaigning one way or the other, only pointing out that

the only

three options are: moderated, no posting privileges at all, and

don't

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Lawrence Boxer" <ljboxer@e...> wrote:

care.

there are really only two options, not three. admin said he will
count all "don't care" votes as "moderated" votes. as a result the
final tally may swing the other way since the "don't care" votes are
significant

Frank

Interesting concept. We may as well welcome RS to the group. :slight_smile:

···

Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Voting Reminder for Rob Singer Poll