In a message dated 9/20/06 9:03:13 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
deuceswild1000@yahoo.com writes:
http://www.rgtonline.com/Article.cfm?
ArticleId=67576&CategoryName=Gaming%20Life
*****
First, they say it was a computer error in favor of the player.
But the more important issue is they were goint to invalidate a jackpot
because he was playing on Daddy's card.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
It seems casinos can make any rules they can think of; or do these
rules come under the purview of the gaming commissions?
If the display shows you won, it seems to me they have to pay you.
Apparently not, as far as the Casinos and the Gaming Commissions are
concerned.
Suppose the person in question was playing with his father's card, or
his wife's, or there was a card in the machine left by someone, and
he didn't bother. Why should that negate a wager made and a jackpot
won?
What other rule violations would entitle the Casino to renege on
paying off?
What if he was smoking in a non-smoking section of the casino?
Or not smoking in a smokers only section?
Or playing on two adjacent machines?
Or playing in the Diamond Cove, with a Gold Card?
Or ....
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, GRAYTLEEGRAY@... wrote:
First, they say it was a computer error in favor of the player.
But the more important issue is they were goint to invalidate a
jackpot because he was playing on Daddy's card.