vpFREE2 Forums

TAXES:::: Something New

9. TAXES:::: Something New
Posted by: "denflo60" dennis.florence@worldnet.att.net denflo60
Date: Thu Mar 1, 2007 4:02 pm ((PST))

...

The man at the desk appear completely bewildered as I gave him all
the legal paperwork. He immediately got on the telephone to figure
out what to do. To make a long story short, I was not allowed to
play as a Corporation with an EIN number. Over my 6 evening stay I
just played $5.00 single play JorB to minimize W2G's to staight or
royal flushes. My accountant talked to their people but he was never
told by the Casino WHY. I had previously dealt with Director of
Marketing Pete Landy who was very helpful to me previously on 2006
tax info and questions. After several discussions of "We are looking
into it", which I happen to believe, I finally concluded that it was
a Casino policy and procedure that prevented them from letting me
play and not a Federal, state or gambling commission law. They told
me I was the first person to ever ask them this question. With all
the discussion on this blog that seemed impossible to me unless I am
one of only a few high rolling VP players that come fronm a state
where gambling losses are not deductable.
What do you folks out there say about this. I like Wynn, I have been
happy with Wynn and I'd like to stay there. I have been led to
believe I would have the same problem at any Casino in Vegas. Can
anyone or any casino refute this? If I can play somewhere else I
would consider it given similar comps. If everyone does it the same
way I will just stop gambling as I have plenty of other hobbies to
keep me busy. I am hoping in a few months Wynn will alter their
policy and let me play. Pete Landy and I jokingly agreed that I
should write the next book on Video Poker and gambling.
Denny

I don't know about your specific situation, but I have often encountered something similar. A friend and I play "partners" when we play video poker together -- sometimes two machines side by side, sometimes on higher denominations taking turns (details as to when we rotate machine operation irrelevant here), but working out of a common "kitty" to which we each contribute equal amounts, with the understanding that we'll split our winnings (or, of course, more commonly, our losses). We've even done this with a third and/or fourth person on occasion.

I've also played poker tournaments with "backers" having a portion of my action, same idea.

Needless to say, we don't want whoever is the lucky one at video poker, or just me for the tournaments, to get hit with the taxes for W2Gs, and with each of us in different brackets, deciding how to work it out on our own is difficult.

The IRS provides Form 5754 for such situations -- the player enters his/her name, address, etc., and tax id, and also puts on the form all the others to whom payment is to be made, with their identifying information, and how the prize is to be split. The casino is then supposed to accept that form, issue the payment as directed, and issue a W2G to EACH person listed, so each person is responsible for their share of the taxes.

The Form 5754 does NOT go to the IRS; it is for the payer's records.

I've not yet received a payment when all the recipients were not there, so I don't know if they would give me checks made out to them for me to deliver, mail them checks, or what, if that would happen.

Anyway, like you, we often run into casino personnel, including the "highest" person on the slot floor, who say "we don't do that". The directions on the back of the form explain that the form "enables" the payer to make the payments as directed, but does not say that they MUST do so (it DOES say that if I receive a payment for someone else or as a member of a group, that I "must" complete the form).

Even with this loophole for them, I have been successful by explaining to them that they MUST comply with the provisions of the form, and that I would hate to bring IRS attention to their casino by writing the IRS and telling them that their casino refused to do this - a bluff which has always worked.

If they have an accounting dept., that's where the expertise is to understand how the form works; perhaps you can ask them to provide a contact in their own accounting dept. whom your accountant can call and share his thought process and research and any references, etc. -- and then, of course, it is still the casino's decision as to how to implement it -- but IF the IRS regs in any way REQUIRE them to comply with your request, you can try my "threat of a letter" technique, and it might even work if the regs do NOT require it.

Incidentally, the Form 5754 says "the taxpayer identification number for an individual is the social security number or individual tax identification number; for all others it is the employer identification number" -- so there MAY be something in the IRS regs that prohibits an individual receiving a payment from using an employer identification number. That said, perhaps you could use the Form 5754 to "split" your winnings between yourself and your "business entity"; ask your accountant if that would work.

I'm not an accountant myself, so I'm just guessing on that last idea.

--BG

···

=============

> 9. TAXES:::: Something New
> Posted by: "denflo60" dennis.florence@... denflo60
> Date: Thu Mar 1, 2007 4:02 pm ((PST))
>
...
> The man at the desk appear completely bewildered as I gave him

all

> the legal paperwork. He immediately got on the telephone to

figure

> out what to do. To make a long story short, I was not allowed to
> play as a Corporation with an EIN number. Over my 6 evening stay

I

> just played $5.00 single play JorB to minimize W2G's to staight

or

> royal flushes. My accountant talked to their people but he was

never

> told by the Casino WHY. I had previously dealt with Director of
> Marketing Pete Landy who was very helpful to me previously on

2006

> tax info and questions. After several discussions of "We are

looking

> into it", which I happen to believe, I finally concluded that it

was

> a Casino policy and procedure that prevented them from letting me
> play and not a Federal, state or gambling commission law. They

told

> me I was the first person to ever ask them this question. With

all

> the discussion on this blog that seemed impossible to me unless I

am

> one of only a few high rolling VP players that come fronm a state
> where gambling losses are not deductable.
> What do you folks out there say about this. I like Wynn, I have

been

> happy with Wynn and I'd like to stay there. I have been led to
> believe I would have the same problem at any Casino in Vegas. Can
> anyone or any casino refute this? If I can play somewhere else I
> would consider it given similar comps. If everyone does it the

same

> way I will just stop gambling as I have plenty of other hobbies

to

> keep me busy. I am hoping in a few months Wynn will alter their
> policy and let me play. Pete Landy and I jokingly agreed that I
> should write the next book on Video Poker and gambling.
> Denny
>

I don't know about your specific situation, but I have often

encountered something similar. A friend and I play "partners" when
we play video poker together -- sometimes two machines side by side,
sometimes on higher denominations taking turns (details as to when we
rotate machine operation irrelevant here), but working out of a
common "kitty" to which we each contribute equal amounts, with the
understanding that we'll split our winnings (or, of course, more
commonly, our losses). We've even done this with a third and/or
fourth person on occasion.

I've also played poker tournaments with "backers" having a portion

of my action, same idea.

Needless to say, we don't want whoever is the lucky one at video

poker, or just me for the tournaments, to get hit with the taxes for
W2Gs, and with each of us in different brackets, deciding how to work
it out on our own is difficult.

The IRS provides Form 5754 for such situations -- the player enters

his/her name, address, etc., and tax id, and also puts on the form
all the others to whom payment is to be made, with their identifying
information, and how the prize is to be split. The casino is then
supposed to accept that form, issue the payment as directed, and
issue a W2G to EACH person listed, so each person is responsible for
their share of the taxes.

The Form 5754 does NOT go to the IRS; it is for the payer's records.

I've not yet received a payment when all the recipients were not

there, so I don't know if they would give me checks made out to them
for me to deliver, mail them checks, or what, if that would happen.

Anyway, like you, we often run into casino personnel, including

the "highest" person on the slot floor, who say "we don't do that".
The directions on the back of the form explain that the
form "enables" the payer to make the payments as directed, but does
not say that they MUST do so (it DOES say that if I receive a payment
for someone else or as a member of a group, that I "must" complete
the form).

Even with this loophole for them, I have been successful by

explaining to them that they MUST comply with the provisions of the
form, and that I would hate to bring IRS attention to their casino by
writing the IRS and telling them that their casino refused to do
this - a bluff which has always worked.

Dear Sir: I have every confidence that the Wynn will study this
issue in depth. My accountant has talked to their people and I
believe after several months they will have a response for me.
Having been part of a very large Corporation for 36 years and part of
management it takes a while to change your Policies and Procedures
Manual. Denny

If they have an accounting dept., that's where the expertise is to

understand how the form works; perhaps you can ask them to provide a
contact in their own accounting dept. whom your accountant can call
and share his thought process and research and any references, etc. --
and then, of course, it is still the casino's decision as to how to
implement it -- but IF the IRS regs in any way REQUIRE them to comply
with your request, you can try my "threat of a letter" technique, and
it might even work if the regs do NOT require it.

Incidentally, the Form 5754 says "the taxpayer identification

number for an individual is the social security number or individual
tax identification number; for all others it is the employer
identification number" -- so there MAY be something in the IRS regs
that prohibits an individual receiving a payment from using an
employer identification number. That said, perhaps you could use the
Form 5754 to "split" your winnings between yourself and
your "business entity"; ask your accountant if that would work.

I'm not an accountant myself, so I'm just guessing on that last

idea.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, b.glazer@... wrote:

--BG

=============

I have had some experience with Form 5754 and team play.

First of all, on the whole, casinos do not like the idea of "teams." The reason for this seems to be an unwillingness to cope with the extra paperwork AND the perception that a "team" means the players are "experts."

However, there are exceptions. When we were in the million dollar tournament at Caesars (and the same for all Caesars big tournaments), it was stated in the written rules: "If you are playing as a team, your team member's name must be listed. All monies won will be payable to the main player. It is the responsibility of that player to distribute winnings to their partner. Main player is responsible for all applicable taxes."

Therefore, when Brad won the 1/2 mil, although he asked if they could split the payoff by using a Form 5754, they said that was not their policy. This problem was easily solved, however, at the end of the year by Brad issuing a 1099 to his partner.

I know gambling partners who regularly go the 1099 route. Whoever actually wins W2G jackpot gives the casino his SS# but at the end of the year they give 1099s to each other as needed. This is a complicated method, of course, and requires very accurate recordkeeping! But "advantage" players want to keep a low profile so wouldn't want to tell the casino they are a team.

There is lots of partnering in live poker. Some casinos will be good about issuing Form 5754s but others may balk. The casinos really don't like publicity about partnering in poker, especially if there is a court fight like in the last World Series of Poker! The casinos like big-money winners and it dilutes the punch of the publicity when there is information that players at the final table have cut a deal. It also takes the suspense out of final-table play if spectators figure it really doesn't matter how they play their hands if they are going to split the money evenly anyway.

On the subject of S Corps: There is probably a reduced chance of being audited than if you used a Schedule C. We have had a S Corp for many years and haven't been audited yet - but that doesn't mean we won't be. Of course, Brad and I aren't typical "professional gamblers" since we have a stronger basis for this because of my writings.

···

________________________________________
Jean $¢ott - "FRUGAL VIDEO POKER"
This new book (autographed) and other
   frugal products are now available at my
   new Web site, http://queenofcomps.com/.
   E-mail address is queenofcomps@cox.net.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]