--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, vpFREE Administrator <vp_free@y...>
wrote:
> thymos_one wrote:
> > Rather than aiming all the vitriol at Rob Singer's "strategies"
> > why not point the spotlight on the professional writers who are
members
> > of this site, but, rarely if ever share their wealth of
information on
> > specific slot clubs. Just like dancer who points to entries in
the
> > database being outdated, but doesn't lift a finger to update the
> > database. Perhaps he should be barred, or the anonymous
administrator,
> > could stop promoting his columns until he adds updates to the
database.
> > It would also be nice to have Jean Scott add some useful
content,
rather
> > than just promoting her books and software...
>
> Bob Dancer gave vpFREE a gratuitous, accurate plug in his
> column, which I appreciate. He isn't a member of vpFREE
> and doesn't have an obligation to update the DataBase.
> Boycotting Dancer columns makes no sense to me.
What you say above may well be true, but how do you know he is not
a
member of the group, since the membership is largely anonymous,
including the moderator! right Bob...just kidding. It would be nice
if he would give something back to the community that has been good
for him by providing some pro bono database updates.
>Jean Scott is a vpFREE member and is a frequent and valuable
> poster. Her contributions to the video poker community are
> huge, and she was recently inducted into the vpFREE Hall of
> Fame.
>
> vpFREE Administrator
Perhaps you could highlight some of this huge contribution to this
board that I may have overlooked, selling books and software
doesn't
qualify in my estimation. I think Jean has benefited from this
board
far more than her contribution. Her books seem little more than a
distillation of topics from this board, just a bit outdated. This
is
in contrast to several frequent "volunteer" contributors on here. I
will give a few examples:
All contributors to the discussion of variance, even those whose
reasoning were slightly faulty, still contributed tremendously.
The person who posted his results of worst sessions by
denomination,
really gave a valuable hands on insight into the risk of loss.
The posting on point requirements on diamond in a day by casino.
I think have read so many interesting and useful posts by Harry
Porter, that I can't even list all of them.
For people to be saying that Dancer and Jean Scott do not contribute
enough to the VP community is appalling and insulting. Personally I
wouldn't even be aware of the VP world as we know it that has
provided me and many others in this group so many hours of
entertainment if it weren't for their influence. Is there anyone
here who is using a VP software program besides WinPoker or Frugal?
Therefore, we wouldn't even have the knowledge to play these games at
a decent level without Dancer or Scott. Sure there are charts that
can be studied, but computer practice is a must if you want to become
proficient. I'm sure someone else would have come along to write
some good software, but the fact is that they are the ones who have
done it and shown us how to make the most of the many great VP
opportunities out there. This post is not an attack on any one
individual on this board, but it seems that there is a lot of unjust
hostility toward Dancer and Scott and I just wanted to voice my
opinion that they don't deserve it.
Also, people are upset that Dancer and Scott don't reveal more good
opportunities to the board. Then when great opportunitiues are
revealed (such as the $1 FPDW at Wynn), people are upset that the cat
is out of the bag and also that people are playing these
opportunities too much. We can't have it both ways. I have no facts
that the same people are upset in both instances, but it just seems
odd to me. The point of this group is to help people and share ideas
and knowledge. There seems to be far too much hostility lately. VP
is fun people!!!
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "thymos_one" <thymos_one@y...> wrote: