vpFREE2 Forums

Truth, Disallusionment & Envy on vpFREE

From misscraps on vpFREE:

In 2004 I filed my tax return with "winning" and "losing sessions"

and the winning sessions were less than the amount of W2Gs. As per
Jean Scott's instructions.......

Uh-oh. There's her first mistake!

I do not file as Schedule C, for one thing I lose money gambling.

And then she so nicely makes up for it there. Now imagine the Queen-
-any 'optimal play expert' that depends on income from the trinkets
they sell, for that matter--telling the truth out in public like
this!! In fact, could anyone imagine the time it would take for
suicide to occur if little dicky was forced to tell the truth like
this, instead of writing about "26 royals", "I won $3200" and "I won
$1400"?! Talk about 'Oh My God's'.....!

I also just read the latest thread of Dancer-bashing. My my
my....what a jealous lot we are over there..... The fatties are at it
again. And the best part is he's the only one making sense! All
except for his endorsement of Harry as a columnist. One thing, it
would serve as a learning tool for those who have never understood
words longer than 8 characters. But whomever he writes for better set
aside the whole page! As much as I enjoy his posts, in starting to
read his column I'd be forced into doing what I did with the Queen's
latest monstrosity--quit after the first two paragraphs!

rsing1111 wrote:

All except for his endorsement of Harry as a columnist. One thing, it
would serve as a learning tool for those who have never understood
words longer than 8 characters. But whomever he writes for better set
aside the whole page! As much as I enjoy his posts, in starting to
read his column I'd be forced into doing what I did with the Queen's
latest monstrosity--quit after the first two paragraphs!

Rob, if it should ever come to that, I'll be sure to abstract and
outline for you (in brief sentences comprised of a few short words :slight_smile:

- H.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

From misscraps on vpFREE:

>In 2004 I filed my tax return with "winning" and "losing sessions"
and the winning sessions were less than the amount of W2Gs. As per
Jean Scott's instructions.......

Uh-oh. There's her first mistake!

Not surprising that you'd claim anyone telling the truth is making a
mistake.

>I do not file as Schedule C, for one thing I lose money gambling.

And then she so nicely makes up for it there. Now imagine the

Queen-

-any 'optimal play expert' that depends on income from the trinkets
they sell, for that matter--telling the truth out in public like
this!!

Rob, you stated previously that everyone lied about their VP results
on VPfree. Now, when someone, and far from the first one, states they
have lost, you claim it's the truth. Sorry, Biffy-boy, by accepting
ONLY the statements you like and disregarding those that don't fit
into your con, you make it so obvious.

In fact, could anyone imagine the time it would take for
suicide to occur if little dicky was forced to tell the truth like
this, instead of writing about "26 royals", "I won $3200" and "I

won

$1400"?! Talk about 'Oh My God's'.....!

Just the facts, as usual. I'm glad you remember them so well.
However, this appears to be an admission by Robs' inner voice that he
has been lying about at least some of his winning claims all along.
Anyone surprised?

I also just read the latest thread of Dancer-bashing. My my
my....what a jealous lot we are over there..... The fatties are at

it

again.

Are you referring to Bobs' claim of being 30 lbs overweight? In any
event, it's nice to see you sticking up for Bob, I'm sure that will
make his day.

And the best part is he's the only one making sense! All
except for his endorsement of Harry as a columnist.

Today, Bob makes sense, yesterday he was a false guru. Don't you EVER
stick with a position?

One thing, it
would serve as a learning tool for those who have never understood
words longer than 8 characters. But whomever he writes for better

set

aside the whole page! As much as I enjoy his posts, in starting to
read his column I'd be forced into doing what I did with the

Queen's

latest monstrosity--quit after the first two paragraphs!

You claim to despise them and yet, you read them all the time. Do I
detect a sense of jealousy/hypocracy ...

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
>
> From misscraps on vpFREE:
>
> >In 2004 I filed my tax return with "winning" and "losing

sessions" and the winning sessions were less than the amount of
W2Gs. As per Jean Scott's instructions.......

>
> Uh-oh. There's her first mistake!

Not surprising that you'd claim anyone telling the truth is making

a mistake.

HAHA! That's agood little one!! Your friend misscraps--whom I warned
BEFORE her over anxious and sweaty-palmed move to be closer to the
addict machines--that all she'd be doing if she insisted on the long-
term strategy 'crap', is giving away all her and hubby's hard-earned
and/or Gov't. issued money. So you're right. Listening to your
Queen's (and I LOVE this part!) "instructions" indeed was not her
first mistake.

> >I do not file as Schedule C, for one thing I lose money

gambling.

>
> And then she so nicely makes up for it there. Now imagine the
Queen--any 'optimal play expert' that depends on income from the

trinkets they sell, for that matter--telling the truth out in public
like this!!

Rob, you stated previously that everyone lied about their VP

results on VPfree. Now, when someone, and far from the first one,
states they have lost, you claim it's the truth.

Here's where you've never been able to separate fiction from
reality. Name your list of "far from the first one" who's claimed
they are an overall loser or says they've lost in the most recent
year. Some find it easy to say in passing "I had a losing trip" or
slip it in like you and the math geeks and gurus do "I've lost here
and there in the past, but I'm an overall winner" because they are
embarrassed with their trut results. And I've never said "everyone
loses". Every GURU loses as well as bozo players like you--barring
extreme luck....and it's the same for everyone who insists on
playing your goofy system.

Sorry, Biffy-boy, by accepting ONLY the statements you like and

disregarding those that don't fit into your con, you make it so
obvious.

What's obvious is how you come apart so easily at the seams whenever
you see you've been caught telling little dicky fibs.

> In fact, could anyone imagine the time it would take for
> suicide to occur if little dicky was forced to tell the truth

like this, instead of writing about "26 royals", "I won $3200"
and "I won $1400"?! Talk about 'Oh My God's'.....!

Just the facts, as usual. I'm glad you remember them so well.

That's part of why I have so many facts that irritate you.

However, this appears to be an admission by Robs' inner voice that

he has been lying about at least some of his winning claims all
along. Anyone surprised?

Admit it. You're perturbed by my winning because you can't get
yourself to disregard it. Your own inner-conflict over this is
eating away at you day after day.

>
> I also just read the latest thread of Dancer-bashing. My my
> my....what a jealous lot we are over there..... The fatties are

at it again.

Are you referring to Bobs' claim of being 30 lbs overweight? In

any event, it's nice to see you sticking up for Bob, I'm sure that
will make his day.

Is that all he is? From what I saw it's at least 50. But why not? He
spends as much time as you sitting at machines, and also calaims
to 'work out' much more than you make believe you do.

> And the best part is he's the only one making sense! All
> except for his endorsement of Harry as a columnist.

Today, Bob makes sense, yesterday he was a false guru. Don't you

EVER stick with a position?

Why? He's a slick operator, and most of the time he's very truthful.
What's phoney about him is exactly what you referred to: his expert-
play nonsense. Funny, that's the same ailment YOU have!

> One thing, it would serve as a learning tool for those who have

never understood words longer than 8 characters. But whomever he
writes for better set aside the whole page! As much as I enjoy his
posts, in starting to read his column I'd be forced into doing what
I did with the Queen's latest monstrosity--quit after the first two
paragraphs!

You claim to despise them and yet, you read them all the time. Do

I detect a sense of jealousy/hypocracy ...

Too late little dicky--you missed out again! A read a few paragraphs
of 'the monstrosity' then 86'd it right where it belongs. I just
can't wait for the new announcement of her new one! Maybe she's
gonna unveil it with Katy Couric!! HAHAHA!!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> >
> > From misscraps on vpFREE:
> >
> > >In 2004 I filed my tax return with "winning" and "losing
sessions" and the winning sessions were less than the amount of
W2Gs. As per Jean Scott's instructions.......
> >
> > Uh-oh. There's her first mistake!
>
> Not surprising that you'd claim anyone telling the truth is

making

a mistake.

HAHA! That's agood little one!! Your friend misscraps--whom I

warned

BEFORE her over anxious and sweaty-palmed move to be closer to the
addict machines--that all she'd be doing if she insisted on the

long-

term strategy 'crap', is giving away all her and hubby's hard-

earned

and/or Gov't. issued money. So you're right. Listening to your
Queen's (and I LOVE this part!) "instructions" indeed was not her
first mistake.

You avoided the issue. Once again, not surprising.

> > >I do not file as Schedule C, for one thing I lose money
gambling.
> >
> > And then she so nicely makes up for it there. Now imagine the
> Queen--any 'optimal play expert' that depends on income from the
trinkets they sell, for that matter--telling the truth out in

public

like this!!
>
> Rob, you stated previously that everyone lied about their VP
results on VPfree. Now, when someone, and far from the first one,
states they have lost, you claim it's the truth.

Here's where you've never been able to separate fiction from
reality. Name your list of "far from the first one" who's claimed
they are an overall loser or says they've lost in the most recent
year.

Check the VPfree polls where 81 out of 182 claimed they lost money in
2005. Is that enough? Rob, when one sticks to facts it's easy to
answer challenges like these. You should try it sometime.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?id=12224260

Some find it easy to say in passing "I had a losing trip" or
slip it in like you and the math geeks and gurus do "I've lost here
and there in the past, but I'm an overall winner" because they are
embarrassed with their trut results. And I've never said "everyone
loses". Every GURU loses

Lie.

as well as bozo players like you--barring
extreme luck....

Lie.

and it's the same for everyone who insists on
playing your goofy system.

First of all, it's not my "system". It's the mathematically proven
way to maximize your chances of winnng over time.

>Sorry, Biffy-boy, by accepting ONLY the statements you like and
disregarding those that don't fit into your con, you make it so
obvious.

What's obvious is how you come apart so easily at the seams

whenever

you see you've been caught telling little dicky fibs.

The inner voice speaks. It really is nice to see you admit it.

>
> > In fact, could anyone imagine the time it would take for
> > suicide to occur if little dicky was forced to tell the truth
like this, instead of writing about "26 royals", "I won $3200"
and "I won $1400"?! Talk about 'Oh My God's'.....!
>
> Just the facts, as usual. I'm glad you remember them so well.

That's part of why I have so many facts that irritate you.

If you think reminding me of my successful gambling history
would "irritate" me, then, please, keep it up. LMAO. By the way, I've
had 9 RFs so far this year, just to keep you up to date.

> However, this appears to be an admission by Robs' inner voice

that

he has been lying about at least some of his winning claims all
along. Anyone surprised?

Admit it. You're perturbed by my winning because you can't get
yourself to disregard it. Your own inner-conflict over this is
eating away at you day after day.

More of Robs' inner voice. Especially telling after Rob mentioned
some of my wins. These wins must really "perturb" the outer Rob.

>
> >
> > I also just read the latest thread of Dancer-bashing. My my
> > my....what a jealous lot we are over there..... The fatties are
at it again.
>
> Are you referring to Bobs' claim of being 30 lbs overweight? In
any event, it's nice to see you sticking up for Bob, I'm sure that
will make his day.

Is that all he is? From what I saw it's at least 50. But why not?
He
spends as much time as you sitting at machines, and also calaims
to 'work out' much more than you make believe you do.

You really should try to supress your jealousy of Bob. It makes all
of your arguments against AP meaningless.

> > And the best part is he's the only one making sense! All
> > except for his endorsement of Harry as a columnist.

> Today, Bob makes sense, yesterday he was a false guru. Don't you
EVER stick with a position?

Why? He's a slick operator, and most of the time he's very

truthful.

Rob admits to his lies.

What's phoney about him is exactly what you referred to: his expert-
play nonsense. Funny, that's the same ailment YOU have!

No, it's what makes you so jealous. Success, where you have failed.

> > One thing, it would serve as a learning tool for those who have
never understood words longer than 8 characters. But whomever he
writes for better set aside the whole page! As much as I enjoy his
posts, in starting to read his column I'd be forced into doing what
I did with the Queen's latest monstrosity--quit after the first two
paragraphs!

> You claim to despise them and yet, you read them all the time. Do
I detect a sense of jealousy/hypocracy ...

Too late little dicky--you missed out again! A read a few

paragraphs

of 'the monstrosity' then 86'd it right where it belongs. I just
can't wait for the new announcement of her new one! Maybe she's
gonna unveil it with Katy Couric!! HAHAHA!!!

Sorry, Biffy-boy, but you can't hide from the fact that you couldn't
wait to read the column. Jealousy is YOU.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > >
> > > From misscraps on vpFREE:
> > >
> > > >In 2004 I filed my tax return with "winning" and "losing
> sessions" and the winning sessions were less than the amount of
> W2Gs. As per Jean Scott's instructions.......
> > >
> > > Uh-oh. There's her first mistake!
> >
> > Not surprising that you'd claim anyone telling the truth is
making
> a mistake.
>
> HAHA! That's a good little one!! Your friend misscraps--whom I
warned
> BEFORE her over anxious and sweaty-palmed move to be closer to

the

> addict machines--that all she'd be doing if she insisted on the
long-
> term strategy 'crap', is giving away all her and hubby's hard-
earned
> and/or Gov't. issued money. So you're right. Listening to your
> Queen's (and I LOVE this part!) "instructions" indeed was not her
> first mistake.

You avoided the issue. Once again, not surprising.

Here's a flash---I brought the issue forward and it seems you're
again left speechless. Hmmm....Could it possibly be that little dicky
sees a little of himself in this loser's statements???

>
> > > >I do not file as Schedule C, for one thing I lose money
> gambling.
> > >
> > > And then she so nicely makes up for it there. Now imagine

the

> > Queen--any 'optimal play expert' that depends on income from

the

> trinkets they sell, for that matter--telling the truth out in
public
> like this!!
> >
> > Rob, you stated previously that everyone lied about their VP
> results on VPfree. Now, when someone, and far from the first one,
> states they have lost, you claim it's the truth.
>
> Here's where you've never been able to separate fiction from
> reality. Name your list of "far from the first one" who's claimed
> they are an overall loser or says they've lost in the most recent
> year.

Check the VPfree polls where 81 out of 182 claimed they lost money

in

2005. Is that enough? Rob, when one sticks to facts it's easy to
answer challenges like these. You should try it sometime.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?id=12224260

And leave it to you to believe a bunch of 5c players would have the
nerve to even anonymously type that they've lost! Only from a nerd....

> Some find it easy to say in passing "I had a losing trip" or
> slip it in like you and the math geeks and gurus do "I've lost

here

> and there in the past, but I'm an overall winner" because they

are

> embarrassed with their trut results. And I've never

said "everyone

> loses". Every GURU loses

Lie.

Denial. Get with modern times.

> as well as bozo players like you--barring
> extreme luck....

Lie.

Like I said, "Bozos"!

> and it's the same for everyone who insists on
> playing your goofy system.

First of all, it's not my "system". It's the mathematically proven
way to maximize your chances of winnng over time.

It's your system if you're stupid enough to follow it.

>
> >Sorry, Biffy-boy, by accepting ONLY the statements you like and
> disregarding those that don't fit into your con, you make it so
> obvious.
>
> What's obvious is how you come apart so easily at the seams
whenever
> you see you've been caught telling little dicky fibs.

The inner voice speaks. It really is nice to see you admit it.

It's saying "little dicky's been caught with his pants dowen again---
ooo ooo ooo, only this time it's not in the girl's gym in high
school"!

> >
> > > In fact, could anyone imagine the time it would take for
> > > suicide to occur if little dicky was forced to tell the truth
> like this, instead of writing about "26 royals", "I won $3200"
> and "I won $1400"?! Talk about 'Oh My God's'.....!
> >
> > Just the facts, as usual. I'm glad you remember them so well.
>
> That's part of why I have so many facts that irritate you.

If you think reminding me of my successful gambling history
would "irritate" me, then, please, keep it up. LMAO. By the way,

I've

had 9 RFs so far this year, just to keep you up to date.

HAHAHA! You're irritated every time I tell a truth about you and the
addict next to you. Oh BTW, I'll brag about only having ONE RF this
year---but I'm up over $33k. 3 quik trips with very little play--
completely the opposite of your pathological gambling trips back and
forth and back and forth. And I see you are behind, just like all the
losers who post the truth about losing after "winning" on vpFREE! You
must be soooo proud of yourself. And the missus---why she's so
excited she went out to celebrate by 'taking a shot' at the high-
limit DOLLAR machines!!

>
> > However, this appears to be an admission by Robs' inner voice
that
> he has been lying about at least some of his winning claims all
> along. Anyone surprised?
>
> Admit it. You're perturbed by my winning because you can't get
> yourself to disregard it. Your own inner-conflict over this is
> eating away at you day after day.

More of Robs' inner voice. Especially telling after Rob mentioned
some of my wins. These wins must really "perturb" the outer Rob.

I think this derailing you face here daily is good for you. Maybe,
because of the worry and embarrassment you live with, it's a way to
shed some of those fat-boy pounds you look so funny carrying around.
then you can lie to even more people and say how little you play
these days.

> >
> > >
> > > I also just read the latest thread of Dancer-bashing. My my
> > > my....what a jealous lot we are over there..... The fatties

are

> at it again.
> >
> > Are you referring to Bobs' claim of being 30 lbs overweight? In
> any event, it's nice to see you sticking up for Bob, I'm sure

that

> will make his day.
>
> Is that all he is? From what I saw it's at least 50. But why not?
> He
> spends as much time as you sitting at machines, and also claims
> to 'work out' much more than you make believe you do.

You really should try to supress your jealousy of Bob. It makes all
of your arguments against AP meaningless.

Yup. I sure do wish I was out of shape, needing to work 3 jobs to get
gambling money, and addicted to the same extent you are to vp. Wow--
what am I missing!!!

>
> > > And the best part is he's the only one making sense! All
> > > except for his endorsement of Harry as a columnist.
>
> > Today, Bob makes sense, yesterday he was a false guru. Don't

you

> EVER stick with a position?
>
> Why? He's a slick operator, and most of the time he's very
truthful.

Rob admits to his lies.

I admit to what makes sense. Which leaves you with nothing to respond
with.

> What's phoney about him is exactly what you referred to: his

expert-

> play nonsense. Funny, that's the same ailment YOU have!

No, it's what makes you so jealous. Success, where you have failed.

Kinda hurts when your weakness is exposed around here I've
noticed.....You oughta take care of that fault of yours.

>
> > > One thing, it would serve as a learning tool for those who

have

> never understood words longer than 8 characters. But whomever he
> writes for better set aside the whole page! As much as I enjoy

his

> posts, in starting to read his column I'd be forced into doing

what

> I did with the Queen's latest monstrosity--quit after the first

two

> paragraphs!
>
> > You claim to despise them and yet, you read them all the time.

Do

> I detect a sense of jealousy/hypocracy ...
>
> Too late little dicky--you missed out again! I read a few
paragraphs
> of 'the monstrosity' then 86'd it right where it belongs. I just
> can't wait for the new announcement of her new one! Maybe she's
> gonna unveil it with Katy Couric!! HAHAHA!!!

Sorry, Biffy-boy, but you can't hide from the fact that you

couldn't

wait to read the column. Jealousy is YOU.

Um, what column?? You see you're so rattled by me that you can't even
follow your own path--other than the one you've laid out with the
missus to destruction from gambling!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > From misscraps on vpFREE:
> > > >
> > > > >In 2004 I filed my tax return with "winning" and "losing
> > sessions" and the winning sessions were less than the amount of
> > W2Gs. As per Jean Scott's instructions.......
> > > >
> > > > Uh-oh. There's her first mistake!
> > >
> > > Not surprising that you'd claim anyone telling the truth is
> making
> > a mistake.
> >
> > HAHA! That's a good little one!! Your friend misscraps--whom I
> warned
> > BEFORE her over anxious and sweaty-palmed move to be closer to
the
> > addict machines--that all she'd be doing if she insisted on the
> long-
> > term strategy 'crap', is giving away all her and hubby's hard-
> earned
> > and/or Gov't. issued money. So you're right. Listening to your
> > Queen's (and I LOVE this part!) "instructions" indeed was not

her

> > first mistake.
>
> You avoided the issue. Once again, not surprising.

Here's a flash---I brought the issue forward and it seems you're
again left speechless.

Sorry, but the only issue here is you stating someone telling the
truth is a mistake. It's a clear indicator of your penchant for lying.

Hmmm....Could it possibly be that little dicky
sees a little of himself in this loser's statements???
>
> >
> > > > >I do not file as Schedule C, for one thing I lose money
> > gambling.
> > > >
> > > > And then she so nicely makes up for it there. Now imagine
the
> > > Queen--any 'optimal play expert' that depends on income from
the
> > trinkets they sell, for that matter--telling the truth out in
> public
> > like this!!
> > >
> > > Rob, you stated previously that everyone lied about their VP
> > results on VPfree. Now, when someone, and far from the first

one,

> > states they have lost, you claim it's the truth.
> >
> > Here's where you've never been able to separate fiction from
> > reality. Name your list of "far from the first one" who's

claimed

> > they are an overall loser or says they've lost in the most

recent

> > year.
>
> Check the VPfree polls where 81 out of 182 claimed they lost

money

in
> 2005. Is that enough? Rob, when one sticks to facts it's easy to
> answer challenges like these. You should try it sometime.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?id=12224260

And leave it to you to believe a bunch of 5c players would have the
nerve to even anonymously type that they've lost! Only from a

nerd....

Leave it to you to look foolish after being presented with the facts.

You know, I would have thought those losing up to $50K would take a
bit more than "nickel" play. LMAO.

>
> > Some find it easy to say in passing "I had a losing trip" or
> > slip it in like you and the math geeks and gurus do "I've lost
here
> > and there in the past, but I'm an overall winner" because they
are
> > embarrassed with their trut results. And I've never
said "everyone
> > loses". Every GURU loses
>
> Lie.

Denial. Get with modern times.

Your lies are old hat. My refutation of another one of your lies
above makes that all too clear.

>
> > as well as bozo players like you--barring
> > extreme luck....
>
> Lie.

Like I said, "Bozos"!

RIV.

>
> > and it's the same for everyone who insists on
> > playing your goofy system.
>
> First of all, it's not my "system". It's the mathematically

proven

> way to maximize your chances of winnng over time.

It's your system if you're stupid enough to follow it.

RIV. I think Robs' inner voice is commenting on those who would
choose to follow his progressive con system.

>
> >
> > >Sorry, Biffy-boy, by accepting ONLY the statements you like

and

···

> > disregarding those that don't fit into your con, you make it so
> > obvious.
> >
> > What's obvious is how you come apart so easily at the seams
> whenever
> > you see you've been caught telling little dicky fibs.
>
> The inner voice speaks. It really is nice to see you admit it.

It's saying "little dicky's been caught with his pants dowen again--

-

ooo ooo ooo, only this time it's not in the girl's gym in high
school"!

Same old babble. Same old loss for words.

>
> > >
> > > > In fact, could anyone imagine the time it would take for
> > > > suicide to occur if little dicky was forced to tell the

truth

> > like this, instead of writing about "26 royals", "I won $3200"
> > and "I won $1400"?! Talk about 'Oh My God's'.....!
> > >
> > > Just the facts, as usual. I'm glad you remember them so well.
> >
> > That's part of why I have so many facts that irritate you.
>
> If you think reminding me of my successful gambling history
> would "irritate" me, then, please, keep it up. LMAO. By the way,
I've
> had 9 RFs so far this year, just to keep you up to date.

HAHAHA! You're irritated every time I tell a truth about you and

the

addict next to you.

In your dreams. As everyone can easily tell by my logical replies,
your lies have no effect on me. I guess that is what frustrates you
so much and entertains the rest of us.

Oh BTW, I'll brag about only having ONE RF this
year---but I'm up over $33k. 3 quik trips with very little play--
completely the opposite of your pathological gambling trips back

and

forth and back and forth.

Hmmm. What happened to those win goals?

And I see you are behind,

Obvious LIE, since you have no way of knowing. However, to keep the
record straight, my wife and I are $8306 ahead.

just like all the
losers who post the truth about losing after "winning" on vpFREE!

A slight change in stories after being corrected by me.

You
must be soooo proud of yourself.

No, just business as usual.

And the missus---why she's so
excited she went out to celebrate by 'taking a shot' at the high-
limit DOLLAR machines!!

Nope, I sometimes play dollars and I play .50 quite often. She ONLY
plays quarters. Are you ever right?

>
> >
> > > However, this appears to be an admission by Robs' inner voice
> that
> > he has been lying about at least some of his winning claims all
> > along. Anyone surprised?
> >
> > Admit it. You're perturbed by my winning because you can't get
> > yourself to disregard it. Your own inner-conflict over this is
> > eating away at you day after day.
>
> More of Robs' inner voice. Especially telling after Rob mentioned
> some of my wins. These wins must really "perturb" the outer Rob.

I think this derailing you face here daily is good for you. Maybe,
because of the worry and embarrassment you live with, it's a way to
shed some of those fat-boy pounds you look so funny carrying

around.

then you can lie to even more people and say how little you play
these days.

The frustration must be escalating. The babbling is getting intense.

>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I also just read the latest thread of Dancer-bashing. My my
> > > > my....what a jealous lot we are over there..... The fatties
are
> > at it again.
> > >
> > > Are you referring to Bobs' claim of being 30 lbs overweight?

In

> > any event, it's nice to see you sticking up for Bob, I'm sure
that
> > will make his day.
> >
> > Is that all he is? From what I saw it's at least 50. But why

not?

> > He
> > spends as much time as you sitting at machines, and also claims
> > to 'work out' much more than you make believe you do.
>
> You really should try to supress your jealousy of Bob. It makes

all

> of your arguments against AP meaningless.

Yup. I sure do wish I was out of shape, needing to work 3 jobs to

get

gambling money, and addicted to the same extent you are to vp. Wow--
what am I missing!!!

Working for a living?

PARASITIC LIFESTYLE -- an intentional, manipulative, selfish, and
exploitative financial dependence on others as reflected in a lack of
motivation, low self-discipline, and inability to begin or complete
responsibilities.

>
> >
> > > > And the best part is he's the only one making sense! All
> > > > except for his endorsement of Harry as a columnist.
> >
> > > Today, Bob makes sense, yesterday he was a false guru. Don't
you
> > EVER stick with a position?
> >
> > Why? He's a slick operator, and most of the time he's very
> truthful.
>
> Rob admits to his lies.

I admit to what makes sense. Which leaves you with nothing to

respond

with.

I had no problem pointing out your admission of guilt. Previously you
have stated many times that you ALWAYS tell the truth. Now, you admit
that lying is just fine with you.

>
> > What's phoney about him is exactly what you referred to: his
expert-
> > play nonsense. Funny, that's the same ailment YOU have!
>
> No, it's what makes you so jealous. Success, where you have

failed.

Kinda hurts when your weakness is exposed around here I've
noticed.....You oughta take care of that fault of yours.

RIV. Yes, Rob, I undertand you "hurt". Get help.

>
> >
> > > > One thing, it would serve as a learning tool for those who
have
> > never understood words longer than 8 characters. But whomever

he

> > writes for better set aside the whole page! As much as I enjoy
his
> > posts, in starting to read his column I'd be forced into doing
what
> > I did with the Queen's latest monstrosity--quit after the first
two
> > paragraphs!
> >
> > > You claim to despise them and yet, you read them all the

time.

Do
> > I detect a sense of jealousy/hypocracy ...
> >
> > Too late little dicky--you missed out again! I read a few
> paragraphs
> > of 'the monstrosity' then 86'd it right where it belongs. I

just

> > can't wait for the new announcement of her new one! Maybe she's
> > gonna unveil it with Katy Couric!! HAHAHA!!!
>
> Sorry, Biffy-boy, but you can't hide from the fact that you
couldn't
> wait to read the column. Jealousy is YOU.

Um, what column??

You said. "in starting to read his column I'd be forced into doing
what I did with the Queen's latest monstrosity--quit after the first
two paragraphs!". If you did not mean you started reading her column
than I would suggest you not claim that you did.

You see you're so rattled by me that you can't even
follow your own path--other than the one you've laid out with the
missus to destruction from gambling!

LMAO. It's pretty obvious who's really "rattled" here.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > > From misscraps on vpFREE:
> > > > >
> > > > > >In 2004 I filed my tax return with "winning" and "losing
> > > sessions" and the winning sessions were less than the amount

of

> > > W2Gs. As per Jean Scott's instructions.......
> > > > >
> > > > > Uh-oh. There's her first mistake!
> > > >
> > > > Not surprising that you'd claim anyone telling the truth is
> > making
> > > a mistake.
> > >
> > > HAHA! That's a good little one!! Your friend misscraps--whom

I

> > warned
> > > BEFORE her over anxious and sweaty-palmed move to be closer

to

> the
> > > addict machines--that all she'd be doing if she insisted on

the

> > long-
> > > term strategy 'crap', is giving away all her and hubby's hard-
> > earned
> > > and/or Gov't. issued money. So you're right. Listening to

your

> > > Queen's (and I LOVE this part!) "instructions" indeed was not
her
> > > first mistake.
> >
> > You avoided the issue. Once again, not surprising.
>
> Here's a flash---I brought the issue forward and it seems you're
> again left speechless.

Sorry, but the only issue here is you stating someone telling the
truth is a mistake. It's a clear indicator of your penchant for

lying.

Then you missed another one....zzziiinnnnggggg.......! misscraps made
a mistake -- and apparently a BIG, irritable one - in following your
heroes 'instructions'. That's the only truth I've seen here. Of
course you'll defend both of them because you're just like both of
them--gambling addicts.

> Hmmm....Could it possibly be that little dicky
> sees a little of himself in this loser's statements???
> >
> > >
> > > > > >I do not file as Schedule C, for one thing I lose money
> > > gambling.
> > > > >
> > > > > And then she so nicely makes up for it there. Now

imagine

> the
> > > > Queen--any 'optimal play expert' that depends on income

from

> the
> > > trinkets they sell, for that matter--telling the truth out in
> > public
> > > like this!!
> > > >
> > > > Rob, you stated previously that everyone lied about their

VP

> > > results on VPfree. Now, when someone, and far from the first
one,
> > > states they have lost, you claim it's the truth.
> > >
> > > Here's where you've never been able to separate fiction from
> > > reality. Name your list of "far from the first one" who's
claimed
> > > they are an overall loser or says they've lost in the most
recent
> > > year.
> >
> > Check the VPfree polls where 81 out of 182 claimed they lost
money
> in
> > 2005. Is that enough? Rob, when one sticks to facts it's easy

to

> > answer challenges like these. You should try it sometime.
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?id=12224260
>
> And leave it to you to believe a bunch of 5c players would have

the

> nerve to even anonymously type that they've lost! Only from a
nerd....

Leave it to you to look foolish after being presented with the

facts.

then show me the facts--along with supporting documentation that they
in fact have won! You see, in my working career I constantly went
after people like you to support their assertions on specifications,
stress limits, failure analysis, and reliability claims until they
showed me absolute proof or non-arguable analysis that they indeed
were correct. Most of them were, and the few who weren't were the
repeat offenders and were eventually walked out. YOU remind me of
those phonies. You touch on a claim and then ramble on with opinion
that's never supported with anything. You just don't fit in here.

You know, I would have thought those losing up to $50K would take a
bit more than "nickel" play. LMAO.

??? So would anyone!

> >
> > > Some find it easy to say in passing "I had a losing trip" or
> > > slip it in like you and the math geeks and gurus do "I've

lost

> here
> > > and there in the past, but I'm an overall winner" because

they

> are
> > > embarrassed with their trut results. And I've never
> said "everyone
> > > loses". Every GURU loses
> >
> > Lie.
>
> Denial. Get with modern times.

Your lies are old hat. My refutation of another one of your lies
above makes that all too clear.

Every guru loses. Prove me wrong. Let's see it. Or will you take your
escape route of 'lie' again!!

> >
> > > as well as bozo players like you--barring
> > > extreme luck....
> >
> > Lie.
>
> Like I said, "Bozos"!

RIV.

RIP.

> >
> > > and it's the same for everyone who insists on
> > > playing your goofy system.
> >
> > First of all, it's not my "system". It's the mathematically
proven
> > way to maximize your chances of winnng over time.
>
> It's your system if you're stupid enough to follow it.

RIV. I think Robs' inner voice is commenting on those who would
choose to follow his progressive con system.

Another loss for wording. That's OK. Keep using your goofy system and
soon you'll have 90 royals!

> >
> > >
> > > >Sorry, Biffy-boy, by accepting ONLY the statements you like
and
> > > disregarding those that don't fit into your con, you make it

so

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

> > > obvious.
> > >
> > > What's obvious is how you come apart so easily at the seams
> > whenever
> > > you see you've been caught telling little dicky fibs.
> >
> > The inner voice speaks. It really is nice to see you admit it.
>
> It's saying "little dicky's been caught with his pants down again-

-

-
> ooo ooo ooo, only this time it's not in the girl's gym in high
> school"!

Same old babble. Same old loss for words.

And same old ridicule of a nerd!

> >
> > > >
> > > > > In fact, could anyone imagine the time it would take for
> > > > > suicide to occur if little dicky was forced to tell the
truth
> > > like this, instead of writing about "26 royals", "I won

$3200"

> > > and "I won $1400"?! Talk about 'Oh My God's'.....!
> > > >
> > > > Just the facts, as usual. I'm glad you remember them so

well.

> > >
> > > That's part of why I have so many facts that irritate you.
> >
> > If you think reminding me of my successful gambling history
> > would "irritate" me, then, please, keep it up. LMAO. By the

way,

> I've
> > had 9 RFs so far this year, just to keep you up to date.
>
> HAHAHA! You're irritated every time I tell a truth about you and
the addict next to you.

In your dreams. As everyone can easily tell by my logical replies,
your lies have no effect on me. I guess that is what frustrates you
so much and entertains the rest of us.

HAHAHA!! No effect?? HAHA! The fact you have such a neurosis to 'set
the record straight' correlates to you being bothered by my every
word. I tingle over your agony.......

> Oh BTW, I'll brag about only having ONE RF this
> year---but I'm up over $33k. 3 quik trips with very little play--
> completely the opposite of your pathological gambling trips back
and
> forth and back and forth.

Hmmm. What happened to those win goals?

Hit all 3 times. Doesn't that just BURN you!?

> And I see you are behind,

Obvious LIE, since you have no way of knowing. However, to keep the
record straight, my wife and I are $8306 ahead.

Yup! Just like the Queen and her live-in ol lover and Dancer and his
transformed wife, you guys all follow the same path of lies and
deception. One way to tell a nervous record report is in how the
defendant incorporates another person into the formula. You people
have so little self-confidence in what you're lying about that you
need the comfort on mentioning another person along with your lie.
Transparent as a surfboy wearing baggies on the beach.....

> And the missus---why she's so
> excited she went out to celebrate by 'taking a shot' at the high-
> limit DOLLAR machines!!

Nope, I sometimes play dollars and I play .50 quite often. She ONLY
plays quarters. Are you ever right?

Yes, and you're lying. She's a Dancer fan and everyone knows he plays
waaaay beyond his bankroll. You two are the epitome of that disease.

> >
> > >
> > > > However, this appears to be an admission by Robs' inner

voice

> > that
> > > he has been lying about at least some of his winning claims

all

> > > along. Anyone surprised?
> > >
> > > Admit it. You're perturbed by my winning because you can't

get

> > > yourself to disregard it. Your own inner-conflict over this

is

> > > eating away at you day after day.
> >
> > More of Robs' inner voice. Especially telling after Rob

mentioned

> > some of my wins. These wins must really "perturb" the outer Rob.
>
> I think this derailing you face here daily is good for you.

Maybe,

> because of the worry and embarrassment you live with, it's a way

to

> shed some of those fat-boy pounds you look so funny carrying
around.
> then you can lie to even more people and say how little you play
> these days.

The frustration must be escalating. The babbling is getting intense.

I know. Doesn't the truth hurt??!

> >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I also just read the latest thread of Dancer-bashing. My

my

> > > > > my....what a jealous lot we are over there..... The

fatties

> are
> > > at it again.
> > > >
> > > > Are you referring to Bobs' claim of being 30 lbs

overweight?

In
> > > any event, it's nice to see you sticking up for Bob, I'm sure
> that
> > > will make his day.
> > >
> > > Is that all he is? From what I saw it's at least 50. But why
not?
> > > He
> > > spends as much time as you sitting at machines, and also

claims

> > > to 'work out' much more than you make believe you do.
> >
> > You really should try to supress your jealousy of Bob. It makes
all
> > of your arguments against AP meaningless.
>
> Yup. I sure do wish I was out of shape, needing to work 3 jobs to
get
> gambling money, and addicted to the same extent you are to vp.

Wow--

> what am I missing!!!

Working for a living?

Are you asking me??

PARASITIC LIFESTYLE -- an intentional, manipulative, selfish, and
exploitative financial dependence on others as reflected in a lack

of

motivation, low self-discipline, and inability to begin or complete
responsibilities.

> >
> > >
> > > > > And the best part is he's the only one making sense! All
> > > > > except for his endorsement of Harry as a columnist.
> > >
> > > > Today, Bob makes sense, yesterday he was a false guru.

Don't

> you
> > > EVER stick with a position?
> > >
> > > Why? He's a slick operator, and most of the time he's very
> > truthful.
> >
> > Rob admits to his lies.
>
> I admit to what makes sense. Which leaves you with nothing to
respond
> with.

I had no problem pointing out your admission of guilt. Previously

you

have stated many times that you ALWAYS tell the truth. Now, you

admit

that lying is just fine with you.

Who cares if he lies? I simply expose it and people listen. I know
you ramble on with your long, unreadable and poorly written posts
over on vpFREE when he lies. But all he does is come back and make
you look stupid anyway--every time.

> >
> > > What's phoney about him is exactly what you referred to: his
> expert-
> > > play nonsense. Funny, that's the same ailment YOU have!
> >
> > No, it's what makes you so jealous. Success, where you have
failed.
>
> Kinda hurts when your weakness is exposed around here I've
> noticed.....You oughta take care of that fault of yours.

RIV. Yes, Rob, I undertand you "hurt". Get help.

When at a loss for words, repeat what the master just said!

> >
> > >
> > > > > One thing, it would serve as a learning tool for those

who

> have
> > > never understood words longer than 8 characters. But whomever
he
> > > writes for better set aside the whole page! As much as I

enjoy

> his
> > > posts, in starting to read his column I'd be forced into

doing

> what
> > > I did with the Queen's latest monstrosity--quit after the

first

> two
> > > paragraphs!
> > >
> > > > You claim to despise them and yet, you read them all the
time.
> Do
> > > I detect a sense of jealousy/hypocracy ...
> > >
> > > Too late little dicky--you missed out again! I read a few
> > paragraphs
> > > of 'the monstrosity' then 86'd it right where it belongs. I
just
> > > can't wait for the new announcement of her new one! Maybe

she's

> > > gonna unveil it with Katy Couric!! HAHAHA!!!
> >
> > Sorry, Biffy-boy, but you can't hide from the fact that you
> couldn't
> > wait to read the column. Jealousy is YOU.
>
> Um, what column??

You said. "in starting to read his column I'd be forced into doing
what I did with the Queen's latest monstrosity--quit after the

first

two paragraphs!". If you did not mean you started reading her

column

than I would suggest you not claim that you did.

I read everyone's columns--that's where I get the BS for my expose's!
But the books are another story. Dancer's are interesting. Your
Queen's--and especially your hero idol Paymar's
numerical/boring/repititious nonsense--is worthy of only the trash
bin.

> You see you're so rattled by me that you can't even
> follow your own path--other than the one you've laid out with the
> missus to destruction from gambling!

LMAO. It's pretty obvious who's really "rattled" here.

When at a loss for words, repeat what the master has said!!

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > > > From misscraps on vpFREE:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >In 2004 I filed my tax return with "winning"

and "losing

> > > > sessions" and the winning sessions were less than the

amount

of
> > > > W2Gs. As per Jean Scott's instructions.......
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Uh-oh. There's her first mistake!
> > > > >
> > > > > Not surprising that you'd claim anyone telling the truth

is

> > > making
> > > > a mistake.
> > > >
> > > > HAHA! That's a good little one!! Your friend misscraps--

whom

I
> > > warned
> > > > BEFORE her over anxious and sweaty-palmed move to be closer
to
> > the
> > > > addict machines--that all she'd be doing if she insisted on
the
> > > long-
> > > > term strategy 'crap', is giving away all her and hubby's

hard-

> > > earned
> > > > and/or Gov't. issued money. So you're right. Listening to
your
> > > > Queen's (and I LOVE this part!) "instructions" indeed was

not

> her
> > > > first mistake.
> > >
> > > You avoided the issue. Once again, not surprising.
> >
> > Here's a flash---I brought the issue forward and it seems

you're

> > again left speechless.
>
> Sorry, but the only issue here is you stating someone telling the
> truth is a mistake. It's a clear indicator of your penchant for
lying.

Then you missed another one....zzziiinnnnggggg.......! misscraps

made

a mistake -- and apparently a BIG, irritable one - in following

your

heroes 'instructions'.

I don't think that has yet been determined. The IRS only asked for
clarification. So, not an issue. We're back to your lies as the only
issue.

> > Hmmm....Could it possibly be that little dicky
> > sees a little of himself in this loser's statements???
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > >I do not file as Schedule C, for one thing I lose

money

> > > > gambling.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And then she so nicely makes up for it there. Now
imagine
> > the
> > > > > Queen--any 'optimal play expert' that depends on income
from
> > the
> > > > trinkets they sell, for that matter--telling the truth out

in

> > > public
> > > > like this!!
> > > > >
> > > > > Rob, you stated previously that everyone lied about their
VP
> > > > results on VPfree. Now, when someone, and far from the

first

> one,
> > > > states they have lost, you claim it's the truth.
> > > >
> > > > Here's where you've never been able to separate fiction

from

> > > > reality. Name your list of "far from the first one" who's
> claimed
> > > > they are an overall loser or says they've lost in the most
> recent
> > > > year.
> > >
> > > Check the VPfree polls where 81 out of 182 claimed they lost
> money
> > in
> > > 2005. Is that enough? Rob, when one sticks to facts it's easy
to
> > > answer challenges like these. You should try it sometime.
> > >
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?id=12224260
> >
> > And leave it to you to believe a bunch of 5c players would have
the
> > nerve to even anonymously type that they've lost! Only from a
> nerd....
>
> Leave it to you to look foolish after being presented with the
facts.

then show me the facts--along with supporting documentation that

they

in fact have won!

Have you completely lost it? The "fact" was that 81 admitted they had
lost after your continual claims that no one admits they lose.

You see, in my working career I constantly went
after people like you to support their assertions on

specifications,

I believe "working career" would be considered an oxymoron in your
case. I also suspect this is your inner voice telling us exactly why
you had to move from job to job.

stress limits, failure analysis, and reliability claims until they
showed me absolute proof or non-arguable analysis that they indeed
were correct. Most of them were, and the few who weren't were the
repeat offenders and were eventually walked out. YOU remind me of
those phonies. You touch on a claim and then ramble on with opinion
that's never supported with anything. You just don't fit in here.

LMAO. This babbling continues.

>
> You know, I would have thought those losing up to $50K would take

a

> bit more than "nickel" play. LMAO.

??? So would anyone!

Aparently not you. Why did you say "bunch of 5c players"?

>
> > >
> > > > Some find it easy to say in passing "I had a losing trip"

or

> > > > slip it in like you and the math geeks and gurus do "I've
lost
> > here
> > > > and there in the past, but I'm an overall winner" because
they
> > are
> > > > embarrassed with their trut results. And I've never
> > said "everyone
> > > > loses". Every GURU loses
> > >
> > > Lie.
> >
> > Denial. Get with modern times.
>
> Your lies are old hat. My refutation of another one of your lies
> above makes that all too clear.

Every guru loses. Prove me wrong. Let's see it. Or will you take

your

escape route of 'lie' again!!

That's not the issue. The issue is your claim that no one on VPfree
ever admits they lose. I proved you wrong. What more can I say.

>
> > >
> > > > as well as bozo players like you--barring
> > > > extreme luck....
> > >
> > > Lie.
> >
> > Like I said, "Bozos"!
>
> RIV.

RIP.

OK, we could call it Robs' inner pest. We all know how it irrates him.

>
> > >
> > > > and it's the same for everyone who insists on
> > > > playing your goofy system.
> > >
> > > First of all, it's not my "system". It's the mathematically
> proven
> > > way to maximize your chances of winnng over time.
> >
> > It's your system if you're stupid enough to follow it.
>
> RIV. I think Robs' inner voice is commenting on those who would
> choose to follow his progressive con system.

Another loss for wording. That's OK. Keep using your goofy system

and

soon you'll have 90 royals!

Don't worry, I will. PS. I've already had more than 90 royals.

>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >Sorry, Biffy-boy, by accepting ONLY the statements you

like

> and
> > > > disregarding those that don't fit into your con, you make

it

so
> > > > obvious.
> > > >
> > > > What's obvious is how you come apart so easily at the seams
> > > whenever
> > > > you see you've been caught telling little dicky fibs.
> > >
> > > The inner voice speaks. It really is nice to see you admit it.
> >
> > It's saying "little dicky's been caught with his pants down

again-

-
> -
> > ooo ooo ooo, only this time it's not in the girl's gym in high
> > school"!
>
> Same old babble. Same old loss for words.

And same old ridicule of a nerd!

I'm glad you admitted your lies are "old". Thanks.

>
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > In fact, could anyone imagine the time it would take

for

> > > > > > suicide to occur if little dicky was forced to tell the
> truth
> > > > like this, instead of writing about "26 royals", "I won
$3200"
> > > > and "I won $1400"?! Talk about 'Oh My God's'.....!
> > > > >
> > > > > Just the facts, as usual. I'm glad you remember them so
well.
> > > >
> > > > That's part of why I have so many facts that irritate you.
> > >
> > > If you think reminding me of my successful gambling history
> > > would "irritate" me, then, please, keep it up. LMAO. By the
way,
> > I've
> > > had 9 RFs so far this year, just to keep you up to date.
> >
> > HAHAHA! You're irritated every time I tell a truth about you

and

> the addict next to you.
>
> In your dreams. As everyone can easily tell by my logical

replies,

> your lies have no effect on me. I guess that is what frustrates

you

> so much and entertains the rest of us.

HAHAHA!! No effect?? HAHA! The fact you have such a neurosis

to 'set

the record straight' correlates to you being bothered by my every
word. I tingle over your agony.......

LMAO. Once again the inner voice is loud and clear.

···

>
> > Oh BTW, I'll brag about only having ONE RF this
> > year---but I'm up over $33k. 3 quik trips with very little play-

-

> > completely the opposite of your pathological gambling trips

back

> and
> > forth and back and forth.
>
> Hmmm. What happened to those win goals?

Hit all 3 times. Doesn't that just BURN you!?

$2500*3 = $7500. $33K and $7.5K are miles apart even with one RF.
Now, would little Robbie lie to us? LMAO.

>
> > And I see you are behind,
>
> Obvious LIE, since you have no way of knowing. However, to keep

the

> record straight, my wife and I are $8306 ahead.

Yup! Just like the Queen and her live-in ol lover and Dancer and

his

transformed wife, you guys all follow the same path of lies and
deception.

Just the facts, as usual.

One way to tell a nervous record report is in how the
defendant incorporates another person into the formula. You people
have so little self-confidence in what you're lying about that you
need the comfort on mentioning another person along with your lie.
Transparent as a surfboy wearing baggies on the beach.....

No, I could break it down for you but I just grabbed the total. As it
turns out were both ahead about the same.

>
> > And the missus---why she's so
> > excited she went out to celebrate by 'taking a shot' at the

high-

> > limit DOLLAR machines!!
>
> Nope, I sometimes play dollars and I play .50 quite often. She

ONLY

> plays quarters. Are you ever right?

Yes, and you're lying. She's a Dancer fan and everyone knows he

plays

waaaay beyond his bankroll. You two are the epitome of that disease.

No, she dislikes Dancer. Are you ever right?

>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > However, this appears to be an admission by Robs' inner
voice
> > > that
> > > > he has been lying about at least some of his winning claims
all
> > > > along. Anyone surprised?
> > > >
> > > > Admit it. You're perturbed by my winning because you can't
get
> > > > yourself to disregard it. Your own inner-conflict over this
is
> > > > eating away at you day after day.
> > >
> > > More of Robs' inner voice. Especially telling after Rob
mentioned
> > > some of my wins. These wins must really "perturb" the outer

Rob.

> >
> > I think this derailing you face here daily is good for you.
Maybe,
> > because of the worry and embarrassment you live with, it's a

way

to
> > shed some of those fat-boy pounds you look so funny carrying
> around.
> > then you can lie to even more people and say how little you

play

> > these days.
>
> The frustration must be escalating. The babbling is getting

intense.

I know. Doesn't the truth hurt??!

RIV or RIP, take your pick.

>
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I also just read the latest thread of Dancer-bashing.

My

my
> > > > > > my....what a jealous lot we are over there..... The
fatties
> > are
> > > > at it again.
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you referring to Bobs' claim of being 30 lbs
overweight?
> In
> > > > any event, it's nice to see you sticking up for Bob, I'm

sure

> > that
> > > > will make his day.
> > > >
> > > > Is that all he is? From what I saw it's at least 50. But

why

> not?
> > > > He
> > > > spends as much time as you sitting at machines, and also
claims
> > > > to 'work out' much more than you make believe you do.
> > >
> > > You really should try to supress your jealousy of Bob. It

makes

> all
> > > of your arguments against AP meaningless.
> >
> > Yup. I sure do wish I was out of shape, needing to work 3 jobs

to

> get
> > gambling money, and addicted to the same extent you are to vp.
Wow--
> > what am I missing!!!
>
> Working for a living?

Are you asking me??

No, stating a longterm fact.

>
> PARASITIC LIFESTYLE -- an intentional, manipulative, selfish, and
> exploitative financial dependence on others as reflected in a

lack

of
> motivation, low self-discipline, and inability to begin or

complete

> responsibilities.
>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > And the best part is he's the only one making sense!

All

> > > > > > except for his endorsement of Harry as a columnist.
> > > >
> > > > > Today, Bob makes sense, yesterday he was a false guru.
Don't
> > you
> > > > EVER stick with a position?
> > > >
> > > > Why? He's a slick operator, and most of the time he's very
> > > truthful.
> > >
> > > Rob admits to his lies.
> >
> > I admit to what makes sense. Which leaves you with nothing to
> respond
> > with.
>
> I had no problem pointing out your admission of guilt. Previously
you
> have stated many times that you ALWAYS tell the truth. Now, you
admit
> that lying is just fine with you.

Who cares if he lies?

LMAO. Keep backpedaling.

I simply expose it and people listen. I know
you ramble on with your long, unreadable and poorly written posts
over on vpFREE when he lies. But all he does is come back and make
you look stupid anyway--every time.

Sure he does. Click your heels together 3 times and say it again.

>
> > >
> > > > What's phoney about him is exactly what you referred to:

his

> > expert-
> > > > play nonsense. Funny, that's the same ailment YOU have!
> > >
> > > No, it's what makes you so jealous. Success, where you have
> failed.
> >
> > Kinda hurts when your weakness is exposed around here I've
> > noticed.....You oughta take care of that fault of yours.
>
> RIV. Yes, Rob, I undertand you "hurt". Get help.

When at a loss for words, repeat what the master just said!

No "loss" as evidenced by the 8 words and one acronym I typed. Just
pointing out your inner voices' concern. Get help.

>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > One thing, it would serve as a learning tool for those
who
> > have
> > > > never understood words longer than 8 characters. But

whomever

> he
> > > > writes for better set aside the whole page! As much as I
enjoy
> > his
> > > > posts, in starting to read his column I'd be forced into
doing
> > what
> > > > I did with the Queen's latest monstrosity--quit after the
first
> > two
> > > > paragraphs!
> > > >
> > > > > You claim to despise them and yet, you read them all the
> time.
> > Do
> > > > I detect a sense of jealousy/hypocracy ...
> > > >
> > > > Too late little dicky--you missed out again! I read a few
> > > paragraphs
> > > > of 'the monstrosity' then 86'd it right where it belongs. I
> just
> > > > can't wait for the new announcement of her new one! Maybe
she's
> > > > gonna unveil it with Katy Couric!! HAHAHA!!!
> > >
> > > Sorry, Biffy-boy, but you can't hide from the fact that you
> > couldn't
> > > wait to read the column. Jealousy is YOU.
> >
> > Um, what column??
>
> You said. "in starting to read his column I'd be forced into

doing

> what I did with the Queen's latest monstrosity--quit after the
first
> two paragraphs!". If you did not mean you started reading her
column
> than I would suggest you not claim that you did.

I read everyone's columns--that's where I get the BS for my

expose's!

Then why did you lie about it?

But the books are another story. Dancer's are interesting. Your
Queen's--and especially your hero idol Paymar's
numerical/boring/repititious nonsense--is worthy of only the trash
bin.

And you think they care what you think? LMAO.

>
> > You see you're so rattled by me that you can't even
> > follow your own path--other than the one you've laid out with

the

> > missus to destruction from gambling!
>
> LMAO. It's pretty obvious who's really "rattled" here.

When at a loss for words, repeat what the master has said!!

This time it's 7 words and another acronym. Are you ever right?

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > > > > From misscraps on vpFREE:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >In 2004 I filed my tax return with "winning"
and "losing
> > > > > sessions" and the winning sessions were less than the
amount
> of
> > > > > W2Gs. As per Jean Scott's instructions.......
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Uh-oh. There's her first mistake!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not surprising that you'd claim anyone telling the

truth is making a mistake.

> > > > >
> > > > > HAHA! That's a good little one!! Your friend misscraps--
whom I warned BEFORE her over anxious and sweaty-palmed move to be

closer to the addict machines--that all she'd be doing if she
insisted on the long-term strategy 'crap', is giving away all her and
hubby's hard-earned and/or Gov't. issued money. So you're right.
Listening to your Queen's (and I LOVE this part!) "instructions"
indeed was not her first mistake.

> > > >
> > > > You avoided the issue. Once again, not surprising.
> > >
> > > Here's a flash---I brought the issue forward and it seems
you're again left speechless.
> >
> > Sorry, but the only issue here is you stating someone telling

the truth is a mistake. It's a clear indicator of your penchant for

> lying.
>
> Then you missed another one....zzziiinnnnggggg.......! misscraps
made a mistake -- and apparently a BIG, irritable one - in

following your heroes 'instructions'.

I don't think that has yet been determined. The IRS only asked for
clarification. So, not an issue. We're back to your lies as the

only issue.

You thinking is another in a long line of the mistakes YOU'VE made
since you've allowed gambling to surse the lives of you & the missus.
Obviously, not an issue to you because you're not walking in her
shoes. She's rightfully concerned, and the reason is crystal clear.
If they go after more money from her and her husband that she likely
sneaks money from at every turn, she won't have much to gamble with
any more. Now just THINK of the position a scenario like that would
put YOU into! Pathological gambling addicts don't respond well to not
having cash around any longer. That's her true concern.

> > > > > > > >I do not file as Schedule C, for one thing I lose
money
> > > > > gambling.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And then she so nicely makes up for it there. Now
> imagine
> > > the
> > > > > > Queen--any 'optimal play expert' that depends on income
> from
> > > the
> > > > > trinkets they sell, for that matter--telling the truth

out

in
> > > > public
> > > > > like this!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rob, you stated previously that everyone lied about

their

> VP
> > > > > results on VPfree. Now, when someone, and far from the
first
> > one,
> > > > > states they have lost, you claim it's the truth.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's where you've never been able to separate fiction
from
> > > > > reality. Name your list of "far from the first one" who's
> > claimed
> > > > > they are an overall loser or says they've lost in the

most

> > recent
> > > > > year.
> > > >
> > > > Check the VPfree polls where 81 out of 182 claimed they

lost

> > money
> > > in
> > > > 2005. Is that enough? Rob, when one sticks to facts it's

easy

> to
> > > > answer challenges like these. You should try it sometime.
> > > >
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?id=12224260
> > >
> > > And leave it to you to believe a bunch of 5c players would

have

> the
> > > nerve to even anonymously type that they've lost! Only from a
> > nerd....
> >
> > Leave it to you to look foolish after being presented with the
> facts.
>
> then show me the facts--along with supporting documentation that
they in fact have won!

Have you completely lost it? The "fact" was that 81 admitted they

had lost after your continual claims that no one admits they lose.

Oh yeah? Out of 182?? Out of 6000??? Guess what Sherlock. Even you
can do the math here. And you think there's a reason why people don't
supply their names to go along with their claims? Could somebody be
stuffing the ballot box?? You need to sit back, relax a bit, and take
a great big dose of reality breath. Then try again.

> You see, in my working career I constantly went
> after people like you to support their assertions on
specifications,

I believe "working career" would be considered an oxymoron in your
case. I also suspect this is your inner voice telling us exactly

why you had to move from job to job.

Yup. One reason would be for Fortune 200 companys to get the field-
expert. Another would be for the bump in salaries. In fact, when you
stagnated at IBM, ever wonder what it would be like making REAL money
if you were ever desired or qualified to work anywhere else? Hiding
in the nerd cubbyhole didn't do much for you did it. Today, if you
had had a normal younger life, you wouldn't be so easily roped in by
the gambling vice. Life would be more important to you than that!

> stress limits, failure analysis, and reliability claims until

they

> showed me absolute proof or non-arguable analysis that they

indeed

> were correct. Most of them were, and the few who weren't were the
> repeat offenders and were eventually walked out. YOU remind me of
> those phonies. You touch on a claim and then ramble on with

opinion

> that's never supported with anything. You just don't fit in here.

LMAO. This babbling continues.

And you're just not cut out to 'belong' to the video poker community.
(Oooo----that's gotta HURT!). Memories of high school......

> >
> > You know, I would have thought those losing up to $50K would

take

a
> > bit more than "nickel" play. LMAO.
>
> ??? So would anyone!

Aparently not you. Why did you say "bunch of 5c players"?

Because that's what they are. A Dancer here and a Dancer there might
skew your graph. not mine.

Every GURU loses
> > > >
> > > > Lie.
> > >
> > > Denial. Get with modern times.
> >
> > Your lies are old hat. My refutation of another one of your

lies above makes that all too clear.

>
> Every guru loses. Prove me wrong. Let's see it. Or will you take
your escape route of 'lie' again!!

That's not the issue. The issue is your claim that no one on VPfree
ever admits they lose. I proved you wrong. What more can I say.

"No one ever admits"---HAHA!! You think those sales people and ego-
math nuts are EVER going to admit losing their behinds in PUBLIC??
Just think of your own situation built on lies, addiction and the
need to justify your disease. They're stuck in the same no-way-out
rut as you. Add it up and figure it out.

> > > > > and it's the same for everyone who insists on
> > > > > playing your goofy system.
> > > >
> > > > First of all, it's not my "system". It's the mathematically
> > proven
> > > > way to maximize your chances of winnng over time.
> > >
> > > It's your system if you're stupid enough to follow it.
> >
> > RIV. I think Robs' inner voice is commenting on those who would
> > choose to follow his progressive con system.
>
> Another loss for wording. That's OK. Keep using your goofy system
and soon you'll have 90 royals!

Don't worry, I will. PS. I've already had more than 90 royals.

HAHA! Dancer said he had over 110 in 6 months! And look how much he
loses after being reeled in to play higher limits because of them!
You're in the same boat little dicky, only you don't admit to playing
for 'shots'--which you regularly do. Admit it and set yourself free.

> > > > > > > In fact, could anyone imagine the time it would take
for
> > > > > > > suicide to occur if little dicky was forced to tell

the

> > truth
> > > > > like this, instead of writing about "26 royals", "I won
> $3200"
> > > > > and "I won $1400"?! Talk about 'Oh My God's'.....!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just the facts, as usual. I'm glad you remember them so
> well.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's part of why I have so many facts that irritate you.
> > > >
> > > > If you think reminding me of my successful gambling history
> > > > would "irritate" me, then, please, keep it up. LMAO. By the
> way,
> > > I've
> > > > had 9 RFs so far this year, just to keep you up to date.
> > >
> > > HAHAHA! You're irritated every time I tell a truth about you
and
> > the addict next to you.
> >
> > In your dreams. As everyone can easily tell by my logical
replies,
> > your lies have no effect on me. I guess that is what frustrates
you
> > so much and entertains the rest of us.
>
> HAHAHA!! No effect?? HAHA! The fact you have such a neurosis
to 'set
> the record straight' correlates to you being bothered by my every
> word. I tingle over your agony.......

LMAO. Once again the inner voice is loud and clear.

It's the WORDS that eat away at you little dicky....the WORDS.

> >
> > > Oh BTW, I'll brag about only having ONE RF this
> > > year---but I'm up over $33k. 3 quik trips with very little

play-

-
> > > completely the opposite of your pathological gambling trips
back
> > and
> > > forth and back and forth.
> >
> > Hmmm. What happened to those win goals?
>
> Hit all 3 times. Doesn't that just BURN you!?

$2500*3 = $7500. $33K and $7.5K are miles apart even with one RF.
Now, would little Robbie lie to us? LMAO.

And i though you understood my win goals. Leave it to you
to 'minimalize' the 3 wins to the minimum!

> > > And I see you are behind,
> >
> > Obvious LIE, since you have no way of knowing. However, to keep
the
> > record straight, my wife and I are $8306 ahead.
>
> Yup! Just like the Queen and her live-in ol lover and Dancer and
his transformed wife, you guys all follow the same path of lies and
> deception.

Just the facts, as usual.

the facts of deception in your quest to 'belong'.

> One way to tell a nervous record report is in how the
> defendant incorporates another person into the formula. You

people

> have so little self-confidence in what you're lying about that

you

> need the comfort on mentioning another person along with your

lie.

> Transparent as a surfboy wearing baggies on the beach.....

No, I could break it down for you but I just grabbed the total. As

it turns out were both ahead about the same.

Yup....just like almost every gambler alive comes back 'about even'.
It's the easy way out little dicky. Get with the program.

> >
> > > And the missus---why she's so
> > > excited she went out to celebrate by 'taking a shot' at the
high-limit DOLLAR machines!!
> >
> > Nope, I sometimes play dollars and I play .50 quite often. She
ONLY
> > plays quarters. Are you ever right?
>
> Yes, and you're lying. She's a Dancer fan and everyone knows he
plays
> waaaay beyond his bankroll. You two are the epitome of that

disease.

No, she dislikes Dancer. Are you ever right?

Where in the world would she EVER have time to dislike Dancer?? And
if you've poisoned her about him too, then she's only your puppet on
this and you're using her again. But that's OK. I know she respects
and likes me for my honesty and forthrightedness. For all i know she
could be one of my biggest fans who writes to me all the time!
Wouldn't that be a kick--she actually has her own mind and a brain to
go along with it! Would that disturb you or what!
   

> I simply expose it and people listen. I know
> you ramble on with your long, unreadable and poorly written posts
> over on vpFREE when he lies. But all he does is come back and

make you look stupid anyway--every time.

Sure he does. Click your heels together 3 times and say it again.

Does it hurt THAT much?

> > > > > What's phoney about him is exactly what you referred to:
his expert-play nonsense. Funny, that's the same ailment YOU have!
> > > >
> > > > No, it's what makes you so jealous. Success, where you have
> > failed.
> > >
> > > Kinda hurts when your weakness is exposed around here I've
> > > noticed.....You oughta take care of that fault of yours.
> >
> > RIV. Yes, Rob, I undertand you "hurt". Get help.
>
> When at a loss for words, repeat what the master just said!

No "loss" as evidenced by the 8 words and one acronym I typed. Just
pointing out your inner voices' concern. Get help.

Attempting to justify one's failure and weakness is understandable,
when in the presence of his master. So keep it up!

> > > > > posts, in starting to read his column I'd be forced into
> doing
> > > what
> > > > > I did with the Queen's latest monstrosity--quit after the
> first
> > > two
> > > > > paragraphs!
> > > > >
> > > > > > You claim to despise them and yet, you read them all

the

> > time.
> > > Do
> > > > > I detect a sense of jealousy/hypocracy ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Too late little dicky--you missed out again! I read a few
> > > > paragraphs
> > > > > of 'the monstrosity' then 86'd it right where it belongs.

I

> > just
> > > > > can't wait for the new announcement of her new one! Maybe
> she's
> > > > > gonna unveil it with Katy Couric!! HAHAHA!!!
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, Biffy-boy, but you can't hide from the fact that you
> > > couldn't
> > > > wait to read the column. Jealousy is YOU.
> > >
> > > Um, what column??
> >
> > You said. "in starting to read his column I'd be forced into
doing
> > what I did with the Queen's latest monstrosity--quit after the
> first
> > two paragraphs!". If you did not mean you started reading her
> column
> > than I would suggest you not claim that you did.
>
> I read everyone's columns--that's where I get the BS for my
expose's!

Then why did you lie about it?

Not lying. I referred to the (and exceedingly BORING) first part of
the monstrosity. So ask another vorny question.

> But the books are another story. Dancer's are interesting. Your
> Queen's--and especially your hero idol Paymar's
> numerical/boring/repititious nonsense--is worthy of only the

trash bin.

And you think they care what you think? LMAO.

They do....more than you want to believe. and they have for many
years....long before you came along wanting to 'belong'.

> >
> > > You see you're so rattled by me that you can't even
> > > follow your own path--other than the one you've laid out with
the missus to destruction from gambling!
> >
> > LMAO. It's pretty obvious who's really "rattled" here.
>
> When at a loss for words, repeat what the master has said!!

This time it's 7 words and another acronym. Are you ever right?

Then repeat what the STUDENT has said! Oh, this is sooo much fun I
want it to last FOREVER!!!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > > > > > From misscraps on vpFREE:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >In 2004 I filed my tax return with "winning"
> and "losing
> > > > > > sessions" and the winning sessions were less than the
> amount
> > of
> > > > > > W2Gs. As per Jean Scott's instructions.......
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Uh-oh. There's her first mistake!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not surprising that you'd claim anyone telling the
truth is making a mistake.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > HAHA! That's a good little one!! Your friend misscraps--
> whom I warned BEFORE her over anxious and sweaty-palmed move to

be

closer to the addict machines--that all she'd be doing if she
insisted on the long-term strategy 'crap', is giving away all her

and

hubby's hard-earned and/or Gov't. issued money. So you're right.
Listening to your Queen's (and I LOVE this part!) "instructions"
indeed was not her first mistake.
> > > > >
> > > > > You avoided the issue. Once again, not surprising.
> > > >
> > > > Here's a flash---I brought the issue forward and it seems
> you're again left speechless.
> > >
> > > Sorry, but the only issue here is you stating someone telling
the truth is a mistake. It's a clear indicator of your penchant for
> > lying.
> >
> > Then you missed another one....zzziiinnnnggggg.......!

misscraps

> made a mistake -- and apparently a BIG, irritable one - in
following your heroes 'instructions'.
>
> I don't think that has yet been determined. The IRS only asked

for

> clarification. So, not an issue. We're back to your lies as the
only issue.

You thinking is another in a long line of the mistakes YOU'VE made
since you've allowed gambling to surse the lives of you & the

missus.

I see you agree. Now, admit your lies. It's a good start on the road
to recovery.

Obviously, not an issue to you because you're not walking in her
shoes. She's rightfully concerned, and the reason is crystal clear.

Concerned, yes. An issue, no. Now, if and when the IRS denies her
claims, then that would be an issue. Try to keep up.

If they go after more money from her and her husband that she

likely

sneaks money from at every turn, she won't have much to gamble with
any more. Now just THINK of the position a scenario like that would
put YOU into! Pathological gambling addicts don't respond well to

not

having cash around any longer. That's her true concern.

Do you really have to be so foolish? The worst that can happen is she
is forced to claim all the w2gs on her 1040 and possibly lose some
deductions. Of course, that's no worse than if she had started with
that approach. The other possibility is the IRS says OK and she pays
less in taxes.

> > > > > > > > >I do not file as Schedule C, for one thing I lose
> money
> > > > > > gambling.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And then she so nicely makes up for it there. Now
> > imagine
> > > > the
> > > > > > > Queen--any 'optimal play expert' that depends on

income

> > from
> > > > the
> > > > > > trinkets they sell, for that matter--telling the truth
out
> in
> > > > > public
> > > > > > like this!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rob, you stated previously that everyone lied about
their
> > VP
> > > > > > results on VPfree. Now, when someone, and far from the
> first
> > > one,
> > > > > > states they have lost, you claim it's the truth.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here's where you've never been able to separate fiction
> from
> > > > > > reality. Name your list of "far from the first one"

who's

> > > claimed
> > > > > > they are an overall loser or says they've lost in the
most
> > > recent
> > > > > > year.
> > > > >
> > > > > Check the VPfree polls where 81 out of 182 claimed they
lost
> > > money
> > > > in
> > > > > 2005. Is that enough? Rob, when one sticks to facts it's
easy
> > to
> > > > > answer challenges like these. You should try it sometime.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?id=12224260
> > > >
> > > > And leave it to you to believe a bunch of 5c players would
have
> > the
> > > > nerve to even anonymously type that they've lost! Only from

a

> > > nerd....
> > >
> > > Leave it to you to look foolish after being presented with

the

> > facts.
> >
> > then show me the facts--along with supporting documentation

that

> they in fact have won!
>
> Have you completely lost it? The "fact" was that 81 admitted they
had lost after your continual claims that no one admits they lose.

Oh yeah? Out of 182??

Yup. It's nice to see your reading comprehension improving.

Out of 6000??? Guess what Sherlock. Even you
can do the math here. And you think there's a reason why people

don't

supply their names to go along with their claims? Could somebody be
stuffing the ballot box?? You need to sit back, relax a bit, and

take

a great big dose of reality breath. Then try again.

Did you contribute to this poll?

>
> > You see, in my working career I constantly went
> > after people like you to support their assertions on
> specifications,
>
> I believe "working career" would be considered an oxymoron in

your

> case. I also suspect this is your inner voice telling us exactly
why you had to move from job to job.

Yup. One reason would be for Fortune 200 companys to get the field-
expert. Another would be for the bump in salaries.

And then to quit and try a gambling career at 40? Your prime earning
years. LMAO. Do you really think anyone believes this BS?

In fact, when you
stagnated at IBM, ever wonder what it would be like making REAL

money

if you were ever desired or qualified to work anywhere else?

Nope. I knew the answer already. Could also be why IBM paid me very
well.

Hiding
in the nerd cubbyhole didn't do much for you did it. Today, if you
had had a normal younger life, you wouldn't be so easily roped in

by

the gambling vice. Life would be more important to you than that!

I think little Robbies' inner voice just gave us a little insight why
he took up that gambling career so young.

>
> > stress limits, failure analysis, and reliability claims until
they
> > showed me absolute proof or non-arguable analysis that they
indeed
> > were correct. Most of them were, and the few who weren't were

the

> > repeat offenders and were eventually walked out. YOU remind me

of

> > those phonies. You touch on a claim and then ramble on with
opinion
> > that's never supported with anything. You just don't fit in

here.

>
> LMAO. This babbling continues.

And you're just not cut out to 'belong' to the video poker

community.

(Oooo----that's gotta HURT!). Memories of high school......

No. But I think it's pretty clear you think a lot about your high
school days. Was that the high point of your life? Has it been down
hill ever since? Adults don't tend to put up with abuse like kids do,
and I suspect you got the ax more than once for exactly that behavior.

>
> > >
> > > You know, I would have thought those losing up to $50K would
take
> a
> > > bit more than "nickel" play. LMAO.
> >
> > ??? So would anyone!
>
> Aparently not you. Why did you say "bunch of 5c players"?

Because that's what they are. A Dancer here and a Dancer there

might

skew your graph. not mine.

Another admission of lying. Thank you.

>
> Every GURU loses
> > > > >
> > > > > Lie.
> > > >
> > > > Denial. Get with modern times.
> > >
> > > Your lies are old hat. My refutation of another one of your
lies above makes that all too clear.
> >
> > Every guru loses. Prove me wrong. Let's see it. Or will you

take

> your escape route of 'lie' again!!
>
> That's not the issue. The issue is your claim that no one on

VPfree

> ever admits they lose. I proved you wrong. What more can I say.

"No one ever admits"---HAHA!! You think those sales people and ego-
math nuts are EVER going to admit losing their behinds in PUBLIC??
Just think of your own situation built on lies, addiction and the
need to justify your disease. They're stuck in the same no-way-out
rut as you. Add it up and figure it out.

I see you're back to babbling after being caught in another lie.
Anyone surprised?

> > > > > > and it's the same for everyone who insists on
> > > > > > playing your goofy system.
> > > > >
> > > > > First of all, it's not my "system". It's the

mathematically

> > > proven
> > > > > way to maximize your chances of winnng over time.
> > > >
> > > > It's your system if you're stupid enough to follow it.
> > >
> > > RIV. I think Robs' inner voice is commenting on those who

would

> > > choose to follow his progressive con system.
> >
> > Another loss for wording. That's OK. Keep using your goofy

system

> and soon you'll have 90 royals!
>
> Don't worry, I will. PS. I've already had more than 90 royals.

HAHA! Dancer said he had over 110 in 6 months! And look how much he
loses after being reeled in to play higher limits because of them!

Neither you nor I knows whether he wins or loses, which makes this
another one of your many lies.

You're in the same boat little dicky, only you don't admit to

playing

for 'shots'--which you regularly do. Admit it and set yourself free.

Sorry, Biffy-boy, but that would be lie and you already know I stick
to facts.

>
> > > > > > > > In fact, could anyone imagine the time it would

take

> for
> > > > > > > > suicide to occur if little dicky was forced to tell
the
> > > truth
> > > > > > like this, instead of writing about "26 royals", "I won
> > $3200"
> > > > > > and "I won $1400"?! Talk about 'Oh My God's'.....!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just the facts, as usual. I'm glad you remember them

so

> > well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's part of why I have so many facts that irritate

you.

> > > > >
> > > > > If you think reminding me of my successful gambling

history

> > > > > would "irritate" me, then, please, keep it up. LMAO. By

the

> > way,
> > > > I've
> > > > > had 9 RFs so far this year, just to keep you up to date.
> > > >
> > > > HAHAHA! You're irritated every time I tell a truth about

you

> and
> > > the addict next to you.
> > >
> > > In your dreams. As everyone can easily tell by my logical
> replies,
> > > your lies have no effect on me. I guess that is what

frustrates

> you
> > > so much and entertains the rest of us.
> >
> > HAHAHA!! No effect?? HAHA! The fact you have such a neurosis
> to 'set
> > the record straight' correlates to you being bothered by my

every

> > word. I tingle over your agony.......
>
> LMAO. Once again the inner voice is loud and clear.

It's the WORDS that eat away at you little dicky....the WORDS.

No, it's the "WORDS" that betray you. These "WORDS" that your inner
voice inserts into all your lies so we'll all know.

>
> > >
> > > > Oh BTW, I'll brag about only having ONE RF this
> > > > year---but I'm up over $33k. 3 quik trips with very little
play-
> -
> > > > completely the opposite of your pathological gambling trips
> back
> > > and
> > > > forth and back and forth.
> > >
> > > Hmmm. What happened to those win goals?
> >
> > Hit all 3 times. Doesn't that just BURN you!?
>
> $2500*3 = $7500. $33K and $7.5K are miles apart even with one RF.
> Now, would little Robbie lie to us? LMAO.

And i though you understood my win goals. Leave it to you
to 'minimalize' the 3 wins to the minimum!

What'sa matter Biffy-boy? The facts pointing out another one of your
lies? I didn't say your results had to be exactly $7500, I just noted
the HUGH descrepancy.

>
> > > > And I see you are behind,
> > >
> > > Obvious LIE, since you have no way of knowing. However, to

keep

> the
> > > record straight, my wife and I are $8306 ahead.
> >
> > Yup! Just like the Queen and her live-in ol lover and Dancer

and

> his transformed wife, you guys all follow the same path of lies

and

> > deception.
>
> Just the facts, as usual.

the facts of deception in your quest to 'belong'.

That would be a contradictory phrase. Nice try to sound like me, but
it came out all wrong.

>
> > One way to tell a nervous record report is in how the
> > defendant incorporates another person into the formula. You
people
> > have so little self-confidence in what you're lying about that
you
> > need the comfort on mentioning another person along with your
lie.
> > Transparent as a surfboy wearing baggies on the beach.....
>
> No, I could break it down for you but I just grabbed the total.

As

it turns out were both ahead about the same.

Yup....just like almost every gambler alive comes back 'about

even'.

It's the easy way out little dicky. Get with the program.

I said "ahead", not "about even". Your wishes have no place in the
world of facts. However, to be exact I'm $4430 ahead and my wife is
ahead the rest of the $8306. Like I said ... about the same.

>
> > >
> > > > And the missus---why she's so
> > > > excited she went out to celebrate by 'taking a shot' at the
> high-limit DOLLAR machines!!
> > >
> > > Nope, I sometimes play dollars and I play .50 quite often.

She

> ONLY
> > > plays quarters. Are you ever right?
> >
> > Yes, and you're lying. She's a Dancer fan and everyone knows he
> plays
> > waaaay beyond his bankroll. You two are the epitome of that
disease.
>
> No, she dislikes Dancer. Are you ever right?

Where in the world would she EVER have time to dislike Dancer??

Just once through a greeting line at Fiesta was all it took.

And
if you've poisoned her about him too, then she's only your puppet

on

this and you're using her again. But that's OK. I know she respects
and likes me for my honesty and forthrightedness.

ROTFLMAO. She knows nothing about you. Why would she? You are a
nobody. However, she does like Jean Scott.

For all i know she
could be one of my biggest fans who writes to me all the time!
Wouldn't that be a kick--she actually has her own mind and a brain

to

go along with it! Would that disturb you or what!

Da plane, da plane.

> > I simply expose it and people listen. I know
> > you ramble on with your long, unreadable and poorly written

posts

> > over on vpFREE when he lies. But all he does is come back and
make you look stupid anyway--every time.
>
> Sure he does. Click your heels together 3 times and say it again.

Does it hurt THAT much?

Still not true. Maybe you should take another trip to Fantasy Island.

> > > > > > What's phoney about him is exactly what you referred

to:

> his expert-play nonsense. Funny, that's the same ailment YOU have!
> > > > >
> > > > > No, it's what makes you so jealous. Success, where you

have

> > > failed.
> > > >
> > > > Kinda hurts when your weakness is exposed around here I've
> > > > noticed.....You oughta take care of that fault of yours.
> > >
> > > RIV. Yes, Rob, I undertand you "hurt". Get help.
> >
> > When at a loss for words, repeat what the master just said!
>
> No "loss" as evidenced by the 8 words and one acronym I typed.

Just

> pointing out your inner voices' concern. Get help.

Attempting to justify one's failure and weakness is understandable,
when in the presence of his master. So keep it up!

I'm sure your inner voice will keep it up. That's one thing we can
all count on.

>
> > > > > > posts, in starting to read his column I'd be forced

into

> > doing
> > > > what
> > > > > > I did with the Queen's latest monstrosity--quit after

the

> > first
> > > > two
> > > > > > paragraphs!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > You claim to despise them and yet, you read them all
the
> > > time.
> > > > Do
> > > > > > I detect a sense of jealousy/hypocracy ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Too late little dicky--you missed out again! I read a

few

> > > > > paragraphs
> > > > > > of 'the monstrosity' then 86'd it right where it

belongs.

I
> > > just
> > > > > > can't wait for the new announcement of her new one!

Maybe

> > she's
> > > > > > gonna unveil it with Katy Couric!! HAHAHA!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry, Biffy-boy, but you can't hide from the fact that

you

> > > > couldn't
> > > > > wait to read the column. Jealousy is YOU.
> > > >
> > > > Um, what column??
> > >
> > > You said. "in starting to read his column I'd be forced into
> doing
> > > what I did with the Queen's latest monstrosity--quit after

the

> > first
> > > two paragraphs!". If you did not mean you started reading her
> > column
> > > than I would suggest you not claim that you did.
> >
> > I read everyone's columns--that's where I get the BS for my
> expose's!
>
> Then why did you lie about it?

Not lying. I referred to the (and exceedingly BORING) first part of
the monstrosity. So ask another vorny question.

Then you said "What column?". Pointing out your lies is so easy.

>
> > But the books are another story. Dancer's are interesting. Your
> > Queen's--and especially your hero idol Paymar's
> > numerical/boring/repititious nonsense--is worthy of only the
trash bin.
>
> And you think they care what you think? LMAO.

They do....more than you want to believe. and they have for many
years....long before you came along wanting to 'belong'.

No, I think it's exactly what I said but a lot less than YOU want to
believe. Why would they care what a nobody says?

>
> > >
> > > > You see you're so rattled by me that you can't even
> > > > follow your own path--other than the one you've laid out

with

> the missus to destruction from gambling!
> > >
> > > LMAO. It's pretty obvious who's really "rattled" here.
> >
> > When at a loss for words, repeat what the master has said!!
>
> This time it's 7 words and another acronym. Are you ever right?

Then repeat what the STUDENT has said! Oh, this is sooo much fun I
want it to last FOREVER!!!!

Just keep posting your inner voices's opinion of YOU and it will
last "FOREVER". However, I would have thought you'd rather not look
so foolish so often. So be it.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > From misscraps on vpFREE:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >In 2004 I filed my tax return with "winning"
> > and "losing
> > > > > > > sessions" and the winning sessions were less than

the

> > amount
> > > of
> > > > > > > W2Gs. As per Jean Scott's instructions.......
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Uh-oh. There's her first mistake!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Not surprising that you'd claim anyone telling the
> truth is making a mistake.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > HAHA! That's a good little one!! Your friend

misscraps--

> > whom I warned BEFORE her over anxious and sweaty-palmed move

to

be
> closer to the addict machines--that all she'd be doing if she
> insisted on the long-term strategy 'crap', is giving away all

her

and
> hubby's hard-earned and/or Gov't. issued money. So you're right.
> Listening to your Queen's (and I LOVE this part!) "instructions"
> indeed was not her first mistake.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You avoided the issue. Once again, not surprising.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's a flash---I brought the issue forward and it

seems

> > you're again left speechless.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, but the only issue here is you stating someone

telling

> the truth is a mistake. It's a clear indicator of your penchant

for

> > > lying.
> > >
> > > Then you missed another one....zzziiinnnnggggg.......!
misscraps
> > made a mistake -- and apparently a BIG, irritable one - in
> following your heroes 'instructions'.
> >
> > I don't think that has yet been determined. The IRS only asked
for
> > clarification. So, not an issue. We're back to your lies as

the

> only issue.
>
> You thinking is another in a long line of the mistakes YOU'VE

made

> since you've allowed gambling to curse the lives of you & the
missus.

I see you agree. Now, admit your lies. It's a good start on the

road

to recovery.

> Obviously, not an issue to you because you're not walking in her
> shoes. She's rightfully concerned, and the reason is crystal

clear.

Concerned, yes. An issue, no. Now, if and when the IRS denies her
claims, then that would be an issue. Try to keep up.

Isn't it just like an addicted gambler in denial to procrastinate in
making things right, and make believe it'll all just 'go away".
Thaty's why the majority of you fools have so many problems in life.
Moral, physical, emotional, you name it.

> If they go after more money from her and her husband that she
likely
> sneaks money from at every turn, she won't have much to gamble

with

> any more. Now just THINK of the position a scenario like that

would

> put YOU into! Pathological gambling addicts don't respond well

to

not
> having cash around any longer. That's her true concern.

Do you really have to be so foolish? The worst that can happen is

she

is forced to claim all the w2gs on her 1040 and possibly lose some
deductions. Of course, that's no worse than if she had started

with

that approach. The other possibility is the IRS says OK and she

pays

less in taxes.

Always looking at the bright side of an IRS inquiry. That's another
addict mistake. Minimalizing the consequences even before they
appear. The bottom line is, she and her googly-eyed hubby are in
deep poop, and if they're not this time then they've been in the
past and they'll be there again in the future. Live with it.

>
> > > > > > > > > >I do not file as Schedule C, for one thing I

lose

> > money
> > > > > > > gambling.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > And then she so nicely makes up for it there.

Now

> > > imagine
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > Queen--any 'optimal play expert' that depends on
income
> > > from
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > trinkets they sell, for that matter--telling the

truth

> out
> > in
> > > > > > public
> > > > > > > like this!!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Rob, you stated previously that everyone lied

about

> their
> > > VP
> > > > > > > results on VPfree. Now, when someone, and far from

the

> > first
> > > > one,
> > > > > > > states they have lost, you claim it's the truth.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here's where you've never been able to separate

fiction

> > from
> > > > > > > reality. Name your list of "far from the first one"
who's
> > > > claimed
> > > > > > > they are an overall loser or says they've lost in

the

> most
> > > > recent
> > > > > > > year.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Check the VPfree polls where 81 out of 182 claimed

they

> lost
> > > > money
> > > > > in
> > > > > > 2005. Is that enough? Rob, when one sticks to facts

it's

> easy
> > > to
> > > > > > answer challenges like these. You should try it

sometime.

> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?

id=12224260

> > > > >
> > > > > And leave it to you to believe a bunch of 5c players

would

> have
> > > the
> > > > > nerve to even anonymously type that they've lost! Only

from

a
> > > > nerd....
> > > >
> > > > Leave it to you to look foolish after being presented with
the
> > > facts.
> > >
> > > then show me the facts--along with supporting documentation
that
> > they in fact have won!
> >
> > Have you completely lost it? The "fact" was that 81 admitted

they

> had lost after your continual claims that no one admits they

lose.

>
> Oh yeah? Out of 182??

Yup. It's nice to see your reading comprehension improving.

> Out of 6000??? Guess what Sherlock. Even you
> can do the math here. And you think there's a reason why people
don't
> supply their names to go along with their claims? Could somebody

be

> stuffing the ballot box?? You need to sit back, relax a bit, and
take
> a great big dose of reality breath. Then try again.

Did you contribute to this poll?

Nice answer. You just said how right I am.

> >
> > > You see, in my working career I constantly went
> > > after people like you to support their assertions on
> > specifications,
> >
> > I believe "working career" would be considered an oxymoron in
your
> > case. I also suspect this is your inner voice telling us

exactly

> why you had to move from job to job.
>
> Yup. One reason would be for Fortune 200 companys to get the

field-

> expert. Another would be for the bump in salaries.

And then to quit and try a gambling career at 40? Your prime

earning

years. LMAO. Do you really think anyone believes this BS?

Certainly YOU wouldn't....or rather, wouldn't WANT to. Imagine the
wet dreams you have of wondering what it would be like to have been
a degenerate gambler since a younger age? But here's another hint in
case you have the fortune of living another life: When you've done
it all, you try something else. It doesn't mean much to a nobody
like you now, but just in case.....

> In fact, when you
> stagnated at IBM, ever wonder what it would be like making REAL
money
> if you were ever desired or qualified to work anywhere else?

Nope. I knew the answer already. Could also be why IBM paid me

very well.

All introverts believe they're paid well, simply because they never
got 'out of the house'. Similarly, that's why no one ever headhunts
for them. Every company has more than enough numbers crunchers and
self-proclaimed computer geeks.

> Hiding
> in the nerd cubbyhole didn't do much for you did it. Today, if

you

> had had a normal younger life, you wouldn't be so easily roped

in

by
> the gambling vice. Life would be more important to you than that!

I think little Robbies' inner voice just gave us a little insight

why he took up that gambling career so young.

This is the no-spin zone as O'Reillt says. Try to keep in bounds.

> >
> > > stress limits, failure analysis, and reliability claims

until

> they
> > > showed me absolute proof or non-arguable analysis that they
> indeed
> > > were correct. Most of them were, and the few who weren't

were

the
> > > repeat offenders and were eventually walked out. YOU remind

me

of
> > > those phonies. You touch on a claim and then ramble on with
> opinion
> > > that's never supported with anything. You just don't fit in
here.
> >
> > LMAO. This babbling continues.
>
> And you're just not cut out to 'belong' to the video poker
community.
> (Oooo----that's gotta HURT!). Memories of high school......

No. But I think it's pretty clear you think a lot about your high
school days. Was that the high point of your life? Has it been

down

hill ever since? Adults don't tend to put up with abuse like kids

do,

and I suspect you got the ax more than once for exactly that

behavior.

And why did he just dance around the ridicule I just laid on him??

> >
> > > >
> > > > You know, I would have thought those losing up to $50K

would

> take
> > a
> > > > bit more than "nickel" play. LMAO.
> > >
> > > ??? So would anyone!
> >
> > Aparently not you. Why did you say "bunch of 5c players"?
>
> Because that's what they are. A Dancer here and a Dancer there
might
> skew your graph. not mine.

Another admission of lying. Thank you.

If that's how you want it. But the truth seems to bother you, and it
comes at you in a non-stop pace.

> >
> > Every GURU loses
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Lie.
> > > > >
> > > > > Denial. Get with modern times.
> > > >
> > > > Your lies are old hat. My refutation of another one of

your

> lies above makes that all too clear.
> > >
> > > Every guru loses. Prove me wrong. Let's see it. Or will you
take
> > your escape route of 'lie' again!!
> >
> > That's not the issue. The issue is your claim that no one on
VPfree
> > ever admits they lose. I proved you wrong. What more can I say.
>
> "No one ever admits"---HAHA!! You think those sales people and

ego-

> math nuts are EVER going to admit losing their behinds in

PUBLIC??

> Just think of your own situation built on lies, addiction and

the

> need to justify your disease. They're stuck in the same no-way-

out

> rut as you. Add it up and figure it out.

I see you're back to babbling after being caught in another lie.
Anyone surprised?

Dancing around the facts again---you could have at least allowed
yourself to let me see you whimper at the truth again.

>
> > > > > > > and it's the same for everyone who insists on
> > > > > > > playing your goofy system.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > First of all, it's not my "system". It's the
mathematically
> > > > proven
> > > > > > way to maximize your chances of winnng over time.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's your system if you're stupid enough to follow it.
> > > >
> > > > RIV. I think Robs' inner voice is commenting on those who
would
> > > > choose to follow his progressive con system.
> > >
> > > Another loss for wording. That's OK. Keep using your goofy
system
> > and soon you'll have 90 royals!
> >
> > Don't worry, I will. PS. I've already had more than 90 royals.
>
> HAHA! Dancer said he had over 110 in 6 months! And look how much

he

> loses after being reeled in to play higher limits because of

them!

Neither you nor I knows whether he wins or loses, which makes this
another one of your many lies.

I know. You would never want to, and besides, you'd claim some sort
of phony this or that even with absolute proof before your eyes. You
have to. How else would you be able to continue on with your
gambling knowing that your gurus heroes are the biggest losers out
there? Although I do really suspect you understand that they do
lose....just as you lose. All the time and tons of dinero. And all
because of that goofy system you habitually follow.

Oh BTW, I'll brag about only having ONE RF this
> > > > > year---but I'm up over $33k. 3 quik trips with very

little play-completely the opposite of your pathological gambling
trips back and forth and back and forth.

> > > >
> > > > Hmmm. What happened to those win goals?
> > >
> > > Hit all 3 times. Doesn't that just BURN you!?
> >
> > $2500*3 = $7500. $33K and $7.5K are miles apart even with one

RF.

> > Now, would little Robbie lie to us? LMAO.
>
> And i though you understood my win goals. Leave it to you
> to 'minimalize' the 3 wins to the minimum!

What'sa matter Biffy-boy? The facts pointing out another one of

your lies? I didn't say your results had to be exactly $7500, I just
noted the HUGH descrepancy.

You mean huge I think. If so, what's you mean by 'discrepancy',
little dicky?? Anything over $2500/trip is valid. You know that. I
do believe you're envious once again. Happens every time I hit you
with my results. Higher limits = big jackpots--make sense yet? Only
thing is, you can't seem to get staying on at the machines and
playing until the missus comes after you with the rolling pin. Not
my bag, little dicky. That's why I'm the best ever!

> >
> > > > > And I see you are behind,
> > > >
> > > > Obvious LIE, since you have no way of knowing. However, to
keep
> > the
> > > > record straight, my wife and I are $8306 ahead.
> > >
> > > Yup! Just like the Queen and her live-in ol lover and Dancer
and
> > his transformed wife, you guys all follow the same path of

lies

and
> > > deception.
> >
> > Just the facts, as usual.
>
> the facts of deception in your quest to 'belong'.

That would be a contradictory phrase. Nice try to sound like me,

but

it came out all wrong.

Yours is the only tongue that's twisted. It's all part of your show
here.

> >
> > > One way to tell a nervous record report is in how the
> > > defendant incorporates another person into the formula. You
> people
> > > have so little self-confidence in what you're lying about

that

> you
> > > need the comfort on mentioning another person along with

your

> lie.
> > > Transparent as a surfboy wearing baggies on the beach.....
> >
> > No, I could break it down for you but I just grabbed the

total.

As
> it turns out were both ahead about the same.
>
> Yup....just like almost every gambler alive comes back 'about
even'.
> It's the easy way out little dicky. Get with the program.

I said "ahead", not "about even". Your wishes have no place in the
world of facts. However, to be exact I'm $4430 ahead and my wife

is

ahead the rest of the $8306. Like I said ... about the same.

Yup, just as I said and expected: We're both about the same....i.e.,
we're EVEN! It's like a contest. A shameful contest.

> >
> > > >
> > > > > And the missus---why she's so
> > > > > excited she went out to celebrate by 'taking a shot' at

the

> > high-limit DOLLAR machines!!
> > > >
> > > > Nope, I sometimes play dollars and I play .50 quite often.
She
> > ONLY
> > > > plays quarters. Are you ever right?
> > >
> > > Yes, and you're lying. She's a Dancer fan and everyone knows

he

> > plays
> > > waaaay beyond his bankroll. You two are the epitome of that
> disease.
> >
> > No, she dislikes Dancer. Are you ever right?
>
> Where in the world would she EVER have time to dislike Dancer??

Just once through a greeting line at Fiesta was all it took.

I don't disagree with that. Most people recognize a phony when they
meet face to face.

> And
> if you've poisoned her about him too, then she's only your

puppet

on
> this and you're using her again. But that's OK. I know she

respects

> and likes me for my honesty and forthrightedness.

ROTFLMAO. She knows nothing about you. Why would she? You are a
nobody. However, she does like Jean Scott.

Now THAT's a LOW BLOW!!

> For all i know she
> could be one of my biggest fans who writes to me all the time!
> Wouldn't that be a kick--she actually has her own mind and a

brain

to
> go along with it! Would that disturb you or what!

Da plane, da plane.

Da fan....da fan!

>
> > > I simply expose it and people listen. I know
> > > you ramble on with your long, unreadable and poorly written
posts
> > > over on vpFREE when he lies. But all he does is come back

and

> make you look stupid anyway--every time.
> >
> > Sure he does. Click your heels together 3 times and say it

again.

>
> Does it hurt THAT much?

Still not true. Maybe you should take another trip to Fantasy

Island.

I made my last visit there in 1996. Right now it's overloaded with
mostly vpFREE bananaheads.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > From misscraps on vpFREE:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >In 2004 I filed my tax return with "winning"
> > > and "losing
> > > > > > > > sessions" and the winning sessions were less than
the
> > > amount
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > W2Gs. As per Jean Scott's instructions.......
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Uh-oh. There's her first mistake!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Not surprising that you'd claim anyone telling

the

> > truth is making a mistake.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > HAHA! That's a good little one!! Your friend
misscraps--
> > > whom I warned BEFORE her over anxious and sweaty-palmed move
to
> be
> > closer to the addict machines--that all she'd be doing if she
> > insisted on the long-term strategy 'crap', is giving away all
her
> and
> > hubby's hard-earned and/or Gov't. issued money. So you're

right.

> > Listening to your Queen's (and I LOVE this

part!) "instructions"

> > indeed was not her first mistake.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You avoided the issue. Once again, not surprising.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here's a flash---I brought the issue forward and it
seems
> > > you're again left speechless.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry, but the only issue here is you stating someone
telling
> > the truth is a mistake. It's a clear indicator of your penchant
for
> > > > lying.
> > > >
> > > > Then you missed another one....zzziiinnnnggggg.......!
> misscraps
> > > made a mistake -- and apparently a BIG, irritable one - in
> > following your heroes 'instructions'.
> > >
> > > I don't think that has yet been determined. The IRS only

asked

> for
> > > clarification. So, not an issue. We're back to your lies as
the
> > only issue.
> >
> > You thinking is another in a long line of the mistakes YOU'VE
made
> > since you've allowed gambling to curse the lives of you & the
> missus.
>
> I see you agree. Now, admit your lies. It's a good start on the
road
> to recovery.
>
> > Obviously, not an issue to you because you're not walking in

her

> > shoes. She's rightfully concerned, and the reason is crystal
clear.
>
> Concerned, yes. An issue, no. Now, if and when the IRS denies her
> claims, then that would be an issue. Try to keep up.

Isn't it just like an addicted gambler in denial to procrastinate

in

making things right, and make believe it'll all just 'go away".
Thaty's why the majority of you fools have so many problems in

life.

Moral, physical, emotional, you name it.

RIV.

>
> > If they go after more money from her and her husband that she
> likely
> > sneaks money from at every turn, she won't have much to gamble
with
> > any more. Now just THINK of the position a scenario like that
would
> > put YOU into! Pathological gambling addicts don't respond well
to
> not
> > having cash around any longer. That's her true concern.
>
> Do you really have to be so foolish? The worst that can happen is
she
> is forced to claim all the w2gs on her 1040 and possibly lose

some

> deductions. Of course, that's no worse than if she had started
with
> that approach. The other possibility is the IRS says OK and she
pays
> less in taxes.

Always looking at the bright side of an IRS inquiry. That's another
addict mistake. Minimalizing the consequences even before they
appear. The bottom line is, she and her googly-eyed hubby are in
deep poop, and if they're not this time then they've been in the
past and they'll be there again in the future. Live with it.

It is nice to see little Robbie could not come up with anything ...
again. Just more asserted lies. I hope you read that proverb.

>
> >
> > > > > > > > > > >I do not file as Schedule C, for one thing I
lose
> > > money
> > > > > > > > gambling.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > And then she so nicely makes up for it there.
Now
> > > > imagine
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > Queen--any 'optimal play expert' that depends on
> income
> > > > from
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > trinkets they sell, for that matter--telling the
truth
> > out
> > > in
> > > > > > > public
> > > > > > > > like this!!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Rob, you stated previously that everyone lied
about
> > their
> > > > VP
> > > > > > > > results on VPfree. Now, when someone, and far from
the
> > > first
> > > > > one,
> > > > > > > > states they have lost, you claim it's the truth.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Here's where you've never been able to separate
fiction
> > > from
> > > > > > > > reality. Name your list of "far from the first one"
> who's
> > > > > claimed
> > > > > > > > they are an overall loser or says they've lost in
the
> > most
> > > > > recent
> > > > > > > > year.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Check the VPfree polls where 81 out of 182 claimed
they
> > lost
> > > > > money
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > 2005. Is that enough? Rob, when one sticks to facts
it's
> > easy
> > > > to
> > > > > > > answer challenges like these. You should try it
sometime.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?
id=12224260
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And leave it to you to believe a bunch of 5c players
would
> > have
> > > > the
> > > > > > nerve to even anonymously type that they've lost! Only
from
> a
> > > > > nerd....
> > > > >
> > > > > Leave it to you to look foolish after being presented

with

> the
> > > > facts.
> > > >
> > > > then show me the facts--along with supporting documentation
> that
> > > they in fact have won!
> > >
> > > Have you completely lost it? The "fact" was that 81 admitted
they
> > had lost after your continual claims that no one admits they
lose.
> >
> > Oh yeah? Out of 182??
>
> Yup. It's nice to see your reading comprehension improving.
>
> > Out of 6000??? Guess what Sherlock. Even you
> > can do the math here. And you think there's a reason why people
> don't
> > supply their names to go along with their claims? Could

somebody

be
> > stuffing the ballot box?? You need to sit back, relax a bit,

and

> take
> > a great big dose of reality breath. Then try again.
>
> Did you contribute to this poll?

Nice answer. You just said how right I am.

Nope. Nice try. Answer the question. Of course, you know as well as I
do that your answer invalidates everything you wrote.

>
> > >
> > > > You see, in my working career I constantly went
> > > > after people like you to support their assertions on
> > > specifications,
> > >
> > > I believe "working career" would be considered an oxymoron in
> your
> > > case. I also suspect this is your inner voice telling us
exactly
> > why you had to move from job to job.
> >
> > Yup. One reason would be for Fortune 200 companys to get the
field-
> > expert. Another would be for the bump in salaries.
>
> And then to quit and try a gambling career at 40? Your prime
earning
> years. LMAO. Do you really think anyone believes this BS?

Certainly YOU wouldn't....or rather, wouldn't WANT to.

No, I think it's pretty obvious why NO ONE believes you.

Imagine the
wet dreams you have of wondering what it would be like to have been
a degenerate gambler since a younger age? But here's another hint

in

case you have the fortune of living another life: When you've done
it all, you try something else. It doesn't mean much to a nobody
like you now, but just in case.....

RIV.

>
> > In fact, when you
> > stagnated at IBM, ever wonder what it would be like making REAL
> money
> > if you were ever desired or qualified to work anywhere else?
>
> Nope. I knew the answer already. Could also be why IBM paid me
very well.

All introverts believe they're paid well, simply because they never
got 'out of the house'. Similarly, that's why no one ever headhunts
for them. Every company has more than enough numbers crunchers and
self-proclaimed computer geeks.

RIV. Are you really this out of touch with reality today? The
geeks/nerds of the world can move all they want and often do. There
are headhunters galore looking for them. I realize they wouldn't pay
any attention to you with your obvious personality flaws. Is that
what gets into your craw?

>
> > Hiding
> > in the nerd cubbyhole didn't do much for you did it. Today, if
you
> > had had a normal younger life, you wouldn't be so easily roped
in
> by
> > the gambling vice. Life would be more important to you than

that!

>
> I think little Robbies' inner voice just gave us a little insight
why he took up that gambling career so young.

This is the no-spin zone as O'Reillt says. Try to keep in bounds.

Your inner voice is always "in bounds".

>
> > >
> > > > stress limits, failure analysis, and reliability claims
until
> > they
> > > > showed me absolute proof or non-arguable analysis that they
> > indeed
> > > > were correct. Most of them were, and the few who weren't
were
> the
> > > > repeat offenders and were eventually walked out. YOU remind
me
> of
> > > > those phonies. You touch on a claim and then ramble on with
> > opinion
> > > > that's never supported with anything. You just don't fit in
> here.
> > >
> > > LMAO. This babbling continues.
> >
> > And you're just not cut out to 'belong' to the video poker
> community.
> > (Oooo----that's gotta HURT!). Memories of high school......
>
> No. But I think it's pretty clear you think a lot about your high
> school days. Was that the high point of your life? Has it been
down
> hill ever since? Adults don't tend to put up with abuse like kids
do,
> and I suspect you got the ax more than once for exactly that
behavior.

And why did he just dance around the ridicule I just laid on him??

Because it was another asserted lie. I guess you're still so
frustrated you can't understand these lies will never have any impact
on me. What's really nice about them is how they always lead into
your inner voice's opinion. That rocks.

>
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You know, I would have thought those losing up to $50K
would
> > take
> > > a
> > > > > bit more than "nickel" play. LMAO.
> > > >
> > > > ??? So would anyone!
> > >
> > > Aparently not you. Why did you say "bunch of 5c players"?
> >
> > Because that's what they are. A Dancer here and a Dancer there
> might
> > skew your graph. not mine.
>
> Another admission of lying. Thank you.

If that's how you want it. But the truth seems to bother you, and

it

comes at you in a non-stop pace.

It comes FROM me. Please try to keep up.

>
> > >
> > > Every GURU loses
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Lie.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Denial. Get with modern times.
> > > > >
> > > > > Your lies are old hat. My refutation of another one of
your
> > lies above makes that all too clear.
> > > >
> > > > Every guru loses. Prove me wrong. Let's see it. Or will you
> take
> > > your escape route of 'lie' again!!
> > >
> > > That's not the issue. The issue is your claim that no one on
> VPfree
> > > ever admits they lose. I proved you wrong. What more can I

say.

> >
> > "No one ever admits"---HAHA!! You think those sales people and
ego-
> > math nuts are EVER going to admit losing their behinds in
PUBLIC??
> > Just think of your own situation built on lies, addiction and
the
> > need to justify your disease. They're stuck in the same no-way-
out
> > rut as you. Add it up and figure it out.
>
> I see you're back to babbling after being caught in another lie.
> Anyone surprised?

Dancing around the facts again---you could have at least allowed
yourself to let me see you whimper at the truth again.

Notice once again ... First, the asserted lie; then "---"; then RIV.
It happens almost every time.

>
> >
> > > > > > > > and it's the same for everyone who insists on
> > > > > > > > playing your goofy system.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > First of all, it's not my "system". It's the
> mathematically
> > > > > proven
> > > > > > > way to maximize your chances of winnng over time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's your system if you're stupid enough to follow it.
> > > > >
> > > > > RIV. I think Robs' inner voice is commenting on those who
> would
> > > > > choose to follow his progressive con system.
> > > >
> > > > Another loss for wording. That's OK. Keep using your goofy
> system
> > > and soon you'll have 90 royals!
> > >
> > > Don't worry, I will. PS. I've already had more than 90 royals.
> >
> > HAHA! Dancer said he had over 110 in 6 months! And look how

much

he
> > loses after being reeled in to play higher limits because of
them!
>
> Neither you nor I knows whether he wins or loses, which makes

this

> another one of your many lies.

I know.

Of course you do ...

You would never want to, and besides, you'd claim some sort
of phony this or that even with absolute proof before your eyes.

Let's see the "absolute proof".

You
have to. How else would you be able to continue on with your
gambling knowing that your gurus heroes are the biggest losers out
there?

I wouldn't care. I'm winning and so are many others.

Although I do really suspect you understand that they do
lose....just as you lose.

Asserted lie.

All the time and tons of dinero. And all
because of that goofy system you habitually follow.

RIV. Like I said, it works every time

> Oh BTW, I'll brag about only having ONE RF this
> > > > > > year---but I'm up over $33k. 3 quik trips with very
little play-completely the opposite of your pathological gambling
trips back and forth and back and forth.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmmm. What happened to those win goals?
> > > >
> > > > Hit all 3 times. Doesn't that just BURN you!?
> > >
> > > $2500*3 = $7500. $33K and $7.5K are miles apart even with one
RF.
> > > Now, would little Robbie lie to us? LMAO.
> >
> > And i though you understood my win goals. Leave it to you
> > to 'minimalize' the 3 wins to the minimum!
>
> What'sa matter Biffy-boy? The facts pointing out another one of
your lies? I didn't say your results had to be exactly $7500, I

just

noted the HUGH descrepancy.

You mean huge I think. If so, what's you mean by 'discrepancy',
little dicky?? Anything over $2500/trip is valid. You know that.

I also know the average win, including all RFs, is around $5K. So, I
do believe we can chalk up another lie.

I
do believe you're envious once again. Happens every time I hit you
with my results. Higher limits = big jackpots--make sense yet?

Perfect sense, if it comes out of your mouth it's probably a lie.

Only
thing is, you can't seem to get staying on at the machines and
playing until the missus comes after you with the rolling pin. Not
my bag, little dicky. That's why I'm the best ever!

RIV.

>
> > >
> > > > > > And I see you are behind,
> > > > >
> > > > > Obvious LIE, since you have no way of knowing. However,

to

> keep
> > > the
> > > > > record straight, my wife and I are $8306 ahead.
> > > >
> > > > Yup! Just like the Queen and her live-in ol lover and

Dancer

> and
> > > his transformed wife, you guys all follow the same path of
lies
> and
> > > > deception.
> > >
> > > Just the facts, as usual.
> >
> > the facts of deception in your quest to 'belong'.
>
> That would be a contradictory phrase. Nice try to sound like me,
but
> it came out all wrong.

Yours is the only tongue that's twisted. It's all part of your show
here.

Just the facts, as usual.

>
> > >
> > > > One way to tell a nervous record report is in how the
> > > > defendant incorporates another person into the formula. You
> > people
> > > > have so little self-confidence in what you're lying about
that
> > you
> > > > need the comfort on mentioning another person along with
your
> > lie.
> > > > Transparent as a surfboy wearing baggies on the beach.....
> > >
> > > No, I could break it down for you but I just grabbed the
total.
> As
> > it turns out were both ahead about the same.
> >
> > Yup....just like almost every gambler alive comes back 'about
> even'.
> > It's the easy way out little dicky. Get with the program.
>
> I said "ahead", not "about even". Your wishes have no place in

the

> world of facts. However, to be exact I'm $4430 ahead and my wife
is
> ahead the rest of the $8306. Like I said ... about the same.

Yup, just as I said and expected: We're both about the

same....i.e.,

we're EVEN!

Asserted lie ...

It's like a contest. A shameful contest.

RIV. This is so easy.

>
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > And the missus---why she's so
> > > > > > excited she went out to celebrate by 'taking a shot' at
the
> > > high-limit DOLLAR machines!!
> > > > >
> > > > > Nope, I sometimes play dollars and I play .50 quite

often.

> She
> > > ONLY
> > > > > plays quarters. Are you ever right?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, and you're lying. She's a Dancer fan and everyone

knows

he
> > > plays
> > > > waaaay beyond his bankroll. You two are the epitome of that
> > disease.
> > >
> > > No, she dislikes Dancer. Are you ever right?
> >
> > Where in the world would she EVER have time to dislike Dancer??
>
> Just once through a greeting line at Fiesta was all it took.

I don't disagree with that. Most people recognize a phony when they
meet face to face.

It was the way he treated everyone. Very arrogant.

>
> > And
> > if you've poisoned her about him too, then she's only your
puppet
> on
> > this and you're using her again. But that's OK. I know she
respects
> > and likes me for my honesty and forthrightedness.
>
> ROTFLMAO. She knows nothing about you. Why would she? You are a
> nobody. However, she does like Jean Scott.

Now THAT's a LOW BLOW!!

Just the facts, as usual.

>
> > For all i know she
> > could be one of my biggest fans who writes to me all the time!
> > Wouldn't that be a kick--she actually has her own mind and a
brain
> to
> > go along with it! Would that disturb you or what!
>
> Da plane, da plane.

Da fan....da fan!

I can tell you really need one, even your inner voice dislikes you.

> > > > I don't think that has yet been determined. The IRS only
asked
> > for
> > > > clarification. So, not an issue. We're back to your lies as
> the
> > > only issue.
> > >
> > > You thinking is another in a long line of the mistakes YOU'VE
> made
> > > since you've allowed gambling to curse the lives of you & the
> > missus.
> >
> > I see you agree. Now, admit your lies. It's a good start on the
> road
> > to recovery.
> >
> > > Obviously, not an issue to you because you're not walking in
her
> > > shoes. She's rightfully concerned, and the reason is crystal
> clear.
> >
> > Concerned, yes. An issue, no. Now, if and when the IRS denies

her

> > claims, then that would be an issue. Try to keep up.
>
> Isn't it just like an addicted gambler in denial to procrastinate
in
> making things right, and make believe it'll all just 'go away".
> Thaty's why the majority of you fools have so many problems in
life. Moral, physical, emotional, you name it. RIP.

Can't answer that one. big surprise.

> > > If they go after more money from her and her husband that she
> > likely
> > > sneaks money from at every turn, she won't have much to

gamble

> with
> > > any more. Now just THINK of the position a scenario like that
> would
> > > put YOU into! Pathological gambling addicts don't respond

well

> to
> > not
> > > having cash around any longer. That's her true concern.
> >
> > Do you really have to be so foolish? The worst that can happen

is

> she
> > is forced to claim all the w2gs on her 1040 and possibly lose
some
> > deductions. Of course, that's no worse than if she had started
> with
> > that approach. The other possibility is the IRS says OK and she
> pays
> > less in taxes.
>
> Always looking at the bright side of an IRS inquiry. That's

another

> addict mistake. Minimalizing the consequences even before they
> appear. The bottom line is, she and her googly-eyed hubby are in
> deep poop, and if they're not this time then they've been in the
> past and they'll be there again in the future. Live with it.

It is nice to see little Robbie could not come up with anything ...
again. Just more asserted lies. I hope you read that proverb.

You can keep on looking at the bright side for her because you're not
involved in THIS one. But my guess is you'll find out soon enough
what she's worried about. Addicts all lie on their tax returns
because they're addicted to BIG CHECKS from anywhere just so they can
feed the machines. One thing--at least she's honest about her
results. She's miles ahead of you on that one. Read it again--it's
all true. And here's another you can check out for yourself--and
sorry to prove you wrong again. Go to the vpFREE luncheon pics from a
few years ago and you'll see Mr. googlyeyes right before your eyes!

> >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >I do not file as Schedule C, for one thing I
> lose
> > > > money
> > > > > > > > > gambling.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > And then she so nicely makes up for it

there.

> Now
> > > > > imagine
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > Queen--any 'optimal play expert' that depends

on

> > income
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > trinkets they sell, for that matter--telling the
> truth
> > > out
> > > > in
> > > > > > > > public
> > > > > > > > > like this!!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Rob, you stated previously that everyone lied
> about
> > > their
> > > > > VP
> > > > > > > > > results on VPfree. Now, when someone, and far

from

> the
> > > > first
> > > > > > one,
> > > > > > > > > states they have lost, you claim it's the truth.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Here's where you've never been able to separate
> fiction
> > > > from
> > > > > > > > > reality. Name your list of "far from the first

one"

> > who's
> > > > > > claimed
> > > > > > > > > they are an overall loser or says they've lost in
> the
> > > most
> > > > > > recent
> > > > > > > > > year.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Check the VPfree polls where 81 out of 182 claimed
> they
> > > lost
> > > > > > money
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > 2005. Is that enough? Rob, when one sticks to facts
> it's
> > > easy
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > answer challenges like these. You should try it
> sometime.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/surveys?
> id=12224260
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And leave it to you to believe a bunch of 5c players
> would
> > > have
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > nerve to even anonymously type that they've lost!

Only

> from
> > a
> > > > > > nerd....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Leave it to you to look foolish after being presented
with
> > the
> > > > > facts.
> > > > >
> > > > > then show me the facts--along with supporting

documentation

> > that
> > > > they in fact have won!
> > > >
> > > > Have you completely lost it? The "fact" was that 81

admitted

> they
> > > had lost after your continual claims that no one admits they
> lose.
> > >
> > > Oh yeah? Out of 182??
> >
> > Yup. It's nice to see your reading comprehension improving.
> >
> > > Out of 6000??? Guess what Sherlock. Even you
> > > can do the math here. And you think there's a reason why

people

> > don't
> > > supply their names to go along with their claims? Could
somebody
> be
> > > stuffing the ballot box?? You need to sit back, relax a bit,
and
> > take
> > > a great big dose of reality breath. Then try again.
> >
> > Did you contribute to this poll?
>
> Nice answer. You just said how right I am.

Nope. Nice try. Answer the question. Of course, you know as well as

I

do that your answer invalidates everything you wrote.

> >
> > > >
> > > > > You see, in my working career I constantly went
> > > > > after people like you to support their assertions on
> > > > specifications,
> > > >
> > > > I believe "working career" would be considered an oxymoron

in

> > your
> > > > case. I also suspect this is your inner voice telling us
> exactly
> > > why you had to move from job to job.
> > >
> > > Yup. One reason would be for Fortune 200 companys to get the
> field-
> > > expert. Another would be for the bump in salaries.
> >
> > And then to quit and try a gambling career at 40? Your prime
> earning
> > years. LMAO. Do you really think anyone believes this BS?
>
> Certainly YOU wouldn't....or rather, wouldn't WANT to.

No, I think it's pretty obvious why NO ONE believes you.

> Imagine the
> wet dreams you have of wondering what it would be like to have

been

> a degenerate gambler since a younger age? But here's another hint
in
> case you have the fortune of living another life: When you've

done

> it all, you try something else. It doesn't mean much to a nobody
> like you now, but just in case.....

RIV.

> >
> > > In fact, when you
> > > stagnated at IBM, ever wonder what it would be like making

REAL

> > money
> > > if you were ever desired or qualified to work anywhere else?
> >
> > Nope. I knew the answer already. Could also be why IBM paid me
> very well.
>
> All introverts believe they're paid well, simply because they

never

> got 'out of the house'. Similarly, that's why no one ever

headhunts

> for them. Every company has more than enough numbers crunchers

and

> self-proclaimed computer geeks.

RIV. Are you really this out of touch with reality today? The
geeks/nerds of the world can move all they want and often do. There
are headhunters galore looking for them. I realize they wouldn't

pay

any attention to you with your obvious personality flaws. Is that
what gets into your craw?

> >
> > > Hiding
> > > in the nerd cubbyhole didn't do much for you did it. Today,

if

> you
> > > had had a normal younger life, you wouldn't be so easily

roped

> in
> > by
> > > the gambling vice. Life would be more important to you than
that!
> >
> > I think little Robbies' inner voice just gave us a little

insight

> why he took up that gambling career so young.
>
> This is the no-spin zone as O'Reillt says. Try to keep in bounds.

Your inner voice is always "in bounds".

> >
> > > >
> > > > > stress limits, failure analysis, and reliability claims
> until
> > > they
> > > > > showed me absolute proof or non-arguable analysis that

they

> > > indeed
> > > > > were correct. Most of them were, and the few who weren't
> were
> > the
> > > > > repeat offenders and were eventually walked out. YOU

remind

> me
> > of
> > > > > those phonies. You touch on a claim and then ramble on

with

> > > opinion
> > > > > that's never supported with anything. You just don't fit

in

> > here.
> > > >
> > > > LMAO. This babbling continues.
> > >
> > > And you're just not cut out to 'belong' to the video poker
> > community.
> > > (Oooo----that's gotta HURT!). Memories of high school......
> >
> > No. But I think it's pretty clear you think a lot about your

high

> > school days. Was that the high point of your life? Has it been
> down
> > hill ever since? Adults don't tend to put up with abuse like

kids

> do,
> > and I suspect you got the ax more than once for exactly that
> behavior.
>
> And why did he just dance around the ridicule I just laid on him??

Because it was another asserted lie. I guess you're still so
frustrated you can't understand these lies will never have any

impact

on me. What's really nice about them is how they always lead into
your inner voice's opinion. That rocks.

> >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You know, I would have thought those losing up to $50K
> would
> > > take
> > > > a
> > > > > > bit more than "nickel" play. LMAO.
> > > > >
> > > > > ??? So would anyone!
> > > >
> > > > Aparently not you. Why did you say "bunch of 5c players"?
> > >
> > > Because that's what they are. A Dancer here and a Dancer

there

> > might
> > > skew your graph. not mine.
> >
> > Another admission of lying. Thank you.
>
> If that's how you want it. But the truth seems to bother you, and
it
> comes at you in a non-stop pace.

It comes FROM me. Please try to keep up.

> >
> > > >
> > > > Every GURU loses
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Lie.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Denial. Get with modern times.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your lies are old hat. My refutation of another one of
> your
> > > lies above makes that all too clear.
> > > > >
> > > > > Every guru loses. Prove me wrong. Let's see it. Or will

you

> > take
> > > > your escape route of 'lie' again!!
> > > >
> > > > That's not the issue. The issue is your claim that no one

on

> > VPfree
> > > > ever admits they lose. I proved you wrong. What more can I
say.
> > >
> > > "No one ever admits"---HAHA!! You think those sales people

and

> ego-
> > > math nuts are EVER going to admit losing their behinds in
> PUBLIC??
> > > Just think of your own situation built on lies, addiction and
> the
> > > need to justify your disease. They're stuck in the same no-

way-

> out
> > > rut as you. Add it up and figure it out.
> >
> > I see you're back to babbling after being caught in another

lie.

> > Anyone surprised?
>
> Dancing around the facts again---you could have at least allowed
> yourself to let me see you whimper at the truth again.

Notice once again ... First, the asserted lie; then "---"; then

RIV.

It happens almost every time.

> >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > and it's the same for everyone who insists on
> > > > > > > > > playing your goofy system.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > First of all, it's not my "system". It's the
> > mathematically
> > > > > > proven
> > > > > > > > way to maximize your chances of winnng over time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's your system if you're stupid enough to follow

it.

> > > > > >
> > > > > > RIV. I think Robs' inner voice is commenting on those

who

> > would
> > > > > > choose to follow his progressive con system.
> > > > >
> > > > > Another loss for wording. That's OK. Keep using your

goofy

> > system
> > > > and soon you'll have 90 royals!
> > > >
> > > > Don't worry, I will. PS. I've already had more than 90

royals.

> > >
> > > HAHA! Dancer said he had over 110 in 6 months! And look how
much
> he
> > > loses after being reeled in to play higher limits because of
> them!
> >
> > Neither you nor I knows whether he wins or loses, which makes
this
> > another one of your many lies.
>
> I know.

Of course you do ...

> You would never want to, and besides, you'd claim some sort
> of phony this or that even with absolute proof before your eyes.

Let's see the "absolute proof".

> You
> have to. How else would you be able to continue on with your
> gambling knowing that your gurus heroes are the biggest losers

out

> there?

I wouldn't care. I'm winning and so are many others.

> Although I do really suspect you understand that they do
> lose....just as you lose.

Asserted lie.

> All the time and tons of dinero. And all
> because of that goofy system you habitually follow.

RIV. Like I said, it works every time

>
> > Oh BTW, I'll brag about only having ONE RF this
> > > > > > > year---but I'm up over $33k. 3 quik trips with very
> little play-completely the opposite of your pathological gambling
> trips back and forth and back and forth.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hmmm. What happened to those win goals?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hit all 3 times. Doesn't that just BURN you!?
> > > >
> > > > $2500*3 = $7500. $33K and $7.5K are miles apart even with

one

> RF.
> > > > Now, would little Robbie lie to us? LMAO.
> > >
> > > And i though you understood my win goals. Leave it to you
> > > to 'minimalize' the 3 wins to the minimum!
> >
> > What'sa matter Biffy-boy? The facts pointing out another one of
> your lies? I didn't say your results had to be exactly $7500, I
just
> noted the HUGH descrepancy.
>
> You mean huge I think. If so, what's you mean by 'discrepancy',
> little dicky?? Anything over $2500/trip is valid. You know that.

I also know the average win, including all RFs, is around $5K. So,

I

do believe we can chalk up another lie.

> I
> do believe you're envious once again. Happens every time I hit

you

> with my results. Higher limits = big jackpots--make sense yet?

Perfect sense, if it comes out of your mouth it's probably a lie.

> Only
> thing is, you can't seem to get staying on at the machines and
> playing until the missus comes after you with the rolling pin.

Not

> my bag, little dicky. That's why I'm the best ever!

RIV.

> >
> > > >
> > > > > > > And I see you are behind,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Obvious LIE, since you have no way of knowing. However,
to
> > keep
> > > > the
> > > > > > record straight, my wife and I are $8306 ahead.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yup! Just like the Queen and her live-in ol lover and
Dancer
> > and
> > > > his transformed wife, you guys all follow the same path of
> lies
> > and
> > > > > deception.
> > > >
> > > > Just the facts, as usual.
> > >
> > > the facts of deception in your quest to 'belong'.
> >
> > That would be a contradictory phrase. Nice try to sound like

me,

> but
> > it came out all wrong.
>
> Yours is the only tongue that's twisted. It's all part of your

show

> here.

Just the facts, as usual.

> >
> > > >
> > > > > One way to tell a nervous record report is in how the
> > > > > defendant incorporates another person into the formula.

You

> > > people
> > > > > have so little self-confidence in what you're lying about
> that
> > > you
> > > > > need the comfort on mentioning another person along with
> your
> > > lie.
> > > > > Transparent as a surfboy wearing baggies on the beach.....
> > > >
> > > > No, I could break it down for you but I just grabbed the
> total.
> > As
> > > it turns out were both ahead about the same.
> > >
> > > Yup....just like almost every gambler alive comes back 'about
> > even'.
> > > It's the easy way out little dicky. Get with the program.
> >
> > I said "ahead", not "about even". Your wishes have no place in
the
> > world of facts. However, to be exact I'm $4430 ahead and my

wife

> is
> > ahead the rest of the $8306. Like I said ... about the same.
>
> Yup, just as I said and expected: We're both about the
same....i.e.,
> we're EVEN!

Asserted lie ...

> It's like a contest. A shameful contest.

RIV. This is so easy.

> >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > And the missus---why she's so
> > > > > > > excited she went out to celebrate by 'taking a shot'

at

> the
> > > > high-limit DOLLAR machines!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nope, I sometimes play dollars and I play .50 quite
often.
> > She
> > > > ONLY
> > > > > > plays quarters. Are you ever right?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, and you're lying. She's a Dancer fan and everyone
knows
> he
> > > > plays
> > > > > waaaay beyond his bankroll. You two are the epitome of

that

> > > disease.
> > > >
> > > > No, she dislikes Dancer. Are you ever right?
> > >
> > > Where in the world would she EVER have time to dislike

Dancer??

> >
> > Just once through a greeting line at Fiesta was all it took.
>
> I don't disagree with that. Most people recognize a phony when

they

> meet face to face.

It was the way he treated everyone. Very arrogant.

> >
> > > And
> > > if you've poisoned her about him too, then she's only your
> puppet
> > on
> > > this and you're using her again. But that's OK. I know she
> respects
> > > and likes me for my honesty and forthrightedness.
> >
> > ROTFLMAO. She knows nothing about you. Why would she? You are a
> > nobody. However, she does like Jean Scott.
>
> Now THAT's a LOW BLOW!!

Just the facts, as usual.

> >
> > > For all i know she
> > > could be one of my biggest fans who writes to me all the

time!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

> > > Wouldn't that be a kick--she actually has her own mind and a
> brain
> > to
> > > go along with it! Would that disturb you or what!
> >
> > Da plane, da plane.
>
> Da fan....da fan!

I can tell you really need one, even your inner voice dislikes you.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > > I don't think that has yet been determined. The IRS only
> asked
> > > for
> > > > > clarification. So, not an issue. We're back to your lies

as

> > the
> > > > only issue.
> > > >
> > > > You thinking is another in a long line of the mistakes

YOU'VE

> > made
> > > > since you've allowed gambling to curse the lives of you &

the

> > > missus.
> > >
> > > I see you agree. Now, admit your lies. It's a good start on

the

> > road
> > > to recovery.
> > >
> > > > Obviously, not an issue to you because you're not walking

in

> her
> > > > shoes. She's rightfully concerned, and the reason is

crystal

> > clear.
> > >
> > > Concerned, yes. An issue, no. Now, if and when the IRS denies
her
> > > claims, then that would be an issue. Try to keep up.
> >
> > Isn't it just like an addicted gambler in denial to

procrastinate

> in
> > making things right, and make believe it'll all just 'go away".
> > Thaty's why the majority of you fools have so many problems in
> life. Moral, physical, emotional, you name it. RIP.

Can't answer that one. big surprise.

Answer what? You stated with an "asserted lie" and followed it with
RIV (or RIP). You should be happy I let you off the hook.

> > > > If they go after more money from her and her husband that

she

> > > likely
> > > > sneaks money from at every turn, she won't have much to
gamble
> > with
> > > > any more. Now just THINK of the position a scenario like

that

> > would
> > > > put YOU into! Pathological gambling addicts don't respond
well
> > to
> > > not
> > > > having cash around any longer. That's her true concern.
> > >
> > > Do you really have to be so foolish? The worst that can

happen

is
> > she
> > > is forced to claim all the w2gs on her 1040 and possibly lose
> some
> > > deductions. Of course, that's no worse than if she had

started

> > with
> > > that approach. The other possibility is the IRS says OK and

she

> > pays
> > > less in taxes.
> >
> > Always looking at the bright side of an IRS inquiry. That's
another
> > addict mistake. Minimalizing the consequences even before they
> > appear. The bottom line is, she and her googly-eyed hubby are

in

> > deep poop, and if they're not this time then they've been in

the

> > past and they'll be there again in the future. Live with it.
>
> It is nice to see little Robbie could not come up with

anything ...

> again. Just more asserted lies. I hope you read that proverb.

You can keep on looking at the bright side for her because you're

not

involved in THIS one. But my guess is you'll find out soon enough
what she's worried about.

I doubt it. As long as she kept good records there is nothing to
worry about.

Addicts all lie on their tax returns

Here's the asserted lie and RIV all in one sentence.

because they're addicted to BIG CHECKS from anywhere just so they

can

feed the machines. One thing--at least she's honest about her
results.

She lies on her tax returns but tells the truth on VPfree. That makes
a lot of sense.

She's miles ahead of you on that one. Read it again--it's
all true. And here's another you can check out for yourself--and
sorry to prove you wrong again. Go to the vpFREE luncheon pics from

a

few years ago and you'll see Mr. googlyeyes right before your eyes!

I've already seen your picture.

> Nope. Nice try. Answer the question. Of course, you know as well

as

I
> do that your answer invalidates everything you wrote.

I guess Robbie gave up on this one. Chalk up another one for the
truth.

> > > > > > Hit all 3 times. Doesn't that just BURN you!?
> > > > >
> > > > > $2500*3 = $7500. $33K and $7.5K are miles apart even with
one
> > RF.
> > > > > Now, would little Robbie lie to us? LMAO.
> > > >
> > > > And i though you understood my win goals. Leave it to you
> > > > to 'minimalize' the 3 wins to the minimum!
> > >
> > > What'sa matter Biffy-boy? The facts pointing out another one

of

> > your lies? I didn't say your results had to be exactly $7500, I
> just
> > noted the HUGH descrepancy.
> >
> > You mean huge I think. If so, what's you mean by 'discrepancy',
> > little dicky?? Anything over $2500/trip is valid. You know

that.

>
> I also know the average win, including all RFs, is around $5K.

So,

I
> do believe we can chalk up another lie.

Yup. It appears little Robbie has given up.

Little dicky, you know it's OK to simply give up instead of
scribbling 'riv' and 'lie' for every truth I write about and embarrass
you with. In this case even though the story's been about a fellow
addict of yours, you were so bothered by the truth and inferences with
the IRS that you inserted your usual array of ruffled feather
statements meant to make you feel somehow 'safer' from the IRS--but all
it did was irritate you even more. You are truly your own worst enemy.
Now I can imagine just how the wife feels about you. When you don't
even respect yourself there's no way you can respect another. Therein
lies the cause of how you've disgraced her very being by turning her
into the pathological gambler you now are. A telling addict's story if
there ever was one.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

Little dicky, you know it's OK to simply give up instead of
scribbling 'riv' and 'lie' for every truth I write about and

embarrass

you with.

Asserted lie.

In this case even though the story's been about a fellow
addict of yours, you were so bothered by the truth and inferences

with

the IRS that you inserted your usual array of ruffled feather
statements meant to make you feel somehow 'safer' from the IRS--but

all

it did was irritate you even more.

Asserted lie.

You are truly your own worst enemy.
Now I can imagine just how the wife feels about you. When you don't
even respect yourself there's no way you can respect another.

Therein

lies the cause of how you've disgraced her very being by turning

her

into the pathological gambler you now are. A telling addict's story

if

there ever was one.

RIV.