You are taking a much too simplistic view of it. This was a management decision. If they thought it out completely I cannot say as I'm not privy to their decision making. But I do know a lot of people that work in the casino industry and have no doubt they are trying to improve their bottom line without removing all their customers.
Casino management, generally, are not stupid people. They are well aware that a change will cause a loss of some customers. However, they are also aware that a small loss in customers will be made up by the extra hold of those that do not leave. If they really wanted to be pigs about it, they would of lowered the pay tables even more, like the strip. By lowering the tables only one notch, they will be losing, what I like to say, is the bottom rung of the customer ladder. These are also the same people that generally try to milk the casino for anything they can get. The result (the casino hopes) is that the overall hold will remain the same while not having to give away everything to get it, thus the bottome line is improved.
Bob Craig
Playing VP in Nevada for over 23 years.
···
From: "cmayhem2001 <cmayhem@aol.com>" <cmayhem@aol.com>
So it is your understanding that the downgrading of VP pay tables at
Suncoast is the result of people asking for comps and accepting
the "freebie crap" that has been offered to them? Where do you get
this information?
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail