Fortunately, both the casino index and VPFREE pay schedule sections
already list the percentage return for each version of each VP game.
That should result in most questions being cleared up with a couple
of mouse clicks. If the "full pay" notation is discarded maybe an
asterisk or some other indicator could be used to designate the most
widely available pay scale for each VP game.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John Douglass" <john.douglass@...>
wrote:
I'm in favor of discontinuing use of the term 'full pay'. It's not
used consistanly. For example, we say FPDW, but 10/7 DB, not FPDB.
And did everyone here know 9/6 DDB was FP, not 10/6?
From: <GRAYTLEEGRAY@...>
To: <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 6, 2007 02:29 PM
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Treasure Island vp question/Full PayIn a message dated 11/6/07 9:45:19 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
vpFae@... writes:> "Full-pay" probably should be re-defined or discarded
> as a term, but I'm not ready to cross that bridge yet
> since a change would require a lot of remedial work
> on the DataBase.
>
>****
I agree about that inertia thing for the database. Just look
at "Bonus
Poker". The 8/5 Bonus (99.16%) goes way back in the history of
VP. Heck the
intial database drew the line at 9/6 Jacks.
In a rare move IGT introduced Bonus Poker on newer platforms with
every quad
enhanced, a bogus Bonus 8/5-35 which usually is found on the
Optimum banks is
better ER than traditional Bonus 8/5. How about the 9/6-90 Jacks?
Some of the best "fullpay"paytables manufactured don't exist
anymore, Bally,
Sigma and even IGT. Is 17/10 Loose Deuces even included as a
option on the
newest Game Kings?
BS <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> See
what's new at http://www.aol.com
ยทยทยท
------Original Message------
</HTML>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm
Yahoo! Groups Links