vpFREE2 Forums

Taxes and citizenship, was another W2G question...

7.4. Re: another W2G question...
Date: Tue Jan 6, 2009 7:35 am ((PST))

True. But it is my understanding that my tax dollars are used for
more than just guaranteeing my right to eventually return (and use
U.S. embassies when traveling abroad, and a few other "perks" of
owning a U.S. passport). The U.S. is the only country in the world
that taxes its non-residents. And without starting another political
discussion, it's been getting worse and can't see it getting better
any time soon given the current deficit...

I expect this discussion will be barred from the list before too much longer, but before it is...

All of us who pay taxes support some governmental activities which we would not otherwise support with our money. This is also true when we join organizations, which spend our dues dollars in ways that we might not otherwise choose.

If you want to boycott the country, or any other organization, you can "drop your membership" - in the case of citizenship, it might involve a requirement to "join" a different country -- where I expect you'll again find yourself taxed, possibly at a higher rate than here.

Maybe you can start your own country :slight_smile:

But if there is a better way, and you're unhappy with your US citizenship and US taxes, I'm sure there are solutions for you -- and if you have not availed yourself of them, I'm sure there are reasons for that as well.

--BG

···

================

Obviously what you say is true, and I am not unhappy to be an
American citizen. And I would gladly pay some taxes for those rights
that I maintain. But can anyone really say it is fair to pay a full
complement of taxes when you don't live in the country? And if you
do somehow think it is fair, then how can you justify the fact that
the U.S. also fully taxes foreigners who live and work in the U.S.
Come on, you can't have it both ways!

> 7.4. Re: another W2G question...
> Date: Tue Jan 6, 2009 7:35 am ((PST))
>
> True. But it is my understanding that my tax dollars are used for
> more than just guaranteeing my right to eventually return (and

use

> U.S. embassies when traveling abroad, and a few other "perks" of
> owning a U.S. passport). The U.S. is the only country in the

world

> that taxes its non-residents. And without starting another

political

> discussion, it's been getting worse and can't see it getting

better

> any time soon given the current deficit...
>

I expect this discussion will be barred from the list before too

much longer, but before it is...

All of us who pay taxes support some governmental activities which

we would not otherwise support with our money. This is also true
when we join organizations, which spend our dues dollars in ways that
we might not otherwise choose.

If you want to boycott the country, or any other organization, you

can "drop your membership" - in the case of citizenship, it might
involve a requirement to "join" a different country -- where I expect
you'll again find yourself taxed, possibly at a higher rate than here.

Maybe you can start your own country :slight_smile:

But if there is a better way, and you're unhappy with your US

citizenship and US taxes, I'm sure there are solutions for you -- and
if you have not availed yourself of them, I'm sure there are reasons
for that as well.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, b.glazer@... wrote:

--BG

================

It isn't a "pay as you use it" system for U.S. citizens. I don't get to pick and choose what taxes I pay based on what I use. If I didn't visit a national park in 2008 I don't get to deduct a portion of my tax obligation for not availing myself of a portion of the services the government provides. I chose to not visit a national park last year, but I could have gone to my heart's content. You choose to live outside the country. Nothing wrong with your decision at all, but it's your decision.

Obviously what you say is true, and I am not unhappy to be an American citizen. And I would gladly pay some taxes for those rights that I maintain. But can anyone really say it is fair to pay a full complement of taxes when you don't live in the country? And if you do somehow think it is fair, then how can you justify the fact that the U.S. also fully taxes foreigners who live and work in the U.S. Come on, you can't have it both ways!--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, b.glazer@... wrote:>> > 7.4. Re: another W2G question... > > Date: Tue Jan 6, 2009 7:35 am ((PST)) > > > > True. But it is my understanding that my tax dollars are used for > > more than just guaranteeing my right to eventually return (and use > > U.S. embassies when traveling abroad, and a few other "perks" of > > owning a U.S. passport). The U.S. is the only country in the world > > that taxes its non-residents. And without starting another political > > discussion, it's been getting worse and can't see it getting better > > any time soon given the current deficit... > > > > I expect this discussion will be barred from the list before too much longer, but before it is...> > All of us who pay taxes support some governmental activities which we would not otherwise support with our money. This is also true when we join organizations, which spend our dues dollars in ways that we might not otherwise choose.> > If you want to boycott the country, or any other organization, you can "drop your membership" - in the case of citizenship, it might involve a requirement to "join" a different country -- where I expect you'll again find yourself taxed, possibly at a higher rate than here.> > Maybe you can start your own country :)> > But if there is a better way, and you're unhappy with your US citizenship and US taxes, I'm sure there are solutions for you -- and if you have not availed yourself of them, I'm sure there are reasons for that as well.> > --BG> > ================>

···

To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.comFrom: larsonsm@yahoo.comDate: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:22:21 +0000Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Taxes and citizenship, was another W2G question...

_________________________________________________________________
Windows LiveTM: Keep your life in sync.
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_allup_explore_012009

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I am not a tax expert, but the so called foreign earned income
exclusion for 2009 went up from $87,000 to $91,000. This is the
amount of their pay Americans living and working abroad are eligible
to exclude from US income taxes. Most US citizens living and working
abroad are NOT paying the full complement of US taxes.

I feel that paying taxes on gambling jackpots just because you do not
itemize is about the biggest ripoff there is. A new ripoff is that it
can greatly increase the amount of your Medicare premium even if you
itemize because your Medicare premium is now based on your AGI and not
your taxable income.

Chris

It isn't a "pay as you use it" system for U.S. citizens. I don't

get to pick and choose what taxes I pay based on what I use. If I
didn't visit a national park in 2008 I don't get to deduct a portion
of my tax obligation for not availing myself of a portion of the
services the government provides. I chose to not visit a national
park last year, but I could have gone to my heart's content. You
choose to live outside the country. Nothing wrong with your decision
at all, but it's your decision.

To: vpFREE@...: larsonsm@...: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:22:21 +0000Subject:

[vpFREE] Re: Taxes and citizenship, was another W2G question...

Obviously what you say is true, and I am not unhappy to be an

American citizen. And I would gladly pay some taxes for those rights
that I maintain. But can anyone really say it is fair to pay a full
complement of taxes when you don't live in the country? And if you do
somehow think it is fair, then how can you justify the fact that the
U.S. also fully taxes foreigners who live and work in the U.S. Come
on, you can't have it both ways!--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com,
b.glazer@ wrote:>> > 7.4. Re: another W2G question... > > Date: Tue
Jan 6, 2009 7:35 am ((PST)) > > > > True. But it is my understanding
that my tax dollars are used for > > more than just guaranteeing my
right to eventually return (and use > > U.S. embassies when traveling
abroad, and a few other "perks" of > > owning a U.S. passport). The
U.S. is the only country in the world > > that taxes its non-
residents. And without starting another political > > discussion, it's
been getting worse and can't see it getting better > > any time soon
given the current deficit... > > > > I expect this discussion will be
barred from the list before too much longer, but before it is...> >
All of us who pay taxes support some governmental activities which we
would not otherwise support with our money. This is also true when we
join organizations, which spend our dues dollars in ways that we might
not otherwise choose.> > If you want to boycott the country, or any
other organization, you can "drop your membership" - in the case of
citizenship, it might involve a requirement to "join" a different
country -- where I expect you'll again find yourself taxed, possibly
at a higher rate than here.> > Maybe you can start your own country
:)> > But if there is a better way, and you're unhappy with your US
citizenship and US taxes, I'm sure there are solutions for you -- and
if you have not availed yourself of them, I'm sure there are reasons
for that as well.> > --BG> > ================>

_________________________________________________________________
Windows LiveTM: Keep your life in sync.
http://windowslive.com/explore?

ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_allup_explore_012009

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, David Silvus <djsilvus@...> wrote:

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I expect this to be my last post on this non-VP topic, but I have to
say I am a bit surprised by all of the defenders of the U.S. tax
system (a system that is almost universally recognized as being at
best unnecessarily complex and inefficient).

Of course I know it's not a pay as you use it system. And I won't be
one of those retirees that complains about my taxes going to the
local schools despite the fact that my kids will be long out of
them. I understand that people in Nevada and Florida (among other
states) don't pay state income tax because of the tourists in those
states. Is that fair? Who's to say? I realize that taxes are for
the greater good, in fact I probably lean toward socialist views more
than the average person. But the U.S. tax system is extremely
unfair, not just for my situation. Does it make sense that machine
gamblers get W2G's but not table players? Or that the threshold
hasn't increased with inflation (the paperwork of the W2G is another
fine example of IRS efficiency!). Does it make sense that the rich
people can take advantage of all the loopholes? I challenge anyone
to make the case for taxing the income of both U.S. citizens living
and working abroad and ALSO foreigners living and working in the
U.S. And yes there are some exclusions but for many of us that
doesn't even come close to compensating for the higher cost of living
(my rent for a 3-bedroom house is $7500 a month!).

And here's the part that the government doesn't seem to understand.
As you said, it's my decision, and I'm only going to work abroad if
it makes sense for me. But by making it more and more
disadvantageous (the latest was a change to the taxation of deferred
income that was thrown into the big bailout bill Congress passed a
few months ago), companies have to pay more and more to make it
worthwhile for Americans. What do you think these companies are
doing? They are choosing to employ Canadians, Brits, Australians, or
anyone else that can make it work for less money. It costs too much
to make it appealing for Americans (the only reason I still have my
job is that I'm already here and there is a cost to bringing someone
new in). As Congress continues to make these changes, many of the
millions of Americans now living abroad will be moving back to the
States to compete for jobs there. Is that what they want to happen?

Anyway, I don't have the time to continue to argue about the
unfairness of the U.S. tax system! Here's a link to a story that
pretty much sums up the effectiveness of the IRS:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/6193147.html

It isn't a "pay as you use it" system for U.S. citizens. I don't

get to pick and choose what taxes I pay based on what I use. If I
didn't visit a national park in 2008 I don't get to deduct a portion
of my tax obligation for not availing myself of a portion of the
services the government provides. I chose to not visit a national
park last year, but I could have gone to my heart's content. You
choose to live outside the country. Nothing wrong with your decision
at all, but it's your decision.

To: vpFREE@...: larsonsm@...: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:22:21

+0000Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Taxes and citizenship, was another W2G
question...

Obviously what you say is true, and I am not unhappy to be an

American citizen. And I would gladly pay some taxes for those rights
that I maintain. But can anyone really say it is fair to pay a full
complement of taxes when you don't live in the country? And if you do
somehow think it is fair, then how can you justify the fact that the
U.S. also fully taxes foreigners who live and work in the U.S. Come
on, you can't have it both ways!--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com,
b.glazer@ wrote:>> > 7.4. Re: another W2G question... > > Date: Tue
Jan 6, 2009 7:35 am ((PST)) > > > > True. But it is my understanding
that my tax dollars are used for > > more than just guaranteeing my
right to eventually return (and use > > U.S. embassies when traveling
abroad, and a few other "perks" of > > owning a U.S. passport). The
U.S. is the only country in the world > > that taxes its non-
residents. And without starting another political > > discussion,
it's been getting worse and can't see it getting better > > any time
soon given the current deficit... > > > > I expect this discussion
will be barred from the list before too much longer, but before it
is...> > All of us who pay taxes support some governmental activities
which we would not otherwise support with our money. This is also
true when we join organizations, which spend our dues dollars in ways
that we might not otherwise choose.> > If you want to boycott the
country, or any other organization, you can "drop your membership" -
in the case of citizenship, it might involve a requirement to "join"
a different country -- where I expect you'll again find yourself
taxed, possibly at a higher rate than here.> > Maybe you can start
your own country :)> > But if there is a better way, and you're
unhappy with your US citizenship and US taxes, I'm sure there are
solutions for you -- and if you have not availed yourself of them,
I'm sure there are reasons for that as well.> > --BG> >
================>

_________________________________________________________________
Windows LiveTM: Keep your life in sync.
http://windowslive.com/explore?

ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_allup_explore_012009

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, David Silvus <djsilvus@...> wrote:

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I don't think anyone would dispute that a tax system is required to
have a non third world country but the implementation will always be
unfair. This is because politicians implement social polity ( for
example, encourageing home ownership, charitable contributions and
raising children while disouraging market speculation, raiding your
retirement fund too early etc) via tax policy. In addtion, easy
targets (smokers, drinkers, gamblers, ex-pats) get exploited while
harder targets (anyone who can afford a lobbiest) get an easier
ride. Welcome to dollar Democracy. It's also why we'll never have
a flat tax. The pols would lose their ability to grant favors for
money.

P.S. granting that the system is unfair, I've yet to see a better
system. Every other example I've seen in other countries seems too
extreme one way or the other. You either get soaked so every
grandma has a social worker need it or not, or you have dirt roads
in the capital.

I expect this to be my last post on this non-VP topic, but I have

to

say I am a bit surprised by all of the defenders of the U.S. tax
system (a system that is almost universally recognized as being at
best unnecessarily complex and inefficient).

Of course I know it's not a pay as you use it system. And I won't

be

one of those retirees that complains about my taxes going to the
local schools despite the fact that my kids will be long out of
them. I understand that people in Nevada and Florida (among other
states) don't pay state income tax because of the tourists in

those

states. Is that fair? Who's to say? I realize that taxes are

for

the greater good, in fact I probably lean toward socialist views

more

than the average person. But the U.S. tax system is extremely
unfair, not just for my situation. Does it make sense that

machine

gamblers get W2G's but not table players? Or that the threshold
hasn't increased with inflation (the paperwork of the W2G is

another

fine example of IRS efficiency!). Does it make sense that the

rich

people can take advantage of all the loopholes? I challenge

anyone

to make the case for taxing the income of both U.S. citizens

living

and working abroad and ALSO foreigners living and working in the
U.S. And yes there are some exclusions but for many of us that
doesn't even come close to compensating for the higher cost of

living

(my rent for a 3-bedroom house is $7500 a month!).

And here's the part that the government doesn't seem to

understand.

As you said, it's my decision, and I'm only going to work abroad

if

it makes sense for me. But by making it more and more
disadvantageous (the latest was a change to the taxation of

deferred

income that was thrown into the big bailout bill Congress passed a
few months ago), companies have to pay more and more to make it
worthwhile for Americans. What do you think these companies are
doing? They are choosing to employ Canadians, Brits, Australians,

or

anyone else that can make it work for less money. It costs too

much

to make it appealing for Americans (the only reason I still have

my

job is that I'm already here and there is a cost to bringing

someone

new in). As Congress continues to make these changes, many of the
millions of Americans now living abroad will be moving back to the
States to compete for jobs there. Is that what they want to

happen?

Anyway, I don't have the time to continue to argue about the
unfairness of the U.S. tax system! Here's a link to a story that
pretty much sums up the effectiveness of the IRS:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/6193147.html

>
>
> It isn't a "pay as you use it" system for U.S. citizens. I

don't

get to pick and choose what taxes I pay based on what I use. If I
didn't visit a national park in 2008 I don't get to deduct a

portion

of my tax obligation for not availing myself of a portion of the
services the government provides. I chose to not visit a national
park last year, but I could have gone to my heart's content. You
choose to live outside the country. Nothing wrong with your

decision

at all, but it's your decision.
>
>
>
> To: vpFREE@: larsonsm@: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:22:21
+0000Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Taxes and citizenship, was another W2G
question...
>
>
>
> Obviously what you say is true, and I am not unhappy to be an
American citizen. And I would gladly pay some taxes for those

rights

that I maintain. But can anyone really say it is fair to pay a

full

complement of taxes when you don't live in the country? And if you

do

somehow think it is fair, then how can you justify the fact that

the

U.S. also fully taxes foreigners who live and work in the U.S.

Come

on, you can't have it both ways!--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com,
b.glazer@ wrote:>> > 7.4. Re: another W2G question... > > Date:

Tue

Jan 6, 2009 7:35 am ((PST)) > > > > True. But it is my

understanding

that my tax dollars are used for > > more than just guaranteeing

my

right to eventually return (and use > > U.S. embassies when

traveling

abroad, and a few other "perks" of > > owning a U.S. passport).

The

U.S. is the only country in the world > > that taxes its non-
residents. And without starting another political > > discussion,
it's been getting worse and can't see it getting better > > any

time

soon given the current deficit... > > > > I expect this discussion
will be barred from the list before too much longer, but before it
is...> > All of us who pay taxes support some governmental

activities

which we would not otherwise support with our money. This is also
true when we join organizations, which spend our dues dollars in

ways

that we might not otherwise choose.> > If you want to boycott the
country, or any other organization, you can "drop your

membership" -

in the case of citizenship, it might involve a requirement

to "join"

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "larsonsm" <larsonsm@...> wrote:

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, David Silvus <djsilvus@> wrote:
a different country -- where I expect you'll again find yourself
taxed, possibly at a higher rate than here.> > Maybe you can start
your own country :)> > But if there is a better way, and you're
unhappy with your US citizenship and US taxes, I'm sure there are
solutions for you -- and if you have not availed yourself of them,
I'm sure there are reasons for that as well.> > --BG> >
================>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows LiveTM: Keep your life in sync.
> http://windowslive.com/explore?
ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_allup_explore_012009
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

The solution is the Fair Tax
http://www.fairtax.org/

···

--- On Thu, 1/8/09, larsonsm <larsonsm@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: larsonsm <larsonsm@yahoo.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Taxes and citizenship, was another W2G question...
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, January 8, 2009, 9:52 AM

I expect this to be my last post on this non-VP topic, but I have to
say I am a bit surprised by all of the defenders of the U.S. tax
system (a system that is almost universally recognized as being at
best unnecessarily complex and inefficient) .

Of course I know it's not a pay as you use it system. And I won't be
one of those retirees that complains about my taxes going to the
local schools despite the fact that my kids will be long out of
them. I understand that people in Nevada and Florida (among other
states) don't pay state income tax because of the tourists in those
states. Is that fair? Who's to say?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Fair Tax? My policy: The only fair tax is a tax the other guy pays.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Richard Boozer <reboozer@...> wrote:

The solution is the Fair Tax
http://www.fairtax.org/