Harry and Bill discussed VLTs on this forum--both are very knowledgeable on this topic. I'm going to add my two cents worth.
A video lottery terminal, VLT, is an electronic game played on a video terminal -- it's networked and can be monitored, controlled and audited by a central computer. (The central computer, for example, has a shut down command that can disable every device within a jurisdiction--this ensures compliance with legislated operating hour mandates. Most states use GTECH.) It's up to the state to determine whether or not each device will have a RNG--random number generator. So far, all states, except New York, have opted for a RNG for their VLTs. Here's the tricky part. VLTs are authorized through the state lottery and considered by law to be lotteries and not commercial gaming. Furthermore, the definition they use for RNG is different from the one I use. They define a random number generator as a mechanism inside the computer of Class III games that ensures that each pull has an equal chance of hitting the jackpot. Also, the officials I spoke with made it clear that the VLTs found in non-casinos within the state were on the same network as those at racinos--they followed the same regulations. However, you need to be sure the device in a non-casino has the state's decal so you know it was licensed and legally installed. (Be aware that many devices in Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina have literally been dragged into courtrooms--they were unlicensed and illegally installed.)
Specifically:
Rhode Island: RNG--No Minimum Payback %: I was told that the payback was around 92.9% by Joe Doersey, a lottery official.
New Mexico: RNG--they call their devices EGMs, Electronic Gaming Machines--80%-No Maximum, per Donovan Lieurance
Delaware: RNG--87%-95% Payback, per Jim Logue
West Virginia: RNG--80%-90% Payback, per Deputy Director Arnold--Allow 5 devices in non-casinos, except fraternal organizations, where 10 are allowed.
These minimum/maximum percentages can be changed by the legislature. Make sure you understand that commercial casinos are separate entities and may have different minimum/maximum regulations.
Harry pointed out that the tax rates are so high in many jurisdictions that the VLTs are not worth playing. Keep in mind that the more people in on "revenue sharing" the less left over for players. Some jurisdictions have two partners--the state lottery and the track or jai alai fronton owner--others have three--track owner, state lottery and the device owner. In other words, if lots of people are sharing the profits plus the tax rate is high, then you can expect a machine with a poor pay table, even if there is a RNG.
According to gaming attorney I. Nelson Rose, tribes can only use VLTs if the state has a lottery. We already know that Florida's tribes use devices without RNGs and likewise Washington State. There are many other tribal casinos with VLTs that don't have RNGs.
Linda Boyd
Author: "The Video Poker Edge"
www.squareonepublishers.com
Games/Gambling
Amazon link
Toll Free: 877-900-BOOK
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]