vpFREE2 Forums

Veteran Status

It's funny to see Rob, when presented with a fact that proves his
assertion wrong, to come back and say he's always right. I very

good insight into what makes him tick.

Another defensive response. What does that tell you.

Nothing anti-USA in my comments. Most of my comments are simple
refutations of the BS you try to pass on as fact. Just like your
gambling systems. The problem is you don't like it when someone
disagrees with you. Get over it.

See what I mean? You are total anti-USA, and you belong in another
country. Your BIG problem is that you criticize everyone and
everything no matter where they're coming from. Imagine living with
you!

Not in the least. My life is the same now as it was before the
election.

Sour.

> rather than try to work
> with the program your country has given you,

I've never said I wouldn't live with the results of the election.

If that's what you meant in your ambiguous response.

You have no choice, and you mealy-mouthed it once again just so you
could say "I didn't say that!"

> of criticizm. What a joy.

I think you must have been looking in a mirror when you made this
statement. All you have done on this forum is criticize other
successful gamblers. Another insight into your personality.

More defense without originality this time.

Were they using a progressive system? Playing positive machines? In
my case I'm several thousand ahead. So, it shows once again you

were wrong, wrong, wrong when trying to allude I was losing.

They were playing the same bozo system as you--advantage play. And
just how is anyone supposed to believe someone as anti-American as
you?

You must not have like the analogy. However, not voting for the
recently elected president does NOT "qualify .. for treason and
lunacy". Statements like yours' are so stupid it defies logic, just
like your gambling systems.

No, but your post-election statements being made here do. You could
have been like 55million others and not utterred treasonous remarks.
But YOU are insecure with every subject.

Of course, Clinton didn't invade Iraq.

Right. He let OBL off the hook.

You have this backwards. The president "answer"s to the American
people, not the other way around. Another example of your twisted
thinking.

I kind of don't think he's answering to you. If he did we'd be facing
bio-terror ASAP.

In any event, I did NOT say the president was like Hitler.

More defense. You compared our president to Hitler favorably. And
traitorously.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

> This is the one statement that sums up Dick's reasoning: He's
afraid of the terrorists, and rather than face them he would choose

to proclaim everything was America's fault and apologize to any whom

hefeels we've wronged along the way. Not really the kind of guy

you'd want in your foxhole, is he.

Once again your assumptions about me are 180 degress off the

target. Pretty much a constant with you. If you were actually reading
what I've been saying then you'd know my position is to actually go
after the terrorists that attacked us.

It's exactly what you've been mealy-mouthing and saying outright. Not
too good to see in print again, is it?

> I saw a fool on TV tonight wail because he said we were wrong
> to 'take Fallujah'--that it'll just fuel more of that famous

anger of Muslims towards us (and 'us' does not include Dick). A true

coward's statement. And guess who agree with him? Yup, Kofi Anan.

Right or wrong we have now created a new regime in Iraq and I

realize that the US cannot walk out now. It's about time we did
something other than stand around and collect intelligence as you'd
have us believe.

Right. But as soon as we attack, you say we flame hatred and kill
innocents. Flip-flopping at it's best.

Hmmm. So now your stating that GWB has started WWIII.

Exactly as a traitor would speak. Islam started it.

> Do you think the Palestinians will
> EVER get along with the Israelis--when every one of those

barbarian slobs are taught and will ALWAYS be taught to hate and
exterminate Jews from the day they can hear?

I wonder how Rob would feel if he were put in the same position as
the Palestinians? I'm sure he'd welcome the Jews with open arms

since he's not a Muslim.

Now sympathy for the Palestinians, and your probably saying a prayer
for the poor soul of Arafat. No one knows how they'd feel in ANY
other situation, but we all are capable of knowing right from wrong.
The Palestinians are bred as terrorists, and they deserve to be wiped
out when they suicide bomb.

> What's sad but true is that because
> of all the outcry for political correctness, the love of

diversity, people like Dick's cowardice, criticizm, and 'can't we
just talk it over' denial-like attitude, and the liberal's and ACLU's
whining over issues like the Patriot Act, there WILL be another huge
attack on our soil at some point in time.

So now your stating all we've really done is fuel the terrorism.

Yes, when you understand the "we" in your statement is liberals and
peaceniks like you--and not GWB.

> We can only hope Michael Moore will be
> there at that time. Yet at the same time, that's what it will

take for those idiots in this country to FINALLY wake up, and for us
to ALL see that the only way to stop it all is to destroy one large

> Muslim city after another starting with several in Saudi Arabia.

At one point we'll stop--but not until wiping out half of the Islamic

> world. We'll give them one more chance, and if one more attack
occirs anywhere against a US or ally's interest then they'll all be

gone. It's the only way to handle religious fanatics, and they will
be the cause of the near-entire loss of many decent Muslims who are
in those same countries that harbor terrorists. It will come to be.

Now why would I ever want to disagree with someone who thinks like
this?

Because you're a pure-bred critic, and critics are losers from the
get-go.

We can't even find one single man, Osama, so let's try to kill all
the Muslims in the world. I think I've finally found someone MORE
evil than Saddam. This is some of the same logic Saddam possessed
only at a less grande level.

Obviously, you can't figure out what i said.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

>
> Like I said Dick, you're a coward through & through.

And that's supposed to worry me? Having a warmonger think I'm a
coward ... That's actually a compliment.

I don't worry you. You worry you. It's YOU who has to live in that
corrupt mind of yours.

Like you??? Just what have you done "on the battlefield"?

I've killed on the battlefield--and up close. Probably while you were
glued to a video poker machine.

> You are so excited about OBL that you make it look as
> though he's your hero, and you practically worship Hitler.

I think just about everyone here can now see the similarities

between your views and Hitlers'. You've done a great job of that.
Thank you.

Defense again.

> All your
> responses to this poster have been in defense, and that is one
thing
> you certainly do not know how to do. Imagine someone like you
> defending our country..... You blame the US for mutant Islam, you
> blame the administration for mutant Islam,

You should at least try to understand there are extremists in every
culture (look in the mirror). What the US, in previous and current
administrations, has done is focus the extremists hatred on the US.
In many cases we did create them (Osama?), in other cases they
already existed just looking for someone to hate.

More defense.

This is one big difference between you and me. I don't go on video
poker forums (of all places) and rant on about MY politics. That's
one reason you don't really don't know what I believe. However, I
have no problem pointing out errors in your views. And, if you
continue to post your political views here I will continue to point
out these errors.

Bazooka--it's "VPFREE" not Dick says to do it this way. You like it
though, so you can criticize. Making believe you're pointing out
errors is a cop out that's clear. You are a coward for saying what
you have here, and you do belong in Canada--like Albert P.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> It's funny to see Rob, when presented with a fact that proves his
> assertion wrong, to come back and say he's always right. I very
good insight into what makes him tick.

Another defensive response.

In your mind only. I simply stated a fact.

What does that tell you.
>
> Nothing anti-USA in my comments. Most of my comments are simple
> refutations of the BS you try to pass on as fact. Just like your
> gambling systems. The problem is you don't like it when someone
> disagrees with you. Get over it.

See what I mean? You are total anti-USA, and you belong in another
country. Your BIG problem is that you criticize everyone and
everything no matter where they're coming from. Imagine living with
you!

Everyone can see that your definition of anti-USA is to disagree with
you. Sorry, Mr Ego, your silly assertions are worthless. Like I said
before, get over it.

>
> Not in the least. My life is the same now as it was before the
> election.

Sour.

The fact is most folks lives are changed very little by a
presidential election (at least in the short term). It was humorous
that the liberals tried to use high drug prices as one of their
campaign issues when drug prices went up just as much during the
Clinton years. Big money still has way too much influence over all of
our politicians.

>
> > rather than try to work
> > with the program your country has given you,
>
> I've never said I wouldn't live with the results of the election.
If that's what you meant in your ambiguous response.

You have no choice, and you mealy-mouthed it once again just so you
could say "I didn't say that!"

Wrong again. You keep trying to attribute specify positions to me and
then say I've flip-floped, or I'm mealy-mouthed. It's a ridiculous
tactic. You're so obvious.

>
> > of criticizm. What a joy.
>
> I think you must have been looking in a mirror when you made this
> statement. All you have done on this forum is criticize other
> successful gamblers. Another insight into your personality.

More defense without originality this time.

Just stating the facts.

>
> Were they using a progressive system? Playing positive machines?

In

> my case I'm several thousand ahead. So, it shows once again you
were wrong, wrong, wrong when trying to allude I was losing.

They were playing the same bozo system as you--advantage play. And
just how is anyone supposed to believe someone as anti-American as
you?

I would say you are about as anti-American as it can get. I doubt
you'd get too many to say "nukeem" is a true American position.

>
> You must not have like the analogy. However, not voting for the
> recently elected president does NOT "qualify .. for treason and
> lunacy". Statements like yours' are so stupid it defies logic,

just

> like your gambling systems.

No, but your post-election statements being made here do. You could
have been like 55million others and not utterred treasonous

remarks.

But YOU are insecure with every subject.

Not a single "treasonous" remark have I uttered. Please quote a
single one or admit, once again, that you are completely in ERROR.

>
Of course, Clinton didn't invade Iraq.

Right. He let OBL off the hook.

One more reason to dislike Clinton. Your point?

>
> You have this backwards. The president "answer"s to the American
> people, not the other way around. Another example of your twisted
> thinking.

I kind of don't think he's answering to you. If he did we'd be

facing

bio-terror ASAP.

Would we now. I see you don't let the fact that NO bio-weapons have
been found in Iraq have any effect on your opinion. Of course, you
have a history of ignoring facts about VP so why should anyone be
suprised.

>
> In any event, I did NOT say the president was like Hitler.

More defense. You compared our president to Hitler favorably. And
traitorously.

No, I didn't, I simply said I wouldn't vote for either Bush or
Hitler. Your reading comprehension problem continually gets in the
way. However, I will compare your beliefs to Hitlers. Only you want
to nuke half the world and kill billions of people. Hitler wasn't
quite that bad.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

In your mind only. I simply stated a fact.

You state nebulous, liberal points that have already been proven to
be wrong, and those which will also lead to the demise of this
country.

> See what I mean? You are total anti-USA, and you belong in

another country. Your BIG problem is that you criticize everyone and

> everything no matter where they're coming from. Imagine living

with you!

Everyone can see that your definition of anti-USA is to disagree

with you. Sorry, Mr Ego, your silly assertions are worthless. Like I
said before, get over it.

Your warped view again. All you feel good doing is criticizing what
is, and making believe you have a better plan like Kerry kept saying
without telling anyone what that is. You've criticized everything
that holds the country together, because you are not a happy person.
You have no originality, you're all defense posture, and you prove
here to be the grumpy old man I exposed in the vp discussion.

I've never said I wouldn't live with the results of the election.
> If that's what you meant in your ambiguous response.
>
> You have no choice, and you mealy-mouthed it once again just so

you could say "I didn't say that!"

Wrong again. You keep trying to attribute specify positions to me

and then say I've flip-floped, or I'm mealy-mouthed. It's a
ridiculous tactic. You're so obvious.

Ridiculous? It describes you perfectly. You haven't been clear on
anything other than your hatred of this country.

I would say you are about as anti-American as it can get. I doubt
you'd get too many to say "nukeem" is a true American position.

When you don't specify then total input given you, that's when you
look your dumbest. The scenario once again was AFTER a WMD goes off
over here Einstein. Your way of making sure it never happens again
would be to give the UN 18 years to see what they could do, see if
you could get a meeting with OBL and others in order to negotiate a
surrender, and ask michael moore to do a documentary idolizing OBL
and his buddies. You do just as the liberal hippies and queers do--
you make believe there was no reason to go to war, and you'd cower if
we were attacked again. I'm actually torn between hoping it does and
hoping it doesn't--just so I could watch people like you, Kerry,
Kennedy, Moore, Sarandon and others squirm and lose their minds.

Not a single "treasonous" remark have I uttered. Please quote a
single one or admit, once again, that you are completely in ERROR.

Again, you deny deny deny. You are a traitor of the highest accord,
and you should be shot.

One more reason to dislike Clinton. Your point?

To clarify yet another of your flip-flops.

> I kind of don't think he's answering to you. If he did we'd be
facing bio-terror ASAP.

Would we now. I see you don't let the fact that NO bio-weapons have
been found in Iraq have any effect on your opinion. Of course, you
have a history of ignoring facts about VP so why should anyone be
suprised.

Once again, the UN wasted so much time with their token 'weapons
inspections' by allowing Saddam to push them around, that he had
plenty of time to send most of them to Syria, and he buried the
remainder of them in the dirt. But you, with your anti-American
sentiment, agree with the stall. And you also cry wolf that we
attacked Iraq after months of warnings to come clean. You see where
that type of attitude got Kerry, only he has money to enjoy now. You
don't. All you have is sour grapes that either won, and you are
required to stand by the US Gov't. regardless of your treasonous
beliefs and statements.

> More defense. You compared our president to Hitler favorably. And
> traitorously.

No, I didn't.

No I Didn't No I Didn't No I Didn't Waaa waaa waaa again!

I simply said I wouldn't vote for either Bush or Hitler.

Thereby drawing a close analogy between the two. You're sick Dick.
Even if you try to dance around your position here, you're a sick
man. .

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

His notion that terrorists attack us because we are aggressor just
shows his lack of knowledge on the subject.
The dune coons just killed one of the Netherlands most popular film
makers. Shot him in on the street and then and then tried to
decapitate him. The pacifist PC Dutch are now in an uproar and
demanding the Muslims be put out of the country. Amazing how you
change when you face the brutality of the religion of peace. As you
and I tried to explain to him it has nothing to do with our position
or politics. Because we are non-muslims we are targets.
And I agree with you. The Nukes will fly and the sooner they make the
middle East a glass parking lot the better.
I'm surprised Russian hasn't nuked some part of Chechnya.
To hell with world opinion. The security of our people are at risk.
Too many of these countries have hidden under our military skirt for
long enough (Canada a good example) When we need them they stick it
to us. Screw em!

> I see your logic ranks right up there with Robs'. Of course these
> countries now see us as an aggressor and are willing to "back off"
> for the time being. Do you think that means they are now our
>friends? Where do you think this will lead in the future? Or, have
>you even tried to think ahead? Of course, you haven't. Otherwise

you

>could seethe historic analogies and be much more wary of our

actions.

This is the one statement that sums up Dick's reasoning: He's

afraid

of the terrorists, and rather than face them he would choose to
proclaim everything was America's fault and apologize to any whom

he

feels we've wronged along the way. Not really the kind of guy you'd
want in your foxhole, is he.

I saw a fool on TV tonight wail because he said we were wrong
to 'take Fallujah'--that it'll just fuel more of that famous anger

of

Muslims towards us (and 'us' does not include Dick). A true

coward's

statement. And guess who agree with him? Yup, Kofi Anan.

As we do all this militarily AND FIGHT THIS RELIGIOUS WAR, DICK, it
doesn't take a genius to realize that it IS WWIII, and sooner or
later the nukes will be unleashed. Do you think the Palestinians

will

EVER get along with the Israelis--when every one of those barbarian
slobs are taught and will ALWAYS be taught to hate and exterminate
Jews from the day they can hear? What's sad but true is that

because

of all the outcry for political correctness, the love of diversity,
people like Dick's cowardice, criticizm, and 'can't we just talk it
over' denial-like attitude, and the liberal's and ACLU's whining

over

issues like the Patriot Act, there WILL be another huge attack on

our

soil at some point in time. We can only hope Michael moore will be
there at that time. Yet at the same time, that's what it will take
for those idiots in this country to FINALLY wake up, and for us to
ALL see that the only way to stop it all is to destroy one large
Muslim city after another starting with several in Saudi Arabia. At
one point we'll stop--but not until wiping out half of the Islamic
world. We'll give them one more chance, and if one more attack

occirs

anywhere against a US or ally's interest then they'll all be gone.
It's the only way to handle religious fanatics, and they will be

the

cause of the near-entire loss of many decent Muslims who are in

those

···

> In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
same countries that harbor terrorists. It will come to be.

Arafat just died!!

The world's foremost hater - and killer - of his neighbors is on his
way to hell as we speak! Hitler will finally have some more company
show up in his hole. He trained his people to hate Jews from the
moment he was born, and then to kill them as soon as they were old
enough to strap explosives to their body and walk. The world is truly
honored to see this terrorist eliminated from life as we know it.

RS

How fitting that he went to France to die.

I'm sure Sean Penn, Madonna, Martin Sheen and other slimeballs are
booking flights to attend the funeral. Kofi Annan was probably at
Yasser's bedside.

Can it get any better? 4 more for GWB, Daschle goes down, Fallujah
about to fall, Arafat dead.

Who's the successor? Hey, Al Gore need's a job...He's gonna end up
in the loony bin if he doesn't find something to do.

-Tom

Arafat just died!!

The world's foremost hater - and killer - of his neighbors is on

his

way to hell as we speak! Hitler will finally have some more company
show up in his hole. He trained his people to hate Jews from the
moment he was born, and then to kill them as soon as they were old
enough to strap explosives to their body and walk. The world is

truly

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

honored to see this terrorist eliminated from life as we know it.

RS

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "bonuspokergod"
<bonuspokergod@y...> wrote:

Yes, it's been quite a remarkable, rightious, and glorious past 10
days. We found a way to FINALLY shut Kerry up, we've been able to
slap his mate Edwards back into the menial portal he slipped through
with his slick-talk, Michael Moore's been publicly embarrassed and is
probably losing weight as the ulcer takes over, Kofi Anan has a
terrorist funeral to attend that'll keep him out of NYC for a long-
overdue departure, and Hitler will have a welcome roommate where they
can play "Kill The Jews" in their never-ending nightmares of payback.

But let us not forget the mourning our friend Dick must now be going
through. Yesterday he sympathized with the Palestinian suicide
bombers, actually presenting a position amounting to how these people
don't have a choice and have been persecuted for oh such a long time!
Combine that with his belief that the terrorist attacks of 9-11 were
OUR fault, and how it was wrong to attack Iraq when we should have
allowed the UN a few more years of inspections and when we could have
sat down at the negotiation table to surrender to OBL for
our 'atrocities' - and don't forget how he feels about Israel's
mistreatment of the Palestinian mutations called Hamas and Islamic
Jihad - and you'll have a man beside himself today.

···

How fitting that he went to France to die.
I'm sure Sean Penn, Madonna, Martin Sheen and other slimeballs are
booking flights to attend the funeral. Kofi Annan was probably at
Yasser's bedside. Can it get any better? 4 more for GWB, Daschle
goes down, Fallujah about to fall, Arafat dead. Who's the successor?
Hey, Al Gore need's a job...He's gonna end up in the loony bin if he
doesn't find something to do.

Yup, if he looks up from his One Eyed Jacks screen to the TVs at the
Indian Casino, he's gonna be in for quite a shock. His expert play
accuracy percentage and EV, should he continue to play, will surely
go down the crapper. He might even leave his player's card in the
reader as he rushes out to mourn the loss of this peaceful man.

-Tom

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

But let us not forget the mourning our friend Dick must now begoing
through.

Not much of a surprise to see the media reactions to news today. I
was just watching the Today Show, and the crew is in such a somber
mood over Arafat's departure that I thought Katie "Communist" Couric
was about to break out in tears over it. Ann Coury acted as if her
dad had just died, and it's even wiped the smile off of Al Roker's
face. And as if that were not amazing enough, the fact that it's
Veteran's Day only encouraged Matt Lauer to criticize the operation
in Fallujah as "ineffective in stopping the 'so-called' insurgents".

These liberals will be singing a different tune towards our military
though (like they were doing for a time after 9-11) when and if
another attack happens in NYC and wipes out members of their
families. Guess who'll they'll come crying to then....

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

>
> >
> > Like I said Dick, you're a coward through & through.
>
> And that's supposed to worry me? Having a warmonger think I'm a
> coward ... That's actually a compliment.

I don't worry you. You worry you. It's YOU who has to live in that
corrupt mind of yours.

As usual you have it backwards. You really do need to get some help.
You're maniacal views are down right dangerous.

>
> Like you??? Just what have you done "on the battlefield"?

I've killed on the battlefield--and up close. Probably while you

were

glued to a video poker machine.

I don't believe a word of it. Just more of your lies.

>
> > You are so excited about OBL that you make it look as
> > though he's your hero, and you practically worship Hitler.
>
> I think just about everyone here can now see the similarities
between your views and Hitlers'. You've done a great job of that.
Thank you.

Defense again.

Nope, just pointing out the facts for which you clearly have no
rebuttal.

>
> > All your
> > responses to this poster have been in defense, and that is one
> thing
> > you certainly do not know how to do. Imagine someone like you
> > defending our country..... You blame the US for mutant Islam,

you

> > blame the administration for mutant Islam,
>
> You should at least try to understand there are extremists in

every

> culture (look in the mirror). What the US, in previous and

current

> administrations, has done is focus the extremists hatred on the

US.

> In many cases we did create them (Osama?), in other cases they
> already existed just looking for someone to hate.

More defense.

More facts.

>
> This is one big difference between you and me. I don't go on

video

> poker forums (of all places) and rant on about MY politics.

That's

> one reason you don't really don't know what I believe. However, I
> have no problem pointing out errors in your views. And, if you
> continue to post your political views here I will continue to

point

> out these errors.

Bazooka--it's "VPFREE" not Dick says to do it this way. You like it
though, so you can criticize. Making believe you're pointing out
errors is a cop out that's clear. You are a coward for saying what
you have here, and you do belong in Canada--like Albert P.

Did you miss the "VP" in VPFREE? You constantly amaze us with your
ability to look right past the obvious and say something really
stupid.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

With over 200,000 Americans having been killed in car accidents
during the five years it took Osama to plan out the 9-11 attacks
along with around 130,000 Americans having been killed in their cars
since then......I'm betting it's much more likely to happen in their
cars rather than in the hands of a terrorist.

Not much of a surprise to see the media reactions to news today. I
was just watching the Today Show, and the crew is in such a somber
mood over Arafat's departure that I thought Katie "Communist"

Couric

was about to break out in tears over it. Ann Coury acted as if her
dad had just died, and it's even wiped the smile off of Al Roker's
face. And as if that were not amazing enough, the fact that it's
Veteran's Day only encouraged Matt Lauer to criticize the operation
in Fallujah as "ineffective in stopping the 'so-called' insurgents".

These liberals will be singing a different tune towards our

military

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

though (like they were doing for a time after 9-11) when and if
another attack happens in NYC and wipes out members of their
families. Guess who'll they'll come crying to then....

As usual you have it backwards. You really do need to get some

help. You're maniacal views are down right dangerous--

Finish the statement:--to us cowards who still believe the way to
deal with terrorists is to ask them nicely to stop.

I don't believe a word of it. Just more of your lies.

How enlightening. You only believe you. And Al Franken.

Nope, just pointing out the facts for which you clearly have no
rebuttal.

Other than your hero-worshiping of OBL.

> > In many cases we did create them (Osama?), in other cases they
> > already existed just looking for someone to hate.
>
> More defense.

More facts.

You're defending terrorism's objectives all the time with what you
call facts, and you are shameful for it.

Did you miss the "VP" in VPFREE? You constantly amaze us with your
ability to look right past the obvious and say something really
stupid.

Hello McFly?! If this was solely for VP chat, the very strict
administrator would have cut this off long ago. Can you fit that into
your slide rule and come up with an answer??

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Psychophysical" <jimb777@w...>
wrote:

With over 200,000 Americans having been killed in car accidents
during the five years it took Osama to plan out the 9-11 attacks
along with around 130,000 Americans having been killed in their

cars since then......I'm betting it's much more likely to happen in
their cars rather than in the hands of a terrorist.

Probably--and hopefully--true. In most cases of car crashes, there's
no intentional malice. However, if it happens via terrorism, the
reason is clear. But we'll always still have pacifist cowards like
Dick claiming it was our fault we were attacked, we deserved it, and
"gee, what else could they do in the face of American agression"?

> Not much of a surprise to see the media reactions to news today.

I

> was just watching the Today Show, and the crew is in such a

somber

> mood over Arafat's departure that I thought Katie "Communist"
Couric
> was about to break out in tears over it. Ann Coury acted as if

her

> dad had just died, and it's even wiped the smile off of Al

Roker's

> face. And as if that were not amazing enough, the fact that it's
> Veteran's Day only encouraged Matt Lauer to criticize the

operation

> in Fallujah as "ineffective in stopping the 'so-called'

insurgents".

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
>
> These liberals will be singing a different tune towards our
military
> though (like they were doing for a time after 9-11) when and if
> another attack happens in NYC and wipes out members of their
> families. Guess who'll they'll come crying to then....

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> In your mind only. I simply stated a fact.

You state nebulous, liberal points that have already been proven to
be wrong, and those which will also lead to the demise of this
country.

And you think your racist views will save the country? Just more
evidence of what a complete idiot you are.

If you had any brains at all you'd understand that neither the
liberals of the conservatives are always right. They are both
constantly looking of polical advantages and both will say whatever
it takes to garner an advantage. That is why you need to think for
yourself and I realize asking you to actually think borders on the
impossible.

>
> > See what I mean? You are total anti-USA, and you belong in
another country. Your BIG problem is that you criticize everyone

and

> > everything no matter where they're coming from. Imagine living
with you!
>
> Everyone can see that your definition of anti-USA is to disagree
with you. Sorry, Mr Ego, your silly assertions are worthless. Like

I

said before, get over it.

Your warped view again. All you feel good doing is criticizing what
is, and making believe you have a better plan like Kerry kept

saying

without telling anyone what that is. You've criticized everything
that holds the country together, because you are not a happy

person.

It's so humerous to hear you pick on me for criticism. Criticism is
about all you ever post on this forum. It appears you can give it but
you can't take it. Get over it.

You have no originality, you're all defense posture, and you prove
here to be the grumpy old man I exposed in the vp discussion.

You can't say anything intelligent so you CRITICIZE. Typical Rob ...

>
> I've never said I wouldn't live with the results of the election.
> > If that's what you meant in your ambiguous response.
> >
> > You have no choice, and you mealy-mouthed it once again just so
you could say "I didn't say that!"
>
> Wrong again. You keep trying to attribute specify positions to me
and then say I've flip-floped, or I'm mealy-mouthed. It's a
ridiculous tactic. You're so obvious.

Ridiculous? It describes you perfectly. You haven't been clear on
anything other than your hatred of this country.

No, hatred is your dominion. Which you've made more than obvious.
This is the area that you should seek professional help. Do it before
it's too late!

> I would say you are about as anti-American as it can get. I doubt
> you'd get too many to say "nukeem" is a true American position.

When you don't specify then total input given you, that's when you
look your dumbest. The scenario once again was AFTER a WMD goes off
over here Einstein.

Even when a WMD goes off here, your strategy is doomed to failure and
about as anti-American as it gets. If you were bit by a dog you would
promote the extermination of dogs worldwide.

Your way of making sure it never happens again
would be to give the UN 18 years to see what they could do, see if
you could get a meeting with OBL and others in order to negotiate a
surrender, and ask michael moore to do a documentary idolizing OBL
and his buddies. You do just as the liberal hippies and queers do--
you make believe there was no reason to go to war, and you'd cower

if

we were attacked again.

Nope, that's not my way of thinking. Try again. You really need to
spend a little time to understand terrorism and get away from your
constant need for generalizations.

I'm actually torn between hoping it does and
hoping it doesn't--just so I could watch people like you, Kerry,
Kennedy, Moore, Sarandon and others squirm and lose their minds.

One more example of how sick you are.

> Not a single "treasonous" remark have I uttered. Please quote a
> single one or admit, once again, that you are completely in ERROR.

Again, you deny deny deny. You are a traitor of the highest accord,
and you should be shot.

I didn't see any quotes so I guess that means you realize that you
were in error but simply won't admit it. Typical.

> > I kind of don't think he's answering to you. If he did we'd be
> facing bio-terror ASAP.
>
> Would we now. I see you don't let the fact that NO bio-weapons

have

> been found in Iraq have any effect on your opinion. Of course,

you

> have a history of ignoring facts about VP so why should anyone be
> suprised.

Once again, the UN wasted so much time with their token 'weapons
inspections' by allowing Saddam to push them around, that he had
plenty of time to send most of them to Syria, and he buried the
remainder of them in the dirt.

One again you ignore all the facts. The sad thing is you really
believe this crap. It's obvious you maintain this belief in order to
maintain your warmongering attitude. It's your VP arguments all over
again. When presented with undeniable facts, you deny them.

But you, with your anti-American
sentiment, agree with the stall. And you also cry wolf that we
attacked Iraq after months of warnings to come clean.

No. I had no problem attacking Iraq if we had sufficient cause. At
the time I was willing to give the President the benefit of the doubt
since I did not have access to the same intelligence data. As it
turns out he lied and I'm not willing to give him the "benefit of the
doubt" when it leads to tens of thousands of deaths and especially
when he says mealy-mouthed things like we had "intelligence gathering
problems". You don't start a war unless you're absolutely sure.

> > More defense. You compared our president to Hitler favorably.

And

> > traitorously.
>
> No, I didn't.

No I Didn't No I Didn't No I Didn't Waaa waaa waaa again!

I simply said I wouldn't vote for either Bush or Hitler.

Thereby drawing a close analogy between the two. You're sick Dick.
Even if you try to dance around your position here, you're a sick
man. .

Only a fool such as you would draw that conclusion. Since you appear
to be stuck on this as a comparison then it appears what you're
really saying is that you WOULD vote for Hitler. Actually not too
surprising for a racist like you who's already advocated the
extermination of Muslims worldwide.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

So much for not responding ...

His notion that terrorists attack us because we are aggressor just
shows his lack of knowledge on the subject.

Statements like yours' shows your complete lack of knowledge. First,
of all you should realize that terrorists are created for a mulitude
of reasons. I mentioned our attack on Iraq. That is one, but
certainly not all. Our desertion of OBL, who was once our ally, is
another. The fact that we've supported gov'ts in the middle east that
suppress freedoms is yet another. But, instead of trying to fix the
roots causes you just want to nukeem.

The dune coons just killed one of the Netherlands most popular film
makers. Shot him in on the street and then and then tried to
decapitate him. The pacifist PC Dutch are now in an uproar and
demanding the Muslims be put out of the country. Amazing how you
change when you face the brutality of the religion of peace. As you
and I tried to explain to him it has nothing to do with our

position

or politics. Because we are non-muslims we are targets.
And I agree with you. The Nukes will fly and the sooner they make

the

middle East a glass parking lot the better.

While were at it I suppose we should flatten Korea as well. And, what
the heck why not take China with them, they all hate us too ... Hell,
for that matter, they hate us in Africa and South America as well so
let's fryem. Now, get me another bruski, all this intellectual stuff
is making me thirsty.

I'm surprised Russian hasn't nuked some part of Chechnya.
To hell with world opinion. The security of our people are at risk.
Too many of these countries have hidden under our military skirt

for

long enough (Canada a good example) When we need them they stick it
to us. Screw em!

More examples of someone who skipped all their History 101 courses
and now think they know it all.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "tghysel" <tghysel@y...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "bonuspokergod"
<bonuspokergod@y...> wrote:
But let us not forget the mourning our friend Dick must now be

going

through. Yesterday he sympathized with the Palestinian suicide
bombers, actually presenting a position amounting to how these

people

don't have a choice and have been persecuted for oh such a long

time!

Not my opinion, not even close. But it's pretty obvious that you and
Rob are one in the same. Your responses to your own posts is just
another example of how sick you've become.

Combine that with his belief that the terrorist attacks of 9-11

were

OUR fault,

OK. Explain to me how 9/11 would have happened if the CIA had not cut
off our covert funding of OBL, or, never funded him in the first
place. You don't have clue about anything the US has done around the
world.

and how it was wrong to attack Iraq when we should have
allowed the UN a few more years of inspections and when we could

have

sat down at the negotiation table to surrender to OBL for
our 'atrocities' - and don't forget how he feels about Israel's
mistreatment of the Palestinian mutations called Hamas and Islamic
Jihad - and you'll have a man beside himself today.

Ok. Let's have your INFORMED opinion of what created the terrorists.
Oh wait, it's part of the Koran. Yeah, right. You live such a
sheltered life, it's almost embarrassing to hear you spout off
rhetoric as fact when no clue whatsoever. Of course, that's the easy
way and it's pretty obvious that's the only way you know.

And you think your racist views will save the country? Just more
evidence of what a complete idiot you are.

Their racist to you because you support any entity or race that's
anti-American, and you loathe to hear the truth about them. Whether
they save the country or not is not mine to say. But I expect you
realize by now that it's the majority view--as proven by the election
that you chose to exercize your pacifist view not to vote.

If you had any brains at all you'd understand that neither the
liberals of the conservatives are always right. They are both
constantly looking of polical advantages and both will say whatever
it takes to garner an advantage. That is why you need to think for
yourself and I realize asking you to actually think borders on the
impossible.

Typical negative attitude towards your country--what else should we
expect from you? You believe you transcend all reason as delivered by
those far more intelligent and connected than you, yet you neither
vote nor have an alternative idea that you have ever CLEARLY stated.
It's the classic "let the other guy do it" lazy man syndrome.

> Your warped view again. All you feel good doing is criticizing

what is, and making believe you have a better plan like Kerry kept

saying without telling anyone what that is. You've criticized

everything that holds the country together, because you are not a
happy person.

It's so humerous to hear you pick on me for criticism. Criticism is
about all you ever post on this forum. It appears you can give it

but you can't take it. Get over it.

You criticize because you don't have anything upstairs, and you
apparently lead a sour life. I do it when common sense dictates the
need. BIG difference.

> Ridiculous? It describes you perfectly. You haven't been clear on
> anything other than your hatred of this country.

No, hatred is your dominion. Which you've made more than obvious.
This is the area that you should seek professional help. Do it

before it's too late!

Denial once again. Tell us, who wins arguments with your wife?--if
you even let her speak. You can't win here because you can't stifle,
can you.

Even when a WMD goes off here, your strategy is doomed to failure

and about as anti-American as it gets. If you were bit by a dog you
would promote the extermination of dogs worldwide.

You continue to show off your cowardice. Say it. You don't want us to
keep on the offensive even after an attack because you are afraid for
your pitiful life. And here's a flash. That strategy you limp away
from is on the table--only that table is occupied by real Americans
who love their freedom and country--something you hate about them.

Nope, that's not my way of thinking. Try again. You really need to
spend a little time to understand terrorism and get away from your
constant need for generalizations.

Again, no response other than I'm wrong. Each time you say that you
build my credibility, because just like Kerry's rhetoric, you never
say what you are for--just against.

> I'm actually torn between hoping it does and
> hoping it doesn't--just so I could watch people like you, Kerry,
> Kennedy, Moore, Sarandon and others squirm and lose their minds.

One more example of how sick you are.

It would easily cure my 'sickness' to watch you cry over your dead
friends & family after an attack that you chose to "simply talk it
over" with terrorists instead of exterminating them and their kind--
thereby saving everyone. If that's what it takes to teach sissy's
like you and Michael Moore a lesson, let it be.

> Once again, the UN wasted so much time with their token 'weapons
> inspections' by allowing Saddam to push them around, that he had
> plenty of time to send most of them to Syria, and he buried the
> remainder of them in the dirt.

One again you ignore all the facts. The sad thing is you really
believe this crap. It's obvious you maintain this belief in order

to maintain your warmongering attitude. It's your VP arguments all
over again. When presented with undeniable facts, you deny them.

I kind of think I'm the one who just laid out the facts, and all you
do, as usual, is say NO NO NO! Typical of queers, peacniks, and
hippies. Critical without reason.

> But you, with your anti-American
> sentiment, agree with the stall. And you also cry wolf that we
> attacked Iraq after months of warnings to come clean.

No. I had no problem attacking Iraq if we had sufficient cause. At
the time I was willing to give the President the benefit of the

doubt since I did not have access to the same intelligence data. As
it turns out he lied and I'm not willing to give him the "benefit of
the doubt" when it leads to tens of thousands of deaths and
especially when he says mealy-mouthed things like we
had "intelligence gathering problems". You don't start a war unless
you're absolutely sure.

Hello again, McFly! The war was because Saddam and Iraq's regime
supported terrorism and they did have Al Q. contact, just as much as
it was agains WMD's. The only lying going on now is by anti-American
people like you. And you have no idea as to what that intelligence
data says in its entirety. You only trust CBS for what you hear. I've
already told you the WMD's were shipped out and buried, but you could
never let that be true since your very weak "benefit of the doubt"
wouldn't work here. Plus--and this is what REALLY burns you--more
people agree with the President than agree with peacenik do-nothings
like you!

> I simply said I wouldn't vote for either Bush or Hitler.
>
> Thereby drawing a close analogy between the two. You're sick

Dick. Even if you try to dance around your position here, you're a
sick man.

Only a fool such as you would draw that conclusion. Since you

appear to be stuck on this as a comparison then it appears what
you're really saying is that you WOULD vote for Hitler. Actually not
too surprising for a racist like you who's already advocated the

extermination of Muslims worldwide.

You can't back out now Jack! If you're lucky, after Saddam and OBL
die, you can apply for the extra seat at the table they'll be sitting
at with your heroes Hitler & Arafat. Then maybe you'll finally get
the true stories from all of them, and you can finally ask Osama BL
to please stop all the attacks. Maybe even a 'pretty please' will
work.....

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

Statements like yours' shows your complete lack of knowledge.

First, of all you should realize that terrorists are created for a
mulitude of reasons. I mentioned our attack on Iraq.

Why don't you just come out and say it? It's all America's fault, we
deserve to be wiped out by them (which is what they wanted to do to
us LOOOONG before 9-11), and we get what we asked for. You're such a
coward and a USA hater.

While were at it I suppose we should flatten Korea as well. And,

what the heck why not take China with them, they all hate us too ...
Hell, for that matter, they hate us in Africa and South America as
well so let's fryem. Now, get me another bruski, all this
intellectual stuff is making me thirsty.

So dense..... They're not on a mission to destroy us. You liberals
will dig up anything that might make sense at one of your move-on.org
meetings, where you can fire each other up with cowardice and hippie
talk. But you're a failure here.

More examples of someone who skipped all their History 101 courses
and now think they know it all.

This time is the same as every time. Criticizm with no input as to
why someone is wrong. Just like Kerry. and the same reason he lost.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote: