vpFREE2 Forums

There is only one remotely interesting topic worth debating about Rob Singer:

#1

Like progressions, Singers "ideas" have been beaten to death on every
forum he's ever visited.

It is impossible to make a series of negative ev bets add up to a
positive.
Varying the bet sizes makes no difference.

This topic has been analyzed and overanalyzed.
Further discussion of it is like further discussion of the medieval
alchemists' theories of how to make gold out of various ingredients.

Singer is an internet attention whore par excellence.

The only remotely interesting topic re: Singer -

Is he truly a total moron?

#2

Interesting that you don't write directly at me and try to make
believe you're using an 'audience' to make yourself feel good about
the baloney you post. I hate to repeat this, but you show all the
classic signs of a jealous, unsuccessful gambler who has an axe to
grind with successful people who know what they're doing and what
they're talking about. Your repititious nonsense about negative bets
belongs right where you got it from--in Dan Paymar's boring books.

Like progressions, Singers "ideas" have been beaten to death on

every

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "jw776655" <jw776655@y...> wrote:

forum he's ever visited.

It is impossible to make a series of negative ev bets add up to a
positive.
Varying the bet sizes makes no difference.

This topic has been analyzed and overanalyzed.
Further discussion of it is like further discussion of the medieval
alchemists' theories of how to make gold out of various ingredients.

Singer is an internet attention whore par excellence.

The only remotely interesting topic re: Singer -

Is he truly a total moron?

#3

Now there's your basic singer:anybody who makes an
obvious criticism is "jealous".

···

--- rsing1111 <rsinger1111@cox.net> wrote:

Interesting that you don't write directly at me and
try to make
believe you're using an 'audience' to make yourself
feel good about
the baloney you post. I hate to repeat this, but you
show all the
classic signs of a jealous, unsuccessful gambler who
has an axe to
grind with successful people who know what they're
doing and what
they're talking about. Your repititious nonsense
about negative bets
belongs right where you got it from--in Dan Paymar's
boring books.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "jw776655"
<jw776655@y...> wrote:
>
> Like progressions, Singers "ideas" have been
beaten to death on
every
> forum he's ever visited.
>
> It is impossible to make a series of negative ev
bets add up to a
> positive.
> Varying the bet sizes makes no difference.
>
> This topic has been analyzed and overanalyzed.
> Further discussion of it is like further
discussion of the medieval
> alchemists' theories of how to make gold out of
various ingredients.
>
> Singer is an internet attention whore par
excellence.
>
>
> The only remotely interesting topic re: Singer -
>
> Is he truly a total moron?
>

__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com