I think that $20/yr is fair considering the work involved keepin stuff up to date.
CK
Adams Myth <Adams_Myth@HotMail.Com> wrote: I think charging for a group like this is a bad idea. But that, of
course, is my opinion.
I would like to see how many of the 6000+ members would agree for a
membership fee (of course, it can't be Yahoo group anymore; right?) for
$20 an year; let alone a month.
I wish a poll were taken on the topic. Too bad I can't start it on my
own. If I could, I would ask how many would be willing to pay $5, $10,
$15, $20 an year for the privilege of belonging to the group.
Of course, once you start charging money, it would bring up a host of
problems along with it. Imagine managing a pool of money of the size
$20X6000! A pretty nice size bankroll!!
Let me just leavt it at that.
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, John Kelly <lodestone@...> wrote:
> Good idea. However, it is possible that if you start charging,
somebody would put together a similar website for free, thereby making
your pay-site superfluous. On the plus side, that would relieve the
webmaster of a thankless task and leave him more time to write
whimsical emails.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]