vpFREE2 Forums

STATE OF THE UNION....or Casino Visit?

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

>
> A jury verdict of not guilty doesn't mean innocent, it menas not
proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The European term of not proven

is

probably more correct then our term not guilty. I don't think there

are

any intelligent people think OJ is innocent of that brutal double
homicide.

The jury decides whether a person either did it or they didn't. Not
guilty = innocent of all charges. OJ's jury said the evidence

presented

told them HE DID NOT KILL THEM. They weren't asked to play with

words.

Nothing can ever be "proven" unless there's unaltered video tape

and a

confession. My question remains to people who go on saying he's not
innocent: Are you more in tune with 100% of the facts presented

before

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vp_mavin" <vp_mavin@> wrote:
the court than the jury is? What's the reasonable answer here? Of
course. The jury knows more about the case than you.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The stunned look on Barry Sheck's face when the not proven verdict
was read was priceless, even OJ's attorneys knew the evidence against
him went far beyond a reasonable doubt.

"Are you more in tune with 100% of the facts presented before
the court than the jury is? The jury knows more about the case than
you."

The pertinent facts were amply covered in the media, international
coverage, where were you when the trial was going on?

> > > Fact: Kennedy KILLED Mary Jo Kopeckne, and his family helped
sway
> > law
> > > enforcement to wash it all away. No money was paid to anyone.
> >
> > "If (O'Reilly/Kennedy) did something wrong as you say, he'd be
> behind
> > bars right now where he should be if that's the case." Your own
> words moron.
>
> You're confused as usual---or maybe you NEED to act confused so

you

> don't look so stupid. "IF O'Reilly did something wrong" were the
> words--be a good geek and look it up this time.

Your own words moron implied that the system always works. The name
wasn't important to your statement. What part of always don't you
understand? Of course, intelligent people realize the system

falters

over and over. OJ is a prime example. DNA testing has proven that
innocent people have been convicted of crimes they did not do.

Please

continue to respond and make youself look dumber and dumber.

> >
> > > Fact: O'Reilly was ACCUSED of SAYING things that were never
> > > substantiated. O'Reilly countersued the accuser. No money is
> known to have exchanged hands. For as many people that say

O'Reilly

> paid the broad off, there's twicew as many who believe she paid

HIM

> off---whether it be in the form of money or a blow job, doesn't
> matter.
> > >
> > > Whoops little dicky.....sorry to make you eat crow YET AGAIN.
> >
> > LMAO. You must really work overtime to look STUPID. I never
stated
> > anything about O'Reilly. Are you answering your own posts now?

I

> hope that crow tastes good, dufus. You have several more courses
> coming up.
>
> Whooooosh! Striaght over your head!! AGAIN!!!! Are you THAT dumb?
I'd
> cut and paste your original comment(response) that was posted in
> response to multiple words of wisdom by your pal, but I know

you'll

> do it and try to make all this go away anyway.

Please do. This drunken attempt to save face once again will not
work. The rest of us know how to read.

> I've served you enough
> crow in the past

At your own table I presume.

I don't allow gambling degenerates at my table. They tend to want to
hurry up so they exhibit their sickness and go to a casino.

> so I'll let up some here just for you little
> dicky....just for you!

Nice try, dufus. I won't let up because I caught you in a lie ONE
MORE TIME.

Uh-oh!....I'm up against a real BRUTE!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

> Impossible to get anything through to anyone who stays out all
night
> playing video poker. The mind becomes mush after 2 hours. That
> explains why you're all over the map.

Sorry, dufus, I never play VP all night. Are you ever right? Nope.

Ever hear of dicky the denyer.....

> > > If I left it up to you, you'd
> > > marginalize the gourmet restaurants all over the Strip
> > > as "overpriced" and "you're paying for the name" because you
> can't
> > > afford to go to them---which you really could if you didn't
lose
> > all
> > > your money in the cheap joints. I'm betting the acid's really
> > flowing
> > > in that oversized belly right about now!
> >
> > If it's so oversized why are you scared silly to play me in
tennis?
> > Your the biggest coward I've ever encountered. No, go change

your

> > diaper. I know it gets wet every time I mention tennis.
>
> I guess you're feeling pretty silly right about now little dicky!

Nope, because I know you'll never show.

Not a very good loophole when I said I'd be there. With the cash. Now
the question seems to be "Will YOU!?"

> > > If you learned sentence structure in school (oh, that's
> > > right....nerds only cared about statistics, drafting,
> trigonometry
> > > and Latin) you'd figure it out without me giving you thses
hints.
> >
> > Too late. ROTFLMAO. Now, put down that drink and go to bed,

your

> wife will be home soon and she'd prefer you were sleeping.
>
> I know. You're trying to impress that dufus who said he liked

your

> letters instead of responses! I'm so good it really hurts now!

I'm right on target again. Nothing to say, dufus? Did you ever
consider your wife ISN'T working late, but out with a REAL man?

She's right here under the desk like Monica was with your hero. I
know it's been a LOOOONG time, but eventually you'll get the picture.

> I'm wondering if you played 6 hours or 10 from the looks of

things here.

I got home before 4:00PM. (Are you always wrong? Yes.) After that I
have no need to drown my sorrows in an alcoholic frenzy like you

do.

I read your posts, get a good belly laugh, exercise, watch a little
TV and hit the hay (that means go to bed, dufus).

An 'exercize' to you--the one-handed snake dance.

> > > I'll bet you wake up each
> > > morning with a criticizm of your wife rolling out of your
mouth.
> > Just
> > > like get with your plethora of mistakes here, I can hear a

loud

> > SLAP
> > > in the distance. But all is forgiven moments later after you
> > announce
> > > which casino you're taking her to today. Addicts will be
addicts!
> >
> > Have another drink, dufus. Maybe then you could come up with an
> > original line. What? You don't understand what the
word "original" means? I didn't think so.

Did I mention dicky the denyer?

>
> > > > I meant the court of world opinion, dufus.
> > >
> > > Ahumma ahumma ahumma ahumma..... Figure it out first, banana
head.
> >
> > I have it all figured out dufus, only you don't like the fact
that I am right one more time.

Ahumma ahumma ahumma...... You are a real gas when you stumble thru
your own self-built maze of lies and make believe. While you were out
gambling and eating to fill that big gut, I was with all of my family
celebrating my wife's birthday, swimming, and doing all the things
you aren't interested in any longer now that you got harpooned by the
machines in Las Vegas. We had so much fun with our granddaughter we
all laughed so lously. But I think I just broke that decible record
reading youre baloney!!

>
> > > I suspect if a vote were
> > > > taken today that GWB would be found guilty in the majority

of

> > > > countries in the world.
> > >
> > > Gets your facts straight, bozo. What's up here----voting or
> > > hearings?? You'd suspect just about anything with an approach
> like
> > > that.
> >
> > The facts are simple. The vast majority of people in the WORLD
> > believe GWB is a criminal and would find him guilty. Now, put
down
> > that drink, give your 8x10 glossy of GWB a big hug and go to

bed.

>
> More quoting from that 'fact sheet'? Oh please stop it now---I
can't
> stop buckling over in giggles!!

I believe the "buckling over".

Then you understand why..... Is it gas or is it little dicky the
resident gambling addict?

> > > I know, you'd just nuke-em if they disagree
> > > > with you and your fantasy boy. How's your tongue? Has it
> > recovered
> > > > from the SOTU?
> > >
> > > I love it when you show your frustration with a president

that

> > stuffs
> > > it back into the faces of the liberals every time they try to
one-
> > up
> > > him. He makes them...and therefore you...look sooo bad it's
> almost
> > > embarrassing for me to have to sit thru it all.
> >
> > LMAO. The tougue must still be a little sore.

I see you mised one. Can't see very well when your so drunk?

what I do see is never-ending irritation by you over the majority
who's running this country and you can't do a thing about it other
than gripe and cry. That's why I love it when you fools speak up. The
Dumb and the Helpless.

> > > > > > > Typical twisted and cowardly logic. If we don't

create

> > > millions of collateral victims while blasting the terrorist

leaders into

> > > > > Allah-land over there, you and I will become THEIR
collateral damage over here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Another completely illogical statement. You do this so
> often and don't even realize it. I guess that what happens when

you have

> > > NO
> > > > > > facts to back up your childish assertions.
> > > > >
> > > > > I noticed you stopped cold when it was time to explain

your

> > > > nonsense.
> > > >
> > > > Everyone can plainly see your ridiculous ideas are childish
and
> > > > irrational. Nothing else needs to be explained.
> > >
> > > Translation: you agree with me but don't want to say it here.
> >
> > No, that must be the liquor fogging your already diminished
> thinking.

And another one.

> >
> > > > > I won't push and make you sweat for now. But here's

another

> > piece
> > > > of
> > > > > reality for you to stew over. Actially, two.
> > > > > 1) Today God blessed the world by sinking a shithole

ferry

> > > between
> > > > > Egypt & Saudi Arabia. 1000 possible Islamist extremists
> > > eliminated.
> > > > > 2) Denmark publishes a picture of the Maniacal Muslim
Prophet
> > > with
> > > > a
> > > > > bomb as a turbin, causing world-wide Muslim protests,
> violence,
> > > and
> > > > > crazed reactions. Just like with you, the truth sets them
> off.
> > If
> > > > the
> > > > > LIVING Pope was drawn with his dick in his hand, do you
think
> > HIS
> > > > > followers would react in such moronic proportions?

There's

a
> > good
> > > > > reason for you to wake up and realize that the only good
> Muslim
> > > is
> > > > a
> > > > > dead Muslim. You can't just sit back and negotiate with
such
> > > > animals, you can't expect to wage wars with every country

in

> > which
> > > they hide, and you can't worry about killing ten thousand of
them
> > > just to get one or two fanatical leaders. They represent such

a

> > poor,
> > > > downtrodden slice of society that they have nothing to lose
by
> > > rebelling after a leader is destroyed.
> > > >
> > > > Have another drink. It helps portray the real Rob Singer,

an

> > > abusive and moronic individual.
> > >
> > > Tell me I didn't expect that from one who hasn't a grasp on

the

> > world
> > > situation..... You make me look better every passing moment,
and
> I
> > > don't even NEED your support!
> >
> > No, you need professional help. Please, tell us again how a
massive
> > nuclear war will solve all the problems of the world.
>
> Oops--you need more help. MASSIVE nuclear war? With whom?

Your scenario, dufus. Your brain appears to have quit functioning
altogether.

You can read? USA = nukes. Muslim extremists and collateral damage =
dead meat. A nuclear war is one in which the other side FIRES a few
dumbo!

> > > kill? No remaining Al-Q will mess with our country again.

They

> only
> > > > > understand and respect
> > > > > > > > > viscious violence, and they use our coddled,
pacifist
> > > ways
> > > > > > > against us while they slowly peel away. One BIG

message

> > would
> > > > > eliminate the threat forever.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Are you really this naive? It would NOT remove the
> > threat.
> > > > > > Instead,
> > > > > > > > it would multiply the threat 100 times over. You
really
> > > > should
> > > > > > try
> > > > > > > > using that wasted space above your neck every now

and

> > then.
> > > > > Have
> > > > > > > you ever read a history book in your life?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your position is that of most sissified scardy cats

in

> the
> > > > > country.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No, my position is actually much closer to GWBs'

position

> > then
> > > > your
> > > > > > idiotic "nuke em" plan. So, it appears you think GWB is
> > > a "scardy
> > > > > > cat".
> > > > >
> > > > > Where'd you pull that out of?
> > > >
> > > > So far GWB hasn't nuked anyone.
> > >
> > > Duh! Give me a few days to check that statement out.
> >
> > I'll give you all the time you need. For most people that's

about

a
> > nanosecond, for you it may takes several years.

Poor dufus Robbie can't respond anymore.

> >
> > > >
> > > > > First, you're position is one of
> > > > > cowardice. Does the great GWB sound like a back-off

coward

to
> > > you??
> > > >
> > > > The draft dodger has the gall to call someone else a

coward.

> You
> > > are
> > > > the epitomy of cowardice. You ran when faced with honorably
> > serving
> > > > your country.
> > >
> > > HELLO! I wasn't involved in the hippie draft!
> >
> > Coward.
> >
> > > It was a method of
> > > weeding out the do-nothings and the low lifes anyway. Instead
and
> > > unlike you--who hide in the bowels of corporate America after

a

> > short
> > > stint smoking dope in the military--I served the US Gov't.

for

> TEN
> > > years.
> >
> > Coward.

And from the looks of how you cower in ridicule here, 'd say you
dropped a tab or two of acid along the merry way. Face it. Serving in
the military when you said you did was a farce--ESP. for those who
went to Vietnam to smoke dope and rape children for five dollah.

> >
> > >
> > > You are the putrid smell at the bottem of that bottle
> > > > you are drinking to forget your failures. You can't

eliminate

> the
> > > > stench because YOU are the stench.
> > >
> > > As a matter of fact, I'm on my 2nd Jack Daniels Single Barrel
> right
> > > now!
> >
> > Was there ever a doubt?
> >
> > > Premium pour. No stench.
> >
> > In your hands, plenty of stench.

???

> >
> > > You'd know that if you didn't spend so
> > > much time in those dumps you take your addict wife to. But

who

> > knows.
> > > Maybe that's all she's worth. I mean, pathological gamblers

are

a
> > > dime a dozen in that scumbag town.
> >
> > We're still waiting for that original thought, dufus.

OK, I'll consider that now that I've embarrassed you with facts.

>
> That I can tell. After all, who DOESN'T know about your tasteless
> family.....

Everyone. I don't have any need to discuss them on a forum.

HAHAHA! You've already insulted your hag wife by blaming her for the
family degeneracy. Then you make up a story about the 'family'
visiting you in Dec. Oh what fun this is to see you squirm like the
little geeky weasel that you truly are!

You have

the NEED because you live through them vicariously due to your
failures in life. It's so easy to see right through you.

So goes the transparent tales of an addict family that moved to LV
just to be closer to the gambling machines...... If you only knew how
despicable you are to the rest of us decent folk, you'd get a HUGE
wake-up call.

> > > > > > The other billion Muslims.
> > > > >
> > > > > One billion Muslims against a super-power. You need to
brush
> up
> > > on
> > > > > modern warfare.
> > > >
> > > > You need to read a little history and understand the real
> > > capabilites
> > > > of our armed forces. Do you really think we'd stand up
against
> a
> > > > worldwide force against us? Do you think they'd support us
> after
> > a
> > > > pre-emptive nuclear strike? Robbie, the dufus, shows his
> > > intelligence level once again.
> > >
> > > Tell me, are you afraid of your own shadow too?
> >
> > I served my country while you ran and hid in a sewer of a
country.
> > The stench is still part of you and will always be part of you.

I

> > wonder who everyone believes is afraid of their shadow? Yes,
dufus,
> > it's you.

Yet another one.

> >
> > > And I'm surprised at
> > > how really really stupid you are when it comes to reality. Or
> even
> > > your famous fallback--'theory'--in this case. Think of the
> > countries
> > > where the Muslim scum hang out. How many have nukes, and how
many
> > can
> > > deliver them this far? Then take a guess at how many are
closeby
> an
> > > ocean or large waterway. Then look up how many LA class subs
> we've
> > > got prowling the seas and how many multi-warhead tipped

nuclear

> > > missiles are on them and what kind of destruction they can

dish

> > out.
> > > Then figure out what aircraft carry similar weaponry (I know,
an
> > > unlearned geek like you would have to reference Jane's to get
> > > anything right). And when you're all done getting spoon-fed

the

> > facts
> > > think about which FIRST WORLD countries wouldn't take our

side

> > after
> > > pre-emptive strikes. Talk is one thing (the French & Germans)
but
> > you
> > > think they'll try to attack us after that? See, I TOLD you

you

> > should
> > > have gotten out more when you had the chance.
> >
> > Please, tell us again how a massive nuclear war will solve all
the
> > problems of the world. While your at it, moron, do you really
> believe
> > that Russia and China would standby while we destroy humanity?
>
> Now there's a question....Russia & China. Dilapidated and

outdated

> sub fleets--both of them, and these subs are the ultimate weapon.
All
> of them can easily be taken out by our surface ships let alone
subs.
> Overrated....both of them, by liberals. Worried about by chicken
> littles. Always an excuse---never any facts.

LMAO. You never hesitate to make foolish, drunken claims are simply
not backed up by the facts.

I tried to give you a hint and you, as usual, missed it in its
entirety. Get up to speed with Jane's and see how dumb & naiive you
really are.

> > > > > > We already know you have no conscience.
> > > > >
> > > > > So you agree that's the ONLY way to deal with these
> barbarians.
> > > > Good. You have a conscience, you lose.
> > > >
> > > > Nope. I do know an alcoholic, brain-addled moron could

never

> > > > understand what needs to be done.
> > >
> > > ???
> >
> > Finally, the sum of all your intelligence.
>
> I guess I've used up 100% of my brain!

Do I think the liquor has decimated 100% of your capabilities.
ABSOLUTELY.

>
> > > > > Otherwise you'd have quit
> > > > > > abusing your family long ago. No one is suprised that
you'd
> > > take
> > > > > the
> > > > > > same approach to the rest of the world. Unfortunately,
the
> > > world
> > > > > > would be unliveable after your solution ... or maybe

you

> > think
> > > > > > nuclear winter would be an improvement?
> > > > >
> > > > > In a one-sided event like this, who cares what
happens 'over
> > > > there'?
> > > >
> > > > LMAO. There is no "over there" when it comes to massive
nuclear
> > > > attacks. You are beyond help.
> > >
> > > You are sooo naiive. Just like the nerds from years ago. An

old

> man
> > > still stuck in the past.
> >
> > Please, tell us again how a massive nuclear war will solve all
the
> > problems of the world. Do the voices tell you this? How long

have

> you
> > been hearing these voices? We already know you haven't had an
> > original though in several decades.

The dufus missed another one.

> >
> > > >
> > > > > Saving this country is the only thing that matters. Maybe
> > you're
> > > OK
> > > > > with losing Cleveland or SF or NYC, as a method of making
> peace
> > > > with
> > > > > these losers. With you in charge that's just what would
> happen--
> > > > > they'd have the time and the resources to go ahead with

it.

> > BOOM!
> > > >
> > > > With your approach we lose them all and the rest of the
> country.
> > > have another drink and try again tomorrow.
> > >
> > > Admit it. All you care about is losing the video poker

machines

> and
> > > nothing else. But then again, you really have nothing else to
> live
> > > for.
> >
> > Here's the drunken draft dodger looking in the mirror again.

You

> > don't even have the balls to respond on this forum without a
couple
> > of drinks so I know you'll never face me on the tennis court.
>
> OOPS! Another blooper by the dicker! I KNOW you're not gonna get
any
> sleep tonight!!

I slept great knowing you'd continue to slobber and make fool of

your

self. How's the headache?

Better rest up and have that CASH on the courts! I'm expecting to
read the WHEN & WHERE in one of your next hurried messages!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

> The jury decides whether a person either did it or they didn't.

Not

> guilty = innocent of all charges. OJ's jury said the evidence
presented
> told them HE DID NOT KILL THEM. They weren't asked to play with
words.
> Nothing can ever be "proven" unless there's unaltered video tape
and a
> confession. My question remains to people who go on saying he's

not

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vp_mavin" <vp_mavin@...> wrote:

> innocent: Are you more in tune with 100% of the facts presented
before
> the court than the jury is? What's the reasonable answer here? Of
> course. The jury knows more about the case than you.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------

-

The stunned look on Barry Sheck's face when the not proven verdict
was read was priceless, even OJ's attorneys knew the evidence

against him went far beyond a reasonable doubt.

I did see that too, but that has no bearing on the 12 people in the
jury's knowledge of what happened.

"Are you more in tune with 100% of the facts presented before
the court than the jury is? The jury knows more about the case

than you."

The pertinent facts were amply covered in the media, international
coverage, where were you when the trial was going on?

That's an out for whomever wants to have it their way. You act like
it's Burger King when things just don't go your way. The SENSATIONAL
facts were in the media. Not ALL the facts were reported obviously,
and no one on the outside saw facial expressions at crucial times nor
did they listen to or hear every side of every argument. I believed
he killed them at the start of the trial, and until he put that too-
small glove on I still did. It was then I started to wonder. Are you
saying the jury was fixed, they were paid off, or they didn't listen
properly? I accepted the verdict as honest truth and reality because
people with a more intensive view of the facts made the unanimous
decision. That's simple common sense.

A somewhat naive post. You can only understand the OJ
criminal verdict by knowing the social history of
South Central Los Angeles, especially the culture that
has grown up around the jury verdict opportunity.

This is not inconsistent with the design of the
criminal justice system. Jury trials were worked into
the Magna Carta in order to free the populace from the
harshness of the King's Justice. Whether or not the
defendant "did it" is often a marginalized issue.

···

--- vp_mavin <vp_mavin@yahoo.com> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111"
<rsinger1111@...>
wrote:
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vp_mavin"
<vp_mavin@> wrote:
> >
> > A jury verdict of not guilty doesn't mean
innocent, it menas not
> proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The European
term of not proven
is
> probably more correct then our term not guilty. I
don't think there
are
> any intelligent people think OJ is innocent of
that brutal double
> homicide.
>
> The jury decides whether a person either did it or
they didn't. Not
> guilty = innocent of all charges. OJ's jury said
the evidence
presented
> told them HE DID NOT KILL THEM. They weren't asked
to play with
words.
> Nothing can ever be "proven" unless there's
unaltered video tape
and a
> confession. My question remains to people who go
on saying he's not
> innocent: Are you more in tune with 100% of the
facts presented
before
> the court than the jury is? What's the reasonable
answer here? Of
> course. The jury knows more about the case than
you.
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------

The stunned look on Barry Sheck's face when the not
proven verdict
was read was priceless, even OJ's attorneys knew the
evidence against
him went far beyond a reasonable doubt.

"Are you more in tune with 100% of the facts
presented before
the court than the jury is? The jury knows more
about the case than
you."

The pertinent facts were amply covered in the media,
international
coverage, where were you when the trial was going
on?

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

That's an out for whomever wants to have it their way. You act like
it's Burger King when things just don't go your way. The

SENSATIONAL

facts were in the media. Not ALL the facts were reported obviously,

Not only were all the facts reported, they were re-reported, digested
re-digested and then reported all over again in excruciating detail.
Do you ever watch television, listen to the radio, or read a
newspaper?

and no one on the outside saw facial expressions at crucial times

nor

did they listen to or hear every side of every argument. I believed
he killed them at the start of the trial, and until he put that too-
small glove on I still did. It was then I started to wonder. Are

you

saying the jury was fixed, they were paid off, or they didn't

listen

properly? I accepted the verdict as honest truth and reality

because

people with a more intensive view of the facts made the unanimous
decision. That's simple common sense.

OJ was wearing a pair of rubber gloves underneath the dried out
bloody gloves he used during the murder...have you ever tried to put
on a pair of tight fitting leather gloves on over another pair of
rubber gloves...probably won't work...have you ever had a pair of wet
leather gloves that were not carefully dried out...they shrink and
get somewhat brittle.

Any opinions on the Blake case?

Not only were all the facts reported, they were re-reported,

digested re-digested and then reported all over again in excruciating
detail. Do you ever watch television, listen to the radio, or read a

newspaper?

All you know is what you read, listened to and mostly, as it now
appears, imagined. You have zero idea whether or not anything that
might have affected YOUR decision was not read or listened to....or
even reported.

> and no one on the outside saw facial expressions at crucial times
nor did they listen to or hear every side of every argument. I

believed he killed them at the start of the trial, and until he put
that too-small glove on I still did. It was then I started to wonder.
Are you saying the jury was fixed, they were paid off, or they didn't

listen properly? I accepted the verdict as honest truth and reality
because people with a more intensive view of the facts made the

unanimous decision. That's simple common sense.

OJ was wearing a pair of rubber gloves underneath the dried out
bloody gloves he used during the murder...have you ever tried to

put on a pair of tight fitting leather gloves on over another pair of

rubber gloves...probably won't work...have you ever had a pair of

wet leather gloves that were not carefully dried out...they shrink
and get somewhat brittle.

And have you ever considered that the jury members doesn't know or at
least weren't told by any of the intellects in the prosecution as
much as you know from your comfortable armchair? It's all blind
criticizm from us out here, which is why the word of the jury is one
that is undeniablely unanimous in every way.

Any opinions on the Blake case?

What, Beretta guilty of murder? Are you kidding? I didn't follow that
one at all, but I know enough to trust the jury. Scott Peterson on
the other hand is someone I'd like to have seen been proven that he
did the crime instead of with all the circumstancial evidence used to
convict him. But I trust that the jury did the right thing there too.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vp_mavin" <vp_mavin@...> wrote: