In a message dated 11/6/07 9:45:19 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
vpFae@Cox.net writes:
···
"Full-pay" probably should be re-defined or discarded
as a term, but I'm not ready to cross that bridge yet
since a change would require a lot of remedial work
on the DataBase.
****
I agree about that inertia thing for the database. Just look at "Bonus
Poker". The 8/5 Bonus (99.16%) goes way back in the history of VP. Heck the
intial database drew the line at 9/6 Jacks.
In a rare move IGT introduced Bonus Poker on newer platforms with every quad
enhanced, a bogus Bonus 8/5-35 which usually is found on the Optimum banks is
better ER than traditional Bonus 8/5. How about the 9/6-90 Jacks?
Some of the best "fullpay"paytables manufactured don't exist anymore, Bally,
Sigma and even IGT. Is 17/10 Loose Deuces even included as a option on the
newest Game Kings?
BS <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> See what's new at http://www.aol.com
</HTML>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]