I've run into this before, where one person is playing two side-by-
side machines. I would assume this happens because of the limited
number of machines in a particular casino with attractive pay
schedules/comps, and/or slow machines.
The first time I saw it was a couple of weeks ago when a casino re-
opened up a couple of full pay machines at the dollar level. These
two were reported to be the only two full pay dollar machines in a
major eastern US casino: the rest were only at the 25 cent level.
I got there at 8:00 AM on a Saturday morning and from a distance
only saw one woman playing at the bank of machines where the two
newly reported machines existed. I was excited figuring that at worst
at least one of the two machines would be open. As I got closer, I
was wrong. She had her players card inserted into two machines, and
had credits in the two machines and was playing the two side-by-side
machines in an alternating fashion.
Luckily for me, the report was wrong and the entire bank of
machines was now $1.00 full pay, so I had a machine to play. But my
question is:
What if these were the only two $1.00 full pay machines in the
entire casino. Would it be wrong (improper etiquette) to ask the
player of dual machines to give up one of them to allow another
player to play one of them? I don't see anything wrong in playing two
machines, but if these are the only two machines in the casino with
positive characteristics and I were playing the two of them and a
player arrived and asked if he could play one of them, personally, I
would feel obligated to give up the second machine. And I'd allow
another player to take over one of the machines.
Let's say one asked a player to give up one of two of the machines
they were playing and they refused to give one up. Would it be
inappropriate to ask a casino employee to ask the person to
discontinue play on the second machine on behalf of the other
interested player.
I'd think it would be common sense and common courtesy (and a good
casino policy) for a player to give up a second machine if another
player asked to play on one of them.
On the other hand, you could analogize it to a blackjack player
playing two hands at the only $5.00 table in the casino while others
are waiting in line to play. But I think with VP arguably it is even
more rude to not give up the second slot, since one player in VP
typically is not maximizing both machines when playing two, while it
makes no difference in BJ whether one player is playing two hands or
two players are playing one hand each to the overall speed or
efficiency of the game.
I'm not certain how the BJ situation is handled, but I would think
it would not be wrong to ask a dual VP machine player to give up one
machine so you could play one as well. And if they refused, I would
think that if the shut out patron asked the appropriate casino
employee to intervene, that it would be appropriate and in good
policy for the casino to do so. Of course this would need to be
handled tactfully.
What do you think about the etiquette in asking a dual VP player
to give up one machine? What do you think should be the Casino's
policy if the dual player refused to give up one of the two machines
to another interested player?
Thanks.
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Charles" <fromthevault@y...> wrote:
girl straddling two chairs while playing two machines. It was
quite the sight; almost like she was playing a piano.