Amateur lurker here:
I'd go with the higher payoff.
I figure I want the volatility anyway, if I'm sitting there hoping
for a Royal, right? Up to a point, anyway.
Could I play FPDW at 100.76% instead?
The whole idea, of which I really like Frank Kneeland's take,
is to get enough hands going to where you are in the long run.
So sure, I might only play a few hours at a time, but my
life is the 'long run' I am thinking about vs/ the machines.
···
--- On Tue, 8/30/11, TIMSPEED <corvetteracing87@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: TIMSPEED <corvetteracing87@yahoo.com>
Subject: [vpFREE_Reno] Variance vs Payback vs Comp: What would you do?
To: vpFREE_Reno@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2011, 6:59 PM
Would you rather play..
10/6/40 DDB with .300% comp
OR
9/6 JoB with .335% comp
I know DDB has a higher payback (at 99.95%) while JoB has a lower (with 99.54%)...but DDB has about double the variance (41.96) while JoB has 19.56...
But then again, the JoB comps a little better...
What would YOU do?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]