vpFREE2 Forums

Streak climbs to 43

My 3 dealt aces, missing the 4th streak continues, up to 43 consecutive
times now. I did hit 2 royals in between and got the aces a few times
holding one or 2 cards, but I can't catch that 4th ace from holding 3.
What's up with that? Go figure.

Scot

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

when you get to 69 you can start worrying.

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Scot Krause" <krauseinvegas@w...>
wrote:

My 3 dealt aces, missing the 4th streak continues, up to 43

consecutive

times now. I did hit 2 royals in between and got the aces a few

times

holding one or 2 cards, but I can't catch that 4th ace from

holding 3.

···

What's up with that? Go figure.

Scot

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Is that a magic number or something, or a personal feat that you
accomplished?

Scot

···

-----Original Message-----
From: timmer [mailto:timm…@…com]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 1:48 PM
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Streak climbs to 43

when you get to 69 you can start worrying.

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Scot Krause" <krauseinvegas@w...>
wrote:

My 3 dealt aces, missing the 4th streak continues, up to 43

consecutive

times now. I did hit 2 royals in between and got the aces a few

times

holding one or 2 cards, but I can't catch that 4th ace from

holding 3.

What's up with that? Go figure.

Scot

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

vpFREE Links:
http://www.west-point.org/users/usma1955/20228/VP/Links.htm

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

My 3 dealt aces, missing the 4th streak continues, up to 43

consecutive

times now. I did hit 2 royals in between and got the aces a few

times

holding one or 2 cards, but I can't catch that 4th ace from holding

3.

What's up with that? Go figure.

Scot

Try 134 three deuces without, um, satisfaction, and then tell me
about frustration.

When I get to 69, I'm certainly not worrying...Seriously, isn't 4
of a kind easier to hit when a pair of a kind, rather than 3 of a
kind?

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "timmer" <timmr21@y...> wrote:

when you get to 69 you can start worrying.

> when you get to 69 you can start worrying.

    When I get to 69, I'm certainly not worrying...Seriously,

isn't 4

of a kind easier to hit when a pair of a kind, rather than 3 of a
kind?

No.

its impossible to hit quads without having 3 of a kind first.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "thejimp1" <thejimp1@e...> wrote:

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "timmer" <timmr21@y...> wrote:

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Scot Krause" <krauseinvegas@w...>
wrote:

My 3 dealt aces, missing the 4th streak continues, up to 43

consecutive times now...<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Here's something that might make you feel a little better - then
again maybe not.

I have put in a lot of play on 50 play machines. It is not at all
unusual to draw a blank (no quads) starting with dealt trips on these
machines. It happens roughly 10% of the time that you start with
trips. In effect, I have just gone 50 consecutive hands with no
quads starting with 3 of a kind every time this happens. And yes,
when it's a "big" hand, like aces in Super Aces BP or deuces in
Deuces Wild, it can be frustrating. But other times starting from
trips the quads will pop up all over the screen, which makes up some
for the whiffs.

Keep trying. You'll get 'em eventually.

EE